Shushi Fund initiates Historic and Cultural Heritage Study of Shushi

HISTORIC AND CULTURAL HERITAGE OF SHUSHI FORTRESS-TOWN AND ITS
NEIGHBORHOOD STUDIED ON INITIATIVE OF SHUSHI FUND

YEREVAN, JUNE 21, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. The historic and
cultural heritage of Shushi fortress-town and its neighborhood has
been studied on the initiative of the Shushi fund since 2004. As Noyan
Tapan’s correspondent was informed by Bakur Karapetian, fund’s
Co-chairman, as a result of the studies more than 520 monuments,
residential and public structures built in 18-19 centuries were
registered in Shushi, as well as 200 tombs and traces of a Cyclop
castle were revealed. According to B.Karapetian, the research of
Shushi antiquities first of all has a historic goal. Before Shushi’s
liberation Armenian researchers had to content themselves only with
written sourcers in order to show the territory’s Armenian belonging
while today they can widely use numerous archeological, lithographic
and many other sources. According to Bakur Karapetian, the fund’s goal
is to support cultural development of Artsakh and Shushi fortress-town,
to restore the town of Shushi trying to retain the historic and
architectural look the town had before 1920 as far as possible and to
make the fortress-town, which has been constantly at war, a cultural
center. The fund also envisages to carry out study of archives
materials about Shushi as there are numerous archives materials about
the fortress-town kept in archives of Yerevan Museum of History, state
archives of Switzerland, Moscow and St Petersburg. According to Bakur
Karapetian, the archives documents will be published by separate
volumes and will be presented to the public. Probably, the first
volume will be ready by the end of the year.

AUA Graduate Selected as 2005 Yale World Fellow

American University of Armenia
Public Relations Office

PRESS RELEASE

June 15, 2005

American University of Armenia
40 Marshal Baghramian
Yerevan 375019 ARMENIA
Telephone: (37410) 512-522
Fax: (37410) 270-859; 512-512

Contact: Diana Manukyan
E-mail: [email protected]

AUA Graduate Selected as 2005 Yale World Fellow

Yerevan – Yale University President Richard Levin announced that Lusine
Abovyan, who is a graduate of the American University of Armenia’s Law
Department and who is currently an adjunct member of its law faculty, was
selected from among hundreds of qualified candidates to become one of 18
Yale World Fellows in 2005.

Yale World Fellows are selected from outside the US at an early mid-career
point, and come from a range of fields and disciplines, including
government, business, media, non-governmental organizations, the military,
religion and the arts.

Abovyan is a lawyer and journalist, and currently serves as a constitutional
law specialist for the Armenia Legislative Strengthening Program, an
organization charged with reforming the Armenian constitution. She earned
her Master of Laws (LL.M.) from AUA in 1999 and she has been an adjunct
member of the AUA law faculty since 2001, where she teaches Media Law and
Intellectual Property Law.

Matthew Karanian, the Associate Dean of the University’s law school, said
that Abovyan is a `shining star for Armenia, for AUA, and for the law
program,’ where she studied and now teaches. `We’re proud of her
accomplishment, and are pleased to know that someone who we have long
recognized as a leader in legal scholarship is now also being recognized by
Yale.’

Abovyan received her first degree in 1995 from Progress University of
Economy and Law in Gyumri, Armenia. She has also earned an LLM from Tulane
University in New
Orleans, LA, as a recipient of the Edmund Muskie/Freedom Support Act
Graduate Fellowship CEP SCOUT Fellow. Abovyan is a member of International
Media Lawyers Association, AUA Alumni Association, and American Graduates
Association.

—————————————-

The American University of Armenia is registered as a non-profit educational
organization in both Armenia and the United States and is affiliated with
the Regents of the University of California. Receiving major support from
the AGBU, AUA offers instruction leading to the Masters Degree in eight
graduate programs. For more information about AUA, visit

www.aua.am.

BAKU: Mediating countries not to send peacekeepers to Garabagh

Mediating countries not to send peacekeepers to Garabagh

Baku, June 20, AssA-Irada

Peacekeeping forces will be stationed in the conflict zone after
Azerbaijan and Armenia reach an accord on settling the Upper Garabagh
conflict, officials said.

`It has been agreed that co-chairing countries [France, United States
and Russia] will not be included in these forces’, according to Deputy
Foreign Minister Araz Azimov.

