Turkish TV Co. devoted 5 broadcast hours to Armenian Genocide

PanArmenian News
March 16 2005

TURKISH TV COMPANY DEVOTED 5 BROADCAST HOURS TO ARMENIAN GENOCIDE
DISCUSSION

16.03.2005 04:26

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Pleif TV Turkish company has devoted 5 broadcast
hours to discussion of the issue of the Armenian Genocide, Regnum
news agency reported. Turks and Armenians were invited for the
discussion, which aimed at the Turkish party denying the Armenian
Genocide reality. The Armenian Patriarchy of Constantinople has
turned down the invitation. Armenian Protestant Church pastor Grigor
Agabaloghlu took part in the TV transmission. As reported by the
Marmara Turkish newspaper, `his speech was so courageous and stumped
Turks so much’ that historian Mehmet Saray asked the emcee: `Where
did you find this man?’

ARKA News Agency – 03/14/2005

ARKA News Agency
March 14 2005

RA Chamber of Advocates to hold constituent Assembly on March 19-20

Submission of works for State Prize in Literature and Art begins in
Armenia

`Armenia today: EXPO 2005′ exhibition to be held in Tbilisi

********************************************************************

RA CHAMBER OF ADVOCATES TO HOLD CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY ON MARCH 19-20

YEREVAN, March 14. /ARKA/. The RA Chamber of Advocates is to hold its
constituent Assembly in Yerevan on Mach 19-20, the pres service of
the American Barrister Association (ABA/CEELI reported. The goal of
the assembly is the formation of the Chamber of Advocates. The
assembly is to elect the Chamber Chairman, Council, disciplinary and
qualifying commissions and head of the office of public advocates.
The assembly is also to approve the rules and ethical behaviour for
advocates.
ABA/CEELI launched its activities in Armenia in 1996. The program is
aimed at strengthening advocates’ independence, expanding
opportunities for legal education, enhancing public awareness of
their rights. ABA/CEELI is also involved in drafting legal acts,
judicial reforms and reforms of criminal law. P.T. -0–

********************************************************************

SUBMISSION OF WORKS FOR STATE PRIZE IN LITERATURE AND ART BEGINS IN
ARMENIA

YEREVAN, March 14. /ARKA/. Five Armenian Commissions for state prizes
in literature and art have stated the submission of works for the
State Prize in Literature and Art. The Ra presidential press service
reports that prizes will be awarded in literature, journalism, music,
fine arts, theatre, and cinema, architecture and urban development.
Literary works can be submitted to the Commission by the authors,
creative unions, as well as by other organizations. The commission
will consider works first published after September 1, 2003. An
applicant for the contest has to have three written expert
recommendations, as well as brief information on the author and his
research activities.
The works are to be submitted to the Commissions before September 1,
2005. The winner will receive certificates, breastplates and AMD
2.5mln bonuses ($1= AMD 469.06).P.T. –0 –

********************************************************************

`ARMENIA TODAY: EXPO 2005′ EXHIBITION TO BE HELD IN TBILISI

YEREVAN, March 14. /ARKA/. A national exhibition of Armenian goods
and services `Armenian today: Expo 2005′ is to be held in Tbilisi,
Georgia, on April 21-23. The press service of the LOGOS EXPO Center
reports that the main goal of the exhibition is the expansion of the
export potential of Armenian enterprises, establishment of mutually
advantageous business contacts with Georgian businessmen, foundation
of joint ventures, establishment closer relations with the Armenian
community in Georgia. The organizers of the first national exhibition
of Armenian goods and services in Georgia are convinced that it will
contribute to the export of Armenian goods, create ampler
opportunities for entering the Georgian market and consolidate
regional ties. `This exhibition will become an excellent arena for
closer ties between the two economies,’ the press release says.
The exhibition is expected to be visited by the managers of Georgia’s
large enterprises, government officials in charge of the
corresponding industries, representatives of the Armenian diaspora
and others.
By March 14, 2004, a total of 38 companies have applied for
participate in the exhibition. The exhibition is expected to occupy
an area of 450sq. meters. The main subjects of the exhibition are
food products and beverages, machine-tool construction,
stone-working, jewelry and chemical industries, machine-construction
and instrument-making, electronics, building materials, paints, cargo
transportation, tourism. The exhibition is to be held under the
auspices of the RA Ministry of Trade and Economic Development, with
the official sponsorship of the RA Foreign Ministry and Union of
Manufacturers and Businessmen (Employers). P.T. -0–

