Study tour of Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh

PRESS RELEASE
General Assembly Mission Council
Mission Communications
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)
Susan E. Lindsey, APR, Senior Communications Associate
100 Witherspoon St., #5608
Louisville, KY 40202-1396
(502) 569-5060
Cell (502) 287-2268

Discover an old country
Study tour explores Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh

LOUISVILLE, Ky. (March 18, 2010) – Applications to participate in a
study tour of Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh are now being accepted by
the Jinishian Memorial Foundation<;, a
ministry of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) to the people of Armenia.
The study tour is June 13-24 and will offer participants the opportunity to:

* Learn about Armenian history, culture and politics
* Participate in excursions to historical and cultural sites
* Experience rural life and visit Armenian families
* Learn about the global economy and existing socio-economic problems
in Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh
* Meet with Orthodox, Catholic and Evangelical Church leaders who support
the foundation’s work for social change
* Discover ways to become involved in making positive social change
Participants in the study tour will meet with farmers using Jinishian
Foundation micro-credit loans to expand their agricultural production,
and meet students participating in Armenia’s first high school debate
clubs – initiated by the foundation to engage students in civil
society. Along the way, the tour will also visit ancient churches,
historical sites, and the Vernissage, Armenia’s largest open air
marketplace.
Applications are due April 15, and are available at
, or by contacting Sara Todd, program manager,
at 1-800-728-7228, ext. 5291.
The Jinishian Memorial Foundation was established in 1966 to enable
Armenians in need to move from poverty and despair to self-sufficiency
and hope through relief, development and spiritual uplift.
The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)<; comprises more
than 2 million members in more than 10,000 congregations, answering
Christ’s call to mission and ministry throughout the United States and
the world.
# # #

http://www.jinishian.org/&gt
http://www.jinishian.org
http://www.pcusa.org/&gt

BAKU: Russian Analyst: Armenians May Start To Behave Poorly With Res

RUSSIAN ANALYST: ARMENIANS MAY START TO BEHAVE POORLY WITH RESPECT TO RUSSIA
H. Hamidov

Today
4179.html
March 16 2010
Azerbaijan

Day.Az interview with the professor, director of the Center for
Conservative Studies under the Moscow State University Sociology
Department, leader of the International Eurasian Movement and political
expert Alexander Dugin.

How do you assess the recent moves by U.S. Congress House Committee on
Foreign Relations and the Parliament of Sweden to adopt the resolution
on the so-called "Armenian Genocide" ?

First of all, I want to say that "genocide", if it really took place,
was a hundred years ago. Armenians suffered greatly because of their
pro-Russian geopolitical views. In this case, Armenians themselves
and Russians should show empathy with what happened at that time. But
now let’s see when and by whom this "genocide" was recognized. First,
the U.S. Congress Committee adopted a resolution. Later the Swedish
Parliament adopted the same decision. The Swedish parliament
recognized the "genocide" so that Americans will not be alone in
current situation.

Do you mean the Swedish parliament took this move under the
U.S. pressure?

I am sure of this. Swedish have significant historical or geopolitical
relations neither with Armenians nor Turks, Azerbaijanis and Americans.

Then why it happened precisely at this time?

It is because relations between Turkey and the United States have
spoiled lately. Throughout the 1990s and 2000s their relations
gradually cooled, and now the situation is on the verge of Turkey’s
withdrawal from NATO and reluctance to continue to integrate into
the EU. Minister of Foreign Affairs of Turkey Ahmet Davutoglu said
that it would be nice for his country to join the Eurasian alliance
with Iran, Russia and China.

Moreover, Turkey is rapidly moving closer to Russia.

Turkey’s is against Iraq adventure of the United States which threatens
to ruin Turkey itself, because Americans do not hide their sympathy
for Kurdish separatism. Thus, Turkey, in fact, comes from the zone
of U.S. influence on all fronts.

