Armenian PM visited expo-2005

Pan Armenian News

ARMENIAN PM VISITED EXPO-2005

07.06.2005 04:42

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian Prime Minister Andranik Margaryan visited
EXPO-2005 in Aichi State, Japan, where he participated in the opening of the
Armenian stand dedicated to the National Day of Armenia, reported the Press
Service of the Armenian Government. He addressed the guests and participants
of the exhibition, specifically noting that similar events, in which over
200 countries and international organizations participate, are in line with
the integration processes in the world and allow establishing not only
economic and commercial relations between peoples and states, but also
promote cultural and humanitarian ties. In his words, EXPO-2005 will promote
multilateral cooperation. Thereupon he encouraged unification of
representatives of the three South Caucasian countries in Caucasus joint
pavilion. «In the age of scientific and technical progress, development of
economy it is necessary to use all opportunities to make peoples and states
closer, to know more about each other and to specify cooperation
opportunities,» Andranik Margaryan stated. Thereupon, in his words,
recognizing the truth that international integration and unification is
possible only via development of each sovereign state, history of each
people, maintaining cultural identity. «I assure that from sunny Armenia we
brought the best from the heart and the soul and it has been peculiar to the
Armenian people during the ages of its history, today and in the future,»
the PM said. After the opening of the Armenian stand Mr. Margaryan visited
other pavilions of the EXPO. It should be noted that in Nagoya city a
reception was organized for the Armenian delegation, which will today head
for Tokyo, where bilateral meetings with Japanese supreme officials will be
held.

Foreign Investments In Armenia Make 60 Mln 191.3 Thousand USD In Fir

FOREIGN INVESTMENTS IN ARMENIA MAKE 60 MLN 191.3 THOUSAND USD IN FIRST QUARTER

YEREVAN, JUNE 3, NOYAN TAPAN. In January-March of 2005, foreign
investments of a total of 60 mln 191.3 thousans USD were made in
Armenia, which exceeded by 44% the index of the same period of last
year. In the indicated period, direct foreign investments made 35
mln 657.6 thousand USD, exceeding by 27.5% the respective index of
2004. According to the RA National Statistical Service, 63.4% of
the overall foreign investments and 47,4% of the direct investments
was allocated to the sphere of communication. 17.3% of the direct
investments was made in the production of foodstuffs and drinks,
while 11.5% – in the air transport sector.

Law “On Conducting Meetings, Rallies, Processions And Demonstrations

LAW “ON CONDUCTING MEETINGS, RALLIES, PROCESSIONS AND DEMONSTRATIONS”
DISCUSSED WITH PARTICIPATION OF REPRESENTATIVES OF ARMENIA, OSCE
AND PACE

YEREVAN, JUNE 3, NOYAN TAPAN. On the initiative of the CE Venice
Commission and OSCE Yerevan Office a roundtable on the subject “Freedom
of Holding Meetings: Legislation and Application” was organized
on June 3 at Yerevan “Congress” hotel. The goal of the event was
to discuss RA law “On Conducting Meetings, Rallies, Processions and
Demonstrations,” its application, as well as to discuss it from point
of view of correspondence of the draft of law’s amendments approved
recently in the first reading at NA to European standards. The event’s
organizers tried to combine those bearing the law’s influence and
those responsible for law’s execution at the discussion. Experts of
CE Venice Commission and OSCE Democratic Institutions and Human Rights
Office (DIHRO) who are in Yerevan on a working visit also participated
in the discussion. Ambassador Christian Shtrohal, Director of OSCE
Democratic Institutions and Human Rights Office, mentioned in his
greeting speech that the holding of the event with joint participation
of Armenia’s, OSCE’s and CE’s representatives is the evidence of
a long-lasting cooperation aimed at contributing to reformation of
democratic processes in Armenia. According to him, the above-mentioned
law adopted a year ago by the NA was sent for an expertise on the
NA’s initiative, which is the evidence of parliament’s devotion to
pursuing of fulfilment of obligations assumed towards the CE and
correspondence to European standards. The experts had revealed that a
number of provisions of the current law don’t correspond to European
standards and the parliament initiated realization of amendments. The
ambassador expressed a hope that finally the law will correspond to
the principles adopted by Europe. From point of view of provision
of pluralism the main right to express opinions is closely connected
with the rights to conduct rallies, processions. Mass events should be
peaceful, disciplined, without violence, appeals sowing religious and
racial discrimination, but the primary is freedom and the limitations
should be exceptions aimed at provision of observance of the law. The
above-mentioned principle was dominating in all speeches of European
experts. Gianni Buquicchio, Secretary of CE Venice Commission, also
mentioned that the CE attaches great importance to having a good law
on conducting meetings in Armenia. According to him, proceeding from
this PACE precisely suggested Armenia amending the current law. The
possibility to completely enjoy fundamental human rights and freedoms
is the evidence of the extent of country’s democratization. There can
be limitations only in cases fixed by the law but the latters should
be harmonious with the needs of the democratic society. The right
application of the law and exclusion of self-willed limitations by the
respective power links is too important from point of view of complete
recognition of the right to conduct meetings in Armenia. Therefore,
the Venice Commission attaches great importance to the courses to be
organized by the CE for Armenian police in some weeks. The courses
will be followed by other events.

