Defense minister: Structural changes in Armenia army leadership are necessary

NEWS.am
Armenia – July 6 2022

Structural changes in the leadership of the Armed Forces of Armenia are a necessity. Minister of Defense Suren Papikyan stated this at Wednesday’s special meeting of the National Assembly Standing Committee on Defense and Security.

According to him, the respective matter is particularly about endowing the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces with the functions of the First Deputy Minister of Defense.

The defense minister noted that during the last years, two institutions were basically formed within one defense department, which, in his opinion, has violated the effective operation of the defense system in Armenia and created additional bureaucratic problems.

However, in the event of a war, the main political accountability, according to the minister of defense, falls on the shoulders of the defense minister of Armenia.

"And every official must have willpower to fulfill his powers. From this point of view, the changes assumed by the government decide as clearly as possible the scope of accountability of each official," said Papikyan.

By and large, the defense minister believes that the proposed changes will make the defense ministry of Armenia more monolithic.

Also, he noted that within the defense structures of Armenia one can often come across divisions whose functions are repeated. According to the Minister of Defense, this is simply unacceptable.

Karabakh FM holds phone talk with Transnistria counterpart

NEWS.am
Armenia – July 5 2022

STEPNAKERT. – Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh) Minister of Foreign Affairs David Babayan on Tuesday had a telephone conversation with Foreign Minister Vitaly Ignatev of the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic (Transnistria).

Babayan congratulated his counterpart on his birthday, wishing him productive work and success, the Artsakh Ministry of Foreign Affairs informed Armenian News-NEWS.am.

The parties discussed the regional situation and possible developments. They stressed the need to maintain and expand the cooperation between Artsakh and Transnistria, as well as their foreign ministries.

Armenian Ombudsperson sees great potential for democratic governance in parliamentary system

Save

Share

 13:35, 4 July 2022

YEREVAN, JULY 4, ARMENPRESS. It is necessary to develop the parliamentary system of government as it has a great potential for democratic governance, Human Rights Defender of Armenia Kristinne Grigoryan said at a discussion on the topic of the necessity of constitutional amendments.

“We have a path to pass for the further development of the parliamentary model”, she said.

She said that the amendment of the Constitution is a goal deriving from the government’s action plan, for which there are concrete deadlines.

“I think we should not follow the calendar. For us it’s important that this process is perceivable for the people, that the Constitution really becomes that of a human, not as an incomprehensible document”, she said. “The term of office of Human Rights Defender should be clearly enshrined by the Constitution that a person could be elected to that post only once. This is directly aimed at further strengthening the independence of this institution”, she added.

Political scientist: If Armenian authorities had goal to keep Berdzor they would have found way to keep it

NEWS.am
Armenia – July 2 2022

After the formation of the new parliament in 2021, National Assembly (NA) MP Tigran Abrahamyan twice sent a question to the government regarding six settlements of Kashatagh region of Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh)—including Berdzor town and Aghavno village —which means that the topic was raised. He was told that everything would be discussed with the public; nothing would be done in secret. Former MP, political scientist Tevan Poghosyan stated about this in an interview with Armenian News-NEWS.am.

"[But] now it turns out that these issues were discussed, they have done some things. Did they inform the public? Unfortunately, it turns out [that] the policy is the same, they keep everything secret, then say ‘We will be held accountable.’ And maybe you should be held accountable for not being able to show a creative approach as to what you should have done to use the issues of interpreting the text of the November 9 [2020 trilateral] statement in the right way because an ‘alternative road’ is written, it is not written [that] an alternative Lachin corridor will be opened, which means that the Lachine corridor should remain as it is; several corners, maybe bridges, tunnels can be built inside it. That is, if you set a goal for Berdzor [(Lachin)] to remain, then I'm sure they would have found a way to keep it," said Poghosyan, again expressing his conviction that it was possible to keep Berdzor under Armenian control.

"I'm not even saying that there should have been a project within three years. Three years have passed, but we see that they are building a road from the side, and they are trying to ‘sell’ us that the quality is better. I have spoken with specialists; they say that in the case of this new road, the main heights will remain with Azerbaijan in terms of control of that road. What is safe about it? There was no intention to keep Berdzor, the goal was to hand [it] over; for that, everything was done this way. Now, whether they had agreed or did it out of fear, what difference does it make to us at this point? Only new defeats should be expected from the defeated [Armenian] authorities," he emphasized.