And we have already witnessed how local government has arrested
powerful Turkish military, who support withdrawal from NATO and oppose
the U.S. on trumped-up charges of "Ergenekon" at the insistence of
the United States. Meanwhile, the Government comes to understanding
that that it should withdraw from NATO. America understands this,
and it has recognized the "genocide" only at the level of the Congress
Committee so as to try to put pressure on Turkey.

Will this situation somehow affect the resolution of the Karabakh
conflict?

Recently, former Armenian Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian said that
the current situation will lead to war over Karabakh between Russia
and Turkey. This is nonsense! Yes, Americans want the conflict over
Karabakh to break out partly trying to push Armenia and Azerbaijan
to this. However, both Russia and Turkey will do everything to ensure
that conflict does not happen. Therefore, they act in solidarity.

Throughout history of development of bilateral relations, such a
rapprochement took place at a time when Ataturk was in power. Moscow
has very good relations both with Armenia and Azerbaijan. Turkey also
has very good relations with Azerbaijan, and they are trying to improve
relations with Armenia. And if we all work together, we can neutralize
efforts of Americans to escalate the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh.

Meanwhile, the Americans are trying to act mainly through Armenia.

They put pressure on Armenia to raise the issue of recognition of
Nagorno-Karabakh as an independent state. However, they do not realize
that it is impossible for several reasons. Suppose that tomorrow the
international community will recognize Karabakh as an independent
state. In this case the international community will demand return of
Azerbaijanis there. This is human rights standards. We are all aware
that return of refugees in this case will result in a conflict, of
course. So, those persons in Armenia who are trying to rock the boat
of Karabakh are not Armenia’s friends. They act in the interests of
the U.S. against their Armenians.

So, on one hand, the United States supports Azerbaijan’s initiative
to return Karabakh through all possible ways and, on the other hand,
is pushing Armenians to consolidate efforts aimed at recognition of
Karabakh as an independent state. Everything is done with one purpose –
to escalate tension in the region.

In your opinion, is the opening the Armenian-Turkish border seem
possible under current situation?

I did not believe in opening of the borders even before these events
happened. The initiative was put forward by the U.S. to show how
Armenia is able to solve all its problems along with the United
States without Russia. In my opinion, it was clear anti-Russia
action. No more.

Of course, adoption of the resolution on "genocide" also causes a
danger for the Armenian-Russian relations. Being happy at so-called
"success", Armenians may start to behave poorly with respect to
Russia. Thus, the U.S. pushes Russia to the side of Turkey and
Azerbaijan. Moscow, however, will still try to maintain smooth
relations because Armenia is closely linked with Russia.

http://www.today.az/news/politics/6

BAKU: Turkish Deputies Demand Deportation Of Armenian Citizens

TURKISH DEPUTIES DEMAND DEPORTATION OF ARMENIAN CITIZENS

News.az
March 16 2010
Azerbaijan

"Turkey is not a country that can be spoken with in a language of
pressure."

The Turkish parliamentary commission on foreign relations listened to
Turkish FM Ahmed Davutoglu and Turkish ambassadors in the United States
and Sweden Namik Tan and Zergun Koruturk about the recognition of the
so-called "Armenian genocide" by the parliaments of some countries
on March 15.

During the debates, the deputies demanded from the government to show
a stiffer response to such resolutions. They urged to deport Armenian
citizens illegally residing in Turkey and close the US military base
in Incirlik.

"Turkey has granted Armenians the right to live illegally as it
understands that the situation in Armenia is grave. In addition,
if we take this step, what will the West think about us? Western
mass media will immediately start a campaign against Turkey saying
Ankara is deporting Armenians. This would place us in a very difficult
situation", Davutoglu said.

As for the signed protocols, he noted that Ankara does not intend to
withdraw them from the parliament: "Everything is good in its time. We
should not take the decisions that may further harm our interests. But
we will protect our national interests more energetically and let
everyone know about it. Turkey is not a country that can be spoken
with in a language of pressure. We will use these protocols as a tool",
Sabah newspaper quotes him as saying.

