Georgians Attack Turks

Agency WPS
DEFENSE and SECURITY (Russia)
August 9, 2004, Monday

GEORGIANS ATTACK TURKS

SOURCE: Novye Izvestia, August 4, 2004, p. 4

by Oleg Kasimov

UNSOLVED PROBLEM OF ABKHAZIA GENERATES FRICTION IN THE
GEORGIAN-TURKISH RELATIONS

Relations between Georgia and Turkey plummeted last Saturday because
of the incident off the coast of Abkhazia. Boat of the Georgian coast
guard opened fire at the Turkish dry cargo ship that crossed the
Georgian territorial waters and was bound for Sukhumi. The ship was
damaged but not detained. Abkhazian State Security Minister Mikhail
Tarba said that the Abkhazian will sink every Georgian ship in their
territorial waters. The minister even mentioned the use of aviation
whenever necessary.

Shortly before that Abkhazian leaders terminated negotiations with
Tbilisi. The statement to this effect was made the day following the
end of military exercise run by the self-proclaimed republic where
15,000 men including reservists were involved. Tbilisi appraised the
exercise as an element of preparations for an all-out war on Georgia.

The situation being what it is, official Ankara did not respond to
the attack on the Turkish ship. This was only logical. These days,
Turkey, Georgia, and Azerbaijan are building a military-political
axis as a counterweight to another geopolitical construction – the
Russian-Armenian-Iranian triangle. With Washington’s support, Ankara
is rapidly building the Baku – Tbilisi – Dheijkhan pipeline that will
bring Caspian oil to the world market via Georgia and Turkey.
Moreover, Turkey has been providing military aid to Georgia. A
platoon of Georgian peacekeepers has been in Kosovo as a subunit of
the Turkish contingent since 1999.

The unsolved problem of Abkhazia generates friction in the relations
between Tbilisi and Ankara. Turkey recognizes territorial integrity
of Georgia and frowns on Abkhazia’s attempts to cede. In the
meantime, Turkish ships regularly violate the Georgian sea border and
bring food and goods to Abkhazia, something Georgia inevitably calls
smuggled goods. Georgian secret services even compiled a list of 19
ships making regular runs to Abkhazia and sent it to Ankara. Turkey
did not respond. Experts believe that Ankara’s position on the
subject of Abkhazia is influenced to a considerable extent by the
Abkhazian diaspora in Turkey. The diaspora numbers about 400,000
people, descendants from the makhadzhirs (this is how the Ottoman
Empire called the Abkhazians who fled there during the Caucasus War
in the 19th century). Most of them became Moslems in Turkey.

In the early 1990’s, the authorities of Abkhazia appealed to these
men to come home promising living quarters and free education. The
decision to build two mosques, in Gudauta and Sukhumi, was made then.
The process of repatriation was quite rapid at first: hundreds
families returned to Abkhazia. The number of Moslems in Abkhazia
soared. According to the latest opinion polls, 49.3% residents of
Abkhazia call themselves Christians and 28.7% Moslems. Ankara is
closely watching the situation in Abkhazia nowadays, emphasizing its
concern for the makhadzhir families that returned to Abkhazia. It is
with Ankara’s silent consent that Turkish ships regularly bring fuel
and food to the region. Ankara is financing schools in Abkhazia where
students are taught in the Turkish language. Turkish ambassador to
Georgia visited Abkhazia this June. “Ankara is not disinterested in
the processes taking place in Abkhazia,” he said.

It goes without saying that in its confrontation with the authorities
of Georgia Sukhumi counts on the Abkhazian lobby in Turkey that is
trying to wield its clout with regard to the policy of official
Ankara. Last October, former finance minister of Turkey Zekiriat
Emizel visited Sukhumi (Emizel is an Abkhazian himself). He promised
leaders of Abkhazia to use his political clout to have official
Ankara and general public to turn to the Abkhazian problems.

Translated by A. Ignatkin

Collapse of the old order

The Advertiser, Australia
August 7, 2004 Saturday

Collapse of the old order

by Chris Brice

A WRIST-SNAPPING, 625-page swirling epic of love and war, tenderness
and savagery, BIRDS WITHOUT WINGS (Secker & Warburg, $49.95) is Louis
de Bernieres’s first major work since his celebrated Captain
Corelli’s Mandolin was published a decade ago.