Press Release – Smyrna 1922

The Armenian Writers’ Union
Head: Levon Ananyan
Address: 3 Barekamutyan
375019 Yerevan, Republic of Armenia
Phone: (374 1) 561 831

and

The Armenian Genocide Institute-Museum
Director: Dr. Lavrenti Barseghyan
Address: Tsitsernakaberd
375028 Yerevan, Republic of Armenia
Phone: (374 1) 390 981; (374 1) 391 041; (374 1) 391 412
URL:

PRESS RELEASE

SMYRNA 1922: Dr. Hatcherian’s journal in three languages

On April 27, 2005, the Armenian Writers’ Union in conjunction with the
Genocide Institute-Museum launched three editions of Dora Sakayan’s
book based on Dr. G. Hatcherian’s journal, “My Smyrna Ordeal in the
year 1922.” The event was part of the many initiatives to commemorate
the 90th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide in the Armenian capital
of Yerevan.

Dr. Garabed Hatcherian’s journal is an eyewitness account of the
1922 Smyrna catastrophe, when the ancient city was destroyed by
a spectacular fire and the entire Armenian and Greek populations
were either massacred or forced to flee. The sequence of events
that led to this disaster stems from the defeat of Turkey by the
Allies in WW1, the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, the rise of the
Kemalists and the postwar peace settlements. Dr. Hatcherian’s journal
covers the period between August 28, 1922 and April 7, 1923, with a
special focus on the two infernal weeks of September 9 through 25,
when the family of eight miraculously escaped the catastrophe. Ten
other members of the extended family, including the mothers of the
Hatcherian couple, along with their brothers and their families,
stayed behind and were all massacred. The journal chronicles on a
day-by-day basis the most significant events in and around Smyrna,
as well as the suffering of the Christian civilian population —
Armenians and Greeks alike — who in those horrific days became the
target of Mustafa Kemal’s nationalists.

Dora Sakayan is Dr. Hatcherian’s granddaughter. She first learned
about the existence of Dr. Hatcherian’s manuscript (completed and
signed on June 1, 1923 in Salonica) in 1992. It had been kept in the
Argentinean branch of the family for almost seventy years. She read
the West Armenian manuscript in 1993 and undertook immediately to
publish it (Montreal: Arod Books, 1995 and 1997). She subsequently
published her English translation (Montreal: Arod Books, 1997) and
later became the general editor of a multilingual series (French, in
Paris: L’Harmattan, 2000), (Spanish, in Montreal: Arod Books, 2001),
(Greek, in Montreal: Arod Books, 2001).

The three new editions are in East Armenian, Russian and —
Turkish. The first two were published just a few days prior to
their launching by the Armenian Genocide Institute-Museum in Yerevan
under the title “Smyrna 1922: The Journal of the Armenian Physician
Hatcherian.” The Turkish edition appeared in March 2005 in Turkey
and was published by the BELGE Publishing House in Istanbul. It
is entitled: Bir Ermeni Doktorun Yasadiklari. Garabet Haceryan’in
Ízmir Guncesi (An Armenian Physician’s Ordeal. Garabet Hatcherian’s
Diary). To date, eight editions of Dr. Hatcherian’s journal have been
prepared and published by Dora Sakayan. She has recently completed
the German translation, which will be published in Germany.