Davutoglu also stressed the need to take into account the further
possibility of such development and raise influence on the parliaments
of other countries.

"One Nation, One Culture" Pan-Armenian Festival Kicks Off

"ONE NATION, ONE CULTURE" PAN-ARMENIAN FESTIVAL KICKS OFF
Lusine Vasilyan

"Radiolur"
15.03.2010 15:32

Armenian Minister of Diaspora Hranush Hakobyan announced the start
of the "One nation, one culture" festival today.

The Government has already confirmed the program of the pan-Armenian
festival, and the Minister of Diaspora presented some details of the
events scheduled.

The fourth festival will be held under the high aegis of the President
of the Republic of Armenia. Unlike the previous years, the events
will take place throughout the year.

Thousands of guests are expected to arrive in Armenia within the
framework of the festival. Four hundred applications have already
been received from 11 countries.

Reopening border with Russia "hasty" decision – Georgian expert

Rezonansi, Tbilisi, Georgia
March 4 2010

Reopening border with Russia "hasty" decision – Georgian expert

Georgian expert in Caucasus issues Mamuka Areshidze has said that
reopening the Larsi checkpoint at the Georgian-Russian border was a
"hasty" decision. Speaking about the socio-economic situation in the
bordering Qazbegi District, he noted that hardship in the district
might trigger all sorts of threats. The expert emphasized Russia’s
plans to "occupy" Georgia’s mountainous areas before re-establishing
diplomatic relations between the two countries. He said that the
"occupation" had started with Abkhazia, South Ossetia and other
mountainous areas and therefore the Georgian authorities should have
thought of the socio-economic development of the district before
taking the decision. The following is the text of Nino Prangishvili’s
interview with Mamuka Areshidze, in the private high circulation daily
Georgian newspaper Rezonansi on 4 March headlined "Three reasons why
Larsi checkpoint should not have been opened"; subheadings inserted
editorially:

Why did the reopening of the Larsi checkpoint [between Russia and
Georgia] cause dissatisfaction among certain circles of [Georgian]
society? What threats might this opening pose to the territorial
integrity of Georgia? What do experts say? These are the questions
Rezonansi discussed with Mamuka Areshidze, expert in Caucasus issues.

[Areshidze] I am not saying that the border should not have been
opened. I think it should have been done, but not in this situation.
At present, the Georgian state is not ready for opening the border in
this way or in this situation. I think that, unfortunately, this
decision was a hasty one similarly to many others. What I mean is that
first of all, all the risks that the opening of the border might bring
should have been eliminated. The socio-economic rehabilitation of
Qazbegi District should have taken place along with the resolution of
some related issues.

[Rezonansi] Could you specify the issues please?

Threat one: organization Daryal

[Areshidze] The first and foremost reason why I think Georgia is not
ready for reopening the border is Daryal, the organization, which was
established in North Ossetia long ago. Their main demand is joining
Qazbegi District to North Ossetia. The organization comprises former
residents of Qazbegi District.

It is obvious that the organization was not established at the
initiative of the residents of Truso and Kobi areas of Qazbegi
District as the organization is backed up by a serious political
force, though of a regional scale. I mean the North Ossetian
government. On 30 December, the deputy Speaker of the North Ossetian
parliament, several committee chairmen and MP Arsen Padzayev
participated in the organization’s meeting, where the issue of joining
Qazbegi District to North Ossetia was raised.

Surely, somebody in Tbilisi might say that some statement made by some
organization does not really matter. At first sight, it might really
look unimportant. But I am very well aware of the processes taking
place parallel to these. We know that former Qazbegi District
residents were forced to become organization members.

Besides, although the organization was founded in 2008, for the North
Ossetian press controlled by Arsen Padzayev it had been common to
discuss the question of who Qazbegi District belongs to. In this way
the process of public opinion preparation and that of mobilizing the
people was started. To my mind, these people are used as disguise by
the North Ossetian political elite, which in turn is controlled by
Moscow, of course. As a result, the issue becomes dangerous. So it is
a risky issue.

