Turkish Press: Walls Turkey erects on its east means a shift toward Europe

Hurriyet Daily News, Turkey
Jan 15 2018

By building walls on its eastern borders, Turkey has implicated it is turning its face to the West. These walls are also NATO walls, according to prominent academic Deniz Ülke Arıboğan, who analyzes the meaning of more than 60 walls between states in the post-Cold War era in her new book ‘Wall’

When you build a wall you consider the other side of the wall as the ‘other,’ and the ‘other’ does not have a positive connotation, Arıboğan says, adding that a wall also creates a sense of belonging.

Turkey is turning its face toward the West similar to what it did in the past, and the country considers itself belonging to the West by building walls against the East, leading academic Arıboğan has said.

“These walls are also NATO walls and European walls,” she noted, underlining a shift from a neo-Ottoman foreign policy to a defensive one.

Why did you name your book “Wall?”

When I use the concept of wall I try to reflect the new world spirit. When the Berlin Wall collapsed, it opened a new era. We thought there would be a world without borders, symbolizing liberalization, democratization and globalization.

The day the Berlin Wall collapsed there were only a dozen of walls in the world, but at this moment there are at least 65 countries building very thick walls on their borders. The wall has lots of meanings. When you build a wall you consider the other side of the wall as the “other.” And the “other” does not have a positive connotation.

When you build a wall it also creates a sense of belonging; you are declaring your territory. This is ownership. If there is a threat to your territorial integrity, you create a wall and say: “This territory is mine.”

Why do you have separate chapters on China and Russia?

The countries that are building walls are not Eastern countries, they are Western countries.

The world’s biggest communist party is building the world’s biggest capitalist market and is claiming that walls should be teared down. China has become the engine of the global economy, while U.S. President Donald Trump is building a wall on the Mexican border.

 Russia is in the midst of a military expansion, trying to reach the warm waters of the world. Russia is expanding militarily and China economically. The walls are against the expansionists.

In the Western world, some create walls against refugees, some against terrorists, some against globalization and some against Russia. But the main thing we are creating is a world with walls leading to an interstate system.

Let’s talk about the walls of Turkey

There is an important shift. Turkey was aspiring to play a leadership role in the former Ottoman territories. There was talk about neo-ottoman ideology and zero problems with our neighbors. We were clearing land mines along the Syrian border, opening the borders and lifting travel visas. We believed that all people living in the former Ottoman lands would be united under one Turkish leadership. But now we are building walls. We have completely cut the Turkish and Syrian territories from each other. A few years ago, our president said the Syrian issue was our domestic problem.

Now we are saying these are external issues. With walls against Syria, Iraq, Iran and Armenia, Turkey is closing its borders to the East and the Southeast.

Is the government aware of the consequence the way you define it?

They have to be. It is not a reactional policy. After former Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu’s resignation, there was a shift in foreign policy. Although public opinion is on the other direction, I think Turkey is making a U-turn toward the West, turning its face to the West similar to the republican foreign policy. Turkey says: “These are the others, and I belong to Europe.” These walls are also NATO walls and European walls.

Why do we build walls on the borders with Armenia and Iran, with which we have good relations? Turkey is declaring its location.

It also symbolizes its territorial integrity; it hardens its borders by saying: “You cannot divide my country.” It draws a line between its own Kurdish issue and the other. The border also symbolizes the belonging. At some point we were so close with northern Iraq, but now there is a wall. Why? Because it has reached a point that it can no longer control. It [the government] says: “At least let me have consolidation within.”

Drawing a line could consolidate the will of the Kurds on the other side to have their own state, whereas there were those like former President Turgut Özal who favored an intense interdependence to fend off the Kurds’ ambition for statehood.

But let’s not forget that expansionist states are against walls. They have strong self-confidence. But once you become defensive, you start building walls. In a world based on geopolitics of fear, Turkey is taking up an introvert policy to protect its inside, and in the meantime it wants the centers in Iraq and Syria to get stronger.

That’s the new mentality in the relations we are reestablishing. We were the first ones to show reaction to the independence referendum in northern Iraq. The whole world gave a similar reaction, which would not have been the same five years ago. Those who applauded the Arab Spring now do not want anyone to take to the streets.

The end of the Arab Spring means the end of these kinds of tendencies.

Don’t you think such policy will fasten the establishment of Kurdish states outside Turkey’s borders?

Not really. Building a wall not only makes those the “other,” but also means it [Turkey] will intervene. There will be relations from state to state. In globalization, state establishments were pushed aside, there were communications between communities. Now states are gaining prominence. In fact we are not talking about strong countries, but strong leaders, like Russian President Vladimir Putin and German Chancellor Angela Merkel. Ethnic groups, sects and interest groups no longer have their former influence.

In this case, how do you think Turkey’s Kurdish issue will evolve?

These kinds of movements weaken when they do not get strong international support. We have seen that during the war in Syria, the Kurdish issue was supported. But Kurds were strengthened as long as it was fighting against a strong Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL). If you think they will get stronger as ISIL loses power, you are wrong. The weaker ISIL gets, the less need there is for the Kurds; and then the melting will start. The crisis in Syria goes beyond the Kurdish issue; it has become a U.S.-Russia matter.

Domestically, I do not think the process will be done like those in the past, i.e. in the form of democratization or a peace process. Turkey is governed by a nationalist front and it is impossible to build a peace process that the public as a whole will approach positively.

Globalization has brought sub-identities to the surface, the new order tells us to forget our sub-identities and stick to our upper-identities as citizens. I do not believe the Kurdish movement will be nourished into a strong momentum as it has in the past. They will find their places among major political parties.

You claim Turkey is building a wall against Russia, signaling that it belongs to the West. Looking at Turkish-Russian relations, however, that might not appear as such to the Western world.

