Armenian Cargo Already Passing Via Upper Lars Checkpoint

ARMENIAN CARGO ALREADY PASSING VIA UPPER LARS CHECKPOINT

PanARMENIAN.Net
11.03.2010 13:02 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The opening of the Upper Lars checkpoint is not
connected anyhow with normalization of Georgian-Russian relations,
Grigol Tabatadze , Georgian Ambassador to Armenia told a press
conference in Yerevan.

According to him, the relations between Tbilisi and Moscow will not
change until the issue of South Ossetia and Abkhazia is resolved. He
stressed that Georgia does not have much economic benefit from the
opening of the Upper Lars checkpoint and did it primarily for Armenia.

However, according to the Georgian diplomat, the only benefit of
Georgia is that the country will be able to transport their cargo
through Russia. "I know that the Armenian goods are already passing
via Upper Lars checkpoint," Tabatadze said.

Commenting on statements by the former Georgian state minister for
conflict resolution, a leader of the United Opposition, Georgia
Haindrava, that Russia opened the checkpoint in order "to supply
weapon to its military base in Gyumri" Tabatadze said: "Not a single
bullet will pass through the checkpoint"

The opening of the checkpoint does not threaten Georgia’ national
security. Before the opening the Georgian side has discussed the issue
within the National Security Council and all possible scenarios have
been evaluated, the Ambassador of Georgia in Armenia said.

Turkey Not To Send Back Its Ambassador To US, Erdogan

TURKEY NOT TO SEND BACK ITS AMBASSADOR TO US, ERDOGAN

ANSAmed
March 9, 2010 Tuesday 3:51 PM CET
Italy

(ANSAmed) Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan said that Turkey would
not send back its ambassador to U.S. before seeing clear results,
as Anatolia news agency reports from in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, where
he was set to receive the ‘King Faisal International Prize’.

On March 4, Turkey temporarily recalled its ambassador in Washington
D.C. Namik Tan minutes after a U.S. congressional panel approved
a resolution labelling the incidents of 1915 as "genocide". The
resolution on Armenian allegations related to the incidents of 1915
was adopted at the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Foreign
Affairs in a voting of 23-22. Shortly after the measure passed
the committee voting, Turkish government said in a statement that
Ambassador Tan had been recalled to Ankara for consultations. Speaking
to reporters, Erdogan said that adoption of the resolution concerned
Turkey, adding that the U.S. was a strategic ally and partner of
Turkey. Erdogan said that the decision was not binding, however,
the attitude was important. He said that the attitude of the U.S. in
the next period was very important for Turkey, adding that Turkey
was waiting for the attitude the U.S. would assume next.

Erdogan noted that he did not believe the U.S. would sacrifice its
strategic partner for simple political discussions. He said that
Turkey would assess the situation in a large scale, and would not
send back its ambassador before seeing a clear result.

Turkey and Armenia signed two protocols on October 10, 2009 to
normalize relations between the two countries. The protocols envisage
the two countries to establish diplomatic ties and open the border
that has been close since 1993.

The ANC Fighting For Nicol Pashinian’s Freedom

THE ANC FIGHTING FOR NICOL PASHINIAN’S FREEDOM

Aysor
March 10 2010
Armenia

The Armenian National Congress issued a statement in connection with
the decision of the Court of Appeal concerning the case of the chief
editor of the "Haykakan Zhamanak" newspaper Nicol Pashinian.

"What happened to Nicol Pashinian is not justice but a political
lynching and expression of personal vengeance. At the basis of this,
there are two realities, as a journalist and as a political figure
in the socio-political initiative of "Alternative" and in campaign
of "Impeachment" for more than 10 years he has been the main critic
of the "robbery regime" and has fought against it as a solider", –
the statement said.

"Nikol Pashinian, who became a political exile after March 1, 2008,
on June 1, 2009 voluntarily appeared in front of the justice and
faced a lack of justice in Armenia and the narrow thinking of the
ruling regime, a usual manifestation of revenge. Atrocities used
against him and other political prisoners is the expression of fear
of the predatory groups that have seized the power, fear of the truth,
fear that the eyes of the people can be open, the fear of justice.

The Armenian National Congress will spare no effort to fight for
freedom of Nicol Pashinian, and other political prisoners, "- said
in a statement the ANC.

