Pashinyan’s upcoming resignation does not require immediate conversation with Putin, Peskov says

Panorama, Armenia
March 29 2021

"The decision of the Prime Minister of Armenia Nikola Pashinyan to resign in April does not require an immediate conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin," The Kremlin Spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told TASS news agency when asked to comment on the matter. 

To remind, Pashinyan announced about upcoming resignation on Sunday, saying he would resign next month while staying in office until snap parliamentary elections. 

"He [Pashinyan] would stay in charge of the Prime Minister's duties, so the decision that was announced does not require an immediate discussion," said Peskov, as quoted by the source. 

He added that the leaders of the two countries “communicated quite recently, and the contacts continue." 

Asbarez: GenEd Releases ‘Stages of Genocide’ Toolkit for High School Social Studies Teachers

April 2, 2021



The Genocide Education Project and Woven Teaching’s “Stages of Genocide: A Toolkit for Educators”

The Genocide Education Project, in partnership with Woven Teaching, offers a new resource for high school social studies educators: “Stages of Genocide: A Toolkit for Educators” – an instructional guide and lesson plans for teaching about genocide and its common stages, using the histories of six case studies: Armenian, Cambodian, Guatemalan, Holocaust, Native American, and Rwandan.

Studying genocide is a critical part of a student’s understanding of both history and of current events. Based on the “Ten Stages of Genocide” framework describing how societies engage in genocide, this interactive lesson plan provides an opportunity to explore multiple instances of mass atrocity, while recognizing their commonalities and differences, and encouraging reflection and discussion of personal and institutional responsibility, connecting these historical events to current events and to students’ lives.

“Stages of Genocide: A Toolkit for Educators” guides educators in setting up student groups to carry out team projects related to comparative evaluations of the six genocide case studies. The toolkit includes the readings on genocide and the historical summaries as well as student handouts, project instructions, group norms, roles, evaluations, key terms, and graphic organizer.

Classrooms Without Borders, GenEd, and Woven Teaching will provide a webinar introducing educators to the “Stages of Genocide” toolkit on Monday, April 19 from 3:30 to 5 p.m. Registration is now open.

The “Chinese model” of poverty reduction could eradicate it

Save

Share

 15:23,

YEREVAN, MARCH 31, ARMENPRESS. The Embassy of the People’s Republic of China in Armenia, with the information support of ARMENPRESS state news agency, has launched an online exhibition dedicated to poverty alleviation in China. It aims at introducing the “Chinese model” of eradicating poverty to the world.

In an interview to ARMENPRESS, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the People’s Republic of China to Armenia Fan Yong talked about the “Chinese model” of poverty reduction, the international cooperation over the matter and other issues.

 

– Your Excellency, thank you for this interview. Recently the Chinese embassy with the information support of ARMENPRESS launched the online exhibition dedicated to poverty alleviation in China. Please, present our readers the occasion of holding the exhibition.

Thank you for the opportunity to meet the readers of ARMENPRESS.

Not long ago, Chinese President Xi Jinping announced that China has secured a "complete victory" in its fight against poverty. Over the past eight years, the final 98.99 million impoverished rural residents living under the current poverty line have all been lifted out of poverty. All 832 impoverished counties and 128,000 villages in China have been removed from the poverty list. 28 ethnic minority groups with relatively small population have shaken off poverty collectively. It is indeed the first time that China has the success of eliminating extreme poverty. As the biggest developing country in the world, with the largest population, China has made marvelous and historical achievement of poverty reduction. And it has been done with several decades of continuous restless efforts and dedications.

Since late 2012, China has lifted 10 million people out of poverty every year, built or upgraded 1.1 million kilometers of rural roads, provided a reliable power supply to rural areas, and expanded fiber-optic internet access and 4G signal coverage to more than 98% of its poor villages. During the same period, some 25.68 million impoverished people from 7.9 million households have witnessed their houses renovated, and more than 9.6 million people have been relocated from impoverished areas.

