Istanbul — the mosques Sinan didn’t build

Sunday’s Zaman , Turkey
Sept 13 2009

Ä°stanbul — the mosques Sinan didn’t build

So great is the hold on the imagination of the great Ottoman architect
Sinan that it’s sometimes easy to run away with the idea that most of
Ä°stanbul’s great mosques were his handiwork.

But however prolific an architect he was, Sinan was responsible for
only 24 of the mosques, and even some of those that most dominate the
skyline were actually designed by other hands.
When the Ottomans rode into Constantinople on May 29, 1453 they were a
Muslim army occupying what had been a Christian city, so one of the
most pressing tasks facing them was to establish a network of places
to pray. The easiest way to do this was to adapt the existing churches
into mosques; a mere three days after the conquest, Sultan Mehmet II
was able to attend Friday prayers in what had been the church of Hagia
Sophia but had been hastily converted into a mosque. Other churches
were soon adapted to serve the needs of their new congregations with
the addition of mihrabs and minarets, but within just a few years, the
first purpose-designed mosques, often following designs developed in
Bursa, the original Ottoman capital, were starting to spring up.

These early Ä°stanbul mosques are often overlooked because they
lack the size and splendor of their newer counterparts. However, some
are fine buildings in their own right that deserve more attention than
they receive. Take the Murat PaÅ?a Camii at YusufpaÅ?a,
for example. Built in 1473, just 20 years after the conquest, it’s
squeezed into a piece of land between the tramway and the metro, which
means that most passers-by are in too much of a hurry even to glance
at its attractive brick-and-stone-striped facade. Or the
Ä°Å?hakpaÅ?a Camii on Aybıyık Caddesi
right in the heart of tourist Ä°stanbul. Built in 1482, it’s
stuck on a busy corner behind a high wall, missed by most people in
their rush to reach Topkapı Sarayı despite its
impressive age.

Mahmut PaÅ?a Camii

Tucked away out of sight near the Grand Bazaar is the Mahmut
PaÅ?a Camii that dates back to 1462. It’s well worth visiting
not just because it was built less than 10 years after the conquest
but because the tiled tomb of the great Grand Vizier Mahmut
PaÅ?a behind it is a one-off in Ä°stanbul that looks as if
it has somehow strayed here from Central Asia. More conspicuous is the
Firuz AÄ?a Camii on busy Divan Yolu close to the Sultanahmet
tram stop, which was built in 1491. With its triple-arched portico and
single dome and minaret, it’s an exquisite example of the Bursa
architectural style prevailing before grand courtyards and multiple
minarets became fashionable.

But the first of the really important mosques was, of course, the
Fatih Camii, named after Sultan Mehmet II, who instructed that work
should begin on replacing the huge Church of the Holy Apostles that
had stood on the site almost as soon as he had found his way around
his new capital. The mosque was the work of a much less well known
Sinan, Atik Sinan, about whose life we know almost nothing. As the
almost certainly apocryphal story goes, he was rewarded for his
efforts by having his hands chopped off in 1471 when the sultan
realized that the dome of Hagia Sophia still outstripped that of his
new mosque. He was buried in the grounds of the Kumrulu Mosque in
Karagümrük.

The Fatih Camii is an enormous complex, currently undergoing
restoration, and is virtually enclosed by medreses (theological
schools) and other outbuildings that testify to its role as the local
social center. It was badly damaged by an earthquake in 1766 and had
to be extensively rebuilt, which leaves the Beyazıt Camii
beside the Grand Bazaar as the oldest of the early imperial mosques
that is still virtually unchanged. This mosque was built between 1501
and 1506 by Yakub-Å?ah ibn Sultan-Å?ah, a little known but
probably Turkish architect who appears to have taken Hagia Sophia (Aya
Sofya) as his model. Like the Fatih Camii, it was built on a huge
scale, and like the Fatih Camii it was given a marvelous porticoed
courtyard, a feature that Mimar Sinan went on to perfect in the
Å?ehzadebaÅ?ı Camii and others of his masterpieces.

During the latter part of the 16th century, architecture in
Ä°stanbul was utterly dominated by Koca Mimar Sinan. There are,
however, one or two large mosques of that date that were not his
handiwork; for example, the lovely NiÅ?ancı Mehmet
PaÅ?a Mosque in Karagümrük looks like a Sinan
building but appears instead to be the work of an unknown
architect. There are also several surviving mosques that were the
handiwork of Davut AÄ?a, who was a pupil of Sinan’s. It was
Davut AÄ?a, for example, who began work on the Yeni Camii at
Eminönü in 1597, although work soon stopped again, and
the mosque was not completed until 1663, by which time the architect
in charge of things was Mustafa AÄ?a. Davut AÄ?a was also
responsible for the lovely Cerrah PaÅ?a Camii, which he
completed in 1593.

