Ombudsman Of Armenia: Nikol Pashinyan May Be Granted Pardon

OMBUDSMAN OF ARMENIA: NIKOL PASHINYAN MAY BE GRANTED PARDON

ArmInfp
2010-02-19 15:54:00

ArmInfo. Editor-in-Chief of the oppositional Haykakan Zhamanak
(Armenian Time) Daily may be granted pardon, says Armenian Ombudsman
Armen Haroutyunyan’s statement disseminated by the Office of the
Armenian Human Rights Defender on Friday.

According to the statement, pardon may be granted to the persons
sentenced for 5-10-year imprisonment for being privy to the 1-2
March 2008 events under Clause 7 Subclause 2 of the resolution
"On proclamation of amnesty". Taking into account the specified
circumstance, the ombudsman thinks that in case the judgement of
the general jurisdiction court fails to be canceled, amnesty may be
applied with respect to Nikol Pashinyan.

To recall, on 19 January the court of Yerevan communities Center
and Nork-Marash sentenced Nikol Pashinyan, former candidate for MP
to 7-year imprisonment. Pashinyan was accused of applying harmless
violence against the police (Article 316 Part 1 of the Armenian
Criminal Code), and organizing mass disorders on 1-2 March 2008 in
Yerevan (Article 225 Part 1). Pashinyan had been wanted for over a year
and came out of the underground after amnesty had been proclaimed in
summer 2009. The court acquitted Pashinyan under Article 316 but found
him guilty under Article 225. Earlier, on 10 January Pashinyan lost
the parliamentary by-election at the 10th constituency in Yerevan
where he yielded his positions to Ara Simonyan, representative of
the National Unity Party.

UN Report Focuses On Gender-Based Violence

UN REPORT FOCUSES ON GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE

Aysor
Feb 18 2010
Armenia

Today, a report on "Program of Changes in Armenia’s Law in terms of
gender-based violence" was delivered at the UN Office in Armenia. The
program launched in the framework of the UN Population Fund program
"Against Gender Violence in the South Caucasus".

The report was designed by Anna Agababian-led working group, involving
Armenian and foreign experts.

Anna Agababian told journalists that Armenia had joined a range of
international treaties aimed at prevention of the gender violence
and protection of victims.

"Our group’s goal is to identify the gaps in Armenia’s legislation,
and propose a package of legislative reforms," she said.

UN Resident Coordinator, UNDP Resident Representative Dafina Gercheva,
in her turn, said that the international experience shows that it’s
difficult to take any steps against gender violence without the proper
basis of law.

Azerbaijani Government Remained One Of Region’s Worst Jailers Of Jou

AZERBAIJANI GOVERNMENT REMAINED ONE OF REGION’S WORST JAILERS OF JOURNALISTS: CPJ

news.am
Feb 17 2010
Armenia

"Using imprisonment as a crude form of censorship, the authoritarian
government of President Ilham Aliyev remained one of the region’s
worst jailers of journalists," reads "Attacks on the Press 2009:
Azerbaijan" report issued by Committee to Protect Journalists
(CPJ). NEWS.am posts the excerpts.

"Political dissent and independent voices, already in short supply,
came under assault again as Aliyev tightened his grip on the oil-rich
Caspian Sea nation. In March, his government brought before voters
a constitutional amendment to remove presidential term limits,
effectively allowing Aliyev to remain in office for life. The measure,
which passed by a wide margin, was criticized by opposition politicians
and the international community. Aliyev was elected to a second term
in 2008 after electoral laws were changed to restrict participation by
opposition politicians. Aliyev effectively inherited the presidency
from his father, Heydar, himself leader of Azerbaijan for more than
30 years.

In January, the BBC and the U.S. government-funded broadcasters Radio
Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) and Voice of America were forced
to halt FM transmissions in response to a National Television and
Radio Council decision to ban international stations from domestic
frequencies. Radio Azadlyg, the popular Azerbaijani service of
RFE/RL, had become a particularly important alternative news source
for citizens.

The only independent Azerbaijani channel with national reach, ANS,
toned down its criticism of the government since regulators suspended
its license for five months beginning in November 2006.

Low-circulation print media had more editorial freedom, but their
impact on public opinion was small. And with authorities cracking down
on critical journalists–using criminal defamation charges to demand
jail time and high monetary damages–few reporters were willing to
cover sensitive topics, the most dangerous of which was reporting on
Aliyev and his family.

