Torture, Cultural Genocide One Year After Nagorno-Karabakh War

LA Progressive
Sept 29 2021

Ayear ago on September 27, as part of Turkey’s imperialist Strategic Depth Doctrine, which aims to build a neo-Ottoman Empire, Azerbaijan with Turkish aid, attacked the indigenous Armenian people of Nagorno Karabakh using cluster bombs, phosphorous munitions, drone warfare, and mercenaries. In 44 days, the onslaught and ensuing war killed more than 5,000 people, including approximately 150 civilians, at least 13 of whom were children. In the end, Azerbaijan seized the region known to Armenians as Artsakh, displacing approximately 130,000 Indigenous people whose ancestry traces to the region for thousands of years.

A new report by the Human Rights Defender of the Republic of Armenia suggests egregious human rights violations, including crimes against humanity committed by Azerbaijan, such as physical and psychological torture of POWs and civilian captives. Electroshocked and beaten with metal chains, gun butts and batons, Armenian captives were forced to disclose sensitive information and make false confession, the report said. Among sustained permanent injuries, one man has been rendered blind. The report also noted video and photos of beheaded Armenians during the ceasefire period, which is a war crime whether or not the beheading was the cause of their deaths. As of this writing, approximately 45 Armenians remain in Azerbaijani detention while others are still missing, according to the report.

Electroshocked and beaten with metal chains, gun butts and batons, Armenian captives were forced to disclose sensitive information and make false confession.

Azerbaijan has also continued what some experts call the worst cultural genocide of the 21st century to date. Already, in what has been interpreted as an attempt to erase traces of the region’s indigenous Armenian people, Azerbaijan has destroyed at least 89 medieval churches, 5,840 uniquely Armenian khatchkars (intricately carved cross stones), and 22,000 historical tombstones in a region known as Nakhichevan. Despite UNESCO’s 2000 urgent order to preserve the remaining monuments, Azerbaijan took sledgehammers to much of what had remained, including Armenia’s largest medieval cemetery that featured 10,000 cross-stones. As part of the latest conflict and ceasefire agreement, Azerbaijan has now taken Artsakh’s land and with it, centuries of cultural heritage.

Mass killing, torture, falsification of history, and destruction of antiquities, has long been practiced by Azerbaijan’s strategic war-partner, Turkey, which over the past century, has successfully eradicated Armenians, Assyrians, and Greeks from their historic homelands and erased much of their existence there. Destroying ancient culture and art continues today in Turkish occupied Cyprus.

These types of acts—inflicting cruelties, such as torture on other humans and erasing their cultural heritage and existence—usually occur in tandem with mass dissemination of dehumanization, blame and fabricated histories, ancestry, ownership, and belonging, according to political communication studies. In their thirst for more power and land, malignant leaders design these parallel “frame wars” to provoke hate and rage in their own populations, then use those emotions to enlist, motivate, and unleash the wrath of soldiers and civilians onto the targeted people to justify lethality and plunder valuable property.

In this case of Nagorno-Karabakh, or Artsakh, Azerbaijan is no exception, according to our examination of its state media agency AZERTAC (also Azertag) from the period of 27 September 2020 until July 30, 2021. Like so many extremist leaders before, Azerbaijan’s leadership is using its media to aid in ethnically cleansing people from their indigenous lands, inflicting physical and psychological torture, erasing them from the region entirety, and erasing traces of history itself. Rife with dehumanization and demonization of Armenians on par with the Rwandan Genocide, the Holocaust and the nationalist media in the former Yugoslavia, the Azerbaijan government media portrayed Armenians as animals, savages, barbarians, fascists, criminals, vandals, wild beasts, or Neo-Nazis in more than half of the 60 articles examined. “We have defeated the savages . . . saved the region from savages and fascists,” said Azerbaijan’s President Aliyev in one August AZERTAC report. In another, the city of Fuzuli, he said, “was in the hands of wild beasts, in the hands of predators.”,

Embedded within a “good-versus-evil” framing in which “our side” are the “good” and “they” are the evil who are destroying something sacred, the Azerbaijani state media agency falsely accused Armenians of a range of crimes and international violations while branding itself a “civil nation.”  Despite DNA evidence of Armenians’ 7800-year presence in Artsakh, for example, Azerbaijan’s state media falsely accused Armenians of illegal occupation and of fabricating its ancient identity. Armenians “exploited our lands,” said president Aliyev in the state media agency. “There has never been Armenian land here, and there never will be. This is the land of Azerbaijan. We, the Azerbaijanis, the owners of these lands, have returned.”

