ANKARA: Swedish Parliamentary Delegation Meets Turkish IndustryMinis

Swedish Parliamentary Delegation Meets Turkish Industry Minister Coskun

Turkish Press
May 7 2005

ANKARA (AA) – Swedish Parliamentary Industry and Trade Commission
Chairperson Marie Granlund and accompanying delegation met Turkish
Industry & Trade Minister Ali Coskun in Ankara on Tuesday.

Coskun told reporters, “Turkey has met the Copenhagen criteria and
become an unproblematic country in terms of economic and political
stability,” he added.

“Turkey will also complete the Maastricht criteria until 2007.
Europe proposes long timetables for Turkey. However, we want to join
EU sooner as a full member. Turkey has been waiting for 42 years to
join the EU. We do not want to wait any more. Unfortunately, as long
as Turkey meets conditions, EU asks Turkey to meet different conditions
which have not been imposed on any other candidate countries. So-called
Armenian genocide can be shown as an example,” said Coskun.

Coskun noted, “a civil war period which happened in Ottoman Empire
is now brought onto agenda of European parliaments. Turkey supports
peace. We think that people in the world need peace. Turkey is a bridge
between Balkans and Caucasia as well as Middle East and Central Asia
and wants to have peaceful relations.”

“Trade volume between Turkey and Sweden is not at the desired
level. Foreign capital flow to Turkey which was 2.5 billion USD in
2004 will reach 5 billion USD in 2005. Foreign trade volume is 170
billion USD,” said Coskun.

Meanwhile, Swedish Commission Chairperson Granlund said that they
visited Turkey for the first time.

Granlund noted that the Prince of Sweden will visit Turkey this
year adding that also representatives of 30 Swedish companies had
recently visited Istanbul. Granlund said that they hoped that the
project between TeliaSonera and Turkcell would be implemented.

Granlund added that there are 100,000 Swedish citizens of Turkish
origin in Sweden.

Yerevan to help Armenian migrants

YEREVAN TO HELP ARMENIAN MIGRANTS
By Naira Melkumian in Yerevan

Institute for War and Peace Reporting
May 5 2005

Hundreds of thousands of Armenians working abroad enjoy little
protection. Now their government wants to improve conditions for them.

Vahan joined the massed ranks of Armenia’s expatriate workers because
he wanted a decent job abroad, but in the end he was so badly treated
in Russia that he had to come home.

“I went because I needed to earn more money to support my mother and
sister,” said Vahan, who went to Russia six months ago but recently
returned to his native Sevan in the north of Armenia.

After a long search, Vahan landed a job working for a computer centre
in Moscow. “But come my first payday, the owner told me he had no money
to pay me,” Vahan told IWPR. “Three months later he told me outright
he wasn’t going to pay me. He knew I had no local registration and
was working illegally, so I had no legal right to press my claims.”

Gagik Yeganian, who heads the migration and refugees office of the
Armenian government, told IWPR that migration needs to be better
regulated so that people like Vahan can be protected. He said the
government has made it a priority to pass a bill on labour migration
this year.

The new legislation will seek to address two sides of the problem:
enabling agreements to be drawn up with employers abroad to secure
the best possible opportunities for migrant workers; and secondly
to ensure that Armenians working in other countries are covered by
labour rights and safety rules.

Currently, Yeganian said, many migrant workers have no contract and
are entirely at the mercy of their employers when it comes to wages.

He believes it is the duty of the state to step in and try to regulate
the labour exodus.Yeganian hopes that the new law will secure the
rights of migrants at inter-governmental level, so that Armenian
embassies and consulates will have legitimate grounds to intervene
and help their nationals.

As a pilot initiative, the Armenian government signed an agreement with
Qatar in April under which 23 nurses and 27 high-tech specialists
will be travel to the Gulf state to work under pre-agreed terms
and conditions.

Armenia has experienced phenomenal levels of emigration since becoming
independent in 1991. Parliamentary deputy Viktor Dallakian recalls
that when the Soviet Union fell apart, many factories in Armenia closed
down, and because the republic is not rich in natural resources,
people took up trading or travelled abroad to seek work in order
to feed their families. Dallakian reckons that one in every three
Armenian families has at least one migrant worker among its members.