The state’s intolerance of critical voices reached its lowest,
and cruelest, point in August when Novruzali Mamedov, editor of
a now-defunct minority newspaper, died in prison, two years into a
10-year sentence on a trumped-up treason charge. A Penitentiary Service
spokesman said the 68-year-old Mamedov had suffered a stroke–and
the journalist’s lawyer, family, colleagues, and supporters charged
that authorities bore responsibility. Mamedov’s health had severely
deteriorated in the months before his death, they said, and the editor
had repeatedly complained of inadequate medical care.

Defense lawyer Ramiz Mamedov (no relation to the journalist) said
his client had suffered from hypertension, bronchitis, neuritis,
and a prostate tumor, among other ailments.

Authorities refused to release Mamedov on humanitarian grounds or allow
independent medical care. Mamedov’s family filed a lawsuit against
the Azerbaijani Penitentiary Service and officials at Prison No. 15,
where the editor had been held. The case was pending in late year.

Mamedov’s death in state custody threw into sharp relief the plight
of six other members of the news media who were being held in jail
for their work when CPJ conducted its annual worldwide census of
imprisoned journalists on December 1.

Three journalists–Sakit Zakhidov of the pro-opposition daily Azadlyg,
Asif Marzili of the independent weekly Tezadlar, and Ali Hasanov of
the pro-government daily Ideal–were granted early release from prison
in April under a pardon act passed by parliament the month before.

Seeing the amnesty, some analysts expressed hope that the government
might ease its heavy-handed repression of the Azerbaijani press corps.

Those hopes were soon dashed as the government opened its revolving
prison door to four more journalists.

Two were being held on defamation charges, CPJ research showed. In
October, Editor-in-Chief Sardar Alibeili and reporter Faramaz
Novruzoglu of the weekly newspaper Nota were given three-month prison
terms after they said in several articles that a civic group and its
leader were little more than government mouthpieces.

International monitors–including those with the Vienna-based
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe–have frequently
criticized the government for its refusal to decriminalize defamation.

But while defamation has been a favorite tool in silencing the press,
IRFS director Huseynov noted that officials have been inventive in
using laws as far-ranging as treason and hooliganism.

Take the case of two video bloggers–30-year-old Emin Milli and
26-year-old Adnan Hajizade–who were arrested in July after posting a
series of sketches criticizing government policies. A satirical video
the bloggers produced and posted on YouTube in June may have been a
particular trigger for reprisal. The video criticized the country’s
importation of donkeys, supposedly at high prices. The sketch depicted
a fictional press conference at which Hajizade, wearing a donkey suit,
talked to a group of Azerbaijani &’journalists.’

In an Orwellian scenario, Milli and Hajizade were taken into custody
after they went to a police station to report an assault. The pair
had been debating politics with friends at a Baku restaurant when two
unidentified men interrupted the conversation and started a brawl,
local press reports said. By the time the bloggers arrived at the
police station, the two assailants had supposedly filed a complaint
and officers had already decided what to do. Without investigating,
police charged Milli and Hajizade with &’hooliganism’ and &’inflicting
minor bodily harm,’ the Azerbaijani press reported. On November 11, a
Sabail District Court judge pronounced the bloggers guilty, sentencing
Milli to two and a half years in jail and Hajizade to two years.

CPJ decried the case as entrapment and noted that the circumstances
were strikingly similar to the 2007 jailing of Genimet Zakhidov, editor
of Azadlyg. Zakhidov was arrested and sentenced to four years in prison
for &’hooliganism’ and &’inflicting minor bodily harm’ after a pair
of strangers accosted him on a Baku street, then supposedly filed a
police complaint claiming they had been the victims. In September,
a Baku judge denied an appeal for a lighter sentence because Zakhidov
had been reprimanded in prison for not joining a volleyball game,
IRFS reported.

In November, CPJ honored one imprisoned journalist whose case was
emblematic of the government’s efforts to silence its critics. Eynulla
Fatullayev, a recipient of CPJ’s International Press Freedom Award,
was imprisoned in April 2007 on a series of fabricated charges,
including terrorism and defamation. Fatullayev, editor of the
now-closed independent Russian-language weekly Realny Azerbaijan
and the Azeri-language daily Gundalik Azarbaycan, was jailed in
retaliation for his investigation into the 2005 murder of his former
boss and mentor, Elmar Huseynov. Fatullayev had alleged an official
cover-up in the case.

