ANKARA: Turkey denounces Belgium over flag burning

The New Anatolian, Turkey
April 27 2005

Turkey denounces Belgium over flag burning

Turkey officially denounced the Belgian government yesterday for not
preventing the burning of a Turkish flag during an Armenian
demonstration over the weekend.

Turkish Embassy officials in Brussels handed a written note to the
Belgian Foreign Ministry expressing the deep sorrow of the Turkish
government about the lack of intervention by Belgian security forces
at the scene when demonstrators set fire to the Turkish flag.

The Turkish flag was burned by demonstrators at a demonstration
organized to commemorate the anniversary of the so-called Armenian
genocide on Sunday.

Turkey: Human rights defenders threatened with death

AZG Armenian Daily #074, 26/04/2005

Press release

TURKEY: HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS THREATENED WITH DEATH

Paris-Geneva, April 21, 2005. The Observatory for the Protection of Human
Rights Defenders, a joint programme of the International Federation for
Human Rights (FIDH) and the World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT),
expresses its deepest concern about recent death threats against four
executives of the Human Rights Association in Turkey (Insan Haklari Dernegi
– IHD).

According to the information received, Mrs. Kiraz Biçici, vice-president of
IHD, Mrs. Eren Keskin, chairperson of the Istanbul Branch of IHD, Mr. Doðan
Genç, member of the General Executive Board of IHD and Mr. Þaban Dayanan,
Board member of the Istanbul Branch of IHD, received death threatening
letters at their home and offices, on April 19 and April 21, 2005.

These letters were signed by an armed ultra-nationalist group called the
Turkish Revenge Brigade (Türk Ýntikam Tugayi – TIT), which claimed
responsibility for the armed attack perpetrated against the IHD headquarters
in Ankara in 1988, during which the then IHD President, Mr. Akin Birdal, was
very seriously wounded after having been shot with six bullets (See
Observatory Annual Report 1998-1999). According to the authors of the
letters, the recipients might not be as lucky as him, who survived this
attack.

The letters also referred to the events that occurred in Mersin,
South-Eastern Turkey, on March 21, 2005, after a group of children swept a
Turkish flag. These events led to an upsurge of ultra-nationalist activity
in Turkey; for instance, on April 6, 2005, five activists distributing
leaflets in the northern city of Trabzon, protesting against solitary
confinement and isolation in Turkey’s prisons, were reportedly nearly
lynched by a mob which thought they were burning a Turkish flag. The authors
of the above-mentioned letters stated that every provision must be made to
protect the Turkish flag, which is, according to them, “a symbol of a
nation’s history written with blood”.

Moreover, these threats followed other threatening letters that were sent to
the IHD headquarters’ email addresses during the last two months.

The Observatory is deeply concerned about those threats, which contribute to
seriously deteriorate the situation of Turkish human rights defenders, in
particular IHD members, who are already subjected to different kinds of
pressure (intimidation, judicial harassment, surveillance, etc.).

The Observatory calls on the Turkish authorities to:

– Guarantee, in all circumstances, the physical and psychological integrity
of Mrs. Kiraz Biçici, Mrs. Eren Keskin, Mr. Doðan Genç and Mr. Þaban
Dayanan, as well as all other IHD members and Turkish human rights
defenders;

– Conduct an independent enquiry into those events, so as to identify those
responsible, bring them to trial and sanction them according to law;

– Ensure the implementation of the provisions of the Declaration on Human
Rights Defenders adopted by the UN General Assembly on December 9, 1998, in
particular its articles 1, which states that “everyone has the right,
individually or in association with others, to promote and to strive for the
protection and realisation of human rights and fundamental freedoms” and
12.2, which provides that “the State shall take all necessary measures to
ensure the protection by the competent authorities of everyone, individually
or in association with others, against any violence, threats, retaliation,
de facto or de jure adverse discrimination, pressure or any other arbitrary
action as a consequence of his or her legitimate exercise of the rights
referred to in the present Declaration”;

– Guarantee the respect of human rights and fundamental freedoms in
accordance with the Universal Declaration on Human Rights and other
international human rights instruments ratified by Turkey.