 

Mr. Ambassador, this is such an astounding and monumental work. What is China’s secret of success in fighting poverty?

The leadership of the Communist Party of China, the People-centered approach, the political advantage of socialist system and strategy of targeted poverty alleviation are crucial to China’ victory.

The Party’s leadership has provided a solid political and organizational guarantee for China's poverty alleviation efforts. China upholds a people-centered philosophy of development and in-pursuing prosperity for all. Eradicating poverty, improving people’s living standards, and gradually achieving common prosperity is the essential requirement of the development with Chinese characteristics. Political advantage of socialist system can bring together the needed resources to accomplish great tasks. A total of 255,000 teams were dispatched to offer on-the-ground support and over 3 million people were sent to the countryside as special commissioners for poverty relief. About 246 billion U.S. dollars of fiscal funds have been invested into poverty alleviation over the past eight years.

– China has succeeded in developing a model of overcoming poverty which includes economic development and raising the people’s welfare. Is China ready to share its experience and contribute to the global development of fighting poverty?

 

With absolute poverty eliminated, China has made great historical achievements. Since the beginning of the reform and opening-up over 40 years ago, China has lifted 770 million rural residents out of poverty which accounts for more than 70% of the global total, according to the World Bank's international poverty line. China has met the poverty eradication target set out in the United Nations' 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development 10 years ahead of schedule.

China has actively participated in international cooperation on poverty reduction through multilateral and bilateral channels. The Belt and Road Initiative that China proposed is expected to lift 7.6 million people out of absolute poverty and 32 million out of moderate poverty in the related countries.

 

– Mr. Ambassador, how do you see the prospects of cooperation with Armenia in this context?

While committed to eliminating poverty at home, China has actively participated in international cooperation on poverty reduction. China helped other developing countries break development bottlenecks as part of international development cooperation. In Asia, China and ASEAN countries have jointly launched a rural poverty reduction program. In Africa, China has helped African countries build water conservancy infrastructure, set up demonstration zones for agricultural cooperation, and carried out cooperation projects on China-Africa fungus production technology. China has also carried out technical cooperation assistance projects in infrastructure, agriculture and medical care in the South Pacific region and Latin America.

Poverty alleviation philosophies with Chinese characteristics, such as "targeted poverty reduction", are drawing more and more attention from the international community. We wish to share our success and experience with our Armenian friends. With the help of ARMENPRESS, we host the online-exhibition of Poverty alleviation in China, and we hope this exhibition may bring some help in fighting against poverty.

Armenian FM to attend CIS Foreign Ministerial Council session in Moscow

Save

Share

 16:54,

YEREVAN, MARCH 30, ARMENPRESS. The delegation led by Foreign Minister of Armenia Ara Aivazian will depart for Moscow, Russia, on April 1 to take part in the session of the CIS Council of Foreign Ministers, the Armenian foreign ministry told Armenpress.

The FM is expected to meet with a number of partners on the sidelines of the session.

 

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

Petition to disqualify Azerbaijani participant from Eurovision 2021 hits around 5,000 signatures

Panorama, Armenia
March 23 2021

A petition, demanding the  European Broadcasting Union ("EBU") to cancel Azerbaijani artist Efendi from Eurovision 2021 was launched on Change.org platform. According to the text of the petition the Azerbaijan's representative for 2021, Efendi, has promoted and taken part in hateful speech, discrimination and encouraged killing of Armenians through use of social media posts, tags, and by participating in state sponsored events. "She has posted images of herself wearing military uniform calling all Azerbaijanis to fight against Armenians, sharing taglines calling Armenians "te**orists", and making a mockery of thousands of Armenians who were displaced as a result of Azeri aggression. Efendi openly praises Azerbaijan's leadership which ranks 168 out of 180 in freedom of speech," the source said. 

