Declaration on ending war cannot be considered comprehensive settlement of NK conflict – FM

Save

Share

 21:02,

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 12, ARMENPRESS. Foreign Minister of Armenia Zohrab Mnatsakanyan held telephone conversations with Foreign Minister of Russia Sergey Lavrov, Foreign Minister of France Jean-Yves Le Drian and Deputy Secretary of State of the US Stephen Biegun, ARMENPRESS was informed from the press service of the MFA Armenia.

The interlocutors exchanged views on the situation following the November 10 declaration of Prime Minister of Armenia, Presidents of Russia and Azerbaijan. Minister Mnatsakanyan emphasized that the mentioned declaration is about establishment of ceasefire and deployment of peacekeepers in Artsakh and cannot be assessed as a comprehensive solution to Nagorno Karabakh conflict.

The Armenian FM and the high representatives of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-chair countries also referred to the central role of Turkey in preparing, inciting and carrying out the war by Azerbaijan against Artsakh, which was manifested by both being directly involved in the military operations and sending foreign terrorists to the conflict zone. Mnatsakanyan clearly emphasized that any role of Turkey in peacekeeping mission must be ruled out, despite the attempts of that country.

The Armenian Foreign Minister expressed deep concern over the fate of the Armenian cultural heritage in the territories that has appeared under Azerbaijani control. Mnatsakanyan emphasized that the international community is well aware of the barbaric treatment of Azerbaijan towards the Armenian cultural heritage, as a result of which numerous pieces of the Armenian heritage have been destroyed in Nakhichevan, Azerbaijan and in Artsakh during the first Artsakh war.

The Interlocutors emphasized the importance of the continuation of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-chairs' format as the only internationally authorized format. Zohrab Mnatsakanyan emphasized that any issue over the Nagorno Karabakh peace process should be discussed exclusively in the sidelines of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-chairmanship. Mnatsakanyan emphasized the status of Artsakh and the full assurance of the security of the people of Artsakh as priorities.

Russian peacekeepers move to area of operations in Nagorno Karabakh

Save

Share

 10:41,

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 11, ARMENPRESS. The Russian peacekeepers sent to observe the armistice in Nagorno Karabakh are moving to their positions, TASS reported citing the Russian Defense Ministry.

"The military columns will have to travel more than 250 kilometers and deploy a peacekeeping contingent with the deployment of Russian observation posts along the contact line in Nagorno-Karabakh and along the Lachinsky corridor," TASS quoted the defense ministry as saying.

It was reported earlier that Russian Ilyushin Il-76 military transport aircraft have already delivered more than 400 Russian peacekeepers to Armenia.

"At present, twenty Il-76 military transport aircraft with commanding officers of the Russian peacekeeping forces and military personnel of the 15th peacekeeping brigade have landed in the Republic of Armenia. The military transport aircraft have delivered more than 400 military personnel, armored personnel carriers, armored vehicles and communications devices," the ministry said.

A total of 1,960 servicemen, 90 armored personnel carriers, 380 units of car and special equipment will be deployed.

Editing by Stepan Kocharyan

Nagorno-Karabakh Says Its Two Largest Cities Under Fierce Attack

U.S. News
Nov 6 2020


By Margarita Antidze

TBILISI (Reuters) – Three residents of Nagorno-Karabakh's largest city were killed during overnight shelling by Azeri forces, the enclave's ethnic Armenian-controlled Emergency and Rescue Service said on Friday, as the battle for control of its major settlements intensified.

Azerbaijan denied the reports of shelling in Stepanakert. Two independent observers said fighting appeared to be moving deeper into the enclave, with Azeri troops stepping up attacks on its biggest two cities.

At least 1,000 people – and possibly many more – have died in nearly six weeks of fighting in and around Nagorno-Karabakh, a mountainous enclave internationally recognised as part of Azerbaijan but populated and controlled by ethnic Armenians.