Film de quartier; “Les Mauvais Joueurs” de Frederic Balekdjian

Le Figaro, France
23 avril 2005

Film de quartier; «Les Mauvais Joueurs» de Frédéric Balekdjian

Dans le quartier du Sentier à Paris, Vahé vit d’expédients et de
petits trafics avec son frère Toros et son copain Sahak. Mais les
arnaques au bonneteau et le profit des ateliers clandestins ne
peuvent sauver la boutique de tissus de son père ou retenir sa
compagne Lu Ann en train de le quitter. Sa vie est un échec et une
série de compromissions qui vont exploser avec l’arrivée de Yuen, le
frère de Lu Ann, qui va l’obliger à remettre en cause la fidélité à
ses amis et, plus loin, la valeur fragile de son existence. Le jeu de
bonneteau entouré de visages curieux et méfiants, les rues
grouillantes d’une faune inquiétante, l’atmosphère besogneuse et
feutrée des ateliers clandestins, c’est d’abord une atmosphère que
respire le premier film de Frédéric Balekdjian. Entre le polar et
l’étude de milieu, il a placé un trentenaire indécis et insatisfait
qui regarde le monde qui l’entoure, les petits truands qui se
démènent, les minables magouilles, la violence urbaine et, au-delà,
la vie d’une communauté, les Arméniens, et d’un quartier, celui du
Sentier, qu’il semble connaître comme sa poche. Il ne faut donc pas
s’attendre à un suspense tendu, à une action trépidante ou à des
tensions psychologiques. Les Mauvais Joueurs, son petit peuple
d’immigrés, son climat poisseux et affairé, a d’abord pour vedette un
lieu coloré, attachant et menaçant puis le visage désabusé et perdu
de Pascal Elbé, jeune homme qui cherche autre chose en se cherchant
lui-même au milieu de ses mauvaises habitudes, des clans, des
copains, des coquins.

Avec quelques longueurs, une nonchalance qui veut s’attarder sur des
détails ou sur le néant d’une vie, le film poursuit lentement son
chemin jalonné d’éclairs de violence. Ce n’est pas le Sentier de la
guerre mais plutôt celui du naufrage et d’un certain malaise que l’on
ressent, impalpable et insidieux comme un désespoir existentiel plus
profond et moins avouable. Pour ceux qui aiment regarder et méditer
avant l’orage. D. B.

BAKU: Paper analyses scenarios of US military presence in region

Azeri paper analyses scenarios of US military presence in region

Ayna, Baku
22 Apr 05

The Azerbaijani newspaper Ayna has said that the USA is planning to
secure its military presence in the South Caucasus and the Caspian
region by 2015. Analysing possible scenarios of the US presence in the
region, the paper said that the Pentagon regards Azerbaijan as a
starting point in the region and plans to complete the process of
establishing total control over the South Caucasus and Caspian Sea in
the next 10 years. Touching on the impact of this plan on the
settlement of the Karabakh problem, Ayna stressed that Washington will
either postpone the resumption of hostilities in Nagornyy Karabakh for
an indefinite period “in order to make people agree to the defeat” or
divide spheres of influence in the region with Russia on condition
that Moscow prioritizes Azerbaijan’s interests in the Karabakh
conflict settlement. The following is the text of C. Sumarinli report
by Azerbaijani newspaper Ayna on 22 April headlined “Azerbaijan is on
the Pentagon’s operations map” and “It will be known in 2015 which of
the US scenarios concerning the South Caucasus and the Caspian region
will succeed”. Subheadings as published:

The USA has set 2015 as the deadline for securing its military
presence in Azerbaijan, NATO sources have told Ayna. This is the
deadline for the integration of all the South Caucasus countries into
NATO.

