Armenian MPs reject bill on struggle against money laundering

Armenian MPs reject bill on struggle against money laundering

Itar-Tass, Russia
Nov 10 2004

YEREVAN, November 10 (Itar-Tass) – The Armenian MPs on Wednesday
rejected a bill on struggle against money laundering and financial
aid to terrorism. The bill failed to gain the required number of votes.

Central Bank Chairman Tigran Sarkisyan noted that the document provided
for the creation of a single financial monitoring centre under the
Bank of Armenia.

The bill specifies demands for financial flows from offshore zones
and establishes standards for handling transactions with money of
dubious origin.

The bill has become the first Armenian normative act to define the
notion of “financial terrorism”. It provides real mechanisms for
its warning.

The drafting of the bill is linked to Armenia’s accession to
international conventions on struggle against money laundering and
criminally earned incomes as well as the ratification of resolution
#1373 of the United Nations aimed at fighting against financial
terrorism.

It is still unknown when the MPs are going to return to the discussion
of this bill.

BAKU: Azeri leader not averse to Armenian MPs’ visit to Baku – TV

Azeri leader not averse to Armenian MPs’ visit to Baku – TV

Lider TV, Baku
9 Nov 04

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev has said that he is not averse to
Armenian MPs’ visit to Baku to attend the NATO Parliamentary Assembly’s
Rose-Roth seminar on 26-28 November, Azerbaijani Lider TV has reported.

“If we do not hold this seminar because of Armenians, this will
not be in Azerbaijan’s interests,” a Lider TV correspondent quoted
Aliyev as saying during his trip to the country’s southern districts
on 9 November.

ANKARA: Bush’s Victory, And A Nagging Question

Hurriyet, Turkey
Nov. 5, 2004

Bush’s Victory, And A Nagging Question
BYEGM: 11/5/2004
BY TUFAN TURENC

HURRIYET- When US President George W. Bush put the blame for the
September 11 attacks on distant countries and societies, he gained the
support of many conservatives. Many Americans saw Bush as a leader who
would protect them from terrorism. Thus, the Republicans scored a great
victory. Yet many other Americans and people in other parts of the
world thought that Bush’s violent policies would fail. We’ll see
whether Bush’s victory will make the US president and his hawks more
aggressive or make them see common sense. No doubt that Bush’s victory
is in no way good for the world. One cannot help but worry about
humanity when Bush is in office, because his policies can neither end
terrorism, nor lead to peace in the Middle East. Bush ruined everything
that his predecessor Bill Clinton did over eight years for a positive
US image internationally.

Even people who favor the war in Iraq accept that the US is in a
quagmire there. Over 1,100 American soldiers have been killed.
Americans have killed 100,000 Iraqi civilians. What was Bush’s
justification? `Saddam poses a threat to the US because Iraq has
weapons of mass destruction.’ These justifications proved wrong. What
will happen now? Iraq will become an even greater nightmare for the US.
What will the future of the region be if Bush leaves Iraq in such
chaos?

Looking at the US elections from the Turkish angle, the situation is
clear: US policies about Turkey wouldn’t have changed much even if
Kerry had been elected. In fact Kerry’s policies on Cyprus and the
Armenian question weren’t clear, and this could have caused some
problems. Thus, in the short term, Bush’s victory is good for Turkey.
But in the long run, there’s no doubt that Bush’s violent policies will
also harm Turkey. In the future the US will have to leave Iraq in chaos
and this will cause trouble for Turkey and other countries in the
region. Whatever we say, the world will have to live with Bush for four
more years. The election is over, but this question still nags me.
Would Bush have won if Hillary Clinton had been the Democrats’
candidate instead of Kerry?

