Hanrapetutiun Party’s Leader: Time To Choose Between Bright and Free

HANRAPETUTIUN PARTY’S LEADER: TIME TO CHOOSE BETWEEN BRIGHT AND FREE
FUTURE AND MIDDLE AGES CAME

YEREVAN, MAY 30, NOYAN TAPAN. “Today a planned slaughter against
freedom and democracy is being carried out in Armenia,” Aram Sargsian,
Chairman of the Hanrapetutiun (Republic) party, declared on May 30 in
his greeting speech made at the opening of the Zharangutiun (Heritage)
party’s congress. In his estimation, time to choose between bright and
free future and the Middle Ages came. “There is no third way. Our party
chose struggle for establishment of freedom and justice.” Hovhannes
Hovhannisian, Leader of the Liberal-Progressive Party of Armenia,
declared that under the created home political and socio-economic
conditions time for Armenia and its people passes senselessly. He also
emphasized that because of the untalented policy of authorities the
country, practically, appeared in isolation. According to him, today
when the society is extremely disappointed at the policy of authorities
the people more and more connect their hopes and expectations with
the opposition that should do its best in order to justify them.

Villiers savoure son triomphe

Le Figaro
30 mai 2005

Villiers savoure son triomphe;
souverainistes Le président du MPF a, hier soir, demandé à Jacques
Chirac de démissionner ou de dissoudre l’Assemblée

Sophie Huet

Dès l’annonce de la victoire du non au référendum, Philippe de
Villiers a affirmé, hier soir sur TF1, que ce résultat représentait «
une crise politique majeure », que le chef de l’Etat devait «
dénouer, de deux manières, je lui en laisse le choix : soit par sa
démission, étant donné qu’il s’est quand même lourdement engagé, soit
par la dissolution de l’Assemblée nationale ». Le président du
Mouvement pour la France (MPF), qui est parti le premier en campagne
contre le traité européen, en septembre dernier, a prévenu qu’il
entendait « faire respecter la victoire du non ».

Seule ombre au tableau pour Philippe de Villiers : la Vendée, comme
la plupart des départements de l’Ouest, vote oui, à 50,2 % des voix.

La victoire du non au référendum, Villiers y croyait, certes, mais
jusqu’au bout, il aura douté. C’est lors du meeting du 21 mai, au
Palais des sports de Paris, qu’il s’est vraiment dit que la victoire
était possible. Ce jour-là, il a rassemblé plus de cinq mille
personnes pour le non, alors que Nicolas Sarkozy n’avait réuni que
quatre mille jeunes en faveur du oui, dix jours plus tôt. « Avec nos
petits moyens, on a fait mieux que l’UMP. C’est incroyable ! » se
réjouissait Guillaume Peltier, le directeur de campagne et numéro
deux du Mouvement pour la France (MPF).

Après des élections européennes de juin 2004 au goût amer (7 % des
voix et trois sièges seulement à Bruxelles pour le PMF, affaibli par
la concurrence, minime soit-elle, des listes Pasqua), le député
européen fait son grand retour sur la scène politique.

Après 110 déplacements pour le non et de nombreux duels audiovisuels,
Philippe de Villiers affirme que le MPF « a fait son passage en Ligue
1 » et « triplé le nombre de ses adhésions ».

Couronné par son succès à l’Audimat (9,2 millions de téléspectateurs,
le 23 mai, au JT de 20 heures sur TF 1), sacré chef de file du non à
droite par un sondage Ifop diffusé jeudi dernier sur LCI, qui indique
que Villiers sort le premier « renforcé » par la victoire du non,
l’intéressé considère que le rejet du traité par les Français est en
grande partie son succès personnel. « Le Pen a été évanescent, il a
fait sa sortie de piste », lâche-t-il.

De la petite boutique MPF, Villiers veut désormais faire un grand
parti « avec une expression politique puissante », face à l’UMP dont
il n’a cessé de critiquer « la volonté de monopole » depuis sa
création. « 95 % des parlementaires ont appelé à voter oui, or plus
de 50 % des Français ont voté non. Le Parlement n’est donc plus
représentatif », estime Villiers, favorable à l’instauration d’une
dose de proportionnelle aux législatives.