Specialists Of Intel Technologies Corporation To Implement Education

SPECIALISTS OF INTEL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION TO IMPLEMENT
EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS IN UNIVERSITIES OF YEREVAN

YEREVAN, MARCH 11, NOYAN TAPAN. The specialists of the Intel
Technologies Corporation (US) will hold ” Intel computer knowledge
days” at the State Engineering University on March 15-17. The director
general of the Unicomp company Armen Baldrian told NT correspondent
that computers assembled on the basis of Intel Pentium 4 processor
by Hyper-Trading technology, as well as notebooks by Intel Centrino
technology will be displayed to the students. Seminars on Wi-Fi and
Wi-Max wireless technologies and laboratory classes will be condicted
for students as well. A.Baldrian noted that the Armenian students
take much interest in the educational programs, that is why novelties
of the high and information technologies sphere are presented to the
future specialists within the framework of such programs, and similar
events will also be held this year at Yerevan State University and
the Russian-Armenian (Slavonic) University.

BAKU: Azerbaijan keen on continuation of World Food Prgm Humanitaria

AzerTag, Azerbaijan
March 11 2005

AZERBAIJAN KEEN ON CONTINUATION OF WORLD FOOD PROGRAM HUMANITARIAN
ASSISTANCE
[March 11, 2005, 11:36:17]

With the purpose to improve the state of health and nourishment of
the internally displaced people (IDP) Azerbaijan is interested in
continuation of the humanitarian assistance on the part of the World
Food Program. It was stated at the meeting of vice-premier, chairman
of the republican commission on international humanitarian assistance
Ali Hasanov with regional director of the World Food Program of the
United Nations (UN WFP) on the Near East, Central Asia and the
Eastern Europe Emir Abdullah.

Vice-premier, assessed productive activity of the Azerbaijan office
WPP functioning already for 12 years, has noted, that this
representative international program has started to work in the
heaviest for our country days when the Armenian military forces
occupied a number of regions of Azerbaijan and the peaceful
Azerbaijan population suddenly has turned to IDPs. For last years, by
the Program, food aid in volume of 90 thousand tons for amount of 60
million dollars has been rendered to the IDPs and needy layers of the
population. Within the framework of the food assistance program for
140 thousand of IDPs, accepted by Board of Directors in 2002, up to
the end of 2005 the help will be allocated at amount of 20 million
dollars. In May current year, mission of the Program, which will
familiarize with needs of the IDPs in regions, should arrive in
Azerbaijan.

Besides it, according to the realized programs in this year, it is
planned to allocate means at amount of 7 million dollars and 14
thousand tons of food aid. But, unfortunately, till now the sum on
purchase only 3 thousand tons of the foodstuffs has been allocated.
As noted Ali Hasanov, during the meeting of the President of
Azerbaijan with acting head of the World Food Program Mr. John Powell
had been mentioned questions of continuation of the project within 2
years.

At the meeting, also has been informed that the plight of the
Azerbaijan refugees has found reflection in the “Report on food
safety and estimation of nourishment”, conducted by the American
organization “Relief International” under the initiative of the
Program.

Sudan genocide felt at university

Sudan genocide felt at university

by Lindsey Brown
DM Staff Reporter
March 09, 2005

Gabriel Panchol saw a bomb dropped on his cousin when they were
fleeing violence in Sudan.