Bernieres has said that the reason for the long sigh between the
novels is that he didn’t want to write “Captain Corelli twice”.

So the conflict is World War I rather than World War II, and the
action has moved from a Greek island to the coast of Turkey.

But there is a comforting familiarity about aromas of pine and olive
groves wafting across rough-hewn hillsides to the vivid waters of the
Aegean, though this time to “where it merges with the Mediterranean”.

Essentially, Birds Without Wings is the story of the last years of
the Ottoman Empire and the birth of Turkey during the first two
decades of the 20th century.

It is told through the hop-scotching narratives of the inhabitants of
Eskibahce, a village in southwest Anatolia.

There, Muslims and Christians, Greeks, Turks and Armenians live in
tolerant harmony – even if Christians are called “dogs” or
“infidels”, it is “said with a smile, just as were their deprecatory
terms for us” – until divisions in the larger world are imposed and
the old order painfully collapses.

The novel’s emotional heart is the doomed chaste love affair of
beautiful Christian girl Philothei and Muslim goatherd Ibrahim.

In the end, Birds Without Wings has just enough highlights – prime
among them a powerful memoir of the defence of Gallipoli against the
invading Allies – to keep it afloat against the weight of a biography
of Mustafa Kemal, later Kemal Ataturk, father of the Turkish nation,
which drones through 20 or more interspersed chapters.

Boxing at Quiet Cannon!

Boxing News
Aug 6 2004

Boxing at Quiet Cannon!

August 6, 2004

By Francisco Salazar

Boxing returns to the Quiet Cannon in Montebello, CA tonight as All
Star Boxing presents a six bout card loaded with action.

In the main event, Bantamweight Karen Hartyunyan will face
hard-hitting Gilberto Bolanos in an eight round fight. The bout
headlines a “Battle of the Rising Stars” card.

Hartyunyan, (11-1-3) from Glendale, CA by way of Yerevan, Armenia, is
undefeated in his last 12 fights. Hartyunyan has not lost a fight in
almost four years, when he lost by a four round majority decision to
Sergio Espinoza.

In his last fight, Hartyunyan defeated Romel Aguilar by an eight
round unanimous decision in June in Irvine, CA. Hartyunyan once wrote
Fightnews.com

Hartyunyan, who mostly fights at Super Bantamweight, makes for
exciting fights and always gives it his all in every fight.

Bolanos, (9-7-1, 9 KO’s) from Ciudad Obregon, Sonora, Mexico, is
coming off a majority draw against undefeated Rudy Dominguez last
month in Temecula, CA.

Bolanos has faced some of the talented prospects in the lower weight
classes. He hopes to upset the young Hartyunyan on Friday night.

In the co-feature, Tia Greenberg will face Ku’ulei Kupihea In a fur
round female Welterweight bout.

Greenburg, (1-2, 1 KO) from Huntington Beach, CA, will fight for the
first time in almost three years. Greenberg has not fought since
losing to Gail Muzzey in Irvine, CA.

Kuihea, (0-1) from Honolulu, HI, is looking for her first
professional victory. Her only defeat was at the Quiet Cannon last
year.

Undefeated fighters will go at it as Freddie Barrera will face
Alfonso Figueroa in a four round Lightweight bout.

Barrera, (3-0) from Colton, CA, is coming off a four round unanimous
decision victory over Alejandro Nungaray last month in Pala, CA.

Barrera has fought all of his professional fights this year and in
California.

Figueroa, (1-0) from Los Angeles, should make this an interesting
fight of undefeated fighters.

In other bouts:
– Francisco Zepeda, (1-2-2) from Los Angeles, will take on Martin
Esparza in a four round Welterweight bout. Esparza, from Los Angeles,
is 0-2.

– Joey Aragon (2-1) will take on Terry Anderson, who will be making
his professional debut in a four round Middleweight bout.

– Justin Mercado will make his professional debut against Carlos
Tovar (0-3-1) in a four round Junior Welterweight bout. Tovar is from
Fontana, CA, while Mercado is from Hawaii.

Former world title challenger and actor Art Aragon will be the
special invited guest for All Star Boxing action-packed card.

Tickets for these fights go at $35 and $50. To purchase tickets, call
All Star Boxing at (323) 837-0038 or (323) 816-6200. Doors to the
venue open at 6:30PM, with first bell scheduled for 7:30 PM.

