The soprano superwoman

Detroit Free Press (Michigan)
October 6, 2005, Thursday

The soprano superwoman

By Mark Stryker

For an opera regarded as one of the peaks of the repertoire,
Vencenzo Bellini’s “Norma,” which opens Michigan Opera Theatre’s
season this weekend, doesn’t often make it to the stage. The reason
is simple: Norma — the Druid priestess who breaks her vow of
chastity in an affair with the Roman pro-consul, the mortal enemy of
her people — is possibly the most difficult role to cast in opera.

The vocal demands are immense, requiring a soprano who marries
Herculean strength and stamina with the usually contradictory agility
and control. Those qualities are all needed to sing Bellini’s florid
coloratura lines, unusually expansive lyric melodies and floating
high notes . Dramatically, the singer must express the mercurial
depths of a woman who is part warrior, part politician, part lover,
part mother, part feminist and part Medea.

“If you can sing this role, you are truly blessed,” says Armenian
soprano Hasmik Papian, who will alternate with American Brenda Harris
as Norma in MOT’s production.

A failure at its 1831 premiere, “Norma” rallied quickly, earning a
reputation as the greatest dramatic masterpiece of the age of bel
canto — literally “beautiful singing” — defined by the
hyper-lyrical and fluidly melodic works of Bellini, Gaetano Donizetti
and Gioacchino Rossini. In Bellini, even more than his
contemporaries, melody becomes the key means to express drama and
character.

Like Hamlet, Lear or Stanley Kowalski, Norma has always been
associated with specific stars dating back to Guiditta Pasta, who
sang the premiere. Legends like Rosa Ponselle and Rosa Raisa were
associated with the role in the 1920s and ’30s. Maria Callas reigned
supreme in the 1950s and early ’60s, and for many her intensity still
defines the role. Joan Sutherland took another path, relying on
blissful vocal splendor in her 1960s and ’70s performances.

In 1989, Sutherland sang the last Normas of her career for MOT in a
production that general director David DiChiera commissioned
expressly for her. The same production, designed by John Pascoe, is
being redeployed this time around.

After Sutherland and the slightly younger Montserrat Caballe, others
have stepped into the role, some successfully, some disastrously. But
in recent decades it seems like God stopped making Normas.

“Actually, it’s not that God hasn’t made Normas,” says DiChiera.
“It’s that God hasn’t made superstars who are Normas. In America it’s
not an opera that’s reached the broad public like those by Puccini
and Verdi. ‘Norma’s’ success from the box office perspective has
depended on superstars. People weren’t necessarily going to see
‘Norma’ in the past. They were going to see Maria Callas or Joan
Sutherland.”

For years, DiChiera has wanted to revive the opera, but every time he
traveled to Chicago, Toronto, Los Angeles or elsewhere to hear a
soprano hyped as the next great Norma, he’d return home dejected.
Then he discovered Papian, who has made the role a specialty, earning
rapturous reviews in Washington, Montreal, Vienna and elsewhere —
and the endorsement of some aficionados as the Norma the opera world
has been waiting for.

Papian first sang the role for Polish National Opera in Warsaw in
1992. She was drafted as a last-minute substitute, five days before
opening night. Though she had previously studied the role, she did
not have it nearly up to performance standards when she impulsively
agreed to the offer.

“I said yes and then I realized, ‘My God, what have I done?’ ” she
recalls.

The director of the production, fortuitously, was mezzo-soprano
Fedora Barbieri, who had sung the supporting role of Adalgisa to
Callas’ Norma and was able to pass along a number of insider tips,
among them that she should sing the famous aria “Casta Diva” — a
prayer to the moon for peace between Gaul and Rome — with no
extraneous body movement. “It’s a prayer. Everything is in the
voice,” Papian says.

As difficult as Norma is, Papian says that singers cannot let the
challenge intimidate them. A steely confidence is required. The role
demands respect, but not fear.

Still, it can be daunting knowing that every time you step on stage
as Norma, the cognoscenti will be comparing your every move to
Callas, Sutherland the rest of the pantheon. All of which feeds into
mythology of the role.

Harris, who is singing just her third production of “Norma” for MOT
but has generated promising buzz, recalls a recent MOT rehearsal when
stage director Mario Corradi referred to a couple of Callas
recordings of “Norma” made a decade apart that differ greatly in
terms of detail. His point was that even the greatest artists keep
searching for new depths .