Panchol, an Ole Miss student, said he witnessed many other atrocities
and faced obstacles on his road to the university. He left the
country in 1987 when he was 7 and walked a thousand miles to a
refugee camp in Ethiopia.

â~@~We would walk day by day so we mostly walked at night,â~@~]
Panchol said. â~@~There was no water in the daytime, so we got
thirsty, but it was dangerous to walk at night. You see those wild
animals over there.

â~@~You cry, but thereâ~@~Ys no help.â~@~]

Panchol, a junior accounting major, said he finds the state-supported
mass killing in the region of Darfur appalling.

â~@~In Darfur they are killing women, children and old ones who
donâ~@~Yt even know their enemies; they are helpless,â~@~] Panchol
said.

Panchol was shuffled in and out of refugee camps for several years,
before a stroke of luck landed him at the university. Four years ago,
he became part of a group known as â~@~The Lost Boysâ~@~] who were a
part of U.N. relief project to get Sudanese refugees out of the
camps.

The Sudanese Government is using Arab militias called
â~@~Janjaweeds,â~@~] which are an air force, to deliberately and
systematically kill the non-Arab Sudanese of Darfur, an area the size
of Texas.

According to reports released by the U.S. State Department, the
attacks on villages start with bombing from Sudanese combat aircraft
or helicopters. Then, militia men on horses or camels and government
troops in military vehicles attack with automatic weapons and grenade
launchers.

The men and boys of the villages are typically dragged from their
homes and shot, women are often gang-raped. Livestock is stolen and
property taken by those invading. The militia burn the village to the
ground as those trying to escape are bombed by aircraft.

Villages are repeatedly attacked to eliminate the possibility that
the displaced could ever rebuild their lives.

On Sept. 9, after two years of violence, then U.S. Secretary of State
Colin Powell declared the brutal attacks in Darfur a genocide, which
is a deliberate extermination of an entire people.

In a report called, â~@~Documenting Atrocities in Darfur,â~@~]
Powell called the Darfur situation, â~@~the worst humanitarian and
human rights crisis in the world today.â~@~]

One woman interviewed by the State Department said she was raped
repeatedly in front of her father and was then forced to watch as her
father was dismembered by the militia.

Panchol said the Sudanese government began to enforce Islamic law
called Shariâ~@~Ya law on all citizens, regardless of their religion.
People living in the Darfur region were accountable to this law, even
though a majority of the citizens are not Islamic.

Islamic law contains the rules the Muslim world uses to govern. It
forms the basis for relations between man and God and the rules by
which a Muslim society is organized and governed.

The brutal oppression, ethnic cleansing and genocide sponsored by the
Sudanese government left the people of Darfur with no other option
for survival than organizing a group for political and military
resistance.

The resistance to the Islamic law led to the Sudan Liberation
Movement and its military, the Sudan Liberation Army.

In response to the Sudan Liberation Armyâ~@~Ys resistance, the
Sudanese government began their â~@~scorched earthâ~@~] policy of
burning villages and killing those living there.

United Nations report 70,000 people have been killed in Sudan, but
the death toll may be four or five times higher.

The violence left an additional 1.7 million people displaced from
their homes with two hundred thousand of those displaced in
neighboring Chad.

According to the New York Times, a classified African Union archive
on the genocide the Sudanese government asked for the sponsored
militia to, â~@~Change the demography of Darfur and make it void of
African Tribes,â~@~] by means of, â~@~killing, burning villages and
farms, terrorizing people, confiscating property from members of
African tribes and forcing them from Darfur.â~@~]

A class taught this spring at Ole Miss on the topic of genocide has
encouraged a group students to work towards awareness about the
genocide taking place in Darfur.

The class is cross-listed between the history and political science
department and is taught by John Winkle, political science professor
and Robert Haws, chair of the history department.