The conflict has underlined the influence of Turkey, an ally of Azerbaijan, in a former Soviet region long dominated by Moscow, which has a defence pact with Armenia. It also threatens the security of Azeri oil and gas pipelines.

The Nagorno-Karabakh Emergency and Rescue Service said residential buildings and public infrastructure in Stepanakert had been targeted. It said that the three people killed had been inside the same house.

Reuters was unable independently to verify these reports. Three sources working in Stepanakert said that the city – known in Azerbaijan as Khankendi – had come under heavy shelling late on Thursday.

Shushi, 15 km (9 miles) to the south and the enclave's second-largest city, had also come under bombardment overnight and several houses were on fire, the Emergency and Rescue Service said. The city is of strategic importance to both sides.

Azerbaijan's defence ministry said allegations that it had shelled civilian areas were "misinformation".

It has previously accused Armenian-controlled forces of shelling cities under its control, including Terter and Barda, as well as Ganja, the second-largest city in Azerbaijan. Dozens were killed in those attacks.

Thomas de Waal, analyst at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and author of a book on the 1990s Nagorno-Karabakh war, said the conflict appeared to be moving toward a potentially bloody battle for Shushi, known to Azeris as Shusha.

"Shusha has great importance for Azerbaijanis, as a cultural and historical centre and the town where they had a majority population before the war," de Waal told Reuters.

"That is almost certainly why their military operation was diverted from Lachin towards the city," he said. "It has great importance for Armenians too: it sits above Stepanakert and is the site of Karabakh's cathedral."

BROKEN CEASEFIRES

Three ceasefires have failed to halt the bloodiest fighting in the South Caucasus for more than 25 years. Both sides accused each other of launching attacks within hours of an agreement on Oct. 30 to avoid deliberately targeting civilians.

The Nagorno-Karabakh defence ministry said combat operations continued overnight along all major sections of the front line. It said that "multiple attempts" to attack Shushi were repelled.

Olesya Vartanyan, Crisis Group's Tbilisi-based senior analyst for the South Caucasus, told Reuters that fighting near Shushi had "been intensifying during the last week, with more face-to-face clashes closer to the town".

"The side that controls Shushi automatically gains control over Stepanakert," she said. "Even if Baku decides to stop the war after taking Shushi, this will still significantly decrease the chance of ethnic Armenians returning to their homes in Stepanakert."

The Nagorno-Karabakh defence ministry says 1,177 of its troops have been killed. Azerbaijan does not disclose its military casualties, while Russia has estimated 5,000 deaths on both sides.

Around 30,000 people were killed in the 1991-94 war.

(Reporting by Margarita Antidze in Tbilisi, Nvard Hovhannisyan in Yerevan and Nailia Bagirova in Baku; Writing by Robin Paxton; Editing by Alex Richardson)

TURKISH press: Turkish business delegation to visit Baku

Chairpersons and members of Turkey's leading economic civil society organizations and Azerbaijani officials will come together for a meeting in Baku tomorrow.

The meeting will be organized by the Turkish Trade and Industry Chamber (Türk TSO) and chaired by the Union of Chambers and Commodity Exchanges of Turkey (TOBB).

The special-agenda visit to the Caspian nation comes as part of Turkey's wider support for Baku amid its efforts to liberate the Armenian-occupied Nagorno-Karabakh.

The business delegation will include TOBB Chairman Rifat Hisarcıklıoğlu, who also heads Türk TSO, Confederation of Turkish Tradesman and Craftsman (TESK) Chairperson Bendevi Palandöken, Confederation of Turkish Trade Unions (Türk-Iş) Chairperson Ergün Atalay, Ali Yalçın – who heads Turkey's largest civil servants' union Memur-Sen, Turkish Public Workers' Labor Union (Kamu-Sen) Chairperson Önder Kahveci, Hak-Iş Trade Union Confederation Chair Mahmut Arslan, Metin Demir – a supervisory board member of the Turkish Confederation of Employer Associations (TISK) and other TOBB members.

