Osipyan rules out use of Police’s administrative resource during upcoming parliamentary elections

Category
Politics

Police Chief of Armenia Valeri Osipyan rules out that the Police will use its administrative resource during the upcoming early parliamentary elections.

“I have announced during the Yerevan City Council elections that no police officer has a right to guide anyone.

Everyone is free in his/her actions, choice. Everyone decides himself/herself the country’s future. No one has a right to force, dictate, no such thing has happened and will not happen so that we use our administrative resource”, he told reporters after today’s Cabinet meeting.

Master of the French chanson who never forgot his Armenian heritage

The Independent – UK
October 3, 2018 Wednesday
Master of the French chanson who never forgot his Armenian heritage
 
by SPENCER LEIGH
 
 
It would be difficult to place the master practitioners of the French chanson in order of merit, but Charles Aznavour, who has died aged 94, was unique with his vast output, his aptitude to write compassionately about intensely personal matters and his ability to perform 90-minute concerts even in his nineties in the world's major theatres. A box set of no less than 60 CDs released in 2015 stands testament to his body of work.
 
He was not an angry writer like Jacques Brel nor sex-obsessed like Serge Gainsbourg and this worked in his favour as middle-of-the-road audiences around the world wanted to hear him sing "She", "The Old-Fashioned Way" and "Yesterday When I Was Young", but many of his best known songs were queasy rather than easy listening.
 
"For all his success, Charles Aznavour is very underrated," says Marc Almond, whose career began with Soft Cell. "He and Jacques Brel had so much in common although in other ways they were miles apart. Aznavour is much more sentimental and nostalgic than Brel, who was world-weary and cynical, although both can be romantic. The general public thinks that 'She' and songs like that are all that Aznavour did and they are so wrong. It is a huge and varied catalogue."
 
When I saw Charles Aznavour at the Royal Albert Hall in 2015, he introduced Herbert Kretzmer by saying he had been "working for me over the years", which made his English lyricist sound like his roadie. In fact, Aznavour's sensitive and poetic lyrics have been beautifully served by Kretzmer, who also persuaded him in 1974 to write the theme music for a London Weekend Television drama series, The Seven Faces Of Woman.
 
"They wanted a song about a woman's mystique," Kretzmer told me, "and I felt it should be a song about a woman as seen by a man, and what better man than Charles Aznavour, who sings about love and romance. I brought him into the project and it turned out terribly well."
 
But writing that theme song was no easy ride: "The first verse could only run for 35 seconds, the time before the play began, and it had to run over the main titles and be complete in itself. Then it had to be stretched out for a record so that it did not sound like padding. At the time Aznavour was touring all over the place and it took some time to get a melody from him. The moment he played me that long, opening note, the word 'She' jumped into my mind and I knew we had the song."
 
"She" topped the UK charts and was again a hit in 1999 when Elvis Costello revived it for the opening credits of the film Notting Hill. After singing "She" in 2015, Aznavour joked, "I think, 'Who is this stupid man who demands these long notes', but then I realise the songwriter is me."
 
Although Charles Aznavour was born in Paris in 1924, he did not consider himself a Frenchman. "I am Armenian," he told me proudly in 1979. "Everybody figures that I am a Frenchman because I sing in French. I act like a Frenchman and I have all the symptoms of a Frenchman but my parents are Armenian."
 
His parents, Mamignon (known as Misha) and Knar Aznavourian, had left Armenia when the Turks started killing the Armenians. Aznavour was to write about it in "Ils Sont Tombés (They Fell)" in 1975:
 
And I am of that race
 
Who died in unknown places
 
Who perished in their pride
 
Whose blood in rivers ran
 
His father Misha ran a small restaurant in Paris but it never made much money because Misha would feel obliged to feed any homeless Armenian adrift in the city. He imbued his son with a love of singing, while his mother showed him how to write poetry in Armenian. He went to an acting school, appearing in his first film when he was nine years old. He was to appear in several French, English and American films, usually in cameos. He played the title role in Tirez sur le Pianist ("Shoot The Piano Player"), a 1960 film directed by Francois Truffaut.
 