Relations with Russia are there to balance relations with the West. I think Turkey has been humiliated by the West and that current populist policies will create serious problems for Turks and Muslims living there. If Turkey fails to strike the balance with Russia, it cannot protect it citizens there either. This is a silent scream from Turkey, which is saying: “Look I am drawing my lines, don’t exclude me.” The day Turkey will enter an alliance with Russia, the loss of the West will not be limited to Turkey, but it will encapsulate the whole Middle East. Americans will become unable to fly a single plane. Turkey is the holder of the balance; it will have relations with both Russia and Iran while remaining a part of the West.

But the West says: “We don’t have a place in our club for a Turkey that will slide into authoritarianism.”

Look at the state in which their club is. How is it in Hungary or Poland? How is the rise of the far-right in Germany or Holland? I think Europe is under the threat of fascism and totalitarianism. The rise of populism is killing the very ideal of the European identity based on democracy and freedom.

WHO IS DENİZ ÜLKE ARIBOĞAN?

Born in 1965, Professor Deniz Ülke Arıboğan received her undergraduate degree in international relations from the Faculty of Political Sciences at Ankara University.

She studied international security and terrorism at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland. Arıboğan is the author of eight books, including “Map of the Future” and “From the End of History to the End of Peace.”

Arıboğan lectured in Istanbul University, Bilgi University and military academies. In 2007, she became the rector at Bahçeşehir University and served until 2010.

She then became a member of the Board of Trustees at Istanbul Bilgi University.

A member of the World Academy of Arts and Sciences, she is currently a senior fellow at the University of Oxford CRIC (Centre for the Resolution of Intractable Conflict).

She is also a member of the International Dialogue Initiative (IDI), which aims to facilitate dialogue between various large groups, states and cultures for the purpose of learning about differences in perspective.

Music: Saved by a Violin

China Daily
Saturday
 
 
Saved by a Violin
 
by Chen Nan
 
 
 Ara Malikian plays the violin around the globe, and will make his debut in China with a recital in Beijing on Jan 21. Photos provided to China Daily
Between 1915 and 1918, many Christian Armenians were killed but one young man survived thanks to a violin. He didn't know how to use it, but thanks to that instrument, which was given by a friend, he could pretend to be part of an ensemble that was going on tour and therefore he escaped to Lebanon.
 
Ara Malikian, a musician of Armenian descent, reveals how the instrument has played a key role in his family's history over the generations
 
Between 1915 and 1918, many Christian Armenians were killed but one young man survived thanks to a violin. He didn't know how to use it, but thanks to that instrument, which was given by a friend, he could pretend to be part of an ensemble that was going on tour and therefore he escaped to Lebanon.
 
More than a century later, the young man's grandson, Ara Malikian, plays the violin around the globe and will make his debut in China with a recital in Beijing on Jan 21.
 
"Music and the violin mean a lot to our family. Music was our way of surviving. I discovered the story of violin only 10 years ago. My father told me the story and my dream was to pay a tribute to this violin to music and to my family," says the violinist, Malikian, 49, ahead of his trip.
 
Besides the capital, the violinist will perform in Xi'an, Shaanxi province, Shanghai and Chengdu, Sichuan province.
 
The tour in China is a part of Malikian's tour, The Incredible Tour of Violin, which he began a year ago.
 
He says that the audiences can expect the show to be a musical journey "from Bach, Mozart and Paganini to Jimmy Hendrix, Radiohead and David Bowie" as well as many his compositions.
 
"I have always been interested in trying out music of different styles and different cultures, and trying to adapt them for violin with my own way and personality," says Malikian.
 
Malikian, who was born in Beirut, the capital of Lebanon, started playing the violin at 5 under the guidance of his violinist father.
 
His talent was quickly recognized as he first performed publicly at 12. At 14, with the help of German orchestra director Hans Herbert-Joris, Malikian was offered a scholarship by German government to study at Hanover University of Music, Drama and Media, making him the youngest student at the prestigious school. Later, he continued his studies at the Guildhall School of Music & Drama in London.
 
Malikian, along with his family, was forced to leave Lebanon in the 1970s for Europe because of the Lebanese civil war.
 
The violinist, who now lives in Madrid, attributes his original and innovative sound to his two sisters, who both loved rock music and inspired him to try out new music styles from a young age. His sisters played piano from childhood but had to give up due to the war.
 
In 2015, he released his last album, 15, a concert recorded at the Royal Theater of Madrid to celebrate his 15 years living in Spain.
 
"Spain inspired me a lot, both personally and professionally. In Spain, I discovered flamenco music and met many great Latin American musicians. I also had the chance to experience in Spain a wide range of music – from classical symphonic orchestral music up to jazz rock and world music," he says.
 
Now, with more than 20 albums released, Malikian performs more than 450 concerts in 40 countries around the world every year.
 
In September 2015, he performed with the State Youth Orchestra of Armenia, under the baton of maestro Sergey Smbatyan in Madrid.
 
Speaking about Malikian, Smbatyan says: "We are always looking for Armenians in other nations but we forget that we have real Armenian heroes that affect the formation of the image of Armenia abroad."
 
Besides his music, Malikian participates in projects, which aim to improve the life of the most disadvantaged people, especially when it comes to kids.
 
In 2016, Malikian toured refugee camps and played for Syrian children.
 
With many of the children hearing the violin for the first time, Malikian shares with the children how the violin helped him when he was a refugee like them.
 