Along with Turkey and Azerbaijan, representatives from Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan will also participate in the meeting.

Secretary-General of the Turkic Council, Ambassador Baghdad Amreyev, Azerbaijani Economy Minister Mikail Cabbarov and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Ramiz Hasanov are also expected to participate in the meeting.

TOBB's Hisarcıklıoğlu is also expected to be received by Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev.

Türk TSO was established under the Turkic Council with an agreement signed in Kazakhstan’s capital on May 17, 2019. The permanent secretariat of the organization is located in Istanbul.

CivilNet: Azerbaijan Uses White Phosphorus Munitions in Karabakh

CIVILNET.AM

05:33

A video footage released from Karabakh on Friday shows Azerbaijani forces firing white phosphorus munitions over major forests in the region.

In the video, white phosphorus can be seen falling on trees in a forested area of Karabakh, sparking fears of potential fires.

According to the Protocol III of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, the use of air-dropped incendiary weapons against military objectives within a concentration of civilians is simply prohibited.

Per Reuters, white phosphorus munitions can be used on battlefields to make smoke screens, generate illumination, mark targets or burn bunkers and buildings.

When a white phosphorus shell explodes, the chemical inside reacts with the air, creating a thick white cloud. When it comes in contact with flesh, it can maim and kill by burning to the bone.

“White phosphorous weapons spread burning phosphorous, which burns at over 800 degrees centi grade (about 1,500 degrees fahrenheit), over a wide area, up to several hundred square meters. The burning will continue until the phosphorous has been completely depleted or until it no longer is exposed to oxygen. The weapon has a potential to cause particularly horrific and painful injuries or slow painful death,” Peter Herbya, head of International Committee of the Red Cross, had said in an interview.

Madrid Principles are Blueprint—and Carte Blanche—for Baku’s Aggression

October 29,  2020



OSCE Minks Group mediators meet with Armenia’s Foreign Minister Zohrab Mnatsakanyan in Moscow on Oct. 13

BY ARA KHACHATOURIAN

The so-called Madrid Principles, based on which the OSCE Minsk Group Co-chairs have been mediating a settlement to the Karabakh conflict served as a blueprint for Azerbaijan to launch an aggressive attack on Artsakh beginning on September 27.

Since then Azerbaijan’s president Ilham Aliyev has wasted no opportunity to tell the world, including over last weekend during an interview with Fox News, that since the settlement of the conflict, in his view, was stalling he was exercising his right to settle the conflict based on the very provisions—or steps—outlined in the Madrid Principles.

First discussed in 2007, Madrid Principles set forth a proposed formula which calls for Artsakh’s up-front surrender of seven regions of its sovereign territory in return for only a vague promise that Azerbaijan will allow a future “_expression_ of will” that would determine its status, setting the stage for continued conflict and increased regional instability.

These principles, which tepidly were accepted by the sides as the basis for the negotiations, essentially were designed to appease Azerbaijan.

  • Artsakh was supposed to relinquish territory, without being able to negotiate for the return of its own lands that were stolen by Azerbaijan—Shahumyan, Getashen, Martunashen.
  • Artsakh was supposed to turn the other cheek, because no where in the Madrid Principles was Azerbaijan being held accountable for its gruesome pogroms in Sumgait, Kirovabad (currently Ganja, historically Gandzak), Baku, Maragha, Shahumyan and the list goes on.
  • Artsakh was also supposed to sit back and allow others to determine its “status,” despite the fact that its people voted to leave the Soviet Union and become an independent republic—that cherished inalienable right to self-determination.

Since the 2016 April War, and subsequent violations of the 1994 ceasefire agreement by Azerbaijan, the Madrid Principles were never amended to require security guarantees for the people of Artsakh. Furthermore, Baku did not have to pay a price for its brutal aggression in the 2016 war and subsequent—and continued—violation of the ceasefire agreement.