â~@~The class became interested in this project when an author who
spoke on this subject told us about a group of students at Swarthmore
College in Pennsylvania, who have pledged to raise one million
dollars for genocide relief in Darfur,â~@~] said Roun McNeal, an Ole
Miss sophomore.

â~@~We in the class we felt a moral responsibility to do something
with them,â~@~] McNeal said. â~@~The war in Iraq and the tsunami in
Southeast Asia have sent Darfur to the backseat, as far as American
policy is concerned, therefore, the responsibility is in the hands of
the American people.â~@~]

The students contacted Sudan native Omer Ismail to address the Oxford
community. Ismail will speak tomorrow covering the horrors of
genocide in Darfur and Americaâ~@~Ys reaction.

Ismail, born in western Sudan, is the former minister of foreign
affairs in Sudan.

He was forced to flee Sudan when the National Islamic Front took
power in 1989 and has since lived as a refugee in the United States.
Ismail helped found the Sudan Democratic Forum, a group of Sudanese
working for advancement of democracy in Sudan and now resides in
Maryland.

â~@~In general, the American people associate genocide, almost
solely, with the Holocaust. However, genocide did not start or end
with the Holocaust. The Armenian genocide during World War I in
Turkey killed 1.5 million.â~@~]

In the 1970s, Cambodian Dictator Pol Pot oversaw the killing of over
2 million of that countryâ~@~Ys population of 6 million.

â~@~Ethnic cleansing took place in the 1990s in Rwanda, Somolia and
Kosovo. The Holocaust is not the entirety of the book â~@~S a book
that, unfortunately, remains unfinished,â~@~] McNeal said.

McNeal said he hopes the lecture will facilitate awareness within the
Oxford community.

â~@~As a beacon for freedom, America, and in this case its citizens,
have a moral responsibility to contact our legislatures, donate to
humanitarian organizations and persuade others to do the same.â~@~]

â~@~Ismail is so knowledgeable on this situation, itâ~@~Ys crucial
for the community to come listen and learn about what they can
do.â~@~]

Panchol stressed the importance of putting pressure on the American
government. He said more discussion about the genocide in Darfur is
necessary.

In addition to the lecture by Ismail, students in the genocide class
are studying multiple fund raising ideas, as well as trying to
involve alumni.

Ismailâ~@~Ys lecture covering genocide in Darfur will take place
tomorrow at 6 p.m. in Croft building, room 107.

â~@~People really are the same. They are also human beings,â~@~]
Panchol said. â~@~Itâ~@~Ys our responsibility to help them.â~@~]

–Boundary_(ID_e/ldtjslbSLT0zQevsUpug)–

Armenia commander on cooperation with Russia border guards

ITAR-TASS News Agency
TASS
March 4, 2005 Friday

Armenia commander on cooperation with Russia border guards

MOSCOW

The commander of the Armenian National Security Service’s border
troops said on Friday that cooperation between the border guards of
Armenia and Russia should continue after Russian border guards
completed their mission in Armenia and transferred the sections they
had protected to Armenian border guards.

Colonel Vyacheslav Voskanyan expressed satisfaction over cooperation
between the border guards of the two states. In an interview with the
Russian newspaper Krasnaya Zvezda, he said cooperation “is important
from the point of view of joint fight against present-day threats to
the humankind as well as for maintaining and strengthening of
fraternal relations”.

“Cooperation between the border guards of our two states is at its
best,” the colonel stressed. “It is based on friendship and mutual
assistance in all spheres of activity. We have a common task – to
ensure security of Russia and Armenia,” the military specialist
added.

He reminded the readers that Armenia is one of the few former Soviet
republics, which has not rejected Russia’s help in border protection.
In line with an agreement signed between Moscow and Yerevan on
September 30, 1992, Russian border guards protect the Turkish and
part of the Iranian border section of the Armenian state border, as
well as maintain border control at Yerevan’s Zvartnots airport. All
in all, Russian border guards control 400 kilometers of the Armenian
border.