The hall of the Armenian Writers’ Union was filled to capacity with
writers, foreign guests, faculty members, publishing executives and
journalists as well as many of Sakayan’s friends. Writer Levon Ananyan,
head of the Armenian Writers’ Union, delivered the opening speech.
He welcomed the publication of Dr. Hatcherian’s journal in three new
versions, Turkish, East Armenian, and Russian, just in time for the
genocide commemoration, and thanked the courageous publisher Ragip
Zarakolu for the Turkish edition. Mr. Ananian emphasized the crucial
importance of Dr. Hatcherian’s eyewitness account by saying: “It
demonstrates to the world that despite the outcry of the international
community following the Armenian genocide of 1915, the Turks proceeded
to commit yet another genocide seven years later, this time against the
entire Christian population of Smyrna, both the Armenians and Greeks.”
Referring to recent developments in the Armenian-Turkish relations, and
particularly to the Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan’s letter addressed
to the Armenian President Robert Kocharian, Ananyan stated: “They are
proposing to set a group of specialists that would investigate the
archives in Armenia, Turkey and other countries to establish whether
a genocide took place. A document like Dr. Hatcherian’s journal that
enlists the reader into a day-by-day trip through history makes such
undertakings redundant. These are merely efforts of the Turkish
authorities to avoid recognizing the Armenian genocide and evade
responsibility. Let us pay tribute to survivors like Dr. Hatcherian
who left behind their testimonies, a source of incontestable facts,
a weapon to fight those who deny the Armenian genocide.” Mr. Ananyan
also acknowledged the artistic merit of Dr. Hatcherian’s writing by
saying: “Some sections of the diary read as a work of art.”

Ananyan thanked Dr. Tessa Hofmann, the prominent German historian and
academic, expert on the Armenian genocide, a Human Rights activist,
and a friend of the Armenian people, for providing an extensive preface
that elucidates the historical background of the Smyrna catastrophe
and the context in which it developed. He then praised Dora Sakayan
for “having erected a monument to her grandfather’s memory by making
his journal accessible to the world community and thereby an integral
part of survival literature.” He also credited her for a book that
is not only a tribute of love from a granddaughter to her kin but
also a definite contribution to the history of the Armenian genocide.”

Ananyan thanked also the director of the Genocide Institute-Museum, Dr.
Lavrenti Barseghyan, for publishing the East Armenian and the Russian
editions of the journal in such a short time, praising him notably
for the publication of a host of survivor testimonials over the last
few years. Regretting, however, that this storehouse of solid proof
has hardly broken out from the Armenian community, he said, “It is
imperative that this great fund of information be translated into
other languages and made available to the international community.”

Ananyan then asked radio journalist and writer Larissa Gevorkyan to be
the moderator and preside over the panel of speakers. The panelists
were: Dr. Tessa Hofmann, Institute for East European Studies, Free
University Berlin Academician Simeon Kerkyasharyan, Professor of
History, Yerevan State University (YSU) Margo Ghukassyan, writer and
journalist Dr. Khoren Balian, Professor of Medieval Musicology and
vocalist (YSU) Dr. Artem Harutiunyan, Professor of Western Literature
and poet (YSU) Dr. Lussineh Sahakyan, Professor of Turkish Studies
(YSU) Dr. Verzhineh Svazlian, philologist, senior researcher,
Genocide Institute-Museum, Yerevan Dr. Dora Sakayan, Professor of
German Studies, McGill University, Montreal, Canada (p/r) Called upon
to introduce her guest, Larissa Gevorkyan cited Dora Sakayan’s being
up until recently Professor of German Studies at McGill University in
Montreal, Canada, but she also proudly recalled that before migrating
to the New World in 1975 Dora Sakayan had been at the Yerevan State
University — professor starting in 1957 and chair of the Department
of Foreign languages from 1966 on. Gevorkyan then added: “Dora Sakayan
has authored a great number of scholarly books in applied linguistics
and Armenology. However, she confessed to me that nothing has given
her as much satisfaction as working on her grandfather’s journal,
translating it into various languages and editing it.” Gevorkyan also
noted that in order to facilitate the fast production of the series,
she founded her own publishing company, Arod Books, in Montreal, where
so far five of the Smyrna editions have appeared. In closing, Larissa
Gevorkian expressed the wish to see one day Dr. Hatcherian’s gripping
account become the scenario of a film that would draw the world’s
attention on the Smyrna catastrophe, an aftershock of the genocide
that in a matter of seven years ethnically cleansed Asia Minor from
its entire Armenian population, killing thereby 1.5 million innocent
men, women and children.