BAKU: Armenian-proposed frontline meetings no security threat

Armenian-proposed frontline meetings no security threat – Azeri expert

Ekho, Baku
30 Jul 04

Text of R. Orucov’s report by Azerbaijani newspaper Ekho on 30 July
headlined “Personal contacts on the frontline” and subheaded “The
Armenian military offers its Azerbaijani counterparts to meet under
the aegis of the OSCE”

In conformity with the mandate of the personal representative of the
OSCE chairman-in-office, the OSCE conducted routine monitoring of the
contact line between the Armenian and Azerbaijani armed forces this
week in the vicinity of the villages of Berkaber in Armenia’s Tavush
Region and Mizamlu in Azerbaijan’s Qazax District.

According to the Regnum news agency, visual contact was established
during the monitoring mission between the OSCE representatives and
representatives of the Ministries of Defence and Foreign Affairs of
Armenia and Azerbaijan who accompanied them. The news is that the
“Armenian side again suggested changing from radio contacts to
meetings in person under the aegis of the OSCE. [OSCE
chairman-in-office’s personal] Envoy Andrzej Kasprzyk welcomed this
suggestion and expressed his hope that in the foreseeable future, the
OSCE will apply for permission to hold such a meeting.”

The greatest interest is caused by the question of why personal
meetings between the two hostile sides are needed. What does it mean
that precisely the Armenian side came up with this initiative? Could
this practice really serve the purpose of maintaining the cease-fire?
The fact that the third monitoring mission has been carried out in
this sector of the border is caused by the aggravation of the
situation here, Regnum was told at the Armenian Defence Ministry.

Yesterday it emerged that the Defence Ministry of the Republic of
Azerbaijan was unaware of this offer. The head of the Defence
Ministry’s press service, Ramiz Malikov, said in a conversation with
Ekho that he knew nothing about this and that “we should not ask for
things like this”.

Independent military expert Uzeyir Cafarov gave a positive assessment
to the prospect for contacts between the military in the frontline
area. “Any contact between the opposite sides which serves the purpose
of saving the lives of the military personnel should be
welcomed. Human lives should be saved. Agreeing to contacts with
Armenian officers out of any other considerations is inadmissible.”

The belligerents have been more or less observing the cease-fire for
10 years now, the expert noted. “But we have witnessed almost daily
shooting from the Armenian side along the frontline of late. This is
why personal contacts between the sides would not be bad for the
general atmosphere,” Cafarov said. He also said that a monitoring
mission by the OSCE representatives is one thing, and when officers
discuss the important issues in which they are interested without
mediators is another thing. “I think that the latter will be more
useful,” he added.

Cafarov reminded us that this system was practised in previous
years. “That is to say, during the OSCE monitoring missions, not only
did the sides see each other, they also communicated. Naturally, they
were standing, not sitting at a table. Officers discussed different
issues and expressed their displeasure or wishes.” The sides were
trying to use such contacts to the maximum benefit of their troops.

The expert noted that such meetings would pose no security
threats. “The point is that both our and Armenian side are very well
aware who is on the opposite side in every particular section of the
frontline – they possess almost 100-per-cent accurate information
about the commanders and types and numbers of weapons on the opposite
side.”

International Shakespeare Festival underway in Gdansk

PAP Polish Press Agency
PAP News Wire
August 2, 2004 Monday

International Shakespeare Festival underway in Gdansk

Gdansk

Shakespeare’s “Richard III,” a production
by Janusz Wisniewski in Teatr Nowy from Poznan inaugurated the
8th International Shakespeare Festival held in Gdansk from July
31 to August 8. The production was awarded the Golden Yorick
for the previous season.

The festival, organised by the Theatrum Gedanense
Foundation is recognised as one of the biggest event of this kind in
Europe.This year’s programme envisages productions by 12 theatres
from eight countries, Armenia, Estonia, Lithuania, Germany, Russia,
Romania and the USA, and Poland.

Three projects are realised during the festival thanks to
support of the European Commission: the European Shakespeare,
Shakespeare on the Baltic, and the Russian Shakespeare.

Theatre critic Andrzej Zurowski, the Theatrum Gedanense
artistic adviser and author of several books on Shakespeare
recommends especially the production of “Titus Andronicus” by Theater
an der Ruhr of Germany, directed by Roberto Ciulli of Milan,
and “Romeo and Juliet” by Russian theatre Luna with an all-men
cast.