In 1942 Aznavour teamed up with Pierre Roche and they wrote and performed songs together including one of his best-known "J'ai bu (I drank)", often singing in the Forbidden Zone in war-torn Paris. Aznavour and his family helped the resistance by hiding Jews who were on the run. After the war, Roche and Aznavour had success in cabaret in Canada but Aznavour's first wife wanted to return to France, while Roche wanted to marry a Canadian girl.
 
Now performing on his own, Aznavour was championed by the leading French singer, Edith Piaf. Piaf was always looking for good songs as Aznavour explained: "I think 'Il Pleut' was the first song that Piaf liked of mine and she recorded seven of them. No. I correct that. I translated Frankie Laine's 'Jezebel' for her and that makes it seven and a half. When I gave her 'Je hais les Dimanches (I Hate Sundays)', she said, 'Give that to an existentialist singer.' I took her at her word and gave it to Juliette Gréco. She was up in arms when she heard what I had done. She said, 'You idiot! You have given my song to that girl. Now I'll have to show how to sing it.' So Piaf made a record of it too."
 
Aznavour was never one of Piaf's lovers, but she did arrange for him to have a new nose: "I am very glad about that. I used to use up as many handkerchiefs as a whole orphanage." Although Aznavour was no pin-up, he had a very compelling look. Like Piaf, he performed with multiple gestures and he often acted out his songs like Marcel Marceau, being a frustrated painter in "La Bohème". It certainly helped when he was performing French songs to an English audience.
 
Aznavour was impressed by the way Charles Trenet could put poetical thoughts and images into his songs. Even when he was a young man, Aznavour was writing about death and old age, never better than in "Yesterday When I was Young (Hier Encore)", first released in 1964.
 
Yesterday the moon was blue
 
And every crazy day brought something new to do
 
I used my magic age as if it were a wand
 
And never saw the waste and emptiness beyond
 
In the rock world, there has been much critical commentary about Bob Dylan, Paul McCartney, Paul Simon and Warren Zevon writing about ageing but it was state normal for Aznavour, almost his default position. In later years, he would joke on stage: "My songs have been waiting for me to get old."
 
In January 1964 the Beatles were becoming the biggest selling and most popular act in the world. They were very successful at the Paris Olympia but for all that the best-selling record in France was Charles Aznavour's "La mamma", although the Beatles had two songs in the Top 10. "La Mamma" was given an English lyric, "For Mama", by Don Black and it became a UK hit for Matt Monro.
 
In 1973 Aznavour found international success with "The Old Fashioned Way (Les Plaisirs Démodés)" which had been prompted by the friction between the rock and the pop singers in France. He famously performed it at the Royal Variety Performance in 1975 when he turned his back on the audience and pretended he was being caressed by his partner. With the Goodies mocking him as well, soon the whole of the UK was impersonating "Charles Aznovoice".
 
The B-side of the French single of "Les Plaisirs Démodés" was "Comme ils dissent", which he recorded in English as "What Makes a Man". It is a highly sensitive song about a drag act in a striptease bar and his relationships with those around him:
 
Each night the men look so surprised
 
I change my sex before their eyes
 
Tell me if you can
 
What makes a man a man?
 
The song was recorded by Marc Almond in 1992: "I love that song as it has a beginning and an end and it tells a story. I first saw it performed by a drag queen who was removing the makeup and wig and dress as he sang and then he put on his raincoat and fedora and went into the street. I would love to do it that way myself but I can't really see myself in heels and a wig."
 
Aznavour liked writing about subjects that were new to popular songs. He painted a bleak picture of married life in "You've Let Yourself Go (Tu t'laisses aller)", in which his partner is now argumentative and overweight, but at the same time the song is considerate and sympathetic. Similarly, there is the frustration of "Happy Anniversary (Bon Anniversaire)" where everything that could go wrong does go wrong on his 20th wedding anniversary.
 