Larissa Gevorkyan then introduced and gave the floor to Dr. Tessa
Hofmann, who said how happy she was to have prefaced these new editions
and how much she enjoyed presenting them to the press with Dora. “Dr.
Hatcherian’s journal,” she added, “is an extremely important eyewitness
report, un document humain, as the French call it, a human testimony
about the final phase in a decade of genocides. We are talking about
the transition period of the Ottoman Empire becoming the Republic of
Turkey, a transition from a multi-ethnic and multi-religious state
to a monolithic national state. We are talking about five million
Christians, Greeks, Armenians and Assyrians, who vanished through
genocide, expulsion, and assimilation. The final stage of this crime
was the burning of Smyrna.” Dr. Hofmann then went on to describe the
infernal situation, when Smyrna, the once gem city of the Aegean,
went up in flames, and its citizens were burned alive or massacred
by the thousands, and when the 23 international warships anchored
in the harbor did nothing to rescue the endless line of refugees —
Armenian and Greek Christians who were caught, in Dr. Hatcherian’s
words, ‘between fire, sword and water.’ Dr. Hofmann stated that
“the Smyrna catastrophe proves the continuity between the crimes
committed by the Ittihadists and the Kemalists, since the crime
in Smyrna was perpetrated by the Turkish nationalist regime that
followed.” She also stated that, based on the UN definition of
genocide, the Smyrna massacres constitute a genocide, and that in
1998 the Greek Parliament passed a resolution declaring the 14th
of September a day of commemoration of the Asia Minor Genocide. In
the last few years, several governors of American states have named
certain days of September remembrance days of the Smyrna and Asia
Minor Genocides. Dr. Hofmann concluded, saying how grateful she is
to Dora for introducing her to this important document and for asking
her to write a preface.

Academician Kerkyasharyan began his speech by saying: “I have
read the West Armenian original version, and I have read it in one
breath. This is a startling book, a book that forces the reader to
face his humanity, for Dr. Hatcherian’s idealism, his dedication
to his fellow human beings is simply remarkable. While other Smyrna
doctors escaped Smyrna’s disaster by leaving at the first signs of
the imminent danger, Dr. Hatcherian decided to stay. We see him
ready to render medical service, performing operations and assisting
in childbirth. After moving his children and his wife to a sheltered
residence along the seashore, we see him with a fez on his head, and
his military medals pinned on his breast, returning over and over again
to the Armenian and Greek quarters, eager to be with the thousands
of miserable people huddling wherever they could find refuge. After
finally escaping annihilation, we see him, this time in Salonica,
helping the refugees from the Armenian General Benevolent Union’s
medical headquarters. With humanists like Hatcherian, even genocides
prove powerless.” He then added: “I highly appreciate Dora Sakayan’s
thorough scholarly work, supplying Dr. Hatcherian’s journal with 65
well-founded historical annotations and a bibliography that makes the
book a precious instrument in the hands of anybody who seeks truth and
justice.” Kerkyasharyan also stressed the great importance he attaches
to the forthcoming German edition in view of the responsibilities that
Turkey’s WWI ally bears for its collusion, as well as the prospect
of the recognition of the Armenian genocide by the German Parliament.

The next speaker was the writer and journalist Margo Ghukassyan. “I
was in Smyrna in 1980,” she said, ” and I was fascinated by the
city’s natural beauty. Two years ago, I had read the original of Dr.
Hatcherian’s journal in West Armenian, and instantly drew parallels
between the beautiful scenery I had once seen and the dreadful events
at the Smyrna harbor described in the journal 83 years ago. As a writer
myself, I was most impressed by Dr. Hatcherian’s powerful expression
and elegant style. Without exaggerating, instead rather downplaying his
painful experience, he captivates the reader, drawing him in and making
him a participant of the events. Recently, I read the book again,
and although I knew the outcome, I was as anxious as the first time I
read the book to see his salvation from the horrible military barracks
and his safe return to his family. With this journal, Dr. Hatcherian
definitely establishes himself as a writer in his own right.”

