Academician Aghanbegian Calls On To Curb Inflation

ACADEMICIAN AGHANBEGIAN CALLS ON TO CURB INFLATION

Noyan Tapan
Feb 17, 2009

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 17, NOYAN TAPAN. Overcoming the global financial
and economic crisis is a difficult and long process, and any
factors to promote growth of the global economy are not visible
so far, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Abel
Aghanbegian expressed an opinion at a round table on anti-crisis
management. According to him, the crisis is likely to enter a stage of
stagnation (the absence of economic growth), and a painful stagflation
– inflation under conditions of the absence of economic growth awaits
those countries that will not curb inflation in 2009-2010. A.

Aghanbegian attached importance to conducting a correct policy on
the Armenian dram with respect to foreign currencies in conditions
of curbing the inflation.

In his words, the crisis has invaded Russia in 5 directions and left
quite a serious impact on its economy. In particular, the turnover
on the Russian stock exchange has declined 4 times, and a liquidity
crisis has began as the conditions of credit provision to companies
have worsened.

Besides, as a result of the expected fall in prices of oil, metals
and gas, Russia’s exports will decline by about 100 billion USD,
while the state budget will have a deficit of 1.5-2% of GDP instead
of the previous surplus of 6% of GDP.

In parallel with the fall in prices of exported goods, the foreign
demand has declined as well, followed by a decline in the absolute
volumes of industrial production, construction and investments.

50% appreciation of the dollar against the Russian ruble has encouraged
the local production. At the same time the foreign reserves of the
country have decreased from 597 billion USD to 300 billion USD as
the Central Bank of Russia has allocated considerable resources to
control the panic moods caused by the dollar’s appreciation.

Academician Aghanbegian said that some crisis phenomena are more deeply
perceived in Russia than in the US, big European countries and China.

Deputies of the RA National Assembly, experts, and representatives
of the business community took part in the discussion on the subject
"Anti-Crisis Management in Current Conditions. Problems and Solutions"
organized by the Higher School of Corporate Management of the Republic
of Armenia.

According to analyst Vahram Ghushchian, the crisis in Russia may have
a considerable impact on Armenia because remittances of the annual
amount of 1.4 billion USD from Russia to Armenia may decline.

He underlined the importance of implementing the North-South
railway-motor way construction project in terms of job creation.

The Executive Director of the Republican Union of Employers Gagik
Makarian spoke about the necessity of measures for business development
and improvement of the business environment. In particular, he
proposed taking steps to create a united business database, ensure
the accessibility of financial resources, reduce bureaucratism and
red tape, and increase state assistance.

In the opinion of G. Makarian, the reduction of the current 20% rate
of VAT and the social payments for salaries of up to 100 thousand
drams will help improve the competitiveness of Armenian producers,
keep the current jobs and create new ones.

RA MFA: Bryza’s statements hamper Karabakh talks

PanARMENIAN.Net

RA MFA: Bryza’s statements hamper Karabakh talks
14.02.2009 11:38 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The statements made from time to time by OSCE
U.S. Co-chair Matthew Bryza are incomprehensible, the RA Foreign
Ministry said.

`These statements can nothing but hamper the peace process, which
bases on Madrid proposals envisaging three fundamental principles of
resolution of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict: non-use of force, the
right of nations to self-determination and the principle of
territorial integrity,’ said Tigran Balayan, head of the Ministry’s
media relations division.

`Armenia has numerously states that the resolution of the Karabakh
conflict should base on recognition of the NKR people’s right to
self-determination and independence. Talks are underway. No agreement
has been reached thus far. And it’s premature to speak of any now,’
Balayan commented.

In an interview with Voice of America, Ambassador Bryza said
resolution of the Karabakh conflict is not far away and that it’s
based on the principle of territorial integrity. `The right of
nation’s to self-determination and inadmissibility of use of force
should also be fixed in the agreement,’ he said.