If you go

Ara Malikian

7:30 pm, Jan 21. Theater of Beijing Exhibition Hall, 135 Xizhimenwai Dajie, Xicheng district, Beijing. 400-610-3721

 

Sports: Armenia leading skier will not take part in 2018 Winter Olympics

News.am, Armenia
Jan 14 2018
By Lusine Shahbazyan
Armenia’s leading skier, Sergey Mikayelyan, will not be able to compete at the forthcoming 2018 Winter Olympics to be held in Pyeongchang, South Korea; but his younger brother, Mikayel, will take his place at this event.
The Sochi, Russia, 2014 Winter Olympics participant told about the aforesaid to NEWS.am Sport.
“I already had qualified for the Olympics, but I sustained a knee injury during the last trainings, and I didn’t compete in some competitions, as a result of which I lost my position on the top 300 list; I will not participate in the [2018 Winter] Olympic Games,” Sergey Mikayelyan said. “[But] I’m happy that the participation of my brother, Mikayel Mikayelyan, has already been confirmed. He also has enough points that meet Olympic qualification.”
And Gagik Sargsyan, Secretary General of the Armenian Ski Federation, informed that Armenia will have one skier each at the men’s and the women’s competitions in Pyeongchang.

Sports: Mourinho: Mkhitaryan is very good player, he will play against Stoke City

News.am, Armenia
Jan 14 2018
Manchester United manager José Mourinho spoke about the future of this English football club’s midfielder Henrikh Mkhitaryan, who also captains the Armenian national squad.
“My approach to players is that every player has a price,” sky sports quoted the Portuguese specialist as saying. “It doesn't matter who he is. It doesn’t matter the level. It doesn’t matter the prestige, the status. I think every player has a price.
“And I am not the kind of blind manager…blind in the sense of, this player is untouchable, can never be sold. I think every player has a price.
“So when the transfer window is open, it’s also open for any club that is interested in our players. Then it’s up to us to make the decision: yes or no.
“It’s up to us to decide what we think is the right price. But Mkhitaryan played the last match in the [English] FA Cup and probably will play the next one [against Stoke City]. He’s a little bit the same in relation to other players that are involved in this gossip of the transfer market.
“He is our player and a very good player. So Saturday [he is] training, then Sunday [he is] selected and Monday [he will] play.”
Mourinho had recently announced that Man United will try to sell Henrikh Mkhitaryan in winter; the Red Devils assess his transfer value at £35 million.
The next match of United, which held a training camp in Dubai, is on Monday, January 15, as they will host Stoke City in their English Premier League fixture.

Sports: Arsenal urged to sign Manchester United outcast Henrikh Mkhitaryan

International Business Times UK
Jan 14 2018


Arsenal urged to sign Manchester United outcast Henrikh Mkhitaryan

  • By Karthick Arvinth

Arsenal should sign Henrikh Mkhitaryan from Manchester United if they end up losing Alexis Sanchez and Mesut Ozil, former Gunners midfielder Paul Merson has said.

Both Ozil and Sanchez are in the final six months of their respective contracts at the Emirates Stadium, with the former linked with United and the latter with United, Manchester City and Chelsea.

Merson expressed fears that Arsenal would be left without a marquee player if Ozil and Sanchez both end up leaving and urged the club to launch a move for Mkhitaryan, who has fallen out of favour with Red Devils manager Jose Mourinho.

The Armenia international has only started two of United's last 15 matches, with Mourinho suggesting that he is open to letting the midfielder move on from the club before the January transfer window closes.

"I think selling Sanchez to United and getting Mkhitaryan in return would work," Merson told Sky Sports.

"I honestly believe Mkhitaryan is one of the best players in the Premier League, his confidence is just shot at United.

"If Arsenal could get him playing like he was at Borussia Dortmund they would have one of the best players in the league. That would represent a good deal."

Mkhitaryan, 28, has also been linked with moves to Inter Milan and former club Borussia Dortmund.

Mourinho said the playmaker will likely start against Stoke on 15 January, but reiterated that "every player has a price".

"Doesn't matter who he is, doesn't matter the level, doesn't matter the prestige, the status, I think every player has a price," the United manager was reported as saying by Manchester Evening News.

"I'm not the kind of blind managers, blind in the sense of this player is untouchable, this player we can never sell, I think every player has a price.

"So when the transfer window is open is also open for any club that is interested in our players, then it's up to us to make the decision yes or no, it's up to us to decide what we think is the right price."

United signed Mkhitaryan from Dortmund for £26.3m in July 2016.

Arthur Sakunc: I rise the issue and announce that there are other factors, putting Armen’s and Smbat’s lives in danger

It is already known that Armen Bilyan, a member of Sasna Tsrer, stopped the hunger strike. He is replaced to the “Hospital for Convicts” penitentiary after 25 days’ hunge strike. Smbat Barseghyan still continues the hunger strike. Their demand is unchangeable: they want to be replaced from “Nubarashen” penitentiary to “Armavir” penitentiary.

Advocate Arthur Sakunc suggests understanding the underlying theme of Armen Bilyan’s and Smbat Barseghyan’s announcement. There are at least 800 detainees in the “Nubarashen” penitentiary, but why do only they complain about the conditions?

“Aren’t those people able to get used to the conditions like others do? The reason is quite different. I rise the issue and announce that there are other factors, putting Armen’s and Smbat’s lives in danger, about which they do not dare to speak up. So, I do it for them,” said Arthur Sakunc.

 

Nina Karapetyanc mentioned another case when some of the members of the”Sasna Tsrer” group had demanded the same, and their demand had been accepted without any difficulties.

Armen Bilyan’s attorney, Armine Fanyan, noted that the Penitentiary Department gave contradicting answers to her and the court. “In a response addressed to me, it was stated that the body conducting the criminal proceedings needed permission, and in a letter addressed to the court it was said that there was no need to transfer.”

The attorney said that Armen Bilyan’s condition was extremely heavy, though he had stopped the hunger strike.

Prelate’s New Year And Christmas Dinner Marked By Tradition And New Successes

Plaques of Appreciation And Gratitude Presented To Anahid Baghdadlian-Ohanesian, Kathy Bedrosian, Abdulian, Shirvanian, and Baghdassarian Families

Baghdassarian And Melkonian Families To Host 2019 And 2020 Christmas Dinner Respectively

MONTEBELLO—On Saturday, January 6, 550 members of the Western Prelacy family and community, dignitaries, sponsors, and friends gathered at Holy Cross Cathedral’s “Baghramian” Hall in Montebello for the Prelate’s annual and traditional New Year and Christmas Dinner. The event was held under the auspices of Western Prelate Archbishop Moushegh Mardirossian and was organized by the Prelacy Ladies Auxiliary in conjunction with the Christmas Dinner Committee. This year’s host was Anahid Baghdadlian-Ohanesian.