The statement reminds that Ictimai Television ("ITV"), the Azeri broadcaster that is EBU member is affiliated and sponsored by the Azeri government. The broadcaster has in the past violated numerous EBU rules, yet has not faced disbarment of its membership from the EBU. In 2009, ITV cooperated with the Azeri government to provide the phone numbers of the Azerbaijani civilians who had voted for Armenia. Those individuals were detained, interrogated or threatened by Azerbaijani National Security Ministry. In 2013, online videos surfaced showing Azeri representative attempting to recruit through bribery individuals in other European countries to vote for the Azeri entrant. In 2017, the five-member Azerbaijani juries unanimously ranked the Armenian entrant last and ranked the Cypriot entrant with an Armenian background second to last. EBU has taken no affirmative actions against ITV in the past for these violations.

It is noted that that ESC is a non-political music festival intended to unite European countries through music. According to EBU rules, participating broadcasters shall at all times respect ESC values and ensure no country is discriminated or ridiculed in any manner. "By allowing Efendi to participate in this year's contest, EBU validates, encourages and affiliates itself with an artist who has spread hateful speech against Armenians," the petition added which has collected around 5,000 signatures as of Tuesday morning. 

Armenia’s Postwar Crisis: What to Know | Council on Foreign Relations

Council on Foreign Relations

Armenia’s Postwar Crisis: What to Know

By Célestine Bohlen, CFR Expert

12:00 pm (EST)

Armenia has been riven by disputes over its leadership since its military defeat by Azerbaijan last fall. Newly called elections are unlikely to reconcile the divisions in Armenian society caused by the battlefield losses.

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has called for early elections after weeks of protests and a standoff with his own army. What’s going on?

Pashinyan, Armenia’s forty-five-year-old prime minister who was elected in 2018 on the back of a so-called Velvet Revolution, is banking on early elections set for June 20 to quell a political crisis that has its roots in Armenia’s bitter defeat in a forty-four-day war with neighboring Azerbaijan last year.Pashinyan himself triggered the crisis on February 23, when he suggested in a TV interview that Iskander missiles provided to Armenia by Russia had underperformed during the war. When a senior military official scoffed at these remarks, Pashinyan fired the official, only to find himself publicly challenged by the chief of the general staff and some forty top military officers, all of whom demanded his resignation.

Defying what he called a military “coup d’état,” Pashinyan summoned his supporters to the streets of the capital, Yerevan, to face off against demonstrators calling for his ouster. The rival protests came to a head on March 9, when the opposition—a coalition of sixteen parties— barricaded the parliament building.

The debate about the performance of the Russian missiles was beside the point. (Moscow denied they were even used.) The main issue is Pashinyan’s leadership during the war and his continued defense of the tripartite cease-fire agreement brokered by Russia. That deal forced Armenia to cede Azerbaijani territory seized almost thirty years ago, after the first war over the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh.

People attend a rally organized by supporters of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan in Republic Square in Yerevan. Hayk Baghdasaryan/Photolure/Reuters
Share

Major opposition parties signed off on Pashinyan’s March 18 announcement of early elections, but some minor parties vowed to continue their protests, pressing for the formation of an interim government ahead of the balloting in June.  

What is at stake if the country’s political crisis continues?

Prolonged instability in Armenia could endanger the fragile truce that went into effect on November 10. Even if Pashinyan’s government survives the June elections, his authority has been damaged, and opposition to the truce negotiated last November remains high.

Already, much about the peace settlement remains unclear. The mandate for Russia’s 1,960 peacekeepers is still undefined; so is the status of Nagorno-Karabakh, the ethnic-Armenian-majority region whose self-declared independence remains tenuous.

The Russian troops deployed as part of the deal have generally been welcomed by Armenians, but their presence has raised concerns in Azerbaijan, given the checkered history of forces Russia has deployed as “peacekeepers” in other regional conflicts, such as in neighboring Georgia. Russia backed separatist forces in the Georgian regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia in the early 1990s and continues to hold sway over those regions.

Tensions in the Nagorno-Karabakh region peaked again in recent weeks as both Armenia and Azerbaijan announced on relatively short notice that they were conducting large-scale military exercises.

Why are Armenia and Azerbaijan in conflict?