Turkey Needs Consolidation Of Political And Economic Ties With Her N

TURKEY NEEDS CONSOLIDATION OF POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC TIES WITH HER NORTHERN NEIGHBOUR
Karine Ter-Sahakyan

PanARMENIAN.Net
12.02.2009 GMT+04:00

Energy carriers purchase accounts for the considerable part of
commodity circulation of Turkey and Russia: 2/3 of natural gas and
1/3 of oil Turkey imports from Russia.

Turkish President’s latest visit to Moscow was in June 2006 by
then president Ahmet Necdet Sezer. It should be noted that Turkish
presidents do not usually travel around the world; this advantage is
often taken by country’s prime-ministers. On the whole, the president’s
post has more representative functions in Turkey, but the situation
changed with the Islamists coming to power.

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ As usual, international visits are paid by the
Prime-Minister, but President Abdullah Gul carries out rather an active
international policy too. Possibly, the reason is that current Turkish
President long occupied the position of the country’s foreign minister.

In the light of changing geopolitical situation the visit of Abdullah
Gul to Moscow is of great significance. Turkey needs consolidation
of political and economic ties with her northern neighbour, which
is also on allied terms with Armenia. Ankara realizes it best that
neither regulation of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict nor normalization
of Armenian-Turkish relations is possible without Russia. Though
hardly anything can Moscow do in relation to the Armenian-Turkish
relations, it is only for the time being. In his interview to the
Russian program "Vesti" the President of Turkey underlined Russia’s key
role in peaceful resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. "Turkey
hails the trilateral meeting of Moscow between the Russian, Armenian
and Azerbaijani Presidents in December 2008, at the end of which a
declaration was signed on peaceful resolution of the conflict. We
consider that Russia, as the OSCE Minsk Group Co-chair on Nagorno
Karabakh, has a key role in this matter," Gul said.

In the words of the Turkish President, Ankara has long been seeking
ways to normalize relations with neighboring Armenia and has seized
every opportunity of a dialogue. "The World Cup qualifier between our
teams offered us a wonderful opportunity. I paid a visit to Yerevan
then and watched the match with my Armenian counterpart. After
the match we had an excellent and effective meeting with President
Sargsyan. I am happy that the dialogue we opened in Yerevan is going
on," Gul noted.

In this connection it should be noted that any step by Ankara towards
normalization of relations with Armenia is perceived rather nervously
by Azerbaijan, and the visit to Moscow was not an exception. Baku
won’t understand that brotherhood is good but personal interests
are more important. And if today Ankara needs intimacy with Armenia,
she can easily leave Azerbaijan aside. This is what we are gradually
coming to, and various statements of Azeri political scientists on
the conduct of Turkish officials, as well as the Turkish diplomats’
promises that Ankara will never leave Baku face to face with the
Karabakh issue pursue one goal – to mentally prepare the Azeri people
that Turkey Â"swindledÂ" them not only in the Karabakh issue but also
in transportation of energy carriers. And for Baku it is much more
serious than simply politics.

Another issue to be discussed in Moscow is the Caucasus Platform
of Stability and Cooperation posed by Turkish Prime-Minister
Erdogan. However, its implementation looks rather vague because of
Iran’s non-participation in it. Moreover, there are rumours that Iran
might put forth a similar proposal too.

The economic, or to be more precise, the energy constituent is
most significant in Moscow meetings. As Gul states, energy carriers
purchase accounts for the considerable part of commodity circulation of
Turkey and Russia: 2/3 of natural gas and 1/3 of oil Turkey imports
from Russia. Most likely, Moscow meetings will also dwell on the
project "Blue stream-2" that would allow southerly delivery of the
Russian gas through Turkey. First and foremost this means Turkey may
decline from the project Nabucco if the transit from Russia is more
profitable than, say from Azerbaijan or Turkmenistan. Remember that
the pipeline "Blue stream" was built in the shortest possible time
and functions successfully, contrary to the expectations of some
skeptics who believed it was impossible to transport gas through
the seabed of the Black Sea. It was especially thanks to the "Blue
stream" that Turkey suffered slightest losses during the "gas war"
between Russia and Ukraine. As for the delivery of gas from Russia to
Turkey, in 2009 it will probably amount to 25.5 billion cubic meters,
i.e. 1.7 billion cubic meters more than in 2008. Most likely RF will
also take part in the construction of Turkish atomic power plants,
which has been under discussion still since last year.