Mrs. Ghukassian was followed by Khoren Balian, who first spoke
about Dora Sakayan’s overall achievements as a scholar. He then
added: “It is a catastrophe, when Armenian intellectuals leave
their homeland for good. But Dora Sakayan is a happy exception, a
blessing in disguise. She left Armenia 30 years ago, taking Armenia
with herself, and walking with Armenia around the world, introducing
Armenia to many. She also kept coming back to her homeland to renew
her experiences and replenish herself, while contributing to Armenian
linguistics with a great number of books and articles. She pioneered
Armenology at Montreal’s renowned McGill University and throughout
Canada. Even though she was a professor in the German Department,
she organized Armenological conferences, founded Armenian courses,
and wrote Armenological monographs and textbooks. Lately, she has been
arriving here every year with a new monograph, or a new conference,
or both, presenting them as a gift to Armenia. She is now with us with
three more editions of Dr. Hatcherian’s journal: an East Armenian one,
that will make it accessible to a broad readership in Armenia and
Artsakh, a Russian one for the thousands of readers in the former
Soviet republics, and most importantly, a Turkish edition for the
open-minded Turks who want to discover the truth about the events that
took place in their country between 1915 and 1922. This is a unique
book in the body of survivors’ literature.” Khoren Balian concluded his
impassioned speech, saying: “This book is a true fossil and a precious
relic of the genocide, a thorn in the flesh of the Turks who do not
have the courage to come to terms with their own history.” Since in
the Armenian tradition the launching of a book is done with a song,
Khoren Balian went on to perform “Karahissar,” an Armenian folksong
lamenting over the death of a hero who resisted the deportation from
Shabin Karahissar.

“There are at times documentary narratives that surpass or at least
match the artistic quality of literary works.” That was the opening
statement of Artem Harutiunyan, the next speaker, who went on to
praise Dr. Hatcherian’s literary talents. “In the very first entry of
his journal, the author enlists the reader’s interest and triggers
his fascination by starting his narrative with the presentation of
his peaceful and happy family life, his success story as a medical
doctor and his future plans for himself and his loved ones. Alas,
sudden dramatic and earth-shaking events drastically destroy the
doctor’s life. The reader follows his story with bated breath. Each
page of this journal is important because it reflects deep personal
feelings, an analytic mind, and a compassionate soul. Compared to
the original West Armenian edition, published in 1995, the present
East Armenian version (2005) has become a much more substantial
publication. Dora Sakayan has done an excellent job in gradually
adding new components: an introduction, numerous notes, an epilogue,
a chapter describing the reception of the journal, etc. And now we
see Dr. Hofmann’s most valuable contribution, her preface translated
into Armenian by Dora Sakayan. In its present shape, this book reaches
the reader as an integral unit on the Armenian genocide which is a
valuable documentary, literary, and historical work all in one.”

As an expert in Turkish language, Lusineh Sahakyan concentrated on
the Turkish version of the book. She highly praised the publisher,
Ragib Zarakolu for courageously accepting to publish such a book
in Turkey, and also the translator, Atilla Tuygan, for the fitting
quality of his work. “I made some random comparisons,” said Sahakyan,
“to ascertain the accuracy of the Turkish translation, and I was
pleasantly surprised to see that Tuygan not only had provided the
original Armenian text with an excellent rendition, but also expanded
the conclusion of Sakayan’s introduction, adding a few more rhetorical
questions and rendering her text more convincing and compelling
to the Turkish reader.” Sahakyan then proceeded to translate into
Armenian those additional sentences in the Turkish text and added:
“It is known that for many decades Turkish authorities have withheld
information on the Armenian genocide from the general public, from
history books and from school curricula. No wonder Turkish people are
misinformed about the destiny of the Armenian population under Ottoman
rule and in Smyrna, and defend the official denialist views of the
Modern Turkish government. For any uninformed Turkish citizen, this
book is a genuine source of knowledge about the Armenian genocide.”

Verzhineh Svazlian, a leading collector of eyewitness accounts of
the 1915-1923 Armenian genocide for fifty years, congratulated Dora
Sakayan for having presented her grandfather’s book to the world
in several languages. She added: “Books on the Armenian genocide
have been written in many genres. However, until recently the voice
of survivors was seldom heard. Dr. Hatcherian’s journal provides
precious insight into the Smyrna disaster from the unique perspective
of a survivor. But most importantly, it carries both a historical
and a documentary significance because the author puts down his
bitter experience himself and immediately, recording day-by-day,
hour-by-hour what he sees and feels during this atrocious ordeal. In
my view,” Dr. Svazlian said, “the 20-page description of his five
days in prison is a significant contribution to the annals of history.”