Georgian Oligarch Goes Home to Lift Georgia’s Economy

The New York Times
An Oligarch Goes Home to Lift Georgia’s Economy
By ERIN E. ARVEDLUND

Published: November 5, 2004
TBILISI, Georgia – Kakha Bendukidze, the new Georgian economy minister,
points out his window in downtown Tbilisi to the shabby refugee hotel framed
by a setting sun. “See that large building with the boarded-up windows?” he
says. “It’s going to be either a Four Seasons hotel, or maybe commercial
office space.”
In one of the minister’s first privatizations in the former Soviet republic,
the 330-room Iveria hotel was sold at auction to German investors in
September. As part of the $2.3 million purchase price, the investors bought
out more than 1,000 refugees from a civil war here in the early 1990’s who
were still living in the Iveria, in what was supposed to be temporary
housing. Each of the 270 families was to receive $7,000 – market price, but
not in downtown Tbilisi – for a new apartment.
Such are the legacies of former President Eduard Shevardnadze, who ruled the
country for more than a decade of political stability but economic
stagnation.
The languishing of the hundreds of thousands of displaced people is “a huge
problem,” Mr. Bendukidze said. “These people were being used as a political
tool, as a sword of Damocles. They need to be integrated in society and have
property rights like everyone else.”
They also are occupying some of Georgia’s most valuable real estate, the
sale of which Mr. Bendukidze is hoping will help undo decades of decay and
revitalize a country where nearly half the population lives below the
official poverty line.
Ultraliberal in his economics, Mr. Bendukidze, a Georgia native and a
biologist turned corporate raider, became a multimillionaire oligarch in
Russia, though he did not take part in the big, controversial auctions
there. Instead, he bought small companies and put them together. In June,
Georgia’s new populist president, Mikhail Saakashvili, asked him to leave
his company, United Heavy Machinery, to return to the land he left after
college and help do the heavy economic lifting.
“The president wanted to find accomplished, successful Georgians, and take
advantage of their experience,” says Zeyno Baran, a Georgia expert at the
Nixon Center, a foreign policy institute in Washington. “Bendukidze was one
of the very few people who made money legally in Russia.”
But Mr. Bendukidze, a large man with a big agenda, has ruffled many feathers
with his attempts at market reforms in Georgia – largely by inviting private
investors in – efforts through which he, Mr. Saakashvili and a circle of
reformers want to jump-start the economy.
Under Mr. Shevardnadze, many tiny enterprises were privatized, but only a
few large, important businesses, like the Batumi Oil Terminal. Mr.
Bendukidze’s list, however, has 1,800 enterprises of all sizes – including a
proctology clinic, vineyards, factories, a hydropower station, Georgia’s
aging airport and beach resorts (refugees included). At the dusty Ministry
of Economic Development, off Tbilisi’s main street, Mr. Bendukidze has set
up a hotline and a Web site () for anyone interested in
buying government-owned assets. Turks, Europeans, Americans and especially
Russians have been poking around.
With the look of the Northern California wine country, but replete with
elegant buildings that have seen better days, Georgia is still a developing
country, with per capita income of about $3,000 a year. Even in the capital,
the electricity is spotty and phone lines are ancient.
“We have to grow at 6 percent a year for 50 years to catch up, and that’s
with no mistakes,” Mr. Bendukidze says. He wants Georgia to grow into the
next New Zealand, a country whose radical finance ministers of the 1980’s
and 1990’s, Sir Roger Douglas and Ruth Richardson, “turned around a
backward, slow economy into a dynamic one.”
Among Mr. Saakashvili’s young cabinet members, Mr. Bendukidze, 48, says,
“I’m an old elephant.”
Mr. Bendukidze rarely minces words, and his temper is well known among
foreign aid organizations. According to a BBC report, he called