Reporting from or about the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic–a western
exclave that borders Armenia, Iran, and Turkey–remained Azerbaijan’s
most dangerous assignment. Only a handful of reporters worked in
the territory, and they faced intimidation and harassment from local
security agents. In February 2009, Idrak Abbasov, a reporter with the
Baku-based independent newspaper Zerkalo and a researcher with IRFS,
traveled to Nakhchivan to study local press freedom conditions. Agents
with the Nakhchivan Ministry of National Security (MNB) blindfolded
him, took his identity papers, camera, notebook, and cell phone,
and interrogated him for hours about his trip. An unidentified agent
demanded that Abbasov reveal the names of his colleagues in the
region, cursed at him, and accused him of being a spy for Armenia,
the journalist told CPJ after his detention. Before releasing him,
officers deleted images from his camera and ordered him to leave
Nakhchivan immediately.

Abbasov told CPJ that agents had lured him to an MNB station on the
pretext that they would answer questions. He said the mistreatment
left him with stress-induced heart problems that required several
days of hospitalization."

Israel’s New Strategy: "Sabotage" And "Attack" The Global Justice Mo

ISRAEL’S NEW STRATEGY: "SABOTAGE" AND "ATTACK" THE GLOBAL JUSTICE MOVEMENT
Ali Abunimah

The Electronic Intifada
16 February 2010

A Reut Institute presentation calls on Israel to "attack catalysts"
— global peace and justice activists.

An extraordinary series of articles, reports and presentations by
Israel’s influential Reut Institute has identified the global movement
for justice, equality and peace as an "existential threat" to Israel
and called on the Israeli government to direct substantial resources to
"attack" and possibly engage in criminal "sabotage" of this movement
in what Reut believes are its various international "hubs" in London,
Madrid, Toronto, the San Francisco Bay Area and beyond.

The Reut Institute’s analyses hold that Israel’s traditional strategic
doctrine — which views threats to the state’s existence in primarily
military terms, to be met with a military response — is badly out
of date. Rather, what Israel faces today is a combined threat from a
"Resistance Network" and a "Delegitimization Network."

The Resistance Network is comprised of political and armed groups
such as Hamas and Hizballah who "rel[y] on military means to sabotage
every move directed at affecting separation between Israel and the
Palestinians or securing a two-state solution" ("The Delegitimization
Challenge: Creating a Political Firewall, Reut Institute, 14 February
2010).

Furthermore, the "Resistance Network" allegedly aims to cause
Israel’s political "implosion" — a la South Africa, East Germany or
the Soviet Union — rather than bring about military defeat through
direct confrontation on the battlefield.

The "Delegitimization Network" — which Reut Institute president and
former Israeli government advisor Gidi Grinstein provocatively claims
is in an "unholy alliance" with the Resistance Network — is made
up of the broad, decentralized and informal movement of peace and
justice, human rights, and BDS (boycott, divestment and sanctions)
activists all over the world. Its manifestations include protests
against Israeli officials visiting universities, Israeli Apartheid
Week, faith-based and trade union-based activism, and "lawfare"
— the use of universal jurisdiction to bring legal accountability
for alleged Israeli war criminals. The Reut Institute even cited my
speech to the student conference on BDS held at Hampshire College last
November as a guide to how the "delegitimization" strategy supposedly
works ("Eroding Israel’s Legitimacy in the International Arena,"
Reut Institute, 28 January 2010).

The combined "attack" from "resisters" and "delegitimizers," Reut says,
"possesses strategic significance, and may develop into a comprehensive
existential threat within a few years." It further warns that a
"harbinger of such a threat would be the collapse of the two-state
solution as an agreed framework for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict, and the coalescence behind a ‘one-state solution’ as a new
alternative framework."

At a basic level, Reut’s analysis represents an advance over the most
primitive and hitherto dominant layers of Israeli strategic thinking;
it reflects an understanding, as I put it in my speech at Hampshire,
that "Zionism simply cannot bomb, kidnap, assassinate, expel, demolish,
settle and lie its way to legitimacy and acceptance."