Tout au long d’une campagne sans faute, Villiers a rodé des thèmes
qui ont ensuite été repris par tous les partisans du non, de droite
comme de gauche : « Non à la Turquie », « non à la Constitution », «
non aux délocalisations ». Le 17 décembre, jour du Conseil européen
de Bruxelles, devant les grands magasins, à une semaine des fêtes de
Noël, Villiers sera encore le premier à dénoncer l’ouverture de
négociations d’adhésion avec Ankara. « Nous sommes tous des Arméniens
de France ! » lance-t-il, pour dénoncer le refus des autorités
turques de reconnaître le génocide arménien de 1915.

C’est encore Villiers qui déniche, et publie sur des milliers de
tracts, la photo du premier ministre turc, Recep Erdogan, signant
l’acte final du traité européen, le 29 octobre 2004, à Rome, « avec
le même stylo et la même encre que Jacques Chirac ».

C’est encore lui qui dé noncera le premier, à la fin 2004, les
dangers du projet de directive « Bolkestein-Frankenstein », qui a
incontestablement mobilisé les Français pour le non, en cette période
de crise économique et de grogne sociale.

Villiers n’a cessé d’affirmer qu’il défendait « un non de survie de
la France », « un non alter-européen », et que le non permettrait une
renégociation du traité. Ce qu’une majorité de Français pensent
aussi.

–Boundary_(ID_LbUGsG2L6rHgK1rg3GPo/w)–

Beirut residents vote in first election free of Syrian meddling toel

Beirut residents vote in first election free of Syrian meddling to elect Hariri’s son
ZEINA KARAM

AP Worldstream
May 30, 2005

Riding a sympathy vote, the son of slain former Prime Minister Rafik
Hariri appeared headed toward victory in parliamentary elections in
Beirut, the first in the country to be held largely free of Syrian
domination.

Voters turned out, albeit in small numbers, Sunday to pay tribute
to the leader whose February assassination triggered international
anger and street protests that ultimately drove the Syrian army out
of Lebanon.

The list led by Saad Hariri, the son of the assassinated former
premier, was celebrating victory Sunday night after incomplete results
showed it had swept Beirut’s 19 parliamentary seats.

Official results are not due until Monday, and voting in the rest of
the country is still to come.

But a government official, speaking on condition of anonymity,
confirmed the Saad Hariri campaign’s prediction, with most of the
votes counted and the ticket’s margin of votes insurmountable.

Many observers expect the polls, the first free of Syrian meddling
in 29 years, to sweep the anti-Syrian opposition to power and install
a new parliament, removing the last vestiges of Damascus’ control.

“This is the first time I voted in my life,” said 70-year-old Elaine
Antoun, smiling as she emerged from a polling station in Beirut’s
mainly Christian Ashrafiyeh district. “The past few months made me
feel there might be hope yet for this country.”

After polls closed, Interior Minister Hassan Sabei said unofficial
results showed voter turnout in Beirut was about 28 percent compared
with 35 percent in the 2000 parliamentary elections.

The weak turnout reflected public dissatisfaction amid calls for a
boycott, complaints that the ticket of Saad Hariri, a Sunni Muslim,
lacked representation of political factions, and lack of challengers
in some constituencies. Television stations reported that the boycott
was mainly in Christian parts of the city.

Hundreds of Hariri supporters danced and cheered outside the family’s
palatial residence in Beirut’s Koreitem neighborhood as returns tallied
by his campaign showed the Hariri slate winning Beirut’s 10 contested
seats. Fireworks lit the night sky as the Hariri family went to the
grave of the slain leader late Sunday to pray.

The Hariri list won the city’s other nine uncontested seats by default.

With 90 percent of the vote counted, Saad Hariri received over 35,000
ballots and was the biggest vote-getter in Beirut, his campaign said.

Sunday’s vote, which Sabei called “trouble-free,” was the first stage
of a four-part election. Other regions of Lebanon vote on the next
three Sundays.

There was one minor incident, when fistfights broke out late Sunday
between supporters of opposition leader Walid Jumblatt and rival
Najah Wakim.