Volodya Sarkisian is typical of the long-term migrants. “I’m a trained
excavator operator,” he said. “Unable to find a job in Armenia that
would pay enough to feed my family, I have been working in Russia since
1993, travelling from town to town, wherever I get offered a job.”

The outflow was highest between 1992 and 1998. Gagik Bleyan, who heads
the employment office at the labour and social policy ministry, said
the underlying causes – lack of jobs and plummeting income levels –
were attributable to a succession of problems: the 1988 earthquake,
the Nagorny Karabakh war and the economic blockade by Azerbaijan,
and the painful transition to a market economy.

Out-migration continues to be driven by factors such as unemployment,
low wages, corruption and protectionism, Bleyan said.

He estimates that more than one million Armenians, or a quarter of
the country’s population, have left for good in the past ten years.
According to official figures released by his ministry, between 50,000
and 60,000 Armenians, or 5.5 per cent of the able-bodied population,
travel abroad as seasonal labour every year, but unofficial statistics
suggest the figure may be much higher.

A recent poll of Armenian households, conducted by the European Centre
of Advanced Social Technologies, showed that urban residents are more
likely to emigrate than rural people. In the capital Yerevan, the
annual labour drain is estimated to be around 10.5 per cent. Shirak
region in north-western Armenia, which was the worst hit by the 1988
quake, holds the lead with 33 per cent, while Armavir in the west
shows the lowest migration rate at 6.8 per cent.

Bleyan notes that the profile of the migrant workers, and also their
expectations, have changed since the Nineties. “People expect to make
more money abroad,” he said. “Computer programmers and economists
are the hottest commodity. So now we see more highly qualified labour
leaving the country than before.”

Bleyan is not alarmed by the scale of the labour drain, saying that
polls indicated that it was no higher than elsewhere in the former
Soviet Union.

Nor does he think the state should interfere, or that Armenia needs
to legislate on migrant labour. None of its former Soviet neighbours
have such a law, he added.

“Our existing labour laws regulate domestic and international
labour flows quite well,” he told IWPR. “Under the constitution,
every citizen has the right to travel abroad, and no legislation can
infringe that right.”

Yeganian at the government’s migration office takes a different view,
saying the state has an obligation to improve employment conditions
for its nationals abroad. “As Armenia is unlikely to create enough
jobs for all in the near future, the state should at least see to it
that its citizens are treated well by their employers abroad,” he said.

Ovsep Khurdushian, a consultant on economics and diaspora affairs at
the Armenian Centre for National and Strategic Studies, said migration
is unavoidable, but if the government becomes involved it would help
stimulate a gradual repatriation of labour as well as protection of
migrants’ rights abroad.

“Many people simply leave without any prospects in sight,” said
Khurdushian. “I’ve heard of one Armenian woman who sold her property
and went to Moscow with her three children. Finding no work there,
she killed her children and then herself.”

Naira Melkumian is a freelance journalist based in Yerevan.

Turkey condemned Argentina for Armenian Genocide recognition

TURKEY CONDEMNED ARGENTINA FOR ARMENIAN GENOCIDE RECOGNITION

Pan Armenian News
06.05.2005 03:12

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Censuring the Argentinean parliament for the
recognition of the Armenian Genocide this April the Turkish Foreign
Ministry issued a statement, which says in part, “While Turkey
is demonstrating good will for normalizing relations with Armenia
and proposed official Yerevan to form a joint commission for the
investigation of the fact of the Armenian Genocide this decision by the
Argentinean parliament can nothing but harm”, Yerkir Online reported.

ANKARA: Erdogan Warns Schroder about Armenian Issue

Erdogan Warns Schroder about Armenian Issue
By Erdal Sen, Isa Sezen

Zaman, Turkey
May 5 2005

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan warned German Chancellor
Gerhard Schroder over Armenian genocide allegations in a meeting in
Ankara yesterday.

Erdogan reminded Schroder of the vote to be held in the German
Parliament for the recognition of the so-called genocide and said:
“If you recognize the genocide, it would be more difficult for
many Turks in Germany to integrate in your country. Our relations,
which are currently on good terms, would be jeopardized.” Speaking
at a joint press briefing after the meeting, the German Chancellor
tried to ease anxiety over the European Constitution referendum in
France on May 29, saying, “Turkey’s European Union (EU) process is
a strategically and historically important issue. A referendum on
European Constitution in an EU country does not affect this process.”