Mehmet AÄ?a’s masterpiece

Of course the most famous mosque in all Ä°stanbul has to be the
Sultanahmet Camii, better known to most visitors as the Blue
Mosque. With its extraordinary six minarets and its wonderful cascade
of silvery domes and semi-domes, this is a building which completely
dominates the city skyline. It was the masterpiece of one Mehmet
AÄ?a (c.1540-1617), another student of Sinan’s, who designed it
for the youthful Sultan Ahmet I between 1609 and 1616, reputedly
bringing about the collapse of the Ä°znik tile business in the
process since the tile makers, obliged to work for the sultan for
minimal wages, soon made their escape to Kütahya.

Skipping forward a century, we come to the period when the West
started to assert its influence on Ä°stanbul and the mosques
started to take on baroque flourishes, especially under the
stewardship of Mehmet Tahir AÄ?a, whose work is on display in
the Ayazma Camii in Ã`sküdar, in the Beylerbeyi Camii, and
in the newly and beautifully restored Laleli Camii. The Laleli Camii
still retains features of the older models in its stripy brickwork and
sizeable courtyard, but within another 100 years the mosques had shed
the bricks and courtyards, and acquired a new look in which lofty
arched windows were the most conspicuous feature. Several of these
grand 19th-century mosques were designed by the Balyans, a family of
Turkish-Armenian architects who were also responsible for the
Dolmabahçe Sarayı: Krikor Balyan designed the Nusretiye
Camii at Tophane between 1822 and 1826, while his grandsons Hagop and
Sarkis Balyan are thought to have been behind the Valide
Sultan Camii, built in 1871 and currently undergoing restoration in
Aksaray. Another grandson, Nikogos, drew up the designs for the
Dolmabahçe Camii in 1853.

Unfortunately since the 19th century, mosque architecture has gone
into a sharp decline. The twin stars of the First National
Architecture movement, Vedat Tek and Kemalettin Bey, tried their hands
at mosque design, Tek behind the post office in Sirkeci and Kemalettin
on the waterfront in Bebek, but neither of these buildings is
especially original or distinctive. For that accolade one would have
to head straight to the edge of the Karacaahmet Cemetery behind the
HaydarpaÅ?a train station to visit the newly opened
Å?akirin Camii, whose interior was designed by Zeynep
FadıllıoÄ?lu, a woman better known for her work on
high-society restaurants. With its sweeping Guggenheim-style dome, its
arched mihrab of turquoise and gold and a chandelier of dripping
plastic, it was always going to have the traditionalists raising
eyebrows. But when most new mosque designs simply parody Sinan motifs
in cheap concrete, it’s surely a joy to be able to point to at least
one 21st-century mosque that stands out as a true original.

13 September 2009, Sunday
PAT YALE Ä°STANBUL

Troops ‘Killed In Caucasus Clash’

TROOPS ‘KILLED IN CAUCASUS CLASH’
By Tom Esslemont

BBC News
South Caucasus

Five Armenian soldiers have been shot dead in a ceasefire violation
near the disputed region of Nagorno Karabakh, according to Azeri
media reports.

Azerbaijan and Armenia went to war over the territory in the 1990s
and a lasting resolution has not been found.

Azerbaijan has declined to confirm the shooting.

But three Azeri news agencies said the fighting took place in Aghdam
district, near the front line which has remained in place since the
war ended in 1994.

A spokesman for the Azeri defence ministry declined to comment,
though one unnamed official confirmed to the BBC that there had been
some shooting and that there were casualties.

The Karabakh Defence Ministry spokesman, Senor Hasratian, told the
BBC that there had been gunfire overnight, but said that the reports
in the Azeri media were false.

Aghdam is one of seven Azeri areas surrounding Nagorno Karabakh still
held by Armenian forces. Azeri troops man trenches as little as 50
metres away.

Shootings occasionally interrupt the fragile ceasefire which has been
in place ever since the conflict ended.

In January Azerbaijan, a major exporter of gas and oil, said three
Armenian soldiers died in a similar incident.

An estimated 30,000 people were killed during the war and mediated
negotiations to try to find a lasting resolution are ongoing.

