Samtskhe-Javakheti Armenians Step Up Demands Amid Base Talks

Georgia: Samtskhe-Javakheti Armenians Step Up Demands Amid Base Talks
By Jean-Christophe Peuch

Radio Free Europe, Czech Republic
May 5 2005

Russian soldiers in Georgia

Political groupings in Georgia’s predominantly Armenian region of
Samtskhe-Javakheti have in recent weeks staged a series of rallies to
protest against the possible withdrawal of Russian troops stationed
there. Although the timing suggests Moscow may have inspired the
demonstrations as it faces renewed pressure to vacate a military base
in the region, experts note that Georgian President Mikheil
Saakashvili’s failure to address social and economic concerns has
many residents worried.

Prague, 5 May 2005 (RFE/RL) — Visiting Tbilisi last week,
Armenia’s Parliament Speaker Artur Baghdasarian commented on
reports that tensions were once again brewing in Georgia’s southern
Samtskhe-Javakheti region.

“We believe all citizens of the unified Georgian state — be they
Armenians, Russians, or Georgians — must abide by the laws of this
country. But at the same time we must admit that in every society there
are various moods and we [must] accept this calmly,” Baghdasarian said.

Ever since the breakup of the Soviet Union, Samtskhe-Javakheti has
been a thorn in Tbilisi’s side.

Successive invasions and population transfers have turned this center
of Georgian history and culture into a melting pot of nationalities.

Once Samtskhe-Javakheti’s dominant ethnic group, Georgians now
represent a minority there. Armenians, who account for more than
one-half of the population, largely outnumber them.

The region’s ethnic composition is not Tbilisi’s sole concern.
Considering this area a highly sensitive zone, Soviet authorities set
up one of their main military outposts in the Southern Caucasus there.

Located in Akhalkalaki, just 30 kilometers from Turkey, the base is
now the property of Russia — and a major bone of contention between
Moscow and Tbilisi.

Georgia has long suspected Russia of covertly stirring unrest among
local residents.

Following the change of leadership that took place in Tbilisi in late
2003, calls for the region’s autonomy somehow subsided. Political
groupings such as Virk, or Javakh — which were extremely vocal in the
final years of former Georgian President Eduard Shevardnadze’s rule —
hoped his successor would pay greater attention to Samtskhe-Javakheti’s
demands.

But despite President Mikheil Saakashvili’s repeated pledges to tackle
the region’s socioeconomic problems, the past 17 months have brought
little improvement — if any — to local residents.

Arnold Stepanian chairs a Tbilisi nongovernmental organization known
as Multinational Georgia. He tells RFE/RL that, for Georgia’s ethnic
minority groups, the regime change went largely unnoticed.

“It’s difficult to say that we’re dissatisfied with the national
integration policy conducted by the government because, unfortunately,
there is no such policy. We can’t even say there is a bad policy. To
be honest, there’s never been a national integration policy in
Georgia. There’ve been attempts to get the nongovernmental sector
involved in these issues. Some of these attempts have succeeded. But
the government has yet to elaborate a national integration policy,”
Stepanian said.

On 28 April, Multinational Georgia and other nongovernmental groups
sent Saakashvili an open letter, in which they criticize his national
policy.

This letter cautions against purported government plans to revise
Georgia’s administrative borders without taking into account the
delicate ethnic balance of its regions. It also demands that minority
groups enjoy better access to education in their native language,
and that non-ethnic Georgians be fairly represented in national
parliament and self-government bodies.

These calls follow reports of ethnic unrest in the predominantly ethnic
Armenian Tsalka district, an area of the Kvemo-Kartli region that
borders Samtskhe-Javakheti to the east. They also coincide with renewed
activity on the part of Samtskhe-Javakheti’s political organizations.

On 29 April, Saakashvili went to Ninotsminda, an ethnic Armenian city
located a few kilometers southeast of Akhalkalaki. The Georgian leader
promised residents he would personally see that a new Armenian school
is built by the beginning of the next school year.

“My wife was here a few weeks ago and she told me about the current
condition of the school. We’ve therefore decided that new foundations
should be built and that construction should be completed by 1
September so that all children get a new school. I promise I’ll come
for the inauguration with books, satchels, and many other gifts for
you,” Saakashvili said.

Saakashvili also called upon residents, most of whom depend on
agriculture for a living, to show patience until a new road linking
Ninotsminda to the rest of Georgia is built.