“I said, ‘Look, if you’re going to start throwing the C-word around
here, I’m going to leave the room,’ ” says Harris with a laugh.

Harris tries not to think about the inevitable Callas comparisons,
but she is aware of the lineage and responsibility.

“I think about it with regards to how awesome this music is and am I
doing it the best justice I can — whether that’s in the greatness
range or just my own greatness range,” she says. “I’m someone else
with my own strengths and approach. But if I thought about it too
much, I couldn’t do it.”

Armenia’s defense concept to be approved in 2007

ARKA News Agency
Oct 7 2005

ARMENIA’S DEFENSE CONCEPT TO BE APPROVED IN 2007

YEREVAN, October 7. /ARKA/. Armenia’s defense concept is to be
approved in 2007, RA Minister of Defense Serge Sargsyan stated at the
Rose-Roth seminar, NATO Parliamentary Assembly. According to him, the
concept will be in harmony with the strategy of national security and
will be made public. “It will also be submitted to the RA National
Assembly, which will ensure the basis for short- and long-term
defense-military planning,” the Minister said. Sargsyan said that the
defense concept illustrates the role and mission of the armed troops
and will serve as a fundamental document for efforts towards reforms.
“It will ensure a single strategic direction for armed forces and
other government officials responsible for national defense,”
Sargsyan said. He added that the dissemination of defense doctrine
will give an impetus to public discussions of defense problems and
ensure assistance in satisfying military needs stipulated by the
document. “The defense strategy will also have a paramount importance
for reforms and modernization or the RA armed forces,” Sargsyan said.
P.T. -0–

Will Karabakh Get an Intermediate Status?

AZG Armenian Daily #181, 08/10/2005

Karabakh issue

WILL KARABAKH GET AN INTERMEDIATE STATUS?

Regnum agency quoted Sabine Freizer, the International Crisis Group director
for South Caucasus, as saying that the ICG will soon represent its second
report to Armenia, Azerbaijan and Nagorno Karabakh that puts forward 20
options for the conflict regulations. Freizer said, in particular, that the
ICG offers holding referendum among the Armenians of Karabakh and the Azeris
who are bound to return to their former homes to decide the status of the
region. “While talking about a referendum we need to be sure that Baku will
recognize its results”, she said. Freizer thinks that it is the
international community that has to set the date of the referendum and not
Armenia and Azerbaijan. The international community will assess “as to what
extent Nagorno Karabakh is a sovereign state and to what extent the
authorities of Karabakh are ready to protect national minorities”.

Freizer underscored that a solution to the conflict can be found if the
sides leave aside the status issue for now and get down to other issues.
Freizer looks optimistically at the fact that the sides understood that
“package regulation is impossible and some territories need to be returned
inviting international peacekeepers to locate there”. “That way the people
of Karabakh will get an intermediate status of independence”, she said.

COE: Pres of the Congress of Local and Regional Auths visits ROA

PRESS RELEASE
Council of Europe Press Division
Ref: 509a05
Tel: +33 (0)3 88 41 25 60
Fax:+33 (0)3 88 41 39 11
[email protected]
internet:

President of the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities visits
Armenia

Yerevan, 05.10.2005 – Giovanni Di Stasi, President of the Congress of
Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe, is paying an
official visit to Armenia from 4 to 6 October. He has met President of
the Republic Robert Kocharyan, Prime Minister Andranik Margaryan,
Speaker of the National Assembly Artur Baghdasaryan, Minister of the
Territorial Administration Hovik Abrahamyan, Minister of Foreign Affairs
Vardan Oskanyan, and Mayor of Yerevan Evand Zakharyan..

During the visit, the Congress President proposed to create a Network of
Local and Regional Authorities from the Caucasian countries. Mr Di Stasi
also confirmed the readiness of the Council of Europe Congress to assist
the Armenian authorities in implementing the amendments to the Armenian
Constitution, in particular concerning the status of the city of
Yerevan.

On 5 October, Mr Di Stasi participated in the opening of the 18th Annual
Seminar of the European Network of Training Institutions for Local and
Regional Authorities (ENTO), organised in co-operation with the Congress
and the Communities Association of Armenia. The aim of the seminar is to
provide a forum for in-depth debate and exchange of information,
experiences, best practices on the theme “Training and Transborder
Cooperation in Europe”. The sub-themes of the seminar are
“Transcaucasian co-operation” and “Training for Emergency Planning”.