"I loved working on his songs," says Herbert Kretzmer, "I'm generalising but the American songwriters have only got two themes – one is 'Life is good, hooray!', and the other is 'Life is awful, let's sing the blues about it.' They think that covers the spectrum, but Aznavour covers the infinite complexities of life."
 
Although Aznavour could speak good English, he was unsure about writing English lyrics himself. "When I first came to England, I heard people saying 'Shit, I've done this' or 'Shit, I've done that' and I wrote 'Pretty Shitty Days'. I didn't know that it was not a nice word."
 
Jack Jones recorded a tribute album Write Me A Love Song, Charlie in 1975 and as his songs were being recorded by the world's most popular singers, he became wealthy, but in 1976 he was found guilty of illegally channelling his earnings into Switzerland and was fined 10 million francs. He showed no remorse about this in his autobiography, Yesterday When I Was Young, in 1979, writing "It is useless to argue with them." But Aznavour was not an avaricious man, undertaking much charitable work, especially for survivors from the earthquake in Armenia in 1988.
 
Aznavour often toured with Liza Minnelli and they made a passionate live album, Paris – Palais des Congrès: Intégrale du Spectacle in 1995. Minnelli's performance of his song "Sailor Boys" is a high point of both their careers. Minnelli was one of the guests on another double CD, Duos (2008), in which celebrities such as Elton John, Carole King and Sting joined him for English and French versions of the same song. With the aid of modern technology, he joined Frank Sinatra on "You Make Me Feel So Young", a rare example of Aznavour not singing his own material. Although Bob Dylan was not included, he has performed Aznavour's "The Times We've Known (Les Bons Moments)" in concert.
 
As Aznavour was a proud man with a fear of rejection, he would never ask Herbert Kretzmer to write an English lyric for one of his songs. Rather, he would play him the original version and wait for Kretzmer to ask if he could do something with it. Kretzmer felt that his musical Lautrec was not right for the West End and passed on it, and it only lasted a few weeks in 2000. More recently, it has been substantially reworked for a Broadway show My Paris in 2016.
 
Aznavour married his third wife, the model Ulla Thorsell, in Las Vegas in 1967 and outside of touring and writing, he spent his later years with his children and grandchildren, one of his granddaughters being a backing vocalist for him. He enjoyed performing to the end, his final concert appearances being in Japan in September. "Some singers have their voices enhanced with technical tricks. There is nothing anyone can do with this broken voice. This is my real voice you are hearing." There was never any doubt about that.
 
Chalnough Vaghnag Aznavourian, Charles Aznavour, singer and songwriter, born 22 May 1924 Paris, married Micheline Ragel (divorced); one daughter; married Evelyne Plessis (divorced); married Ulla Thorsell 1967; two sons, one daughter; died, 1 October 2018, Mouriés, France
 
 
 

Azerbaijani Press: Armenia willing to return to previous format of Karabakh talks – Azerbaijani expert

AzerNews, Azerbaijan
Oct 1 2018

By  Trend

After the meeting of Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, the harsh rhetoric and statements voiced by the Armenian side on the settlement of the Armenia-Azerbaijan Nagorno-Karabakh conflict were put to an end at the CIS summit in Dushanbe city, Bahruz Guliyev, editor-in-chief of the Azerbaijani newspaper “Ses”, political expert, told Trend.

He noted that the claims of the Armenian side about changing the format of the negotiation process, that is, about participation in these negotiations of the illegal regime established in the occupied Azerbaijani territories, were removed from the agenda of the settlement.

“This once again confirmed that Armenia is a party to the conflict, and further negotiations will be conducted with this country,” said Guliyev. “Only in this way a procedure for normal negotiations can be established and it is possible to achieve results.”

 

Touching upon another important outcome of the meeting, he said that the decision made to create additional operational communication mechanisms to curb incidents on the contact line of troops and at the borders will play a role in resolving the conflict.

“Undoubtedly, this agreement is an indicator of diplomatic policy pursued by President Ilham Aliyev, and the next decisions to be made between the parties may contribute to the peaceful settlement of the conflict,” Guliyev said. “That’s because it is obvious that the Armenian side is already willing to return to the previous format of the negotiations.”

