Baku: Madrid Principles Not To Be Changed

BAKU: MADRID PRINCIPLES NOT TO BE CHANGED

news.am
March 15 2010
Armenia

The Madrid Principles must not be changed, Novruz Mammadov, Head of the
Foreign Relations Department, Azerbaijani Presidential Administration,
said in his interview with news website owned by the Yeni Azerbaijan
(New Azerbaijan) Party.

"The wording of the Madrid Principles is the same, but the term
&’revised’ makes them sound somewhat different. The point is
insignificant changes in the principles, which we are discussing.

Anything new can be said after the Armenian side’s position is clear.

So we have to wait a little," Mammadov said.

According to him, the Madrid principles are not Azerbaijan’s position.

"The proposals were prepared by the West, that is, by the co-chairs.

At the initial stage Azerbaijan was not satisfied with the principles.

We added some proposals to the principles. We actually approved them
after 18-month discussions. If you remember the situation a few years
ago, you will see the Armenian side welcomed the Madrid principles.

But a most strange situation developed – Azerbaijan approved the
Madrid principles after long-lasting discussions, but Armenia changed
its position."

Armenian Traffic Police Wrapping Up Its Traffic Regulation Campaign

ARMENIAN TRAFFIC POLICE WRAPPING UP ITS TRAFFIC REGULATION CAMPAIGN

ARKA
March 15, 2010

YEREVAN, March 15. /ARKA/. Armenian traffic police will wrap up its
traffic regulation campaign by late March, Armenian Traffic Police
Chief Markar Ohanyan said at a press conference on Thursday.

He said this campaign produces certain results -things improved on
some hard sports in Yerevan.

Ohanyan said that the traffic police will continue barring drivers
from pulling their buses and minibuses up anywhere.

Personal car drivers will be fined for parking on improper places.

Pedestrians who violate rules while crossing roads won’t be left
unpunished as well.

Ohanyan said that 210 traffic wardens and 75 members of a special
group watch the traffic every day.

He said that the traffic police intended to launch another campaign.

Traffic wardens will keep their eye on drivers to fine them for
smoking while driving cars and for throwing empty bottles and other
garbage from their windows.

One Nation, One Culture Pan-Armenian Festival Kicked Off

ONE NATION, ONE CULTURE PAN-ARMENIAN FESTIVAL KICKED OFF

Aysor
March 15 2010
Armenia

The IV Pan-Armenian ‘One Nation, One Culture" Festival has been kicked
off Monday, promising to bring together thousands of Armenians from
all sides of the world to celebrate Independence Days of Armenia
and Nagorno-Karabakh.

The Festival will be held all the year round, including in its
framework contests, exhibitions, concerts, cultural events, meetings,
forums, etc. Included in the cultural events are anniversaries of
Ruben Sevak (125th) and Hovhannes Shiraz (95th).

"There will be held Days of Armenian Art of Performing, followed by
the Theater Tour and the Week of Media," added Armenia’s Minister of
Diaspora Mrs. Hranush Hakobian.

The Festival is reported to close in mid-October.

ANKARA: Armenia Politics Divided Over Increasing Debt

ARMENIA POLITICS DIVIDED OVER INCREASING DEBT

Hurriyet Daily News
March 12 2010
Turkey

The Armenian government has defended its debt saying the borrowing
is needed to keep the economy on an even keel. Opposition parties,
however, fear the government has taken on too much debt in its efforts
to support the economy during the global crisis. Experts warns that
the external debt will deepen

Georgia’s pro-Western President Mikhail Saakashvili (L) speaks with
Armenian President Serge Sarkisian during their meeting in Batumi,
Georgia. AFP photo.

Armenia’s opposition parties fear the government has taken on too much
debt in its efforts to support the economy during the global crisis,
the Institute for War & Peace Reporting, or IWPR, reported on its
Web site.

Armenia has been hit hard by the downturn as its economy shrank roughly
15 percent in 2009. The government said the collapse would have been
even more dramatic had it not boosted spending by borrowing so heavily.

"When business is playing a passive role in the economy, the state
must, in turn, take on the role of trying to maintain a level economy.

If we had not done this, the situation would be a lot worse,
qualitatively worse," said Finance Minister Tigran Davtyan.