Sources from the FSB border service told Itar-Tass on Friday that any
amendments to the treaty on the status of Russian border troops in
Armenia and terms of their functioning could be introduced through
the two countries’ foreign ministries. So far, Yerevan has made no
official offers concerning the term of the stationing of Russian
border guards in Armenia.

In case Russian border guards pulled out from Armenia at the request
of that country, groups of inspectors and instructors could be set up
as one of the variants of cooperation. They could assist Armenia in
the strengthening of its border service, the sources said.

Turkey Is No More Azerbaijan’s `Hostage’?

TURKEY IS NO MORE AZERBAIJAN’S `HOSTAGE’?

Azat Artsakh – Nagorno Karabakh Republic (NKR)
03 March 05

The society in Karabakh holds the opinion that Azerbaijan and Turkey
cannot have controversies in foreign policy. This opinion formed due
to Ankara’s support of Baku’s standpoint in the settlement of the
Karabakh conflict. However, it would not be correct to argue that
everything is smooth in the Turkish-Azerbaijani relationships, as well
as in reference to our conflict with Azerbaijan. Still Abulfaz
Elchibey was disappointed with Turkey’s policy on Armenia and Nagorni
Karabakh, who relied on the military assistance of Ankara in the war
provoked by him in 1992. However, Elchibey’s hopes did not come
true. Moreover, to Baku’s surprise, although defending Azerbaijan in
the question of Karabakh, Ankara let the Baku authorities know that
they were interested in establishing normal relationships with
Armenia. Thus, in the same year of 1992 the foreign minister of Turkey
then Hikmet Chetin announced that Ankara was willing to set up
diplomatic relationships with Yerevan at the condition that the latter
showed `good will’ towards Azerbaijan. This `good will’ was, in
Turkey’s opinion, withdrawal of Karabakh forces backed by Armenia from
Shushi and Lachin yet holding control over the rest of the territory
of Nagorni Karabakh. The administration of the former president of
Armenia Levon Ter-Petrossian could not take such a step. Instead, in
order to show that Yerevan was willing to setup diplomatic
relationships with Ankara Levon Ter-Petrossian stood up against the
claim of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation on the necessity of
recognition of the Republic of Nagorni Karabakh by Armenia. In answer
to this Turkey agreed to supply 100 thousand tons of grain to Armenia,
as well as secretly signed an agreement with Armenia on supply of
electricity. However, this agreement was not brought to being. The
reason was the reaction of Baku which, nevertheless, learned about the
secret Turkish-Armenian agreement called`protocol on electric
energy’. The Azerbaijani foreign minister then Tofik Kasumov evaluated
the Turkish-Armenian agreement as a stab in the back. In addition to
this, the Turkish opposition heavily criticized the policy of official
Ankara. Asa result in November 1992 Turkish authorities had to annul
the `protocol on electric energy’. There is another interesting
fact. At the beginning of April 1993 when the Karabakh forces set foot
on the region of Kelbajar, the Azerbaijani president Abulfaz Elchibey
turned to Ankara with the request of evacuating the civilians of the
region by Turkish helicopters. However, the prime ministerof Turkey
Suleiman Demirel refused to help Azerbaijan fearing direct involvement
of his country in the conflict, as well as confrontation with
Moscow. The only thing Ankara could do at that time was to forbid
shipment of humanitarian aid through the airspace of Turkey. In the
following years too, there were controversies in the
Turkish-Azerbaijani relationships. This kind of behaviour on the part
of Turkey is described first of all by the fact that regulation ofthe
Turkish-Armenian relationships would play a significant role in more
effective penetration of Turkey into Azerbaijan, and later the newly
independent countries of Central Asia. Besides, later the West
appealed to Turkey to normalize relationships with Armenia as a
condition for Turkey’s membership to the European Union. After the
election of Ahmet Nejet Sezer president of Turkeythe
Turkish-Azerbaijani relationships took a real test. The actions of the
new head of the Turkish state showed that he aimed to take his country
out of the situation of Azerbaijan’s `political hostage’, in which it
appeared because of the Nagorni Karabakh conflict and the striving to
build the oil pipeline which would become the main export route of the
Caspian oil to the West through Azerbaijan. These two issues were
closely interwoven in the Turkish =80` Azerbaijani relationships,
because Heidar Aliev hoped that in answer to the choice of the route
Baku-Tbilisi-Geihan (Turkey) Ankara would lobby the ideas of
military-political and economic pressure on Armenia aiming to make
Yerevan surrender in the Karabakh issue, and second, would get
Turkey’s support in passing power in Azerbaijan to his son Ilham
Aliev. The former Turkish president Suleiman Demirel tended to conduct
just the same policy which greatly determined the friendly
relationships between the leaders of the two states. However, as it
was mentioned above, the Turkish policy of not accepting Armenia did
not correspond to the interests of the West, first of all
Washington. In this reference it is interesting to know the opinion of