Session Of PACE Monitoring Commission To Take Place In Paris Septemb

SESSION OF PACE MONITORING COMMISSION TO TAKE PLACE IN PARIS SEPTEMBER 9

ARMENPRESS
SEPTEMBER 8, 2009
YEREVAN

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 8, ARMENPRESS: Session of the Monitoring Committee
of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe will take
place in Paris September 9 the agenda of which includes an issue
on Armenia. According to the draft agenda, Armenian delegation must
present information on the implementation of 1677 Resolution on the
"Activity of Democratic Institutions in Armenia".

Head of the Armenian NA’s delegation to PACE, chairman of the
state-legal affairs commission David Harutyunyan and member of the
delegation, head of the foreign relations commission of the NA Armen
Rustamyan will participate in the session.

Charles Aznavour: I’ll Be Very Happy If Border Opens

CHARLES AZNAVOUR: I’LL BE VERY HAPPY IF BORDER OPENS

PanARMENIAN.Net
07.09.2009 18:45 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenia and Turkey can develop friendly ties if there
is agreement by both sides, Armenian Ambassador to Switzerland Charles
Aznavour said. "I’ll be very happy if border opens, however, we should
bear in mind that such problems are not easy to solve. Both countries
have people who are against that. Opening border with Turkey will
be a positive step for Armenia as it will enable the country to move
forward. Currently Armenia has open border with Iran and partially,
with Georgia. But that is not enough for country’s development,"
Svoboda quotes Aznavour as saying.

RA President Leaves For Croatia

RA PRESIDENT LEAVES FOR CROATIA

Information-Analytic Agency NEWS.am
Sept 7 2009
Armenia

RA President Serzh Sargsyan leaves for a 2-day visit to Croatia on the
invitation of Stjepan Mesic, President of Republic of Croatia. The two
presidents will have a tête-a-tête meeting in Bella Villa on Veliki
Brioni Island, RA MFA press centre told NEWS.am. Then, talks will be
enlarged under participation of Armenia and Croatia delegations. The
presidential joint press conference will be held too.

Later in the day, the Presidents will head from Pula to Zagreb to
attend Armenia-Croatia business forum. In Zagreb, Sargsyan will meet
with Speaker of the Croatian Parliament Luka BebiÄ~G and Croatian PM
Jadranka Kosor.

President of Croatia was on official visit to Armenia on May 21-23,
2009.

Foreign ministers of Armenia and Georgia to discuss ties

Aysor, Armenia
Sept 5 2009

Foreign ministers of Armenia and Georgia to discuss ties

Yesterday the foreign minister of Armenia Edward Nalbandian had a
meeting with the foreign minister of Georgia Grigol Vashadze, the
press-office of the Armenian Foreign Ministry said to Aysor.am.

E. Nalbandian marked the importance of the constant ties between the
both countries noting that these contacts create a basis for further
development of mutually beneficial relations.

E. Nalbandian and G. Vashadze detailed the wide range of issues of
bilateral ties. They discussed the works on
Gyumri-Akhaltsikhe-Bavra-Batumi road building which will facilitate
the bilateral trucking and the passenger transfer.

The foreign ministers of two countries also discussed issues of
expanding legal framework, the process of delimitation of borders and
cooperation in the energy sector.

The Armenian minister initiated the discussion on problems of Armenian
residents of Georgia.

The sides also signed a memorandum on the land exchanging for
diplomatic missions.

It’s scheduled the meeting of the President of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan
with the foreign minister of Georgia on September, 5.

Statement By Javier Solana, EU High Representative For The CFSP, On

STATEMENT BY JAVIER SOLANA, EU HIGH REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE CFSP, ON THE NORMALISATION OF RELATIONS BETWEEN TURKEY AND ARMENIA

Targeted News Service
September 2, 2009 Wednesday 3:00 AM EST

The European Union’s European Council’s Secretary General issued the
following news release:

Javier Solana, EU High Representative for the Common Foreign and
Security Policy (CFSP), today made the following statement on the
normalisation of relations between Turkey and Armenia:

"I welcome yesterday’s agreement between Turkey and Armenia to start
internal political consultations on the protocols providing the
framework for establishing diplomatic relations.

This is a crucial step towards normalisation of bilateral relations,
which would greatly contribute to peace, security and stability
throughout an important region of Europe.

I commend the courage and vision of both sides to move forward
with this historic process. I hope the two protocols can be signed,
ratified, and implemented in the near term.

I congratulate Switzerland for its mediation efforts and stands ready
to offer support and assistance to the normalisation process."

The Armenian Boxer Bites The Bulgarian Opponent

THE ARMENIAN BOXER BITES THE BULGARIAN OPPONENT

Aysor
Sept 3 2009
Armenia

Armenia’s Hrachik Javakhyan, the weight category up to 60, bites the
Bulgarian Simeon Bunarzhizh with 11:1 points on the recent World Cup
in Milan.