The two sides threw bottles and rocks at each other before security
forces intervened and restored calm, witnesses said.

Stefane Dujarric, a spokesman for U.N. Secretary-General said Kofi
Annan was very encouraged byA theA democraticA conduct of the first
round of the Lebanese parliamentary elections and hoped the remaining
rounds would take place in the same peaceful atmosphere.

“These elections constitute a major opportunity for the Lebanese people
to shape their own future, to strengthen their political institutions
and to restore their full sovereignty,” he said.

Rafik Hariri’s widow, Nazek, led the voting, arriving within an hour
of polls opening at 7 a.m. (0400GMT) to cast her ballots. Polls closed
11 hours later.

“I have high hopes today that we will uncover the truth of who planned
and carried out the crime against my beloved husband, who in life
built this country and in his martyrdom achieved national unity,”
Nazek Hariri told reporters after voting.

The vote was watched closely by the United States and other outside
governments that pushed for a Syrian troop withdrawal and on-time
elections, despite a divisive election law.

Syrian forces withdrew in April after mass demonstrations in Lebanon
and relentless international pressure sparked by the February
assassination of the former premier. The Feb. 14 bombing also killed
20 others.

More than 100 observers from the European Union and the United
Nations watched the vote for irregularities, the first time Lebanon
has permitted foreign scrutiny.

“I see it as a potential for a new start,” U.S. Sen. Joseph Biden,
who came to watch the balloting, told The Associated Press.

The Delaware Democrat acknowledged that the new parliament may not be
fundamentally different from the previous one, but said the atmosphere
had improved because “there’s an occupying force that’s gone.”

In a statement issued by U.N. headquarters in Beirut, U.N. envoy Terje
Roed-Larsen said the elections “represent a significant step for the
Lebanese people in their quest for recovering their full political
independence and sovereignty.”

About 420,000 people were eligible to vote in Beirut. At stake were
19 of the legislature’s 128 seats, divided equally among Muslims
and Christians.

For some, elections free of Syrian influence provided a chance for
a new beginning.

“I am voting for the future,” said Yehia Arakji, a 62-year-old merchant
who voted for Hariri’s list in Beirut’s Muslim sector. “It is time
for the Lebanese to decide their own fate.”

Others expressed frustration with an election law that marginalized
many factions, and infighting that has splintered the opposition.

“I am doing my duty by voting, but I don’t have much hope,” said
Wardeh Hamad, 40. “The politicians wasted an opportunity, each went
his own way.”

Prime Minister Najib Mikati repeated Sunday the widely proclaimed
contention that the election law drawn up in 2000 during the Syrian
era was unfair, but said the elections were still “an important
achievement.”

Saad Hariri urged voters to go to the polls on his father’s behalf.

“We say to people go out and vote to show gratitude to that person
who sacrificed his blood and life,” he said.

Those calling for a boycott were mainly followers of Christian
opposition leader Michel Aoun, who is fielding his own candidates
elsewhere in the country. His supporters, wearing orange T-shirts,
stood outside polling stations distributing paper slips that read
“Boycott the appointments.”

The main Armenian political party, Tashnag, also urged supporters
to boycott.

Wakim criticized the Hariri ticket and what he called the power
of money.

“I wish we had a thousandth or a millionth of their money so we could
fight in all of Beirut,” he said.

Rafik Hariri _ who was prime minister for 10 of the last 15 years and
credited with rebuilding Lebanon from the destruction of the 1975-90
civil war _ was a billionaire businessman.

Azerbaijan sent a complaint note to Russia

AZERBAIJAN SENT A COMPLAINT NOTE TO RUSSIA

A1plus
| 13:08:18 | 30-05-2005 | Politics |

The Azeri authorities are in negotiations with official Tbilisi in
order not to allow the Russian military forces coming out of Georgia
to be transported to Armenia. According to the internet newspaper
day.az, the Azeri Ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary to
Georgia Ramiz Hasanov has said this.

He has said that Azerbaijan understands why Georgia strives for the
Russian military forces to be ousted from their country. At the same
time the Ambassador has hinted that Georgia must understand that it
is important for Azerbaijan where the technique is sent. “They must
not appear in Armenia, and we must be in constant negotiations with
Georgia”, said the Azeri Ambassador.