Tevan Poghosyan is convinced that there will be no peace, as it has not happened in the last thousand years.

"The peace agreement is a piece of paper. Syria and Turkey have also signed agreements, as have Russia and Ukraine. Be more afraid of that ‘era of peace;’ and the example is Nakhichevan, which was completely de-Armenianized in 50 years."

He emphasized that a statesman who is concerned about the interests of Armenia should have realized that he should step down in order not to allow others to advance their interests as they wish—because they do it through him.

"The best example of that was given by [First President] Levon Ter-Petrosyan in 1998. That person opened the door so that we could advance our interests in the international arena for 20 years."

And when asked about the probability of a new war at this moment, Tevan Poghosyan responded: "It can start at any moment. The law, "If you want peace, prepare for war" is a law of nature. Now we [i.e., Armenians] have decided to go against the laws of nature and wonder if it will work. It won't work!"

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 06/30/2022

                                        Thursday, 


Karabakh Leader Seeks To Allay Fears Over New Corridor To Armenia

        • Gayane Saribekian
        • Naira Nalbandian

Nagorno-Karabakh - A view of the village of Aghano and a road leading to 
Armenia, April 16, 2022.


Nagorno-Karabakh’s leader insisted on Thursday that a new highway that will 
replace the existing corridor connecting the territory with Armenia will be 
safer and more reliable for its population.

The five-kilometer-wide Lachin corridor became Karabakh’s sole overland link to 
Armenia following the 2020 war with Azerbaijan. Armenian forces pulled out of 
the rest of the wider Lachin district under the terms of the Russian-brokered 
ceasefire that stopped the six-week hostilities.

The truce accord calls for the construction by 2024 of a new Armenia-Karabakh 
highway that will bypass the town of Lachin and two Armenian-populated villages 
located within the corridor protected by Russian peacekeeping troops.

Azerbaijani and Turkish construction firms have been rapidly building the 
32-kilomer-long highway that will link up to new road sections in Armenia and 
Karabakh. Work on those sections has still not begun.

The construction of a new road that will connect Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenia.

Arayik Harutiunian, the Karabakh president, sought to allay concerns about the 
loss of the existing Lachin corridor and its security implications when he spoke 
in the local parliament. He stressed that the route of the bypass road currently 
built by Azerbaijan was approved by Karabakh’s leadership.

“We chose what we believe is the best variant,” Harutiunian told lawmakers in 
Stepanakert. “It will be much safer and will address many security issues. We 
can explain why it will be much safer, but without making that public here.”

Harutiunian confirmed that the Armenian side will have to evacuate the few 
remaining Armenian residents of the town of Lachin and one of the two nearby 
villages, Sus. He said it still hopes to retain control over the other village, 
Aghavno.

“The [ceasefire] document says that we must pull out of the town of Berdzor 
(Lachin),” he said. “But with regard to Aghavno, we still have things to do. We 
are continuing to hold negotiations in that direction.”

Nagorno-Karabakh - Houses in the village of Aghano, April 16, 2022.
“We will continue to fight for Aghavno,” stressed the Karabakh leader.

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian indicated on Monday, however, that Aghavno will 
also be given back to Baku. He said the residents of this and the other Lachin 
settlements will be provided with new housing in Armenia and Karabakh.

Pashinian’s remarks angered many of Aghavno’s 200 or so residents. Speaking to 
RFE/RL’s Armenian Service earlier this week, they said they have no intention to 
leave their homes.

“God forbid that such a thing happens,” one of them said. “I don’t know how the 
people will react. No other place can replace Aghavno, not even the center of 
Yerevan.”

“If Armenia is abandoning us … then Artsakh (Karabakh) will take care of us and 
we will stay here,” said another villager.



Armenia’s Judicial Watchdog Refuses To Censure Embattled Head


Armenia - Gagik Jahangirian chairs a session of the Supreme Judicial Council, 
Yerevan, July 26, 2021.


A state body overseeing Armenia’s courts has officially refused to take 
disciplinary action against its acting head, Gagik Jahangirian, over leaked 
audio in which he appeared to blackmail his predecessor at loggerheads with the 
government.

Ruben Vartazarian, the former chairman of the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC), 
publicized on June 20 a 14-minute audio clip which he secretly recorded during a 
dinner meeting with Jahangirian in February 2021. The meeting took place two 
months before Vartazarian was controversially suspended by other SJC members 
amid rising tensions with Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian.