Instead what Aliyev adopted as his motto were declarations that Azerbaijan would militarily resolve the conflict, including the “liberation of Yerevan,” which he called historic Azerbaijani territory. To add to this equation, Aliyev declared all Armenians around the world to be “enemies of Azerbaijan,” based on which he adopted what has become known as Armenophobic hysteria throughout his country.

Before 2016, of course, among many examples, was the Safarov affair, which saw an ax-murderer being treated as a national hero for killing an Armenian soldier in his sleep.

None of this gave pause to the OSCE Minsk Group Co-chairs, because they were determined to mediate a settlement based on the Madrid Principles. Their false parity when it came to warnings to the sides became commonplace. Their turning a deaf ear to the military threats from Baku became the norm. The co-chairs were not even moved to act when Aliyev went on national television in July and called them “useless” and challenged their authority by saying “who are these co-chairs to tell me I can’t get what I want through military means.”

Not even a week after that broadcast, Azerbaijani forces brazenly attacked civilian and military targets in Armenia. A week later, Turkey and Azerbaijan held military exercises for a week very near to the Artsakh border. It’s become evident that Turkey left behind its military equipment in Azerbaijan, including U.S.-made F-16 fighter jets and other heavy artillery all in preparation for what was to come in September.

The September 27 attacks didn’t even move the Minsk Group co-chairs, who in their first statement, expressed “concern” for the escalation of violence and urged “both sides” to observe the ceasefire.

Today, three ceasefire agreements later, each being brokered by one of the co-chairing countries, has been violated by Azerbaijan. Yet still the mediators are calling on “all sides” to adhere to the agreements, because their bible—the Madrid Principles—awaits another round of negotiations despite the war crimes committed against the people of Artsakh and regardless of the fact that Turkey has entered the conflict, backed by mercenaries, who are becoming active players in the region.

Baku’s actions have gone unchecked for so long that Aliyev thought he could put into action all his threats, because, at the end of the day, principles on which a settlement would be negotiated would give Azerbaijan the upper hand.

On Thursday, Armenia’s Foreign Ministry announced that Yerevan’s top diplomat will be traveling to Geneva Friday to meet with his Azerbaijani counterpart, Jeyhun Bayramov and the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs. The Foreign Ministry also said that the implementation of the ceasefire agreements reached during the past three weeks would be the only topic of discussion at this meeting.

It has been proven, time and again, that the Madrid Principles can only cause instability and become a real threat to regional security. At the same time these principles also give carte blanche to Azerbaijan to advance war and perpetuate the bloodshed that is now threatening the very existence of Artsakh.

Azerbaijan openly and demonstratively sabotages efforts of international mediators – MFA Artsakh

Save

Share

 18:00,

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 24, ARMENPRESS. The Foreign Ministry of Artsakh issued a statement, emphasizing that Azerbaijan and Turkey take deliberate actions aimed at thwarting the peace initiatives of ending the military operations, ARMENPRESS was informed from the press service of the Foreign Ministry of Artsakh.

 ‘’During October 23, the Azerbaijani-Turkish armed forces fired rockets and artillery shells at a number of settlements of the Republic of Artsakh. On the same day, in the evening hours, Artsakh’s capital Stepanakert was subjected to an intense missile attack. As a result, damage was caused to civilian infrastructure, and there were casualties among the civilian population. It is noteworthy that the missile attack on Stepanakert was launched immediately after the separate meetings held in Washington, D.C. between US Secretary of State Michael Pompeo and Foreign Ministers of the Republics of Armenia and Azerbaijan with the aim of achieving a truce in the Azerbaijan-Karabakh conflict zone.

The timing and the target of the strike leave no doubt that Azerbaijan is openly and ostentatiously undermining the efforts of international mediators to end the aggression against the Republic of Artsakh. Earlier, the Azerbaijani authorities disrupted the implementation of the agreements on a humanitarian truce reached on October 10 at the initiative of the President of Russia, and on October 17 at the initiative of the President of France.