The first war over the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh began in 1991 as the Soviet Union was collapsing. Armenia then launched a military operation to take control of a region that historically had been home to an ethnic Armenian population living within the Soviet republic of Azerbaijan.

The victorious Armenian army not only liberated the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh, but also occupied seven surrounding Azerbaijani districts as a buffer zone. The land grab led to an exodus of some 250,000 Azerbaijanis, whose displacement remained a festering wound for the next three decades.

Last November, after Azerbaijani forces overwhelmed the Armenian military with help from drones provided by its ally Turkey, Azerbaijan took back the seven districts, plus one-third of the so-called Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh.

Has Russia gained influence over Armenia and the region since brokering the peace deal?

Russia has been widely credited with bringing last year’s war to an end, an achievement that will allow it to keep its peacekeepers in the region for at least five years. This has assured Moscow a major role in the region’s future, likely at the expense of France and the United States, Russia’s partners in decades-long efforts to negotiate peace through a forum known as the Minsk Group of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.

But Russia now has to maintain a delicate balance in its relations with both Armenia and Azerbaijan, a difficult task given that the status of Nagorno-Karabakh remains unresolved. And although Moscow’s influence has increased, so too has its vulnerability because of the position of its peacekeepers, who are in both Armenia-controlled Nagorno-Karabakh and the critical Lachin Corridor, now back under Azerbaijani control, that links the disputed region with Armenia.

Russia has had cool-but-correct relations with Pashinyan since 2018, when he led a peaceful movement that ousted a Moscow-friendly government. Pashinyan has also steered a calibrated “multi-vector” foreign policy, seeking cooperation with Europe and the United States while avoiding any challenge to Russia, which remains Armenia’s major military ally.

Art: After Losing Her Daughter in the Beirut Explosions, a Lebanese-Armenian Gallerist Launches a New Creative Platform in Her Memory

ArtNet

The online platform that Gaïa Fodoulian began is launching with Beirut's first large-scale show of Lebanese artists since the explosions.

Gaïa Fodoulian and Annie Vartivarian, photo courtesy AD Leb.

At 3:31 p.m. on August 4, 2020, less than three hours before the Beirut explosions took the life of 29-year-old cultural producer Gaïa Fodoulian, she posted a picture of herself on Facebook wearing a red dress running through the woods. In the caption, she wrote, “Everyone is the creator of one’s own faith.” 

It was rare for Fodoulian to turn the camera on herself, according to her mother, Annie Vartivarian. “She was more apt to post pictures of art, design, and nature, but for some reason on that day, a few hours before she died, she posted this picture as if she knew what was going to happen,” Vartivarian told Artnet News from Beirut. “Gaïa was always very intuitive.” 

A screen shot of Gaïa Fodoulian’s final Facebook post. Photo: courtesy of Annie Vartivarian.

On that Tuesday, the mother and daughter had spent the day together, having just returned home when the first explosion hit. “We stood next to each other watching the smoke from the window,” Vartivarian recalled. As the second explosion erupted seconds later, they ran in opposite directions seeking cover. When Vartivarian returned from the kitchen, she found her daughter lying on the floor. They rushed to the hospital, but couldn’t find any help in the midst of all the carnage and chaos. Fodoulian passed away from internal bleeding.

Eight months after her death, against the backdrop of a city still struggling to emerge from the rubble, Vartivarian plans to carry on her daughter’s legacy with AD Leb, which stands for Art Design Lebanon, a new online platform that Fodoulian was developing when she died. It will function as a virtual art gallery, showcasing works predominantly by artists from Lebanon as well as the wider Middle East and around the world. 

Vartivarian, a short woman of immense presence and determination, finished the project while wrestling with her own grief and the aftershock of losing not just Fodoulian but her city. Vartivarian also runs Laetitia Gallery in Beirut, which showcases works by emerging and established Lebanese and international artists. 

The outside of the Tabbal Building, Courtesy of AD Leb, 2021. Photo: Vartan Seraydarian.