Roughly 90 percent of the state debt is to external parties. By the end
of 2009, the debt had come to 36 percent of gross domestic product,
or nearly $2.5 billion. Some 43 percent is owed to the World Bank
and roughly 20 percent to Russia; the International Monetary Fund
is also a significant creditor. According to the Dashnaktsutyun,
an opposition party, external debt will rise to $3.5 billion by the
end of this year or 43 percent of GDP.

Others are also forecasting an increasingly dangerous debt burden.

Aristomene Varudakis, head of the World Bank’s Yerevan office, said by
the end of 2011, external debt will equal 50 percent of GDP, up from
just 13 percent in 2008. Criticism has grown in recent months over
the swelling debt levels, particularly a $500 million credit to Russia
which was not categorized as aid but as a commercial transaction.

"Our dangerous debts are commercial. The debts of the IMF and the
World Bank are not big. You can take one billion dollars in debt, but
servicing this debt can cost a tenth of the commercial debt that the
state is taking out," according to Hrant Bagratyan, a former prime
minister who later became an opposition figure.

Although there are no official, published figures, he is also critical
of how expensive debt servicing is set to become. "In 2008, Armenia
paid eight million dollars to service its external debt, but in 2013
the sum to be paid will be 478 million dollars. That means in a few
years time we will be spending twice as much on servicing debt as we
spend on the army, which even now we can’t maintain," he said.

The deputy head of the central bank, Vahce Gabrielyan, was one of
many officials who tried to calm the critics. "It is probable that
we will restructure our external debt, but this does not mean we will
end up with bad conditions or come under political pressure," he said.

Bagratyan, however, was most concerned about such "political
pressure." He worried that, having taken out these giant debts, Armenia
might be forced to make concessions – such as in its stand-off with
Azerbaijan over the status of Nagorno-Karabakh – if it fails to pay
for them.

"The situation is just catastrophic. If this goes on, then in a year
we will ourselves be asking for a solution to the Karabakh problem
that we are currently rejecting," he said.

Independent analyst Samvel Avagyan, a columnist for the daily Capital,
a financial newspaper in Yerevan, said a debt burden of a third of
GDP was probably not something to worry about.

"In our credit history there have been years that have been worse
when, as in 1999, the state debt of Armenia exceeded 50 percent of
GDP. However, the current tendency is such that the level of state debt
in the future will inevitably exceed 50 percent of GDP, and possibly,
even 60 percent," he said.

Prime Minister Tigran Sarkisian declined to make any specific
predictions on the level of the debt, but said it was not a problem.

"The credits taken in 2009 can be divided into two… [The first] are
aimed at improving infrastructure and all their weight will fall on
the state budget. The second part the state has offered or will offer
as credit to entrepreneurs. In this case, the weight of repaying the
credit will fall on the businesses, despite the fact that they are
part of the state’s external debt."

The criticism faced by the prime minister, however, is not only
connected to the volume of the debt, but also for its usage. Many
economists, including Avagyan, say the money has been spent unwisely.

Avagyan said the money has been channeled as credit via banks,
as direct credits to large companies or as social payments to the
unemployed and pensioners. However, he said many small businesses had
been unable to access this money from any of Armenia’s 20 commercial
banks.

His opinion is widely held among economists, and even among government
supporters, such as Vardan Bostanjyan, a parliamentary deputy from
Prosperous Armenia, which is part of the government coalition. "Among
those to blame are the authorities themselves," he said.

But his criticism was not as fierce as that of Bagratyan, who was
particularly unimpressed with the credits given directly by the
government to big companies – such as the $40 million loaned to
Armrosgazprom, the local arm of Russian state gas company Gazprom.

Ara Nranyan, an economist who is also a deputy for the opposition
Dashnaktsutyun, said the government needed to consider new measures
to achieve results.

"Sadly, we have seen no actual steps to constructively change the
situation," he said. "We have said many times that imports must be
substituted with locally-produced goods. What have we done for local
producers or to create jobs? Almost nothing. Those funds sourced from
abroad must be sent to those areas that will help the development of
the real economy and the creation of jobs."