The Russian main headquarters General Yurij Baluevski announced some
days ago that the Russian military bases in Georgia will be transported
to Russia, but part of them will go to Armenia. In this connection
the Azeri Foreign Ministry has sent a complaint note to Russia.

Investigation of Nor Zhamanakner Party Claim vs Police Postponed

EXAMINATION OF NOR ZHAMANAKNER PARTY’S CLAIM AGAINST POLICE POSTPONED
FOR A WEEK

YEREVAN, MAY 26, NOYAN TAPAN. The first instance court of Kentron and
Nork-Marash Yerevan communities presided over by judge Hrachya
Hovhannisian will start to examine Nor Zhamanakner party’s claim
against RA Police on June 2. At the May 26 sitting the court sustained
the mediation of Hovhannes Kocharian, Deputy Head of Legal Provision
Department of RA Police, representing the respondent party about
giving time for obtaining additional proofs and the court sitting was
postponed for a week: the party mediated about giving a term of 10
days to it. In his claim Aram Karapetian, Chairman of the Nor
Zhamanakner party, appeals against the following formulations in the
May 21 report of RA Police placed on its Internet site: “Nor
Zhamanakner’s chairman started an unsanctioned rally in the square
near Sevan Chamber of Culture” and “organized an unsanctioned
procession from Sevan market to the square in front of the Chamber of
Culture voicing public appeals about participating in the revolution
being prepared in Armenia, changing the power by force.” According to
party’s chairman, the April 20 Sevan rally was sanctioned and no
unsanctioned rally and appeals about overthrow of power by force were
voiced. Besides, according to the claimant party, the respondent
violated the requirement of the second clause of Article 8 of the law
“On Mass Media,” it didn’t publish a refutation, and the
above-mentioned information discredits his and Nor Zhamanakner party’s
honor and dignity. So, the party asks to oblige the respondent party
to refute the May 21 report of RA Police.

BAKU: Azerbaijan in talks w/Georgia to prevent Russian Move to ROA

Today, Azerbaijan
May 28 2005

Azerbaijan in talks with Georgia to prevent replacement to Russian
arms to Armenia

28 May 2005 [17:28] – Today.Az

The Azerbaijani government authorities are in talks with Georgia to
prevent the replacement of part of the Russia property and armed
technique from Georgia to Armenia, Ramiz Hassanov, the Azerbaijani
Ambassador to Azerbaijan.

According to Hassanov, Azerbaijan well understands Georgia’s
interests in rapid withdrawal of Russian troops from its territory,
but heir dislocation represents great significance for Baku. “They
should not be delivered to Armenia. So, we are discussing he issue
with Georgian authorities.” he added. (Trend)

Hassanov noted they did not start withdrawing the heavy technique
from Georgia, they only replace the ammunitions.

Baluyevskiy has recently stated that the Russian armed bases will be
withdrawn from the territory of Georgia, while part of the arms will
be replaced to Armenia. Baluyevskiy noted that part of the armed
technique and military property of the bases will be disposed in
Armenia. “It will enable us to extend the term of withdrawal to 4
year,” he said.

The Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry has issued note to the Azerbaijani
Foreign Ministry in this connection.

URL:

http://www.today.az/news/politics/19467.html

Nalbandian Eases Into Last 16

French Open 2005
28 May 2005

NALBANDIAN EASES INTO LAST 16

David Nalbandian reached the fourth round of the French Open at Roland
Garros with a straight-sets win over Mario Antic.

The game had looked on course to remain unconcluded overnight but the
tenth-seeded Argentinian hurried through a victory, beating his
Croatian opponent 6-4 7-6 (7-4) 6-3.

Nalbandian will now face the unseeded Romanian Victor Hanescu for a
place in the quarter-finals.

In all likelihood the winner of that tie will face world number one
Roger Federer in the last eight.