BAKU: Britain Not To Discuss "Armenian Genocide"

BRITAIN NOT TO DISCUSS "ARMENIAN GENOCIDE"

news.az
March 10 2010
Azerbaijan

The issue of "Armenian genocide" will not be discussed in Great
Britain.

"Great Britain and Turkey maintain friendly relations based on
economic, political and military interests.

For this reason, the issue of recognition of the "Armenian genocide"
will not be discussed in this country", said David Miller, British
diplomat and former British ambassador in Armenia, according to
AzerTaj.

The diplomat considers that the issue of recognition of the "Armenian
genocide" will never be included into the agenda of the government
and the parliament of Britain.

Miller said: "The most important is that Armenia cannot replace Turkey
and Azerbaijan that are the important strategic, economic and political
allies of Great Britain".

As for the processes ongoing in the region, the diplomat said Great
Britain is not interested in the resumption of war in the South
Caucasus and resolution of the Karabakh conflict.

BAKU; Congress Decision To ‘Affect’ Karabakh Process

CONGRESS DECISION TO ‘AFFECT’ KARABAKH PROCESS
Aliyah Fridman

news.az
March 10 2010
Azerbaijan

Yusif Babanli News.Az interviews Yusif Babanli, board member of the
Azerbaijani American Council (AAC).

The US House of Representatives Foreign Relations Committee adopted a
resolution recognizing the killings of Armenians in 1915 as ‘genocide’
with 23 votes for and 22 votes against. How would you comment on
this decision?

Since 2008, the Armenians have been persistent and increased the
pressure on legislators after they were disappointed in their hope
that the then newly elected President Obama would formally recognize
the so-called Armenian genocide. The emergence of a president who
was firm on acknowledging the events of 1915 as genocide was one of
the greatest hopes of the Armenian diaspora. Since 2007, it has been
expected that the US House Foreign Affairs Committee will annually
approve the motion and endorse the resolution, passing it on to the
floor of the House. The strategic plan of the Armenian lobby is to
reach out to those congressmen who are members of this committee,
ensuring that the process goes through the first stage. The committee
includes very pro-Armenian congressmen such as Howard Berman, Brad
Sherman, Dana Rohrabacher, Barbara Lee and Gary Ackerman. In 2007, the
Armenians achieved the same results in a 27 to 21 committee vote in
favour of the resolution. So, I think although the gap between those
congressmen voting in favour and those voting against is smaller this
year, the efforts of the Turkish diaspora and the Turkish government
were not enough last year, although they were pretty effective on all
other fronts and initiatives. Another interesting fact is that one
of the friends of the Turkish community – Sheila Jackson Lee (TX) –
abstained, thus increasing the chances of the bill making it to the
House floor.

In any case, before the bill H-252 is voted on, we will see many
developments, especially reactions from the Turkish government and
Obama Administration. More than just reaching out to the legislators
in the months preceding this important hearing, Armenian lobby groups
tried to dramatize the whole hearing before the committee and media by
pulling three elderly Armenians presented as ‘genocide’ survivors from
the offices of elected officials to hearings of this nature. However,
the sad reality is that when the members of the committee who voted
against the endorsement and administrations try to prevent the bill
from passing, they hint at the importance of Turkey as a NATO ally
and strategic partner in the Middle East, but do not mention the sad
past of Turkey and Azerbaijan, where nearly two million Anatolian and
Azerbaijani Turks were massacred by Armenian bands and guerrillas in
the early 20th century. It is imperative that the Turkish government
produces and disseminates more material on the fate of Turks that
died at the hands of Dashnaks and Hnchaks, thus presenting the much
needed facts before the US media and legislators.

What is the possibility of recognition of the ‘genocide’ by Congress
as a whole?