In the recording full of profanities uttered by him, Jahangirian can be heard 
seemingly warning Vartazarian to step down or face criminal charges.

Jahangirian claimed late last week that he simply tried to trick Vartazarian 
into resigning as head of the state body that nominates judges and can also fire 
them. He dismissed calls for his resignation and prosecution voiced by 
opposition and civil society groups.

Immediately after the outbreak of the scandal, the SJC indicated that it will 
not even consider launching disciplinary proceedings against Jahangirian. But 
one of its members, Davit Khachaturian, said on Monday that the judicial 
watchdog has set up a working group that will look into the audio clip and 
determine whether it warrants such proceedings.

SJC spokeswoman Lilit Shaboyan said on Thursday that the group consisting of 
five SJC members has concluded that the “edited recording” is not sufficient 
grounds for punishing Jahangirian. She said the watchdog cannot take any 
disciplinary action also because of a statute of limitations.

The SJC launched disciplinary proceedings against Vartazarian before ousting him 
as its chairman and member on June 23. The official reason for the move was a 
recent newspaper interview in which he claimed that Jahangirian joined the 
judicial body in January 2021 in breach of Armenian law.

Jahangirian was appointed by the Armenian parliament controlled by Pashinian’s 
party. Ever since Jahangirian took over the SJC in April 2021, Armenian courts 
have rarely rejected arrest warrants sought by law-enforcement authorities for 
opposition figures prosecuted on various charges rejected by them as politically 
motivated.

Independent and pro-opposition media outlets have regularly accused Jahangirian 
of pressuring judges to make such decisions. He denies that.

Pashinian admitted on Monday that a scandal sparked by the leaked audio has 
undermined the credibility of judicial reforms declared by his administration. 
But he did not say whether he believes Jahangirian should resign.

Pashinian’s political opponents have said all along that the stated reforms are 
a smokescreen for increasing government influence on courts.



Families Of Fallen Soldiers Continue Protests

        • Naira Bulghadarian

Armenia - The parents of soldiers killed in the 2020 Karabakh war protest 
outsidethe Supreme Judicial Council, Yerevan, May 26, 2022.


Dozens of parents of Armenian soldiers killed in the 2020 war in 
Nagorno-Karabakh again rallied outside prosecutors’ headquarters in Yerevan on 
Thursday to demand criminal charges against Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian.

Their protests were sparked by Pashinian’s remarks made on April 13 in response 
to continuing opposition criticism of his handling of the devastating war that 
left at least 3,825 Armenian soldiers dead.

“They say now, ‘Could they have averted the war?’” Pashinian told the 
parliament. “They could have averted the war, as a result of which we would have 
had the same situation, but of course without the casualties.”

The protesting families of several dozen fallen soldiers say Pashinian thus 
publicly admitted deliberately sacrificing thousands of lives. They submitted a 
relevant “crime report” to Armenia’s Office of the Prosecutor-General on April 
18.

The office instructed other law-enforcement agencies to question Pashinian and 
decide whether to launch criminal proceedings against the prime minister. The 
latter has still not been summoned by them for questioning.

The protesting relatives reportedly held a tense meeting with Argisthi 
Kyaramian, the head of the Investigative Committee, last month. They accused him 
of disrespecting and insulting them, a claim denied by the committee.

Representatives of the relatives demanded that Prosecutor-General Artur Davtian 
assign the case to the National Security Service when he received them during 
Thursday’s demonstration. They gave Davtian until Saturday to respond to their 
demand.

“We don’t see any progress [in the promised inquiry,]” one of the protesters 
told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service. “Let them summon [Pashinian] so he answers why 
he made that statement.”

“They killed five thousand guys,” charged another man. “It’s treason.”

Armenian opposition groups hold Pashinian responsible for Armenia’s defeat in 
the war with Azerbaijan. For his part, Pashinian has put the blame on former 
Presidents Robert Kocharian and Serzh Sarkisian, who now lead two of those 
groups.

Kocharian ruled Armenia from 1998-2008, while Sarkisian, his successor, lost 
power more than two years before the outbreak of the hostilities.



Canada To Open Embassy In Armenia


CANADA - People are silhouetted in front of the Canadian national flag at the 
Palais des Congres in Montreal, October 21, 2019.


Canada announced late on Wednesday that it will open an embassy in Armenia to 
deepen bilateral ties in view of the ongoing “profound geopolitical shift” in 
the world.