Among the guests in attendance were Armenian Revolutionary Federation Bureau member Dr. Viken Yacoubian, Catholicosate Central Executive member Gaidzag Zetlian, Honorary Consul of Armenia in Fresno Berj Apkarian, Honorary Consul of Armenia in Las Vegas Adroushan Armenian, California State Senator Anthony Portantino, ARF-WR Central Committee Chair Daron Der Khachadourian, Political Chair Avedik Izmirlian and members, Glendale City Council member Ara Najarian, Montebello City Council member Jack Hadjinian, clergy, Religious and Executive Councils, Delegates and parishes’ Board of Trustees members, schools’ principals and members of CASPS, representatives of community organizations including the ANCA-WR, Hamazkayin, Homenetmen, ARS, Dro Gomideh, Asbarez, Armenian-American Museum, Glendale Memorial, Armenian-American Medical Society, Glendale Memorial Hospital, Forest Lawn, and more, sponsors and supporters.

The Prelacy clergy hold candlelight prayer upon entering the hall

The program officially began with welcoming remarks by Archpriest Fr. Vazken Atmajian, who served as Master of Ceremonies. Citing from the hymn “Great and Marvelous Mystery,” on behalf of her colleagues on the Ladies Auxiliary Vania Babikian wished all a blessed year. Very Rev. Fr. Torkom Donoyan, Vicar General, spoke on the good tidings of Christ’s birth as a time of exaltation for all, and wished for the Christmas spirit and message of peace and harmony to pervade our individual and collective lives.

Next, with the hall illuminated by candlelight, the Prelate and clergy made their entrance into the hall, candles in hand, while singing Christmas hymns, and echoed the good tidings of the Nativity and Theophany of our Lord. Fr. Torkom read the Gospel passage of Christ’s birth, after which the “tatakh” ceremony took place and the blessing of tables by the Prelate.

Guests viewed the video message of His Holiness Catholicos Aram I, which focused on the importance of renewal. Our Pontiff stated that the message of Christmas itself is renewal and that the very purpose of the incarnation of the Son of God in Jesus of Nazareth was the renewal of humanity and the whole of creation. His Holiness emphasized that renewal is not a mere change, rather a continuous process embracing human life in all its aspects, dimensions, spheres, and manifestations; it is turning to God and integrating the Gospel’s values to our individual and community life. His Holiness stressed his expectation that all Prelacies and communities take renewal seriously as a top priority and open our communities to new horizons and greater achievements.

The capacity crowd at the Prelate Christmas Dinner

On behalf of the Executive Council, Chairman Vahe Hovagumian conveyed New Year and Christmas well wishes to all, and noting that this year marks the end of his second term as Chairman, thanked his colleagues for their collaboration and once again congratulated the Prelate on the milestone anniversaries he marked a few months back, wishing him continued successes.

During dinner, guests enjoyed traditional and festive music by the Greg Hosharian Quintet (Greg Hosharian – Piano, Salpy Kerkonian – Flute, Ayline Amirayan – Vocal, Angela Amirian – Violin, and George Bilezikjian – Dhol), Deacon Yervant Keshishian, accompanied on the piano by his wife Maria, and Hovhannes Balian, as well as dances by the Hamazkayin “Ani” Dance Group, led by artistic directors Yeghia Hasholian and Suzy Barseghian-Tarpinian.

The closing message was delivered by the Prelate. His Eminence greeted all and gave thanks to God for the blessing of collectively welcoming a new year, celebrating the Birth and Theophany of our Lord Jesus Christ in a warm, festive, and serene atmosphere, and together embarking on a new year of endeavors with new hopes and aspirations for the prosperity of our church, nation, and homeland. The Prelate reflected on the timeless Christmas message of love, humility, goodwill, and harmony, and on the humble circumstances of Christ’s birth and His earthly ministry, which he stated is a reminder and invitation to live in His ideal example, humbly and with a servant’s heart, to pursue not earthly and fleeting treasures but spiritual and heavenly treasures, to dedicate ourselves to His glory and for the collective good of mankind, and to commit ourselves to the spirit of love, peace, and goodwill toward man all the days of the year.

The Prelate expressed gratitude to His Holiness Catholicos Aram I for his paternal wisdom and guidance, and expressed appreciation to all the guests in attendance for their enduring support and encouragement. He extended special thanks to the evening’s host, Anahid Baghdadlian-Ohanesian, who, though she could not attend, once again graciously and generously hosted the dinner and continued the legacy of her late husband Gaizag. He expressed his deepest appreciation to Kathy Bedrosian for her longstanding support and her most recent and generous donation of $100,000 toward the establishment of a special fund within the Prelacy, and invited her to the stage to receive a plaque of gratitude. His Eminence thanked all the sponsors and donors for their vital moral and financial support. He recognized the efforts of the Prelacy Ladies Auxiliary, the Christmas Dinner Committee, as well as the Prelacy staff.

Next, the Prelate paid tribute to the loved ones lost in the past year: Dr. Misak Abdulian, a faithful Christian, beloved family man, and respected physician, whose wife Hourig served and contributed to our Prelacy for many years as a member of our Ladies Auxiliary; benefactress and community activist Mina Shirvanian, whose altruistic benevolence brought great advancements to our national life; and Hacop Baghdassarian, a pillar of our community, philanthropist, and Good Samaritan whose scope of influence reached far and wide. His Eminence, joined by Executive Council Chairman Vahe Hovaguimian and Vice-Chair Garo Eshgian, one by one invited Hourig Abdulian and children Dr. Michael and Mari, Mina Shirvanian’s daughter Alice Petrossian and grandson Chris, and Hilda Baghdassarian and children Peter and Gevik to receive plaques of gratitude for the contributions of their loved ones.