Now, imagine a virtual reality in which former residents of Qazbegi
District go back. Their majority are citizens of Russia as well as
citizens of Georgia. That is why it is unlawful to stop them from
returning to Georgia.

Let us assume that they return to Georgia and see their houses and the
condition they are in: most of them have been burgled. This might
trigger excesses. Later, they might hold a rally in the centre of
Qazbegi District. Then they might ask Russia for help. And according
to Russian legislation, the country will defend its citizens all over
the world not to mention bordering areas. Something like this might
happen.

That is why they should not have opened the border. I do not mean that
ethnic Ossetians should not be allowed to return. On the contrary,
they should by all means be allowed to return and provided [support]
as they are our citizens. But before their return, the question of
their homes should have been solved.

That is why, I think that the Georgian state was not ready for opening
the Larsi checkpoint.

Threat two: possible provocations

The next issue is the threat of provocations. Why was the [Georgian
Military] Highway opened? By doing so we made concessions to Armenia.
Great. One should make concessions to neighbours, especially when this
is politically beneficial – the more Armenia is involved in the
Georgian land transit functions the better for us: the fewer problems
we will have in Javakheti [bordering with Armenia]. However, I believe
Armenia is not the only interested party. I think that Russia is very
interested too.

[Rezonansi] What is Russia’s interest?

[Areshidze] Provisioning of the bases in Armenia, particularly in the
town of Gyumri, is very expensive for Russia as it is done by air. It
is necessary for Russia to make provisioning cheaper and have a
transit corridor. Russia will not necessarily transport weapons via
the corridor. Our road will be used for supplying food, medicine and
so forth.

On the one hand, we [help] supply the military bases of the country
with which we are almost at war. This is complete nonsense. Moreover,
we should not rule out a possibility of cargo being attacked in
Qazbegi District resulting in the killing of drivers or people in the
[transit] service. If anything of the kind happens, Russia will surely
react to it. Consequently, this is another threat for which our
country is not ready because we failed to clarify what kind of goods
will be transported via the highway.

Threat three: hardships in Qazbegi

The third factor is the hard socio-economic situation in Qazbegi
District, which is not of lesser importance. In fact, the district is
left alone. At present, the population there is 1,500 people, of whom
many are citizens of Russia or are getting pensions from Russia. Given
the hardship, it will not be difficult for an enemy to find
dissatisfied people there.

Instead of working out a law on developing the mountainous areas of
Qazbegi or other places, and working out a socio-economic programme,
they did nothing. The country did not get prepared for opening the
border in connection with this either. So we have a weak link there.

When a survey was held, half of the population supported opening of
the border. The other half was against. Some of those who supported
the idea said that they had jobs and depended on the authorities to a
certain degree and could not say no to the border opening.

[Rezonansi] So you think that in Qazbegi District, we should expect
new provocations from Russia, and the opening of the border will only
increase the risk.

Russia planning to occupy mountainous Georgia

[Areshidze] I know what Russia’s intentions in Georgia are. It is
planning to occupy the mountainous areas along the Georgian border
before restarting diplomatic relations, before the world is able to
see it. The occupation process has already started – Abkhazia, South
Ossetia, and part of Tushetia have already been occupied. In Racha,
our frontier guards made their frontier guards retreat, and now they
are focusing on Qazbegi District. Qazbegi is a key factor. It is a
neck and means to control the Georgian Military Highway. This is
Russia’s plan. And that is why the Georgian authorities should have
thought a lot before taking the decision.

I think that the state border cannot be permanently blocked. But we
should think of the results too.

[translated from Georgian]

Suede: le Parlement reconnait le genocide armenien de 1915

Le Matin, Suisse
11 Mars 2010

Suède: le Parlement reconnaît le génocide arménien de 1915

Un jeune homme tient le drapeau arménien lors d’une manifestation le
14 décembre 2007 à Bruxelles pour demander la reconnaissance par
l’Union européenne du génocide de 1915.