one of the leading American experts on Turkey and Iran Graham Fuller
representing the `RAND Corporation’.In his article entitled `Grand
Geopolitics for New Turkey’ Mr. Fuller mentioned that in its Caucasian
policy Turkey should face Armenia. According to the author of the
article, today Armenia is Russia’s hostage because of its fear of
Turkish blockade and its dependence on Moscow in the questions of its
security. Therefore, the American political scientist advised Turkey
to improve its relationships with Europe, which would relieve
Armenia’s fears providing itself with an alternative way to Europe and
will offer new opportunities for the settlement of the Karabakh
issue. Ahmet Nejet Sezer and his government could not but take into
consideration the moods of the West. But how to explain Turkey’s
liberation from the pressure of alliance with Azerbaijan? The chance
arose after Heidar Aliev, according to Ankara, gave too weak a
reaction to the recognition of the Armenian genocide in Ottoman Turkey
by France in January 2001. `If Aliev can negotiate with its own enemy
Armenia through Turkey’s enemy France,why cannot Turkey do the same?’
asked famous Turkish publicist Fatih Altaili in the influential
Turkish newspaper `Hyuriet’. The relationships of the two countries
deteriorated after Ilham Aliev took the office in Azerbaijan. First
the Azerbaijani president was discontent with Turkey’s announcement
about their willingness to set up diplomatic relationships with
Armenia and opening joint check pointsat the Turkish-Armenian
border. In answer to this Ilham Aliev aroused the anger of Turkish
authorities endorsing the variant of settlement of the issue of Cyprus
which did not favour Ankara. Then, for the aim of repayment of the
accrued debts Turkey arrested Azerbaijani ships. At the same time
under the guise of struggle against tax avoidance biased checking of
the activity of a number of Turkish companies working in this country
was launched. After this historians got into a fight. Thus, doctor of
history Farid Alekperov announced in his article that the alliance
between Lenin and Ataturk put an end to the independent state of
Azerbaijan in 1918-1920. The former foreign political adviser Vafa
Guluzadeh also accused Turkey of betrayal in those years. The
Azerbaijani journalists also did not abstain from making
accusations. For example, Elmira Akhundova in her article `Dispelled
Illusions’ literally stated, `The senior brother Turk showed the
entire world that he places his personal interests above
everything. And he will never give up his interests, even if he owes
his junior blood brother after lasting separation=80¦ So it is high
time to realize that we have no `brothers’ abroad. There are
companions, mutually favourable interests, not more. And all the
judgements about a `unified nation’ are a mere romantic veil for their
striving to present the desirable instead of the real.’ And in one of
the May 2004 issues of the newspaper `Zerkalo’ ofBaku wrote the
following. `Once again it should be emphasized that an open
anti-Turkish campaign was launched in Azerbaijan,’ states the
newspaper, =80=9Cit should be predicted that sooner of later it will
provoke the negative attitude of the political circles of Turkey. If
the number of people involved in the Turkish authorities interested in
breaking relationships with Azerbaijan grows, it may turn into a
disaster for us.’ `There is an impression that the Turkish prime
minister R. Erdoghan and the president of Azerbaijan are not `on
brotherly terms’ at all, ‘ supposed famous Azerbaijani journalist Rauf
Mirkadirov. Although recently the Turkish – Azerbaijani relationships
seem to have ameliorated, it does not mean that all the obstructions
in these relationships have been eliminated, including in the foreign
political sphere. At least because after on Azerbaijan will again
demand from Turkey not to establish any relationships with Armenia,
which does not correspond to the interests of Turkey for the following
reasons: a) the vacuum in the Turkish – Armenian relationships hinders
Ankara’s plans of military-political and economic penetration into the
entire South Caucasus; b) the unequivocal endorsement of Baku’s
standpoint in the Karabakh issue does not allow Turkey (because of the
counteraction of Yerevan and Baku) to play one of the important roles
in the mediating mission for the settlementof the problem of Nagorni
Karabakh, which would strengthen the influence of Turkey in the
region; c) the absence of normal Turkish – Armenian relationships
inevitably results in the growing military cooperation between Armenia
and Russia, which is perceived by Turkey as a direct threat to its
security; d) internal confrontation between Ankara and Yerevan favours
the regional opponent of Turkey – Islamic Iran; e) the above mentioned
circumstances contradict to the regional interests of the strategic
ally of Ankara, Washington which seeks to oust Russia from the South
Caucasus and prevent Iranian influence there. Summing up, we may
suppose that the development of Turkish – Azerbaijani relationships
will go on according to the Turkish plan. Most probably this
circumstance will come forth after the opening of the pipeline Baku –
Tbilisi =80` Geihan this year. Probably later we shall witness
dissatisfaction of the Baku authorities with the Azerbaijani policies
of Turkey.

