Armenian Ambassador to attend Biden inauguration

Save

Share

 17:41,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 18, ARMENPRESS. Armenia’s Ambassador to the United States Varuzhan Nersesyan will attend the inauguration of Joe Biden as the 46th President of the United States of America, Armenian foreign ministry spokeswoman Anna Naghdalyan told Armenpress.

The inauguration will take place on January 20 and will be attended by the foreign ambassadors accredited in the US.

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

No one ever rejected communication between Armenia and Artsakh – Lavrov’s response to Azeri media

Save

Share

 16:33,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 18, ARMENPRESS. At no point during the decades of negotiations was an issue of cutting off Armenia and Karabakh (Artsakh) from one another voiced, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said at a news conference when asked by an Azerbaijani news outlet “why Armenian officials are visiting Karabakh without Baku’s permission, and what is Moscow’s stance in this regard.”

“In all agreements, first of all in the [2020] November 9 statement, the sides’ consent is recorded on ensuring communication between Armenia and Karabakh through the Lachin corridor, which is under the control of the Russian peacekeepers. No one ever rejected Armenia’s communication with Karabakh. The issue of cutting off Armenia and Karabakh from one another was never voiced during the negotiations that continued for decades. And that is why the Lachin corridor, as a concept, was not rejected by anyone. And just like in the past, it is subject of consent of the sides, including the consent of our Azerbaijani neighbors. And just like this, a reliable and permanent communication will be established between the western regions of Azerbaijan and Nakhijevan. This is stipulated in the trilateral statement. If we agree – and everyone does agree – that a communication between the Armenians of Nagorno Karabakh and Armenia must exist, I do not see reasons for obstructing the contacts in that level,” Lavrov said.

Government officials of Armenia are involved in the process of providing humanitarian aid to Nagorno Karabakh, which doesn’t get any negative reaction from Azerbaijan, and according to Lavrov it would be strange if it were otherwise.

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

Former Minister of Healthcare to assume position of chief of staff of PM’s Office

Save

Share

 17:24,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 18, ARMENPRESS. Former Minister of Healthcare of Armenia Arsen Torosyan will assume the position of chief of staff of the Prime Minister’s Office.

The respective decision has been signed by Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan.

Earlier today, based on the PM’s proposal, President Armen Sarkissian has signed a decree on appointing Anahit Avanesyan as Minister of Healthcare.

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

Armenian Deputy PM, Renco CEO discuss construction process of TPP in Yerevan

Save

Share

 18:30,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 18, ARMENPRESS. Deputy Prime Minister of Armenia Tigran Avinyan received on January 18 Renco's CEO Giovanni Rubini.

As ARMENPRESS was informed from the Office of Tigran Avinyan, the sides discusses the implementation process of the agreement signed on November 13, 2019 about the construction of a 250 megawatt combined-cycle power plant.

Giovanni Rubini presented the process of the works, noting that  though there are some delays conditioned by the COVID-19 pandemic, the current pace is rather promising and it will be possible to launch the TPP at its full scale in autumn, 2021. Renco’s CEO thanked the Government for the assistance.

Tigran Avinyan assessed the construction of the TPP as a successful project. The Deputy PM expressed the readiness of the Government of Armenia to continue the cooperation, expressing satisfaction over the ongoing works.

The sides agreed to continue discussions over future projects.

Armenpress: Armenian, Russian FMs refer to regional security issues

Armenian, Russian FMs refer to regional security issues

Save

Share

 20:52,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 18, ARMENPRESS. Foreign Minister of Armenia Ara Ayvazian had a phone conversation with Russian FM Sergey Lavrov on January 18.

As ARMENPRESS was informed from the press service of the Foreign Ministry of Armenia, the FMs referred to issues of establishing stability and ensuring security in the region.

In the context of the implementation of the November 9 and January 11 statements, Minister Ayvazyan once again highlighted the full implementation of humanitarian issues, first of all the priority of returning POWs and other kept as hostages.