The seminar is targeted at directors of training centres, training
project managers, senior executive officers responsible for training and
local public services, decision-makers, local and regional elected
representatives, practitioners and academics involved in the subject.
The seminar format places special emphasis on innovative working
methods, such as the open space method, presentation of national
examples and the best practices and networking.

President Di Stasi, Minister of Territorial Administration Abrahamyan
and the ENTO President Gert Fieguth will give a press conference on
Thursday 6 October at 10.00 a.m. in the building of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs.

During the visit, the President was accompanied by Deputy Chief
Executive of the Congress Antonella Cagniolati and Congress Secretariat
member Vyacheslav Tolkovanov.

For further information please contact
Natalia Lapauri, Communities Association of Armenia (Tel. +374 91404853)

or
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia (Tel. +374
10544041)

To receive our press releases by e-mail, contact :
[email protected]

A political organisation set up in 1949, the Council of Europe works to
promote democracy and human rights continent-wide. It also develops
common responses to social, cultural and legal challenges in its 46
member states.

www.coe.int/press

Serpents Et Demons Cornus: La Propagande Anti-Armenienne D’Un Artist

SERPENTS ET DEMONS CORNUS: LA PROPAGANDE ANTI-ARMENIENNE D’UN ARTISTE AZERI (MAGAZINE)

Agence France Presse
3 octobre 2005 lundi 8:09 AM GMT

BAKOU 2 oct 2005

Sur une swastika, un serpent noir aux crochets suintant du venin
aspire a la domination mondiale, mais en est empeche a temps par des
tenailles metalliques manipulees par six bras puissants.

Ce n’est pas une affiche de propagande de la Seconde guerre mondiale
decrivant les efforts allies pour contenir l’Allemagne nazie, mais
une oeuvre recemment exposee a Bakou, l’une des dernières de Kerim
Kerimov, artiste azerbaïdjanais qui s’est donne pour mission de
denoncer “l’hegemonie armenienne”.

Rampant sur le globe en direction de l’Azerbaïdjan, le serpent
represente l’Armenie qui veut une “Grande Armenie”, assure M.

Kerimov, tandis que les six bras qui tiennent les tenailles sont
ceux des “frères turcs” de l’Azerbaïdjan, comme la Turquie et le
Turkmenistan.

President du Comite national azerbaïdjanais des geophysiciens, M.

Kerimov n’est pas qu’un artiste. C’est un scientifique bien connu des
milieux petroliers pour le rôle qu’il a joue au milieu des annees 1990
dans la signature du “contrat du siècle”, qui a marque le lancement
de la participation occidentale dans le developpement des reserves
petrolières azerbaïdjanaises de la mer Caspienne.

Peu de gens savent qu’il est l’auteur prolifique de dessins politiques
publies depuis un demi-siècle maintenant, dans les journaux sovietiques
puis ceux de l’Azerbaïdjan independant.

Une grande partie de son oeuvre s’en prend a l’Armenie et met en avant
la politique officielle de Bakou contre son voisin qui, suite a une
guerre sanglante au debut des annees 1990, a de fait pris le contrôle
du Nagorny-Karabakh, territoire azerbaïdjanais peuple en majorite
d’Armeniens et qui a proclame unilateralement son independance.

La plupart des gens a Bakou vous diront que l’Azerbaïdjan est entoure
d’ennemis, parmi lesquels bien sûr l’Armenie, forte du soutien russe
et de sa riche diaspora, mais egalement les forces d’opposition en
Azerbaïdjan meme, ainsi que certains ayatollahs iraniens.

M. Kerimov va plus loin encore et trace le portrait d’Armeniens
monstrueux et cornus posant une patte griffue sur la carte de
l’Azerbaïdjan ou placant une bombe geante entre le pays et son
allie turc.

Kerim Kerimov, 72 ans, a appris a dessiner a l’ecole du realisme
socialiste, a une epoque où l’Azerbaïdjan et l’Armenie faisaient
partie d’un meme pays, et se decrit lui meme comme un disciple du
caricaturiste sovietique Boris Efimov.

Et si M. Efimov etait celèbre pour ses dessins de propagande
representant un Hitler difforme, M. Kerimov a pour cible l’ennemi
moderne de l’Azerbaïdjan.

“Je ne veux pas que les Armeniens me considèrent comme un ennemi”,
dit-il cependant, affirmant avoir ete menace de mort par toutes sortes
d'”ennemis” de l’Azerbaïdjan.