ALEXANDER GRIGORIAN.
03-03-2005

Armenian parliament approves re-appointment of Central Bank chief

Armenian parliament approves re-appointment of Central Bank chief

Mediamax news agency
2 Mar 05

Yerevan, 2 March: The Armenian parliament today endorsed Tigran
Sarkisyan as chairman of the Central Bank of the republic.

Eighty-six MPs voted for and four against Tigran Sarkisyan’s
candidature, our Mediamax correspondent reports from parliament.

Thus, Tigran Sarkisyan, who has headed the Central Bank since March
1998, will remain in this post for the next seven years.

Global Tobacco Treaty Takes Effect

Yahho
Finance

Press Release

Source: Corporate Accountability International

Global Tobacco Treaty Takes Effect

Monday February 28, 7:45 am ET
Government Officials and Health Advocates Overcome Years of Tobacco Industry
Lobbying and Interference
On Historic Occasion, NGOs Call on Bush Administration to Act on Treaty and
Join Global Community

GENEVA, Feb. 28 /PRNewswire/ — At a ceremony organized by the World Health
Organization (WHO), government officials and health advocates gather in
Geneva today to celebrate the global tobacco treaty’s entry into force.
Formally known as the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the
treaty took effect yesterday, 27 February 2005. Initiated by WHO to address
the global tobacco epidemic, the treaty bans tobacco advertising, promotion
and sponsorship, and protects public health policy from tobacco industry
interference.
“This treaty will save millions of lives, change the way giant tobacco
corporations operate, and set an international precedent for prioritizing
health over the interests of Big Business,” says Kathryn Mulvey, Executive
Director of Corporate Accountability International (formerly Infact).

Across the globe, corporate accountability and health advocates are marking
this historic milestone with public events, and calling on their governments
to ratify and implement the treaty. Members of the Network for
Accountability of Tobacco Transnationals (NATT) in more than 15 countries
around the world, including Colombia, El Salvador, Ghana, Kenya, Mauritius,
Malaysia, Sri Lanka, and the US, are generating momentum behind the treaty
as it becomes international law.