“You must understand that we subsidize everything here. We’re building
a road for you and we will help you with transportation until this
road is finished. Transportation is expensive [but] you will have
no problem reaching our [Tbilisi] markets. Not only will I give you
a school this year, but, most importantly, I will take you to our
markets,” Saakashvili said.

Stepanian fears that, as Saakashvili’s earlier pledges, these promises
may have no effect.

Last month, a newly created youth group known as United Javakh
organized a rally in Akhalkalaki that attracted several hundred
protestors.

This first demonstration, which was followed by others, was held to
protest against Georgia’s calls for the Russian military base to be
vacated as quickly as possible.

Whether the timing of these rallies — which took place in the
midst of uneasy Georgian-Russian talks — was purely coincidental,
or inspired by Moscow, remains unclear.

Stepanian says he has no answer to this question.

“It’s always difficult to talk about things you don’t know for sure
and in the present case I don’t know whether there is a link here.
But the timing, the fact that these rallies took place during the
[Russian-Georgian] negotiation process, is interesting,” Stepanian
said.

Russia’s Akhalkalaki base is mainly manned by local Armenian soldiers
and employs roughly one-sixth of the town’s 13,000 residents. In all,
more than half of the local population is said to depend, directly
or indirectly, on the base for its livelihood.

Although the base’s true economic value for the town remains to be
quantified, residents claim the departure of the Russian troops would
deprive them of their main source of income.

Georgian authorities say these concerns are unfounded. But they’re
sending contradictory signals on how they envisage the town’s economic
future.

A month ago, Saakashvili said on television that Georgian troops
will move into the base after the Russians leave. But, last week,
he appeared to have changed his mind.

“We’re not planning to set up a new military unit [there]. But we will
offer those who serve on this base to join the Georgian armed forces
in return for a higher pay. To those who turn down this proposal,
we will offer a separate social-rehabilitation program, business
[training]. These people must not feel they will lose out on the
deal. On the contrary, they must benefit from the fact that Georgia
is developing,” Saakashvili said.

Meanwhile, Georgia’s Defense Minister Irakli Okruashvili on 2 May
warned that the government would soon take action against what those
who “are pursuing anti-Georgian activities in Samtskhe-Javakheti.”

But Stepanian says any further delay in addressing the demands of
Georgia’s minorities is fraught with risk, as recent Armenian-Georgian
clashes in Tsalka district show.

AGBU Paris Sponsors Symposium With Jean-Pierre =?UNKNOWN?Q?Mah=E9?=

AGBU Press Office
55 East 59th Street
New York, NY 10022-1112
Phone 212.319.6383 x.118
Fax 212.319.6507
Email [email protected]
Website

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Wednesday, May 4, 2005

AGBU PARIS SPONSORS SYMPOSIUM WITH JEAN-PIERRE MAHÉ

Paris, France – On March 23rd, 2005, AGBU Paris sponsored a
symposium with Jean-Pierre Mahé, renowned scholar on Armenia and
member of the French Academy, at the European Parliament Office in
Paris. Under the patronage of Marie-Anne Isler-Béguin, President of
the European Parliament (EU) delegation for the Southern Caucasus,
Mahé reviewed Armenian culture and history from the point of view of
their contribution to European culture and history.

AGBU Paris is dedicated to preserving and promoting the Armenian
heritage and culture through humanitarian, educational, and cultural
programs in France and Armenia. To view the complete conference
transcript, please visit For more information on AGBU
Paris, please e-mail [email protected] or call (33) (1) 45-20-03-18.

For more information on AGBU and its worldwide chapters, please
visit

–Boundary_(ID_ewU7ZtAiZZlS8WMpiVplgg)–

www.agbu.org
www.ugab.info.
www.agbu.org.

A-bomb for authorities

A1plus

| 13:35:42 | 30-04-2005 | Politics |

A-BOMB FOR AUTHORITIES

With the strict position of the people and one item fixed in the
Constitution we could avoid the implementation of card system, prevent the
cutting of green plantations and building up of these territories with
cafes, avoid unnecessary rise in prices and so on.

The people should have the right to initiate referenda. A few weeks ago a
civic union named «People- master of the county» and headed by vice chairman
of the National Democratic Union Alexander Butayev was formed. «As the
existence of an atomic bomb allows the country to keep the enemy at
distance, the existence of an item of the Constitution will play a
restrictive role. If the authorities are aware of this «threat» they will
have to work more effectively», Alexander Butayev says.