The conflict between the two South Caucasus countries began in 1988 when Armenia made territorial claims against Azerbaijan. As a result of the ensuing war, in 1992 Armenian armed forces occupied 20 percent of Azerbaijan, including the Nagorno-Karabakh region and seven surrounding districts.

The 1994 ceasefire agreement was followed by peace negotiations. Armenia has not yet implemented four UN Security Council resolutions on withdrawal of its armed forces from the Nagorno-Karabakh and the surrounding districts.

Knights of Vartan Meet US Ambassador to Armenia

Press Release

 

"Knights
of Vartan" Communication Office

2
Arshagunyats Ave, 

Yerevan,
Armenia

Contact:
Gohar Palyan, Liaison

Tel:
+374 94 20 64 68

Web:
www.kofv.org

 

 

 

KNIGHTS OF VARTAN MEET US AMBASSADOR
TO ARMENIA

 

(YEREVAN)
– The Knights of Vartan ‘Back to the Homeland’ third mission trip to Armenia took
place September 16-22, 2018, during which the Grand Commander, Dr. Gary
Zamanigian, along with members in leadership positions met the United States
Ambassador to Armenia Richard M.
Mills, Jr. and USAID
Armenia Mission Director Ms. Deborah
Grieser on September 17th.

 

During the meeting Dr. Zamanigian presented the
history and mission of the Knights and Daughters of  Vartan in Armenia and the USA.

 

The organization has been involved with supporting
many projects in Armenia since its independence which include renovation and/or
building of schools, kindergartens, community centers and homes for low income
families; in addition grants are given to scholars which enable them to do
research. Also the Knights and Daughters of Vartan support orphans in
borderline regions.

 

The members expressed how most of their
families have been living in the United States of America for 2 or 3
generations, as a result of the Armenian Genocide in 1915, but their hearts
always belong to Armenia.

 

The US Ambassador informed the group of the
many projects the United States has been supporting in Armenia and that the current
emphasis is on: Agriculture, IT and Tourism. The Knights and Daughters of Vartan
thanked the US Embassy for the support they have provided to the Armenian
people and discussed possible future joint projects.

 

The Knights of Vartan Inc. is a fraternal
leadership and service organization of Armenian men dedicated to safeguarding
and perpetuating the Armenian heritage and cultural traditions. Its membership
represents the spectrum of the leadership of the Armenian community. It was
founded in 1916 in Philadelphia and is based the United States with 24 local
chapters which support Armenian causes around the world. For more information
about the Knights of Vartan, visit .

Davit Tonoyan visits soldier wounded at frontline

Armenia’s Defense Minister Davit Tonoyan on Monday paid a visit to the Ministry of Defense (MOD) Central Clinical Military Hospital, in capital city Yerevan.

MOD Spokesperson Artsrun Hovhannisyan noted that, first, the minister visited serviceman, Private Artur Gevorgyan, who was wounded on September 23, at the frontline.

Minister Davit Tonoyan spoke with the physicians about Artur’s health condition, met with his parents. Artur Gevorgyan’s condition is currently stable. Also, Davit Tonoyan toured the military hospital, met with other patients, discussed matters related to the organization of treatment at the military hospital.

168: Azerbaijan violates ceasefire regime nearly 200 times in a week

Categories
Artsakh
Region

The Azerbaijani troops violated the ceasefire regime nearly 200 times on Artsakh-Azerbaijan contact line in the period of September 2-8, during which over 2000 bullets were fired in the direction of Armenian border guards from different caliber weapons.

As the press service of the Defense Ministry of Artsakh Informed, the front line units of the Defense Army refrained from retaliation and continue to confidently carry out their military duty.