The Armenian gambit

Agency WPS
What the Papers Say. Part A (Russia)
May 27, 2005, Friday

THE ARMENIAN GAMBIT

SOURCE: Rossiiskie Vesti, No. 17, May 19, 2005, p. 8

by Sergei Marsov, Yerevan, especially for Rossiiskiye Vesti

The name of fugitive Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky has been
promoted well enough in the former USSR. The tycoon is believed to be
linked to recent developments in Georgia and Ukraine, attempts to
overthrow Alexander Lukashenko in Belarus, and every imaginable
political plot against the Kremlin. And this is not without reason.
But very few could suppose that Boris Berezovsky would concern
himself with Armenia – more precisely, with relations between Baku
and Yerevan.

Media wars are always waged with reliable and tested techniques. At
first, some newspaper produces a “leak” concerning some event, citing
“our sources in authoritative government bodies.” Then the
information is taken up by political analysts with their usual “smart
explanation.” During the third phase, if the “leak” is has been
arranged properly, it becomes a big politics factor when certain
statements are made concerning operating politicians. If they are
aware of the process they are being involved in, it is one thing. But
it is different when the politicians try to satisfy the so-called
public opinion which has been formed by someone else. In this case
political complications are inevitable. If it comes to state leaders,
there will most likely spring up problems between states.

Something of that kind has recently occurred in the
Azerbaaijani-Armenian relations. The most sophisticated political
analysts were quick to name the “evil force” factor. The plot is as
follows. Originally, Armenian newspaper “168 Zham” spread information
that Armenian President Robert Kocharyan had recently gone to Georgia
in order to meet there with Boris Berezovsky. The reporters claimed
that the Armenian president had asked the fugitive oligarch to assist
him through the media he owned.

Simultaneously, Realny Azerbaijan newspaper published an interview
with Alexander Litvinenko, a former officer of Ukrainian security
agencies. Litvinenko declared that the bloody tragedy which happened
in the Armenian Parliament on October 27, 1999 when terrorists killed
the prime-minister, the speaker and other six senior government
officials had been scripted and organized by the Russian Main
Intelligence Administration (GRU). It was claimed that owing to these
measures “the Russian authorities managed to prevent signature of a
Karabakh conflict resolution agreement.”

Therefore, an interesting political combination is shaping up: an
attempt has been made to removed Russia from the Karabakh conflict
resolution by undermining Yerevan’s and Baku’s trust in it. It was
suggested that there are particular trust relationships between
Robert Kocharyan and Boris Berezovsky, which is supposed to bring
Yerevan and Moscow apart. There was also a broad hint at “bloc”
ambitions which Mikhail Saakashvili and Robert Kocharyan are believed
to have, which surely cannot but worry Baku. Taking into
consideration the recent statement of President George W. Bush in
Tbilisi in which he called Georgia “the outpost of democracy in the
whole region”, the propagandist scheme which Boris Berezovsky is
implementing in the Trans-Caucasus is acquiring a real geopolitical
outline.

Adding to this an idea of an “impending oil revolution in Baku” which
is being widely propagated by western media, one may conclude that
Baku has a real reason for concern. If Yerevan and Tbilisi are really
forming a bloc (it is worth mentioning in this respect that some
European media reported on the “Armenian roots” of Mr. Saakashvili),
Baku will be bound to overcome the so-called regional isolation.

However, it seems that this combination has been disclosed in Moscow.
The Russian Embassy in Armenia issued a note in which the actions of
Boris Berezovsky and his associate Mr. Litvinenko were qualified
respectively, as they are meant to complicate the relationships
between Yerevan and Moscow.

Of course, Boris Berezovsky is a master of intrigue. However, staying
in London longer, he is losing touch with the political situation in
the former USSR republics. Now he himself is becoming an object of
political manipulations, which can cause certain discomfort
personally to him and all his team. This is because we are going to
start our next report about Boris Berezovsky as follows: “As reported
by our source very close to the oligarch.”

Translated by Sergei Kolosov

Armenian rugby players a vanishing breed

Kolkata Newsline, India
May 28 2005

Armenian rugby players a vanishing breed

Shamik Bag

Kolkata, May 27: DURING the ’96-’97 rugby season in Kolkata, the
Armenian team, besides Armenians, also comprised Bengalis, Punjabis
and Chinese. That it went on to win the prestigious All India and
Southeast Asia Cup both years was reflective of the bonding in the
team and the society.