Similarly, while Azerbaijan has been destroying Armenian cultural heritage sites in an attempt to erase a people, its media has instead accused Armenians of ethnic and cultural erasure, calling it “evidence of Armenian savagery.” In its post-ceasefire efforts to rewrite the history of Artsakh, Azerbaijan’s state media agency falsely claimed that Armenian antiquity, such as the ancient khachkars, were created in a modern workshop and subsequently buried  to lay claim for the region. Their monuments, it has labelled, not as Armenian, but “Caucasian Albanian.”

In contrast, Armenian state media has largely refrained from resorting to dehumanizing stereotypes of the Azerbaijani people. It did, however, refer to the Azerbaijani government’s policies as “fascist.” After vandals attacked Kanach Zham in Shushi (St. John the Baptist church), for example, the Armenian media called the actions of the Azerbaijani government “against Armenian cultural heritage” the “continuation and the embodiment of the fascist policy in a disgusting and dangerous manner.” It went on to compare the destruction of historic churches akin to acts of terrorism, noting the Taliban’s destruction of the Buddha statues of Bamiyan.

While the international community has failed to stop the great violence inflicted on the people and culture of Artsakh/Nagorno Karabakh, there is still time to repair, redress, and restore the survivors and what remains of their cultural heritage, while preventing the utter destruction of their history. It is imperative to put those wheels of justice in motion immediately to stem the monumental losses, stop them from becoming permanent, and send a signal that human rights still matter.

Maria Armoudian and Olivia Guyodo

Azerbaijan hands remains of three Armenian militaries over to Nagorno-Karabakh

Caucasian Knot, EU
Sept 29 2021

The remains of the servicemen who perished during the hostilities in Nagorno-Karabakh have been handed over to Karabakh rescuers. The total number of the remains of the Armenian militaries found has reached 1673, the Nagorno-Karabakh Emergency Service has informed.

The "Caucasian Knot" has reported that on September 24, in Shushi, the Azerbaijani party handed the remains of a serviceman over to Karabakh rescuers. Then, the total number of bodies and remains of Armenian militaries found reached 1670.

The transfer of the remains of the above three perished servicemen to the Armenian party was held on September 28 in Shushi, the Nagorno-Karabakh Emergency Service has reported in its Facebook page. A forensic medical examination has been appointed to identify the casualties, the report says.

The total number of bodies and remains of Armenian military servicemen found in the Karabakh conflict zone has reached 1673, rescuers have informed.

This article was originally published on the Russian page of 24/7 Internet agency ‘Caucasian Knot’ on September 29, 2021 at 04:00 am MSK. To access the full text of the article, click here.

Author: The Caucasian Knot;

Source: 
© Caucasian Knot

Newspaper: Armenia PM terrified again

News.am, Armenia
Sept 29 2021

YEREVAN. – Iravunk daily of Armenia writes: According to the news we have received, Nikol Pashinyan, who works as Prime Minister in Armenia, is terrified again.

The thing is that the latter has further increased his own security.

Probably we all remember that after the 44-day [Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh)] war [last fall], Nikol Pashinyan, according to press reports, had already increased his security. But it is not known why he is afraid again now.

Moscow sees Yerevan’s, Baku’s positive mindset towards package agreements, Russian diplomat says

Panorama, Armenia
Sept 30 2021

Russia sees Armenia’s and Azerbaijan’s positive mindset towards mutually acceptable package agreements on Nagorno-Karabakh, Russian Foreign Ministry Deputy Spokesperson Alexei Zaitsev said on Thursday, according to TASS news agency. 

"It is very important to ensure possibilities for finding mutually acceptable solutions" on the Nagorno-Karabakh settlement, he said. "The readiness for opening a new page in relations and their gradual normalization expressed at the top level both by Baku and Yerevan is a confirmation of the objective need for such a mindset. We focus our efforts on such positive things."

"On our part, we see Yerevan’s and Baku’s positive mindset towards reaching mutually acceptable package agreements, which will make it possible to bring the joint work up to the level of project cooperation," he said.

According to the Russian diplomat, Moscow sees a "lasting and sustainable solution" to the "problem of incidents at certain sections of the Armenian-Azerbaijani border" in the establishment of a commission on the state border delimitation with its subsequent demarcation. "The Russian side outlined and referred to Yerevan’s and Baku’s consideration proposals on the launch of a corresponding negotiating process. We are waiting for a response from the partners," he added.