These consistent and purposeful actions of Azerbaijan, which enjoys the full military and political support of Turkey, indicate that the war is a conscious choice of the Azerbaijani authorities. This very fact does not allow the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chair countries and the international community as a whole to make progress in their attempts to stop the hostilities and resume the peace settlement process. The vicious circle created by Azerbaijan, the repeated declarations of empty verbal promises to cease fire and the simultaneous continuation of armed aggression, can be broken through international recognition of the independence of the Republic of Artsakh and the application of sanctions against Azerbaijan, including the individual ones – against the top leadership of this country’’, reads the statement.

Armenian president wants NATO to explain Turkish involvement in Nagorno-Karabakh

Politico
Oct 17 2020

Armenia’s president is demanding answers from NATO over the involvement of Turkey in the Nagorno-Karabakh war.

Armen Sarkissian says he’s ready to travel to Brussels to confront the transatlantic alliance over Ankara’s actions in the Caucasus and warn the European Union of the threat they pose to the bloc’s security.

“If I go to Brussels,” he said in an interview with POLITICO, “I would like to speak to the NATO leadership as to why this very strange situation is taking place where Turkey, a full NATO member, is involved in a war that has nothing to do with NATO. How on earth is it that a NATO member is acting as freely as a cowboy and NATO does nothing? Does this mean they have a green light from NATO?” 

Turkey threw its weight behind traditional ally Azerbaijan when the frozen conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh — an Armenian-controlled enclave internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan — reignited last month. The fighting has cost hundreds of lives, with both sides accusing each other of killing civilians.

Armenia is accusing Turkey of sending fighter jets and Syrian mercenaries to Azerbaijan. Ankara has denied this, though several media reports have documented the presence of Syrian fighters and F-16s. Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev has acknowledged Turkish F-16s are present in the country but claimed they were not used in the fighting.

Sarkissian said he wanted to visit NATO’s Brussels headquarters to “get explanations” as to why “Turkish weapons, drones and F-16 are involved in the process of bombing Armenia and Armenian civilians in huge numbers. These are NATO-made weapons: the engines from Austria, the avionics are from Canada and the parts of the rockets are from Britain and so on.” 

NATO members are not treaty-bound to support each other’s external wars or seek permission for them and have frequently been involved in conflicts with third parties without the alliance’s support — including multiple U.S., British and French interventions across Africa, Asia and the Middle East since the bloc’s formation. (NATO did not respond to a request for comment by the time of publication.)

Sarkissian said he was also ready to travel to Paris, London and Berlin to make Armenia’s case to European leaders.

“I am ready to tell [Angela] Merkel,” he said, “that I understand that Europe is busy with other things and everyone is busy with COVID-19, but dear Madam Chancellor what you are probably not seeing clearly is that there is another disaster coming from the Caucasus to you that is not a biological virus but the virus of instability and war.” 

Sarkissian said he wanted the German chancellor to understand that “the war of Turkey and Azerbaijan risks creating another Syria. Or making Turkey the creator and the ruler of an energy crisis to Europe.” (Pipelines crucial to the EU’s energy supply pass close to Nagorno-Karabakh.)

In contrast, he does not feel the need to remind French President Emmanuel Macron about the conflict’s potential geopolitical ramifications.

“I think that Macron understands that instability in the Caucasus is going to hit the larger region and then it will affect Western Europe,” Sarkissian said. “He understands that the Turkish presence in Azerbaijan will make Southern Europe and Central Asia all dependent on Turkey and Turkey will emerge as a regional superpower and that is what [Turkish President Recep Tayyip] Erdoğan wants to achieve.”  

France, home to a sizable Armenian minority, has seen a bill introduced to the parliament to recognize the so-called Republic of Artsakh, the entity governing Nagorno-Karabakh. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has said he expects France to recognize Nagorno-Karabakh but a measure actually passing remains highly unlikely. 

So far, no United Nations member has recognized Nagorno-Karabakh as an independent state — not even Armenia itself. 