Today, the ball has stopped coming their way.

The club which, since 1890, has given the national team players like
Emil Vartazarian, Vahik Hovik, Avo Tevanian and N Madathian – hasn’t
had enough players to form a team for the last four years.

In the decline of the game is rooted the story of the city – its fall
from grace as a destination for a community that has traditionally
taken the trading route from Iran and Armenia. Even a few decades
ago, the city was home to a few thousand Armenians.

“Now, no more than 500 members of the community are here,” says
Henrik Terchonian, who came to Kolkata in 1987 and debuted for India
nine years later.

Says Arsham Sookias, who played rugby in Kolkata for 33 years
starting in 1947: “During the Raj, Armenians used to work in
Armenian properties like Queens’ Mansion, Park Mansion and in the
jute and shellac industries. But getting a work permit is very
difficult these days. Most have migrated to Australia and the
Americas. Besides, the school system in Iran has improved and the
attraction of studying in Kolkata has diminished.”

The state of the sport in India has contributed equally to the
decrease of Armenians, particularly rugby players, in the city.

“Rugby, unlike cricket, provides few opportunities in India. Many of
the players have migrated,” says Henrik.

Still, there is an attempt to revive the game in the Armenian College
on Free School Street.

Under Henrik, a batch of youngsters are being groomed, with an eye on
the Calcutta Cup, Centenary Cup and the All India and Southeast Asia
Cup.

“They are doing well. By the time of Commonwealth Games in Delhi,
they should be ready,” says Henrik.

Without the Armenians, the standard of rugby has suffered, says David
Yah, former manager of the Indian rugby team and present coach of the
CCFC team.

“They were the torchbearers of rugby in India and now without their
enthusiasm and exuberance, everybody is feeling the pinch,” says
Verghese Kunjachan, coach of the police team.

Turquie, discriminations: Jacques Chirac tente de deminer le “non”

Les Echos
25 mai 2005

Turquie, discriminations: Jacques Chirac tente de déminer le «non»

MURYEL JACQUE

Avant sa déclaration solennelle aux Français, demain soir, Jacques
Chirac s’est appliqué, hier, à défendre les valeurs «portées haut»,
selon lui, par la Constitution européenne. «Le pluralisme, la
non-discrimination, la tolérance, la justice, la solidarité,
l’égalité entre les femmes et les hommes, le respect des
minorités…», a-t-il énuméré dans une lettre adressée au Conseil de
coordination des organisations arméniennes de France. Soucieux de
rassurer les Français qui s’inquiètent – notamment à droite – d’une
éventuelle entrée de la Turquie dans l’Union, Jacques Chirac a
rappelé qu’Ankara avait «encore un long chemin» à parcourir. Pour la
première fois, il a surtout affirmé que ce chemin serait «plus long»
avec la Constitution européenne que sans, un argument un peu
paradoxal pour le chef de l’Etat lorsque l’on sait que, sur le fond,
il est favorable à l’adhésion de la Turquie. C’est en tout cas le
même argument que celui développé par Nicolas Sarkozy à la différence
près que le président de l’UMP est opposé à l’idée d’une Turquie
européenne. Il défend l’idée d’un simple «partenariat privilégié»
entre Ankara et l’UE. Hier, Jacques Chirac a également affirmé qu’il
attendait de la Turquie «qu’elle mène à son terme cet impératif
devoir de mémoire» vis-à-vis du génocide arménien, se disant
«convaincu qu’elle en comprendra la nécessité». Le président s’est
par ailleurs adressé aux électeurs de gauche. Dans une interview
accordée au mensuel des banlieues «Pote à Pote», il a indiqué que la
Constitution «consacre l’égalité entre hommes et femmes dans tous les
domaines, y compris en matière d’emploi, de travail et de
rémunération».

Avec ce traité, «nous nous donnons de nouvelles chances dans le
domaine économique et social. Nous donnons tout son sens à la
solidarité entre les nations et les peuples», a-t-il assuré,
qualifiant la discrimination de «poison de la démocratie».