September 21, Armenia’s Independence Day, Losing its Momentum

BY MADELEINE M. MEZAGOPIAN

With Armenia heading farther away from the true spirit of being independent, does the second independence of Armenia of September 21, 1991* represent an occasion to celebrate or simply an occasion to contemplate on how to preserve Armenia’s existence amid growing domestic and external threats?

Armenia receives the anniversary of its Second Republic amid emerging new world order, evolving regional and international powers and accompanying change in balances of power, and foremost amidst uncertainty and undeclared preferences by neighboring and far countries e.g. Russia and USA.

Thus, urgent need arises for all Armenians in Diaspora and in Motherland Armenia to concert efforts towards not only preserving Armenia’s independence, but foremost to preserve Armenia’s existence per se.

While life goes on as usual with Armenians in Motherland Armenia and in Diaspora and somehow their suffering of being hypnotized and insensitive to the ongoing and growing existential threats of Motherland Armenia. Parts of Armenian Artsakh were ceded to neighboring Azerbaijan thus bringing it and its ally Turkey closer to the heart of Armenia (1).

A day doesn’t pass without Armenia losing another hero protecting its borders while Armenia’s leadership considers normalization and rapprochement with Armenia’s past and present enemy Turkey whose leadership continues uprooting Armenian historical sites on occupied Armenian territories and sponsoring Azerbaijan’s expansionist schemes in Armenian Artsakh and further.

Hence, revisiting the past velvet revolution and the struggle to uproot corruption and those with external affiliations in the homeland Armenia is gaining further urgency.

Thus, should be a day of determination to rescue Armenia from extinction rather a day to celebrate an independence that lost its momentum with the arrival of an acquiescent leadership. A leadership that ceded to the enemy not only precious Shushi, but even parts of the Homeland Armenia thus undermining Armenia’s sacrifices and betraying its martyrs.

With the current leadership in Armenia unable to protect its borders and ceding its responsibility to Russia, September 21 should be a day of grief for all Armenians for compromising its sovereignty if not losing its independence to Russia, which in the past gave parts of Armenia to Turkey and Azerbaijan and debilitated the spirit, the culture and the civilization of Armenia.

This year, September 21 should be a day for Armenians to acknowledge that Armenia is on its own after complete indifference by all key actors while Armenians suffered its fourth genocide and mass human rights abuses during and in the aftermath of Armenian Artsakh’s existential war.

September 21 ceases to be a day of celebration, but rather a day for Armenians to ask forgiveness from their martyrs for not rewarding their sacrifices rather betraying their memory through rewarding the enemy.

September 21, should be a day for Armenians to promise their martyrs to finally realize genuine velvet revolution and eventually establish a true, neutral and united independent Armenia with a leadership solely loyal to Armenia and to the Armenian nation while establishing solid bridges with all key actors worldwide thus best serving Armenia’s national interests.

  • On May 27, 1990, different parts of Armenia, the Armenian Soviet Socialist Armenia, witnessed confrontations between the newly established Armenian army (NAA) and the troops of the Soviet Ministry of Internal Affairs (MVD). On August 23, 1990, Armenia declared its sovereignty over Soviet laws. On September 21, 1991, Armenia declared its independence and on July 5, 1995, the new constitution of Armenia was adopted and the Second Republic of Armenia was born.
  1. On September 27, 2020, Turkey, taking advantage of its own expansionist policies in the Mediterranean, targeting both European and Arab states, and unleashing terrorists in several European states and of USA preoccupation with controversial historical elections, hand in hand with Azerbaijan and Turkish trained terrorists of multi nationalities declared war and attacked Armenian Artsakh (Nagorno Karabakh). On November 9, 2020, a ceasefire agreement, mediated by Russia, was signed between Armenia, Russia and Azerbaijan surrendering parts of Armenian Artsakh to Azerbaijan.

Madeleine M. Mezagopian is scholar and an academician based in Amman, Jordan.




Slovakia supports efforts of OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs – Foreign Minister

Save

Share

 11:52, 14 September, 2021

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 14, ARMENPRESS. Slovakia appreciates Armenia’s efforts aimed at establishing peace and stability in the region, Minister of Foreign and European Affairs Ivan Korčok said at the joint press conference with his Armenian counterpart Ararat Mirzoyan in Yerevan.

He expressed hope that new processes are launching in the region, after more than 30 years of insecurity, which would eventually lead to reconciliation.

