114th Anniversary Of Armenian Liberation Movement Marked In ZeitunDi

114TH ANNIVERSARY OF ARMENIAN LIBERATION MOVEMENT MARKED IN ZEITUN DISTRICT OF TEHRAN

TEHRAN, November 8 (Noyan Tapan). An arrangement dedicated to the
114th anniversary of the Armenian liberation movement was held at the
“Sukerian” hall of the Zeitun district of Tehran.

According to the “Alik” daily newspaper of Tehran, Ara Shahnazarian
was the key noter of the celebration organized on this occasion for
the second time in succession (after the arrangement organized at the
“Komitas” and “Nairi” halls). He mentioned that this movement was
the protector of the rights of the Armenian nation and the Armenian
Cause from the very beginning up to now, and the ideological youth
was always in the first ranks of this movement.

Then Levon Shant’s “Yesin Mard” play was staged and national songs
were performed.

New project strengthens Georgian-EU relations

New project strengthens Georgian-EU relations
By Anna Arzanova

The Messenger, Georgia
Nov 8 2004

The presentation of a European Union funded project, which envisages
the strengthening and deepening of cooperation between the EU and
Georgia, was held in Tbilisi on November 5.

The project is aimed primarily at increasing the ability of state
institutions to support the implementation of the 1999 Partnership
and Cooperation Agreement (PCA), which is the main instrument for
developing mutually beneficial relations between Georgia and the EU,
as well as democratic and structural market reforms in the country.

To achieve this, the one year project, which is also aimed at building
awareness of European integration in Georgian society and will cost
700,000 Euros, will “assist governmental agencies to prioritize,
coordinate, manage and monitor the PCA implementation process,” “build
the relevant human resource capacity through tailor made training,”
and ” build the government’s communication capacity, targeting both
the government and civil society.”

Within the framework of the project, a group of European and Georgian
experts will deliver advice and training in accordance with the
objectives of the project. Study visits to one of the new EU member
states and to Brussels will also be organized. The project will make
a technical needs assessment and supply government offices working
on EU issues with IT and communication technologies.

The project partner is the governmental commission for European
integration, while the beneficiaries of the project will include the
State Minister’s Office for European Integration, those ministries
participating in the PCA implementation process, relevant parliamentary
committees, media, the business community, and NGOs.

State Minister for European Integration Tamar Beruchashvili said that
November 5 was an important date for the country because it was the
beginning of a project which would help create effective resources
in Georgia. “Priorities of domestic foreign affairs are not just a
declaration, but a very precise concrete plan which we are going to
implement,” she stated.

According to Beruchashvili, a special council has been created which
will include virtually all those NGOs, expert groups, university
scholars and others who are assisting the Georgian government to
integrate into the EU.

“The main problem is a lack of well-trained human resources and
this project is going to help solve this problem and thus help the
government to implement the partnership and cooperation agreement
between Georgia and EU, the main objective of which is to make
Georgia an attractive country for the EU, to harmonize Georgian and EU
jurisdiction and to ensure resources which will serve this mechanism
and will make it more active,” she said.

Beruchashvili stressed that it is very significant that they are
able to speak in professional language to their European partners,
to understand how the European institutions work, to be involved
actively in this work, to defend their interests and to find their
place in the European family.

Executive vice-president of the think-tank Georgian Foundation for
Strategic and International Studies Temur Iakobashvili said at the
press conference Friday that “The project envisages the implementation
of a framework of access to partnership and cooperation agreement
and to create resources within the ministry so that they can work
with European partners,”

Iakobashvili added that this is the first time that Georgian
organizations have participated in the consortium, and he underlined
the good will of the Georgian government shown in involving so many
people in the process. “Integration into the European Union is not
the mission of organizations but also of the people as well,” he said.

Head of Operations of the European Commission’s delegation in Georgia
and Armenia Adriana Longoni expressed her great satisfaction in
being able to present the project. “The goal of the project is to
create a working environment for political dialogue in order that
Georgia consolidate its democratic, economic and market processes,”
Longoni said.