I’d like to reiterate that the possibility of the Congress recognizing
the so-called genocide is always high and will always be high. As
long as the Armenian community actively participates in American
socio-political life, this danger will never fade away. In parallel
to just befriending the US legislators, the Armenian diaspora also
actively promotes future legislators of Armenian descent which is
likely to make it even harder to contain the efforts of the Armenian
lobby to get this bill passed, unless their efforts are countered
by Turkish and Azerbaijani diaspora. Luckily, both Turkish and
Azerbaijani diaspora have become more active in the past few years
and more and more Azerbaijani and Turkish Americans are involved in
socio-political life on the local and national levels. At this stage,
I don’t think the bill will pass because of the nature of US-Turkey
relations and the current situation in the war on terror and conflict
in the Middle East. By passing this bill, the United States is
likely to alienate Turkey, which would readily turn its back on the
US and open links with states such as Iran and Syria with which the
ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) has already established
intimate ties. Not only could this jeopardize US positions and its
progress in Afghanistan and Iraq but it would further destabilize the
overall situation in the Middle East. That’s what the AKP is banking
on as an option. Unfortunately, not many congressmen who actively and
semi-actively support the ‘Armenian genocide’ resolution realize this
immediate danger. Stopping these possible developments will require
much effort from the US administration, both through direct contact
with the legislators and speaking out on the issue in the media,
just as the Bush Administration did.

There is an opinion that the White House is against worsening relations
with Turkey, so it is against adopting the genocide resolution. What
role does the president’s position play in this?

Worsening relations with Turkey is the last thing President Obama
wants. With Obama’s peaceful agenda to advance US foreign policy in the
Muslim world and end the war in Iraq and Afghanistan by emerging as
a winner with fewer casualties and financial losses, it is necessary
for the Obama Administration not to restrict Turkey as one of its
strategic allies in the region. Barack Obama knows that recognition
of the so-called genocide would not only worsen US-Turkey relations,
but would also help to transform Turkey. It is no secret that if the
bill is passed, the nationalist faction of Turks will unite with the
religious faction and support the incumbent AKP administration which,
apart from partnering the West, also looks to the East and wants to be
a leader in the Muslim world. Moreover, the passage of the resolution
could also lead to the breaking of contracts with US defence firms on
the sale of billions of dollars worth of arms to Turkey. President
Obama who limited his earlier promises as senator to recognize the
‘Armenian Genocide’ to using the term Metz Yeghern (‘great calamity’
in Armenian) in 2008, should come forward and show his support for
Turkey and reiterate America’s commitment to strategic partnership with
Turkey. This is a good chance for the administration to continue the
diplomatic overtures that started when Obama came to office. We hope
that sound moves from the White House will prevent this resolution
from passing and leave the matter to historians.

Turkey recalled its ambassador Namik Tan from the United States on
Thursday. What else can Turkey do to influence the Congress decision?

In my opinion, Turkey will make apparent moves to indicate its
readiness to take uncompromising ‘good will’ actions with regard
to states like Syria, Iran and Russia and/or further worsen its
relations with Israel. Turkey might also possibly make amendments to
its agreements with the US on the Incirlik base as well as revise its
strategy on the war on terror. Of course, these are not immediate
actions many would expect from Turkey, but the fact that the AKP
has made some bold moves (especially towards its ally Israel) in the
past year or so may signal its hardcore commitment to its agenda. And
again, taking into consideration the sensitivity of the ‘genocide’
accusations for ordinary Turks, the recognition of the so-called
genocide by the US Congress would trigger a ‘united we stand’ stance
from the Turkish public in support of counter-actions by the AKP.

How might the decision of the House of Representatives affect the
Karabakh settlement?

That’s one of the major negative effects of this resolution. If the
bill passes, it will make Armenia bold in its no-compromise stance on
the Karabakh conflict. In the long run, it will give more reasons to
the Armenians to justify their occupation of Azerbaijani territory;
they will base their irredentist claims on their alleged fear of
suppression and ‘new genocide’ by (Azerbaijani) Turks. For decades
now, they have portrayed the military offensive and ethnic cleansing
of Karabakh from its ethnic Azerbaijani population as a consequence of
the so-called ‘Sumgayit pogroms’, ‘Kirovobad pogroms’, ‘Baku pogroms’
deliberately relating them to their past, while at the same time
forgetting about the murder and mass exodus of Azeris from Armenia
starting in November 1987. On the other hand, this may also push
Turkey to deeper involvement and persistence on the Karabakh conflict.

On 5 March, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu already called
upon the US to clarify its position on the Karabakh conflict and
Azerbaijani-Armenian reconciliation while speaking about the occupation
of Azerbaijani territories by Armenian troops.