Turkish President’s visit to RF is somewhat directed against the
USA and Israel, especially after Erdogan’s ‘trick’ in Davos. The
new administration of the White House is too busy with the economic
crisis to listen to Turkey’s Â"threatsÂ" about cooling US-Turkish
relations. Roughly speaking, Barak Obama has neither time nor
the nerves to deal with it. He is trying to save the USA from
the crisis, withdraw part of his troops from Iraq and come to an
agreement with Moscow. Against this background Turkish statements
on the Â"undesirability and inadmissibilityÂ" of recognition of the
Armenian Genocide by the US Congress simply look naïve. It’s worth
mentioning that the RF State Duma recognized the Armenian Genocide
still in 1995 but Russian-Turkish relations did not suffer a bit,
similar to the French-Turkish relations. The only difference is that
Bush Administration was rather vulnerable and the Turkish Government
seized the opportunity.

Turkey Is Not A Mediator

TURKEY IS NOT A MEDIATOR

AZG Armenian Daily
13/02/2009

Karabakh conflict

To the question of ITAR-TASS news agency, "How will you comment on the
"Hurriet" newspaper news about an agreement on a solution plan for the
Karabakh conflict?" Head of the Department for Mass Media Relations
of RA FM press service Tigran Balayan answered, "The negotiations of
Karabakh issue are not conducted under Turkish mediation. Armenian
Foreign Minster Edward Nalbandian mentioned repeatedly that the
negotiations of Nagorno Karabakh conflict settlement are conducted
under the mediation of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-chairs on the basis
of Madrid Principles".

Science-Intensive Economy End Of Armenia’s Economic Development

SCIENCE-INTENSIVE ECONOMY END OF ARMENIA’S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

ARKA
Feb 11, 2009

YEREVAN, February 11. /ARKA/. The ultimate aim of Armenia’s economic
development is the formation of science-intensive economy, RA Minister
of Economy Nerses Yeritsyan stated at his meeting with students of
Yerevan State University.

Referring to international criteria, the Minister said that
science-intensive economy implies emphasis on laboratories, research,
education and financial infrastructures.

"If the infrastructures are integrated and constitute a critical share
in a country’s GDP, this country can be said to have science-intensive
economy," the Minister said.

Yeritsyan pointed out the necessity for highly skilled specialists
capable of advancing their own initiatives, and the Government will
be able to facilitate their development and attract large-scale
investments.

The Minister urged the students to advance their initiatives and
gain experience.

"One person’s initiative is tantamount to dozens of laws, and
entrepreneurial people make laws effective, which facilitates their
cooperation," Yeritsyan said.

In Turkish Parliamentarian’s Affirmation, Campaign I Apologize To Ar

IN TURKISH PARLIAMENTARIAN’S AFFIRMATION, CAMPAIGN I APOLOGIZE TO ARMENIANS IS SPONSORED BY EUROPEAN UNION

Noyan Tapan

Feb 10, 2009

BAKU, FEBRUARY 10, NOYAN TAPAN. Some initiators of the campaign I
Apologize to the Armenians launched in Turkey have received big sums
from European Union funds. According to the Merkez newspaper published
in Azerbaijan, deputy of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey,
member of the Nationalist Movement party Behic Celik stated this.

According to the Azeri newspaper, the Turkish parliamentarian stated
that the campaign I Apologize to the Armenians started in Turkey
by European Union’s order, and those conducting the campaign have
received big sums from European funds.