Minister Ayvazian drew the attention of his Russian counterpart to the importance of preserving the Armenian religious, cultural and historical heritage in the territories of Artsakh that have passed under the Azerbaijani control and the unobstructed involvement of international specialized institutions in those works.

The interlocutor also exchanged views on Armenian-Russian bilateral and multilateral agenda.

The California Courier Online, January 21, 2021

The California
Courier Online, January 21, 2021

 

1 –        Armenia’s Defeated Leader Is Unable

            To Resolve
Problems from the Lost War

            By Harut
Sassounian

            Publisher,
The California
Courier

            www.TheCaliforniaCourier.com

2-         Renowned
Humanitarian, Educator
Garbis Der-Yeghiayan
Passes Away

3-         Armenia continues to fight COVID-19
pandemic

4-         COMMENTARY: An
alum’s view on 'Censorship and Corruption at AUA'

5-         Letters to
the Editor

 

*****************************************

******************************************

1 –        Armenia’s Defeated Leader Is Unable

            To Resolve
Problems from the Lost War

            By Harut
Sassounian

            Publisher,
The California
Courier

            www.TheCaliforniaCourier.com

There are three reasons why Armenia is in such a state of chaos
and confusion:

The first reason is that Armenia, as the defeated side in
the war, has very little leverage in the implementation of the “Statement” or
agreement signed on Nov. 9, 2020 by the President of Azerbaijan, Prime Minister
of Armenia and President of Russia.

The second reason is that since the text of the “Statement”
was vague, key details were left out causing uncertainty.

The third problem is that Prime Minister Nikole Pashinyan,
as the demoralized head of the defeated side, is in no position to resolve or
minimize the damage caused by the war. The reasons for his ineffectiveness are:
his failings during the war and his mismanagement and inexperience throughout
his tenure as Prime Minister.

The only proper course for Armenia is for Pashinyan to resign
on his own free will without any pressures, demonstrations, and ugly
confrontations. While it is horrible that Armenia was defeated by powerful
outside enemies during the war, it is much worse when Armenians treat each
other as enemies. Those who say that no one can replace Pashinyan are insulting
the Armenian nation. No one is irreplaceable. There are plenty of competent and
intelligent Armenians both in Armenia
and the Diaspora who can manage Armenia
competently. The new leader should be neither a part of those in power now nor
those of the past. The Armenian people will choose Pashinyan’s successor
through democratic elections. Armenia
needs fresh blood!

Returning to the Nov. 9, 2020 agreement, it is strange that
specific deadlines were set for several of its provisions—such as the
withdrawal of Armenian troops from the various territories surrounding
Artsakh—but point 8 of the agreement, the “exchange of prisoners of war,
hostages and other detained persons, and dead bodies” had no specific deadline.
Prime Minister Pashinyan should have insisted on a deadline before signing the
agreement. Thousands of Armenian families are in an extremely tragic situation,
not knowing whether their loved ones are dead or alive. Meanwhile, many of the
Armenian prisoners of war are being tortured by Azeri officials in
contravention of the Geneva Convention. Azeri soldiers have shamelessly
videotaped themselves decapitating or cutting off the ears and limbs of
captured Armenian soldiers and civilians. This is a continuing war crime which
should be presented to international courts.

Armenia
and Azerbaijan
exchanged a small number of prisoners shortly after the war. The fate and the
number of the rest of captured Armenian soldiers remain unknown.

After a lengthy and frustrating wait, the leaders of Armenia, Azerbaijan
and Russia finally met in Moscow on January 11,
2021, to take decisions on two key points: 1) the exchange of prisoners of war
and hostages; and 2) determination of the final status of Artsakh, according to
an announcement made before the meeting by the Armenian Prime Minister’s
office.