Մտահոգիչ ցուցանիչ. երկրորդ եռամսյակում ուղղակի ներդրումները նվազել են

  • 01.09.2018
  •  

  • Հայաստան
  •  

     

7
 293

ՀՀ վիճակագրական կոմիտեն հրապարակել է 2018 թվականի առաջին կիսամյակի օտարերկրյա ներդրումների ցուցանիշները։


Այդ տվյալների հիման վրա, b4b.am-ը հաշվարկել է օտարերկրյա ներդրումների հոսքերը (ստացումները)՝ 2018 թվականի առաջին և երկրորդ եռամսյակներում և համեմատել դրանք նախորդ տարվա նույն եռամսյակների հետ։


Ինչպես տեսնում եք, 2018 թվականի երկրորդ եռամսյակում կատարվել է 525.5 մլն դոլարի ընդամենը ներդրում, որը 2017 թվականի երկրորդ եռամսյակի ցուցանիշից բարձր է 18 մլն դոլարով կամ 3.5%-ով։ Առաջին եռամսյակում ընդամենը ներդրումների աճն ավելի մեծ էր՝ 116.4 մլն դոլար կամ 22.5%։


Ուղղակի ներդրումների գծով ստացումները հակառակը՝ նվազել են։ Ընդ որում, եթե առաջին եռամսյակում նվազումը մեծ չէր՝ 8 մլն դոլար կամ 4.1 մլն դոլար, ապա երկրորդ եռամսյակում, մեղմ ասած, մտահոգիչ ցուցանիշ է։ Ուղղակի ներդրումների ստացումները այս տարվա երկրորդ եռամսյակում կազմել են 75.6 մլն դոլար՝ 2017 թվականի երկրորդ եռամսյակի 133.9 մլն դոլարի դիմաց։ Նվազումը՝ 58.3 մլն դոլար կամ 43.5%:


Ընդ որում, եթե դիտարկում ենք ըստ երկրների, ապա պարզվում է, որ այս նվազումը մեծամասամբ պայմանավորված է Ամուլսարի ծրագրի փաստացի դադարեցմամբ։ Ջերսիից կատարված համախառն ներդրումների ծավալը 2018 թվականի մարտի վերջին և հունիսի վերջին նույնն է՝ 138.7 մլրդ դրամ, ինչը նշանակում է, որ երկրորդ եռամսյակի ընթացքում ներդրումներ չեն իրականացվել։

President of Artsakh holds meeting with Armenia’s healthcare minister

Category
Artsakh

President of the Republic of Artsakh Bako Sahakyan on August 24 received Armenia’s healthcare minister Arsen Torosyan.

During the meeting a number of issues relating to the cooperation of the healthcare ministries of the two Armenian states were discussed.

The meeting was also attended by Artsakh’s healthcare minister Arayik Baghryan.

Azerbaijani Press: At the crossways: CSTO or NATO?

Turan news agency, Azerbaijani Opposition Press
Aug 18 2018
At the crossways: CSTO or NATO?

[Armenian News note: the below is translated from the Russian edition of Turan]

From time to time, discussions break out within society, political elite, and the community of pundits and analysts about Azerbaijan's landmark choice of the military and political block to join to ensure the country's security and geopolitical stability to the full. To a certain extent, these discussions resemble speculations and bargaining aimed to manoeuvre between "stick and carrot", the [Russian-led] CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organisation] and Nato, as Azerbaijan is a member of the Non-Aligned Movement, which demands that its members forego joining military and political blocks. One might raise an objection, [saying] that Belarus, which is a member of the Non-Aligned Movement, is a member of the CSTO. However, this example is rather an exception from the rule. At present, people seem to have quite forgotten that not only Azerbaijan, but also Georgia (!) was a member of the CSTO.

In May 1992, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan signed in Tashkent a collective security treaty (CST). Azerbaijan signed the treaty on 24 September 1993. Georgia signed it on 9 September 1993 and Belarus signed it on 31 December 1993. The treaty came into force on 20 April 1994 and it was meant to last for five years, allowing extension. On 2 April 1999, presidents of Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, and Tajikistan signed a protocol on prolonging the time of operation of the treaty for the following 5-year period. However, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Uzbekistan refused to prolong the treaty.

