Un homme d’affaires turc propose =?UNKNOWN?Q?=E0_la?= FRA de dialogu

Nouvelles d’Arménie Magazine
16 février 2005

Un homme d’affaires turc propose à la FRA de dialoguer avec la
Turquie

CAUSE, mercredi 16 février 2005 –ARMENEWS- Kaan Soyak, homme
d’affaires turc qui soutient depuis longtemps la reprise des
relations avec l’Arménie, a appelé lundi la FRA à entamer un dialogue
avec la Turquie. ” Je les invite sérieusement en Turquie pour une
discussion. Si le parti Dachnaktsoutioun est d’accord pour engager un
dialogue avec la Turquie, je vous promets que je ferais de mon mieux
pour l’organiser “, a souligné Kaan Soyak, l’un des deux coprésidents
du Conseil des affaires arméno-turques, lors d’une conférence à
Erevan. Il n’a cependant pas précisé quelles formes pourraient
prendre ce dialogue. Il a simplement expliqué qu’il pourrait
entraîner des ” résultats sérieux ” et donner à la FRA l’opportunité
de changer son image, négative, en Turquie. Selon lui, le
Dashnaktsoutioun n’est pas aussi anti-turc qu’il est présenté dans
son pays. ” En Turquie, le parti Dashnaksoutioun a une image
négative. Mais si vous me demandez mon avis, je décrirais ce parti et
ses leaders comme sérieux et sensés “, a précisé Kaan Soyak.
Ce dernier a lancé l’invitation immédiatement après avoir ” félicité
le peuple arménien” de la part du Premier ministre turc et du
ministre des Affaires étrangères. Mais on ne sait pas si Ankara a un
lien avec cette offre. Les cercles politiques turcs et les médias
affirment souvent que la FRA est un obstacle clef à la normalisation
des relations arméno-turques. Ils utilisent également le soutien
implicite du parti Dashnaktsoutioun aux demandes territoriales de
l’Arménie pour accuser Erevan de ne pas reconnaître la frontière
entre les deux pays.
La FRA est favorable à une attitude ferme envers la Turquie et
demande la reconnaissance du génocide arménien avant toute
normalisation des relations bilatérales. Les leaders du parti ont
dénoncé les efforts américains pour apaiser les tensions qui ont
conduit à la création du Conseil des affaires arméno-turques. Ils
sont également opposés à la réouverture de la frontière arméno-turque
qu’Ankara a fermé par solidarité avec l’Azerbaïdjan.
Le ministre turc des Affaires étrangères, Abdullah Gul, a rassuré la
semaine dernière son homologue azéri, Elmar Mammadyarov, en affirmant
que la frontière resterait fermée jusqu’à une résolution du conflit
du Karabagh. Le gouvernement arménien a souvent appelé la Turquie à
renoncer à cette précondition. Cette position est d’ailleurs soutenue
par les hommes d’affaires arméniens et turcs du conseil. Soyak a
précisé que ses collègues et lui allaient continuer à lutter pour la
réouverture de la frontière mais n’était pas très optimistes. Kaan
Soyak a estimé le volume annuel des échanges entre les deux pays, la
plupart passant par la Géorgie, à 120 millions de dollars. Selon lui,
ce chiffre triplera quand l’embargo de la Turquie sera suspendu.

–Boundary_(ID_GcVlxpoQUXShpnjPtMi7fg)–

Eastern Prelacy: Eastern, Western and Canadian Prelacies Gather inMo

PRESS RELEASE
Eastern Prelacy of the Armenian Apostolic Church of America
138 East 39th Street
New York, NY 10016
Tel: 212-689-7810
Fax: 212-689-7168
e-mail: [email protected]
Website:
Contact: Iris Papazian

EASTERN, WESTERN AND CANADIAN PRELACIES GATHER IN MONTREAL
FOR STS. GHEVONTIANTZ COMMEMORATION

NEW YORK, NY – Continuing a tradition that began in 2001, clergymen
from the Eastern, Western and Canadian Prelacies gathered in Montreal,
Canada, for the annual Sts. Ghevontiantz commemoration that precedes
the Feast of Vartanantz.