Shockingly, after the Moscow
meeting, a new agreement was signed by the three leaders mentioning only point
9 of the Nov. 9, 2020 agreement: “the unblocking of all economic and
transportation routes in the region.” This means that Armenia would be able to
use the railway that starts in Northern Armenia, crosses Nakhichevan and exits
in Armenia’s South on its way to Iran. Armenia
would also be able to use the railway that crosses mainland Azerbaijan, reaching Baku
and then Moscow.
Azerbaijan, on the other
hand, would have a route through Southern Armenia linking Nakhichevan to
mainland Azerbaijan.
Very short deadlines were set to form high level committees on the
transportation routes without mentioning either the exchange of prisoners of
war or the final status of Artsakh. Amazingly, Pashinyan announced immediately
after the summit meeting: “Today we failed to resolve the issue of prisoners of
war, this is the most sensitive issue. We agreed that we will continue [talks]
in this direction. I hope we will be able to come to a concrete solution as
soon as possible…. Unfortunately, it is impossible to resolve all issues in one
meeting.” The Moscow meeting was a second defeat
for Armenia.

Pashinyan’s comments should be unacceptable to all
Armenians, regardless of whether they support him or not. How could he have sat
in a meeting for four hours with Presidents Putin and Aliyev and not insisted on
the immediate exchange of the prisoners of war? Two months have passed since
the ceasefire! No one knows when Putin, Aliyev and Pashinyan will meet again to
resolve this critical issue. This is no way to defend Armenia’s
interests, even considering the dire situation of a defeated country. Pashinyan
should have made clear at the meeting that priority number one was the exchange
of prisoners. Unless it was decided that these prisoners would be exchanged
within a few days, he would refuse to discuss any other issue with them. How
can Armenia and Azerbaijan discuss the unblocking of
transportation routes between the two countries while Armenian prisoners are
languishing in Baku
jails and tortured? Furthermore, neither the November agreement nor the
subsequent Moscow announcement indicated who
will pay for the construction of the road and railway linking Nakhichevan to
mainland Azerbaijan through Armenia.

While Armenia’s
Prime Minister continues to negotiate from a position of weakness, the Azeri
side is becoming even more strident; warning Armenia’s leaders not to travel to
Artsakh after the Armenian Foreign Minister went there. Azerbaijan
insisted that this was a violation of the Nov. 9, 2020 agreement, although
there is no such prohibition in the agreement. In addition, Azerbaijan
announced that the Armenian prisoners of war would be tried as ‘terrorists’;
therefore, not subject to an exchange. Even though Armenia is in a very difficult
situation after the war, Armenian leaders have to fight hard to protect the
country’s interests as much as possible. The more subservient Armenia’s
leaders behave, the more demanding Azeris and Turks become.

Regrettably, Pashinyan seems to have convinced himself that
unblocking transportation routes between Armenia
and Azerbaijan would boost Armenia’s
economy. I seriously doubt this is true. Would any Armenian feel safe traveling
or sending goods through Azerbaijan?
Who will protect them? More problematic is Armenia’s agreement to allow
Azerbaijan a road and railway link between the two countries, allowing Turkey
to cross Nakhichevan, and then through Armenia’s Southern region reach mainland
Azerbaijan and onwards to the Turkic Republics of Central Asia. This is the
century-old Pan-Turanian dream of Turkey which is now about to become
a reality. Such a route would undermine Armenia’s sovereignty and endanger
its existence. The Armenian people and its government should do everything in
their power to block this Pan-Turanian connection. Giving access to Azerbaijan and Turkey
to cross Armenia’s
territory has absolutely nothing to do with the Artsakh war and such a
provision should not have been included in the Nov. 9, 2020 agreement.

I fear that Armenia’s
downhill slide will continue as long as the country is ruled by a Prime
Minister who is primarily responsible for the loss of Armenian lands and the
deaths of thousands of soldiers.

************************************************************************************************************************************************

 

2-         Renowned
Humanitarian, Educator
Garbis Der-Yeghiayan
Passes Away

LOS ANGELES—Prof. Garbis Der-Yeghiayan, president of
Mashdots College, passed away on January 12 in Los Angeles due to a rapid
deterioration of his health after testing COVID-19 positive.

