Erdogan qualifie de "parodie" la resolution americaine

Libération, France
6 Mars 2010

Erdogan qualifie de «parodie» la résolution américaine sur le
«génocide» arménien

Le Premier ministre turc Recep Tayyip Erdogan a qualifié samedi de
«parodie» la résolution d’une commission du Congrès américain sur le
«génocide» arménien, estimant qu’elle affecterait tous les pays
concernés.

Le vote américain est le résultat de «politiques erronées», a jugé
Recep Tayyip Erdogan devant un groupe d’hommes d’affaires, selon la
télévision turque. «La Turquie ne sera pas entravée par une telle
comédie, une telle parodie, un tel fait accompli», a-t-il assuré.

«Laissez-moi vous dire très clairement que cette résolution ne nous
affectera pas. Mais elle endommagera les relations bilatérales entre
les pays, leurs intérêts et leur vision pour l’avenir. Nous ne serons
pas les perdants» a ajouté le Premier ministre turc.

La Turquie a demandé vendredi à Washington de bloquer la résolution
qualifiant de «génocide» les massacres d’Arméniens sous l’Empire
ottoman, votée jeudi par une commission du Congrès américain,
avertissant que le texte allait nuire aux efforts turcs de
réconciliation avec l’Arménie. Ankara a rappelé son ambassadeur Ã
Washington.

Le texte américain, qui n’a pas force de loi, appelle le président
Barack Obama à «qualifier de façon précise l’extermination
systématique et délibérée de 1.500.000 Arméniens, de génocide». Les
Arméniens qualifient de «génocide» les massacres et déportations qui,
entre 1915 et 1917, ont fait, selon eux, plus d’un million et demi de
morts au sein de leur communauté.

La Turquie reconnaît qu’entre 300.000 et 500.000 personnes ont péri,
non pas victimes d’une campagne d’extermination mais, selon elle, dans
le chaos des dernières années de l’Empire ottoman. La notion de
génocide a été reconnue par la France, le Canada et le Parlement
européen.

http://www.liberat ion.fr/monde/0101623030-erdogan-qualifie-de-parodi e-la-resolution-americaine-sur-le-genocide-armenie n

FM: Upper Lars has shown that Armenia may be a good mediator

Edward Nalbandyan: Upper Lars has shown that Armenia may be a good mediator

2010-03-06 12:32:00

ArmInfo. I do not exaggerate Armenia’s capacities not the least bit,
however, our country may be a good mediator, that is proved by quite
successful negotiations held in Armenia on opening of the Upper Lars
checkpoint Foreign Minister of Armenia Edward Nalbandyan said in an
interview with Public TV of Armenia on March 5.

"Upper Lars is opened, and today we can mark it as a great success for
both Russia and Georgia, as well as for Armenia. We have always
strived to more deepen our strategic relations with Russia and extend
our friendly relations with the USA, EU and our neighbours – Iran and
Georgia. These relations proceed from our interests, and we are
interested in steady advance in this direction", Nalbandyan said.

To recall, Upper Lars-Kazbegi checkpoint on the border of Georgia and
Russia was reopened on March 1, 2010.

Fatullaev’s Karabakh Diary (fragment)

Fatullaev’s Karabakh Diary (fragment)

KHOJALY: The chronicle of unseen forgery and falsification
ml

"THEY MANAGED TO EVACUATE THE CATTLE, BUT NOT THE PEOPLE’

Seeing Khojaly I couldn’t conceal my consternation. Having been
destroyed to the ground, this Azerbaijani settlement is completely
restored, and transformed into a town Ivanovka in honor of Armenian
general having taken an active part in the occupation of Khojaly.

The Khojaly tragedy, the deep wounds in our souls inflicted by
Armenian expansionism on this long-suffering Azerbaijani land, run
all through my meetings in Askeran.

How is that? Isn’t there anything humane left in these people?

However, for the sake of justice I admit that several years ago I met
some Khojaly refugees who temporarily lived in Nafatalan and who
openly confessed that the day before the large scale attack of
Russian-Armenian contingent army on Khojaly, the town was encircled.
And several days before the attack, Armenians gave the inhabitants
warnings by loudspeakers about the planned operation and suggested
that the population abandon the settlement and break out the
encirclement by the humanitarian corridor, along the bank of the river
Kar-Kar. According to Khojaly inhabitants, they made use of that
corridor, and the Armenian soldiers being at this corridor, in fact,
didn’t open fire at them. Several soldiers from the NFA battalion, for
some reason, helped part of the Khojaly inhabitants out to the village
Nakhijevanik which at that time was under control of Askeran battalion
of Armenians. The rest of the population was straddled by artillery
fire at the foot of Aghdam region.