The initiators of the Civic Union hope the people will have the possibility
to hold referenda with the essential number of signatures. However, under
the present condition the referenda initiated by the people can become
weekly. Nevertheless, Butayev adheres to a different opinion. He is
convinced that it will not be easy to collect the fixed number of
signatures. The demands should be realistic first of all.

The exercise of the right depends on the activities of the government.
However members of the Civic Union consider that the periodicity can be
fixed in a separate law. Alexander Butayev does not mind the Government’s
veto in case the issue initiated for a referendum is pointless.

It is known that the Civic Union is supported by chairman of the National
Democratic Union Vazgen Manukyan, chairman of the National
Self-Determination Union Paruyr Hayrikyan, representative of the Forum of
Intellectuals Ashot Manucharyan. The Justice bloc is also likely to join the
initiative.

Lena Badeyan

Governor’s initiative saved elephant calf

The Hindu
April 29, 2005

GOVERNOR’S INITIATIVE SAVED ELEPHANT CALF

Special Correspondent

Although it was the intervention of the Prime Minister, Manmohan
Singh, which in the ultimate saved the young she-elephant Veda of the
Bannerghatta National Park near here from being trans-located to the
cold and unfamiliar climes of Armenia, the Governor, T.N. Chaturvedi,
too had a role in it.

Reacting to a report from New Delhi in The Hindu of Thursday about
the decision against gifting the elephant to Armenia, the Raj Bhavan
here noted that Compassion Unlimited Plus Action had represented to
the Governor opposing the Centre’s decision to transfer the elephant
to the Yerevan Zoo in Armenia as the “elephant calf cannot withstand
the extreme cold climate of Armenia and it may prove fatal for it”.

Mr. Chaturvedi wrote to the Prime Minister about the decision. Ten
days later, the Prime Minister replied saying: “I have received your
letter of April 11, 2005. My Government has examined the issue and it
has been decided not to send Veda to Armenia”.

BAKU: Azerbaijanis hold rally of protest in Switzerland

AzerTag, Azerbaijan
April 28 2005

AZERBAIJANIS HOLD RALLY OF PROTEST IN SWITZERLAND
[April 28, 2005, 14:23:03]

The Sweden-Azerbaijan Turks Association on 24 April has hold in Bern
a rally of protest against `genocide’ claims of the Armenians, State
Committee on Works with Azerbaijanis Living Abroad said.

In the 4-hour action, were raised slogans exposing intention of the
Armenians without any historical ground.

Participants of the rally – Azerbaijani country-fellows have adopted
an address to prove groundless claims of the notorious `genocide’.
The document was sent to state bodies, Parliament and public
organizations of Switzerland.

Many Swiss media organs have covered the action.

Will Arca bring suit against Armentel

A1plus

| 18:47:33 | 28-04-2005 | Social |

WILL ARCA BRING SUIT AGAINST ARMENTEL?

Not long ago when replacing wires of the 44th telephone station Armentel has
blocked the cash machines of the ArCa system. Today the 5-th birthday of the
company was celebrated in the Central Bank.

During a press conference ArCa Executive Director Shahen Hovhannisyan stated
that the company might bring a suit against Armentel. He also informed that
a system of joining the wires of the cash machines with each other and the
center located in the Shengavit community can be created.

To date, 14 banks of Armenia are members of ArCa system and two more banks
are willing to enter it presently. ArCa itself is integrated into the system
of MasterCard and VISA and provides services to the members of the system.

ANKARA: Turkey insists genocide campaign obstructs normalized ties

Turkish Press
April 27 2005

Turkey insists genocide campaign obstructs normalizing ties with
Armenia

ANKARA – Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Wednesday
an Armenian campaign to have the massacre of Armenians by Ottoman
Turks recognized internationally as genocide is an obstacle to
establishing formal relations between the two neighbors.

“Before we make a political decision (on normalizing ties), there is
a very important issue that should be resolved and this is the
problems stemming from history,” Erdogan told reporters.

He was commenting on a letter from Armenian President Robert
Kocharian, who accepted in principle a Turkish proposal to create a
joint committee to study the genocide allegations but that Ankara
should first normalize relations with Yerevan without pre-conditions.

Turkey demands that Armenia abandon its campaign for the recognition
of the World War I massacres as genocide before formal diplomatic
relations can be established between the two countries.

In 1993, Turkey also shut its border with Armenia in a show of
solidarity with its close ally Azerbaijan, which was at war with
Armenia, dealing a heavy economic blow on the impoverished nation.