Born in Beirut, Lebanon in 1949, Der-Yeghiayan earned bachelor’s
degrees in Political Science/Public Administration and Mathematics (Summa Cum
Laude) as well as Master’s degrees in Educational Administration and
International Relations from the American
University of Beirut. At the age of 17, he began teaching
at both the elementary and high school level in Beirut
before serving as high school principal in Lebanon at the age of 22. After
moving to the United States
in 1976, he attended Northwestern University earning his doctorate in Human Development
and Social Policy, and the University
of La Verne earning a
second doctorate in Educational Management.

Prof. Der-Yeghiayan served as dean and president, as well as
professor of Education and International Relations at the American Armenian
International College/University of La
Verne from 1976 to 1992. Afterwards, he served for
many years as president and professor of Educational Management and
International Relations/Public Diplomacy at Mashdots
College in Glendale, California.
He authored fourteen books on current affairs, history and education, and has
presented more than 100 scholarly papers at international conferences.

Prof. Der-Yeghiayan served on 11 non-profit boards and
committees, including Commissioner of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s
Department Inmate Welfare Services. He was the host of three weekly live television
programs.

Prof. Der-Yeghiayan was a dedicated Rotarian. He joined the
Rotary Club of La Verne in 1981, served with distinction as president in
1984-85 and International Service chair 1982-84 and 1985-1998. Through his
efforts, the Rotary Club of La Verne was able to establish the first Rotary
Club in the former Soviet Union.

Prof. Der Yeghiayan held the record for organizing 30
consecutive peace conferences for Rotary International. He was internationally
renowned as a visionary peacemaker and was the recipient of numerous awards
from world leaders. In appreciation of his unprecedented efforts in
peace-building and conflict resolution, the Peace Institute of Rotary
International District 5300 was named in his honor in 2014.

In March, 2019 Dr. Der Yeghiayan led a high-ranking Rotary
peace delegation to the Holy Land.

Prof. Der Yeghiayan is survived by his wife, Angela; his son
James and Tanya Der Yeghiayan, and their children, Micah, Ethan and Caleb; son
Johnny and Tiffany Der Yeghiayan, and their daughter, Juliana; his brother
Samuel; brother, Hopig; and sister, Knar Der Yeghiayan Toutounjian and family;
and many relatives, colleagues, students and friends.

 

************************************************************************************************************************************************

3 –        Armenia continues to fight COVID-19
pandemic

The Armenian government has commissioned 600,000 doses of
coronavirus vaccines from World Health Organization-backed COVAX; medical and
social workers, seniors and people suffering from chronic diseases will be the
first to get vaccine shots free of charge, and according to Gayane Sahakian,
the deputy director of the National Center for Disease Control and Prevention,

The first vaccine which COVAX will make available to the
participating countries is the one produced by AstraZeneca, which will deliver
it to COVAX in February or March.

They will be enough to vaccinate 300,000 people. According
to the Ministry of Health, there were 8,614 active coronavirus cases in Armenia as of
January 18. Armenia
has recorded 164,676 coronavirus cases and 2,998  deaths; 153,064 have recovered.

**********************************************************************************************************************************************

4-
       
COMMENTARY: An alum’s view
on 'Censorship and Corruption at AUA'

By Prof. Armen Hovakimian

 

I have read the opinion piece written by an anonymous
faculty member of the American University of Armenia (AUA), titled “Censorship
and Corruption at American University of Armenia,” published in The California
Courier (January 14, 2021) and would like to offer a comment. Though I don't
agree with many of the author's statements, I do think the author raises issues
that are important not just for AUA but for many other institutions in Armenia.

First, let me say that I am an AUA alum and graduated from
its MBA program in 1993. I am a tenured full professor in US and neither my
career nor my livelihood depends on AUA. I am very grateful for the role AUA
has played in my life and I know my friends feel the same way. Over the years,
the class of 1993 has made various financial contributions to AUA, including to
AUA’s 100 Pillars fundraising campaign and its ChangeMakers campaign. None of
this would have happened if we did not strongly believe in AUA and its mission.

Let me now turn to three specific issues raised in the
anonymous opinion.