International Monetary Fund representatives “fools” on Georgian television
when they cautioned against major tax cuts he had suggested. And a World
Bank employee recalls being cursed out at his office.
Mr. Bendukidze does not apologize for his fundamentalism. “Without the help
of foreign aid, you are independent, and that’s very important,” he says.
“Foreign aid as the main source of your budget spending is terrible.”
In 2005, Georgia’s budget will total $1 billion, with $150 million, or about
15 percent, in foreign credits and grants. He wants the aid close to zero in
three years.
In his quest for private money, Mr. Bendukidze has been criticized for
sometimes having a political tin ear. Scott Horton, a partner at the law
firm of Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler in New York, who hired Mr.
Saakashvili to work at the firm in 1994 after Mr. Saakashvili graduated from
Columbia Law School, says Georgians are highly sensitive to Russian
investors.
“In Armenia and other countries, the Russians bought up everything, and now
they’re very much dependent on Moscow,” he said. “Georgians don’t want to
do that. Bendukidze isn’t quite as sensitive to those issues.”
Mr. Bendukidze says he is eager to attract as many buyers as possible – from
wherever.
So will the result be Georgia Inc.? Not exactly, Mr. Bendukidze says.
Back in Russia, he ran a company with twice the budget and seven times the
debt of his home country, and was free to hire and fire without political
fallout.
Not in Georgia. But he is determined to set an example by cutting
bureaucracy at his own ministry, letting two-thirds of his 2,400 staff
members go. The only way to pull Georgia out of poverty, he says, is to cut
the bloat, strip vested interests and end corruption.
“There are a lot of people who own or run government property burning state
money and putting ash in their own pockets,” Mr. Bendukidze says. “It’s not
two or three people, it’s managers with thousands of employees whom no one
needs, workers who aren’t creating wealth.
“This is why I am the most hated man in Georgia,” he adds with a laugh.
With the Finance Ministry, Mr. Bendukidze is helping to write and submit new
laws for passage in parliament that would lower the personal income tax rate
to 12 percent from 20 percent, cut taxes on corporate profits and deregulate
the banking and insurance industries.
He is also proposing that banks and insurers from the 30 Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development countries be allowed to set up
branches, and that dollars and euros be allowed for transactions.
Most controversial, both inside and outside Georgia, are Mr. Bendukidze’s
efforts to reverse deals he says were cut unfairly in Mr. Shevardnadze’s
era – in particular, the 1999 sale of the Batumi Oil Terminal. That
privatization, in part financed and owned by the Overseas Private Investment
Corporation, a United States government agency, “was illegal,” Mr.
Bendukidze says. The agency did not return calls for comment.
Karin Lissakers, an adviser to the Open Society Institute, a group backed by
the billionaire George Soros and based in New York that has been aiding the
Saakashvili administration, says it is important that Georgia regain Batumi,
a major port economically. Moreover, she said, all customs revenue had been
going to Aslan Abashidze, the ousted leader of Adjaria, the region where
Batumi is located, instead of to Tbilisi.
The terminal’s chairman is Jan Bonde Nielsen, a Danish businessman and close
associate of the former regional government. “We told him we want him to be
a partner, but the Georgian government also wants its share,” Mr. Bendukidze
says. Mr. Nielsen also did not respond to phone calls seeking comment.
What about the seeming incongruity of his laying down rules in Georgia – for
transparent, honest privatizations with clearly enforced property rights –
that many of his fellow oligarchs in Russia did not follow during the
rough-and-tumble privatization there?
“I’m sorry,” he said, shrugging. “But that game is over.”