The clergy conference began on January 31 and concluded on February
2. Participating in the conference were the three prelates,
H.E. Archbishop Oshagan Choloyan, Eastern Prelacy; H.E. Archbishop
Moushegh Mardirossian, Western Prelacy; and H.G. Bishop Khajag
Hagopian, Canadian Prelacy. Also in attendance was H.E. Archbishop
Souren Kataroyan, former Prelate of Aleppo.

Each year the clergy gather to learn and to pray in an atmosphere
marked by brotherhood, fellowship and renewal.

The three major lecturers included: V. Rev. Fr. Meghrig Parikian, “The
Seminary’s Mission and Its Nurturing”; Rev. Fr. Karnig Kouyounian,
“The Armenian Church’s Contribution to Armenian Culture”; and
Rev. Manuel Jinbashian, “Translations of the Bible.”

An important aspect of this year’s clergy conference centered around
three encyclicals recently issued by His Holiness Aram I, Catholicos of
the Great House of Cilicia, commemorating the 1600th anniversary of the
founding of the Armenian alphabet, the 90th anniversary of the Genocide
of 1915, and the 75th anniversary of the Seminary of the Cilician See.

The clergymen also attended a special blessing service of the new
Canadian Prelacy building. The official opening of the new headquarters
will take place in May.

The Feast of Ghevontiantz is named in honor of Ghevont Yeretz
(Leondius the Cleric) who stood alongside Vartan Mamigonian during
the Vartanantz war, and became the symbol of a collective group of
clergy who gave their lives for their faith and nation.

http://www.armenianprelacy.org

Speaker Of French Parliament Proposes That Independent International

SPEAKER OF FRENCH PARLIAMENT PROPOSES THAT INDEPENDENT
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTION CONDUCT RESEARCH INTO ALLEGATIONS OF SO-
CALLED ARMENIAN GENOCIDE.

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 7. ARMINFO. The Speaker of the French Parliament
Jean Louis- Debre has proposed that an independent international
institution conduct research into allegations of the so-called
Armenian genocide. Still continuing his official Turkey visit, Debre
voiced his proposal at a meeting with Turkish Parliamentary European
Union (EU) Adjustment Committee Yasar Yakis and other commissioners.
Debre proposed research be undertaken into the so-called genocide
allegations by an independent international institution. Expressing
that a group of researchers from The United Nations (UN), the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), and The Council of Europe along
with a Swiss group could conduct this independent research. Debre noted
that this may be the only way to reveal whether or not the genocide
allegations are true. Yakis, on the other hand, stressed that any
assessments based on the hypotheses that an Armenian genocide did occur
without any analysis on the validity of some events that are described
as “genocide” would be erroneous. Yakis said that Turkey is not opposed
to the historians’ research and studies, it has opened the archives on
this issue; however, it is the Armenian side that has not open their
archives. A commissioner and a Republican People’s Party (CHP) member
deputy Onur Oymen also announced that a similar meeting regarding the
issue was previously held in Vienna; however, the Armenian historians
did not attend the second meeting even though Turkey had opened its
archives regarding the issue and presented all information, including
records and documents for examination. Oymen asked: “To which country
had this proposal of yours been made before?” and emphasized that
making political decisions over historical events paves the way for
erroneous outcomes. Debre in response to Oymen’s question of “Why did
you pass a law in your parliament without having research or studies
done on the issue of Armenian genocide?” with, “Let’s put this aside.
We have to forget the past. We want to assist you on your way to
the EU.”

ANKARA: Missionary Work and Minorities

Missionary Work and Minorities
by Ali Bulac

Zaman, Turkey
Feb 8 2005

The reason the West attaches great importance to the different groups
with religious or ethnic minority status in Turkey or in another
country, and its interference in the internal affairs of that country
by exploiting the conditions of the minorities, which to a great
extent need to be bettered, is its desire to use the minorities as
tools while deepening and expanding its fields of influence.
Throughout history, European countries have used minorities as the
Sword of Damocles.