First, I do believe in the right of the faculty and students
to express their opinions, both inside and outside the university. I have seen
the letter signed by 45 members of the faculty and personally see no issues
with the letter. That said, I have noticed that the letter was also signed by
some members of the university leadership, specifically three of its five
deans. That could be problematic for the University for number of reasons. The
rules governing the behavior of students, faculty, and the leadership are
typically different. What may be ok for students may not be ok for faculty.
What may be ok for faculty may not be ok for leadership. The general public is
likely to attribute an individual’s view to the institution when the individual
is a member of the leadership of that institution. Yet, it is important for an
institution like AUA to be apolitical. The mission of AUA is to have a positive
impact on its students and the community at large and contribute to the advancement
of Armenia.
That mission can be jeopardized if the community views AUA as an institution
affiliated with some political forces and against some others. Furthermore, the
faculty and students may feel that they have to toe a certain line if it is
expressed by a politically outspoken administrator. Subordinates may feel
compelled to sign a petition that bears the signature of a senior
administrator. People who decline to sign may be as concerned about retribution
as those who do. For these reasons, senior administrators have a responsibility
to vet their potentially controversial public statements with the university.

Second, let us consider the university’s reaction. As an
alum, I have received the email on the topic of diversity of opinions sent to
the University community from the President of the University. I’m not sure if
this is what the anonymous author calls “an attack of freedom of speech,” but I
did not find anything objectionable in it. There was no warning against
expressing an opinion in the President’s email. If I were to guess I would say
that the President might have simply felt that it was a good time to remind
everyone about certain university policies as one could anticipate further
expressions of political views, both within the University and more publicly.

Obviously, I do not know anything about what else might have
happened within the university in the aftermath of the letter. The anonymous
author alleges recriminations from colleagues who did not agree with the letter
and that faculty were summoned by the President. I hope the University
addresses this allegation. Since I do not know the content, the form, or the
extent of these interactions, I will not comment on how appropriate they were,
except to say that just like the 45 signatories of the letter, other faculty
have a right to express their views, including to their colleagues, as long as
that happens in a respectful nonthreatening manner.

Third, the anonymous opinion accuses the University of
corruption in relation to its hiring of the current acting provost and his
spouse. Again, I do not know any details, but the fact itself is neither
surprising nor corrupt. I have no doubt that it is very hard for AUA to hire
qualified faculty or administrators from abroad. There is nothing corrupt in
offering a joint appointment to both spouses, assuming they are both qualified
for the positions they are taking. That happens in US universities as well. My
understanding is that that the acting provost assumed the position because the
previous provost resigned to take a position of a president at another
university. It is not surprising that one of the deans was asked to step in as
an acting provost. The fact that the spouse also works at the University is not
a disqualifying factor for such an appointment. What typically happens in such
cases is simply that the person with administrative power recuses himself or
herself from any administrative decisions that directly affect their spouse. I
can only assume that is what happens at AUA as well.

Let me finish by stating that the views expressed in this
letter are mine only. I deeply care about AUA as an institution and believe in
its mission and that is the only motivation behind this letter.

Armen Hovakimian is a professor of finance at the Zicklin School
of Business at Baruch
College, at The City
University of New York.

He holds a BS in Computer Engineering from Yerevan
Polytechnic Institute, an MBA from American
University of Armenia, and a PhD in finance from Boston College.

************************************************************************************************************************************************

5-         Letters to
the Editor

 

 

Dear Editor:

 

As a response to the article “Censorship and Corruption at American University
of Armenia”
published in The California Courier on January 14, 2021, we officially state
that the article is factually inaccurate.

Prior to publishing the article, the editor(s) did not take
the necessary step of fact-checking the piece. The University was never
contacted in order to confirm any information. As a result, the article is
merely an _expression_ of individual perception and opinion, which does not
correspond to reality.

 

The American University of Armenia

Yerevan,
Armenia

 

 

Dear Editor:

 

Regarding Raffy Ardhaldjian’s letter on the January 14, 2021
California Courier issue.