Yusif Babanli is a board member of the Azerbaijani American Council
(AAC), co-founder of the US Azeris Network (USAN) and corporate
secretary and director (South region).

OCE PA Delegation Has Arrived In Georgia

OCE PA DELEGATION HAS ARRIVED IN GEORGIA

armradio.am
09.03.2010 11:35

OSCE Parliamentary Assembly delegation headed by President Joao Soares
and Special Representative on Nagorno-Karabakh and Georgia Goran
Lennmarker arrived in Georgia within the framework of the regional
visit, Georgia Online reports.

Today, the delegation will hold meetings with Georgian President
Mikheil Saakashvili, Chairman of Parliament David Bakradze and
opposition representatives.

"The purpose of the visit is to survey the situation in Georgia,"
Soares told the journalists at the airport. "We intend to hold a
number of meetings and get acquainted with many stances," he said
emphasizing special priority will be given to the participation of
OSCE in the conflict settlements.

The delegation is expected to visit Armenia March 10-13 and Azerbaijan
March 13-16.

Robert Fisk: Living Proof Of The Armenian Genocide

ROBERT FISK: LIVING PROOF OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

Independent
Tuesday, 9 March 2010
UK

The US wants to deny that Turkey’s slaughter of 1.5 million Armenians
in 1915 was genocide. But the evidence is there, in a hilltop orphanage
near Beirut

It’s only a small grave, a rectangle of cheap concrete marking it
out, blessed by a flourish of wild yellow lilies. Inside are the
powdered bones and skulls and bits of femur of up to 300 children,
Armenian orphans of the great 1915 genocide who died of cholera and
starvation as the Turkish authorities tried to "Turkify" them in a
converted Catholic college high above Beirut. But for once, it is
the almost unknown story of the surviving 1,200 children – between
three and 15 years old – who lived in the crowded dormitory of this
ironically beautiful cut-stone school that proves that the Turks did
indeed commit genocide against the Armenians in 1915.

Barack Obama and his pliant Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton –
who are now campaigning so pitifully to prevent the US Congress
acknowledging that the Ottoman Turkish massacre of 1.5 million
Armenians was a genocide – should come here to this Lebanese hilltop
village and hang their heads in shame. For this is a tragic, appalling
tale of brutality against small and defenceless children whose families
had already been murdered by Turkish forces at the height of the First
World War, some of whom were to recall how they were forced to grind
up and eat the skeletons of their dead fellow child orphans in order
to survive starvation.

Jemal Pasha, one of the architects of the 1915 genocide, and – alas
– Turkey’s first feminist, Halide Edip Adivar, helped to run this
orphanage of terror in which Armenian children were systematically
deprived of their Armenian identity and given new Turkish names,
forced to become Muslims and beaten savagely if they were heard to
speak Armenian. The Antoura Lazarist college priests have recorded
how its original Lazarist teachers were expelled by the Turks and
how Jemal Pasha presented himself at the front door with his German
bodyguard after a muezzin began calling for Muslim prayers once the
statue of the Virgin Mary had been taken from the belfry.

Hitherto, the argument that Armenians suffered a genocide has rested
on the deliberate nature of the slaughter. But Article II of the
1951 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime
of Genocide specifically states that the definition of genocide –
"to destroy in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or
religious group" – includes "forcibly transferring children of the
group to another group". This is exactly what the Turks did in Lebanon.

Photographs still exist of hundreds of near-naked Armenian children
performing physical exercises in the college grounds. One even shows
Jemal Pasha standing on the steps in 1916, next to the young and
beautiful Halide Adivar who – after some reluctance – agreed to run
the orphanage.

Before he died in 1989, Karnig Panian – who was six years old when
he arrived at Antoura in 1916 – recorded in Armenian how his own name
was changed and how he was given a number, 551, as his identity. "At
every sunset in the presence of over 1,000 orphans, when the Turkish
flag was lowered, ‘Long Live General Pasha!’ was recited. That was
the first part of the ceremony. Then it was time for punishment for
the wrongdoers of the day. They beat us with the falakha [a rod used
to beat the soles of the feet], and the top-rank punishment was for
speaking Armenian."