Following the awarding of plaques, the Prelate commended Peter and Gevik Beghdassarian’s commitment to carrying on the legacy of their father Hacop Baghdassarian, a commitment which they had expressed to the Prelate at the passing of their father. Accordingly, His Eminence joyfully announced that Peter and Gevik Baghdassarian pledged to host the 2019 Christmas Dinner with a $100,000 donation as a continuation of their father’s legacy. The Prelate also commended and Mr. & Mrs. Varant and Hoori Melkonian for their enduring benevolence and their wish to host the following year’s dinner. However, since the Baghdassarian family had already committed to hosting the 2019 Christmas Dinner, His Eminence announced that the Melkonian family will be hosting the 2020 Christmas Dinner.

The Prelate continued his message, focusing on the endeavors of the coming year which will be marked by a number of milestone anniversaries including the 100th anniversary of the first Republic of Armenia, the 60th anniversary of the North American Prelacy, the 45th anniversary of our Western Prelacy, the centennial of Homenetmen, and the 90th anniversary of Hamazkayin, among others. These milestones, as with all of our achievements and successes, are owing to collective and united efforts, and thus are a source of collective pride, joy, and celebration as well as an impetus to continue our service with added drive and devotion toward new and greater accomplishments, he stressed. His Eminence reflected on the great strides the Prelacy has made in the past forty-five years, the growth in the number of churches and schools and the overall expansion of endeavors and scope, all thanks to collective work and efforts. He gave thanks for the addition of new and young energy to assist in the continuation and expansion of our mission, the addition of Very Rev Fr. Torkom Donoyan as Vicar General as well as Rev. Fr. Movses Shannakian, and for the collaboration and cooperation of community-wide organizations. “Inspired and impelled by the successes of the past, let us now look to the future and to reaching new and even greater heights. The Year of Renewal is officially over, but renewal never ends. Renewal and revitalization is and must be an ongoing process so that we can continue to progress not just in the coming year but for years to come. Thus, I urge our clergy, councils, parishes, schools, and community organizations to continue to serve hand in hand and heart to heart, as members of one loving family, with renewed drive and spirits, for the collective good of our church and nation,” stressed the Prelate, and once again wished all a blessed New Year and a Merry Christmas, praying for the Light of Christ to brighten our days with His love, joy, and peace, and embolden us to serve with unity, harmony, and goodwill.

The celebration closed with Cilicia and the Pontifical anthem.

Greece and Turkey Playing Nice?

Garen Yegparian

BY GAREN YEGPARIAN

So, a Turk walks into a bar…

Oh wait, I’m not telling a joke. Rather, I’m writing an article. But that’s difficult to remember when the Turk in question is Erdoğan and the “bar” is Greece.

A friend recently sent me a BBC news item reporting on an historic visit by a Turkish president to Greece, the first in 65 years. You won’t be surprised to learn that Erdoğan played the boorish guest almost as soon as he arrived. Fortunately, he was put in his place. Too bad he wasn’t shown the door right back out of the “bar”!

On the first day of his visit, Erdoğan was whining about insufficient “support … in terms of investments” for and “discrimination” against Turks in Greece. He also asserted that some points of the Treaty of Lausanne lacked clarity.

The temerity and unmitigated shameless brazenness of this latter day wanna-be Sultan is more breathtaking then a kick in the gut. Supposedly, Athens appointed a mufti (leader, Islamic expert) for the Turks living in the country rather than allowing them to choose their own. I don’t know what the rules are regarding the filling of this position, but for the purposes of this discussion, they are not relevant.

Aside from the fact that this probably only means the guy Erdoğan wanted didn’t get the job, the hypocrisy manifested is astounding. Does Erdoğan have multiple personalities? Is one of those unaware that the other is jerking around Turkey’s Armenian community around, preventing the election of a new Patriarch of Bolis? And, in this case, there are well established rules dating back to the adoption of the constitution governing such procedures back in 1863.

The discrimination complaint is equally hypocritical. I suppose there’s yet another Erdoğan personality in charge of jailing and murdering Kurds, one more for mistreating Alevis, a fifth for discriminating against Jews…

The funniest Erdoğan “plaint” is the one about the lack of clarity in the Treaty of Lausanne. He wants to rejigger it to make it even more favorable to Turkey, I suppose. Perhaps we, along with other signatories, should propose a deal, the mother of all deals (to make President Trump happy). We’ll agree to reopen the Lausanne Treaty if Turkey first accepts and re-signs the Treaty of Sèvres (I would bet the Greeks would jump at the opportunity to sign, which they refused to do at the time, since they would do much better territorially). Then, it would only make sense to rework Lausanne. How about it, Mr. Erdoğan? Let’s trade treaties.

Luckily, Greek President Prokopis Pavlopoulos, who is also one of Greece’s foremost law experts, shut down his visiting counterpart’s absurd proposal, saying: “This treaty, to us, is not negotiable, this treaty does not have any gaps, does not need a review nor an update. This treaty is valid as it is.”

Clearly, despite the view of analysts that Erdoğan and Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras share a warm relationship, there is no spillover of “warmth” into the overall relationship between the two countries. Nor, rightly, should there be, for so long as Turkey continues to violate Greek air and sea space, oppress the few thousand Greeks remaining in Turkey, continuing its occupation of Cyprus, and generally being a bad neighbor and destabilizing force in the region.