Le Parlement suédois a adopté jeudi, contre l’avis du gouvernement,
une motion reconnaissant le génocide arménien de 1915, ont annoncé les
services parlementaires.
AFP – le 11 mars 2010, 20h42

Le texte, déposé par l’opposition de gauche et adopté avec une
majorité d’une seule voix, "signifie que la Suède reconnaît le
génocide de 1915 contre les Arméniens, les Assyriens, Syriens et
Chaldéens et les Grecs pontiques", indique le Parlement dans un
communiqué.

Quatre députés de la majorité de centre-droit ont désobéi à la
consigne de leurs partis et ont voté en faveur de la motion,
permettant son adoption surprise.

Le ministre suédois des Affaires étrangères Carl Bildt a immédiatement
annoncé que la ligne de son gouvernement, qui soutient la candidature
d’adhésion de la Turquie à l’Union européenne, "restait inchangée".

"Nous pensons que c’est une erreur de politiser l’histoire", écrit-il
sur son blog depuis Copenhague où il participe à une réunion des chefs
de la diplomatie des pays nordiques.

"La décision du Parlement ne va malheureusement pas faciliter le
processus de normalisation en cours entre la Turquie et l’Arménie, ni
le travail d’une commission qui doit enquêter sur les événements de
1915", estime M. Bildt.

"La décision ne va pas non plus faciliter le débat en Turquie qui est
devenue toujours plus ouverte et tolérante dans son rapprochement avec
l’UE et les réformes démocratiques que cela implique", poursuit le
ministre.

Le 4 mars, une commission du Congrès américain a reconnu le génocide
des Arméniens commis sous l’Empire ottoman, ignorant les mises en
garde de la secrétaire d’Etat Hillary Clinton et d’Ankara qui a
immédiatement rappelé son ambassadeur en poste à Washington.

Les massacres et déportations d’Arméniens entre 1915 et 1917 dans
l’Empire ottoman ont fait plus de 1,5 million de morts selon les
Arméniens, 250.000 à 500.000 selon la Turquie qui récuse la notion de
"génocide" reconnue notamment par Paris, Ottawa et le Parlement
européen.

La Turquie reconnaît aujourd’hui que des massacres ont été commis et
que de nombreux Arméniens sont morts en déportation. Mais elle fait
valoir qu’il s’agissait d’une répression contre une population
coupable de collaboration avec l’ennemi russe pendant la Première
guerre mondiale, et que des dizaines de milliers de Turcs ont été tués
par les Arméniens.

h-info/monde/suede-parlement-reconnait-genocide-ar menien-1915

http://www.lematin.ch/flas

ANKARA: Reassessing The Genocide Resolution

REASSESSING THE GENOCIDE RESOLUTION
Alon Ben Meir

Journal of Turkish Weekly
March 11 2010

Once again, as has happened every spring for years running, the debate
over whether the ethnic clashes against the Armenians in the break
up of the Ottoman Empire amounted to genocide has made it into the
US political arena for Congress to weigh in. The recent resolution
adopted by the House Committee on Foreign Affairs-to officially
recognize actions against the Armenians in 1915 as genocide committed
by the Ottoman Turks-has less to do with the US government’s pursuit
of historical accuracy, than political theater that has come at a
strikingly inopportune time.

Genocide is a serious label, and requires not only moral authority from
those who use it but a deep comprehension of the historical context
in which these events occurred. Armenians have every right to demand
official inquiries about the terms and conditions in which hundreds of
thousands of their ancestors were killed, but this is not the task of
US Congress, who has neither the moral standing to codify armed clashes
of a century ago without proper inquiry nor the right to be selective
about human rights offenses for political points. Every effort should
be made by President Obama and the remaining House Representatives
to prevent the resolution from reaching the House floor.