Sarkissian said he would be “very happy” if France recognized the breakaway region. “As Armenians, we have always believed that a solution has to be reached through peaceful negotiations and in order not to make things worse, this has restrained us from recognizing the Republic of Artsakh until now.” 

He added: “But of course if we don’t see light at the end of the tunnel we will recognize Nagorno-Karabakh.”   

Armenia is seeking to present the war to Brussels as part and parcel of Turkey’s growing assertiveness, which has brought Ankara into conflict with EU member countries across the region. In Libya, Turkey has intervened on behalf of the U.N.-backed government against France-backed militia leader Khalifa Haftar and in the Eastern Mediterranean, Turkish ships are searching for energy resources in waters claimed by Greece and Cyprus. 

“You get the impression,” said Sarkissian, “that Erdoğan is creating instability and breaking the status quo all around. In this sea of instability, Turkey feels quite calm and is swimming as it gives them a chance to play with everyone.”   

Sarkissian said that Europe’s and NATO’s seeming inability to influence Ankara risked their credibility. 

“I am calling on everybody in Brussels to put pressure on Turkey. But first, they have to decide what is acceptable as these Turkish actions are going to hurt NATO, its prestige and the very idea [that] it is an alliance that is there to defend against an enemy.”

He stressed that he believed Turkish intervention would permanently reshape the geopolitics of the South Caucasus by turning Azerbaijan into a springboard for Turkish influence across the wider region and its crucial pipeline network. 

He also warned that Syrian mercenaries could prove a long-term destabilizing factor in the region: “They will create another zone of instability there menacing Azerbaijan, Russia, Armenia and Iran.”

Beyond Europe, Sarkissian lamented that countries were busy with other things, such as the upcoming U.S. election. “I would go to Washington if they would listen to me,” he said. 

Russia — a treaty ally of Armenia that has in the past also delivered weapons to Azerbaijan — has so far opted not to back Yerevan militarily. The Kremlin has, however, been the lead diplomatic force in the conflict in recent weeks, negotiating a failed cease-fire.

“I appreciate what President [Vladimir] Putin and Foreign Minister [Sergey] Lavrov are doing,” said Sarkissian.  

Armenian officials have repeatedly said they view the conflict not merely as a clash over disputed territories but as a continuation of the 1915 Armenian genocide, which saw as many as 1.5 million Armenians killed by the Ottoman Empire.

Sarkissian claimed Turkey wanted to “not only to teach a lesson to Armenia and tell Armenia what happened 105 years [ago] but say ‘why don’t you shut up, Armenians’ as you will have another genocide in 2020 and this will happen under the eyes of [the] international community.”  

Turkey and Azerbaijan say Baku’s war is about ending the occupation of territories that are internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan. (The Turkish embassy in Brussels did not respond to a request for comment.)

 Yet Sarkissian insisted: “They are fighting a war of ethnic cleansing to make a piece of land without Armenians.”


How the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict could impact Israel’s regional strategic landscape

Jewish News Syndicate
Oct 15 2020
 
 
 
Many Iranian Azeris, who estimates suggest may comprise up to a quarter or even a third of Iran's population, have been demonstrating against Iran’s support for Armenia, while praising Israel for its deep strategic ties with Azerbaijan.
 
By Sean Savage
 
 
( / JNS) Over the last several weeks, Armenia and Azerbaijan have been engaged in an escalating conflict centered around a decades-long dispute over the Nagorno-Karabakh region, which is internationally recognized as Azerbaijani territory but has illegally occupied by Armenia since their first war ended in 1994.
 
While this conflict seemingly revolves around a dispute between two small Caucasus countries, it has larger regional and even global implications.
 
While the conflict in the Caucasus does not directly threaten Israel, its long-standing close ties with Azerbaijan and fledgling relations with Armenia—coupled with the larger geopolitical landscape of the region involving heavyweights Turkey, Russia and Iran—put the Jewish state on high alert for developments.
 