Perhaps we Armenians must take it upon ourselves to remind Greece that making nice with Turkey under these circumstances will only lead to more losses. Should we start a campaign to write letters to Greek ambassadors worldwide? Maybe by taking them to a bar…

HRW Says There is Little Protection, Aid for Domestic Violence Survivors

A protest in Armenia against domestic violence

YEREVAN–The lives and well-being of women and children in Armenia who have survived domestic violence are in jeopardy because of the Armenian government’s failure to ensure their protection, Human Rights Watch said Friay. In December 2017, Armenia’s parliament passed a law on violence in the family, but women and children remain at risk until the government comprehensively changes how police respond to complaints of violence and provides accessible, quality services for survivors.

Human Rights Watch spoke with 12 survivors of severe domestic abuse in Armenia. The women said their husbands or male partners punched and kicked them, raped them, struck them with furniture and other objects, confined them in their homes, stalked them, and threatened or attempted to kill them with knives or other sharp objects. Five women said the attacks against them continued during pregnancy; three said they had miscarriages after their husbands beat them.

“Armenian authorities have failed to protect women and others from domestic violence, putting women’s and children’s health and lives in jeopardy,” said Jane Buchanan, associate Europe and Central Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “The new law is one important step, but until authorities take reports of domestic violence seriously and ensure that women and children get the legal, medical, and social help they need, the danger remains.”

Those interviewed said that when they reported abuse to police or other authorities, the authorities did nothing to prevent further violence, investigate cases, or hold the attackers accountable. In some cases, the authorities encouraged women to drop complaints and reconcile with their abusers. The authorities did not refer the women for services or assistance.

Armenia’s Coalition to Stop Violence against Women, an alliance of nongovernmental women’s rights organizations, reported that at least four women were killed by their partners or other family members in the first half of 2017, and at least 50 were killed between 2010 and 2017. The Coalition received 5,299 calls about incidents of domestic violence from January through September 2017.

In one case Human Rights Watch documented, Gayane (not her real name), 45, said that her former husband had repeatedly beat her during their eight-year marriage, stalked her after she divorced him, and frequently broke into her house to rob and attack her, most recently in November. “He grabbed me by the hair and threw me on to the sofa,” Gayane said. “He jumped on top of me and put his elbows on my throat, trying to strangle me. I bit him in the arm and he let go, but he dragged me off the sofa, threw me down on the floor, and started to kick me all over, shouting, ‘Die!’”

When Gayane ran to the police in her nightclothes, they said, “Oh, so you came and want to do something about your husband? He beat you? And so? Why did you let him in?” After receiving treatment at the hospital for a sprained wrist and numerous bruises, Gayane returned home to find her former husband asleep in her house with her two sons. Police refused to intervene.

Children witnessed abuse against their mothers, often for many years, and several women said their husbands committed violence against their children. Human Rights Watch also documented other family members, such as in-laws, abused women.

The new law requires police to urgently intervene “when there is a reasonable assumption of an immediate threat of repetition or the continuation of violence” in the family. Urgent measures include police removing the alleged attacker from the home and prohibiting them from approaching or communicating with the victim. Courts can issue six-month protection orders, with two possible three-month extensions.

Many women said they lived with their abusers for years because they had no means of escape. The country has only two domestic violence shelters, both in the capital, Yerevan, run by nongovernmental organizations, each with a capacity for five women and their children. Council of Europe standards call for at least one specialized shelter in every region, and one shelter space per 10,000 people. With a population of approximately 2.9 million, Armenia should have approximately 290 shelter spaces. The new law mandates creating government-run shelters, but does not specify the number of shelters or their capacity.

The law defines domestic violence as “a physical, sexual, psychological, or economic act of violence” between family members, including spouses in unregistered marriages. It is not clear if the law applies to couples who are not in registered or unregistered marriages.

Just before submitting the law to parliament in mid-November, the government revised the law to include “strengthening of traditional values in the family” as a key principle. Authorities also changed the title to add the concept of “restoring harmony in the family.”

The Coalition to Stop Violence against Women expressed concerns that the new law’s principle of “traditional values” could be used to reinforce obsolete and problematic gender roles and stereotypes. Activists also fear an emphasis on “restoring harmony” could be used to pressure women to remain in abusive relationships.

During a December 6 meeting, Armenia’s minister of justice, David Harutyunyan, told Human Rights Watch that the concept of “restoring harmony in the family” recognizes the government’s obligation to not only protect victims, but to provide services to the alleged abuser, such as alcohol or drug treatment. He said that these initiatives would not take priority over protection.

The new law requires authorities to investigate alleged crimes in the family even if the victim withdraws a complaint to the police. It also mandates training for police, prosecutors, judges and others in the criminal justice system on how to respond to complaints and investigate and prosecute cases.

The European Union insisted the government of Armenia pass a domestic violence law as a condition for certain budgetary support. The European Commission also called on Armenia to ratify the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence, known as the Istanbul Convention. In late December, the government approved the possible signature of the convention, but has not yet done so.

“Women in Armenia need the government to provide meaningful protection from abusive husbands and partners, not to reinforce gender stereotypes about men’s dominance or family roles that can contribute to violence in the first place,” Buchanan said.

Accounts from Domestic Violence Survivors
Human Rights Watch conducted in-depth interviews with 12 survivors of domestic violence in Armenia: 11 in December 2017 and one in May 2016. Human Rights Watch also interviewed women’s rights activists and representatives of organizations providing services to survivors of domestic violence, who described similar accounts of abuse, authorities’ response to domestic violence, and obstacles to accessing services for survivors. Everyone interviewed was informed of the purpose of the interview, its voluntary nature, and the ways the information would be used. All provided verbal informed consent. The interviews highlighted survivors’ experiences and the legal and other protection gaps that the government should address, including through the new law on family violence. Where necessary, pseudonyms have been used to protect interviewees’ identities.

“Armine” 
From the first weeks of her marriage in 2004, at age 19, Armine’s husband abused her:

After we were married just one or two weeks, he hit me in the face. When he stayed out late, and I asked him where he was, this would set off beatings. When I was seven months pregnant with our first child he beat me, including in my belly. According to the doctor, this injured the baby and he was born with a problem in his spine.