Erdogan stressed Turkey had opened its archives to all historians to
study whether the massacres constituted a genocide, and urged Yerevan
to follow suit.

“Why don’t they open their archives? It is very curious,” he said.

“Let historians and experts work in the archives. If the outcome of
these studies require us to question our history, we will do that,”
he said.

Armenians say up to 1.5 million of their kinsmen perished in
deportations and orchestrated killings between 1915 and 1917.

Ankara argues that 300,000 Armenians and at least as many Turks died
in what was civil strife during World War I when the Armenians took
up arms for independence in eastern Anatolia and sided with Russian
troops invading the crumbling Ottoman Empire.

Armenians across the world Sunday marked the 90th anniversary of the
beginning of the massacres, which have already been recognized as
genocide by a number of countries.

Ankara fears that the genocide allegations could fuel anti-Turkish
sentiment in international public opinion at a time when it is vying
for membership in the European Union.

Some EU politicans are also pressing Turkey to address the genocide
claims in what Ankara sees a politically-motivated campaign to impede
its EU bid.

Security council within the constitution

A1plus

| 12:36:36 | 25-04-2005 | Social |

SECURITY COUNCIL WITHIN THE CONSTITUTION

«What should the Security Council status be?», this was the poll question of
the «A1+» internet site this week. 233 people participated in it. The
majority – 57.9% think that its status must be envisaged by the
Constitution.

20.6% think that it must be a purely consultational body, and 12.4% think it
should not exist at all. For 9% it is all the same what the Security Council
status will be.

This week the site poll will try to find out if the deputy immunity should
be cancelled or not.

Genocide armenien – Paris maintient l’ambiguite

Génocide arménien
Paris maintient l’ambiguïté

Favorable à l’adhésion turque à l’UE, Chirac soigne aussi les
Arméniens de France, ne négligeant aucune voix pour le référendum du
29 mai.

Par Antoine GUIRAL

lundi 25 avril 2005 (Liberation – 06:00)

Jacques Chirac, c’est bien connu, est l’ami de tous. Donc des Turcs,
mais aussi des Arméniens. En recevant en fin de semaine dernière à
Paris son homologue arménien Robert Kotcharian, le chef de l’Etat
français a souhaité que l’Arménie «poursuive son dialogue avec
Ankara», notamment sur la question du génocide. De manière très
symbolique, les deux hommes se sont rendus dans le VIIIe
arrondissement pour déposer une gerbe au pied du monument arménien
dédié tout à la fois au musicien Komitas, aux victimes du génocide et
aux combattants arméniens morts pour la France.

Favorable à l’adhésion de la Turquie à l’Union européenne, le
président de la République cherche à montrer qu’il ne transige pas
avec les principes. Ses proches soulignent qu’il peut se permettre de
tout dire aux Turcs. Vendredi, il a ainsi rappelé que cette éventuelle
entrée dans l’UE passerait immanquablement pour Ankara par un «devoir
de mémoire» sur le génocide arménien. Pour autant, Jacques Chirac se
refuse à pointer plus ouvertement la responsabilité turque. En 2001,
le Parlement a adopté une loi qui stipule que la France reconnaît le
génocide arménien. Mais elle ne précise pas qui en sont les
coupables. Cette ambiguïté est révélatrice de l’attitude de la France
qui a toujoursvoulu ménager la susceptibilité turque.

Quoi qu’il en soit, la communauté arménienne de France (la plus
importante d’Europe) a apprécié le geste de Chirac. «Un événement très
important», a ainsi assuré Ara Toranian, président du Conseil de
coordination des organisations arméniennes de France. Alors que le non
au référendum du 29 mai est donné gagnant, le Président ne néglige
rien pour grappiller les voix susceptibles d’inverser cette
tendance. Les Français d’origine arménienne lui sauront-ils gré
d’avoir pour la première fois honoré de sa présence leur monument
auxmorts ? Jamais en reste pour prendre le contre-pied de Jacques
Chirac, Nicolas Sarkozy a assuré que son opposition à l’adhésion de la
Turquie dans l’UE «n’était pas liée» à la reconnaissance du génocide
par Ankara mais à son«idée de l’Europe qui doit avoir des frontières
et des relations avec ceux qui ne sont pas européens».