Thus, according to Behic Celik, among campaign initiators, Ahmed Insel,
Halil Berktay, Murad Belge, Serafettin Elci, Mehmed Ali Birand have
received 107 414 euros each, journalist Mine Kerekkanat 70 thousand
euros, professor Ibrahim Kaboglu 193 548 euros, professor Atilla
Yayla 449 620 euros, Ertugrul Kurkrcu 809 414 euros.

Agos newspaper’s editor-in-chief Etyen Mahcupian has received the
biggest sum, 1m 32 thousand 921 euros, on the list of the names
mentioned by the Turkish deputy.

"The above mentioned people for the sums received by them carry out
online signature collection I Apologize to the Armenians and ensure
assistance of greater number of people to that campaign," the Turkish
deputy stated.

It should be mentioned that in 2008 December four Turkish
intellectuals, Basken Oran, Ahmed Insel, Cengiz Aktar, and Ali
Bayramoglu came up with the initiative I Apologize to the Armenians,
within the framework of which an online signature collection was
organized.

More than 28 thousand people assist to the campaign I Apologize
to the Armenians. A website I Expect Apology operates in Turkey to
counteract to this campaign. According to the latest data, the website
has collected more than 116 thousand signatures.

http://www.nt.am?shownews=1012026

ANKARA: The Importance Of Turkish-US Relations

THE IMPORTANCE OF TURKISH-US RELATIONS
by Yasin Dogan

Yeni Safak
Feb 5 2009
Turkey

We often see superficial approaches that disregard the importance and
the multiple dimensions of Turkish-US relations. Groups that raise
objections to the effect that "we may lose the United States" whenever
Turkey levels some criticism; those who think that the United States
would write off Turkey as soon as the Armenian and Jewish lobbies go
into action; and those who are looking for opportunities to bash the
United States fail to see the dimensions of the alliance between the
two countries. Those who raised a storm after the [ 1 March 2003]
authorization bill affair also made the same mistake. Any arguments
that the United States might favour the Kurds over Turkey in the
region or that it might be pressured by Israel to take a different
posture with regard to Turkey are largely dissociated from reality.

The alliance with the United States has always been very important
for Turkey. The role the United States has played in Turkey’s
Westernization process is no less than that played by Europe. Nor
was Turkey’s importance and value [for the United States] associated
with the Cold War period only. Those who thought that Turkey’s
importance would decline after the end of the Cold War and that the
[Turkish-US] alliance relationship would lose its significance were
proven wrong. Today, Turkey occupies a more important place than it
did in the past.

President Obama needs to analyse Turkey’s importance well and echo
this in his policies.

Think about it:

If President Obama went to any European, Balkan, or Middle Eastern
country today, how many issues would he have on his agenda? Which
of these issues would he discuss and how long would such a meeting
last? Most probably, the agenda items could be counted on the fingers
of one hand and most of them would be related to the expectations of
that country from the United States.

Now, if President Obama came to Turkey how many files would have in
his briefcase? How many items would he have on his agenda? How many of
these would be Turkish expectations and how many would be US requests?

Let us enumerate only those that come to our mind:

Turkey’s position and contributions to the expansion of NATO and its
new missions. Security of energy supplies. The role of Turkey and its
soldiers in Afghanistan. The role Turkey may assume with regard to
developments in Pakistan, the linkage between Afghanistan and Pakistan,
and Iran’s nuclear activities. Political balances in Iraq and the
participation of different sides in the process. What Turkey can do
as the United States withdraws its troops from Iraq. The roles Turkey
may assume after the US withdrawal is completed. Northern Iraq and
the PKK. Developments in the Balkans, Kosovo, and Bosnia. The Cyprus
problem. Relations with Armenia. Russia’s efforts to increase its
influence in the region. Developments in Georgia. Israel’s relations
with Syria, Palestine, and Pakistan. Turkish-Israeli relations. The
Lebanon problem. The roles the Organization of Islamic Conference
may assume in the coming period. The messages Turkey may send to the
Islamic world. Relations with the Turkic world (Central Asia and the
Caucasus). The EU and the European Security and Defence Policy. The
Darfur problem in Sudan. Turkey’s membership in the UN Security
Council. The improvement of the US image in Turkey and the region. The
G-20 and the global crisis. Work on the Alliance of Civilizations. The
spread of democracy, market economics, and Western institutions to
the Middle East and surrounding regions. Bilateral military, trade,
and economic relations. Investments by US companies.