In the 19th century, countries which supported missionary work the
most were the United States, Britain and France. The French acted in
very cruel and puristic manner against religion and the church after
the 1789 revolution; however, when it came to the missionary work,
the secular revolutionaries did not hesitate to boost funds allocated
for this activity generously.

The policies European countries have pursued regarding minorities
through missionaries, have been very tragic. In the last quarter of
the 19th century and in the first 15 years of the 20th century,
missionaries instigated the Armenians who had lived in peace for
years in the Ottoman Empire, and who were termed “Millet-i Sadika”
[loyal nation], encouraging them to revolt.

It is interesting to note that missionary schools are mostly opened
in cities where non-Muslim population is dense, it cannot be said
that missionaries show any interest in places where the non-Muslim
population is below 20 percent. During the years 1911-1913, 39
percent of Van’s population, 33 percent of Bitlis’ population, 30
percent of Izmit’s population and 24 percent Bursa’s population,
where missionary schools were highly effective, were non-Muslims.

The American missionary schools had great influence on the Armenians,
particularly on those who were Protestants. According to a research
conducted by Yusuf Akcuraoglu, “In 1913-1914, more than one third of
the students who went to foreign schools during the Ottoman Empire
attended American schools.” Those who graduated from these schools
participated in social life as a middle class people and the
intellectuals grew up with nationalistic ideas and indoctrinated
their coreligionists for the independence struggle.

Miralay Ismet Inonu who was the head of Erkan-i Harbiye [Staff
Officers’ School] in 1920, once spoke in the Turkish Grand National
Assembly (TBMM) as follows: “There are American schools and colleges
in the surroundings of Antep. Today, these American colleges are
Ussul-Hareke (action center) of the French. They are using these
American schools as the Ussul Hareke (action center) to inflict pain
on us and to kill our people. They attack and place howitzers there
and use them as warehouses. In brief, I think they were built not as
schools but as fortresses within our country.” In one of his
speeches, Mustafa Kemal talked about the rise of the spiritual Pontus
members at the Merzifon American school.

(TBMM Docs., Session 1, Article 1, V. 4, 2. Ed., 1942, p. 296;
Associate Prof. Ugur Kocabasoglu, Missionary Work in Turkey, Islamic
Research Journal, V. 4, Issue: 1, Ocak-1990)

After the second Constitutional Monarchy, Muslim circles started to
show interest in missionary schools as well. After the declaration of
the Republic, a remarkable increase was observed. One of the
important results of these was the number of the supporters of the
“American Mandate,” constituting an important percentage, during the
armistice years.

It is possible to see that missionaries were active in three main
regions during the Ottoman Empire:

Western Region: Istanbul, Izmir, Bursa, Izmit, Kayseri, Tokat,
Merzifon. Central Region: Tarsus, Adana, Antep, Adiyaman, Urfa.
Eastern Region: Erzurum, Van, Bitlis, Harput, Diyarbakir, Mardin.

Now it is the earthquake region, their main fields of action are the
coastal bands of the Mediterranean, Eastern and Southeast Anatolia.
There are studies being carried out in Hatay on the Nusayri
population. Studies in the Black Sea region, aimed at awakening a
pro-Pontus consciousness, are being monitored. It is obvious that
missionary work is not solely related to the spread of a religion or
proselytization, which starts and ends in the conscience of people.
Behind these activities, there are geopolitical, strategic, economic
and military benefits for the countries concerned. The missionary
institutions have a nearly 200-year experience in Turkey and a
historic reflex on Turks. I think these activities serve more than
one purpose. One of these aims is to form “a new minority” within the
country. Undoubtedly, they want to recruit this minority from the
country’s current population.