Turkey must repudiate its policy of denial

Daily Star – Lebanon
April 26 2005

Turkey must repudiate its policy of denial
Commentary by
By Charles Tannock

Tuesday, April 26, 2005

All wars end, eventually. But memories of atrocity never seem to
fade, as the government-fanned anti-Japanese riots that took place
last week in China remind us. The 90th anniversary of the Armenian
massacres of 1915, which was commemorated on Sunday, and that was
ordered by the ruling Young Turks of the Ottoman Empire and carried
out by the Kurds, is another wound that will not heal, but one that
must be treated if Turkey’s progress toward European Union membership
is to proceed smoothly.

Most people still know little about that dark episode. It is hard for
most of us to imagine the scale of suffering and devastation
inflicted on the Armenian people and their ancestral homelands. But
many members of today’s thriving global Armenian diaspora have direct
ancestors who perished, and carry an oral historical tradition that
keeps the memories burning.

It is particularly ironic that many Kurds from Turkey’s southeastern
provinces, having been promised Armenian property and a guaranteed
place in heaven for killing infidels, were willingly complicit in the
genocide. They later found themselves on the losing end of a long
history of violence between their own separatist forces and the
Turkish Army, as well as being subjected to an ongoing policy of
discrimination and forced assimilation.

Historically, the ancient Christian Armenians were amongst the most
progressive people in the East, but in the 19th century Armenia was
divided between the Ottoman Empire and Russia. Sultan Abdul Hamid II
organized the massacres of 1895-97, but it was not until the spring
of 1915, under the cover of the World War I, that the Young Turks’
nationalistic government found the political will to execute a true
genocide.

Initially, Armenian intellectuals were arrested and executed in
public hangings in groups of 50-100. Ordinary Armenians were thus
deprived of their leaders and soon after were massacred, with many
burned alive. Approximately 500,000 were killed in the last seven
months of 1915, with the majority of the survivors deported to desert
areas in Syria, where they died from either starvation or disease. It
is estimated that 1.5 million people perished.

Recently, the Armenian diaspora has been calling on Turkey to face up
to its past and recognize its historic crime. Turkey’s official line
remains that the allegation is based on unfounded or exaggerated
claims, and that the deaths that occurred resulted from combat
against Armenians collaborating with invading Russian forces during
the world war; or as a result of disease and hunger during the forced
deportations. Moreover, the local Turkish population allegedly
suffered similar casualties.

Turkey thus argues that the charge of genocide is designed to
besmirch its honor and impede its progress toward EU accession. There
are also understandable fears that diverging from the official line
would trigger a flood of compensation claims, as occurred against
Germany.

For many politicians, particularly in America, there is an
unwillingness to upset Turkey without strong justification, given its
record as a loyal NATO ally and putative EU candidate country. But,
despite almost half a century of membership in the Council of Europe
– ostensibly a guardian of human rights, including freedom of speech
and conscience – Turkey still punishes as a crime against national
honor any suggestion that the Armenian genocide is a historic truth.
Fortunately, the relevant article of Turkey’s penal code is now due
for review and possible repeal.

Indeed, broader changes are afoot in Turkey. The press and
government, mindful of the requirements of EU membership, are finally
opening the sensitive Armenian issue to debate. Even Prime Minister
Recep Tayyip Erdogan, under increasing EU pressure as accession
negotiations in October near, has agreed to an impartial study by
historians, although he has reiterated his belief that the genocide
never occurred. In France, the historical occurrence of the Armenian
genocide is enshrined in law, and denial of its occurrence is
condemned in the same way as denial of the Jewish Holocaust.

The European Parliament is pressing for Turkish recognition of the
Armenian genocide. It is also calling for an end to the trade embargo
by Turkey and its close ally Azerbaijan against the Republic of
Armenia, a reopening of frontiers, and a land-for-peace deal to
resolve the territorial dispute over Nagorno Karabakh in Azerbaijan
and to safeguard its Armenian identity.

Armenia, an independent country since 1991, remains dependent on
continued Russian protection, as was the case in 1920 when it joined
the Soviet Union rather than suffer further Turkish invasion. This is
not healthy for the development of Armenia’s democracy and weak
economy. Nor does Armenia’s continued dependence on Russia bode well
for regional cooperation, given the deep resentment of Russian
meddling in neighboring Georgia and Azerbaijan.

There is only one way forward for Turkey, Armenia and the region. The
future will begin only when Turkey – like Germany in the past and
Serbia and Croatia now – repudiates its policy of denial and faces up
to its terrible crimes of 1915. Only then can the past truly be past.

Charles Tannock is chairman of the European Parliament’s Human Rights
Committee.

This commentary is published by THE DAILY STAR in collaboration with
Project Syndicate ().

www.project-syndicate.org