Azimov said the agreement on the issue was reached a while ago and
Russia agreed to this proposal. `The precise make-up of peacekeepers
will be determined as results are achieved in peace talks’, he said.*

Erdogan: Armenien-Beschluss “hassliches” Vorgehen

Stuttgarter Nachrichten
18. Juni 2005

Turkei greift Bundestag an;
Erdogan: Armenien-Beschluss “hassliches” Vorgehen

Berlin/Ankara (dpa) – Die vom Bundestag beschlossene Resolution zu
den Massakern an den Armeniern vor 90 Jahren im Osmanischen Reich
hat Verstimmungen zwischen Deutschland und der Turkei ausgelost.

Der turkische Regierungschef Recep Tayyip Erdogan sprach von einem
“hasslichen” Vorgehen.

Die Turkische Gemeinde in Deutschland warf dem Bundestag vor, er
sei der “Hasspropaganda” mancher armenischen Kreise erlegen. Die
Bundesregierung bezeichnete die Resolution als ausgewogen. Positiv
waren die Reaktionen in Armenien.

Erdogan erklarte, im Antragstext finde sich zwar nicht der Begriff
“Volkermord”, aber der Begriff “Massaker”. Er finde es politisch
sehr falsch, dass der Bundestag einfach Interessengruppen nachgebe,
ohne das Thema zu diskutieren.

Regierungssprecher Thomas Steg sagte, gerade die Deutschen wussten,
dass die Aufarbeitung historischer Schuld und die Bereitschaft zur
Versohnung und zum Verzeihen unverzichtbar seien, “um eine gute und
friedliche Zukunft der Volker zu gestalten”. Der Bundestag hatte
einem Antrag aller Fraktionen zugestimmt, der die Turkei zum Dialog
uber die Massaker an den Armeniern auffordert. Dabei waren mehr als
eine Million Armenier ums Leben gekommen.

Karabakh: Elections dimanche mais situation bloquee pour l’enclavear

Edicom, suisse
17 Juin 2005

Karabakh: Elections dimanche mais situation bloquee pour l’enclave
armenienne en Azerbaïdjan

par Mike Eckel

MARDAKERT, Azerbaïdjan (AP) – Le Haut-Karabakh, cette enclave
armenienne en Azerbaïdjan qui a proclame son independance, vote
dimanche. Mais, après dix ans d’un cessez-le-feu qui a mis fin a la
guerre ouverte, les perspectives de règlement du conflit semblent
plus eloignees que jamais, tant les positions des deux parties sont
inconciliables.

L’Azerbaïdjan estime que l’enclave, qui lui avait ete offerte par
Staline lors du trace des frontières internes a l’URSS, lui appartient
pour toujours et que seule une autonomie interne peut etre envisagee.

Les Armeniens, quant a eux, qu’ils soient du Karabakh ou
d’Armenie, jugent totalement impossible tout retour dans le giron de
l’Azerbaïdjan. Les Azeris, peuple turcophone musulman, sont consideres
a Erevan comme les ennemis hereditaires des Armeniens, peuple chretien,
qui les assimilent aux Turcs auteurs du genocide de 1915.

L’independance du Haut-Karabakh n’a ete reconnue par personne en
dehors de l’Armenie. Il s’agit d’une independance très formelle, si
l’on songe au fait que l’actuel president armenien, Robert Kotcharian,
avait preside avant son election aux destinees de l’enclave.

Des negociations ont lieu sous les auspices du “groupe de Minsk”,
qui reunit l’Armenie, l’Azerbaïdjan, la Russie, les Etats-Unis et
la France sous les auspices de l’OSCE (Organisation pour la securite
et la cooperation en Europe). Alors que ce groupe, qui ne laisse pas
filtrer grand-chose de ses travaux, se reunissait a nouveau vendredi,
une proposition de règlement datant de 2001 semble avoir fait long feu.

Selon la presse armenienne et azerbaïdjanaise, l’OSCE a propose
l’etablissement d’un condominium sur l’enclave, ce qui a enrage
les nationalistes des deux bords. Du coup, Bakou et Erevan ont paru
prendre leurs distances d’avec le processus de paix. “Il ne peut etre
question de parler de compromis mutuel. C’etait une thèse erronee”,
lancait en mars le president azerbaïdjanais Ilham Aliev, semblant
enterrer l’idee de condominium.

Ce a quoi le president du Karabakh, Arkadi Ghoukassian, a repondu:
“Ils ne veulent prendre aucun risque. Ils ne veulent pas prendre
leurs responsabilites. Ils veulent juste convaincre la communaute
internationale que l’Armenie est l’agresseur”.