Tbilisi: President: European aid could stand improvement

President: European aid could stand improvement
By Mary Makharashvili

The Messenger, Georgia
Feb 7 2005

Thank you for your assistance, but its current form is ineffective, was
President Mikheil Saakashvili’s challenge to Europe while delivering
the keynote address at the two-day conference on ‘South Caucasus in
the 21st century: Challenges and Opportunities,’ held on February
4-5 at the Marriott Courtyard.

Although the president’s speech on Friday was closed to reporters,
conference attendees confirmed the president’s sentiment, some
agreeing, others questioning and some clarifying his request for
Europe to be a more active partner for Georgia.

Commenting on the president’s words, Minister of Foreign Affairs
Salome Zurabishvili said that the president was neither expressing
anger nor complaining in his speech. She said that the president
“simply pointed out some facts” and that it is “necessary that Europe
transform its projects into more concrete assistance.”

“Yes, earlier there was always readiness and assistance from Europe
to assist, but they did not target concrete problems,” Zurabishvili
told The Messenger.

She added that Saakashvili highlighted the example of penal reform.
Instead of sending numerous experts to analyze the situation, he
implied Europe would be better off to build prisons.

The president’s words resonated with many attendees. Director of
the Danish Institute for International Studies Per Carlsen told The
Messenger, “the president was totally right.”

“The European Union has been very, very slow in recognizing the
neighborhood of the Caucasus and that it is a part of Europe. It
has to do much more to play a positive role in the reform process in
Georgia and, of course, hopefully in Armenia and Azerbaijan as well,”
Carlsen added.

President of Project on Transitional Democracies Bruce Jackson,
however, saw the president’s speech as part of his general, vocal
appeal to the international community for support. In his speech,
Jackson said, President Saakashvili was challenging Europe to move as
quickly as the United States has done on things like the Millennium
Challenge Account.

“The president admires what the EU has done on the neighborhood
policy because oftentimes decision making in Brussels is very slow,”
Jackson said.

When Saakashvili visits the United States, Jackson said, “he is always
challenging my government to do more and I think today he was also
challenging our European allies to do better.”

“One thing about Mikheil Saakashvili is that he is a man in a hurry,”
Jackson said.

In an interview with The Messenger, President of the POLICY Foundation
(Russia) Vyacheslav Nikonov described the European Union as “a very
bureaucratic institution.” He said, “all the assistance programs are
to spend money inside Europe on feasibility studies, conferences,
but not on real assistance.”

“That is quite understandable as we in Russia deal with the same kind
of situation. That is just Europe,” he said. “They do not spend much
money on outside purposes. They like to spend money on themselves.”

Secretary of the Georgian National Security Council Gela Bezhuashvili
backed up the president’s statement, saying Europe lags behind the
United States in terms of aid to Georgia. “Of course U.S. assistance
to Georgia is greater than Europe’s and it is more oriented to concrete
results,” Bezhuashvili told The Messenger.

Security in the Caucasus

More than 140 policymakers, political scientists, researchers and
high level government officials from 31 countries as well as the
representatives of different international organizations including
the EU, NATO and OSCE participated in the conference. The Georgian
Foundation for Strategic and International Studies (GFSIS) organized
the event under the support of the Sasakawa Peace Foundation (SPF,
Japan).

“We are trying to find out which direction the South Caucasus is
heading in and what concrete steps need to be taken,” Vice-President
of GFSIS Temur Yakobashvili told The Messenger on Thursday.

President of GFSIS Alexander Rondeli noted the conference “is of great
important” because it includes not only Georgia, but the entire South
Caucasus region.

“When issues are discussed in the context of the South Caucasus
and when at the same time representatives of United States, our
neighboring countries and leading countries of Asia attend it, this
means that the region is the focus of the interest,” Rondeli said in
an interview with The Messenger.

One of the main topics of the conference was security in the South
Caucasus region.

Asked how secure the Caucasus region is, National Security Council
Secretary Bezhuashvili said that Georgia is currently analyzing
security in the Caucasus region.

“There are quite a lot of dangers in this region but the majority
of them are in the economic sphere and not in the military one,”
Bezhuashvili said.