Being in Askeran, I listened to the assistant chief of the Askeran
local authorities Slavik Arushanyan and compared his recollections
with the words of Khojali inhabitants who were under fire from the
Azerbaijani side.

I asked S. Arushanyan to help me to show the corridor through which
the Khojaly inhabitants went out. Getting to know the geographical
surroundings, I can state with a full conviction that conjectures
about the absence of Armenian corridor are groundless. The corridor
indeed existed. Otherwise the Khojali inhabitants, completely
surrounded and isolated from the outer world, could never have
breached the rings and get out of the encirclement. However, getting
over the area at the river Kar-Kar, the line of the refugees divided
into groups and nobody knows why one part of the Khojali people made
their way to the direction of Nakhijevanik. It seems that battalions
of NFA strived not for the liberation of Khojaly inhabitants, but
longed for much blood on the way of A. Mutalibov’s overthrow.

As S. Arushanyan says: `Several days before the attack, your then
president A. Mutalibov gave a telephone call to Stepanakert and made a
request to Lazarian, our former president. He requested to provide
conditions for the people to leave the blockade Khojaly. In reply
Lazarian asked A. Mutalibov – why aren’t you interested in your
people’s destiny? The helicopters sent from Baku are loaded by the
cattle and not by people.’

Yes, they managed to evacuate the cattle, but not the people. Such are
the sad recollections about the first Karabakh war.

I asked the Askeran inhabitants: `I was told in Karabakh that
Azerbaijani live here. Is it true?’

`We can visit them right now’, answered S. Arushanyan to my surprise.
Indeed, in the very centre of Askeran, lives an Azerbaijani by name
Tofik Aliev. And the most interesting thing is that learning that I am
from Baku, he wasn’t embarrassed at all.

– I have lived here since 1960. We moved here from Ujar region. After
the beginning of the mass disturbances I moved to Azerbaijan and again
returned to Ujar. I couldn’t survive there.

– When did you return to Askeran?

– In 1991. True, at some moment they wanted to kill me.

Here S. Arushanyan interrupted our conversation: `I told the guys
then- why to kill him? What is he guilty of? Today there is no
difference for us what nationality Tofik is’.

Well, this story shocked me so much that, returning to Karabakh, I was
eager to share my impressions with readers. And how astonished I was
when the so-called minister of Foreign Affairs Mr. Mamedyarov
disproved my impressions and estimated them by a beloved word
`provocation’.

Eynulla Fatulaev (Baku)
Lachin-Shusha-Aghdam-Khankendi-Baku
Source: newspaper `Realniy Azerbaijan’

http://www.xocali.net/EN/realazer.ht

NKR: Eghishe Annual Awarding

Eghishe Annual Awarding

NKR Government Information and
Public Relations Department

March 05, 2010

Today, at the convoked regular sitting of the commission, winners of
2009 annual award of the Government prize after Yeghishe were handed
to winners.
Congratulating the prize winners in the name of the Government and
the Prime Minister, Suren Grigoryan, the Minister-Chief of the NKR
Government Staff noted that there is still a lot to be done in this
direction. Vardan Hakobyan, the Chairman of the Commission, the
Chairman of the NKR Writers’ Union also congratulated the winners and
expressed a wish that the works, so highly appreciated by the
Government, to be seen in the wide international scene.
According to nominations laureates were the following; Maxim
Hovhannisyan (literature "Feast of non gods"), Yuri Hovhannisyan (art
"Mashtots in Amaras" high relief), Sophie Ioannidis, Benik
Ghahramanyan (cinematography and TV films "Title at the end"), Melanya
Balayan (liberal arts "Armenian Aghvan church history").

The first Armenian church to be build in Abu Dhabi

The first Armenian church to be build in Abu Dhabi

07.03.2010 15:50 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ After leaving India, H.H. Catholicos Aram I spent
two days in the Gulf Region visiting the members of the Armenian
Diocese. The Prelate H.E. Archbishop Gorun Babian and members of the
National Council welcomed him at the airport in Dubai and accompanied
him during his stay.

In Dubai and Abu Dhabi, His Holiness met with the clergy and lay
leaders of both communities and greeted the members during a Vespers
Service in Abu Dhabi. In his address he invited the people to deepen
their faith in God and shape their lives according to the Gospel
values.