It said it will also enhance its diplomatic presence in four Eastern European 
countries to “help counter Russia’s destabilizing activities” in the region.

“This diplomatic expansion will help guide Canada’s response to evolving 
security threats, enhance political and economic cooperation to support European 
Allies, and further counter the impacts of the Russian invasion of Ukraine and 
support Armenia in its democratic development,” read a statement released by the 
Canadian government.

It quoted Canadian Foreign Minister Melanie Joly as saying that this will give 
Ottawa “the tools we need to reinforce Armenian democracy and address some of 
the greatest security and diplomatic challenges of our time.”

The statement was timed to coincide with a NATO summit in Madrid that focused on 
continued Western military support for Ukraine. It said Canada’s current 
geopolitical priorities include “pushing back on Russian influence, whether they 
assert it through soft power, disinformation or military force.”

Like other Western powers, NATO member Canada has strongly condemned the Russian 
invasion and provided Ukraine with military and economic assistance. By 
contrast, Armenia has refrained from criticizing the “special military 
operation” launched by Russian President Vladimir Putin on February 24.

The South Caucasus state has long maintained close military, political and 
economic ties with Russia. Its heavy dependence on Moscow for defense and 
security deepened further after the 2020 war in Nagorno-Karabakh.

Sweden - Canadian Foreign Minister Melanie Joly speaks with her Armenian 
counterpart Ararat Mirzoyan during an OSCE ministerial meeting in Stockholm, 
December 2, 2021.

Armenia was quick to welcome Canada’s decision to open an embassy in Yerevan, 
with Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan calling it “another milestone in 
progressively developing Armenian-Canadian relations.”

Joly announced the decision one day after her phone call with Mirzoyan. 
According to the Armenian Foreign Ministry, the two ministers reaffirmed their 
governments’ plans to “further deepen Armenian-Canadian relations.”

The ministry said they also discussed the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and other 
“security challenges” in the South Caucasus.

Joly expressed “Canada’s solidarity with Armenian people” when she spoke with 
Mirzoyan last December on the sidelines of an annual meeting of the top 
diplomats of OSCE member states held in Sweden.

Just days after the outbreak of the Armenian-Azerbaijani war in September 2020, 
the Canadian government suspended the export of drone technology to Turkey. It 
banned such exports altogether in April 2021 after investigating and confirming 
reports that Turkish-manufactured Bayraktar TB2 combat drones, heavily used by 
the Azerbaijani army, are equipped with imaging and targeting systems made by a 
Canada-based firm.


Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2022 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

 

AW: Armenian communities in Lachin to be ceded to Azerbaijan

Sign along the Lachin corridor welcoming travelers to Aghavno (Photo: Flickr/Gert-Jan Peddemors)

The town of Lachin and several nearby villages inhabited by Armenians will be ceded to Azerbaijan following the construction of a new route connecting Armenia and Artsakh, according to Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan. 

Pashinyan confirmed during a three-and-a-half hour online press briefing on June 27 that several villages and towns in the Lachin district “will pass to Azerbaijan’s control.”

The Lachin district was ceded to Azerbaijan after the 2020 Artsakh War, except for the Lachin corridor, which was protected by the November 9 ceasefire agreement as the sole route connecting Armenia and Artsakh. Under the terms of the ceasefire, Armenia and Azerbaijan agreed to construct an alternate route to the Lachin corridor within the following three years, to which Russian peacekeepers would be redeployed. 

The new route will bypass the Armenian communities that currently lie along the Lachin corridor, which will be ceded to Azerbaijan. The communities include the villages Aghavno, Nerkin Sus and Sus, as well as the town of Lachin. 

Pashinyan said that the change in route would “ensure a more reliable and quality connection for Armenia.” Problems arising from the handover of villages “will be solved with the help of the Artsakh government.” 

The new route will start in the Armenian village Kornidzor in Syunik, pass through the villages Hin Shen and Mets Shen in the Shushi district and reach Stepanakert. Construction of the portion of the road passing through Azerbaijani-controlled territory has been underway. The head of Azerbaijan’s state road agency said earlier this year that he expects the route to be ready by July. In contrast, construction on the part of the road that runs through Armenia has not commenced. 

Aghavno came under Armenian control during the first Artsakh War. The village was rebuilt largely through funding from humanitarian organizations in the diaspora. 