The festival is accompanied by workshops, an international
conference on Shakespeare, panel discussions and exhibitions.

BAKU: How we lose our summits?

Bakutoday.net
July 31, 2004

How we lose our summits?

By Ulvi Ismayil, Muskie Fellow/MPP candidate
Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs,

University of Minnesota. USA

Azerbaijan indeed has beautiful landscape. I have realized it more since I
came to study in the US, the country that, along with Turkey, I used to
consider “as other two countries having beautiful landscapes after
Azerbaijan” mostly from the TV programs that I watched. My thoughts about
impeccable landscapes of “other countries” have changed since then. After
being in the US for one year I realized that the affection between you and
landscape is not because latter’s beauty but how close you are to that
landscape morally and spiritually. Now even the parts of Azerbaijan that I
labeled for myself, as the ugliest seem to me the “most beautiful sections
of the world not to be compared to anywhere else”. In short this is how you
feel when you truly love your country. You even miss the small rock from
your backyard.

Indeed, what God has withheld when creating Azerbaijan? At the high school
and even now we Azerbaijanis love remind ourselves and inform strangers that
Azerbaijan has 9 out 11 climatic zones totally existing in the globe. We
love to travel our forests, seas, and mountains especially in the recent
years. Apart from enjoying the great sightseeing of these places, we as
other nations in the world show the highest peaks and deepest points of our
country in the general data related to our country. Thus after conquering
our hearts with their beauties these landscapes now become the symbols of
our pride in annual publications, journals, travel guides related to our
country. Therefore, this landscape and data related to them is saint for
each nation and to lose them might be the biggest sin in the history of each
nation.

Nations and countries however do lose their prides. People fight and die for
them as we have seen in the world history. Some of these wars begin and end
fairly, some do not. However in both cases the peace get reached and both
sides agree with their fates. However the most painful is when you lose
object of your pride – mountain peak, lake without war or conflict, just as
you lose your wallet, set of the keys from your car, can of coke at the
party. Unfortunately, people of Azerbaijan had to face this shame too. “We”
suddenly lost the third highest peak in Azerbaijan – Mount Gapydzhik, the
highest summit of the Caucasus Minor, Zangezur Mountain Range, at the height
of 3,904 meters.

I know most of you will not believe me. Why should you? Isn’t it insane and
abnormal? I did not believe it myself at the first too while writing my
Diploma Project for Master’s degree at Baku State University in spring of
2000. I was looking at the data provided at the brochure of the EU’s TACIS
program for the three South Caucasus Republics – Armenia, Azerbaijan and
Georgia. There in the introduction part of this economy-related brochure
printed in 1996 I saw indication of highest peaks in each Republic. Well,
nothing would have surprised me in the section related to Armenia prepared
by the EC’s most prestigious program that respects the sovereignty of these
republics if I did not see Mount Gapydzhik transliterated as Kapudjuk as
second highest summit in Armenia (!) after Mount Aragats, (4090 m)

“Oh, our Armenian neighbors! Double standards of the West! You again!” I
said to myself, something that I would typically say being upraised in
Azerbaijan for the entire period of Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict over
Nagorno Karabakh. Well, I said, another misprinting or abuse I said. I do
not care. I know from my childhood, from excellent Geography teacher that I
had at high school of Soviet times that Mount Gapydzhik is in Azerbaijan.
These were the years when almost each house had the World map in the wall. I
just need to go to the next bookstore and buy the map of Azerbaijan Republic
and see my pride – Mount Gapydzhik that stands on the north of Ordubad
region, in the Zangezur range of mountains, Nakchichevan Autonous Republic,
Azerbaijan.

Well, when I reached the bookstore, I did not want to buy that map, because
there was no Mount Gapydzhik with the height of 3904 there, in the
geographic map of Azerbaijan Republic printed in 1996. It was not even on
Armenian side – Zangezur region that “enters” into Azerbaijan, the region
that first Communist boss of Azerbaijan SSR, N. Narimanov granted to Armenia
on the day of establishment of Armenia SSR – on November 29, 1920. As if the
entire massive piece of rock has melted in the extremely hot summer of
Nakhichevan, walked away or blown with the wind. If it happened in the “Day
of Judgment”, I would believe it, but not now. However, that was what map
showed to me. Instead, in the map, somewhere around the “former place” of
Gapydzhik, it suddenly showed smaller in height Mount Gazangeldag at 3,814
m.