His Holiness also met with the Ambassadors of Lebanon and Armenia. The
highlight of his visit to the Gulf was the meeting with the Political
Authorities of Abu Dhabi, who informed His Holiness that in response
to an earlier request, the ruler of Abu Dhabi was offering a peace of
land 3000 square meters large to build a church and a community
center, Communication and Information Department reported.

The Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia is one of the two Catholicosates
of the Armenian Orthodox Church. Its jurisdiction extends over the
Armenian Communities in the Middle East, Europe and North and South
America. The Catholicosate, the administrative center of the church is
located in Antelias, Lebanon.

Obama against Armenian ‘genocide’ bill

RTE News, Ireland
March 6 2010

Obama against Armenian ‘genocide’ bill

Saturday, 6 March 2010 08:25

US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton has said the Obama administration
will do what it can do block further progress of a controversial bill
describing as genocide the killing by Turks of Armenians during WWI.

A US congressional committee narrowly approved the resolution on
Thursday, paving the way for a possible vote on Capitol Hill.

But Mrs Clinton said the administration would ‘work very hard’ to prevent this.

AdvertisementTurkey voiced strong protests after the vote and recalled
its ambassador from Washington for consultations.

The same congressional committee passed a similar resolution in 2007
but it failed to go anywhere after then-President George W Bush
weighed in strongly against it.

Muslim Turkey accepts that many Christian Armenians were killed by
Ottoman Turks but denies that up to 1.5m died and that it amounted to
genocide.

The committee’s resolution urges President Obama to use the term
genocide when he delivers his annual message on the Armenian massacres
in April.

He avoided using the term last year although as a presidential
candidate he said the killings were genocide.

Ronald Reagan was the only US president to publicly call the killings genocide.

.html

http://www.rte.ie/news/2010/0306/turkey

Sharmazanov: US Wanted to Show Turkey It Could `Tighten’ the Screws

Sharmazanov: U.S. Wanted to Show Turkey It Could Also `Tighten’ the Screws
2010/03/05 | 11:55

politics
Natasha Harutyunyan
ov-3/

Edward Sharmazanov, spokesman for the ruling Republican Party of
Armenia, today told Hetq that he welcomed yesterday’s vote by the U.S.
House Committee regarding HR 252 since it proves that the U.S. remains
true to the principles of democracy and human rights.

`I don’t believe that it’s mere coincidence that it passed at this
time and I believe that Turkey’s unconstructive approach to relations
had something to do with it as well. Remember that Turkey had recently
made some ultimatums directed at the U.S. By passing the resolution,
Washington wanted to show Turkey that it could also tighten the
screws,’ Mr. Sharmazanov told Hetq.

Mr. Sharmazanov said that it is clear that the U.S. is very interested
that the Protocols be ratified in their present form and that it
wanted to stress this point to Ankara.

Regarding the vociferous reaction by Turkey, Mr. Sharmazanov said the
reaction by Ankara had been even more vocal in the past and that it
was just another side of the diplomatic process.

`I believe that sooner or later Turkey will ratify the Protocols. If
not, Turkey will wind up in a very problematic situation. And it’s
just not about the Protocols. Turkey faces many much more serious
issues like the Kurdish issue, EU membership, Cyprus. Turkish reaction
is also directed at internal consumption. Erdogan’s party faces
elections in 2011 and its ratings have been dropping lately. Erdogan
wants to bolster his nationalist credentials,’ said Mr. Sharmazanov.

http://hetq.am/en/politics/e-sharmazan

Karabakh Squatters Cling On

Institute of War and Peace Reporting IWPR
March 5 2010

Karabakh Squatters Cling On

Date: 05 Mar 2010

Baku residents demand homes back but refugees refuse to budge.

By Leyla Leysan in Baku (CRS No. 534, 05-Feb-10)

Thousands of Baku residents are forced to live in difficult conditions
because refugees from Nagorny Karabakh have seized their homes and the
legal system has failed to help them.

The refugees were among hundreds of thousands of Azeris who fled
Karabakh when Armenians seized control of the territory and regions
bordering it in the early 1990s. Many refugees live in illegally held
accommodation but say they have nowhere else to go.

Now Azerbaijan’s authorities may finally be moving to expel them after
years of saying they would not do so until they were able to regain
control over Karabakh.

Tarana Kerimova, 38, struggled to put together the money to buy a flat
in a block being built as a cooperative in the 1990s but, before her
family could move in, a group of refugees from Karabakh took it over.

"The refugees removed the steel doors put there by the owners to try
to secure their living space. They have done a lot of damage to the
building," she said.