Depending on circumstances one can add other items to these, but each
of these headings may be the primary item on the agenda.

Think about it: How many states in the world are linked to so many
issues and can play a role in such a large area? In my estimate,
no more than three to five countries can boast of such a broad area
of interest and influence.

The United States has an interest in every region of the world and
therefore would like to have Turkey’s contribution and support in
one way or another.

Naturally, Turkey also has scores of agenda items for which it needs
the contributions of the United States.

A relationship with so many dimensions requires strategic cooperation
and it would be impossible to write off such a relationship in one
fell swoop. There may be many issues on which Turkey may be adversely
affected, but there are just as many issues on which it can have a
positive influence.

Turkey is a key country for the activation of the vision Obama
articulated in his first speech.

This is why Turkish-US ties must not be viewed as an ordinary
relationship.

"Moscow Open" to continue

Panorama.am
14:33 07/02/2009

`MOSCOW OPEN’ TO CONTINUE

The seventh round of `Moscow Open’ tournament in conducted Moscow
finished. Armenian GM Rafael Vahanyan was defeated by Sergey Tivliakov
from the Netherlands. Currently Vahanyan has 5 points on his account.
Olympic champion Gabriel Sargsyan defeated Ivan Aldokhin. In the
eighth round Rafael Vahanyan will meet with Vitali Tseshovski and
Gabriel Sargsyan ` Rinat Jumabaev.

Source: Panorama.am

Arpi Vartanian Believes The US Will Recognize The Armenian Genocide

ARPI VARTANIAN BELIEVES THE US WILL RECOGNIZE THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE
Nvard Davtyan

"Radiolur"
04.02.2009 16:32

No resolution on the recognition of the Armenian Genocide has been
presented at the 111th Congress. However, it will be presented in the
near future, perhaps with some changes. The Armenian organizations are
working with Congressmen, the Congressional Caucus on Armenian Issues
and Obama Administration to have the Armenian Genocide recognized by
both Congress and the US Administration, Armenian Assembly of America
Country Director for Armenia and Karabakh Arpi Vartanian told a press
conference today.

The relations with other countries could affect the process, but Arpi
Vartanian believes that Obama will keep his promise.

Arpi Vartanian today quoted Obama as saying: "Joe Biden and I believe
that the Armenian Genocide is not an allegation, a personal opinion,
or a point of view, but rather a widely documented fact supported by
an overwhelming body of historical evidence.

Senior Armenian Police Official Shot Dead

SENIOR ARMENIAN POLICE OFFICIAL SHOT DEAD

Reuters
Feb 4 2009

YEREVAN, Feb 4 (Reuters) – Armenia’s deputy chief of police, a former
presidential aide, was shot dead late on Tuesday outside his home in
Yerevan, police said.

Colonel Gevorg Mheryan, 33, was shot three times in the head and
once in the body near the entrance to his 7th floor apartment shortly
before 8.30 p.m. (1630 GMT), a police statement said.

Mheryan was an aide to the president on judicial issues before being
appointed deputy chief of police in July 2008.

Local media reported that he also previously led a team monitoring
efforts to stamp out rampant corruption in the former Soviet republic.

The police statement said the country’s prosecutor-general, police
chief and security committee head had inspected the crime scene.

"The emergency services established that Mheryan died from bullets
to the head and body," the statement said.

"A criminal case has been launched and police are trying to track down
the person responsible." (Reporting by Hasmik Lazarian; writing by
Matt Robinson; editing by Dominic Evans)