First I thought, well maybe we have renamed Gapydzhik into Gazangeldag and
also discovered that it is not 3904 meters high but is actually 3814 meters.
They also found out recently with the satellite technology that actually
Mount Everest is 8 meters lower than thought earlier. But mistake of 90
meters? Then I though that maybe since it is in the border of Azerbaijan
(Nakhichevan AR) and Armenia (Zangezur), it is “commonly” shared peak. But
so is “Bazarduzu”, the highest peak in Azerbaijan (4466 meters). “Bazarduzu”
is also in the border but this time between Azerbaijan and Russian
Federation (Dagestan AR). Thus, it seemed to me that in 1996, five years
after independence and centuries of living in its foothills we suddenly
discovered that actually Gapydzhik was in the Armenian “side” of the border
and therefore we should not show it even in the maps, because this mount
leans towards the land granted to Armenia.

Angry and with these ideas in my mind, I searched the materials from the
former Soviet Union. Almost each map of the Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist
Republic had “Kapudjuk” in the maps referring to Az.SSR. Even the road maps
of Azerbaijan SSR from 1966, printed in Moscow, had that peak in Azerbaijan
SSR. It could not be peak of “internal borders”, because this road map was
only about Azerbaijani SSR. There was separate one about each republic for
its roads, which then would have the highest and lowest places in that
Soviet republic. I looked for it in Azerbaijan Soviet Encyclopedia (ASE) and
it was there too. Why, I asked to myself, suddenly, in 1996, in independent
Azerbaijan we did not want to mention this honor of us in our literature and
maps? Even the “set of maps of the Republic of Armenia”, collected and put
online by the US Embassy in Armenia and especially by its former team member
Diplomat Brady Kiesling (famous for his public resignation from US
Diplomatic services in summer of 2003 as a protest of the US operations in
Iraq) shows Mount Gapydzhik clearly in the border between Azerbaijani SSR
(Nakhichevan) and Armenian SSR
(Zangezur( )

Mount Gapydzhik was not only mentioned in issues related to Azerbaijan when
it came to maps and cartography. In the foothills of this summit, in
Nasirvaz village of Ordubad Region, Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic there
lays the famous Gemiqaya (“Rock of vessel” in Turkish) carvings
(petroglyphs) with paintings of ancient goats and ensemble dances exactly
similar to those in Gobustan near Baku
(), Kalbadjar region in
Azerbaijan and many other on the globe. Some of these paintings by ancient
men date back to 5000 years BC. Nasir Rzayev, famous paleontologist and
archaeologist have studied these carvings and has written several
monographic books on them. Later Prof. Vali Aliyev joined these studies
() and described them to be
of 4th-2nd millennium BC. One would think that Azerbaijanis should preserve
them as they preserve Gobustan. We lost, even temporarily, those painting in
Kalbadjar during Karabakh war of 1992-1994, but in which fight did we lose
“Gemigaya”?

Moreover, both “Gapydzhik” and “Gemigaya” mounts have placed themselves deep
in the mythologies of Azerbaijanis. One ancient myth of the region says that
Noah with his ark was looking for a place to land after the deluge.
According to the myth, first his ark hit the rock and Noah said, “Maybe it
is a mountain” and thus gave the name for Mount “Belke” (“Maybe” in
Azerbaijani) that stands uptown Ordubad. Then his ark hit another mountain,
and Noah said, “Be sure it is mountain (“Inan” ki dagdir”” in Azerbaijani)
and thus gave the name to Inan Dag that also is in Nackichevan (changed into
Ilan Dag i.e. “Snake” mountain in later centuries,). The myth finally “ends”
by heating the big piece of rock that caused Him to say “Finally it is a
mountain” (in Azerbaijani “Akhir” ki, dagdir””). Today the Turkish name of
Mount Ararat is “Agri” meaning “pain” that is also believed to be “changed”
throughout the centuries from “Akhir” (Kamil Veliyev, “Elin Yaddashi, Dilin
Yaddashi” (“Nation’s memory, Tongue’s memory”), Baku, Azerbaijan, 1988))

Another version of this myth said that actually Noah’s ark landed not in
Mount “Akhir” (Agri/Ararat), but on Mount Gapydzhik which means “Little
Door” probably to the new world and that is why its foothills are called
Gemiqaya (i.e. rock of vessel – ark). People living by this summit even
today insist on this version of “deluge” myth considering the ship-like form
of this mount – Gemigaya.