Why The Armenian Genocide Matters

WHY THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE MATTERS

The Huffington Post
hy-the-armenian-genocide_b_496995.html
March 12 2010

You may ask yourself why the Armenian Genocide currently matters,
or more accurately, why Turkey is so resolute against it being
recognized as such. One would think after almost a hundred years,
an official apology for killing or displacing 2 million Armenians
would be a welcome and long overdue occasion for Turkey to make peace
with Armenia. But as we’ve seen, Turkey has threatened "diplomatic
consequences" if Obama doesn’t suppress a congressional resolution
that would officially use the label "genocide" for the incident, even
going so far as to withdraw their U.S. Ambassador because of it. In
fact, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said the issue was a
matter of "honor" for his country and no less than Turkish President
Abdullah Gul said the following:

"I declare such a decision that was taken with political concerns in
mind to be an injustice to history and to the science of history.

Turkey will not be responsible for the negative results that this
event may lead to."

Before we examine this further, it would be helpful to define the
term "genocide" so that we know what we’re talking about. In 1948,
the United Nations adopted the Convention on the Prevention and
Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG). Article 2 of this
convention defines genocide as "any of the following acts committed
with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical,
racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group;
causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated
to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing
measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly
transferring children of the group to another group."

Under these terms, the widespread massacres and deportations of
Armenians in 1915- which included the use of 25 major concentration
camps, forced marches, mass burnings, drownings, and gassings- were
in every way a genocide by the Turks against the Armenians. So why is
Turkey so against calling it as such, let alone apologizing? After all,
Germany has made great steps to publicly acknowledge and profusely
apologize for the Jewish Holocaust, even paying reparations, making
holocaust denial and the display of symbols of Nazism a criminal
offense and establishing a National Holocaust Memorial Museum in
Berlin. But Turkey? They won’t even allow the US to label the Armenian
Genocide as such or acknowledge it in any way. Here is why: land.

Take a look at a map of pre-Genocide Armenia here, here and here. What
you will notice is that a huge chunk of what is now Turkey was
then considered Armenia. If the 1915 Turkish actions were indeed
recognized as a genocide, current day Armenia could potentially
petition for the return of its land. Note that this may even include
the area known as Cilicia, a separate but ethnically connected entity
bordering the Mediterranean Sea that dates back to the Kingdom of
Cilician Armenia in the early part of the second Millenium. These
historically grounded lands could rightfully be considered Armenian if
they could establish that they were unlawfully taken from them via the
Genocide. The evidence is there and so is the history. Armenia itself
was officially named way back in 512 BC when it was annexed to Persia,
while Cilicia was established as a principality it 1078. After years
of struggle under Turkish, Kurdish and Mongol rule, the Ottoman Empire
ruled Armenia from 1453-1829, after which the Russian Empire ruled
through the rest of the 19th century. After the Genocide and WWI,
what’s left of Armenia was annexed by Bolshevist Russia and became
part of the Soviet Union from 1922-1991, after which Armenia declared
its independence. But let’s back up for a moment for a glimpse at
what happened during WWI.

In 1913, three so-called Young Turks took over the Turkish government
via a coup with a goal of uniting all of the Turkic peoples in
the region and creating a new Turkish empire called Turan with one
language and one religion. The wanted to expand their borders eastward
but standing in their way was historic Armenia. Hence, the Armenian
Genocide. In December of 1920, the Treaty of Alexandropol was signed
between the Democratic Republic of Armenia and the Grand National
Assembly of Turkey, thereby ending the Turkish-Armenian War while
forcing Armenia to cede over 50% of it’s land to Turkey. In seven
years, the Turkish government had ethnically cleansed and took over
most of Armenia. Armenia was granted formal international recognition
with the 1920 signing of the Treaty of Sevres and with the help of
President Woodrow Wilson, arranged for the return of a portion of
their historic homeland. However, Turkey soon elected Mustafa Kemal,
an extreme nationalist who refused to honor the treaty and set about
re-occupying those lands, leaving current day Armenia as a far smaller
portion of its former self.

Interestingly (and not all unexpected) Turkey is predominantly Muslim
and Armenia is predominantly Christian, dating back to AD 40 when
the Armenian Church was purportedly founded by two of Jesus’ disciples.

Currently, over 93% of Armenian Christians belong to the Armenian
Apostolic Church and they rightly claim that the Armenian Genocide
was a religious and ethnic cleansing. It was also a purging of a
culture that was in many ways more advanced and educated than their
Turkish neighbors. Here’s a passage from the Armenian Genocide page
on historyplace.com that’s illuminating:

There were also big cultural differences between Armenians and Turks.