After Azerbaijan took control of Lachin in December 2020, the residents of communities like Aghavno were ordered to leave, yet many chose to stay. Of the 270 people who lived in Aghavno before the war, 185 have returned, according to Eurasianet

The mayor of Aghavno Andranik Chavushyan told Eurasianet that living in the village raises “constant obstacles.”

“We never had gas, so we use gas cylinders. We had power outages, so we brought generators. Water shortages? Fortunately, we have a river in the village. We believed in ourselves, not in the government, and refused to leave the village. We are living here today because we relied on ourselves,” Chavushyan said. 

“We are responsible for our future generation. We defended ourselves in the 90s, we did it in 2020, and we are ready to fight again. We only need will and faith in ourselves,” the mayor continued. 

During the question-and-answer session on Monday, Pashinyan also said that Azerbaijan is “trying to build up legitimacy for a new war against Armenia and Artsakh” by creating the impression that Armenia impedes progress on negotiations on border demarcation and a peace treaty. 

Armenian PM Nikol Pashinyan answers questions from the press (RA Prime Minister’s Office, June 27)

“Whether they plan the new war in three months, three years or 30 years is a different issue,” Pashinyan said. 

On the contrary, he said that Azerbaijan obstructs negotiations and hopes to continue the decades-long blockade of Armenia. 

He accused Azerbaijan of canceling a meeting scheduled for Monday in Brussels between Armenian Secretary of the Security Council Armen Grigoryan and foreign policy advisor to Azerbaijan’s president Hikmet Hajiyev. He also accused Azerbaijan of turning down a proposal to organize a face-to-face meeting between the two countries’ foreign ministers.

Nonetheless, Pashinyan was insistent that Armenia must remain committed to a peace agenda.

“There is no alternative to the peace agenda, but it cannot be one-sided. Rather, there must be two-sided, constructive movement. We have done everything and do everything in our power to open an era of peaceful development in our region. The alternative to that is a new war,” Pashinyan said. 

Pashinyan also commented on ongoing negotiations to normalize relations with Turkey, stating that Armenia sees the opportunity to “move forward in small steps” toward this goal. 

“Turkey’s references to the ‘Zangezur corridor’ create a negative tone and are not helpful for the process, but that does not mean that we will halt dialogue,” he said. 

Most local media outlets boycotted the press conference in protest of its online format.

Pashinyan’s last three press conferences since November 2021 have been hosted online, with media outlets given the opportunity to submit questions in advance. The prime minister’s office has defended the ongoing use of the format, citing coronavirus precautions.

A group of 27 editors of primarily pro-opposition or opposition-leaning media outlets released a statement announcing their decision to boycott the press briefing. The outlets, including ARF-owned Yerkir Media, NEWS.am, Panorama.am and Aravot Daily, called on Pashinyan to return to an in-person format.

“The previous experience has proved that such ‘online contacts’ take place in a pre-planned scenario. Only the questions by the pro-government media, Telegram channels and bloggers are publicized during these events, who, apparently, agree in advance with the organizers of the event, and in the case of the questions by other media—they are either ignored, or edited, or distorted,” the statement reads

In a separate statement, eight media outlets, including Civilnet, RFE/RL, the Fact Investigation Platform and Aravot Daily, urged the prime minister to return to an in-person format, since virtually all other coronavirus-related restrictions have been lifted by the administration. 

“During these press conferences, the questions sent by the media are grouped and edited by the prime minister’s office, as a result of which often the content of the question is distorted or nuances of the question are lost. Sometimes some questions are not asked at all,” the statement reads. “Consequently the access of the public to proper information is effectively restricted.”

“We deem this form of interaction with the media by the country’s leader to be discriminatory, ineffective and in contradiction with the core principles of democracy, transparency and accountability,” the statement continues.

Lillian Avedian is a staff writer for the Armenian Weekly. Her writing has also been published in the Los Angeles Review of Books, Hetq and the Daily Californian. She is pursuing master’s degrees in Journalism and Near Eastern Studies at New York University. A human rights journalist and feminist poet, Lillian's first poetry collection Journey to Tatev was released with Girls on Key Press in spring of 2021.


Armenia FM: OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs play key role in Karabakh conflict settlement

NEWS.am
Armenia –

There is a great potential for strengthening economic cooperation between Armenia and Greece, Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan said after his meeting with Greek Foreign Minister Nikos Dendias.