“The meeting touched upon the Nagorno Karabakh conflict. We were attaching great importance to refraining from any action having a potential for escalation. We also highlight the complete implementation of the commitments assumed by the November 9 statement. Every conflict leads to sufferings of ordinary people. If there is a will, determination to achieve peace, every conflict is possible to solve. As an EU member state we continue supporting the efforts of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs. We welcome the actions aimed at strengthening trust, such as the return of the Armenian prisoners of war, who are held in Azerbaijan. The return of Armenian POWs and civilians held there must continue, and also conditions must be provided for conducting demining in order to prevent additional losses”, the Slovak FM said.

Minister of Foreign and European Affairs of Slovakia Ivan Korčok arrived in Armenia on an official visit on September 13.

 

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

Moscow supports the intensification of OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs’ efforts on Karabakh settlement

Save

Share

 19:02, 2 September, 2021

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 2, ARMENPRESS. Moscow supports the intensification of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs’ efforts on Karabakh settlement based on the existing mandate, ARMENPRESS reports representative of the Foreign Ministry of Russia Maria Zakharova said.

‘’In the context of the adequate monitoring of the new regional realities, we believe that the troika (the Co-Chairs) can contribute to the strengthening of trust between Yerevan and Baku, as well as to the solution of humanitarian issues. This would give an opportunity to set to the discussions of political issues… The new Russian Co-chair of the OSCE Minsk Group Igor Khovayev is currently on a regional trip. He has already held talks with the Azerbaijani leadership, similar meetings are scheduled in Yerevan’’, she said.

Pashinyan proposes Russian border posts along entire Armenia-Azerbaijan frontier

July 30 2021






By Neil Hauer in Yerevan July 30, 2021
Following clashes, Pashinyan as proposed Moscow secure the whole border.


Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has suggested that Russian border posts be placed along the entirety of the Armenian-Azerbaijani border to secure its safe demarcation, with simmering tensions between the two South Caucasus nations threatening to boil over once more.

On July 28, three Armenian soldiers were killed in what was the deadliest clash between Armenia and Azerbaijan since the end of last autumn's Nagorno-Karabakh war. Clashes have become more frequent along the border since mid-May.

Speaking at a government session on July 29, Pashinyan also said that observers from the member states of the Russian-led Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) could also monitor the border, adding that the Minsk Group of the Organization of Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and other formats could be acceptable alternatives to secure a peaceful border delimitation.

Internationally mediated negotiations involving the Minsk Group co-chaired by Russia, the US, and France have been unable to produce a lasting settlement of the conflict.

"As a member of the CSTO, Armenia, which will take over the chairmanship in the organisation in September, fully understands its responsibility to avoid threats to the CSTO's security and stay away from involving allies in armed conflicts, and I officially exclude any provocative actions from Armenia's armed forces," Pashinyan said. The CSTO groups Armenia, Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said in Moscow shortly after Pashinyan’s statement that "Russia continues contacting Yerevan and Baku to secure the implementation of the three-party agreements". The Russia-brokered agreements brought the 44-day war between Armenia and Azerbaijan to an end last November.

Fighting ended with Baku regaining control over parts of the breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh and all seven adjacent districts that were under ethnic Armenian control for almost 30 years. Under the ceasefire deal, around 2,000 Russian peacekeeper troops were deployed to in and around Nagorno-Karabakh to keep the peace.

The war claimed at least 6,900 lives.

 

Three dead in Armenia-Azeri clashes

Western Advocate, Australia

Armenia's defence ministry said in a statement that Azeri forces had attacked Armenian positions near the border between the two countries.

Two Armenian servicemen had been injured in the same incident, it said, and "fighting continued".

Azerbaijan's defence ministry accused Armenian forces of what it called "provocations" in the Kalbajar district and said its army would continue to retaliate, Russia's TASS news agency reported.

Interfax later reported that Azerbaijan had however accepted a Russian proposal to enforce a ceasefire in the area.

The incident was one of the deadliest since a six-week war between ethnic Armenian forces and Baku over the Nagorno-Karabakh region and surrounding areas ended last year.

In six weeks of fighting last September to November, Azeri troops drove ethnic Armenian forces out of swathes of territory they had controlled since the 1990s in and around the Nagorno-Karabakh region, before Russia brokered a ceasefire.

A simmering border dispute between the two has since flared up, with both sides accusing each other of separate incursions into each others' territory in recent months, highlighting the fragility of the ceasefire.

Australian Associated Press

Aleksander Iskandaryan speaking about the political future

JAM News
<img height="1" width="1" st1yle="display:none" src=”"https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=145311314291474&ev=PageView&noscript=1" />

    JAMnews, Yerevan

Director of the Caucasus Institute, political scientist Alexander Iskandaryan speaking about the political future of Armenia, admitted the likelihood of repeated elections “in a year and a half” – despite the fact that early parliamentary elections were held in Armenia on June 20.