Supporting the end of the isolation over Northern Cyprus, Schroder
explained that Turkey should continue with its reforms and the Union
should ensure membership negotiations start on time. The German
Chancellor underlined that the Adjustment Protocol of the Ankara
Agreement should be signed before October 3.

After personal and inter-delegation talks, the two leaders appeared
before the press. While the alleged Armenian genocide issue was again
on the agenda, the German Chancellor expressed that Erdogan’s proposal
of a joint research commission to study the genocide allegations is
worth looking at and he hopes that it would be accepted by Armenia
as well. Schroder indicated that the issue basically concerns Turkey
and Armenia, but that they would do every thing in their power to
help reach an agreement. He said German archives are also open and
German historians will also join this study. When asked if there is a
demand to open the Heybeliada Seminary, Schroder replied: “I would be
glad if we have reached a more advanced stage. This issue requires a
certain level of patience.” Erdogan also responded to this question,
saying, “No demands have come to me from Schroder yet. I say this very
clearly.” The German Chancellor left Ankara after his talks and flew
to Istanbul to visit Istanbul Fener Greek Patriarch Bartholomeos. He
held closed talks with the Patriarch.

Bush delegation to arrive in Tbilisi on May 9

BUSH DELEGATION TO ARRIVE IN TBILISI ON MAY 9

AZG Armenian Daily #081, 05/05/2005

Neighbors

Recently, the Georgian mass media informed that on May 9-10 the
delegation led by US President George W. Bush will arrive in
Tbilisi. Bush will hold a speech for the Georgian people at the
Tavisupleba Square. Bush will arrive in Tbilisi from Moscow where
he will participate in the arrangements of the 60th anniversary of
Victory over the Nazi in the World War II together with the leader of
dozens of other countries. Mikheil Saakashvili was to leave for Moscow,
too. But the visit of Bush to Tbilisi made changes in his schedule.

James Backer, former US State Secretary, was the first high ranked
US official who visited the South Caucasus after the collapse of the
Soviet Union. Unlike him, Bush will not arrive in Yerevan and Baku.

US military experts assessing Armenia’s army structure

US military experts assessing Armenia’s army structure

Mediamax news agency
3 May 05

Yerevan, 3 May: A group of American military experts has arrived in
Yerevan to make a defence assessment of the Armenian armed forces.

Armenian Defence Minister Serzh Sarkisyan today discussed issues
related to the mission’s work with its leader (?Col Michael Andersen)
and the US ambassador to Armenia, John Evans, the press service of
the Armenian Defence Ministry has told Mediamax.

During such missions, special attention is paid to the assessment of
the structure of the armed forces.

The US European Command carried out a defence assessment of the
Georgian armed forces in 2000.

BAKU: Armenian forces breach ceasefire in Tartar region

Azerbaijan News Service
May 2 2005

ARMENIAN FORCES BREACH CEASEFIRE IN TARTAR REGION
2005-05-02 16:53

Armed forces of Armenia in occupied Seyidsulan village of Tartar
region on May 2 fired from machine and sub-machine guns at Azerbaijani
positions in Qapanli village of the same region. Shooting lasted for
2 hours at intervals. ANS Qarabaq bureau informs there is no report
of human loss or casualties.

Kocharian did not receive new proposals from Turkish Premier

Pan Armenian News

KOCHARIAN DID NOT RECEIVE NEW PROPOSALS FROM TURKISH PREMIER

30.04.2005 03:24

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ «We did not receive any new official proposals from the
Prime Minister of Turkey, however, judging by media reports, Recep Tayyip
Erdogan does not propose anything new,» stated Victor Soghomonian, the Press
Secretary of the Armenian President, reported RFE/RL. According to Turkish
Milliyet, Erdogan stated Turkey is ready to establish diplomatic relations
with Armenia if Yerevan agrees to form a joint commission to research the
fact of the Armenian Genocide. “On the one hand, political relations could
be established. On the other hand, the work (on the archives) could
continue,’ the Turkish Premier said. It should be reminded that earlier
Erdogan sent a letter to the President of Armenia, proposing to form a group
of historians and other experts from Armenia and Turkey to research the
archives not only in Armenia and Turkey, but also third countries and
acquaint the international community with the outcomes of the research.’ In
a response letter Robert Kocharian rejected the proposal to join the
commission, suggesting to establish normal relations between the two
countries in exchange.