Famous philologist and researcher of Kitabi-Dede-Gorgut, Safarali Babayev
says that some topographic references in that most ancient and biggest epic
book of Azerbaijani Turks, refer also to the foothills of this giant. He
insists that lake “Goycha” (“Blue lake” in Turkish) that is mentioned in
Kitabi-Dede-Gorgut is not the former name of Lake Sevan in modern Armenia
(Lake Goy-cha) as some other Azerbaijani researchers of the book insist, but
this one-hectare lake in the foothills of Mount Gapydzhik, which is called
“Goy-gel”. He argues that 1 day trip from one settlement to “Goycha” as
described in Kitabi-Dede-Gorgut is not feasible if you think it is Lake
Goy-cha (i.e. modern lake Sevan) because then this trip with the travel
methods of those days would be 7 days instead of one. He thinks that
“Goycha” in Kitabi-Dede-Gorgut, is actually Lake “Goy-gel” in the foothills
of this Mountain. As another argument he brings the name of Mount
GAzan-gel-dAg (mentioned above), that has “Gazan” and “gel” (lake) in its
root (“Gazan” was one of the most famous heroes in this epic that some say
is 14 centuries old and “gol” i.e. lake next to it would mean “Mount of
Gazan’s lake”).

With all these in my mind, I had a chance to ask the question to the
professionals of this job – who draw maps for us. While doing research on a
different topic during my employment with UN, I visited then newly
re-organized by former President Heydar Aliyev the Department of Land and
Cartography in the summer of 2002. There, after completing my official
business, I asked to the senior person at this department why now we do not
have Gapydzhik in our maps anymore. He first did not even understand what I
am talking about. Later when I explained to him, he replied quietly that he
did not know why we suddenly do not show it in the geographic and other maps
of Azerbaijan anymore. For me it was very sad to see such a poor situation
of Cartography department.

Ironically, the only map outside of Azerbaijani “official information” that
still shows the correct location of the Mount Gapydzhik is the one used by
the UN and its office in Azerbaijan – at UNDP’s annual Human Development
Reports (links provided below). Thanks to its professional and highly
intellectual staff (both international and national) we have now at least
one credible information to show the location of Mount Gapydzhik in world
geography and still be proud of it. Both UN and UNDP annual Human
Development Reports on Azerbaijan have been under harsh criticism of
Azerbaijani Government. At each meeting of our Government with any UN
official, the latter always is criticized by the former first for UN’s
non-forcing the application of four UN SC resolutions to liberate Nagorno
Karabakh and surrounding Azerbaijani territories and secondly for its
liberal criticism of Azerbaijani Government in the above-mentioned Reports
for several years now. However, in the term of territorial integrity of
Azerbaijan Republic, UN seems to be doing enough to be thanked for:

http://www.usa.am/maps/syuniks.jpg
http://vm.kemsu.ru/en/mezolith/kobistan.html
http://godot.unisa.edu.au/wac/paper.php?paper=999
http://www.un-az.org/undp/HDR2000_en.pdf

A Scientific Conference Dedicated to Grigor Narekatsi Held in Moscow

A SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE DEDICATED TO GRIGOR NAREKATSI HELD IN MOSCOW

Azg/am
29 July 2004

A scientific conference under the title “Grigor Narekatsi and medieval
spiritual culture of Armenian” was held at the Institute of Literature
after Gorky in Moscow on July 23-24. Nine scientists from the Armenian
Academy of Sciences and seven scientists from Russia participated. In
his interview to Azg Daily Avik Isahakian, Dr. of philology, noted
that for the first time in the history they attempted to view Grigor
Narekatsi in the context of medieval spiritual culture. The report of
Alexander Kudelin, member of the Russian Academy of Sciences,
vice-president of the institute, was singled out for the profound
knowledge of the epoch and the material itself. In her report called
“Narekatsi and the great Ukrainian enlightener Grigoris Skovoroda”
Prof. Nina Nadiarnikh tried to give a comparative analysis of the
thinkers, find the common humanitarian, progressive and other features
in the works of the two.