“Je veux qu’ils realisent que la politique qu’ils mènent n’est pas
bonne: alors la vie sera meilleure pour nos deux peuples”, estime-t-il.

Mais ses bonnes intentions ont peu de chances d’etre entendues par
les Armeniens, qu’il represente dans ses dessins en demons poilus ou
en membres du Ku Klux Klan en cagoule blanche.

L’Armenie, qui fait l’objet d’un blocus de ses voisins turc et
azerbaïdjanais, est accusee par certains de ses adversaires de chercher
a etendre son territoire.

L’enclave du Nagorny Karabakh, habitee aujourd’hui par quelque 145.000
Armeniens et soutenue par Erevan, s’est unilateralement separee de
l’Azerbaïdjan a l’issue d’un conflit arme qui a fait près de 25.000
morts.

L’Azerbaïdjan ne reconnaît pas les autorites independantistes du
Karabakh et considère que la region est occupee par l’Armenie depuis
le cessez-le-feu de 1994.

–Boundary_(ID_FnP8WaToXVRU4vSEE4MfWg)–

Turkish Author Calls For Full EU Membership For Homeland

TURKISH AUTHOR CALLS FOR FULL EU MEMBERSHIP FOR HOMELAND

Agence France Presse — English
October 3, 2005 Monday 5:31 PM GMT

As Turkey appeared close on Monday to reaching agreement with the
European Union to start accession talks, controversial Turkish author
Orhan Pamuk called for his homeland to be allowed full membership.

“Despite all the criticism of Turkey, I am in favour of it having
full membership of the European Union,” Pamuk said ahead of receiving
a cultural prize awarded by the German city of Darmstadt.

Turkey was due to begin membership negotiations on Monday but Austria’s
reservations over the talks with the predominantly Muslim state forced
foreign ministers into intense negotiations to resolve the standoff.

Austria had said it wanted the possibility written into the
negotiations that Turkey may eventually only be allowed special
partnership status rather than full membership, but late on Monday
it dropped its opposition.

Pamuk, who was recently charged under Turkey’s criminal code with
insulting the national identity after remarks he made about a massacre
under the Ottoman Empire, compared the opposition to his country
joining Europe’s club of 25 nations to someone hanging a “No Entry”
sign on the door.

“The people who have hung up this sign to protect their security,
their possessions and their beliefs, do they have any idea how much
they are insulting others?” Pamuk asked.

Pamuk, the widely translated author of such internationally renowned
works as “The White Castle” and “Snow”, is set to go on trial in
December for telling a Swiss newspaper in February that “one million
Armenians were killed in these lands and nobody but me dares to talk
about it”.

He has said he has received several death threats since being charged.

Verdi’s ‘La Traviata’ To Signal Days Of Armenian-Italian Friendship

VERDI’S ‘LA TRAVIATA’ TO SIGNAL DAYS OF ARMENIAN-ITALIAN FRIENDSHIP
By Melania Badalian

AZG Armenian Daily #177
04/10/2005

Culture

“Song is more precious than bred”, people say in Italy, the country
of civilizations and arts. So there was a point in opening the Days of
Armenian-Italian friendship with Giuseppe Verdi’s famous “La Traviata”
at the National Opera and Ballet Theatre on 2 October.

RA deputy foreign minister Gegham Gharibjanian and Italian ambassador
to Armenia Marco Clemente opened the Armenia-Italian friendship days
that are officially to start on 5 October.

Mr. Gharibjanian presented in outline the role of the Italian culture
and Italy for Armenia, pointing out that Armenian-Italian relations
originate from ancient times.

One month of celebrations, initiated by the Armenian and Italian
governments and supported by the presidents of the states, is
an unprecedented event, Marco Clemente said, “as a foreign state
makes such efforts to present and to promote its culture to another
state. ‘La Traviata’ is the best start of these days”.

The applications for 36 arrangements of these days promise heaps of
surprises and wonderful moments as well as a unique atmosphere of
music, painting, theatre, architecture and cinema in Yerevan. For
the first time the National Gallery of Armenia will display the best
exhibits of the 300-year-long legacy of the Mkhitarist Congregation
of the St. Lazarus Island (valuable canvases, historic items, old
publications).

Europe Can Learn From Turkey’s Past

EUROPE CAN LEARN FROM TURKEY’S PAST
By Mark Mazower

Financial Times (London, England)
October 3, 2005 Monday
Asia Edition 1

In the tormented run-up to the start of Turkey’s membership
negotiations with the European Union, the ghosts of the past are
haunting the government of Tayyip Erdogan.