According to the concept supported by NATO and the USA, all work on
the integration of the South Caucasus into Euro-Atlantic standards
must be completed by 2015. In this regard, specific provisions have
been made in the Individual Partnership Action Plan [IPAP], which is
expected to be approved by NATO, Georgia and Azerbaijan. Armenia is
also planning to submit the same document to the NATO leadership
soon. Under the plan, the NATO leadership considers it necessary to
conduct reforms in the state administration and defence spheres of its
partner states.

US operations map

There is no doubt that the main objective of military reforms in the
South Caucasus is to get the region, which is rich in natural
resources, away from Russia’s influence and implement certain future
plans with regard to Iran.

Washington’s operations plan concerning Azerbaijan is specific and the
map of our country’s military infrastructure is already in the
Pentagon. Military sources say that measures are being taken in some
military installations of Azerbaijan to prepare for a visit by NATO
officers.

The foreign press says that several military bases will be set up in
Azerbaijan by 2007 “in order to ensure security in the Caspian
region”. It must be remembered that by 2007, it is planned to bring
the Azerbaijani army in line with the standards of the alliance within
the framework of NATO’s IPAP plan. The Pentagon is demanding that
reforms in Azerbaijan’s defence sphere be completed by the end of
2007, experts believe.

A stage-by-stage action plan has already been launched to bring the
military in line with NATO standards. The Defence Ministry is
currently discussing training courses that will bring Azerbaijani
officers and soldiers in line with NATO standards under the guidance
of US and Turkish officers.

Experts think that the Pentagon’s main attention is currently focused
on air fields in the villages of Qala, Kurdamir, Cuxanli, Alat and
Haci Zeynalabdin Tagiyev, because Washington wants to set up its
military bases in these areas. It is clear why Washington wants to
keep precisely eastern Azerbaijan under control. In doing so, the USA
is trying to prove indirectly that they are not going to influence the
Nagornyy Karabakh conflict in any way or confront the Russian military
in Armenia, experts believe.

Second, it can be seen from the Pentagon’s steps that the USA aims to
take control of the energy-rich Caspian and neutralize Iran with the
help of its military presence in Azerbaijan.

The Pentagon’s “Caspian Plan” regards Azerbaijan as a starting point
in the region. Taking account of the fact that Kazakhstan will join
the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline and Turkmen President Saparmyrat
Nyyazow will not stand for the presidency in 2009, the process of
establishing total control over the Caspian should be completed by
2015. Of course, it is necessary to neutralize the two allies – Russia
and Iran – in order to achieve success in this issue.

Some sources say that if the USA does not manage to implement its
plans against Iran in one or two years, they will be implemented
between 2010 and 2015.

Azerbaijan in 2015

Experts think that if we take into consideration the current situation
in the South Caucasus and the Caspian Sea, there may be three
scenarios of future developments for the USA.

1. Complete victory – This will depend on the success of the
Pentagon’s military and political moves. If all these moves are
successful, the US presence in Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan and
Turkmenistan will become a reality. In this case, the Russian military
bases will be pulled out of Georgia, and Azerbaijan will not extend
its contract with Russia on the Qabala radar station, which expires in
2012. The process of installing purely pro-American political and
military leaders in the aforesaid countries, as well as in Armenia, is
continuing.

As a result of the successful development of events, the Iranian
government will be overthrown either through a “velvet revolution” or
a short-term military invasion. In order to implement all this, it is
important to keep Russia in its traditional position of an onlooker.

2. Minimum victory – It is “better than nothing” for Washington. Under
this scenario, the deployment of US military bases in Azerbaijan and
Georgia, the ensuring of Kazakhstan’s pro-Western policy and
Turkmenistan’s neutrality towards Russia might be the factors that
will secure the minimum victory. There is no way the USA can solve the
problem of Iran under this scenario because the countries of the
region, especially Russia, are still against any invasion of Iran.

3. Defeat – According to this scenario, the contract on the Qabala
radar station is extended for another 10 years although the USA sets
up military bases in Azerbaijan before 2015. The plans concerning
Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Iran remain unsolved. At the same time,
Russia keeps its bases in Georgia.