“This project can be adapted to the requirements of both parties.
This is one more very important step in our relations,” Longoni
stated, adding that the European Commission decided in 2004 to create
a neighborhood program for Caucasus countries, what means that after
enlargement, new mechanism of cooperation should be created.

“This also will support the consistent development of the country
to approach the European Union,” Longoni said. She thinks that it
is also very important to achieve the aims of this project, as well
as progress in adherence to the law, protection of human rights and
development of a market economy.

Longoni said that the progress of the project is based on a working
plan. “Within the framework of this, I want to welcome the first
meeting, which is also a starting point in the new environment after
the revolution to improve the processes of implementation. The new
neighborhood policy is very important for the creation of a people’s
group who are informed regarding these processes,” Longoni noted.

MP and Head of the Parliamentarian Committee of Foreign Affairs Kote
Gabashvili expressed his opinion that “this agreement is the biggest
achievement in relations with the EU.”

“It is a very significant project for us in approaching the EU. We can
see the special attitude of the EU and interest in Georgia,” he said,
expressing his confidence that their ambitions will help Georgia to
advance and to meet all the criteria, which will be quite difficult
but which will guarantee the survival of the country.

Team leader and Deputy Team leader of the Support of PCA Implementation
process Mats Nystrom and Kakha Gogolashvili also participated in the
launch on Friday.

A Family Name That Walks Ahead of Me

Los Angeles Times, CA
Nov 8 2004

A Family Name That Walks Ahead of Me

In America, the Arabic Sa’adah is difficult — a slow business of
articulated syllables and repeated A’s.

By Marjorie Gellhorn Sa’adah, Marjorie Gellhorn Sa’adah is a writer
in Los Angeles.

Because my father, a U.S. Army officer, was stationed in France in
1965, I was born in Paris.

BĂ©bĂ© Sa’adah was wrapped in a pastel blanket and taken home from the
hospital without a first name. My parents soon settled on one, and
the prénom Marjorie was entered on my French birth certificate, a
delicate carbon- paper page affixed with a stamp that indicated the
payment of a one-franc tax. I was only a day or two without a first
name, but in some ways, I feel as if my last name has walked ahead of
me ever since.

Sa’adah is an Arabic name. I say my name, and I watch as Americans
listen to it, write it down on forms and enter it into computers. I
pronounce it and spell it and make a little hooking motion with my
finger to help explain the apostrophe.

To Americans, the name is difficult, but I’ve found that through all
the flashing colors of terrorism alerts, few Americans seem to have
the cultural fluency to identify its source. I wish they did, that
the distance between us and the far-away, seemingly foreign people we
are at war with was shortened in this way.

The root of my name is sa’eed, “happy”; sa’adah is “true happiness.”
But the spelling of my name just approximates Arabic letters,
transcribed by immigration officials. My Syrian grandfather
immigrated to the U.S. after World War II when my father was a boy.
My grandfather’s brothers arrived in different years, met different
immigration officers, and the spelling of the name — A’s and E’s and
apostrophes — varies across the family.

The apostrophe stands for ayin, an Arabic consonant the English
alphabet lacks. Technically, an ayin is a “laryngeal voiced
fricative,” a sound my Arabic textbooks caution is difficult for the
non-Semitic tongue. It is a stopping sound, somewhat like the catch
between the two halves of “uh-oh.” Meeting me can be a slow business
of articulated syllables and repeated A’s.

I first attempted Arabic in graduate school, in a class so difficult
I dropped it before it sank my GPA like an anchor. Arabic calligraphy
flows right to left, each consonant is a choice of four intricate
letter forms, and vowels usually go unwritten — which makes for
difficult reading, let alone comprehension: lt ln cmprhnsn.