But underlying the Reut Institute’s analysis is a complete inability to
disentangle cause and effect. It seems to assume that the dramatic
erosion in Israel’s international standing since its wars on
Lebanon in 2006 and Gaza in 2009 is a result of the prowess of the
"delegitimization network" to which it imputes wholly nefarious,
devious and unwholesome goals — effectively the "destruction of
Israel."

It blames "delegitimizers" and "resisters" for frustrating the
two-state solution but ignores Israel’s relentless and ongoing
settlement-building drive — supported by virtually every state organ
— calculated and intended to make Israeli withdrawal from the West
Bank impossible.

It never considers for a moment that the mounting criticism of Israel’s
actions might be justified, or that the growing ranks of people ready
to commit their time and efforts to opposing Israel’s actions are
motivated by genuine outrage and a desire to see justice, equality and
an end to bloodshed. In other words, Israel is delegitimizing itself.

Reut does not recommend to the Israeli cabinet — which recently
held a special session to hear a presentation of the think tank’s
findings — that Israel should actually change its behavior toward
Palestinians and Lebanese. It misses the point that apartheid South
Africa also once faced a global "delegitimization network" but that
this has now completely disappeared. South Africa, however, still
exists. Once the cause motivating the movement disappeared — the
rank injustice of formal apartheid — people packed up their signs
and their BDS campaigns and went home.

Instead, Reut recommends to the Israeli government an aggressive
and possibly criminal counter-offensive. A powerpoint presentation
Grinstein made to the recent Herzliya Conference on Israeli national
security actually calls on Israel’s "intelligence agencies to focus"
on the named and unnamed "hubs" of the "delegitimization network"
and to engage in "attacking catalysts" of this network. In its "The
Delegitimization Challenge: Creating a Political Firewall" document,
Reut recommends that "Israel should sabotage network catalysts."

The use of the word "sabotage" is particularly striking and should
draw the attention of governments, law enforcement agencies and
university officials concerned about the safety and welfare of
their students and citizens. The only definition of "sabotage"
in United States law deems it to be an act of war on a par with
treason, when carried out against the United States. In addition,
in common usage, the American Heritage Dictionary defines sabotage
as "Treacherous action to defeat or hinder a cause or an endeavor;
deliberate subversion." It is difficult to think of a legitimate use
of this term in a political or advocacy context.

At the very least, Reut seems to be calling for Israel’s spy agencies
to engage in covert activity to interfere with the exercise of legal
free speech, association and advocacy rights in the United States,
Canada and European Union countries, and possibly to cause harm to
individuals and organizations. These warnings of Israel’s possible
intent — especially in light of its long history of criminal activity
on foreign soil — should not be taken lightly.

The Reut Institute, based in Tel Aviv, raises a significant amount
of tax-exempt funds in the United States through a nonprofit arm
called American Friends of the Reut Institute (AFRI). According to
its public filings, AFRI sent almost $2 million to the Reut Institute
in 2006 and 2007.

In addition to a state-sponsored international "sabotage" campaign,
Reut also recommends a "soft" policy. This specifically involves
better hasbara or state propaganda to greenwash Israel as a high-tech
haven for environmental technologies and high culture — what it terms
"Brand Israel."

Other elements include "maintain[ing] thousands of personal
relationships with political, cultural, media and security-related
elites and influentials" around the world, and "harnessing Jewish
and Israeli diaspora communities" even more tightly to its cause. It
even emphasizes that Israel should use "international aid" to boost
its image (its perfunctory foray into earthquake-devastated Haiti
was an example of this tactic).

What ties together all these strategies is that they are aimed at
frustrating, delaying and distracting attention from the fundamental
issue: that Israel — despite its claims to be a liberal and democratic
state — is an ultranationalist ethnocracy that relies on the violent
suppression of the most fundamental rights of millions of Palestinians,
soon to be a demographic majority, to maintain the status quo. There
is no "game changer" in Reut’s new strategy.

Reut is apparently unaware even of the irony of trying to reform
"Brand Israel" as something cuddly, while at the same time publicly
recommending that Israel’s notorious spies "sabotage" peace groups
on foreign soil.