 “Armenian-Greek relations are developing not only within bilateral but also on multilateral important platforms. In this regard, I would like to highlight three important dimensions.

First of all, the cooperation within the framework of the Armenia-Greece-Cyprus trilateral format was at the centre of our discussions. We consider this important initiative an effective tool for establishing stability, security and peace in the region, and are hopeful that through joint efforts it will serve the vital interests of our three countries and peoples. As Minister Dendias noted we have very important and concrete agreements regarding this format.

Of course, today we referred to the issues related to international and regional security and stability.

I presented to my colleague in detail the situation created around the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and the position of Armenia on the processes aimed at establishing regional peace and stability, the negotiations on the normalization of relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

I also touched upon issues related to the processes of the unblocking of the regional economic communications and transport infrastructure, the works within the Commission of delimitation and border security and overall the process on peace agreement.

I stressed the key role of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairmanship in promoting the peace process for the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Armenia appreciates the position of Greece in support of the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict under the mandate and within the framework of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairmanship.

I would also like to seize the opportunity and thank my good friend Nikos, who visited Yerevan during the 44-day war and expressed the sympathy of Greece and the Greek people to us in that crucial period. We will never forget that gesture of a strategic partner.

Unfortunately, more than a year and a half after the ceasefire, Azerbaijan continues its provocative actions against Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh, while the warmongering and expansionist rhetoric has become an integral part of the daily discourse of the leadership of Azerbaijan.

Violating international humanitarian law and the obligations undertaken with the Trilateral Statement of November 9, 2020, Azerbaijan continues to hold the Armenian PoWs and civilians in captivity, while the fate of hundreds of missing persons, including dozens of enforced disappeared, remains unresolved. All the civilized countries of the world, I repeat, all the civilized countries, using all possible opportunities, should contribute, call and insist Azerbaijan to return our prisoners.

Throughout the millennia-long history, the Armenian people have created wonderful churches and monuments that are an integral part of the global cultural heritage. Today, unfortunately, part of this heritage is in danger of imminent destruction. As a result of the state-sponsored, official policy of the Azerbaijani authorities, we have desecrated churches, shattered monuments annihilated of their Armenian trace in the territories fallen under the control of Azerbaijan. Unlike many other such unacceptable cases, we can not say that the world is silent. The world, indeed, talks, and has expressed itself very clearly. One bright example of that is the the decision of the UN Court of Justice to apply provisional measures in 2021, which obliges Azerbaijan to end this policy.

We expect a clear, targeted and continuous response of the international community to this behaviour of Azerbaijan and emphasize the urgency of the involvement of relevant international organizations in Nagorno-Karabakh, especially the implementation of the UNESCO fact-finding mission, which will be a significant step towards preserving this heritage.

And, of course, today I want to emphasize once again that peace is our principle, our policy and strategy. We are really aiming to build a peaceful, secure, stable South Caucasus, we hope that our neighbour will restrain from its expansionist aspirations, and will demonstrate a more constructive position on all issues,” the statement reads.

Turkey’s ban on the Armenian genocide being taught is a slap at history and truth. South Dakotans should take note.

John Tsitrian


As an Armenian on my dad’s side, I’ve listened to some of the most horrible stories you can imagine about the treatment our family and friends got at the hands of the Ottoman Turkish government a century ago.  The Ottomans tried to obliterate anyone having anything to do with Christianity, and that included us Armenians.  

We accepted Christianity as our national religion in 301 A.D. For centuries we lived on the Anatolian Peninsula, home of the modern Turkish state, and co-existed with our neighbors in a generally peaceful way, including during the centuries that the region came under the control of the Ottoman Empire (1453-1922), an Islamic state.

For political and economic reasons too numerous to recount here, the Ottomans started unraveling somewhere around the beginning of the 19th century, and, as a last gasp of trying to contain the many forces of its demise, they started blaming the Christians living within their territory for many of the empire’s troubles, all of it culminating in a mass slaughter that took place during the first couple of decades of the twentieth century.

It wasn’t just Armenians who took the subsequent genocidal hit, though we got the worst of it.  Estimates vary, but the numbers involved were huge.  In addition to the 500,000 Christian Assyrians and Greeks who were eliminated, 1.5 million Armenians were also killed.  My grandfather and namesake John the Baptist was one of them.