Orhan Pamuk, a novelist, faces prosecution for “insulting the national
character” in a newspaper interview in which he referred to the death
of a million Armenians during the first world war. It was only after
a flurry of legal threats and patriotic violence that a path-breaking
academic conference into those same events went ahead recently in
Istanbul, bringing together leading Turkish and foreign scholars to
discuss the subject for the first time on Turkish soil.

Does all this portend change or demonstrate how deeply entrenched
the resistance to it is? EU officials have been reminding the Turks
of the virtues of free speech, while sceptics about the merits of
Turkish accession have seen these events as justifying their doubts.

The Turks are not unused to being criticised, of course, for western
pressure for reform long predates the formation of the EU. As far
back as the 1830s, European ambassadors routinely told the Ottoman
sultans how and why they should become more like them.

Now, as then, one wonders: which Europe are the Turks being asked
to emulate; the noble ideal in whose name rights and liberties are
demanded or the region as it actually is? Valery Giscard D’Estaing,
the former French president, commented recently that Turkey is “not a
European country”. Had he forgotten that women got the vote in France,
Italy, Switzerland and Belgium many years after they did in Mustafa
Kemal Ataturk’s Turkish republic? Or that France’s sense of national
identity is fragile enough to be threatened by schoolchildren wearing
heardscarves and by rightwing nutcases denying the Holocaust?

It is not only in Turkey that national anxieties prompt the curtailment
of individual self-expression and historical discussion.

The current government in Ankara has, in fact, presided over a
remarkably rapid legal and institutional overhaul: just last year
it pushed a new penal code through parliament at the prompting of
the EU. If anything, the transformation has been too rapid. Although
getting rid of the 1930 code, which was borrowed from fascist Italy,
was overdue, plenty of the old impulses remain enshrined in its
replacement. It is still illegal, for example, to insult or belittle
state institutions. We easily forget that in much of Europe this was
an offence until fairly recently. An expanded version of the medieval
crime of lese majeste protected the honour of many 19th century
national leaders and heads of state and culminated between the world
wars in penal codes that lent even the lowliest public functionary
immunity from public criticism. Such provisions faded from view only
under the glare of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights (though
easily abused defamation laws still – in Austria for example – remain
on the books). As a result, Turkish law’s continued protection of the
symbols and the honour of the state has become an anachronism, like
the provisions that shore up the sacralised monarchies of south-east
Asia and the Gulf.

The penalisation of discussion of the Armenian genocide is a similar
kind of hangover from the past. After the great war, some of the
most liberal of the new European states criminalised any questioning
of the circumstances of their origin. In the 1920s, Czechoslovakia
and Estonia, for example, felt so unsure of themselves that they
outlawed what they termed opposition to the state “because of its
origins”. In western Europe, the contemporary criminalisation of
neo-Nazi sentiment and Holocaust denial is a phenomenon closely
related to this, reflecting postwar unease about the fragility of
democratic traditions and testifying to the well-founded suspicion that
without the intervention of the Big Three during the second world war,
rightwing authoritarian rule in the EU heartlands might have lasted
well after 1945.

Today, moreover, even as Turkey is being asked to liberalise its legal
system, Europe is moving in the other direction. Influenced by the
post-9/11 fight against terrorism, crimes of opinion are again under
discussion, though matters have not yet reached thelevel of the US
which, as we see in the recent under-reported convictionof New York
University graduate student Mohammed Yousry, now seems prepared to
criminalise even professional translation and academic research.

Yet it is one thing to say that others are in no position to throw
stones and another to condone the Turkish penal code’s assault on
historical argument. In this matter, the over-zealous prosecutors
are wrong and prime minister Erdogan is right: a confident nation
should allow free debate. Moving the discussion of what happened
to Armenians out of the realm of politics and back into history
will certainly demolish some hallowed nationalist myths. We will
learn how it came about that many hundreds of thousands of Armenian
civilians were killed and who planned and carried out the crime. We
will also learn more about the war during which those events took
place and in particular about the part played by the great powers,
especially Russia, and their plans to partition the empire. We may
learn, too, more about the long-forgotten backdrop – the decades of
Muslim dispossession from former Ottoman lands in Europe and the
millions of refugees this generated. The end result will be less
serviceable to the political concerns of this or that side, but far
more beneficial to both Armenian historical memory and the vitality
of Turkish intellectual life.