Beyond the very serious damage that such a resolution could inflict
on US-Turkish relations, should it pass the full House, congressional
interference at this juncture could severely erode the very moral
argument used justify the resolution. Turkey and Armenia have only
recently concluded two protocols calling for closer ties, open borders,
and most importantly, the creation of a commission to examine the
historical evidence of the tragic events. Not only will this vote
undermine the reconciliation process between Turkey and Armenia, but it
threatens the US-Turkish relationship at a time when Turkey is playing
a critical role aiding the US and the Middle East peace process.

Sadly, this resolution was politicized at the outset, thereby
diminishing much of its moral tenet. Had the purpose been for the US to
champion human rights and officially condemn any large scale atrocities
in times of war, then why was there no debate about massacres in Sudan,
Rwanda, Algeria or the Balkans? The fact that it was supported by a
powerful lobby and sponsored by many members of Congress, including
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the Committee Chairman Howard Berman from
California, and Donald Payne and Albio Sires from New Jersey, each of
whom represent relatively large Armenian constituencies, takes this
debate out of the moral realm and into the political one. Beyond this
matter, Howard Berman and the Foreign Relations Committee failed to
address the pressing issues behind what such a resolution would invite
forth, mainly the land disputes between Armenia and Azerbaijan and the
issue of reparations for descendants of the victims, none of which can
be treated in isolation. However large the political benefit these
members of Congress may garner this election year by pushing this
resolution, it is not in US interests, as the end result will hurt
the Turkish-Armenian reconciliation process and severely undercut
Turkish-US cooperation should it come to fruition. Such a serious
resolution requires the application of the highest moral review and
investigation, not a politically convenient act which is considered
an insult to Turkish identity. If genocide was in fact committed,
it should be left to an international investigative tribunal, not
politicians who need to be reelected every two years.

Turkey has been a loyal friend of the United States for more than
a half century, and continues to support American efforts in Iraq,
Afghanistan and the Arab-Israeli peace process. It is a modern
secular democracy, and has made great strides in remaining open
and progressive. Why then should the United States Congress hold
the descendants of the Ottomans responsible for the deeds of their
fathers perpetrated a century ago? Since Turkey vehemently rejects the
term genocide, what judgment should then be passed, and by whom, that
will not tarnish the present generation of Turks? This generation had
nothing to do with past events and, in fact, condemns the atrocities
committed during that heinous war, regardless of who the perpetrators
were. What then gives the United States’ House of Representatives
the moral authority to pass judgment, when domestic political
interest shamelessly dominates their motives? The argument against
the resolution by the full House should be based on moral grounds,
and the members must not act as judges and jurors when Turkey and
Armenia have agreed to establish their own joint committee to unravel
what in fact happened.

At a time when America still suffers from a lagging global image after
years of hawkish foreign policy and two ongoing wars, the United
States Congress must support what Turkey and Armenia have agreed
to do to resolve their conflict and help facilitate a resolution to
the Nagorno-Karabakh territorial dispute. Even the Jewish lobby, in
the wake of a series of diplomatic rifts between Turkey and Israel,
acted quietly in favor of the Turks, resulting in a close margin in
the vote. As much as Prime Minister Erdogan’s recent statements have
not fared well with the Israeli public, the Israeli diaspora is keen
on maintaining the strategic nature of its relationship with Turkey
as well as Turkey’s relationship with the West.

But more importantly, the Turkish government who acted out fervently
against the US government following the resolution must come to grips
with the separation of power in the United States. Both President
Obama and Secretary Clinton have come out strongly against the
resolution-albeit last minute-yet they cannot control the votes or the
agenda of Congress. Under no circumstance should Prime Minister Erdogan
cancel his upcoming visit to the US, as he should use this opportunity
to present his case and prove that Turkey is capable of handling the
disputes with Armenia without US congressional intervention.

It is by no means certain that this misguided resolution taken by
Pelosi and Berman will pass in the full House should it come to a
vote. Furthermore, it is unlikely these sponsors will even bring the
resolution to the floor unless they are certain it has a substantial
chance to pass. This represents a keen opportunity for Democrats
and Republicans alike to find a common area of interest and work in
unison for the best interests of the US, Turkey, and the future of
Turkish-Armenian relations.