I tried again, on Sunday mornings at the Islamic Center in Los
Angeles. This time, I set a modest goal. I wanted to be able to greet
people: my grandfather, the Arabs and Arab Americans of my parents’
generation who correct me with a “tsk” when they hear me flatten out
my ayin, dulling the sound of my own name.

The classroom was tiny, windowless, filled by a dozen people. There
was an African American man and his teenage sons, learning Arabic to
help them study the Koran. There was a hip white woman who played
drums in a world music band and wanted to small-talk and joke with
her Arabic bandmates, and a teenager, wearing her coffee shop uniform
for her afternoon job, sent by her parents. A thin white man who
complained about the center’s coffee, noted everyone’s name and never
bought the textbooks. Our teacher taught him the words for “I will
walk to Starbucks,” but after three weeks the man stopped coming.

Except for him, my classmates and I came to know each other. We were
all from more than one place: “Ana min Misr; ana Amrikeah,” said an
engineer who lives in Riverside. “I’m from Egypt; I’m American.”

The most recent arrival was Farida, an Azerbaijani fleeing war
between ethnic Azeris and ethnic Armenians. On the airplane coming to
the U.S., she told us, the man seated next to her was Armenian. They
looked at each other, acknowledging their common destination — peace.

“He is not my enemy,” she said. “He is more like me than he is
different.”

None of us in the class were alike. The drummer smoked Marlboros
during breaks, Farida tucked stray hair back under her hijab. But we
were more alike than we were different.

We unfolded a map of the world and looked at the wide part of it that
speaks Arabic — countries that stretch across North Africa, through
the Middle East, into Asia. We learned the names of homelands and
wars and family members, and we traced all those lines toward Los
Angeles.

In 1965, I had a few days without a name, and, as it turned out, a
month without a country. That’s how long it took for my parents to
receive the official document that confirmed that I was a
foreign-born American citizen.

It’s tied with two long red ribbons, stamped with a glossy medallion,
embossed with the seal of the U.S. Department of State. It looks like
a prize, like a promise. It’s postmarked France, it’s written in
English, it says my name and, in one language of many, “Ana
Amrikeah.”

–Boundary_(ID_39s2GFoK9gHhcElG4SG3vw)–

“Armenian Jerusalem” at California University

“ARMENIAN JERUSALEM” AT CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY

Azg/Arm
6 Nov 04

Professor Richard Hovhannisian’s report “Armenian Jerusalem and
Armenians in the Holy City” will open the 15th scientific conference
of “Cities and provinces of historic Armenia” at the California
University in Los Angeles on November 6. As usual, the chair of
contemporary Armenian history of the University is the organizer of
the conference, and Armenian Patriarch of Jerusalem Archbishop Torgom
Manukian is the chairman.

According to Armenian Mirror Spectator, the two-day conference will
discuss Patriarchate’s history and Surb Hakob church manuscripts’
history, relations between the Armenian borough, Kingdom of Cilicia
and the Patriarchate, relations between Armenian church and other
confessions and present-day problems of the Holy City. Emma Kostandian
and Albert Kharatian are the only participants from Yerevan.

By Hakob Tsulikian

Tbilisi: Powell: US works with both Azerbaijan, Armenia regarding NK

The Messenger, Georgia
Nov. 5, 2004

Powel: U.S. works with both Azerbaijan and Armenia regarding Karabakh

According to Azeri 525 Gazeta, the Karabakh problem is touched upon in
a resent report of U.S. State Department. U.S. Secretary of State
Collin Powel stated that official Washington has close ties with the
Caucasus states and Central Asia, where its position is very strong.
Powel noted that Russian-American relations present a major interest
for the United States.
According to the State Department, Powel touched upon the problem of
Nagorno-Karabakh in a report on the three main problems of the foreign
policies of the United States. He said that the United States conducts
mutual work with Azerbaijan as well as with Armenia regarding the
settlement of conflict, however, Powel did not go into details.
Official Baku not once expressed dissatisfaction with the standpoint of
the United States in Karabakh.
The paper writes, “it can be assumed that after the last statement of
the U.S. Secretary of State, Washington will take a more active stand
in the matter of the settlement of the Karabakh problem.”
As the press service of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Armenia
Hamlet Gasparian said, regardless of the fact what Azerbaijan wants and
says, Yerevan thinks the important the issue of the Nagorno-Karabakh
status is to be settled at negotiations. According to him, “all other
issues” can be considered by Armenia only after solving the region’s
status.