But there are two lessons we must heed: Reut’s analysis vindicates the
effectiveness of the BDS strategy, and as Israeli elites increasingly
fear for the long-term prospects of the Zionist project they are
likely to be more ruthless, unscrupulous and desperate than ever.

Ali Abunimah is co-founder of The Electronic Intifada and author of
One Country: A Bold Proposal to End the Israeli-Palestinian Impasse.

Armenia Participates In 17th International Book Exhibition In Minsk

ARMENIA PARTICIPATES IN 17TH INTERNATIONAL BOOK EXHIBITION IN MINSK

PanARMENIAN.Net
16.02.2010 16:00 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenia participated in 17th international book
exhibition due February 10-14 in Minsk.

Books on Armenia, Artsakh and famous Armenians were featured at the
exhibition, with special emphasis put on demonstration of real facts
on Karabakh conflict, Sumgait tragedy and Khojalu events, Armenian
Foreign Ministry press service reported.

The exhibition hosted 30 participants, including Russia, Ukraine,
Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Tajikistan and France as an honorary guest.

Members of Byelorussian government and leaders of diplomatic missions
accredited to the republic attended the opening ceremony.

Byelorussian Minister of Information, Oleg Proleskovski thanked Armenia
for the forth consecutive year of participation in the exhibition.

Annual Increase Of 7000 Cancer Cases Registered In Armenia, 80-100 C

ANNUAL INCREASE OF 7000 CANCER CASES REGISTERED IN ARMENIA, 80-100 CANCER CARRIERS ARE CHILDREN

PanARMENIAN.Net
15.02.2010 15:42 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Oncological diseases among children in Armenia,
as well as worldwide, are less common than with adults, according to
the head of childhood oncology and chemotherapy department at National
Center of Oncology, professor Grigory Badalyan.

"Annual increase in cancer cases in Armenia comprises 7000; 80-100
cancer carriers are children. Over the last 10 years, cancer incidence
grew by 15% with adults and by 7-8% with children. Still, there’s no
reason to panic, as over 65% of children diagnosed with cancer are
fully recovering after the treatment," prof. Badalyan said at a news
conference, dated to February 15 International Childhood Cancer Day.

"Still, childhood cancer is in many respects different from adult
disease: latent period lasts several months, with treatment results
revealing themselves soon. Childhood cancer risk period lasts 2
years: the child is considered recovered in case no recurrences were
registered at the expiration of the period," he explained.

According to him, malignant tumors can develop in children of any age,
yet, children aged 2-4 and 10-12 are at highest risk.

In conclusion, the professor advised special care for pregnant women
by avoiding stress, smoking and use of carcinogens to prevent possible
occurrence of cancer in unborn children.

Ankara Has Much To Gain From Not Linking Karabakh Conflict To Rappro

ANKARA HAS MUCH TO GAIN FROM NOT LINKING KARABAKH CONFLICT TO RAPPROCHEMENT WITH ARMENIA

PanARMENIAN.Net
15.02.2010 15:53 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The recent presidential speech in Chatham House
contained new ideas, according to Alexander Manasyan, Yerevan State
University professor.

"It’s notable that President Sargsyan touched upon Nakhijevan in his
address," prof. Manasyan told reporters on Monday.

As to normalization of relations between Armenia and Turkey, he said
that Ankara has much to gain from not linking Karabakh conflict
settlement to rapprochement with Armenia, since otherwise Yerevan
can raise the Nakhijevan issue.

Prof. Manasyan also added that protracting the process of ratification
of the Armenian-Turkish protocols, Ankara will give cause to US
President Obama to avoid using the term genocide in his April 24
address.

Armenian Traditional Parties Prepare For 95th Anniversary Of Armenia

ARMENIAN TRADITIONAL PARTIES PREPARE FOR 95TH ANNIVERSARY OF ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

PanARMENIAN.Net
15.02.2010 21:31 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ On February 14, at the Stepan Gulian office of Social
Democratic Hnchak Party Central Board representative of ARFD Bureau
Hrant Markarian and Social Democratic Hnchak Party Central Board
Sedrak Achemyan met. The chairman of the Central Board of Ramkavar
Liberal-Democratic Party Mike Harapyan joined the meeting by telephone.

During the meeting the representatives of Armenian traditional parties
discussed joint projects dedicated to the 95th anniversary of the
Armenian Genocide, press office of the Social Democratic Hnchak
Party reported.