“There are the issues of human trafficking, drug smuggling, and
criminal issues. But what is more important is that during this year
Georgia take steps that set an example for others on how difficult
situations can be dealt with in a short period of time,” he said.

The absence of the late Prime Minister Zurab Zhvania, who was scheduled
to speak on Friday, gave attendees even more to worry about. Vice
President of GFSIS Yakobashvili said the tragic fact “clearly shows
that our state is quite weak with regard to institution building.”

“The death of such an important figure as Mr. Zurab Zhvania may have
quite a serious impact not only in Georgia, but also in the region as
well. I mean that he was a person that was respected not only within
the country but also by the leaders of many countries and was playing a
solid and positive role in international relations,” Yakobashvili said.

“The security of state official is always directly connected with
a country’s political security. The main thing is that the change
of authority does not bring radical changes to the country. For
this to happen, institutional building of the country is needed,”
Yakobashvili concluded.

BAKU: Separatist ‘minister’ says breakaway ex-Soviet regions united

Baku Today, Azerbaijan
Feb 6 2005

Separatist ‘minister’ says breakaway ex-Soviet regions united

Sponsored Links

AFP 06/02/2005 09:08

BAKU, Feb 5 (AFP) – Breakaway regions in the former Soviet Union have
pledged mutual support in the case of military intervention, the
‘foreign minister’ of a self-proclaimed republic in Georgia said in
an interview published Saturday.

“Our countries have an agreement that will come into effect in case
of war,” Sergei Shamba, the foreign minister of the self-styled
republic of Abkhazia told Azerbaijan’s Echo daily in a front-page
interview.

Nagorno-Karabakh, a breakaway region of Azerbaijan, as well as
Georgia’s two separatist regions Abkhazia and South Ossetia; and
Moldova’s Transdniestr republic, “can act quite effectively”
together, Shamba said.

A series of ethnic conflicts shortly after the collapse of the Soviet
Union led to the breakaway of the regions from the newly independent
states; they have since existed in a legal limbo and are unrecognized
by the outside world.

Shamba did not go into the details of how the outcast regimes would
act in case of an attack but said “the mutual support and solidarity
between our countries is real.”

“When a people rises to fight for its victory and independence, no
force, no matter what military might it has at its disposal, can
quash this determination,” Shamba told Echo.

Three separatist republics in the Caucasus region, Karabakh, Ossetia
and Abkhazia, straddle the route of the four billion dollar BTC
pipeline, which is scheduled to begin pumping Caspian Sea oil to
western markets through Turkey later this year.

Western governments have recently stepped up their efforts to find
settlements for the simmering conflicts, which lend to instability in
the region and inflate the security costs for the BP-led pipeline
project.

Apparent Gas Leak Kills Georgian Premier

Apparent Gas Leak Kills Georgian Premier

Associated Press
February 4, 2005

By MISHA DZHINDZHIKHASHVILI, Associated Press Writer

TBILISI, Georgia – Georgian Prime Minister Zurab Zhvania, who helped
lead the revolution that toppled the corruption-tainted regime of
Eduard Shevardnadze, was killed Thursday by an apparent natural gas
leak, the ex-Soviet republic’s interior minister said.

Zhvania, 41, was at a friend’s apartment when the leak occurred,
Interior Minister Vano Merabishvili said in a live television
broadcast.

“It is an accident,” Merabishvili said. “We can say that poisoning by
gas took place.”

Security guards broke through a window early Thursday when they heard
no signs of life inside the apartment several hours after the prime
minister arrived, Merabishvili said. Zhvania’s host, Zurab Usupov,
deputy governor of Georgia’s Kvemo-Kartli region, also died.

An Iranian-made gas-powered heating stove was in the main room of the
mezzanine-floor apartment, where a table was set up with a backgammon
set lying open. Zhvania was in a chair; Usupov’s body was found in
the kitchen. Security guards tried unsuccessfully to resuscitate the
prime minister, Merabishvili said.