As important, it may offer a precedent for how to deal with the most
neuralgic aspects of one’s past that not a few European countries could
learn from. Democratisation and glasnost need not be a one-way street.

The writer, professor of history at Columbia University, is author
of Salonica, City of Ghosts (Harper-Collins/Knopf)

Diocese Makes Contribution to Katrina Relief Efforts

Western Diocese of the Armenian Church of America
3325 North Glenoaks Blvd.
Burbank, Ca 91504
Tel: 818-558-7474
Fax: 818-558-6333
Web:

WESTERN DICOESE FORWARDS INITIAL INSTALLMENT OF $20,000 THROUGH
AMERICAN RED CROSS
TO KATRINA VICTIMS

First Installment of $30,000 of Aid to St. John Garabed

Armenian Church in Baton Rouge Sent Last Week

As the community and faithful are well aware, victims of the
devastating Hurricane Katrina are still in dire need of help. Thanks
to the efforts initiated by His Eminence Archbishop Hovnan Derderian,
Primate of the Western Diocese, a Diocesan-wide fundraising is still
in effect in the Western Diocese.

In his initial plea the Primate urged the faithful to lend a helping
hand to the victims, as a result of which a large number of faithful
sent their contributions to both the Diocese, as well as directly to
the Red Cross.

As a first installment of aid, the Western Diocese has forwarded a
check for $20,000 representing sums collected thus far, to the Red
Cross.

We would like to remind the faithful that during the tsunami in the
Indian Ocean last year, the Western Diocese organized a similar
fundraising thanks to which the Diocese contributed $28,100.55 to the
American Red Cross. We once again make a plea to the faithful of the
Diocese to contribute and support the fundraising efforts, to help
the victims of Hurricane Katrina. Let us recall that following the
1988 earthquake in Armenia several countries came to our immediate
assistance, with humanitarian aid. It is now our turn to do the same,
for all those who have suffered.

We extend our gratitude to the faithful of the Western Diocese who
have already contributed to this effort.

Checks can be made payable to:

Armenian Church Western Diocese (In Memo: Hurricane Katrina)

3325 N. Glenoaks Boulevard

Burbank, CA 91504.

Please contact the Diocese at (818) 558-7474, for further
information.

OFFICE OF THE WESTERN DIOCESE

October 3, 2005

Burbank, California

http://www.armenianchurchwd.com/

Athens: At Turkey’s heart, a major paradox

Kathimerini, Greece
Oct 1 2005

At Turkey’s heart, a major paradox

A letter by Turkish Ambassador to Paris Uluc Ozulker that was
published yesterday in the French daily Le Figaro in which he
portrayed Greek Orthodox Ecumenical Patriarch Vartholomaios, who is
based in Istanbul, as a local religious leader is one more piece of
evidence that our eastern neighbor is far from ready to come under
the European Union roof. Turkey has a long path to tread before
reaching the EU’s political and institutional standards. European
political culture is even further away.

The letter by the Turkish envoy pales in comparison to the legal suit
against acclaimed novelist Orhan Pamuk (after his comments about
Turkey’s killing of Armenians and Kurds) and the court decision
halting a conference on the Armenian massacre under Ottoman rule. But
the political origins of the incidents are common – they are all
products of Ankara’s state ideology. Although clouds are gathering
over Turkey’s EU ambitions, Ankara continues to provoke people’s
democratic sensitivities. Sure, Turkey is not trying to put
additional obstacles in its path; its reaction is in keeping with its
character – and it is not willing to change mentality and practices.

True, the government of Recep Tayyip Erdogan has taken significant
steps in introducing EU-minded legal reforms. But their
implementation has been sorely lacking. Moreover, Ankara seems more
interested in formalities than in real implementation. It all seems
to boil down to the big paradox at the heart of the Turkish
establishment: Ankara is, on the one hand, in favor of EU membership,
but, on the other, it fears that European principles could also
unmake Turkey.

Caught up in this internal contradiction, Ankara wants membership
without having to adapt. Above all, it insists on seeing itself as a
fortress state. Its diplomatic maneuvering underscores a desire to
join the bloc on its own terms. In short, Turkey wants the rights
without the responsibilities, which demonstrates that the candidate
country is a complete stranger to European political norms.

There is no such thing as Europe a la carte. As time goes by, Turkey
will be faced with an inescapable dilemma. It will either launch the
process that will transform it for good or the enterprise of full
membership will degenerate into a special partnership. Turkey has no
place in the European house unless it remakes itself.