We must confront a culture of indifference

We must confront a culture of indifference

Washington Jewish Week
29 April 05

by Moshe Kantor

Recently I visited Babi Yar, the ravine outside Kiev where 33,771 Jews
were killed during two days of slaughter in September 1941. All told,
100,000 people lost their lives in this notorious place, most of them
Jews.

During my visit, I witnessed disconcerting scenes of indifference to
this tragic history, including teenagers playing football in a ditch,
literally running over the bones of the dead.

Too many are oblivious to history.

This collective amnesia is hardly new or surprising, but it points to
a great danger as the world once again witnesses surging anti-Semitism
and the ever-present curse of xenophobia.

At Babi Yar, the forgetfulness was encouraged by years of ruthless
Soviet rule when even the word “Jew” was rarely uttered by an official
propaganda machine that portrayed Soviet citizens, not Jews, as the
primary victims.

Acknowledgment of the special tragedy of the Jewish people was
rare. When mentioned at all, European Jewry was depicted as somehow
responsible for its own destruction.

The occasional breach in the shameful wall of silence, such as the
poet Yevgeny Yevtushenko’s poem “Babi Yar” (which Dmitry Shostakovich
set to music in his Thirteenth Symphony) felt like a breath of fresh
air in an atmosphere poisoned by lies.

As a Jew growing up in the Soviet Union, I remember very clearly that
Jews were not the only ones to sense this. Thinking people of all
nationalities throughout the Eastern Bloc were ashamed of
officialdom’s “lies through silence.”

But times have changed. Now there is a monument in Babi Yar, and
yearly services are held to pray for the victims. Meetings are held at
the site, and the president and other members of the Ukrainian
government have participated.

Still, the virus of forgetfulness eats at collective memory and
undercuts the lessons of the Holocaust.

Holocaust education is critical, but its results are too often
fleeting. Like so much of what is force-fed to students in school,
information about those terrible years is quickly forgotten.

Genuine memory is an emotion, not just a collection of facts. People
remember what they find interesting or what resonates on an emotional
level. This confirms the idea that culture is that which remains in
the consciousness once the facts have been forgotten.

Despite Holocaust education, memories of that tragedy and an
understanding of its causes have failed to take root in Europe’s
collective consciousness. People do not feel a personal or an
emotional connection to the facts they learn in well-intentioned
school programs.

The Holocaust is hardly the only example of historical forgetfulness
or indifference to the suffering of others. We see the same apathy in
response to the Armenian genocide of 1915 and to the all-too-frequent
atrocities in today’s world.

Outside the Soviet Union and a few other countries with firsthand
memories of the war, most young people and many who are not so young
have no concept of even the broad dimensions of the conflict — such
as the massive losses and critical role of the Soviet Union.

Is it any wonder they know even less of the suffering of a small
European minority?

Jews are naturally hurt, offended, and sometimes frightened by this
indifference and ignorance. That pain is compounded by the knowledge
that the Holocaust is not merely a “Jewish issue,” but one that
concerns all of humanity. If its lessons are lost, the world will face
new genocides, new horrors on a mass scale.

One of Francisco Goya’s best-known works is an etching titled “The
Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters.” But there is also the sleep of
memory, reflected in a society that has little use for the past, and
in the boys playing football on the bones of the dead.

That loss of memory can prove deadly.

The need to instill patience and tolerance for others in young people
is one of the most critical imperatives of this new century. If we
fail, we are doomed to face recurrent, irresolvable conflicts as
nationalities unavoidably come into even closer contact.

Bigotry, xenophobia and unrestrained national ambitions led to two
world wars in the last century and produced the Holocaust and other
genocides. Today’s world is more complex, but the same deadly strains
of human emotion remain extant.

Therefore, it is vital that we continue to use the Holocaust as the
most powerful example of the tragic consequences of unrestrained
xenophobia and bigotry.

We must continue to remind people of the details of that terrible time
and explain that genocide is the likely outcome when these feelings
are not curbed through education and programs that teach tolerance.