Under this scenario, it seems likely that Russia will create a
military alliance with these countries in the Caspian. Russia has
already started acting to this end. The USA and Russia may reach
agreement on dividing areas of influence at the end of the forthcoming
decade if the developments in the South Caucasus and the Caspian
region unfold under this scenario. This shows that there will be
certain changes in the US plans concerning the region. The USA will
either put off these plans for another 15 years (until 2030) or
confine itself to “the areas” it has acquired against the background
of Russia’s strengthening.

Azerbaijan’s benefit

The deployment of US bases in Azerbaijan is inevitable under all three
scenarios designed for the period until 2015. As we can see, compared
to the other four Caspian nations, the Pentagon can implement its
military plans concerning Azerbaijan. However, under the aforesaid
scenarios, Russia will retain its presence in Armenia until 2015 and
it will inevitably increase.

So, how will Azerbaijan benefit if 20 per cent of its territory are
under occupation? Experts think that events may develop in two
directions here.

1. The Pentagon will not interfere in the issue of Azerbaijan’s
occupied territories and postpone the possible resumption of
hostilities in the region for an indefinite period. In return, various
projects will be implemented to improve the social welfare of
Azerbaijani society. The priority purpose here is to “make people
agree to the defeat”.

2. The second scenario proceeds from the crux of the negotiations on
dividing the South Caucasus between the USA and Russia. Washington
agrees to Armenia’s role as Russia’s “outpost” in the South Caucasus,
while Moscow guarantees that Azerbaijan’s interests will be
prioritized in the settlement of the Karabakh conflict.

Experts think that the second scenario is less likely because Moscow’s
support for the return of Karabakh and other territories to Azerbaijan
can sharply weaken Russia’s positions in Armenia.

In general, we should wait for at least 10 years to find out what the
fate of the South Caucasus and the Caspian region will be like.

Parliament chairman calles on Turkey to come to terms with history

Armenpress

PARLIAMENT CHAIRMAN CALLS ON TURKEY TO COME TO TERMS WITH ITS HISTORY

YEREVAN, APRIL 24, ARMENPRESS: Armenian parliament chairman Arthur
Baghdasarian said he did not doubt that the Armenian genocide will be
recognized and punished by the civilized world in the 21-st century so that
Adolf Hitler’s words “Who remembers now about the massacres of Armenians?”
be never recalled again.
Speaking to reporters at Tsitsernakaberd Memorial after laying a wreath
at the Genocide Memorial Baghdasarian said the world is witnessing drastic
and interesting changes connected with the process of the recognition of the
Armenian Genocide, citing Poland’s parliament decision earlier this week to
recognize the genocide and a joint tribute to its victims in Paris by the
visiting Armenian president Robert Kocharian and his French host Jacques
Chirac.
“I am confident that we shall witness a major progress and we shall fight
together with the whole civilized world so that genocides never happen
again,” Baghdasarian said.
Baghdasarian also said Armenia wants the entire region, including also
Turkey, to be integrated with Europe, but added that application of double
standards was unacceptable, adding that before to join the EU Ankara must
recognize and condemn the Armenian genocide.
“I believe that Turkey will have to come to terms with its history as
history cannot be buried,” he said.

Congress of National Communities of Ukraine Urges Recognition

CONGRESS OF NATIONAL COMMUNITIES OF UKRAINE URGES UKRANIAN AUTHORITIES
TO OFFICIAL RECOGNIZE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

YEREVAN, APRIL 22. ARMINFO. Ukraine must undertake steps to officially
recognize the Armenian Genocide. This will help to prevent similar
crimes in the future, says the Congress of National Communities of
Ukraine in its address to the Ukrainian authorities.