The Armenians had always been one of the best educated communities
within the old Turkish empire. Armenians were the professionals in
society, the businessmen, lawyers, doctors and skilled craftsmen. And
they were more open to new scientific, political and social ideas
from the West (Europe and America). Children of wealthy Armenians
went to Paris, Geneva or even to America to complete their education.

By contrast, the majority of Turks were illiterate peasant farmers and
small shop keepers. Leaders of the Ottoman Empire had traditionally
placed little value on education and not a single institute of higher
learning could be found within their old empire. The various autocratic
and despotic rulers throughout the empire’s history had valued loyalty
and blind obedience above all. Their uneducated subjects had never
heard of democracy or liberalism and thus had no inclination toward
political reform. But this was not the case with the better educated
Armenians who sought political and social reforms that would improve
life for themselves and Turkey’s other minorities.

The Young Turks decided to glorify the virtues of simple Turkish
peasantry at the expense of the Armenians in order to capture peasant
loyalty. They exploited the religious, cultural, economic and political
differences between Turks and Armenians so that the average Turk came
to regard Armenians as strangers among them.

Even before the Young Turks took over, there was a spike in Islamic
fundamentalism and Christian Armenians were branded as infidels. In
1909, tens of thousands of Armenians from hundreds of villages in
Cilicia were massacred, setting the stage for the Genocide years
later. Reading an account of these atrocities is not for the faint
of heart and yet, we must not shield our eyes from the dark realities
of history, lest we want to see them repeated. As much as we wish to
see these barbaric behaviors relegated to the distant past, one need
only look to places like Darfur, Bosnia and Rwanda to see modern day
humans at their worst.

The histories of Armenia and Turkey are surely intertwined and yet,
this Genocide remains a black stain on both their psyches. Judging
from Turkeys recalcitrance to discuss or acknowledge it, that stain
may never go away. But that doesn’t mean it will ever be forgotten,
no matter how much Turkey wishes it would fade into history. Though
they would like to take advantage of the worlds collective amnesia,
the internet has made it impossible to forget and erase this so-called
"injustice to history". Here is a telling quote from Adolph Hitler,
speaking to his generals before invading Poland in 1939:

"Thus for the time being I have sent to the East only my ‘Death’s
Head Units’ with the orders to kill without pity or mercy all men,
women, and children of Polish race or language. Only in such a way
will we win the vital space that we need. Who still talks nowadays
about the Armenians?"

We all do, Mr. Hitler, and long after your genocidal dreams have
faded, long after the last survivors of those inflicted generations
have passed, they will not be forgotten. Armenian-American author
William Saroyan put it best:

"I should like to see any power of the world destroy this race, this
small tribe of unimportant people, whose history is ended, whose wars
have all been fought and lost, whose structures have crumbled, whose
literature is unread, whose music is unheard, whose prayers are no
longer uttered. Go ahead, destroy this race. Let us say that it is
again 1915. There is war in the world. Destroy Armenia. See if you
can do it. Send them from their homes into the desert. Let them have
neither bread nor water. Burn their houses and their churches. See
if they will not live again. See if they will not laugh again. See if
the race will not live again when two of them meet in a beer parlor,
twenty years after, and laugh, and speak in their tongue. Go ahead,
see if you can do anything about it. See if you can stop them from
mocking the big ideas of the world, you sons of bitches, a couple of
Armenians talking in the world, go ahead and try to destroy them."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robbie-gennet/w

AGBU Europe Welcomes Sweden’s vote on Armenian Genocide

PRESS RELEASE
AGBU Europe
Press contact: Anush Nazaryan
Tel : + 32 2 762 67 97.
Mobile: + 32 4 87 60 55 82
Email: [1][email protected]
Web: [2], [3]

AGBU EUROPE WELCOMES RECOGNITION OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE BY THE
PARLIAMENT OF SWEDEN

Brussels, March 12, 2010 – AGBU Europe congratulates the Parliament of
Sweden for acknowledging the genocides committed against the
Armenians, Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and Pontic Greeks during the
First World War.