NATO chief to meet with Azeri leadership during visit

Agence France Presse
Nov. 4, 2004

NATO chief to meet with Azeri leadership during visit

BAKU (AFP) Nov 04, 2004

NATO chief Jaap de Hoop Scheffer arrived in Azerbaijan Thursday where
he is expected to hold talks with top officials including President
Ilham Aliyev as part of a Caucasus tour.
De Hoop Scheffer is on a two-day visit to the Caucasus, a region that
hosts a massive pipeline to carry Caspian Sea oil to the West but is
torn apart by three separatist conflicts.

De Hoop Scheffer is scheduled to meet defense officials in Baku and
address students at the Baku State University Friday morning.

He arrives in Azerbaijan form Georgia and is expected to leave for high
level talks in Armenia Friday afternoon. All three Caucasus countries
are signatories to NATO’s partnership for peace plan.

“One thing (de Hoop Scheffer) will say is that we, as NATO, are
interested in stability in the region,” a spokesman for the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization in Brussels said when asked what the
military alliance’s chief would discuss here.

Aliyev has pledged to hold to the course set out by his father, Heidar,
whom he succeeded as president last year, and further integrate into
Euro-Atlantic structures.

But he has stopped short of asking for NATO membership as Azerbaijan
navigates the choppy diplomatic waters between the US-backed military
alliance and its cold war foe Russia.

Although oil-rich, Azerbaijan’s underdeveloped energy sector and
stunted economy still rely on its biggest trade partner and the
traditional power broker in the region Russia, were an estimated 2
million Azeris live.

Heidar Aliyev, who died last December, had offered NATO the opportunity
to open military bases on its territory, said Vafa Guluzade, a former
aide to the late Aliyev.

“The offer was met with silence and smiles, so I think NATO is not
ready for us yet. We should wait until they are before making
announcements that would irritate Russia and Iran,” Guluzade said.

Negociations d’adhesion de la Turquie; l’UE: recours d’Armeniens

Agence France Presse
29 octobre 2004 vendredi 9:32 AM GMT

NĂ©gociations d’adhĂ©sion de la Turquie Ă  l’UE: recours d’ArmĂ©niens de France

MARSEILLE 29 oct 2004

Des représentants de la communauté arménienne de France vont déposer
un recours devant le Conseil d’Etat pour demander Ă  Jacques Chirac de
s’opposer Ă  l’ouverture des nĂ©gociations d’adhĂ©sion de la Turquie Ă 
l’Union europĂ©enne tant qu’Ankara n’aura pas reconnu le gĂ©nocide
arménien, a-t-on appris auprès de leur avocat, Me Philippe Krikorian.

Les demandeurs, dont l’association Euro-ArmĂ©nie, basĂ©e Ă  Marseille,
et le conseil de coordination des organisations arméniennes de France
Marseille-Provence, veulent “protester contre la volontĂ© du prĂ©sident
Jacques Chirac de ne pas subordonner l’ouverture des nĂ©gociations Ă 
la reconnaissance prĂ©alable du gĂ©nocide armĂ©nien”, a prĂ©cisĂ© Me
Krikorian.

Le recours devant le conseil d’Etat “sera dĂ©posĂ© dans les prochains
jours”. Il fait suite Ă  la dĂ©cision du juge des rĂ©fĂ©rĂ©s du tribunal
administratif de Marseille, saisi mercredi d’une demande de “rĂ©fĂ©rĂ©
libertĂ©”, de se dĂ©clarer “incompĂ©tent”, selon la mĂŞme source. “C’est
un dĂ©ni de justice”, a-t-il ajoutĂ©. “Quels que soient les pouvoirs du
chef de l’Etat, celui-ci ne saurait se soustraire Ă  l’application du
droit”.