The congress notes that over 1.5 Armenians were killed and deported
from their historical lands. “The Armenian Genocide was the first
genocide in the modern history and the nations of Ukraine who have
seen Golodomor and Holocaust understand the historical memory and the
open wound of the Armenian people.” “Paying tribute to the memory of
the Armenian Genocide victims we should realize the importance of
establishment of tolerance and peace in society.

BAKU: New reference book on Garabagh to be released

New reference book on Garabagh to be released

Assa-Irada, Azerbaijan
April 20 2005

Baku, April 19, AssA-Irada — The Milli Majlis (parliament) plans to
publish a new reference book on Upper Garabagh in English and Azeri
by September, according to Parliament Speaker Murtuz Alasgarov.

The book will be compiled by a special commission that includes
historians engaged in studying the Upper Garabagh conflict and
several MPs.*

Congressional Record: THE 90TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

Congressional Record: April 20, 2005 (Senate)]
[Page S4012]
>>From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:cr20ap05-113]

THE 90TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE OF 1915-1923

Mr. KOHL. Mr. President, this is in observance of the 90th
anniversary of the Armenian Genocide where atrocities were committed
against the Armenian people of the Ottoman Empire during the First
World War. In April 1915, the Ottoman government embarked upon the
systematic decimation of its civilian Armenian population. The Armenian
genocide was centrally planned and administered against the entire
Armenian population of the Ottoman Empire. The Armenian people were
subjected to deportation, expropriation, abduction, torture, massacre,
and starvation. The great bulk of the Armenian population was forcibly
removed from Armenia and Anatolia to Syria, where the vast majority was
sent into the desert to die of thirst and hunger.
Large numbers of Armenians were methodically massacred throughout the
Ottoman Empire. Women and children were abducted and horribly abused.
After only a little more than a year of calm at the end of WWI, the
atrocities were renewed between 1920 and 1923, and the remaining
Armenians were subjected to further massacres and expulsions. In 1915,
33 years before the UN Genocide Convention was adopted, the Armenian
Genocide was condemned by the international community as a crime
against humanity.
In 1923, the people of the region overthrew the Ottoman government
and established modern day Turkey. Since its establishment, the
Republic of Turkey has disputed the tragic suffering inflicted on the
Armenian people during this period. Sadly, it is estimated that 1.5
million Armenians perished between 1915 and 1923.
Affirming the truth about the Armenian genocide has become an issue
of international significance. The recurrence of genocide in the
twentieth century has made the recognition of the criminal mistreatment
of the Armenians by Turkey all the more a compelling obligation for the
international community. It is a testament to the perseverance and
determination of the Armenian people that they were able to overcome
one of the most egregious acts in history. I support this important
annual commemoration of a horrible chapter of history so that it is
never repeated again. Congress should continue to show support for
Armenia and their struggle to set the historical record straight on
this tragedy.
Mr. FEINGOLD. Mr. President, we solemnly remember the men and women
who perished in the Armenian genocide 90 years ago. A million and a
half Armenians were systematically massacred at the hands of the
Ottoman Empire and more than 500,000 fled their homeland.
When the Armenian genocide occurred from 1915 to 1923, the
international community lacked a name for such atrocities. In January
1951, the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of
Genocide entered into force to affirm the international commitment to
prevent genocide and protect basic human decency. Today, we have the
words to describe this evil, and we have an obligation to prevent it.
But we must also have the will to act.
During the Holocaust, and later in the former Yugoslavia and in
Rwanda, the world has seen the crimes of ethnic cleansing and genocide
recur again and again. Too often, the will to stop atrocities has been
lacking, or far too late in coming. Today, as we read report after
report detailing the horrific plight of the people of Darfur, Sudan, we
must muster the will and the sense of urgency required to save lives.
The international community has made the first steps, but it has a
long way to go in punishing and, especially, preventing genocide. As we
move forward, we must learn the lessons of Armenia’s genocide. We
cannot be misled by the rhetorical veils of murderous leaders, thrown
up to disguise the agenda at hand. We cannot respond to evidence of
methodical, brutal violence by wringing our hands and waiting for some
definitive proof that these events qualify as genocide. Enforcing a
collective, international commitment to prevent and stop genocides from
occurring is imperative. We owe the victims of the Armenian genocide
this commitment.
This is why we must remember the Armenian genocide. To forget it is
to enable more genocides and ethnic cleansing to occur. We must honor
its victims by reaffirming our resolve to not let it happen again.