Olga Sazonova’s report “The thought in the Eastern Europe in the early
middle ages. Narekatsi and Hilarion” depicted Narekatsi as someone
having the first ideas of world and faith in his works.

Father Danila, Russian Orthodox priest, approached Narekatsi’s
poemfrom a modern perspective. The author of the last translation of
Narekatsiâ=80=99s poem Vladimir Mikushevich presented all difficulties
connected with the translation and shared with his encouragements of
the work.

>From Armenia there were scientists Zaven Avetisian, Knarik Davtian,
Elena Aleksanian, Levon Chukaszian, Magda Djanpoladian, Azat
Eghiazarian. The latter presented an interesting observation into the
similarities of the Armenian epos “David of Sasoun” and Narekatsi’s
poem.

All the reports proceeded from comparative literature. Avik Isahakian
in his report called “Character of the poet in Isahakian’s â=80=98Abu
Lala Mahari’ and Narekatsi’s â=80=98Mournful Songs'” presented
philosophical peculiarities and similarities that the two poets
share. The Arabian poet and Narekatsi had almost the same denying
attitude towards the world, men, love, power and other.

By the end of the conference the presidents of the two institutes
signed an agreement of mutual cooperation in the field of publishing,
postgraduate students’ exchange and in other spheres.

The Armenian community was actively involved in the conference. The
Gorky institute’s interest in Grigor Narekatsi was obvious.

By Melania Badalian

Draft of Const. Reforms Essentially Different From Current Const.

DRAFT OF CONSTITUTIONAL REFORMS ESSENTIALLY DIFFERENT FROM CURRENT
CONSTITUTION

YEREVAN, JULY 28. ARMINFO. The draft of constitutional reforms is
different from the current Constitution in over 50 provisions, Armen
Rustamyan, representative of the Executive Council, Armenian
Revolutionary Federation “Dashnaktsutyun” (ARF), told ARMINFO.

The draft envisages the prolongation of the Legislature’s powers to
five years, whereas under the current Constitution this term is four
years. Rustamyan pointed out that the prolongation of the
Legislature’s powers does not mean the prolongation of the President’s
powers. “According to the current Constitution, the President’s powers
expire five years after he is elected, and this clause remains
unchanged in the draft,” he said. Rustamyan reported that at its
recent sitting attended by the President, the Council of the coalition
reached an agreement on reducing the number of Armenian
parliamentarians from 131 to 121. He said that this figure will be
included in the draft amendments to the Constitution. However,
Rustamyan stressed that the ARF’s position on this issue was
essentially different from that of the other coalition-forming
political forces. For example, the ARF insisted on the number of
parliamentarians being reduced to 101. Despite the protest raised by
the “Law-Governed Country” party, the Council included in the draft a
provision stipulating the recall of the Parliament Speaker and
Vice-Speakers. According to the document, they can be recalled by the
majority of votes. Rustamyan stressed that the Law on the Regulations
of the RA National Assembly will specify this process, after necessary
amendments are made to the document. He stated that the draft
stipulates the enlargement of the Legislature’s powers due to the
reduction of the President’s powers. Specifically, the National
Assembly is entitled to be actively involved in forming the
Government. Rustamyan pointed out that the draft leaves almost
unchanged the provision on the formation of the Council of Justice,
that is, the President has the right to appoint three lawyers as
Council members. However, an agreement was reached on the enlargement
the three judicial instances’ powers in selecting members of the
Council of Justice. Rustamyan emphasized the necessity of including a
representative of the Economic Court in the Council of Justice.

Another important difference of constitutional reforms is that the
draft removes the ban from dual citizenship. Rustamyan stressed that
the rights and duties of the persons having dual citizenship have not
yet been specified. He stated that the ARF objects to the draft
regulating the rights and duties of persons with dual
citizenship. According to him, it is a most complicated issue and must
be regulated by a special law.

Rustamyan reported that the draft of constitutional amendments has
been sent to the CE Venetian Commission for expert examination. This
September, the PACE Monitoring Commission is to consider the
document. And PACE is to consider it at its session in October. He
reports that a referendum on constitutional reforms is scheduled for
July 5, 2005, which is no coincidence, as the current Constitution was
adopted on July 5, 1995.