The question remains: How can we do this in a way that will
effectively touch people on an emotional level and not just feed them
quickly forgotten facts?

Popular culture plays a role. Consider the impact of films such as
Schindler’s List, The Pianist and Life Is Beautiful.

Founded earlier this year during the commemoration of the 60th
anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration
camp, the World Holocaust Forum also participates in this process. The
presidents of Israel and Poland expressed their willingness to become
forum patrons. Leaders of Russia and Ukraine are expected to
participate as well.

The forum will next meet in October 2006 to commemorate the 65th
anniversary of the slaughter in Babi Yar.

Such meetings, with their delegations of heads of state and ministers,
matter, but mostly as symbols of the political will of the
international community to serve the cause of remembrance.

More important is the ongoing, painstaking work in the schools. One
outstanding example is the European Education Program for Teachers on
the Holocaust and its lessons, organized by the World Holocaust Forum.

We have to begin with an understanding of the reality we face: That
forgetfulness and indifference to the suffering of others are part of
human nature.

Our programs are not going to change human nature. Instead, we must
find creative new ways to teach the lessons of the past and make
compelling connections to present realities.

We must convince people that these horrors are not just facts in
history texts, but things that can happen to us if we do not curb the
scourges of nationalism, xenophobia and the desire to prove the
“superiority” of one’s race.

The Holocaust remains the most graphic, powerful example of that
failure of the human spirit. We owe it to the victims to help prevent
new horrors.

The son of a Soviet soldier who served in World War II, Moshe Kantor
chairs the board of governors of the European Jewish Congress.

Divers: Armenian Genocide Commemorated in Romania

Divers Bulletin no. 15 (143) / April 25, 2005

News

ARMENIAN GENOCIDE COMMEMORATED IN ROMANIA

BUCHAREST – On April 24, Armenians in Romania celebrated 90 years since
the first genocide of the 20th century, when several hundred thousand
Armenians were killed or forced to leave their homes. “The road was full
of children, starving children, they could not go on, children thrown
away on the fields … This is a very sad story. We will forget about this
once we die and another generation comes along. But the people who
actually lived these moments cannot forget. It is impossible”,
remembered Agop Cividian, an ethnic Armenian in Romania who lived the
drama of the genocide against his people. His memories are included in
the volume “Faces of the city. Life-history in Bucharest” (author Zoltan
Rostas) and is one of the few true testimonies published in Romanian on
the tragedy 90 years ago.

The history of the Armenian genocide is not enough known, not in lack of
enough proofs but because the subject is considered touchy, especially
politically speaking.

The genocide against the Armenians was for the first time acknowledged
by Uruguay in 1965, being followed by other 13 countries, by World
Church Council, by the International People’s Courthouse, by UN
Sub-commission for human rights and by the European Parliament in 1987.
As a symbolic gesture, Holland acknowledged the genocide in December
2004, while being at the presidency of the European Union.
Government of Turkey has repeatedly denied the genocide in the past ten
years and spent important amounts of money to prove this actually had
not taken place. Turkey’s current efforts to be accepted to accede to
the European Union are somehow affected by the refusal to acknowledge
the genocide against the Armenians.

Senator Varujan Vosganian, one of the representatives of the Armenians’
Union in Romania held a speech during Senate meeting on April 18, 2005,
urging Romania to acknowledge the Armenians genocide: “Within this
humanist perspective and of democratization of the international law,
taking the example of other countries in the membership countries of the
European Union, the Parliament of Romania might start-up the procedures
to officially acknowledge the genocide in 1915”. “May this day be for
all an occasion to understand these facts cannot repeat, that nobody,
nowhere should suffer from having born a certain nationality”, concludes
Vosganian.

Author: DIVERS

——————————————–
DIVERS – News bulletin about ethnic minorities living in Romania is
edited every week by MEDIAFAX, with the financial support of King
Baudouin Foundation, Belgium and Ethnocultural Diversity Resource
Center. Partial or full reproduction of the information contained in
DIVERS is allowed only if the source is mentioned. You can send messages
and suggestions regarding the content of DIVERS bulletin at MEDIAFAX,
Str. Tudor Arghezi, Nr. 3B, Sector 2 – Bucharest, tel: 021/ 305.31.91 or
at the e-mail address: [email protected]