Publisher honoured for courage to publish Kurdish books in Turkey

Publisher honoured for courage to publish Kurdish books in Turkey

KurdishMedia, UK
April 21 2005

21/04/2005 — International Freedom of Expression Exchange Abdullah
Keskin, a publisher who has been legally persecuted in Turkey for
publishing books in Kurdish, has won the 2005 Jeri Laber International
Freedom to Publish Award.

The annual prize honours book publishers outside the United States
who show courage in the face of political persecution and restrictions
on freedom of expression.

Keskin is the co-founder of Avesta, the first company in Turkey to
publish books in Kurdish, a language that was banned until recently.
Since its launch in 1996, Avesta has published more than 200 books
in Kurdish, Turkish and French.

More than 10 of Avesta’s books have been banned under Turkey’s
Anti-Terrorist Law, including a translation of former “Washington
Post” reporter Jonathan Randal’s book “After such Knowledge, What
Forgiveness: My Encounters with Kurdistan”. Keskin has also been
charged with disseminating “separatist propaganda.”

Although the Turkish government has relaxed restrictions on freedom
of expression in its bid to enter the European Union, writings on
Kurdish issues are still considered “dangerous” information.

Keskin will be honoured with the award at PEN American Center’s annual
Gala dinner in New York City on 20 April 2005.

The Jeri Laber International Freedom to Publish Award is administered
by the Association of American Publishers’ International Freedom to
Publish Committee.

For more information, visit: – Jeri Laber Award – AAP International
Freedom to Publish Committee – Writings by Jeri Laber

International Freedom of Expression Exchange

Turkish Publisher to Receive 2005 Jeri Laber International Freedom
to Publish Award

New York, New York, April 4, 2005-Abdullah Keskin, the courageous
Turkish publisher of Avesta, has been selected as the 2005 recipient
of the Jeri Laber International Freedom to Publish Award. He is being
recognized for his long commitment to Kurdish writings in the face
of great political obstacles-and personal peril-over the past decade.
The annual award, given for the third year by the International Freedom
to Publish Committee (IFTPC) of the Association of American Publishers,
will be officially presented at PEN’s annual Gala on April 20, 2005
at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City.

Hal Fessenden, chair of the International Freedom to Publish
Committee, said “Abdullah has courageously published politically
sensitive books on Kurdish issues, books long banned in Turkey,
books on current affairs, women’s studies, Mesopotamian culture,
and classics of Eastern and Western literature. We’re delighted to
recognize Abdullah with this award for his unfaltering commitment to
freedom of expression and for publishing such a rich and varied list.”

Abdullah Keskin was born in the Kurdish town of Nusaybin, in eastern
Turkey, in 1967. He is the eldest of ten children, and the first
person from twenty surrounding villages to go to university. While
at Ankara University, he was arrested and charged with reading an
illegal publication; he was held for five months before his trial,
and then acquitted. In 1992, he became the publisher of a weekly
Kurdish newspaper in Istanbul, one of the first to be published in
this prohibited language in Turkey.

In 1996, together with his wife Ruken Bagdu Keskin and sister Songul
Duraker, Abdullah Keskin founded Avesta, the first company in Turkey
to publish books in Kurdish, then still a prohibited language. They
began with four books in Kurdish, and have now published more than
200 books in Kurdish, Turkish, and French by writers from around the
world and across many genres, including women’s studies, literature,
poetry, travel, science, current affairs, minority studies, and
history. Avesta’s books have also been translated into more then
ten languages, including French, English, German, Bulgarian, Arabic,
Farsi, Norwegian, Swedish, Armenian, and Russian. Books prohibited
in Turkey for 150 years were brought to light through their efforts.