“It all happened suddenly,” he said.

Central heating is scarce in Georgia, and many people use gas or wood
stoves in their homes.

President Mikhail Saakashvili convened an emergency Cabinet meeting
following Zhavania’s death. It began with a moment of silence.

“In Zurab Zhvania, Georgia has lost a great patriot, who devoted his
entire life to serving the motherland. Zurab’s death is a great blow
to Georgia and to me personally. I lost a very close friend, a
reliable adviser and a great ally,” Saakashvili said.

Russian President Vladimir Putin (news – web sites) sent a telegram of
condolence to Saakashvili, which said that Zhvania “was well known in
Russia as a supporter of the development of friendly, good-neighborly
relations between the Russian and Georgian peoples.”

A longtime politician, Zhvania was part of the opposition to former
Georgian President Eduard Shevardnadze and played a prominent role in
protests that led to Shevardnadze’s ouster after allegedly fraudulent
elections in November 2003.

Saakashvili, who led the protests, named Zhvania prime minister
following his landslide election in January 2004. Zhvania was
considered a moderate to counterbalance the more impetuous president,
and he was one of the key government figures trying to negotiate
settlements with Georgia’s separatist regions.

Zhvania was born in the capital Tbilisi on Dec. 9, 1963. A graduate of
the biology department at Tbilisi State University, he led the Green
of Georgia party in 1988-93 and served in the parliament beginning in
1992.

He became parliamentary speaker in 1995 and led the moderate United
Democrats opposition party, and for several years he and Saakashvili
were rivals for leadership of the opposition.

Like Saakashvili, Zhvania was a one-time ally of Shevardnadze. After
breaking with Shevardnadze, however, Zhvania followed a more
conciliatory path than Saakashvili, and he was considered a more
moderate politician who sought consensus rather than conflict.

Zhvania is survived by his wife and three children.

;u=/ap/20050203/ap_on_re_eu/georgia_prime_minister

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&amp

OSCE mission visits four districts held by Karabakh

OSCE mission visits four districts held by Karabakh

Mediamax news agency
2 Feb 05

YEREVAN

“The OSCE mission is satisfied with the working conditions provided by
the Nagornyy Karabakh authorities,” the head of the OSCE fact-finding
mission, Emily Margarethe Haber, said in Agdam District, which the
mission visited today.

Emily Haber declined to comment on the results of monitoring, saying
that the mission has not yet completed its activity.

The OSCE fact-finding mission, which includes experts from Russia, the
USA, France, Finland, Italy, Sweden and Germany, has already been to
four out of the seven districts controlled by the Nagornyy Karabakh
defence army. These are Kalbacar, Cabrayil, Fuzuli and Agdam.

BAKU: Moscow-Baku partnership meets interests of peoples – FM

ITAR-TASS News Agency
TASS
February 2, 2005 Wednesday

Moscow-Baku partnership meets interests of peoples – FM

By Ksenia Kaminskaya and Viktor Shulman

BAKU

The development of strategic partnership between Russia and
Azerbaijan meets the interests of the peoples of the two countries,
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said.

Lavrov and his Azerbaijani counterpart Elmar Mamedyarov held talks on
Wednesday to discuss bilateral relations, including Year of
Azerbaijan in Russia to open this month, the situation in the
Caucasus and interaction at the international arena.

Mamedyarov shared Sergei Lavrov’s view under which the development of
strategic partnership between Russia and Azerbaijan “meets the
interests of the peoples of the two countries and is an important
factor of peace and stability in the Caucasus.”

The Russian minister met Azerbaijani President Ilkham Aliyev and
Prime Minister Artur Razi-zade. “Relations with Russia are very
important for Azerbaijan,” Aliyev said. He praised “political
contacts, in particular between the leadership of the two countries.”
The Azerbaijani president noted the positive development of
cooperation in the energy sector and humanitarian interaction. “This
has a positive impetus on our relations and processes in the region,”
the president said.