Then my husband started to drink, and it was as if I just made mistake after mistake. He would humiliate me. He would take all the sheets and blankets off the bed and demand that I remake it. He would refuse to eat what I prepared and demand I go out and get something else. I can’t even pronounce the words he would say to me to insult me. They were all the worst words.

Later, he started to use sharp objects. Sometimes he would come home late at night and I would be asleep in my bed with my sons on either side of me. He would jump on top of me and put the knife to my neck and say, “I’ll kill you!”

Armine said her husband broke her rib during one beating, and broke her arm during another:

I was sitting at the table across from him with my youngest son in my arms. My husband got angry and picked up the table and turned it over. I tried to stop the table from crashing onto me, but it broke my right arm. I went to the hospital and got a cast. When they asked at the hospital what had happened, I lied and said I fell.

Armine also said that if she tried to protect herself, her husband would break furniture, throw household objects and smash windows. On one occasion, neighbors called an ambulance, hoping the medics could remove Armine’s husband. Medical workers refused to intervene saying, “He’s not a patient for us, take him to the psychiatric hospital.” They left without calling the police or telling Armine how she could get help.

One night in 2014 after her husband threatened to kill her with a knife and hit her younger son, Armine fled the house with her two children. Her former husband stalked her relentlessly for two years:

He would come to my aunt’s house. He would appear on the street as I took the kids to school. He would swear at me, demand that we get back together. Other times he would stand in front of me on the sidewalk and not let me pass. Or he would grab me by the arm or by my purse, trying to make me go with him.

In 2015, Armine lost her job in a medical center after her then-former husband twice came to her workplace:

I worked a 24-hour shift. He came one night and was drunk. He said ‘I came to see if you are actually working or if you are doing something with some lover. I won’t let you work anywhere. I will slit your throat!’ After that the director came and told me I shouldn’t come to work anymore. He said, ‘It’s not ok for your husband to come here and sort out your family problems.’

The medical center director did not offer Armine any assistance.

She said the police failed to protect her:

After we were divorced, I called the police four or five times when my [former]husband showed up at my aunt’s house. They would come, take him away, then let him go after five minutes. One time I wrote a complaint to the police. The officer said, ‘We can’t do anything. We can’t detain him. There is no law.’ The investigator who received a complaint said that the only possibility was a court process with the outcome being a monetary fine for him. I decided it wasn’t worth it. He didn’t have the money to pay for a fine.

Armine described her ongoing anxiety and fears after more than a decade of abuse. She said, “I haven’t heard from him, and I believe he is not living in Armenia anymore, but I am still scared. I go to work early in the morning, when it is still dark out. I am extremely anxious from the time I leave home until I get to work. If I hear footsteps behind me, I am afraid it’s him.”

Taguhi 
Taguhi, 38, and her husband married in February 2014. She described frequent beatings for more than two years, including when she was pregnant in 2014. In another incident, her husband beat her and threatened her with a knife while she was holding their infant son. Taguhi frequently sought refuge at a friend’s home or with her parents, during which time her husband would threaten, stalk, and attack her. Taguhi’s husband also attacked her father and broke the window of her father’s car in 2015, she said. Although her father complained to police, they closed their investigation, saying there was a lack of evidence of a crime.

Taghuhi filed complaints with the police following many of the beatings, although several investigations were closed due to lack of evidence. In January 2016, however, a court convicted her husband of battery and torture based on a number of Taguhi’s complaints about beatings from February to April 2015. The court sentenced him to six months in prison but immediately released him on a conditional sentence. He served no prison time.

Despite his conviction, he continued to stalk her, especially at her parents’ apartment, forcing his way in, or attacking her near the building’s entrance. From February through July 2016, Taguhi filed at least eight complaints with the police. After an attack near her parents’ apartment in July 2016, Taguhi fled to the police with her mother. The police accepted her written complaint and then drove the women back to the apartment building, but refused to escort them to the door, although Taguhi told them she feared her former husband might be waiting for them.

As she and her mother approached the apartment door, Taguhi’s former husband, who had been hiding nearby, attacked the two women with an axe, killing Taguhi’s mother. Taguhi was hospitalized for six weeks, with numerous injuries, including a nearly severed shoulder, a partially severed ear, and axe wounds to her scalp, hand, arm, neck, chest, abdomen, and back. Her father, who came out of the apartment and tried to intervene, lost two fingers on his left hand. Her son, who was at home with the grandfather, watched the attack from the doorway. Taguhi’s former husband is in pretrial detention facing murder and attempted murder charges.

Taguhi herself, however, is also facing trial on battery charges for scratching her former husband’s arms and neck with her fingernails in June and early July 2016. She said that she was acting in self-defense and that her artificial fingernails could not have caused injury consistent with battery.

“Zaruhi”
“As soon as I got married, when I was 18, the nightmares started,” said Zaruhi, now 30. “He drank heavily, and so did his parents. All of them would hit me sometimes.” Zaruhi’s husband controlled her, threatening to kill her. He refused to let me go out of the house or even have coffee and socialize with the neighbors, she said. “He threatened me that if I tell anyone about the beatings he would kill me, or if I tried to leave him, he would find me and kill me. I felt like I had no choice but to stay.”

Her husband also raped her and controlled her sexually. “One night he came home drunk and wanted to have sex. I said, ‘I don’t want to, don’t touch me.’ He got very angry and yelled, ‘When I want to, you will sleep with me. Even if you don’t want to, I don’t care! If I want to, you will give it to me.’” Zaruhi said he punched her in the head, knocked her down, and kicked her in the abdomen, and then raped her. “After that, even if I didn’t want to be with him, I agreed. I stayed calm, just so that he wouldn’t beat me,” she said.

Zaruhi said that one day in 2009, her husband beat her when she was about five months pregnant with her third child. She started having vaginal bleeding and went to the hospital, where doctors told her that the fetus had died in the womb.