The new platform, which launches April 3, will kick off with an IRL show titled “Everyone is the creator of one’s own faith,” after the last words written by Fodoulian on her Instagram. It represents the first large-scale group exhibition held in Beirut since the explosions. 

The exhibition will occupy the empty spaces of the historic Tabbal building on Sursock Street, which dates to the 1890s, in downtown Beirut. The participating artists are mostly from Lebanon with a few from the greater Middle East, including Samer Bou Rjeily, Karen Chekerdjian, Hatem Imam, and Caroline Tabet. A 3-D video of the exhibition will also be accessible on the digital platform.  

The launch of the gallery is one of few signs of life in a Lebanese art scene. The country remains at a political impasse as squabbling between Prime Minister designate Saad Hariri and President Michel Aoun continues over the formation of a new government. Every day, the Lebanese watch as their currency collapses further and further. Inflation has skyrocketed as the US dollar exceeded the 15,000 Lebanese lira threshold. Fights have broken out at supermarkets for food and essential items.

Sirine Fattouh, Arab Artist (2019). Courtesy of AD Leb.

In the past several months, thousands of Lebanese have left their country, many moving to nearby Dubai or France. As for the creative industry, a majority of artists are relocating their studios and staging exhibitions abroad. Vartivarian’s soon-to-open exhibition will be staged amidst this rising sea of chaos. 

“Gaïa would have wanted to help keep the creative scene of her country alive,” Vartivarian said. “We continue to live in great hardship in Lebanon. The situation has gotten worse, but people still express themselves through art. They try and channel their fears, their trauma, and their hopes through creative means.”

Karen Chekerdjian, Totem in Marble (2019). Courtesy of AD Leb.

The empty spaces of the old Tabbal building are a befitting setting for the show, especially in this moment of struggle. The Mediterranean light that trickles through the arched windows illuminates the historical building and offers a reminder of Lebanon’s rich historical past. 

“Art is important at all times—during times of war and crisis,” said artist Sirine Fattouh, who is presenting three works in the show. “Even during the times we are living in Lebanon now, we cannot live without art. It is our oxygen.”

 

“Everyone is the creator of one’s own faith” runs from April 3–24 at the Tabbal Building on Sursock Street in Beirut, Lebanon.

Latvian artists call on Azerbaijan to speed up exchange of bodies, PoWs and hostages

Save

Share

 17:54,

YEREVAN, MARCH 17, ARMENPRESS. Prominent artists, intellectuals and culture professionals of Latvia have made a statement, appealing to Azerbaijan to speed up the exchange of bodies, prisoners of war, and hostages and their return to Armenia, ARMENPRESS was informed from the Embassy of Armenia in Lithuania, Litvia and Estonia.

The announcement particularly says:

''We, artists, intellectuals and culture professionals of the Republic of Latvia, professing our belief in the importance of humane values and joining the initiative of our Lithuanian colleagues, appeal to the authorities of Azerbaijan not to hinder the immediate return to the Republic of Armenia of prisoners of war (PoW) and other detainees, as well as the bodies of the soldiers killed in action and perished during the recent Karabakh war. According to our information, Armenia has already returned to Azerbaijan all PoWs.

We are certain that the unconditional and immediate return of all PoWs is one of the first steps necessary for the renewal of mutual trust between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia.

We call the international community to join this humanitarian initiative thus helping overcome the humanitarian disaster in Nagorno Karabakh (Artsakh) caused by the recent war.”