“A cinquante jours” du sommet europĂ©en de Bruxelles des 16 et 17
dĂ©cembre, qui doit se prononcer sur l’ouverture des nĂ©gociations, il
s’agit de “dĂ©noncer la violation par le gouvernement français des
termes de la résolution du Parlement européen du 18 juin 1987 et de
la loi française de janvier 2001 reconnaissant le gĂ©nocide de 1915”,
a ajoutĂ© Jean-Pierre Berberian, porte-parole d’Euro-ArmĂ©nie et
conseiller municipal (SE, ex-DL) de Marseille. “Non seulement Jacques
Chirac agit en violation du droit, il le fait contre la volontĂ© d’une
majoritĂ© de Français opposĂ©s Ă  l’adhĂ©sion de la Turquie”.

La communauté arménienne de Marseille compte environ 80.000
personnes, sur un total de quelque 450.000 en France.

Armenia develops relations with NATO and EU

Armenia develops relations with NATO and EU

Azg/Arm
5 Nov 04

Though NATO Membership Is not on the Agenda Negotiations Should be
Expected

Minister of foreign affairs of Armenia Vartan Oskanian noted recently
that Armenia doesn’t set a priority to become NATO member but will
deepen relations with the Organization.

Deputy foreign minister Ruben Shugarian informed Azg Daily that NATO
membership is not high on the agenda but there may come a point of
starting negotiations. NATO Secretary General is arriving in Yerevan
on November 5 within the frameworks of the South Caucasian visit.

“NATO is willing to deepen relations with Armenia. Though Armenia was
not as active in cooperation with NATO as its 2 neighbors, today we
see signs signaling of Yerevan’s readiness to maintain deeper
relations”, Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer informed Mediamax
news agency a day before his visit.

“Azerbaijan and Georgia have the NATO membership on their agenda’s.But
if take a closer look we’ll see that our cooperation with NATO does
not differ from those of Azerbaijan and Georgia. But if Azerbaijan and
Georgia have to take administrative, technical steps then Armenia has
too take political ones”, Shugarian said.

Deputy minister Shugarian held a speech recently in Michigan
University where he was invited to participate at a conference on
South Caucasus and Armenian policy. “My speech was mainly about EU’s
new neighborhood, Armenian-Turkish relations and political
perspectives for the 3 Caucasian states and region’s new geo-political
identity. My speech put an accent on the importance of the
Armenian-Turkish border-gate”, he said.

“That is not simply a Turkish border but NATO’s border with
Armeniawhich remains closed up to now. We may even call it the
region’s border with NATO as Georgia’s and Azerbaijan’s borders are
not wide enough to make relations tighter and secondly, it is not a
geographical issue but a geopolitical one”, Shugarian said in his
speech.

Yerevan should not pin hopes on NATO that it will make Turkey put an
end to Armenia’s blockade. On the other hand, Armenian authorities
hope that Turkey in its strive for the EU will open the
border. Shugarian said that at the European-Armenians’ congress in
Brussels last month the EU representative read a sentence from
European Commission’s report concerning Armenia.

“There is the following sentence in the report: â=80=98The perspective
that Turkey may become EU member will make it put relations right with
its neighborsâ=80=99. If the sentence were other way around, i.e. if
it said that the perspective that Turkey will not become EU member
will make it put relations right with its neighbors, that would be
completely a different thing. EU-Turkey talks may last a decade and
the day before the end of the talks Turkey may open the border”,
Shugarian said.

Six Armenian ambassadors from different European states participated
at the congress in Brussels. While the European-Armenians were holding
meetings appealing to European states not to include Turkey in the EU,
foreign minister Vartan Oskanian was speaking for Turkey’s accession
in Rome.