Despite regular abuse, Zaruhi was afraid to go to the police because of her husband’s death threats and those of her mother-in-law, who said: “If you ever think of going to the police, know that we have friends in the police, and it won’t do you any good.”

After a severe beating in August 2017, Zaruhi divorced her husband and moved in with her parents. He repeatedly came to their house, beat her and threatened to take their four children. She eventually moved and went into hiding. “I just want him to leave me alone,” she said. With the support of a local women’s rights organization, Zaruhi went to the police. She has filed a complaint regarding the beating that caused the death of her baby and has sued for alimony and child support. The investigation is ongoing.

“Astghik”
Astghik, 38, has three children. Her husband has abused her since shortly after they married in 2010. She said:

He grabs me and shakes me. He spits on me. Every day he wounds my soul. He threatens me, often with a knife, and tells my children, ‘I will kill your mother and you will end up in the orphanage.’ He forces me to have sex with him. I don’t want to. I do it with loathing. I do it just so there wouldn’t be another fight.

One time, earlier this year, he shoved a kitchen knife at me, threatening to kill me. I called the police, but when they came, they said, ‘Unless he actually hurts you, we can’t do anything.’

With the help of a lawyer at a nongovernmental organization, she filed an official complaint regarding the death threats. The investigation is ongoing. Although the two are officially divorced and Astghik is entitled to court-ordered child support, she continues to live with her abusive former husband, because he does not, and is not forced to, pay support, without which she has no income and is not able to provide shelter for herself and the children.

Hasmik
Hasmik said that her husband beat her for the first time soon after they married in 2004, and continued to do so regularly throughout their nine-year marriage, including during her pregnancies in 2006 and 2007. He punched her in the head when she was three months pregnant with their first child, who was born with a hearing disability. Hasmik believes her pregnancy was harmed by the abuse she suffered.

One day in 2013, Hasmik’s husband punched her in the face, broke a glass of water on her head, and beat her with a chair. “He had beaten me so badly that I lost consciousness,” she said. “I could not open my eyes, and when I did, I saw blood everywhere and on the wall.”

Her husband’s family refused to help her go to the hospital. Hasmik was bed-ridden for several weeks. Soon after she recovered, her husband resumed beating her.

After another beating later in 2013 that caused a severe injury to the side of her head, Hasmik ran away and spent the night outside in fear. She was two months pregnant. She went to her parents’ house and soon decided to have an abortion, not wanting to have another baby in her troubled family. While recovering at home, she fainted, and her family called an ambulance. When the medics saw her head injury, they insisted that she notify the police.

Police arrived from the town where Hasmik and her husband lived, but instead of assisting her, they urged her to go back to her husband. Hasmik refused, and with the support of a women’s rights group, moved to a shelter, filed a complaint against her husband for abuse, and petitioned for custody of her children. Hasmik’s former husband threatened her, saying he would never let her see their children again, unless she withdrew her police complaint.

Police failed to respond appropriately or prevent further threats and abuse during the investigation. During one witness confrontation, a procedural step in criminal investigations when the two parties must meet together with the investigator, Hasmik ’s husband shouted at her saying, “I will smash this table on your head!” When the investigator did not respond, Hasmik fled, and filed a complaint. At the next interrogation the investigator said to her, mockingly, “He didn’t actually hit you with the table. Why did you run out of here?”

Her former husband was later charged with torture, including causing physical and psychological suffering, of a person financially dependent on him (Criminal Code article 119). In December 2014, a court convicted him and sentenced him to 18 months in prison, but he was released from the courtroom under a national amnesty for certain crimes, and served no prison time. He did not further harm Hasmik, but in 2015 attacked his parents and police who responded. A trial on charges of using violence against police is ongoing.

Though a court awarded Hasmik custody of her then-6-year-old son in 2013, her husband’s family refused to give the child to her, and the regional division of the Justice Ministry’s enforcement service did not carry out the judgment. Her son finally moved in with her in November 2016 after national authorities intervened. Hasmik’s daughter had lived with her since late 2013 since her husband did not want the child because of her disability.

“Karine” 
Karine. 44, filed a complaint against her husband in 2016, after he beat and raped her for many years, but the authorities’ response led her to abandon the process. She said:

I had to forgive my husband and go back to him. Police and municipality officials insisted that I do so, and also withdraw my complaint. They said that it’s a family matter, that my husband was [psychologically] sick, and that it was my duty to help him. Police told me that even if I pursued the complaint, it would not lead to anything, just some fine.

  • The Armenian government should:
    Ensure the prompt, thorough, and impartial investigation of all domestic violence cases, using methods that mitigate risks for survivors, and prosecute and punish the attackers;
  • Systematically train police, judges, and other relevant authorities in domestic violence response, including filing and investigating complaints, in line with international standards;
  • Ensure immediate access to protection for survivors of domestic abuse through availability of shelter spaces, including in rural areas, and short- and long-term protection orders;
  • Ensure that survivors and their children have access to quality, comprehensive and inclusive medical, psychological, legal, and other services;
  • Conduct campaigns to educate the public about the new law, how to file complaints, and the availability of services;
  • Ensure that enforcement of the law includes victims in non-marital intimate relationships;
  • Swiftly adopt relevant changes to the criminal code to ensure appropriate punishments commensurate with the gravity of the abuse;
  • Revise the criminal code to include an aggravating circumstance covering crimes committed within the family or domestic unit or between former or current spouses or partners, whether or not the abuser shares or has shared the same residence with the victim, in line with the Istanbul Convention; this approach allows for the use of the generic provisions in the criminal law while imposing a higher sentence in cases of domestic violence;
  • Consider addressing domestic violence as a dedicated criminal offense. This can provide an optimal response particularly in cases of abusive patterns of behavior in which isolated acts of violence do not reach the criminal threshold; and
  • Ratify the International Convention on Domestic Violence without delay