The statement has been signed by

  • Viktors Avotiņš – poet, publicist
  • Ināra Beļinkaja – president of the Booksellers Association, director of the company “Jānis Roze”, recipient of the order the Cross of Recognition
  • Dana Bjorka – actress, theatre director, director of the Mikhail Chekhov • Riga Russian theatre
  • Inguna Cepīte – writer, publisher
  • Diāna Dimza Dimme – artist, curator at the Latvian National Museum of Art
  • Ina Druviete ‒ professor of the University of Latvia
  • Andris Freibergs – stage designer, educator
  • Lauris Gundars – screenwriter, playwright, theatre director, educator
  • Rafi Haradžanjans – dr. art., recipient of the Order of the Three Stars
  • Alvis Hermanis – opera and theatre director, director of the New Riga Theatre
  • Nora Ikstena ‒ writer, recipient of the Order of the Three Stars
  • Ilze Jaunalksne-Rēdere – journalist
  • Viesturs Kairišs – film, opera and theatre director
  • Rēzija Kalniņa ‒ actress, theatre director
  • Andris Kalnozols – writer, theatre director, actor
  • Aiks Karapetjans – film and opera director
  • Agrita Kiopa – Vice-Rector for Science of the Riga Stradina University
  • Marina Kosteņecka – writer, recipient of the Order of the Three Stars
  • Pēteris Krilovs – film and theatre director, educator
  • Rolands Kronlaks – chairman of the board of the Latvian Composers Union
  • Maija Kūle ‒ dr. habil. phil., philosopher, member of the Latvian Academy of Sciences, Commander of the Order of the Three Stars
  • Zigmars Liepiņš – composer, chairman of the board of the Latvian National Opera (2013-2019), recipient of the Order of the Three Stars
  • Andra Manfelde ‒ writer
  • Evija Martinsone – opera singer
  • Arturs Maskats – composer
  • Agnese Meiere – journalist
  • Juris Millers – Dr. philol., producer
  • Jānis Nords – film director
  • Karine Paronjanca – painter
  • Kristīne Pasternaka – costume designer
  • Georgs Pelēcis – composer, professor of the Jāzeps Vītols Latvian Academy of Music
  • Juris Poškus – film director, screenwriter
  • Elena Privalova – organist, musicologist
  • Ainārs Roze – Dr. oec, chairman of the company “Jānis Roze” un "Jāņa Rozes apgāds"
  • Kristians Rozenvalds – public relations specialist
  • Ainārs Rubiķis ‒ conductor, music director of the Komische Oper Berlin
  • Dāvis Sīmanis – film director, educator
  • Ojārs Spārītis ‒ vice president of the Latvian Academy of Sciences
  • Inga Spriņģe – journalist
  • Andris Sprūds – director of the Latvian Institute of International Affairs
  • Baiba Strautmane – journalist
  • Babken Stepanjans – painter
  • Reinis Suhanovs – stage designer, theatre director
  • Oļegs Šapošņikovs ‒ theatre director, director of the Daugavpils theatre
  • Andrejs Šavrejs ‒ journalist
  • Gatis Šmits – film and theatre director
  • Horen Stalbe – musician
  • Leons Taivans ‒ profesor of the University of Latvia
  • Sonora Vaice – opera singer
  • Pēteris Vasks ‒ composer
  • Andris Veismanis – conductor
  • Dace Vīgante ‒ writer
  • Māra Zālīte – writer, honorary member of the Latvian Academy of Sciences

Release and return of POWs is an internationally mandated requirement – Armenia Ombudsman

Save

Share

 10:06,

YEREVAN, MARCH 16, ARMENPRESS. Human Rights Defender of Armenia Arman Tatoyan commented on the statements made by Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Jeyhun Bayramov on March 15 at the meeting with the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office.

Armenpress presents the Ombudsman’s comment:

“At a press conference pertaining to the meeting with the OSCE Chairman-in-Office, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan stated: "Azerbaijan has returned all the captives to Armenia in accordance with its obligations." The statement said that "on November 26, armed men from the Shirak province of Armenia (…) are not prisoners of war." These statements of the Azerbaijani authorities are made regularly.

Considering that the issue concerns the protection of the rights of Armenian servicemen and civilians held captive in Azerbaijan and the fact that distorted presentation of facts to international organizations should not be allowed, Armenia’s Human Rights Defender considers it necessary to address the referenced statements in detail.

  1. Both before and after the November 9 announcement, there is an ongoing armed conflict on the ground.

This conclusion follows directly from international humanitarian law, in as much as all servicemen and civilians of the Armenian side detained in Azerbaijan are prisoners of war are subject to be protected by international law, and they must be immediately released and returned safely.