ANKARA: US Ties up New Base Structuring in Europe

Zaman, Turkey
July 27 2004

US Ties up New Base Structuring in Europe

The US will begin negotiations concerning new “strategic
partnerships” that will assist the redeployment of its military
bases.

General Charles Wald, Deputy Commander for the European Command, told
a foreign policy symposium in the Senate that the US needed to change
its military settlement plan in foreign lands. Wald said that the
Ukraine, Russia, Romania, Bulgaria, the Black Sea region of Turkey,
Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia, in the Southern Caucuses, because of
their proximity to oil fields, drug smuggling, terrorism and
instability, were the “‘new geopolitical hot points”.

General Wald noted that the US was not looking for a permanent base
in Southern Caucasian countries, rather, “strategic partnerships.”
American troops settled in Germany could be temporarily shifted to
some countries including Turkey. Last month, an article in The New
York Times claimed that the US planned to move 72 F-16 planes from
Germany to Incirlik Base in Eastern Turkey. The story was denied. 84
percent of 120,000 American troops in Europe are in Germany.

Armenians weigh Kerry vow

Los Angeles Daily News, CA
July 26 2004

Armenians weigh Kerry vow

Candidatesays he’ll recognize genocide

By Lisa Friedman
Staff Writer

WASHINGTON — Presidential candidate John Kerry has promised to
formally recognize the Armenian genocide if he is elected.

But presidents George W. Bush, Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush all
made similar vows as candidates — then once inside the White House
opposed resolutions acknowledging genocide.

Still, in interviews with Armenian-Americans across Southern
California and elsewhere this week, hopes for the Massachusetts
Democrat ran high.

“I think we might expect something different from candidate Kerry,”
said Peter Balakian, author of “The Burning Tigris: The Armenian
Genocide and America’s Response.”

“He spent his whole life immersed in the Armenian community,”
Balakian said, noting that Massachusetts is home to about 30,000
Armenian Americans. “This is a candidate with a great depth of
knowledge on this history.”

Armenians contend the Ottoman Empire began a centrally planned
slaughter in 1915 under cover of World War I in which about 1.5
million Armenians were killed. Turkey insists that number is
inflated, and that Armenians died along with thousands of Turks as
the result of crushing a mass uprising against the Ottoman Empire.

Reluctant to alienate Turkey, a valued U.S. ally, American presidents
have traditionally taken a middle road describing the casualties as
“massacres” but stopping short of using the term “genocide” and
opposing resolutions acknowledging a genocide.

The opposition cuts across party lines. Currently the Bush
administration and House Republican leaders are demanding an
amendment by Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Pasadena, recognizing the genocide,
be stripped from a foreign aid bill.

But in 2000 it was President Clinton who blocked a genocide
resolution by then-Rep. James Rogan, R-Glendale, from coming to the
House floor.

“It seems to be a nonpartisan issue. It’s more about the State
Department and the White House not having the courage to exercise its
moral leadership,” Balakian said.

Scholars and activists said they are pinning new hopes on Kerry
largely because he voted in favor of Sen. Bob Dole’s genocide
resolution in 1990 and currently is co-sponsoring a Senate version of
a resolution acknowledging the genocide.

“He has a long record of supporting issues of concern to the
Armenian-American community, and he comes from a state where
Armenian-Americans have been since the early 20th century, so there’s
some history there,” said Armen Carapetian, a spokesman for the
Armenian National Committee of America’s Western Region in Glendale.

Added Seto Boyadian, who heads the Armenian National Committee of
America’s San Gabriel chapter, “As long as he has been in public
life, he has always supported the genocide resolution. He’s
committed. He’s on the record.”

Others, of course, are skeptical that Kerry, whom critics have long
accused of flip-flopping on issues, will stand firm.

“The Democrats need the Armenian votes to regain their political
power. If elected, Kerry and his ilk will forget about the Armenians
and their genocide the next day,” Saakyan Gayane of Glendale wrote in
an e-mail.

Even those pinning their hopes on Kerry said they would not be
surprised if he changed his tune once elected.

“We know what pressures he will face on this issue. Those are real
pressures. The State Department won’t change its tune,” Carapetian
said.

Added Garbis Hindoyan, who heads the Armenian National Committee of
America’s East Valley chapter in Van Nuys, “We hope if he’s elected,
Kerry will keep his word.

“On the other hand,” he said, “we will not be shocked if he does what
Bill Clinton and George Bush did.”