In closing the literary event, Dora Sakayan thanked Dr. L. Barseghyan
for publishing the East Armenian and the Russian editions and
L. Ananyan for organizing the event. She then said: “Today I rejoice,
because I repatriated my grandfather. It is as if I brought his ashes
to Armenia. He is now with his people, in his homeland, where he will
take on a new life, a spiritual one. My grandfather’s journal exists
now in nine languages and I consider my mission completed. The most
valuable in the series of translations, however, for me is the Turkish
one and I say: ‘More power to Mr. Ragib Zarakolu, the brave publisher
and journalist, the hero, who stands up against censorship and for
freedom of expression in Turkey.’ When the book was distributed in
Turkey, Mr. Zarakolu informed me that he was summoned to appear before
the general prosecutor. Today’s Turkish authorities dread Dr. Garabed
Hatcherian’s journal because it refutes the Turkish apologists’ thesis
according to which the steps taken in 1915 against the Armenians were
normal precautionary measures in a state of war, reciprocating the
aggressive actions of the Armenians siding on Turkey’s eastern border
with the Russian enemy. Most importantly, because it shows that Kemal
Ataturk, the founder of today’s Turkey, carried out the Young Turks’
program by eliminating the entire Armenian community in and around
Smyrna. At the present time, Mr. Zarakolu faces a new trial. We all
should support him in his strife to reform Turkish society.” Sakayan
then talked about her uncle Hovhannes (89) and her aunt Vartuhee
(84), Dr. Hatcherian’s two children, both citizens of Argentina, both
survivors of the Smyrna catastrophe, who lived to see their father’s
work coming home. She then said with emotion: “For us, Armenians around
the world, the time for crying and lamenting is over. It is now time
to show firm resolve and strength.” She was very much impressed by
the two-day (April 20-21, 2005) international conference (“Ultimate
Crime, Ultimate Challenge – Human Rights and Genocide”) dedicated to
the commemoration of the 90th Anniversary of the Armenian genocide in
Yerevan. “It was an unprecedented conference: dignitaries, scholars,
human rights activists from 50 countries had come not only to condemn
the ultimate crime of genocide, but also to discuss the ultimate
challenges of truth, reconciliation and transitional justice. From
such a high-level forum, our voices can be heard and many goals can
be reached. I congratulate the organizers of this conference, and
especially the Zoryan Institute.” Those were Dora Sakayan’s closing
words. The three new editions – East Armenian, Russian and Turkish
– had been successfully launched with well-deserved praise for the
author and fervent hope for a positive impact.

–Boundary_(ID_TWpoMLNZcR0uFF/K6ONaGg)–

http://www.sci.am/about/39-genocid.html

Financial Times: Turkey still on course to join EU

Turkey still on course to join EU, says Gul
By Haig Simonian at Gottweig Abbey, Austria

Published: June 5 2005 18:05 | Last updated: June 5 2005 18:05

Turkey-EU

Turkey believes it is still on track to become a full member of the
European Union, in spite of last week’s referendum defeats for the
constitutional treaty in France and the Netherlands.

In the first comprehensive comments by a senior official, Abdullah
Gul, Turkey’s foreign minister, said potential Turkish membership
had not played a big role in the emphatic No votes.

“Turkey wasn’t the reason for a No in these referendums. It wasn’t
about full Turkish membership of the EU,” he said.

By contrast, the leaders of Austria and Slovenia, two EU member
states with the biggest doubts about Ankara’s accession, showed clear
reservations in the wake of last week’s decisions.

At the annual European Forum organised by the Lower Austria state
government, Wolfgang Schussel and Janez Jansa, the Austrian and
Slovenian leaders, were conspicuously silent about Turkey, while
stressing the need for the EU to embrace Romania, Bulgaria and the
western Balkans.

The idea of Turkish membership is deeply unpopular in Austria and
Slovenia, partly because of the predominantly Islamic state’s relative
proximity to countries on the EU’s eastern fringes.

Mr Schussel had been among those expressing caution in the run-up
to the decision to open accession talks with Ankara next October. “I
think we should go forward unemotionally, professionally and step by
step,” he said.

Mr Jansa said Turkish membership should be made subject to a
referendum, and criticised the French government for not grasping the
degree of anti-Turkish sentiment, which had helped swing the No vote
in France.

Mr Gul said: “We will continue to live up to the expectations of our
people and deliver on further reforms.”

He argued that Ankara remained committed to encouraging free speech
and addressing difficult issues in Turkey’s past, in spite of the
cancellation of an academic conference on the alleged genocide of
Armenians under the Ottoman empire.

Mr Gul said the conference, organised by Istanbul’s Bosphorus
University, had been “postponed” and that the importance of the meeting
had been exaggerated abroad, as such issues had already been widely
discussed in Turkey.