Pros and cons of joining a military block

At different times, supporters and opponents of one or the other block put forward numerous arguments for and against. In 2008, it was said that Azerbaijani armaments were Soviet-designed and that joining the CSTO, it would be possible to make the same procurements at lower prices; apart from this, Russia's policy regarding [Azerbaijan's breakaway Nagorno-]Karabakh was expected to change, but Armenia and Azerbaijan could not officially be at war; in the case of a military conflict, Armenia could not count on the CSTO's help; and lastly, regional security would increase. It should be taken into consideration that Armenia, which is intertwined with Russia, enjoys the benefits of cooperation with Nato and the EU. An emphasis was also placed on Azerbaijan's closeness to Russia in economic and political terms. It was emphasised that joining the CSTO was not going to create any problems, as Russia wanted to have an ally of the kind in the Caucasus to prevent Nato expansion in the region. Forecasts were made that joining the CSTO, we would tie Armenia's hands, beginning a new stage of talks from better positions. This is why this choice is better than today's military neutrality.

The arguments presented by those opposed to the CSTO are as follows: Sooner or later, Azerbaijan will switch to more sophisticated Western armaments, striving to achieve Nato standards; Russia's pro-Armenian policy will become neutral at the best and Baku will finally lose the opportunity to regain occupied territories under military duress; if necessary, the CSTO (to be read as Russia) might demand that military bases be set up on Azerbaijan's territory. (The constitution of the Republic of Azerbaijan says that military bases of foreign countries cannot be stationed on the territory of Azerbaijan.) Joining the CSTO, Azerbaijan will lose the opportunity to pursue the policy of manoeuvring between the West and the Russian Federation.

Is it right to compare Nato with its history and traditions with a marginalised organisation such as the CSTO, which effectively has no development prospects?! Joining the CSTO, Azerbaijan will not only change the vector of development and [upset] the existing balance, but it will also face the danger of revision of a number of ongoing and planned transport, communications, and energy projects related with the West. Therefore, even if Azerbaijan takes a fancy for the CSTO, it will not be able to join it.

Cooling in relations with Turkey, which is the only ally, will become yet another danger posed.

Russia's position regarding Karabakh will change only after it realises that it has completely hooked Azerbaijan, which will replace Armenia as its foothold in the South Caucasus.

Nevertheless, given the experience of Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine, Azerbaijan's joining Nato is suicidal. Azerbaijan needs to set up its own alliance: Turkey-Azerbaijan-Israel.

Azerbaijan is facing no danger as long as it steers clear of any military blocks. Therefore, it is foolish to forgo the position.

Other opinions were also voiced. More often than not, they were unexpected. Until the Karabakh conflict is settled, Azerbaijan should not join Nato or the CSTO. Becoming a member of a military block, Baku will automatically recognise the military block's control over its military forces. It is clear that providing security guarantees, leading superpowers of the military block demand that members of the block coordinate their military and foreign polices with it in exchange.

By and large, Iran and Russia have no particular interest in Azerbaijan proper. What they need is the Moscow-Baku-Tehran road. The West will feel anger, failing to realise that we cannot speak with Russia or Iran from the position of strength and threats of blockades. If the West needs this, let it settle the problem by itself. We should remember the fate [former Georgian President Mikheil] Saakashvili faced. In the case of Azerbaijan, the more global communications run across the country, the more convenient the blackmailer's position becomes. It is possible to turn Naxcivan into a free economic zone for trade between Georgia and Russia, Iran and the West, and Turkey and Armenia under Baku's control.

We should listen to the advice from neighbouring Georgia: "I am from Georgia and I have no right to participate in the opinion poll, but let me express my opinion:

"Azerbaijan is living a peaceful life, because it pursues a neutral policy. As for Georgia, it is rushing to the West and Nato. Azerbaijan is helping us (gas, political support) and there is enough [of both]. If you now try to infract neutrality, trying to join Nato, provocations will begin in Karabakh [to be followed by] artillery attacks on Azerbaijani settlements; planes cruising out of nowhere will bomb your towns; Lezgians will show a desire to reunite with their historic motherland [in Russia's North Caucasus]; the Talysh (or someone else) will begin to stir; the Armenian Army will mount an attack, demanding that "Bakurakert [Baku]" be returned, and Russia will carry out a 'peacekeeping' mission.