In a protest outside the White House last Friday, activists shamed the Bush
Administration for its failure to submit the FCTC to the US Senate for
ratification. The US signed the FCTC in May 2004, but remains notably absent
from the list of countries that have ratified. Throughout negotiations, the
US took positions that would benefit tobacco giants like Philip
Morris/Altria. The US has a long history of signing but not ratifying
international humanitarian agreements.

“February 2005 is a landmark month for international cooperation on critical
issues of protecting people and our natural resources, and the US is missing
the boat. As both the global tobacco treaty and the Kyoto Protocol take
effect with the US on the sidelines, we are calling on our government to
join with the global community in prioritizing people’s lives over the
profits of giant corporations,” says Mulvey.

The 57 countries that have ratified the FCTC are: Armenia, Australia,
Bangladesh, Bhutan, Botswana, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Cook Islands,
Denmark, Fiji, Finland, France, Germany, Ghana, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland,
India, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Latvia, Lesotho, Lithuania, Madagascar,
Maldives, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mauritius, Mexico, Mongolia, Myanmar,
Nauru, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Pakistan, Palau, Panama, Peru,
Qatar, San Marino, Senegal, Seychelles, Singapore, Slovakia, Solomon
Islands, Spain, Sri Lanka, Syria, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Trinidad and
Tobago, Turkey, the United Kingdom, Uruguay and Viet Nam. Many more
ratifications are expected in the coming months.

Corporate Accountability International, formerly Infact, is a membership
organization that protects people by waging and winning campaigns
challenging irresponsible and dangerous corporate actions around the world.
For over 25 years, we’ve forced corporations-like Nestle, General Electric
and Philip Morris/Altria-to stop abusive actions. Corporate Accountability
International, an NGO in Official Relations with the World Health
Organization (WHO), played a key role in development of the FCTC. The
Network for Accountability of Tobacco Transnationals (NATT) includes more
than 100 NGOs from over 50 countries working for a strong, enforceable
Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. For more information visit

Contacts:
Patti Lynn
Mobile phone in Geneva: +41.76.547.3476

Kathryn Mulvey
Mobile phone in Geneva: +1.617.306.0920

David Lerner/Riptide Communications
+1.212.260.5000

Source: Corporate Accountability International

http://www.stopcorporateabuse.org.

ANKARA: Kurkcuoglu: Play Khojaly against Armenian Genocide

Anadolu Agency
Feb 26 2005

Kurkcuoglu: Historians’ Recording Khojaly Massacre As A Crime Against
Humanity Will Be The Best Answer To Allegations Of So-called Armenian
Genocide
By Anadolu Agency
Published: 2/26/2005
TurkishPress.com

ERZURUM – Associate Prof. Erol Kurkcuoglu, director of the Ataturk
University Turkish-Armenian Relations Study Center, said on Saturday
that historians’ recording Khojaly massacre as a crime against
humanity would be the best answer to the allegations of so-called
Armenian genocide.

Releasing a statement on the 13th anniversary of the massacre,
Kurkcuoglu recalled, ”Azerbaijani town of Khojaly (Xocali) became a
symbol of unprecedented brutality against peaceful civilians and
crimes against humanity. On February 26th, 1992, Armenian armed
forces massacred 613 civilians including 106 women and 63 children
and destroyed the town in what the Human Rights Watch called ‘the
largest massacre to date in the conflict’. They also took 1,275
Azerbaijani people hostage.”

”Three days after the massacre, Chingiz Mustafayev, the cameraman of
K-25 Studio, filmed the aftermath of what happened in Khojaly
together with foreign journalists. The film revealed that those who
were massacred by Armenians, were innocent civilians,” he said.

Kurkcuoglu added that historians’ recording Khojaly massacre as a
crime against humanity would be the best answer to the allegations of
so-called Armenian genocide.