More than ten of Avesta’s books have been banned by the Turkish
State Security Council under Turkey’s Anti-Terrorist Law. These have
ranged from doctoral theses by respected scholars to Washington
Post correspondent Jonathan Randal’s “After Such Knowledge, What
Forgiveness: My Encounters with Kurdistan.” Keskin has been charged
with disseminating “separatist propaganda,” and has faced both
imprisonment and stiff fines. The books remain banned even though
Turkey’s laws have now changed. According to one judge’s statement,
Avesta’s fines could not be reduced because the publisher did not
show sufficient regret for his actions.

Although the Turkish Parliament has in recent years passed
constitutional reforms aimed at enhancing freedom of expression,
writing about – and in – Kurdish remains a sensitive and often
dangerous activity. In a recent meeting with a delegation of American
publishers, Keskin wisely commented that while he was not currently
on trial, he was only “storing the coffin” for future use. Throughout
his trials, and despite widespread publicity campaigns to discredit
Avesta’s work, Abdullah Keskin has never retreated from his commitment
to freedom of expression.

“I am pleased this year’s prize is being presented to a
Kurdish-language publisher,” said Keskin, reached in Istanbul.
“Throughout the Kurds’ modern history, our ability to express ourselves
and our culture freely has been repressed. I hope the work of Avesta
and the authors we work with can contribute to the widening of freedoms
enjoyed by Kurds.”

The International Freedom to Publish Award recognizes a book publisher
outside the United States who has demonstrated courage and fortitude
in the face of political persecution and restrictions on freedom of
expression. The award is named in honor of Jeri Laber, one of the
founding members of the IFTPC and the committee’s professional advisor
for more than twenty-five years. She was a founder of Helsinki Watch
(which ultimately became Human Rights Watch), and was its executive
director from 1979 to 1995. Her memoir, The Courage of Strangers:
Coming of Age with the Human Rights Movement, was published in 2002
by Public Affairs Books.

The IFTPC was founded in 1975 by the Association of American Publishers
(AAP). It was one of the first groups in the world formed specifically
to defend and broaden the freedom of the written word and to protect
and promote the rights of book publishers and authors around the
world. Among its activities, the committee monitors and publicizes
free-expression issues around the world, sends fact-finding missions
to countries where free expression is under siege, lobbies both at
home and overseas on behalf of persecuted book publishers, and offers
moral support and practical assistance to threatened publishers abroad.

The AAP is the national trade association of the U.S. book publishing
industry. The AAP’s approximately three hundred members include most
of the major commercial book publishers in the United States, as well
as smaller and nonprofit publishers, university presses, and scholarly
societies. The defense of intellectual freedom at home and freedom of
expression worldwide, the protection of intellectual property rights
in all media, and the promotion of reading and literacy are among
the association’s primary concerns.

PEN American Center and the AAP are partners in ongoing efforts to
protect the freedoms to write, publish, and read in the United States
and to expand these freedoms internationally. Presented at the PEN
Gala in New York, The Jeri Laber International Freedom to Publish
Award, the PEN/Barbara Goldsmith Freedom to Write Awards and the
PEN/Newman’s Own First Amendment Award all serve to draw attention
to women and men who have fought, often at great personal cost,
for these essential freedoms.

PEN American Center

Speech by President Robert Kocharian at the opening of”Ultimate Crim

AZG Armenian Daily #071, 21/04/2005

Armenian Genocide

SPEECH BY PRESIDENT ROBERT KOCHARYAN AT THE OPENING OF ‘ULTIMATE CRIME,
ULTIMATE CHALLENGE’ CONFERENCE

Mr. Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen:

We pay tribute to the memory of vanished victims as we commemorate the 90th
anniversary of the tragic events. We do it with doubled pain, since we are
still bound to continue the struggle for the international recognition of
the committed crime.