Armenia Takes Part In Biggest World Tourist Exhibition ITB-2010 In B

ARMENIA TAKES PART IN BIGGEST WORLD TOURIST EXHIBITION ITB-2010 IN BERLIN

ArmInfo
2010-03-12 13:37:00

ArmInfo. Armenia is taking part in the 44th international tourist
exhibition ITB – 2010 in Berlin. The exhibition is held on March 10-14.

Armenia’s participation in the exhibition this year is assured by the
National Competitiveness Foundation of Armenia within the frames of
the tourism development programme, the Foundation told ArmInfo.

The Armenian tourist industry at ITB-2010 is represented by 12 local
tourist companies, in particular, Levon Travel, Saberatur Sevan,
Armenia Travel+M, Armen Tour, Armintour, Arminius, Elitar Travel,
ABP Tour, Nueva Vista, Geographic Travel and Vis- a-vis Tour. Nagorno
Karabakh has also been represented at the exhibition by a separate
pavilion.

Over 11,000 exhibition pavilions from 187 countries of the world will
present novelties in tourism and traveling at the exhibition. The
exhibition organizers expect about 200,000 professional and private
visitors.

AGBU Europe Congratulates Swedish Parliament On Acknowledging Armeni

AGBU EUROPE CONGRATULATES SWEDISH PARLIAMENT ON ACKNOWLEDGING ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

PanARMENIAN.Net
12.03.2010 20:40 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ AGBU Europe issued congratulatory address to the
Parliament of Sweden for acknowledging the genocides committed against
the Armenians, Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and Pontic Greeks during
the First World War.

The Parliament of Sweden adopted the resolution by a vote of 131 to
130 on Thursday 11 March. In response, Turkey withdrew its Ambassador
and cancelled Prime Minister Erdogan’s scheduled visit.

"Sweden often strives to reconcile effectiveness and ethics in
its relations with the world. We applaud it for its principled and
constructive stance on the Genocide. The truth will set us all free."

said Nicolas Tavitian, of AGBU Europe.

This vote comes on the heels of another vote, last Thursday (March 4),
in the U.S. Senate Foreign Affairs Committee, which also acknowledged
the Armenian Genocide. The resolution passed in spite of heavy pressure
from Turkey; the Turkish government recalled their ambassador to the
United States.

Opponents to the resolution in the US most often justified their
stance on the basis of Turkey’s strategic importance to the United
States. They also argue that Turkey may now refuse to open its border
with Armenia.

AGBU Europe believes it is a mistake on the part of European countries
or of the U.S. to yield to the demands of a fellow NATO member,
EU candidate country and self-declared friend to conceal the truth.

Turkey signed two protocols with Armenia on October 10, 2009 that were
intended to lead to the normalization of relations between the two
countries after a 17-year blockade (1993-2010) of Armenia by Turkey.

The country then reneged on its commitment and subjected ratification
of the agreement to further conditions. The process is widely
considered blocked in the Turkish Grand National Assembly. The
recognition of the Genocide in Sweden and the United States is a
useful signal to Turkey that it needs to radically rethink its policy
towards the Republic of Armenia and towards Armenians generally and to
urgently complete the normalization process, the statement concluded.

Spanish Parliament To Consider Armenian Genocide Resolution

SPANISH PARLIAMENT TO CONSIDER ARMENIAN GENOCIDE RESOLUTION

news.am
March 11 2010
Armenia

The motion on Resolution on Armenian Genocide was introduced to
Spanish Parliament. The sponsors of the document are representatives
of Republican Left of Catalonia and three MPs of Initiative for
Catalonia Greens.

They also proposed to include in the resolution a provision that
Spanish Government supports Armenia-Turkey normalization process and
calls EU to back Yerevan-Ankara dialogue.

February 26, the Catalonian Parliament, unanimously voted for the
Armenian Genocide approval.