“Israel and Azerbaijan maintain a strategic alliance. It is not just about arms sales or oil, but a very deep strategic cooperation,” Brenda Shaffer, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Global Energy Center, told JNS.
 
“Azerbaijan’s long-term open friendship with Israel has helped other Muslim-majority states establish open cooperation with Israel and even contributed to the current blossoming of ties between Israel and several Muslim-majority states, like the UAE.”
 
She said that “Azerbaijan, despite bordering Iran, was not afraid to openly cooperate with Israel over the years. This showed other Muslim majority states that they can, without worrying about repercussions from Iran or other states, establish open cooperation with Israel.”
 
Armenian military officials say that 532 soldiers have been killed since Sept. 27, when hostilities began. Azerbaijan has not disclosed how many soldiers have been killed, though reports that 42 civilians have died since the start of fighting.
 
On Sept. 10, Armenia and Azerbaijan signed a Russian-brokered truce stipulating that a cease-fire should eventually led to a deal on settling the conflict.
 
However, in the days following the ceasefire, renewed clashes have taken place with both sides blaming the other for continued attacks in violating of the agreement.
 
On Tuesday, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo urged both sides to implement the ceasefire.
 
“We deplore the loss of human life and remain committed to a peaceful settlement,” said Pompeo.
 
‘Exert pressure on public opinion’
 
Indeed, as the fighting intensified in recent weeks, Israel has come under fire for its close military ties with Azerbaijan. Social-media video emerged in early October showing Israeli-made LORA short-range ballistic missiles being used by Azerbaijani forces against Armenia military targets. Similarly, Azerbaijani officials have confirmed the use of Israeli-made drones as well.
 
The use of Israeli-made weapons against Armenia, which also has diplomatic relations with Jerusalem, has led to a diplomatic row between the two countries after Armenia recalled its ambassador to Israel over the arms sales in early October.
 
Similarly, the head of the self-declared Artsakh Republic, which is the Armenian-backed illegal government of Nagorno-Karabakh region, accused Israel of being complicit in Azerbaijan’s “genocidal” war.
 
At the same time, Israel’s Supreme Court also rejected a petition to ban arms sales to Azerbaijan, saying there was a lack of evidence that Israeli-made weapons were being used for war crimes against Armenia.
 
“Israel has friendly ties with the Armenian people and is home to a vibrant Armenian community. On strategic issues, however, the two states are on different sides. Armenia has close cooperation with Iran, and much of the military supplies to Armenia today transit Iranian territory,” said Shaffer.
 
“In the grand scheme of things, the longer the conflict is on high flames, the greater the chance Israel will be confronted by other countries.”
 
Azerbaijani Ambassador to the United States Elin Suleymanov accused Armenia of attempting to cause a wider confrontation by drawing in international players such as Turkey, Russia and Israel. “Azerbaijan and Israel have a very wide-ranging relationship. It’s very comprehensive and by far not limited to military cooperation, although security and defense is, of course, an important factor in these ties,” he told JNS.
 
“Azerbaijan is a country that is under attack and an illegal occupation, so it’s natural that Azerbaijan buys military equipment for self-defense,” continued Suleymanov. “We buy from many countries, including Russia, Turkey and Israel. The Armenian side exaggerates this issue and focuses on Israel so much in order to exert pressure on public opinion.”
 
Instead, Suleymanov noted that Azerbaijan is being attacked from its own territory by an illegal occupying force.
 
“It is fundamentally important to understand that all fighting today is taking place within the internationally recognized territories of Azerbaijan. An Armenian army is illegally inside the territory of Azerbaijan, killing and bombing our civilians,” he told JNS. “Azerbaijan has repeatedly stated that we have no military objectives on territories of Armenia and we do not plan to attack Armenia.”
 
‘Threaten gas markets in Europe’
 
Indeed, both Armenia and Azerbaijan are former Soviet Republics, regaining their independence following the collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s. Since then they have been stuck in an unresolved conflict over the Nagorno-Karabakh region, which is internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan, but now controlled and occupied by ethnic Armenians.
 