A week ago I visited my family’s home community in Adapazari, Turkey, a tidy little town, quite pleasant, actually, but found no mention of the Armenian quarter that was once a thriving and peaceful part of the region. The picture above is of the 1908 graduating class of the town’s Armenian Girls High School, taken when my grandparents were part of the community.  I might well have had a family member in the photo, which reflects a significant Armenian presence in the area.

But as far as the town is now concerned, its Armenian heritage is non-existent.  

Otherwise rich in detail about its archeological remains and anthropological history, there is no mention of the Armenian community ever having even lived in Adapazari in the local museum.

This is an affront to history and intellectual honesty, and it doesn’t occur casually.  I have no doubt the same scenario exists in all the towns of Turkey in which there was a significant Armenian population.

Why the absence of any history of the Armenians?

It is a result of a long-standing policy in Turkey that continues to deny the genocide and endeavors to scrub it out of official existence.  

One major means of doing so is through its schools. Much has been written about how Turkey has banned teaching of its genocide, which comes as no surprise, considering that this is a country that has even banned mention of the Armenian genocide in its parliament. The government has institutionalized a whitewash of its own history.

And that gets me to South Dakota.

Native Americans in our state are understandably concerned over Gov. Kristi Noem’s executive order to ban the teaching of “critical race theory” (CRT) in South Dakota’s schools. Signed last April, Noem said "Our children will not be taught that they are racists or that they are victims, and they will not be compelled to feel responsible for the mistakes of their ancestors."  That’s a nice sentiment but ignores the reality that historical mistreatment is a fact and that current generations of students need to understand our history as they grapple with difficult relationships in our schools and communities.  

Knowing what happened to my forebears at, say, Adana, Turkey, in 1909, means knowing that they lost everything, including their lives.  This is something that Armenians will resent forever. Having grown up among the generation whose social and economic circumstances were affected by the genocide, I know that the hatred and bitterness can’t be mandated away by ignoring or whitewashing the events in schools.  

People know their history.

This is why Noem’s edict is destined for futility. I don’t know what she means by teaching history in a way that will avoid making children feel responsible for or victimized by the ugliness that occurred during this country’s westward expansion, but she is pipe-dreaming if she thinks Native American kids won’t feel the reverberations that stemmed from incidents like Wounded Knee or the Sand Creek massacre. Those occurrences can’t be taught without exposing the fact that they were systemic applications of the hatred directed at their forebears. I’d like to see the study guide developed by Noem’s initiative that teaches those bloody incidents in a way that will keep kids from figuring out who the good guys and the bad guys were. These things need to be presented in their full awfulness, which is the only base from which reconciliation can begin.  There’s a Bible verse that covers it:  “The truth shall set you free.”

Noem says she doesn’t want students to feel like victims.  So how will she teach history in a way that the kids studying it won’t feel victimized?  Can’t be done.  Why?  Because the reality is that many of these children are victims of circumstances created by the history of westward expansion, whether we want to acknowledge it or not.

Take it from the son of an Armenian family that lost everything, including its patriarch, during the Turkish holocaust. The only way to settle the issue is by getting all the facts on the table, not by presenting events in a way that’s designed to avoid hard feelings.  

John Tsitrian is a businessman and writer from the Black Hills. He was a weekly columnist for the Rapid City Journal for twenty years. His articles and commentary have also appeared in The Los Angeles Times, The Denver Post and The Omaha World-Herald. Tsitrian served in the Marines for three years (1966-69), including a 13-month tour of duty as a radioman in Vietnam.

Parukh incident was a blow not only to Artsakh, but also to Russian peacekeepers – FM Babayan

Save

Share

 15:19, 20 June 2022

YEREVAN, JUNE 20, ARMENPRESS. The incident in the village of Parukh was a blow not only to Artsakh, but also to the Russian peacekeepers. That incident was terrorism, blow both to us and the peacekeeping mission, Foreign Minister of Artsakh Davit Babayan said at a meeting with reporters in the permanent representation of Artsakh in Armenia.

He stated that no matter when and where terrorism occurred, it should not go unanswered.

“The fate of Artsakh is under danger. If we lose Artsakh, there will be no Armenia. We have an absolute opportunity to have normal relations with all because we have Diaspora. And there is a country in the face of Azerbaijan where Armenophobia and terrorism are a state policy, and the Russian peacekeepers have also seen this, who have become the target”, the FM said, adding: “We now are de facto an independent country, and to think that we could be part of Azerbaijan is unacceptable”.