The Parliament of Sweden adopted the resolution by a vote of 131 to
130 on Thursday 11 March. In response, Turkey withdrew its Ambassador
and cancelled Prime Minister Erdogan’s scheduled visit.

“Sweden often strives to reconcile effectiveness and ethics in its
relations with the world. We applaud it for its principled and
constructive stance on the Genocide. The truth will set us all free.”
said Nicolas Tavitian, of AGBU Europe.

This vote comes on the heels of another vote, last Thursday (March 4),
in the U.S. Senate Foreign Affairs Committee, which also acknowledged
the Armenian Genocide. The resolution passed in spite of heavy
pressure from Turkey; the Turkish government recalled their ambassador
to the United States.

Opponents to the resolution in the US most often justified their
stance on the basis of Turkey’s strategic importance to the United
States. They also argue that Turkey may now refuse to open its border
with Armenia.

AGBU Europe believes it is a mistake on the part of European countries
or of the U.S. to yield to the demands of a fellow NATO member, EU
candidate country and self-declared friend to conceal the
truth. Turkish society is in the process of discovering the truth
about their country’s past. We are doing them no favour if we oblige
in their historic taboos precisely when their own society is
challenging them.

Turkey signed two protocols with Armenia on October 10, 2009 that were
intended to lead to the normalization of relations between the two
countries after a 17-year blockade (1993-2010) of Armenia by
Turkey. The country then reneged on its commitment and subjected
ratification of the agreement to further conditions. The process is
widely considered blocked in the Turkish Grand National Assembly. The
recognition of the Genocide in Sweden and the United States is a
useful signal to Turkey that it needs to radically rethink its policy
towards the Republic of Armenia and towards Armenians generally and to
urgently complete the normalization process.

AGBU Europe coordinates and develops the Pan-European activities of
the Armenian General Benevolent Union (AGBU) including the promotion
of important initiatives in areas as diverse as academic research,
conservation and promotion of heritage, culture, education and
Armenian language teaching and European policies, training of
association leaders and children and youth activities. Established in
1906, AGBU ( [4] ) is the world’s largest non-profit
Armenian organization and is headquartered in New York City.

131, rue Stassart, 1050, Brussels, Belgium. T: + 32 27 62 67 97,
F: + 32 25 02 62 30, E: [email protected], W: agbueurope.org

References

1. mailto:[email protected]
2.
3.
4.

This message was sent by: Anush Nazaryan, 131, Stassart street,
Brussels, Brussels 1050, Belgium

http://www.agbu.org/
http://www.agbueurope.org/
http://www.agbu.org/
www.agbu.org
www.agbueurope.org
www.agbu.org

ANKARA: Turkish PM Erdogan: "We Might Not Return Our Ambassador to W

TURKISH PM ERDOGAN: "WE MIGHT NOT RETURN OUR AMBASSADOR TO WASHINGTON"
By Diyar Guldogan

Journal of Turkish Weekly
March 10 2010

Since the U.S. House Committee on Foreign Affairs passed the
so-called Armenian "genocide" bill, Turkish Prime Minister Recep
Tayyip Erdogan stated that Turkey would not return its Ambassador to
the United States, Namik Tan, until it obtained a clear position from
the U.S. administration.

On March 4, the Committee passed the bill on Armenian allegations
regarding the incidents of 1915 in a vote of 23-22. After passing
this resolution, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said that
it might be some time before Namik Tan returns to Washington. Prime
Minister Erdogan also implied that Namik Tan would stay in Ankara
for a while unless certain steps are taken.

After receiving the "King Faisal International Prize for Service
to Islam" at a ceremony held in Riyadh on Wednesday, Erdogan made
statements to journalists on various topics. He said that the
Committee’s approval of the draft is quite upsetting to Turkey and
that the Committee’s attitude while adopting the draft was improper.

Erdogan believes that the U.S. will not sacrifice its strategic
partnership with Turkey for the sake of simple political calculations.

He said that the attitude of the U.S. in the next period would be quite
important for Turkey. Erdogan said, "We will assess the situation
with a long-term perspective. We will not send our ambassador back
if we do not see the consequences clearly."