The current round of fighting between is the second stage of fighting that began last July. During the summer conflict, Armenia attacked Azerbaijani towns along their international border, about 300 kilometers north of where the current fighting is taking place.
 
“Azerbaijan is now showing Armenia that there are costs and risks in its attacks.”
 
During the July flare-up, Armenia sought to undermine the security of the energy corridor. That area is also close to several strategic oil pipelines running from the Caspian Sea to the Black Sea and the Mediterranean, which also supply some 40 percent of Israel’s oil. In addition to oil, that area also hosts the Southern Gas Corridor, which is a new pipeline that will supply natural gas to Europe.
 
“Moscow is likely to have supported Armenia’s attacks in July on Azerbaijan in close proximity to the energy corridor,” said Shaffer, adding that it was done to “to signal to Azerbaijan not to attempt to threaten its gas markets in Europe.”
 
Additionally, Armenian Defense Minister Davit Tonoyan has also pushed a new military doctrine with the aim to control all of its occupied territories, termed “New Wars for New Territories,” which indicated that Azerbaijan needed to fear it could lose even more territories if it sought to take its territories back.
 
“The current round of fighting is connected to the July phase. Azerbaijan is now showing Armenia that there are costs and risks in its attacks on Azerbaijan as well,” said Shaffer.
 
While the Armenian-occupied Nagorno-Karabakh region is at the center of the dispute between the two countries, Shaffer noted that most of the current fighting is actually taking place in seven additional districts occupied by Armenia during the war back in the early 1990s.
 
“This is an aspect that most of the world press has missed—that most of the area Armenia occupies is outside Nagorno-Karabakh,” she said, adding that Armenia has been expanding settlements in the areas outside of Nagorno-Karabakh and has rejected peace offers over the years to leave these areas.
 
‘A challenge for Tehran’
 
While it’s unlikely that Israel would be pulled into the conflict in any capacity, the Jewish state’s support for Azerbaijan could harm its relations with other allies, such as Cyprus and Greece.
 
“Israel and Azerbaijan maintain a strategic alliance. It is not just about arms sales or oil.”
 
“Israel will be criticized by Western countries for providing the Azeris with drones, which have been massacring Armenian targets, and by her close Hellenic allies for taking a side with Turkey (a longtime rival of the Cypriots and Greeks) and against Armenia (having strong political, cultural and religious ties with Greece),” Benjamin Weil, director of the project for Israel’s National Security at the Endowment for Middle East Truth, told JNS.
 
“In the grand scheme of things, the longer the conflict is on high flames, the greater the chance Israel will be confronted by other countries,” he said.
 
Nevertheless, the conflict in the Caucasus could also create a new front in the ongoing tensions between Israel and Iran.
 
Iran, which shares a border with Azerbaijan and is also home to a large population of Azeris, has strong ties with Armenia.
 
“[Armenian] Prime Minister [Nikol] Pashinyan, during his visit last year to Iran, offered for Armenia to serve as a transit state for Iranian gas to Europe. Armenia has a military unit in Syria that operates under the Russian forces there,” said Shaffer.
 
Additionally, Russia, which does not share a border with Armenia, is supplying the country with weapons via Iran.
 
“Tehran’s support for Armenia and its occupation of Azerbaijani incenses many members of the Azerbaijani community in Iran, and this could create a challenge for Tehran,” said Shaffer.
 
As a result, many Iranian Azeris, wh0 estimates suggest may comprise up to a quarter or even a third of Iran’s population, have been demonstrating against Iran’s support for Armenia, chanting “Death to Armenia” at rallies and expressing solidarity with Azerbaijan’s situation.
 
“Israel’s close cooperation with Azerbaijan seems to be building appreciation domestically in Iran itself for Israel,” said Shaffer. “Accordingly, many ethnic Azerbaijanis in Iran are writing on social-media positive posts on Israel’s support for Azerbaijan.”