Panian described how, after cruel treatment or through physical
weakness, many children died. They were buried behind the old college
chapel. "At night, the jackals and wild dogs would dig them up and
throw their bones here and there … at night, kids would run out to
the nearby forest to get apples or any fruits they could find – and
their feet would hit bones. They would take these bones back to their
rooms and secretly grind them to make soup, or mix them with grain
so they could eat them as there was not enough food at the orphanage.

They were eating the bones of their dead friends."

Using college records, Emile Joppin, the head priest at the Lazarite
Antoura college, wrote in the school’s magazine in 1947 that "the
Armenian orphans were Islamicised, circumcised and given new Arab
or Turkish names. Their new names always kept the initials of the
names in which they were baptised. Thus Haroutioun Nadjarian was
given the name Hamed Nazih, Boghos Merdanian became Bekir Mohamed,
to Sarkis Safarian was given the name Safouad Sulieman."

Lebanese-born Armenian-American electrical engineer Missak Kelechian
researches Armenian history as a hobby and hunted down a privately
printed and very rare 1918 report by an American Red Cross officer,
Major Stephen Trowbridge, who arrived at the Antoura college after
its liberation by British and French troops and who spoke to the
surviving orphans. His much earlier account entirely supports that
of Father Joppin’s 1949 research.

"Every vestige, and as far as possible every memory, of the children’s
Armenian or Kurdish origin was to be done away with. Turkish names
were assigned and the children were compelled to undergo the rites
prescribed by Islamic law and tradition … Not a word of Armenian
or Kurdish was allowed. The teachers and overseers were carefully
trained to impress Turkish ideas and customs upon the lives of the
children and to catechize [sic] them regularly on … the prestige
of the Turkish race."

Halide Adivar, later to be lauded by The New York Times as "the Turkish
Joan of Arc" – a description that Armenians obviously questioned –
was born in Constantinople in 1884 and attended an American college
in the Ottoman capital. She was twice married and wrote nine novels
– even Trowbridge was to admit that she was "a lady of remarkable
literary ability" – and served as a woman officer in Mustafa Ataturk’s
Turkish army of liberation after the First World War. She later lived
in both Britain and France.

And it was Kelechian yet again who found Adivar’s long-forgotten
and self-serving memoirs, published in New York in 1926, in which
she recalls how Jemal Pasha, commander of the Turkish 4th Army in
Damascus, toured Antoura orphanage with her. "I said: ‘You have
been as good to Armenians as it is possible to be in these hard
days. Why do you allow Armenian children to be called by Moslim [sic]
names? It looks like turning the Armenians into Moslims, and history
some day will revenge it on the coming generation of Turks.’ ‘You
are an idealist,’ he answered gravely and like all idealists lack
a sense of reality … This is a Moslem orphanage and only Moslem
orphans are allowed.’" According to Adivar, Jemal Pasha said that he
"cannot bear to see them die in the streets" and promised they would go
"back to their people" after the war.

Adivar says she told the general that: "I will never have anything
to do with such an orphanage" but claims that Jemal Pasha replied:
"You will if you see them in misery and suffering, you will go to them
and not think for a moment about their names and religion." Which is
exactly what she did.

Later in the war, however, Adivar spoke to Talaat Pasha, the architect
of the 20th century’s first holocaust, and recalled how he almost lost
his temper when discussing the Armenian "deportations" (as she put
it), saying: "Look here, Halide … I have a heart as good as yours,
and it keeps me awake at night to think of the human suffering. But
that is a personal thing, and I am here on this earth to think of my
people and not of my sensibilities … There was an equal number of
Turks and Moslems massacred during the [1912] Balkan war, yet the
world kept a criminal silence. I have the conviction that as long
as a nation does the best for its own interests, and succeeds, the
world admires it and thinks it moral. I am ready to die for what I
have done, and I know that I shall die for it."

The suffering of which Talaat Pasha spoke so chillingly was all too
evident to Trowbridge when he himself met the orphans of Antoura. Many
had seen their parents murdered and their sisters raped. Levon, who
came from Malgara, was driven from his home with his sisters aged
12 and 14. The girls were taken by Kurds – allied to the Turks – as
"concubines" and the boy was tortured and starved, Trowbridge records.

He was eventually forced by his captors into the Antoura orphanage.