The Armenian Genocide (1915-23) was the deliberate and systematic
destruction of the Armenian population of the Ottoman Empire during
and just after World War I. It was characterized by massacres, and
deportations involving forced marches under conditions designed to
lead to the death of the deportees, with the total number of deaths
reaching 1.5 million.

The date of the onset of the genocide is conventionally held to be
April 24, 1915, the day that Ottoman authorities arrested some 250
Armenian intellectuals and community leaders in Constantinople.

Thereafter, the Ottoman military uprooted Armenians from their homes
and forced them to march for hundreds of miles, depriving them of
food and water, to the desert of what is now Syria.

To date, twenty countries and 44 U.S. states have officially recognized
the events of the period as genocide, and most genocide scholars
and historians accept this view. The Armenian Genocide has been also
recognized by influential media including The New York Times, BBC,
The Washington Post and The Associated Press.

The majority of Armenian Diaspora communities were formed by the
Genocide survivors.

Provision of loans under state program on housing for young families

Provision of loans under state program on housing for young families
to start in March

13.02.2010

ArmInfo.The first loans under the state program on housing for young
families will be provided in Armenia in March 2010, Vardan Aramyan,
Deputy Finance Minister of Armenia, told ArmInfo correspondent.

According to him, the newest universal mortgage credit company to
implement the given state program will be registered by the Central
Bank of Armenia (CBA) in the near future. "At the moment we are
working with the CBA at signing of an agreement, in particularly, it
is envisaged to sign an agent agreement in the person of the finance
ministry and the created credit company, and on the basis of this
agreement the government will allocate 60 mln AMD as subsidy. When the
company receives credit applications, we will pass provide the
subsidies to the beneficiaries",- said the deputy minister and added
that name of the company will be associated with the name of the state
program itself.

To note, since 2009 the National Mortgage Company has been operating
in Armenia to implement social programs on provision of housing. As
regards the necessity of creation of the new credit company, Aramyan
said that the goal of the National Mortgage Company that works
according to market conditions is to carry out refinancing, moreover,
the national Mortgage Company is expected to issue securities in the
future. "In order not to introduce distortions in the market, a
decision has been taken to set up a certain company, which will
provide resources at lower rates than the market ones, this is its
social component",- he said.

To recall, the new mortgage company will be opened with an authorized
capital of 3 bln AMD. Under the state mortgage program, loans for
acquisition of housing will be provide all over Armenia. The value of
the property is not to exceed 16 mln AMD, and the requested prepayment
will range from 30% to 35% of the housing value. The loans will be
provided for up to 10 years at a subsidized interest rate of 8-10%
p.a. Contenders for loans under the given state program are the family
couples, whose summary age does not exceed 60 years. At the same time,
either of the persons is not to be older than 35. In addition, a
single parent under 30 may also make use of the program.

Deputy Chairman of CBA Vache Gabrielyan said earlier that to receive a
loan, the average monthly budget of young families should be 300-380
thsd AMD, of them 35% (130-160 thsd AMD at the mean) are to be monthly
spent on redemption of the mortgage.

Ricky Martin:’Good Luck At Eurovision!’

RICKY MARTIN:’GOOD LUCK AT EUROVISION!’
Jarmo Siim

Eurovision.tv
Feb 12 2010

Yerevan, Armenia – The Latino star, Ricky Martin, has got himself a bit
involved with Europe’s favourite TV-show this year. Guess in what way!

A couple of days ago, there was a video posted on YouTube, where
the Latino megastar gives a statement, concerning Europe’s favourite
TV-show. Sadly, it’s not his announcement about participating.

However, he does give out his support to one of the ten finalists
for the upcoming Armenian national final.

See for yourself, who is he supporting in the video below.

&_t=Ricky+Martin%3A’Good+luck+at+Eurovision!’

Another well-known name in showbusiness and the world of the Eurovision
Song Contest, the first ever winner of the contest, Lys Assia, is
in Armenia to support another finalist. She was there when Eva Rivas
introduced her song to the public.

Looks like it’s going to be an interesting national final on Sunday,
in Armenia. Stay tuned for more news!

Who do you think will win in Armenia this Sunday? Let us know your
favourites below!

http://www.eurovision.tv/page/news?id=9003