In my opinion, we lost the war in 1994 immediately after we
defeated Azerbaijan
and liberated Artsakh and the surrounding areas. At that time when Aliyev
accepted defeat and asked for cease fire, Ter-Petrosyan/Armenia agreed. But
instead of demanding that “we will stop the war only if Aliyev/Azerbaijan
signed a peace treaty accepting that Karbajar and Artsakh belong to Armenia and
Azerbaijan has no more claims.” Ter-Petrosyan almost immediately after the
victory was ready to return to Azerbaijan
the buffer zones “to establish peace.” Just imagine the victor not the
vanquished was ready to return territories liberated by war for peace.

As for the current loss, I agree that Armenia throughout
history has had poor diplomats and we should add no oil, and Mr. Ardhaldjian is
right at the end Azerbaijan won—but because of Turkey’s and Israel’s, Jihadist
Mercenaries’, Pakistanis’ and Putin’s/Russia’s help. These are not
justification by Mr. Sassounian and others, these are facts. Second, blaming
the Armenian Lobby is wrong; they did their utmost and accomplished a lot. As
for, “it takes humility to accept such defeat.” This is not a sport event,
discussion, etc. This is war; therefore, humility has no place.

 

Bedros H. Kojian

Orange, CA

 

***********************************************************************************************************************************************

***********************************************************************************************************************************************

 

California Courier Online provides viewers of the Armenian News
News Service with a few of the articles in this week's issue of The California
Courier.  Letters to the editor are
encouraged through our e-mail address, .
However, authors are requested to provide their names, addresses, and/or
telephone numbers to verify identity, if any question arises. California
Courier subscribers are requested not to use this service to change, or modify
mailing addresses. Those changes can be made through our e-mail, ,
or by phone, (818) 409-0949.

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 01/18/2021

                                        Monday, 

Deal On Karabakh’s Status Not Urgent For Russia

        • Aza Babayan

RUSSIA -- Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov holds his annual press 
conference via video link, Moscow, 

The status of Nagorno-Karabakh remains unresolved and it must be a subject of 
future Armenian-Azerbaijani negotiations, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov 
said on Monday.

In the meantime, he stressed, the disputed territory will be protected by 
Russian peacekeeping forces deployed there after a Moscow-brokered agreement 
that stopped the Armenian-Azerbaijani war on November 10.

“Precisely because the problem of the status is so thorny it was decided by the 
three leaders [of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia] to circumvent and leave it to 
the future,” Lavrov told a news conference in Moscow. “The [Russian, U.S. and 
French] co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group must deal with this as well. They have 
resumed their contacts with the parties and are going to visit the region again.”

He suggested that the return to normality and confidence-building measures in 
the conflict zone will eventually facilitate an agreement on the main sticking 
point.

Speaking after his talks with Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev hosted by 
Russian President Vladimir Putin last week, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian said 
that Karabakh’s status is among “many issues” that have yet to be settled by the 
conflicting sides. Yerevan maintains that Karabakh’s population must be able to 
exercise its right to self-determination in line peace proposals made by the 
Russian, U.S. and French mediators.

By contrast, Aliyev again said after the Moscow talks that the six-week war, 
which resulted in sweeping Azerbaijani territorial gains, essentially resolved 
the long-running conflict.

Earlier this month, Aliyev demanded that Armenian officials stop visiting 
Karabakh without Baku’s permission. The Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry said 
Armenian Foreign Minister Ara Ayvazian’s recent trip to Stepanakert violated the 
ceasefire agreement.

Yerevan rejected those claims as “completely baseless.” Lavrov also dismissed 
them, arguing that the agreement brokered by Putin provides for a land corridor 
between Armenia and Karabakh, which is also guarded by the Russian peacekeepers.

“If we agree … that there must be a link between the Armenians of Karabakh and 
Armenia then I see no reason why contacts carried out at that level should be 
hampered,” he said. “Armenian officials are involved in the provision of 
humanitarian assistance to Karabakh which does not cause negative emotions in 
Baku.”