At first, she tried to reason with the squatters, but was verbally
abused, she said. Other dispossessed owners were even attacked. They
then went to the courts, but repeated rulings that the refugees should
move out have come to nothing.

Kerimova and about half the 70 families that saved up to pay for the
building are left renting rooms in crumbling hostels.

"We got to the point when we were asking them to give us just one
room, so we’d have somewhere to live but they refused. Some of the
owners were lucky; they moved in on time to protect their space, and
sit in an empty concrete flat, without waiting for fittings to be
installed," she said.

"Around 30 people are still waiting to get in. Among them are two with
cancer, as it happens. I have to rent a flat even though I am bringing
up my children on my own."

Sadaqat Ahmedova is another unlucky Baku resident who failed to move
into her new flat in time. She said people whose homes were stolen
live in dreadful conditions in hostels, in basements or in rented
flats.

"I live in a derelict house on the edge of the city. There is no
sewerage system, instead of floorboards there are railway sleepers.
The roof leaks all the time, which means everything is so damp that it
is unpleasant just to be there, let alone live. My son has asthma and
the conditions are harmful for him," she said.

"My father-in-law helped us buy this place, but he could not afford
anything more. When I gathered the money for the cooperative flat, I
sold everything I had. I managed to get together 15,000 US dollars,
and look, I am stuck in a ruined building. I have tried everything,
and asked people to come and look at our inhuman living conditions.
But there is no help. We don’t want money, we just want our homes."

Activists say refugees had little choice but to move into any
buildings they could find, and that in the vast majority of cases they
did not displace anyone.

"The government in the early 1990s did not have the capacity to house
the refugees. People looked for a roof over their heads themselves.
They settled in sanatoria, camps, kindergartens and hostels. Some
refugees settled in empty flats, whose owners had decided to wait out
the hard years abroad," said Kerim Kerimli, chairman of the Society of
Internally Displaced Persons.

"The country’s leadership was fairly lenient about this and announced
several times that until the occupied territories are liberated, the
forced migrants would not be touched," he added.

He said a lot of houses were now being built, and the authorities had
begun to behave differently. Refugees were being moved into new
accommodation in order of need, he said, with those in the worst
conditions at the top of the queue.

"After them will be those who had the choice ` to be on the street or
to take someone else’s empty flat," he said.

According to a presidential decree of 2004, refugees cannot be removed
from plots of land or administrative buildings that they occupied
between 1992 and 1998 unless they are provided with living space of an
equivalent standard.

That should not apply to the cooperative house of Ahmedova and
Kerimova ` and a court case from 1998 specifically ordered the
refugees to leave their flats ` but they remain homeless.

The court decision was reissued in May 2007, but the bailiffs did not
enforce it because the refugees appealed. The appeal court then said
the refugees could not be expelled until they could go home, and they
cannot go home until Azerbaijan reclaims control of Karabakh. This
means the residents’ fate is tied to that of territory, which has been
ruled by Armenians for 15 years.

Eldar Zeynalov, director of the Human Rights Centre of Azerbaijan,
said, "There is a court decision that the flats must be vacated. That
it has not been fulfilled for several years is a violation of the
human rights of the owners. As for a postponement until the liberation
of the occupied territories, this is not correct."

He said thousands of Baku residents have struggled with this problem
since the early 1990s.

Eldar Alizade, head of the pressure group Defence of the Rights of
Unfortunate and Homeless Baku Residents, said the deprived people had
to keep fighting.

"People have several times appealed to me with this same problem, and
some of them were even worse off. The refugees did not always take
over an empty flat. There were cases when someone would leave in the
morning, and in the evening would find different people in his home,
who would not only refuse to leave but would attack him," he said.

"The only advice for these people is to go to court and to take it to
the constitutional court, and after that appeal to the European court.
There is no doubt that the problem will be resolved at that level,
since the right to property is written into the European Convention
[on Human Rights]."

The European Court of Human Rights has twice ruled that Baku residents
had been illegally deprived of their property. In 2007, Valentina
Akimova won repossession of her flat along with 10,000 manats (12,500
dollars) of compensation after an Azerbaijan court had allowed the
refugees to remain in her flat until the occupied territories were
liberated.

Then, in February this year, Jafar Jafarov won a similar case, and
will probably be able to take back his flat in the next few months.
However, the homeless people are unlikely to take too much comfort
from these isolated cases.

In October 2006, a group of the residents visited Ali Hasanov, head of
the state committee for refugees’ affairs.