Ten-year-old Takhouhi – her name means "queen" in Armenian and she was
from a rich background – from Rodosto on the Sea of Marmara was put
with her family on a freight train to Konia. Two of her two brothers
died in the truck, both parents caught typhus – they died in the arms
of Takhouhi and her oldest brother in Aleppo – and she was eventually
taken from him by a Turkish officer, given the Muslim name of Muzeyyan
and ended up in Antoura. When Trowbridge suggested that he would try
to find someone in Rodosto and return her family’s property to her,
he said she replied: "I don’t want any of those things if I cannot
find my brother again." Her brother was later reported to have died
in Damascus.

Trowbridge records many other tragedies from the children he found
at Antoura, commenting acidly that Halide "and Djemal [sic] Pasha
delighted in having their photographs taken on the steps of the
orphanage … posing as the leaders of Ottoman modernism. Did they
realise what the outside world would think of those photographs?"

According to Trowbridge’s account, only 669 of the children finally
survived, 456 of them Armenian, 184 of them Kurds, along with 29
Syrians. Talaat Pasha did indeed die for his sins. He was assassinated
by an Armenian in Berlin in 1922 – his body was later returned to
Turkey on the express orders of Adolf Hitler. Jemal Pasha was murdered
in the Turkish town of Tiflis. Halide Edip Adivar lived in England
until 1939 when she returned to Turkey, became a professor of English
literature, was elected to the Turkish parliament and died in 1964
at the age of 80.

It was only in 1993 that the bones of the children were discovered,
when the Lazarite Fathers dug the foundations for new classrooms. What
was left of the remains were moved respectfully to the little cemetery
where the college’s priests lie buried and put in a single, deep
grave. Kelechian helped me over a 5ft wall to look at this place of
sadness, shaded by tall trees. Neither name-plate nor headstone marks
their mass grave.

International Women’s Day: It’s The Sentiment That Counts

INTERNATIONAL WOMEN’S DAY: IT’S THE SENTIMENT THAT COUNTS
Larisa Paremuzyan

2 010/03/08 | 15:19

Flower vendors in Alaverdi about the slow trade today, despite it
being International Women’s Day. Mrs. Neli, who sells her colourful
flowers from a small store next to Sayat Nova Square told us that
business had dropped from previous years.

Rasident Razmik Mouradyan said he still hadn’t bought a gift for his
wife. "I’ve been running late, but I’ll pick up a few flowers for
her on the way home."

During the one hour we were in the shop only one man, Serouzhan
Hovsepyan, stepped inside looking for something to give his wife. He
added that finances were tight but that he wanted to get her something
in addition to flowers.

A young man stopped to chat with us. "Flowers, shmowers, I don’t
know what to get the wife. I gave her some money. Let her spend it
on whatever suits her fancy."

Of course, on this beautiful holiday, it’s not how many flowers one
buys, but rather the thought that counts. Even one rose, presented
with sincerity and a kind word, is more than enough to say you care.

(The first IWD was observed on February 28, 1909, in the United States
following a declaration by the Socialist Party of America)

http://hetq.am/en/society/marzer-22/

New Osce/Odihr Report

NEW OSCE/ODIHR REPORT

s17068.html
09:55:11 – 09/03/2010

Post-election trials reveal shortcomings in Armenia’s justice system,
new OSCE/ODIHR report says

WARSAW, 8 March 2010 – The conduct of the trials that took place in
the aftermath of the March 2008 post-election violence in Yerevan
reveals shortcomings in Armenia’s justice system, concludes a report
published today by the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and
Human Rights (ODIHR).

The 114-page report, based on the monitoring of 93 criminal cases
during a 16-month period, offers detailed recommendations on how to
address the identified shortcomings.

"The trials took place amid high tensions, which made the work of
courts extraordinarily difficult and at the same time raised the
bar for their professional performance to the highest levels," said
Ambassador Janez Lenarcic, ODIHR’s director.

"We hope that this report can give new impetus to the ongoing efforts
by the Armenian authorities to reform the country’s justice system
in line with international standards and OSCE commitments."

The violent clashes that erupted in Yerevan on 1-2 March 2008 between
the police and protesters demonstrating against the conduct of the
February 2008 presidential elections resulted in at least eight deaths
and numerous injuries.