The First World War aimed at global re-distribution of the world and the big
ideological controversy of the 20th century that followed became the major
obstacles to recognition of the legitimate rights of the Armenian people. We
became victims of the First World War even though we were not the initiators
of that war. And our right for memory was sacrificed to the Cold War even
though we were not its masterminds.

When the planned policy of extermination of the Armenian nation was executed
the term “genocide” did not exist. Nor was it defined. There were no
international structures that could serve as a floor for discussions to give
a united response to that crime of genocide.

Obviously the world is changing. It took time for the world to treat
genocides as crimes against humanity with all the relevant consequences. It
took time to prevent the practice of sacrificing fundamental humanitarian
values to the geopolitical interests of great powers and to include the
moral considerations into foreign policy making of the civilized world. The
avenue of that change was tragic for many peoples. For the Armenian people
the price of that change equals one and a half million of human lives. Today
also the Armenian question is kept hostage to some geopolitical interests.

Modern technologies allow watching live the military operations unfolding in
different parts of the world, the term “genocide” is well defined, and
numerous regional and universal international organizations are put in
place. Countries are more determined in responding to a threat or attempt to
commit genocide in any part of the world. However, all this did not protect
the humanity from new genocides. Yugoslavia, Rwanda, East Timor, Sumgait –
in all these places once again innocent people were slaughtered. This comes
to prove that there is a need to amplify the efforts aimed at effective
suppression of the genocidal attempts.

That is exactly why the recognition and condemnation of genocides is so
crucial. Recognition bears in it a huge potential for adequate response.
Prevention of that crime is particularly important.

Condemnation of genocides committed in the past is also very important. It
first of all comes to prove that the crime has no expiration clause, and
those guilty will be brought to justice in any case. It is important in
terms of containment of future genocidal intentions.

It is through recognition and condemnation that states educate their
citizens. The lesson is: the state machinery shall not become a tool in
implementation of that terrible crime. We have the duty of establishing
atmosphere that would exclude any extremist divisions based on the
nationality, .ethnos, and religion or along any other dividing lines, any
propaganda of hatred by one group against another.

Another important component is the future fate of a people that has survived
genocide. The Armenian people, due to genocide, were displaced, became a
refugee people and were scattered across the globe. International
recognition of the Armenian Genocide and necessity of restoration of
historic injustice were sacrificed to the grand politics. Most of the
criminals who planned and implemented the genocide escaped the punishment.
Moreover, the remains of Taleat pasha who was assassinated in Berlin, were
returned to Turkey and buried with honors in Istanbul. It was a sad evidence
of carrying on the baton in relay race of impunity. The humanity pays a
tremendously high price for forgetting such crimes.

Using this opportunity I would like to thank all those countries, which at
different levels have addressed the issue of the Armenian Genocide and have
recognized it, as well as all those individuals and organizations that have
contributed towards that recognition. The role of Diaspora in that regard is
absolutely inestimable. By such recognition states also say “no” to all
possible future genocides. The number of victims of the Armenian genocide
could be incomparably higher and the fate of survivors much more severe if
not for a number of outstanding individuals, including Morgenthau, Bruce,
Nansen, Verfel, Brusov, Wegner, Lepsius, and many others who stood by our
people in those terrible days.

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

The Republic of Armenia, as an independent state, has put its position
straightforward: recognition of the Armenian Genocide is also important for
prevention of future possible genocides. Recognition is important for
Armenian-Turkish relations, since ii could give answers to many questions
that exist between our two peoples, it would allow to look ahead.

We remember the past with pain, but without hatred. For us it is difficult
to comprehend the response of the Turkish side, which is represented not
only by the denial of the past, but also by the blockade of nowadays
Armenia. We have came across a paradox that still needs to be apprehended.
The perpetrator, not the victim is furious with the past.

We are confident that international recognition of the Genocide will help
Turkey to come to terms with its own past and to overcome the complex which
is inherited from generation to generation and which creates additional
complexities in the relations of our neighboring nations.

I once again welcome all of you and wish you effective work. Thank you.