The conference, bitterly attacked by Turkish nationalists and a senior
minister, had been widely seen as a breakthrough on what has been a
taboo subject.

Armenians, backed by a number of governments, describe the events
of 1915 as a genocide in which up to 1.5m people were killed. Turkey
recognises large numbers died, but alleges atrocities took place on
both sides and puts these in the context of the chaos of the first
world war and the twilight of the Ottoman empire.

http://news.ft.com/cms/s/16be8aa8-d5e2-11d9-8040-00000e2511c8.html

NKR: Meeting In NKR Government

MEETING IN NKR GOVERNMENT

Azat Artsakh – Nagorno Karabakh Republic [NKR]
04 June 05

On May 30th the prime minister of NKR Anoushavan Danielian met with
the representatives of the branch of France of the pan-Armenian
foundation “Hayastan”, who are visiting the republic on a charity
mission. The head of the government emphasized the role of the Armenian
Diaspora in overcoming the consequences of the war, reconstruction
of the ruined settlements and solution of the social and economic
problems. He thanked the guests for their contribution to raising
money for the construction of the highway “North-South”, emphasizing
that along with the Armenians of France, the French people also
contributed to this campaign for Artsakh, for they have always had
a special attitude toward Armenia, the Armenians and Artsakh. As
there were also French people present at the meeting, the prime
minister of Armenia thanked the government of France and the French
people too. “The Armenians of Artsakh never forget that in such a
crucial period the Diaspora supports Artsakh economically and morally,
contributing to strengthening the independence of NKR,” said Anoushavan
Danielian. “Visiting Drmbon today, you, probably, became convinced
that life there regains its normal course. The village that had been
razed to the ground during the war has completely changed, and has
good prospects for progress. Nearly 1000 people are employed in the
factory, mainly the young people from the neighbouring villages. The
new school building of the village was opened on the day of celebration
of the Last Bell as the best present to the pupils and the staff
of the school. All this is the result of the intensive roadworks
on the highway road “North-South”, which you witnessed during your
trip.” The participants of the meeting discussed several questions on
the home and foreign policies of the country, particularly referring
to the resolution of the NKR conflict. It was mentioned that the
pipeline Baku-Geihan is a powerful economic leverage in the hands of
Azerbaijan, and it was asked what potential for economic development
Nagorno Karabakh possesses. In reference to this A. Danielian said,
“We have every possibility to build a free, independent, democratic
state which will be the pride of our nation. Many compare Karabakh
to Switzerland – a country which is not rich in natural resources
either. I am sure that a democratic country which is guided by
liberal concepts and defends the human rights has better prospect
for development than a tyranny, rich in natural resources.” The
guests wanted to know the opinion of the prime minister concerning
the referendum on the Constitution of Europe. A. Danielian said,
“I think, if the referendum on the Constitution of the European Union
were held in the countries of “older Europe”, France would not be
the only country to vote against it. The problem is, in my opinion,
that older Europe launched the process of enlargement which is a
heavy load for it too early, for the countries of older Europe are
the “trailer” of the European Union. Nevertheless, I am sure, Europe
will find a way out of this puzzle with more realistic approaches,”
emphasized the NKR prime minister.

AA. 04-06-2005

Talks with Turkey should be cancelled, German politician says

Talks with Turkey should be cancelled, German politician says

02.06.2005 11:29

YEREVAN (YERKIR) – German Christian Social Union Party (CSU) federal
assembly group Chair Michael Glos said they believe discussions
regarding Turkey’s bid should be resumed.

He noted the decision to start membership negotiations with Turkey
on October 3 should be retracted. The negative outcome of the French
referendum stems from the perspective of Turkey’s EU membership to
a large extent, according to Glos.

Former Russian forces commander in Georgia unhappy about pullout

Former Russian forces commander in Georgia unhappy about pullout
14:31

RIA Novosti, Russia
June 2 2005

MOSCOW, June 2 (RIA Novosti) – Withdrawing its military bases from
Georgia is a major geopolitical loss for Russia, says Lieutenant
General Yuri Netkachev, who once served as deputy commander of
Russia’s Task Force in the Transcaucasia, Voyenno-Promyshlenny Kuryer,
a weekly, reported.

“They will sweep off our bases, and the Turks, or Americans, or
whoever will come after us. The niche will be filled,” he told the
Russian defense weekly.