www.privatization.ge

BAKU: Estonia Delegation Met with Chairman of State Diaspora Cmt.

Azer Tag, Azerbaijan
Nov. 1, 2004

DELEGATION OF ESTONIA MET WITH CHAIRMAN OF STATE COMMITTEE ON AFFAIRS
OF AZERBAIJANIS LIVING IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES
[November 01, 2004, 19:49:30]

On 1 November, the Parliamentary delegation of Estonia now visiting
Azerbaijan met with Chairman of the State Committee on Affairs of
Azerbaijanis Living in Foreign Countries Nazim Ibrahimov.

The latter noted that over 50 mln Azerbaijanis are living today in 70
countries, and the Committee founded by the Decree of national leader
of Azerbaijan late President Heydar Aliyev is commissioned to be a
coordinating body for uniting compatriots to solve a lot of existing
problems. One of the today’s most important issues the State Committee
is now engaged in is to create an Azerbaijani lobby in the countries of
their residence.

Touching upon the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh,
Mr. Nazim Ibrahimov described it as most complicated and acute problem
of the country. Twenty percent of our lands are under Armenian
occupation and over one million people are refugees. As he stressed
strategic goal of Azerbaijan is integration into the European
structures, and Estonian experience is very important for us, he said.

Head of the Estonian delegation Marco Michelson noted for his part that
Estonia as a former Soviet country is well aware of the problems of the
newly independent states, and can share its experience concerning
integration into Europe.

We are successfully cooperating with delegations of the Azerbaijani
parliamentarians in the Council of Europe and other international
structures, he said.

BAKU: Foreign Minister Of Azerbaijan Meets ICRC Representative In Th

FOREIGN MINISTER OF AZERBAIJAN MEETS ICRC REPRESENTATIVE IN THE COUNTRY

Azer Tag, Azerbaijan
29 Oct. 2004

[October 29, 2004, 22:25:32]

Foreign minister of Azerbaijan Republic Elmar Mammadyarov on 29 October
met representative of the International Committee of Red Cross (ICRC)
in the country Merry Vernts, press service of MFA told AzerTAj.

The ICRC representative informed the foreign minister on the latest
activity of the Organization in the Republic, thanked for interest and
attention the leadership of Azerbaijan shows to the Committee, stated
that activity of the Azerbaijan diplomatic representation in Geneva
positively impacts on the links between the Committee and the Republic.

Speaking of the cooperation between the government of Azerbaijan and
ICRC, foreign minister Mammadyarov gave high value to its activity in
the occupied territories of Azerbaijan, in particular, the Committee’s
efforts in finding Azerbaijanis in captivity. Touching upon settlement
of the Armenian population in the occupied areas of Azerbaijan, the
Minister expressed hope that the Committee would closely engaged in
this question. The policy of Armenia negatively impacts on the process
of settlement of the Armenia-Azerbaijan, Nagorny Karabakh conflict, and
the Committee should have particular attention to this question, the
Minister emphasized.

Also were exchanged views on other questions of mutual interest.

“If Turkey Enters Europe, Won’t It Turn Out That We Are Blockaded By

“If Turkey Enters Europe, Won’t It Turn Out That We Are Blockaded By EU?”

Azg/am
30 Oct 04

Armenian Ambassador interview to La Padania

Gagik Baghdasarian, RA ambassador to Italy, gave an interview to the
Italian La Padania daily and expressed an idea that “Turkey isnâ~@~Yt
ready to begin negotiations with the EU yet. The issue of recognizing
the Armenian Genocide is still open. This is one of the most important
issues, as it isnâ~@~Yt acceptable that a country carries such a
heavy weight. But there are many other issues, as well.”

Ambassador brought the issue of the Armenianâ~@~STurkish borders
among the ones he mentioned. “It has been ten years that Turkey keeps
the borders blocked, hindering any communication of Armenia with the
outer world. If Turkey enters Europe, wonâ~@~Yt it turn out that EU
puts Armenia in blockade?”, he said.

The reporter of La Padania, in his turn, pointed out: “Turkeyâ~@~Ys
entrance to Europe by Old Continentâ~@~Ys virtual consent
will arise another unsolved “moral issue” with heavy diplomatic
developments. According to that frightening supposition, the country of
semi-moon will become the South-Eastern edge of Europe, and the Turkish
borders, which in that case will be considered European borders, will
become the last bastion of Brussels for the country that suffered
from Turkey and is considered the enemy of the Turks till now. Thus,
the Turkeyâ~@~Ys attitude full of hatred and threats towards the
Armenians, in some respect, will become Europeâ~@~Ys position”.