"If you try to join the CSTO, you will see orange roses in Baku. Therefore, enjoy your peaceful life by now. We will join Nato and then your turn will come. It will be easier for you to join Nato. We will help you," [the person said].

Let us continue [considering] the arguments of those opposed to the CSTO. If Azerbaijan joins the CSTO, Russia may very well return us five districts (without Lacin and Kalbacar and without Nagorno-Karabakh, of course) to award the choice and improve its own image. It may help us to sign with Armenia a peace agreement or an interim peace agreement, to be more precise. In exchange, we will lose Karabakh forever; we will have to sell all gas pipelines to Russia and increase oil transportation along the whole northern route. In a word, we will depend on Russia's whims not only politically, but also economically.

If we decide on Nato and the West, at the initial stage, we will quite possibly experience pressure on Russia's part; we might face deportation of our fellow-countrymen from Russia; there might be provocations in the regions adjacent to the Armenian border and local battles in Karabakh, which will possibly turn into a war. Russia might increase the issuance of Russian passports (the process has already begun) in the north of our country, repeating the Georgian scenario at any time. However, if our leadership and the whole nation manage to withstand Russia's pressure, we will afterwards return our territories, becoming stronger with a better trained army and becoming the West's powerful lever for bringing Armenia over to the Western course to finally oust Russia from our region. We will receive economic benefits, support, investments, and practical help in the reforms to be carried out.

Objections: The danger of the situation is that we can no longer be a neutral country, pursuing a "balanced" policy. The main obstacle to our authorities when [thinking whether] to decide on the West is that pro-Western course requires reforms. And this is what [they find] unacceptable! Therefore, I fear that our "ship" will head to the North…

Baku joined the Non-Aligned Movement back in 2011. Correspondingly, talk about membership of the CSTO is doubtful. Baku has always been consistent in avoiding participation in any military and political alliances. So far, no military alliance has effectively been formed between Azerbaijan and the "elder brother" – Turkey. What is the point of joining the CSTO for Azerbaijan, which is rich in oil, has a lot of money and is developing close military and technical cooperation with Israel, Pakistan, and Turkey?

When relations with the West deteriorate, populist statements by official persons and MPs are on the increase: "To settle the Karabakh conflict, Azerbaijan needs to normalise relations with Russia. The West and Nato anyway show no support for Azerbaijan in the issue (MP Qudrat Hasanquliyev, 26 November 2009) Azerbaijan can join the CSTO, stationing Russian military bases in exchange for the return of Nagorno Karabakh".

Another MP, Aydin Mirzazada, believes that official Baku can join the CSTO only under one condition: "The CSTO should condemn Armenia's expansionist policy against Azerbaijan. It should demand that Armenia withdraw all troops from Azerbaijan's occupied territories. Afterwards, Azerbaijan will be able to cooperate with the organisation in different directions. I do not think that Azerbaijan should necessarily join some block, taking part in implementing its strategy. However, along with this, it is now possible to cooperate with the CSTO in a number of spheres. However, as long as Armenia is a full-fledged member of the organisation and the organisation has not made an assessment of Armenia's expansionist policy, cooperation with the CSTO is ruled out in any sphere."

The condition, which was laid down, once again implies for Russia that taking Azerbaijan's side in the Karabakh conflict, Russia will gain a lot in exchange.

Presidential advisor Ali Hasanov: "Azerbaijan would have joined the CSTO long ago, had there been…

Meanwhile, on 14 April 2017, a representative of Armenia, Yuri Khachaturov, became a new secretary general of the CSTO.

A short while ago, statements about the need in Azerbaijan's joining the CSTO to settle the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict were again made in the Milli Maclis [Parliament]…