There will be H.Javakhyan’s next fight on September 4 against Everton
Lopes.

Armenian-born Belarusian Vazgen Safaryants won Cameroon’s Achel Apia
who hasn’t entered the ring.

Samvel Matevosyan, the weight category up to 69, will meet Albania’s
Ethmir Kuchi today.

Representing the Russian team David Hayrapetyan (48) will fight
against Colombia’s Segura Avila, representing the Georgian team
Alexanr Chechelyan will fight against Turkey’s Ferhat Pehlivanov.

Azat Hovhannisyan (57 kg) and Tsolak Ananikyan (91 kg) will enter
the ring today.

Their opponents will be Hector Manzalina (Venezuela) and Sandro
Dirnfeld (Slovakia).

CIA Atrocities Revealed To A National Shrug

CIA ATROCITIES REVEALED TO A NATIONAL SHRUG
Written by Ted Rall

Columbia City Paper
Sept 3 2009

WE HAVE MET THE NAZIS, AND THEY ARE US.

NEW YORK–Nazis. Americans are Nazis. We are Nazis.

Godwin’s Law be damned–it’s impossible to read the newly-released
CIA report on the torture of Muslim prisoners without thinking of
the Third Reich.

Sadism exists in every culture. A century ago, for example, Western
adventurers who visited Tibet reported that the authorities in
Lhasa, that supposed capital of pacifism, publicly gouged out
criminals’ eyes and yanked out their tongues. But Nazi atrocities
were stylistically distinct from, say, the Turkish genocide of the
Armenians or the Rwandan massacres of the early 1990s. German war
crimes were characterized by methodical precision, the application of
"rational" technology to increase efficiency, the veneer of legality
and the perversion of medical science.

Nazi crimes were also marked by public indifference, which amounted
to tacit support. Here and now, only 25 percent of Americans told
the latest Pew Research poll that they believe torture is always wrong.

"The CIA’s secret interrogation program operated under strict rules,
and the rules were dictated from Washington with the painstaking,
eye-glazing detail beloved by any bureaucracy," observed The New York
Times. We have much in common with the Germans.

"In July 2002," the declassified report reveals, a CIA officer
"reportedly used a ‘pressure point’ technique: with both of his hands
on the detainee’s neck, [he] manipulated his fingers to restrict the
detainee’s carotid artery." Another agent "watched his eyes to the
point that the detainee would nod and start to pass out; then…shook
the detainee to wake him. This process was repeated for a total of
three applications on the detainee."

The CIA’s rinse-lather-repeat approach to torture is reminiscent of
Dr. Sigmund Rascher’s experiments at Dachau and a parallel project
conducted by the Japanese Imperial Army’s infamous Unit 731 in occupied
Manchuria in 1942-43. Rascher, who was tried for war crimes after
World War II, froze or lashed detainees nearly to death, then revived
them over and over. German and Japanese doctors developed detailed
protocols governing the severity of exposure to which inmates could
be subjected–protocols seized by U.S. occupation forces and turned
over to the OSS, predecessor of the CIA.

So it was in the CIA’s prisons at Guantánamo, Bagram, Diego Garcia,
eastern Europe, Thailand and elsewhere.

(Or, to be more accurate, so it is. Bush publicly banned torture in
2006, but we know it was still going on as of 2007. Obama supposedly
banned it again earlier this year, but then his CIA director Leon
Panetta told Congress the agency reserves the right to keep doing
it. Until the entire secret prison network is dismantled and every
single prisoner released, it would be absurd to assume that torture is
not continuing.) Among the verbal treasures in the CIA papers is the
"Water Dousing" section of the "Guidelines on Medical and Psychological
Support to Detainee Rendition, Interrogation and Detention," which
"allow for water to be applied using either a hose connected to tap
water, or a bottle or similar container as the water source." Ah, the
glorious war on terror. Detainees may be soaked in water as cold as
41 degrees Fahrenheit for as long as 20 minutes–no longer, no colder.

For the record, the CIA’s medical expertise is about as reliable
as its legal and moral sense. Forty-one degrees is bracingly cold;
41 was the temperature of the Hudson River was when US Airways
Flight 1549 crashed into it earlier this year. (Remember the ice
floes?) "Generally, a person can survive in 41-degree water for 10,
15 or 20 minutes," Dr. Christopher McStay, an emergency room physician
at New York City’s Bellevue Hospital told Scientific American magazine.