Armenian Junior Fencer Armenak Gasparyan Wins Bronze In Fencing Worl

ARMENIAN JUNIOR FENCER ARMENAK GASPARYAN WINS BRONZE IN FENCING WORLD CUP

PanARMENIAN.Net
09.03.2010 15:09 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian fencer Armenak Gasparyan (foil) won Bronze
at World Youth Cup held in the Iranian city of Yazd. According to
General Secretary of Armenian Fencing Federation Artashes Madoyan, on
April 26 and 27, ‘our athletes will take part at the European Fencing
Championship under 23 years to be held in the Polish city of Gdansk.

Some Call It Destiny, While Others, Luck

SOME CALL IT DESTINY, WHILE OTHERS, LUCK
By Heghinar Melkom Melkomian

it-destiny-while-others-luck/
Mar 8th, 2010

Lousadzin was looking out of the window when she noticed that one of
their neighbors was trying to steal water from their well. While she
leaned over the window and began shouting at him, she fell out of the
window, face down. She received a deep cut on her jaw. There was one
doctor in their village: her father, Artin and one nursing assistant,
her mother, Mariam. Artin stitched the wound, which was later replaced
by a bumpy scar on Lousadzin’s fragile face.

Back then who could have guessed one day a specific type of doctor
– the plastic surgeon – would earn hundreds of thousand of dollars
annually for making cuts which can be stitched back without leaving
any traces? Who could have guessed that her fall was destined from
above? Who could have guessed that that very scar, which would decorate
her face for the rest of her life, would be her ticket to her past,
the ticket to the only member of her family left? Who could have
guessed what would happen in 1915? Could you guess that this story
isn’t just about Lousadzin; this story is as much about him – he was
called Srabion…

Srabion was born in 1905 and was 5 years older than Lousadzin. They
lived in Kilis, in Western Armenia, where the "native" language was
Turkish. He was the son of respected Artin and Mariam and the brother
of Lousadzin, Ohannes, Ghevond and Haik. The Der Haroutounian family
was not an ordinary family because they lived in Kilis, in Western
Armenia in the beginning of the 20th century, because one day the wheel
of their lives would take an unprecedented turn and their family tree
would break irreversibly, because one day the home that belonged to
them would be snatched from their hands, literally over their dead
bodies by the Young Turks.

During 1914-1915 the Der Haroutounian family was deported and brought
to Aleppo by the Young Turks. Here they stayed with their cousins,
after which they rented their own place. The Aleppo authorities had
passed a decree according to which the local Armenian community in
Aleppo had papers which exempted them from being deported. Since
the Der Haroutounian family did not have the corresponding papers,
during the day they stayed with their cousins and only returned to
their rented accommodation at night, in order to avoid getting caught
by the authorities.

One day Srabion was feeling sick and he was left at their cousin’s
home to recover, while the rest of the family members went home,
where Lousadzin and her grandmother awaited them. They were caught
by the Turkish Police in front of the house. Artin said that his
daughter and mother-in-law were waiting for them in the house,
but his words were ignored. Since he lacked the necessary papers,
together with thousands of other Armenians, the Der Haroutounians
were put on a train and deported from Aleppo. From this moment the
life of one family was divided into three: Srabion on the one hand,
Lousadzin and her grandmother on the second and Artin, Mariam, Ohannes,
Ghevond and Haik on the third.

Lousadzin and her grandmother were taken out of the house and taken
to the Jdeidieh Police Station. The train carrying the remaining Der
Haroutounians dropped them off in lands belonging to the Cherkez.

After returning to the rented house the next day, Srabion found the
house abandoned and was told by the neighbors that his family was
taken in an unknown direction while his sister and grandmother were
taken to Jdeidieh. Srabion decided to go to Jdeidieh.

After reaching the Police station Srabion saw his grandmother and
sister from the window. He tried to help them escape but the police
noticed him and fortunately sent him away. Srabion returned to his
cousin’s place to tell them what had happened and he decided to
return that night to help them to escape. But how would a ten year
old boy know that upon his return they would no longer be there? His
grandmother and Lousadzin, together with other Armenians caught by the
Turks were sent on the march to Der el Zor. For three days Lousadzin’s
75 year old grandmother tried to beg for a piece of bread and on
the night of the fourth day her old body gave up and in the morning
Lousadzin found her grandmother dead in the middle of the desert. With
no one to turn to, with thousands of other Armenians battling between
life and death, her cries were ignored. She stayed behind, crying
over the body of her dead grandmother, her only relative left.