  1. The release and return of prisoners of war is a mandatory international requirement, not an act of “goodwill" or "kindness" of the Azerbaijani authorities.

This requirement applies in international law, regardless of whether it is enshrined in specific conflict resolution documents, and must be met without preconditions.

  1. The behavior and statements of the Azerbaijani authorities, at a minimum, attest to the following:

1) they artificially delay the release and return of the Armenian captives;

2) abuse legal procedures, falsify the requirements of international law, prosecute prisoners, and use deprivation of liberty as punishment;

The special report of the RA Human Rights Defender proves with concrete examples that this practice grossly violates international human rights requirements (https://ombuds.am/…/1138b156720bec6ae0fd88dc709eb62c.pdf);

3) they use the issue for political purposes. This refers, for example, to reports in the independent media that the Azerbaijani authorities are using the issue of the return of prisoners for the exchange of territories in Artsakh, bargaining and other political purposes.

4) they abuse Clause 8 of the tripartite declaration of November 9, 2020 as it relates to the return of captives, and they link it to other points in the declaration, clearly taking advantage of the fact that it does not specify the date of fulfillment of that obligation.

5) they deliberately cause continuous mental suffering to the families of captives and missing persons, and hey blatantly toy with the feelings of the Armenia and Artsakh societies;

6) they create public tension in Armenia and Artsakh with their behavior;

7) they do not publish the true number of captives of the Armenian side held in Azerbaijan, and do so without any legal grounds and in gross violation of human rights requirements.

  1. Consequently, calling any of the Armenian servicemen and civilians captured by the Azerbaijani armed forces "terrorists" is a gross violation of international humanitarian law and international human rights law in general.

This assertion is particularly relevant given the requirements of the Third Geneva Convention of 1949.

  1. The statements of the President of Azerbaijan and the Minister of Foreign Affairs about the captives directly contradict the intentions of the signatory parties to the tripartite statement of November 9, 2020 and the practical application of that announcement.

In particular, based on the requirement of clause 8 of that statement, the Republic of Armenia has already transferred to Azerbaijan perpetrators of crimes in Artsakh, including two convicted Azerbaijani murderers of Armenian civilians. Azerbaijan handed over Armenians formally convicted in that country on the same principle.

Moreover, there took place a return of captives after the November 9 trilateral announcement.

  1. Therefore, the said statement should be applied to all situations arising from before as well as after November 9, and so long as there is an objective need for the protection of human rights and the humanitarian process due to the aftermath of hostilities.

In principle, it is improper to condition the issue of prisoners based only on the date of the trilateral declaration.

We emphasize once again that, regardless of the date of captivity, all servicemen of the Armenian side held in Azerbaijan, including civilians, are prisoners of war by their current status.

Such a mechanical approach is unacceptable.

  1. In addition to the foregoing, the credible evidence collected by the Human Rights Defender's Office of the Republic of Armenia confirms that the number of detainees is higher than confirmed by the Azerbaijani authorities. This assertion takes into account the return of 44 prisoners of war in a single group, including those captured during the hostilities prior to the November 9 tripartite declaration.

The Human Rights Defender has registered numerous cases when, despite the evidence confirmed by videos and other evidence, the Azerbaijani authorities deny the fact that those people are within their custody and control, or delay the approval and processing of their release.

  1. The absolute urgency of the issue of the release of prisoners should be considered in the context of the Azerbaijani state supported policy of hatred towards Armenians which has been repeatedly confirmed and based on objective evidence contained in the reports of Armenia’s Human Rights Defender.

This fact is confirmed by a number of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights.

  1. Therefore, the Human Rights Defender of the Republic of Armenia once again draws the attention of the international community and especially the international organizations with a mandate to protect human rights to the statement of the Azerbaijani authorities, and in this instance, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan.

It is necessary to ensure the absolute implementation of international humanitarian and human rights requirements and, immediate release and return of the captives of Armenian side without preconditions”.