The talks focused on the agreements reached as part of the
Azerbaijani president’s visit to Russia in February 2004. The sides
stressed the need “to take concrete measures to develop business
partnership in order to double trade turnover in the future.”

The negotiations touched on international issues, including “steps
towards strengthening interaction in the fight against international
terrorism.” The foreign ministers of the two countries called for
“stepping up cooperation within the U.N., the CIS, the OSCE and the
Council of Europe.” They discussed problems related to increasing the
U.N. effectiveness and its reform.

Lavrov and Mamedyarov supported the Prague process of negotiations
between the foreign ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan with the
involvement of co-chairmen of the OSCE Minsk Group on
Nagorno-Karabakh settlement. The ministers exchanged views on working
out the Caspian Sea legal status, holding the 2nd Caspian summit,
principles of the military activity on sea and building underwater
arteries.

Glendale: 20 to vie for 4 seats on council

Los Angeles Daily News, CA
Jan 30 2004

20 to vie for 4 seats on council

Candidate field sets city record

By Naush Boghossian, Staff Writer

GLENDALE – Voters are gearing up for what officials said is the
largest City Council field in Glendale’s history with 20 candidates
and four seats on the ballot.
Election officials are verifying the 100 signatures each council
hopeful is required to submit with their filing forms, in the wake of
Thursday’s deadline. The city clerk will announce Wednesday whether
the signatures of registered voters for each applicant were adequate.

“It will be an interesting race. We have a wide variety of
candidates,” said City Clerk Doris Twedt, who said the most
candidates running in previous City Council elections was 13 in 1999.

The large field of candidates for the April 5 election is most likely
due to Gus Gomez’s departure, who left his seat earlier this month
after he was elected Superior Court judge.

“I think having an open seat is certainly is a catalyst for more
individuals to be interested in running,” Councilman Rafi Manoukian
said. “And that’s historically true not just for City Council but for
other elected positions as well. Whenever you have open seats,
invariably there are more candidates running.”

In addition to incumbents Frank Quintero, Dave Weaver and Bob
Yousefian, 17 residents filed their forms by Thursday’s deadline:

Vrej Agajanian; Aram Barsoumian; John Drayman, 46, a member of the
Montrose Shopping Park Association board; Pauline Field, 56, involved
with the creation of the city’s Commission on the Status of Women;
Hovik Gabikian, 35, eligibility worker; Glynda Gomez, 40, prosecutor
with the California Department of Justice; Shirley Yap Griffin; Steve
Hedrick, 52, a former Disney executive who now owns his own show
production company; Chahe Keuroghelian, former Glendale police
spokesman; Joe Mandoky; Larry Miller; Ara Najarian, 44, member of the
Glendale Community College board; Richard Seeley; businessman Garry
K. Sinanian; John E. Stevenson; Odalis Suarez; and attorney Anahid
Oshagan.

The controversial Americana at Brand development may also have
sparked interest in getting involved in local politics, said Larry
Levine, a political consultant with offices in Sherman Oaks.

“It’s definitely unusual. It usually takes one hot-button issue to
generate that much interest,” Levine said. “But it’s hard to know
what’s motivating 17 non-incumbents to run for office.”

Of the 17 non-incumbents, seven are of Armenian descent.

“The Armenian political community has been growing in influence over
the past 10 years and this could be a byproduct of that,” Levine
said. “This involvement could indicate the group is maturing in its
political interest in civic affairs.”

With so many people running, the biggest challenge may be a candidate
being seen as an individual.

“The biggest challenge is differentiating themselves from others in
the crowd and getting their message out to the public,” Manoukian
said. “It’s going to be difficult for the community to sort out who’s
who, and that’s the task of the candidate to get through to the
community.”

Anita Q. Gabrielian, Armine Hacopian, Victor King and Linda Sheffield
filed papers to run for three open positions on the Glendale
Community College Board of Trustees.

Ronald Borucki and Phillip Kazanjian filed forms for the city
treasurer position.

The city clerk and school board position deadlines are Feb. 1 because
incumbents are not running in those races.