Netkachev complained about the lack of a consistent state policy in
the post-Soviet territories for the last decade. Georgian President
Mikhail Saakashvili offends Russia and its citizens, imposes various
restrictions on the Russian military in Georgia, while Moscow just
says it will fire back with sanctions and never does, he said.

“At first we said it will take us 11 years to go, now we have agreed to
four years,” he said, adding the pullout from Batumi and Akhalkalaki,
where the two Russian bases are deployed, will be far from smooth.

“The locals will just not let us go. Akhalkalaki is a mostly
Armenian-populated place, and they would rather separate from Georgia
than let the people and equipment return to Russia. The same thing
can be said for Batumi. Our bases there mean jobs for people, a factor
of stability.”

Netkachev predicts that Saakashvili will wage war on Georgia’s
breakaway provinces of South Ossetia and Abkhazia before the ink
dries on the pullout agreement.

“With his hands untied, Saakashvili will begin war first against
South Ossetia, then with Abkhazia,” he said. “Is this not why he
has tripled his military budget? They are buying tanks, warplanes,
helicopters, which all promise a big war in the future. The Ossetians
and the Abkhaz will never let go of their land in Georgia.”

Netkachev said most people living in these provinces have Russian
citizenship.

The 3,000-man Russian task force deployed in Georgia has 150 battle
tanks, 240 armored vehicles and 140 artillery systems.

EU-sought penal code takes effect in Turkey despite criticism

EU-sought penal code takes effect in Turkey despite criticism

KurdishMedia, UK
June 2 2005

01/06/2005 AFP

ANKARA, June 1 (AFP) – 10h19 – Turkey’s new penal code, a key reform
demanded by the European Union, took effect Wednesday after months of
political wrangling and despite criticism that it severely restricts
press freedoms.

Controversy has haunted the code ever since the government rushed it
through parliament last September as part of reforms that helped Turkey
win an EU green light for accession talks scheduled to start this fall.

The law has been welcomed for introducing a more liberal criminal
justice system, in particular increasing penalties against human
rights abuses and torture and significantly improving the rights of
women and children.

But some parts, notably those concerning the media, triggered a
widespread campaign against the law, forcing Ankara to put it on
hold just days before it was due to take effect on April 1 to allow
parliament time to amend several provisions.

Parliament passed the amendments last week, but President Ahmet Necdet
Sezer, who has two weeks to study the articles, had not signed them
into law by midnight Tuesday, which means the code took effect in
its original form.

Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul played down the prospect of Sezer
vetoing the amendments, insisting that the main reforms demanded by
the EU were part of the code’s original version.

“The issues of concern to the EU — in other words, provisions related
to the (EU) political criteria — have already been amended,” Gul said.

Turkish newspapers greeted the new code with protests and scepticism.

“Freedom of the press is in danger,” declared the daily Aksam, while
Milliyet headlined: “Sour start to a new era.”

The Radikal newspaper lashed out at the government for failing to
address the complaints of press groups, which argue that under the new
code, journalists may still end up behind bars although jail sentences
were purged from the press law in an earlier reform last year.

Experts say articles concerning the media contain terms vague enough
to leave prosecutors and judges with room for arbitrary decisions
that may threaten freedom of expression.

One article of particular concern foresees up to 15 years imprisonment
for those who disseminate propaganda via the media against “fundamental
national interests” in return for material benefits from foreigners.

The article raised alarm when it emerged that explanatory notes in
the draft said it targets those who may, for instance, advocate the
withdrawal of Turkish troops from Cyprus or support claims that the
massacre of Armenians under the Ottoman Empire was genocide.

Press groups also say provisions pertaining to the protection of
privacy and the secrecy of judicial proceedings until suspects are
formally charged are too restrictive and will deal a heavy blow to
investigative journalism.

Putin’s greetings conveyed to Kocharyan

PUTIN’S GREETINGS CONVEYED TO KOCHARYAN

A1plus

| 18:14:17 | 31-05-2005 | Official |

Today Robert Kocharyan received head of the Russian presidential
administration Dmitry Medvedev. The parties discussed the present stage
of the Armenian-Russian cooperation and specifically the expansion
of economic ties.

Robert Kocharyan noted the dynamic development of the Armenian-Russian
relations especially in view of active Russian investments in the
Armenian economy.

Dmitry Medvedev conveyed to the Armenian President Vladimir Putin’s
greetings and informed that certain work has been carried out for
the realization of agreements achieved during the Presidents’ meeting
in March.