–Boundary_(ID_vbYDkm1lXY/GmIQUmaLjng)–

Turkey’s accession to EU to insure Armenia against war with Azerbaij

Turkey’s accession to EU to insure Armenia against war with Azerbaijan – paper

Aykakan Zhamanak, Yerevan
28 Oct 04

Text of unattributed report by Armenian newspaper Aykakan Zhamanak
on 28 October headlined “We are a nation that ‘keeps traditions'”

The prospect of Turkey joining the European Union has caused a vague
rumpus in Armenia, and in fact, at the state level our country is
against Turkey’s joining the EU.

An analysis of Armenia’s position unequivocally shows that our country
is against Turkey’s joining the EU stemming not from future reasons but
from those of the past. This approach is vulnerable because in fact
it is taken at the traditional Armenian reflex level: Turkey means
the enemy. But a sober analysis stemming from the state interests of
Armenia should tell our political forces that Turkey’s joining the
EU meets the interests of Armenia. In this case Armenia will find
itself among the countries that border the EU, which will make the
prospect of our country joining the EU more realistic.

But the problem has another more important aspect. If we stem from
the point of view that Turkey is our enemy and a potential threat to
Armenia, in this case we should be more interested in this country’s
joining the EU, because if we assess Turkey’s current possible
aggression against Armenia as 10, Turkey’s possible aggression will
not be more than one after it becomes a European Union member even
given the most pessimistic predictions.

If today there is little opportunity for the war against Azerbaijan
to resume, Armenia should be interested in beginning talks
with Turkey regarding its European Union membership as soon as
possible. Because if we assess Turkey’s current possible mediation
in an Armenian-Azerbaijani war as 10, it cannot be more than 0.01 for
Turkey which is in talks on joining the EU. Negotiations with Turkey
regarding its EU membership could be that guarantee which will insure
us against restarting war with Azerbaijan.

Wales recognizes “Armenian genocide”

Wales recognizes ‘Armenian genocide’

Assa Irada
26 Oct 2004

Members of the city council of Cardiff, Wales have stated recognition
of the fabricated ‘Armenian genocide’ last week, a member of the
council and the Armenia-Wales friendship society Rodny Berman said. A
monument to the ‘genocide’ victims will be erected in Cardiff in 2005,
he noted.

According to Berman, recognition of the ‘Armenian genocide’ has been
a priority in the activity of the Armenia-Wales friendship society
over the last three years. The society members regard this step as
the first stage in recognizing the ‘genocide’ by the United Kingdom.*

Both Azerbaijan and Armenia decided to suspend Karabakh talks,spokes

Both Azerbaijan and Armenia decided to suspend Karabakh talks, spokesman says

Mediamax news agency
27 Oct 04

Yerevan, 27 October: “No matter what statements Azerbaijan issues,
we have repeatedly announced and confirmed that Nagornyy Karabakh’s
status is a high priority for Armenia,” the press secretary of the
Armenian Foreign Ministry, Gamlet Gasparyan, said in Yerevan today.

Gasparyan said this commenting on Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar
Mammadyarov’s statement that the latest talks had discussed Armenia’s
withdrawal from seven occupied districts around Nagornyy Karabakh.

“All other issues derive from the problem of status, and Armenia
regards them exclusively in the context of the future status of
Nagornyy Karabakh,” Gasparyan said. He added that Armenia had an
interest only in the final settlement of the Nagornyy Karabakh problem
and this approach determined its involvement in the talks.

Commenting on Mammadyarov’s another utterance that in Astana [in
September 2004] Armenian President Robert Kocharyan had taken time-out
“to analyse the results of the meetings”, Gasparyan said that the
Azerbaijani and Armenian leaders had made a joint decision to suspend
the talks.

“We have not yet received a reply from Azerbaijan on the issues of
interest to Armenia,” Gasparyan said.