Cet abcès de fixation est un frein au developpement du Caucase dans sa
totalite. C’est ainsi que le nouvel oleoduc Bakou-Tbilissi-Ceyhan (BTC)
reliant la Caspienne a la Mediterranee et dont la première section
a ete inauguree en mai, a dû contourner le Haut-Karabakh et l’Armenie.

La Banque mondiale estime qu’en cas de règlement du conflit, le
produit interieur brut armenien pourrait faire un bond de 30%, celui
de l’Azerbaïdjan de cinq pour cent. L’Armenie est en effet elle-meme
enclavee: sa frontière avec l’Azerbaïdjan est bien sûr fermee, mais
aussi celle avec la Turquie.

A Mardakert, ville du Haut-Karabakh situee sur la ligne de front,
les escarmouches sont presque quotidiennes malgre le cessez-le-feu
vieux de dix ans qui a mis un terme a la guerre ouverte. Celle-ci,
qui aurait fait 50.000 morts entre 1991 et 1995 et des dizaines de
milliers de refugies, a non seulement permis a l’enclave de proclamer
son independance mais aussi d’occuper le corridor alors peuple d’Azeris
qui la separait de l’Armenie. Les deux parties s’accusent regulièrement
de mener des incursions et des soldats y laissent encore leur vie.

David Chahnazarian, ancien ministre de la securite nationale et qui
aujourd’hui siège dans l’opposition au Parlement d’Erevan, estime
que les dirigeants des deux pays instrumentalisent le conflit pour
se maintenir au pouvoir: “Ce qui est mauvais pour l’Azerbaïdjan est
bon pour l’Armenie; ce qui est mauvais pour l’Armenie est bon pour
l’Azerbaïdjan: c’est tout ce qu’ils comprennent. Nos societes sont
plus proches d’une resolution pacifique que nos regimes eux-memes.”

AP

–Boundary_(ID_cp5KrsbAcr+gVk8Q3iaBKg)–

Baroque in Armenia

BAROQUE IN ARMENIA

A1plus

| 15:57:05 | 16-06-2005 | Culture |

“There is play and life in baroque, that is why it is understandable
and loved by everyone”, tenor Karen Hakobyan said a press conference
in the House of Journalists today.

June 21-July 8 Baroque music festival will be held for the first time
in Yerevan. 9 concerts will be performed, 6 of them – in the House
of Chamber Music, 2 – in the cultural center of Narekatsi and 1 – in
the school after Spendiarov. The price of tickets fluctuates between
500-1000 AMD. “If people can afford going to a cafe they can afford
going for a concert as well”, conductor Aram Talalyan noted.

He marked two principal goals of the festival, these being to present
the music to the audience and offer the young musicians the opportunity
to perform on the best stages.

Soprano Anna Mailyan is also expected to take part in the festival. “It
is a brilliant idea. There exist parallels between the works of
the middle ages and Baroque taste. Since the Armenian people have
wonderful medieval art, they will comprehend the Baroque taste as
well”, the singer said. Due to the lock of funds concerts will be
held in Yerevan only.

To note, the term “baroque” means “unpolished pearl”. It appeared in
Europe in 19-20 centuries and penetrated into the 1920-ies.

BAKU: Baku unhappy with OSCE report – MP

Baku unhappy with OSCE report – MP

Bilik Dunyasi news agency
10 Jun 05

Baku, 10 June: As is known, the Council of Europe [CE] has drafted
a plan of action for the forthcoming parliamentary elections in
Azerbaijan in November this year.

Azerbaijan does not agree with many of the points made by the OSCE
rapporteur on Nagornyy Karabakh, Goran Lenmarker, in his proposal
to the Azerbaijani parliament. The first point that angered Baku was
the fact that the aggressor country was not named.

“The position of the Azerbaijani delegation was such that the OSCE
meeting in Washington in early July and the winter session of the
Parliamentary Assembly [PA] of the CE should adopt a resolution
recognizing Armenia as an aggressor country and the self-proclaimed
regime in Nagornyy Karabakh as separatist. It can be seen from the
report that the OSCE does not have the same position as Azerbaijan,”
a member of the Azerbaijani delegation to the PACE, MP Eldar Ibrahimov,
has said.

That is why, the issue of putting the Karabakh problem on the agenda
of the OSCE’s annual meeting has not been resolved yet. This will
depend on the activities of the OSCE Minsk Group.