Srabion – Not knowing what to do, Srabion decided to return to Kilis,
to their family home. His uncle, who had managed to escape and return
to his home, took Srabion in. You would think he was a lucky boy
to find family, but his uncle forced him to work in a factory, his
earnings – one "barghut" (money) and one libra of flour – were taken
by his uncle, who almost did not even feed him. He was nothing more,
and nothing less, than an undernourished slave.

Lousadzin – While crying alone in the desert an Arab woman heard
Lousadzin’s voice. She took pity on her and decided to keep her,
giving her the Arabic name Khatun and decorating her upper lip and
her nose with symbolic tribal tattoos. You would think she was a
lucky child to be saved instead of dying from hunger in the desert,
but Lousadzin later found out that she had been taken by a beggar
who beat her to steal food from a rich Agha’s gardens and to beg.

The other Der Haroutunians – Several months after landing in Cherkez
lands, the order to slaughter all Armenians came overnight, and that
is where the story of Artin, Mariam, Ohannes, Ghevond and Haik ends.

Srabion and Lousadzin were left orphans at the age of 10 and 5
respectively, without being aware of each other’s existence.

One day a very hungry Srabion asked a woman at work to make her
something with his flour to satisfy his hunger. After bringing home
the remaining flour his uncle noticed that the bag was lighter and
kicked Srabion out of the house; he headed towards Aleppo. To cut a
long story short, years passed while Srabion lived in different places,
worked as a servant boy for Arabs and one day, once again decided to
return to Kilis. Before his return, as a result of a meeting in the
Kilis church, it was decided to gather all Armenian orphans and send
them to an orphanage. Srabion returned to Kilis and together with the
other orphans was sent to the Armenian orphanage in Beirut. There he
studied for three years and on the last year of his study he wrote
an excellent essay entitled "Struggle" and won a patronage from an
American benefactor and a pen. Upon graduation he once again returned
to Aleppo in an effort to find his family and relatives.

In Aleppo, Srabion found one of his relatives and started living
there. After a year he applied and got accepted in the "Frere Maurisse"
boarding school in Jounie, in Lebanon, the expenses of which was paid
by the same above-mentioned American patron. He graduated and received
his baccalaureate. He once again returned to Aleppo and began teaching
French and worked at various companies. He then decided to go live
in the Motherland, which was Soviet at that time. He went to Iran and
from there he tried to enter the motherland. His first attempt failed
and while living in Iran and awaiting the right opportunity to move
out, he found friends with whom he shared a room. One day one of his
roommates passed away and during his funeral Srabion read the Eulogy,
during which he praised the motherland; he was deported from Iran
by the infamous Iranian Savak in 24 hours and he once again returned
to Aleppo.

He began teaching in an Armenian school for poor Armenian children and
was later called to work as the headmaster of the Der el Zor School.

During all this time Khatun grew up in the village of Debsi al faraj,
where many other "adopted" Armenian orphans eventually ended up and
they were all continually reminded that they were Armenians. There the
Agha of the village, a compassionate and educated man, married Khatun
to another Armenian orphan from Urfa – Bedros Boyajian, who had been
brought to the village at the age of 10 and worked as a shepherd in
the Agha’s household and had been renamed Ahmad El Abed. Khatun and
Ahmad El Abed had four children: three daughters and a son.

One day Srabion went to Aleppo on a visit. He had the habit of playing
backgammon with several of his friends in a cafe. One of his friends
was also an Armenian from Kilis who worked as a driver. During their
game the driver relates to Srabion that about a year ago, about 120 km
from Aleppo he had noticed an Arab carrying water. He had asked for
some water and judging from the man’s features he had guessed he was
Armenian. It so turned out that the man was indeed an Armenian from
Urfa and his wife was an Armenian woman from Kilis. Srabion’s world
collapsed and he began wondering if his sister was alive amongst the
Arabs. Was it possible that his small and fragile sister had survived
the Genocide? He decided to go and find out.