Like its Gestapo and SS antecedents, the CIA is highly
bureaucratic. CIA employees were informed that "Advance Headquarters
approval is required to use any physical pressures [against
prisoners]." And those permissions came from the very top of the
chain of command: the White House, which ordered the Office of
Legal Counsel and other legal branches of the federal government
to draft "CYA" memoranda. The memos, wrote Joshua L. Dratel in his
introduction to "The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib," a
compilation of memos authorizing torture of Muslim detainees reflect
"a wholly result-oriented system in which policy makers start with
an objective and work backward."

Also reminiscent of Nazism is the utter absence of firewalls
that has come to characterize the behavior of top government
officials. Totalitarian regimes like Nazi Germany corrupt the judiciary
by using the courts to carry out political policy. Beginning under
Bush and now under Obama, judicial independence has been eradicated.

On August 28th The New York Times reported: "In July, Leon E. Panetta,
the CIA director, tried to head off the investigation [of the CIA’s
torture program], administration officials said. He sent the CIA’s top
lawyer, Stephen W. Preston, to [the Department of] Justice to persuade
aides to Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. to abandon any plans for
an inquiry." There’s a term for this: Obstruction of Justice. You’re
not supposed to try to influence the outcome of an investigation. It
was count six of the impeachment proceedings against President Nixon.

To Holder’s credit, he has appointed a special prosecutor. To his
discredit, the focus of the investigation is narrow: he will only go
after officials who went beyond the Bush Administration’s over-the-top
torture directives (which allow, as seen above, freezing people to
death). He does not plan to go after the worst criminals, who are the
Bush Administration lawyers and officials, including Bush and Cheney
themselves, who ordered the war crimes–much less those like Obama
who are currently covering them up.

He should change his mind. While he’s at it, he should throw Leon
Panetta in jail.

Holder’s brief currently involves just 20 cases, which include
detainees who were murdered by the CIA. But even those will be tough
to prosecute, reports The New York Times: "Evidence, witnesses and
even the bodies of the victims of alleged abuses have not been found
in all cases."

Because, you see, the bodies were burned and dumped.

They–the CIA–are Nazis for committing the crimes.

And we are Nazis for not giving a damn. Only a third of Americans told
the April 27th CBS News/New York Times poll that there ought to be
an investigation of Bush-era war crimes–and they don’t care enough
to march in the streets, much less break a few windows. So few of
my columns on torture have been reprinted by American newspapers or
websites that I seriously contemplated not bothering to write this one.

We have met the Nazis, and they are us.

(Ted Rall, President of the Association of American Editorial
Cartoonists, is author of the books "To Afghanistan and Back" and
"Silk Road to Ruin.")

Congratulatory Messages On Independence Day

CONGRATULATORY MESSAGES ON INDEPENDENCE DAY

kh
11:58 am | September 02, 2009

Official

Armenia’s President Serzh Sargsyan issued a congratulatory message on
the 18th anniversary of Nagorno-Karabakh’s Independence. The message
says in part,

Dear compatriots,

Let me congratulate you on Independence Day of the Nagorno-Karabakh
Republic.

The last 18 years reaffirmed the unambiguousness of the historic
decision of 1991. Today the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic is an established
state with its structures, army and people mastering their fortunes
on their own.

Thanks to Artsakh, today we have a modern republic meeting the
ideals of freedom, sovereignty and democracy, a republic which,
regardless of all objective and artificial obstacle and ordeals,
continues thriving and booming the country’s economy and culture. The
Republic of Armenia and the Armenian people have always supported
and will keep supporting Artsakh.

I assure all Armenians and Artsakhi people that any solution to the
Karabakh conflict peaceful resolution will be based on the consent
of Karabakhi people.

Dear Artsakhi people,

For this day we owe to the fallen heroes who sacrificed their lives
for the liberation of their homeland.

Bowing to their tombs I congratulate you on this glorious day and
wish you prosperity and happiness.

Speaker of the Armenian Parliament Hovik Abrahamyan also issued a
congratulatory message on Karabakh’s Independence Day.

"Dear Compatriots,

I warmly congratulate you on the occasion of the 18th Anniversary of
Independence of NKR, one of the most significant holidays symbolizing
the achievements of Armenians.

We bow our heads for the memory of those who dedicated their lives to
the independence of Artsakh, we are to be more obliged and realize the
main pledge for a peaceful life of our people, creation and success
is in the continuous unity.

I wish happiness, strength and vigor to all the Armenians and the
Armenians in Artsakh, having earned the right of their independence,
and to all of us I wish a united will and purposefulness in realizing
the defense and strengthening of Artsakh, raising the welfare for
Armenians and for realizing Armenian national goals," runs the message.

http://a1plus.am/en/official/2009/09/2/karaba