“The organization thinks that the OSCE Minsk Group is dealing with
a Karabakh settlement. But unfortunately, the Minsk Group does not
aspire to resolve the conflict,” Ibrahimov stressed.

This issue will be clarified following the meeting of the OSCE office
in Copenhagen in the second part of June.

Ombudsman is defenceless

A!plus

| 18:40:21 | 10-06-2005 | Politics |

OMBUDSMAN IS DEFENCELESS

Today the party «New Times» invited the political powers to represent them
the draft defending the Ombudsman. Those invited were offered two drafts,
where the main idea was as follow, «We strictly condemn any encroachment
towards the Ombudsman Institute which is the visiting card of the democratic
countries. We consider it another intervention of the criminal elements into
the political processes».

Let us remind you that the Ombudsman has disagreements with the both with
the legislative and with the executive powers. There have been different
encroachments towards the structure recently. In Particular, on May 26
Larissa Alaverdyan’s co-worker Serob Antinyan was arrested, and that very
day the processor of one of the computers in the office where precious
information was kept disappeared.

Although there were different ideas about the drafts, the overwhelming
majority of the political parties offered that the Ombudsman must be
defended as `attacking’ the state institute trying to act within the
framework of law is already becoming a habit.

Let us also add that the announcement of the parties in defence of the
Ombudsman will be ready in a week.

A Slap in the Face of John Evans

Armenian daily says US envoy deprived of award in fear of Turkish reaction

Haykakan Zhamanak, Yerevan
9 Jun 05

By Anna Akopyan

Very strange things have recently happened to US Ambassador to Armenia
John Evans. There are every reason to say that the diplomatic mission
in Armenia will have a special place in John Evans’s diplomatic
career. We said several months ago that the US Department of State was
discussing recalling Evans from Armenia. The reason was his close
relationship with the Armenian authorities, in particular with Defence
Minister Serzh Sarkisyan.

Last week another report came from the US Department of State – Evans
had been granted the Constructive Dissent Award. While analysts were
trying to clarify the background, another sensational report was
received from the Department of State – the award has been withdrawn
from Evans.

The matter is that a columnist of the California Courier, Harut
Sassounian, learnt about Evans’s award from our newspapers and phoned
Washington to get an official confirmation from the American Foreign
Service Association [AFSA]. Mr Sassounian has said that AFSA confirmed
the report as well as the fact that Evans was awarded for his
statements about the Armenian genocide.

“However, when my article was ready for publication, I received an
unexpected call from AFSA which said that the award commission has
decided to ‘take the award back’ from Ambassador John Evans. When I
asked why, the reply was: no comment,” the California Courier
columnist said. This is a real sensation. This is the first case in
the history of AFSA which was set up in 1968.

Irrespective of whether this is the first case or not, this is a
really shameful event; it is an honour for an American diplomat to be
granted such an award and it is a disgrace to find oneself in a
situation which Ambassador John Evans has found himself.

Anyway, one thing is clear – the US Department of State slapped John
Evans in his face with the assistance of AFSA. What is the reason for
this kind of attitude towards poor Evans? We may say that the decision
to withdraw the award is in the first place connected with USA-Turkey
relations since rewarding Evans for describing the 1915 events as
genocide would cause Turkey’s displeasure and this made AFSA to
withdraw the award.

Sassounian suggested that the Bush administration had forced AFSA to
take this unusual step taking into account its relations with
Turkey. He also called on everybody to protest against the decision
and ask US Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice to restore the award.

We should say that the names of the nominees to the award were already
known on 15 March, and if the Bush administration believed that
granting the award [to Evans] would worsen Turkish-American relations,
this problem would have been settled before the decision of the award
commission.

The decision to withdraw the award was prompted by new circumstances
which might not be the Turkish factor.

Anyway, this is an action against John Evans and a great shock in his
life. Information received from Washington in connection with John
Evans shows that there are speculations and processes going on around
him, and nobody knows what they will end with.

ANKARA: Parliamentarians to visit Armenia

Turkish Press Review
June 9 2005

STAR

PARLIAMENTARIANS TO VISIT ARMENIA

While a dispute over a recent aborted conference on Armenian issue is
still continuing in Turkey, a delegation of four deputies, one from
the opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP) and three from the
ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP), are due to leave for
Armenia today to express their views on the genocide allegations at a
conference in Yerevan. /Star/