To date, the Arabs are well known for their friendliness and their
warm hospitality. In Debsi al faraj, Srabion was welcomed by the Agha,
who invited him to his house. After Srabion told his story and his
suspicion that the woman living in the village might be his sister,
the Agha ordered 5-6 women with their children, including Khatun,
to be brought in and lined them up in front of Srabion. Srabion had
not seen his sister in more than 25 years and all the women looked
the same: tattoos covered their faces and the hardships of living and
working in a village had left their faces burned and skin dried from
the merciless Syrian sun.

In this life sometimes some things happen with a certain purpose. Some
people call that destiny. When it comes to this story and many other
true stories of Genocide survivors, I believe in destiny and so will
you. I wonder if at that moment my grandfather’s life flashed before
his eyes – his years as an orphan in boarding schools, his job at the
factory, as a servant boy, his failure to move to the motherland,
his searches for his family, Kilis, his village, his father Artin,
his mother Mariam, his grandmother, Ohannes, Ghevon, Haik and little
Lousadzin and suddenly everything made sense to him and he realized
that his journey might have been harsh, but had been destined from
above.

In Srabion’s and Lousadzin’s lives many things had been destined from
above, just like that day when Lousadzin tried to stop the neighbor
from stealing their water and fell from the window, as a result
of which she was left to live with a scar on her jaw. Srabion saw
Lousadzin’s scar and fainted, for, besides her resemblance to him,
there was also that proof. Later Srabion asked permission from the
Agha of the village to take his sister and her family with him and his
wish was granted, for the Agha told the rest of the Arab villagers
that Khatun had lived amongst them for many years and the time had
come for her and her family to live amongst their own kind.

During the 1915 genocide it is said that 1.5 million Armenians were
killed. I personally think this number is an understatement. I wonder
what happened to the rest of the Armenian orphans on whom destiny
did not smile and who were never found by their brothers or sisters
or parents or grandparents. I have personally met many Armenians in
Syria who know that their grandparents or great grandparents were
Armenians and survived the Armenian Genocide but since they were never
reunited with their families they were raised as Arabs and the same
can be said about many in Turkey. I wonder if we were to count the
number of these Armenians and add it to the 1.5 million, how many more
million Armenians were "killed" as a result of the Armenian Genocide,
because once we lose our language, our traditions and our links to
our ancestors, we lose our Armenianness.

http://www.asbarez.com/78056/some-call-

BAKU: YAP sends letter to speaker of US house of representatives

State Telegraph Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan
March 5, 2010 Friday

YAP SENDS LETTER TO SPEAKER OF US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Baku March 5

The New Azerbaijan Party has sent a letter speaker of the United
States House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi. The letter, in
particular, says: Dear Mrs. Pelosi,

The New Azerbaijan Party very much regrets and strongly condemns the
resolution on the so-called Armenian genocide passed by the US House
Committee on Foreign Affairs on March 4 this year.

No doubt, adoption of the decision on the fictitious Armenian
genocide, which is not based on established facts, contradicts the
principles of truth and justice.

The fact that some members of the US House of Representatives voted
for this document under the evident pressure of the Armenian lobby
does not only arouse regret but also heavily damage US-Turkey and
US-Azerbaijan relations.

The attempt of the US Congress to adopt such a decision throws shadow
on the country`s mediation efforts since the US, co-chair country,
undertook a mission to settle the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict over
Nagorno-Karabakh. On the other hand, US shows disrespect to its
commitment to friendship and partnership. At the same time, it
suggests the country does not want to take objective and impartial
approach to historical events. The Khojaly genocide, which occurred
not so long ago, on February 26, 1992 in the region of Karabakh,
showed to the world in fact who is able to commit crimes against
humanity. Nevertheless, the US House of Representatives, for some
reason, has been indifferent to date to this bloody crime, thus,
patronizing the aggressor directly.

We consider that the decision of the US House Foreign Affairs
Committee will have a negative impact on the regional developments as
a whole and be regarded as a moral and political support to Armenia
the country, which does not recognize territorial integrity of
neighboring countries and pursued the policy of ethnic purge in its
actions threatening peace and stability in the region of Caucasus.

Expressing sentiments and reaction of the people of Azerbaijan, the
New Azerbaijan Party once again strongly condemns the resolution of
the US House Foreign Affairs Committee, evaluates it as a biased,
partial and unfair step in essence, and hopes that common sense will
prevail in the US Congress, and adoption of the fictitious Armenian
genocide by the Congress will be prevented.