“I don’t think there can be any progress in the Karabakh issue in the near future. Azerbaijan practically refuses to discuss the Karabakh problem”, he said at a press conference. According to Alexander Iskandaryan, today and in the near future, the format of discussing the Karabakh problem itself is unlikely to appear.

The political scientist also commented on the process of returning Armenian prisoners of war who are still being held in Azerbaijan after the second Karabakh war. In his opinion, Baku is not inclined to return all Armenian prisoners, thus, “the bargaining will continue for a long time”.


  • Armenia to receive substantial financial assistance from the EU
  • Armenia’s Constitutional Court to assess validity of snap parliamentary elections

Alexander Iskandaryan began the press conference with the issue of the settlement of the Karabakh conflict. He stressed that the trilateral document on the armistice, which was signed by the leaders of Armenia, Russia and Azerbaijan in the fall of 2020, is not a solution to the Karabakh problem:

“It was an agreement on a ceasefire, a suspension of the war, nothing more. There is not a single word about status, guarantees, procedures, and negotiations – I mean about Artsakh”.

Accordingly, according to the expert, now the Republic of Armenia in its relationship with Azerbaijan faces several questions:

“This is the problem of borders, that is, those territories that Azerbaijan is slowly biting off from Armenia; the problem of stability on these borders, that is, ensuring security (apparently, the decision was made with the help of a third party, that is, Russia); the problem of roads, that is, the opening of communications around Armenia ”.

According to Iskandaryan, these were the issues discussed at the meeting of the acting Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan with Russian President Vladimir Putin, which took place on July 7 in Moscow.

Putin congratulated Pashinyan on his victory in the elections, stressing that the elections in Armenia showed the people’s confidence in Pashinyan, and this is “the most important condition for the further development of the country”.

“In fact, if we translate from ‘Putin’s language’ into the common human language, Putin said that they are ready to work with the current government of Armenia”, the political scientist believes.

For the fourth day, the Constitutional Court of Armenia has been considering the issue of invalidating the results of the early parliamentary elections, which took place on June 20.

After the announcement of the final results of the voting, four political forces at once addressed the Constitutional Court with this demand.

Alexander Iskandaryan believes that the decision of the constitutional court “will not be able to change the political reality”. The opposition parties will nevertheless enter the parliament of the new convocation and will not boycott its mandates.

Moreover, formally, according to the political scientist, the alignment of political forces in it will be the same as in the past: one party received the majority, almost ⅔ of the votes, and there will be two more opposition parties – one of them has more mandates than the other:

“In reality, if you approach it not formally and look at the composition, then these two opposition parties are not at all what they were before. Before that, there were both parties that supported Pashinyan and his My Step during the 2018 revolution […]. These were the parties that posed as opposition but were associated with the Pashinyan regime”.

The new opposition, the political scientist believes, is “different”, and the parliament will now represent society more than it did before:

“There are a certain number of people in society who quite radically reject the power of Pashinyan and his associates, and they are represented in parliament. Society is paralyzed and split, parliament is paralyzed and split. Accordingly, they are unlikely to be able to influence politics in a serious way, but, of course, there will be discourses”.

According to Iskandaryan, “the next early elections” may take place in a year and a half:

“Because the political crisis has not gone anywhere, the Karabakh issue has not disappeared at all, Mr. Aliyev will continue to play in the Armenian internal political field, the split in society will remain and will not go anywhere, the power will fall, simply because it is power”.

After the second Karabakh war, one of the most acute problems in Armenian society is the return of prisoners of war who have been held in Azerbaijan for months. Moreover, in Baku, they are not considered prisoners of war but are treated as saboteurs and terrorists.

Alexander Iskandaryan believes that Azerbaijan is not inclined to return all POWs:

“Azerbaijan took them prisoner and is trading this factor, they are ready to make transfers in exchange for something [the last two times Baku returned 15 Armenian prisoners in exchange for mine maps of the territories that came under the control of the Azerbaijani side after the war – JAMnews].

This process is underway and, I think, will continue in approximately the same mode. I think that the process will be long – months if not years, because I cannot imagine that they will immediately give up all the prisoners of war. I would like to be wrong, but it seems to me that Azerbaijan is not inclined to give all of them up, since it would be logical for them to keep some number of prisoners and bargain for a long time”.