I don’t see any contradiction in what the European-Armenians say and
what the minister said. The issue was discussed in different legal
levels. We want to have a common border with the EU because our
further aim is joining the EU. Armenian communities of Europe may
have their view as regards Turkeyâ=80=99s accession. They may be
concerned about purely Armenian issues such as the blockade and the
Armenian Genocide”, Shugarian said.

Shugarian also notes that the issue of the Armenian Genocide is
mutually important for both the Armenian state and the Diaspora but
has diverse tints. “Firstly, Diaspora is a result of the Genocide. If
Diaspora considers Genocide acknowledgment, primarily by Turkey, a
reinstatement of historic justice then Armenia considers it a
guarantee for safety and prevention of possible recurrence in
future. They say that today’s Turkey is different. There are
differences, of course, but what’s Turkey’s attitude towards Armenians
today? We are in blockade and Turkey carries on an aggressive
policy. Blockade is a war action”.

By Tatoul Hakobian

Yerevan to expand military cooperation with Washington

Interfax
Nov. 4, 2004

Yerevan to expand military cooperation with Washington

Yerevan. (Interfax) – Military cooperation between the United States
and Armenia will expand regardless of the outcome of the presidential
elections in America, Armenian Defense Minister Serzh Sarkisian said
taking questions from journalists in Yerevan on Wednesday.

“Our cooperation with the United States has been developing and
expanding, and we will continue to follow this way,” the minister said.

He pointed out that the U.S. and NATO announced South Caucasus an area
of their strategic interests.

At the same time, Armenia is not seeking to join NATO now, and its
cooperation with the U.S. and the Alliance is not aimed at replacing
Russian-Armenian military-strategic partnership, he said.

Armenia’s Highest Political Circles Negotiating with NATO

HOVHANNES HOVHANNISIAN: ARMENIA’S HIGHEST POLITICAL CIRCLES NEGOTIATING WITH
NATO

Azg/Arm
4 Nov 04

NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer will arrive in Yerevan on
November 5. Hovhannes Hovhannisian, president of the Liberal
Progressive Party, known for his pro-NATO views gave an interview to
Azg Daily days before thevisit.

– NATO seems to be expanding to the East, and some view this as an
expansion against Russia.

– I wouldn’t say so. At the Istanbul summit of 2003 NATO made it clear
that it has plans concerning the three South Caucasian states and will
do everything to reach a high level of relationships.

NATO’s expansion is directed at reaching peace and stability
withinNATO and the world in general. NATO considers 3 Caucasian states
as potential candidates of the Treaty.

– Does it mean we can come closer to NATO without tearing off with
Russia?

– Many powerful NATO states such as Italy and Germany maintain good
relations with Russia. Do you think that we need to be a vassal
country to be on good terms with Russia?

– Do you approve of a complementary policy?

– Any far-sighted geo-policy has the elements of complementarism but
this is not the case. We often forget that Russia is not an axis
anymore, we should treat it as a neighboring European state. The
former totalitarian country vanished away long ago. The steps we take
in the foreign policy should consider development of our own state.

– Still, what does Armenia think of getting involved in a common
structure with Azerbaijan?

– If we coexisted alongside Azerbaijan in the Soviet Union why can’t
we do the same in the structure of NATO?

– Last events within the frameworks of Cooperation for Peace
Initiative do not promise a hopeful future.

– I am sure that the 3 Caucasian states should join the NATO
simultaneously. It is the guarantee for a lasting peaceful
coexistence for them. And the war-battered region will get the chance
of settling its conflicts.

– In his recent interview to Mediamax news agency NATO Secretary
General said that he sees readiness of deepening relations with NATO
in Armenia. What parties (organizations) besides yours support NATO in
Armenia?

– The Ministry of Defense and highest political circles of the country
are negotiating with NATO.

– Will you meet the Secretary General during his visit in Armenia?

– I knew the former Secretary well enough but have never met with the
new one. Our meeting depends on his willingness.

By Karine Danielian