"Although I understand your problem well, it is not in my power to
solve it soon. I promise you that the first people moved into flats
built for refugees will be those who are occupying other people’s
flats," he told the group at the time.

Four years have passed, and once again Hasanov has promised their
problem will be resolved in the near future.

"At the moment around 6,000 refugees are living in illegally seized
flats, half of them in Baku," he said.

"We have taken six months to fully investigate the problem, and have
the addresses of all the houses, which will be vacated very soon. This
is around 300-400 buildings."

Leyla Leysan is a freelance journalist trained by IWPR.

Obama And Congress Serve Up The Baloney Over The Ottoman Empire’s 19

OBAMA AND CONGRESS SERVE UP THE BALONEY OVER THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE’S 1915 SLAUGHTER OF ARMENIANS
by John L. Work

David Horowitz’s NewsReal Blog
March 4 2010

"Hey, what happened to the baloney, man?" (From a Cheech and Chong
skit) It’s being sliced thick and served hot in D.C. There is a
debate raging through the Halls of Congress and a horde of lobbyists
scurrying about over what to call the 1915-16 extermination of 1.5
million Armenians by the Muslim Ottoman Turk government. The Armenians
want us to call it genocide. The jihadi Turks just want this thing
to go away, so they can get through the gates of The European Union
and move on to the final Muslim conquest of Vienna and the West.

During his 2008 campaign, President Obama promised to call out
the Turks for the "genocide". Now he’s singing a different tune
and telling us everyone needs to get over this thing by calling it
"atrocities". It’s all halal baloney, no matter how you slice it.

The Muslim Ottoman Empire systematically wiped out a huge segment
of its Armenian population during WWI. Call it genocide or call it
jihad. It was mass slaughter. Today’s Washington Post includes a
hand-wringing piece by Dan Eggen:

"Each year, Armenian Americans remember the massacres of hundreds of
thousands of men, women and children in the aftermath of World War I.

And each year, Congress becomes embroiled in a bitter debate between
Armenia and Turkey over whether to label the episode as genocide.

The dispute has set off a lobbying frenzy this year in the House
Foreign Affairs Committee. Chairman Howard L. Berman (D-Calif.) is
scheduled to hold a vote Thursday on a nonbinding resolution that calls
on President Obama to formally refer to the 1915 massacre as genocide
and to use the term during an annual address on the topic next month…

… A contingent of members of the Turkish parliament visited
Washington this week before the vote to meet with key lawmakers of
both parties, warning that approval of the genocide resolution would
hurt relations between the two countries, including cooperation with
the United States on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq…"

A little well-placed threat sometimes works wonders, now, doesn’t it.

Did I just read a threat there?

"…A similar vote in committee in 2007 led Turkey to recall its U.S.

ambassador and prompted a furious effort by the Bush administration
to scuttle a full House vote…"

By golly, that was a threat. I’m sure of it now.

There is documentary evidence that the slaughter of Armenians actually
happened, here. Oddly, Turkey has not responded to the evidence.

So, the D.C. baloney slicing continues as the jihad rolls on, the
OIC runs the U.N., and no one in the Halls of Power seems to have a
clue yet as to what is driving all this madness. The answers can be
found here, here, and here.

a-and-congress-serve-up-the-baloney-over-the-ottom an-empires-1915-slaughter-of-armenians/

http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/03/04/obam

US Congress House Foreign Affairs Committee Endorses Armenian Genoci

US CONGRESS HOUSE FOREIGN AFFAIRS COMMITTEE ENDORSES ARMENIAN GENOCIDE RESOLUTION

ArmInfo
2010-03-04 22:42:00

ArmInfo. US Congress House Foreign Affairs Committee has endorsed
Armenian Genocide resolution

Thus, by the motion, the US Congress House Foreign Affairs Committee
has affirmed of the United States Record on the Armenian Genocide
Resolution.

Howard L. Berman (D-CA), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs
Committee, announced today that it is his intention to mark up the
Armenian Genocide resolution (H. Res. 252) on March 4.

"All the facts prove it was a genocide", said Berman in his
introduction speech. Other members of the Committee pointed out
that the Armenian Genocide has been affirmed in the records of many
foreign countries, including also the US, Russia, Germany, and an
attempt to hold off the motion for some time in future is immoral and
unacceptable either to the memory of the sacrifice of this deadly event
in the Ottoman Empire and to its survivors. Moreover, the members of
the Committee have paralleled the events of 1915 with the massacre
of Jews during the World War 2. They emphasized that the Armenian
Genocide is the same crime against humanity as Holocaust.