Between April 2008 and July 2009, 37 ODIHR monitors observed the
trials of the individuals charged in connection with the clashes.

The report’s recommendations include limiting the use of pre-trial
detention and upholding the presumption of innocence. It also
recommends measures to ensure equality between prosecution and
defence in court and comprehensive investigations into all allegations
of torture or other ill-treatment in order to eliminate the use of
evidence obtained through illegal means. It says judges would benefit
from further training to enhance impartiality and professional conduct.

"The OSCE stands ready to assist the authorities in further advancing
justice reform in Armenia," said Lenarcic.

"We are encouraged by the open attitude we have encountered during
the trial monitoring project and value the authorities’ input in the
process of preparing the final report. It appears that some steps
are already being taken to address the identified shortcomings."

The full report is available at:

http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/politics-lraho
www.osce.org/odihr

AGMA: AGMA Announces Opening of ANI Research Library

PRESS RELEASE
Armenian Genocide Museum of America
March 8, 2010
Contact: Press Office
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (202) 383-9009

AGMA Announces Opening of ANI Research Library

Washington, DC – The Armenian Genocide Museum of America (AGMA)
announced in advance of the museum opening that the Armenian National
Institute (ANI) Research Library will be opened in time for the 95th
anniversary of the Armenian Genocide on April 24, 2010. ANI has been
part of the AGMA organization since 2003.

The support extended AGMA and ANI by donors has prompted plans to
create a research facility that may also be accessible to researchers
studying the Armenian Genocide. The special collections of books on
the topic of genocide in general and the Armenian Genocide in
particular that have been gifted to ANI already constitute a critical
component of the future museum. As a step toward encouraging further
research on the Armenian Genocide, AGMA has decided that the ANI
Research Library should be made available for public use by qualified
specialists.

"The thousands of publications that form the core of the scholarly and
documentary record on the Armenian Genocide are a critical resource
that ANI has been collecting over the years," said Van Z. Krikorian,
museum trustee and chairman of the museum’s building and operations
committee. "The AGMA planning process has depended on the services
provided by ANI to develop the exhibit concepts and contents. While
we look ahead to the time when the entire museum facility is open to
the public, we wanted to take this initial step in encouraging more
learning and academic research on the Armenian Genocide as that
constitutes one of the core missions of AGMA."

"With ANI already located at the AGMA site, we will be expanding the
Institute’s research facility and incorporate the resources that have
been gathered and that continue to arrive," added Krikorian. "ANI has
collected documentation on the Armenian Genocide from around the
world. As these records are processed and organized, we expect that
more and more of the collected resources will be available for study
and research."

"With its rapidly growing library of 8,000 volumes, the base for
creating a comprehensive collection centered on the Armenian Genocide
has been created. With more donors prepared to share their
specialized collections, and planning for a capacity of 100,000
volumes, the time had arrived to organize the ANI Research Library for
use by scholars and researchers seeking access to resources on the
Armenian experience," Krikorian said.

The ANI Research Library will be located in, and utilize three floors
of, the facilities adjacent to the historic bank building that will be
converted into the museum. "The AGMA building and operations
committee, whose members include Edele Hovnanian, Denise Darmanian,
Richard Papalian, and Zaven Tachdjian, have worked tirelessly to begin
converting the museum properties into useable spaces," added
Krikorian. "All of us are happy to take this second significant step
toward assembling the AGMA project. ANI offices were relocated to the
converted spaces in June 2009."

ANI was established in 1997 by a special grant to the Armenian
Assembly of America by the chairman of its board of trustees, Mr.
Hirair Hovnanian. The Institute is dedicated to the study, research,
and affirmation of the Armenian Genocide. As part of its public
service, ANI maintains the most extensive website on the Armenian
Genocide available on the Internet at the following address:
Since its founding the Institute has been
under the direction of Dr. Rouben Adalian, who has also directed the
AGMA project since 2008.

The Armenian Genocide Museum of America is an outgrowth of the
Armenian Assembly of America and the Armenian National Institute
(ANI), catalyzed by the initial pledge of Anoush Mathevosian toward
building such a museum in Washington, DC.

###

NR# 2010-01

www.armenian-genocide.org.