Lavrov stressed at the same time that Armenian leaders should avoid making 
“emotional” statements when visiting Karabakh. He chided them for making such 
statements before the war.



New Lawmaker Defends Exit From Ruling Bloc

        • Naira Nalbandian

Armenia -- Anna Grigorian is sworn in as a member of the Armenian parliament, 
Yerevan, .

A new member of Armenia’s parliament on Monday defended her decision to defect 
from the ruling My Step bloc and backed calls for Prime Minister Nikol 
Pashinian’s resignation.

The 29-year-old Anna Grigorian took up a vacant seat in the National Assembly 
two years after participating in the last Armenian parliamentary elections on 
the My Step ticket. She replaced a pro-government lawmaker who resigned last 
month.

“I believe that a government defeated in the war [in Nagorno-Karabakh] must 
inevitably resign,” Grigorian told reporters after being sworn in as a 
parliament deputy.

In that regard, Grigorian dismissed Pashinian’s offer to hold snap parliamentary 
elections to resolve a political crisis sparked by Armenia’s defeat in the 
recent war. She said such polls must be held by a new, interim government made 
up of “technocrats.”

Accordingly, she did not endorse a caretaker prime minister nominated by an 
alliance of Armenian opposition parties campaigning for Pashinian’s resignation. 
“I do not support any political force right now,” she stressed.

Four other deputies affiliated with My Step quit the parliament’s pro-government 
majority shortly after the Russian-brokered ceasefire agreement that stopped the 
six-week war on November 10. Their and Grigorian’s defections reduced to 83 the 
number of seats officially controlled by Pashinian’s bloc in the 132-member 
legislature.

The defectors have drawn stern rebukes from senior lawmakers remaining loyal to 
Pashinian. Deputy parliament speaker Alen Simonian questioned their legitimacy 
on Monday, saying that they owe their parliament seats to the prime minister’s 
popularity.


Armenia -- Deputies from the ruling My Step bloc attend the opening of a regular 
session of the Armenian parliament, Yerevan, .


“It is very doubtful that many, many people would sit in the National Assembly 
if it wasn’t for Nikol Pashinian, the main driving force of [My Step’s landslide 
victory in] the last elections,” said Simonian.

Grigorian dismissed the criticism while acknowledging Pashinian’s personal 
contribution to her performance in the December 2018 elections.

“I want to remind that I was elected from an individual constituency,” she said. 
“I got more than 5,500 votes and a large part of them were given to me as an 
individual and to the team which I represented.”

Grigorian represents a constituency in Armenia’s southeastern Syunik province 
which was directly affected by the recent war.

Many Syunik residents have been angered by Armenian troop withdrawals from 
adjacent districts southwest of Karabakh, which were handed back to Azerbaijan 
as part of the ceasefire deal, and ensuing Armenian-Azerbaijani border 
delimitations. They say that they can no longer feel safe because Azerbaijani 
forces are now deployed dangerously close to their communities.

The mayors of virtually all Syunik towns have issued statements demanding 
Pashinian’s resignation. Some of them organized protests that forced the prime 
minister to cut short on December 21 a trip to the mountainous region.



Armenian Health Minister Replaced

        • Robert Zargarian

Armenia -- Health Minister Arsen Torosian speaks at a meeting of a task force 
coordinating the Armenian government's response to coronavirus outbreak, 
Yerevan, April 27, 2020.

Health Minister Arsen Torosian was sacked and appointed as chief of Prime 
Minister Nikol Pashinian’s staff on Monday.

In separate decrees requested by Pashinian, President Armen Sarkissian relieved 
Torosian of his duties and appointed his first deputy, Anahit Avanesian, as 
Armenia’s new health minister.

Torosian in turn replaced Eduard Aghajanian as chief of the prime minister’s 
staff. Aghajanian has been a key member of Pashinian’s political team.

Pashinian did not explain the moves. Torosian also issued no statements on his 
sacking and new appointment predicted by some Armenian media outlets over the 
weekend.

Torosian, 38, is a senior member of Pashinian’s Civil Contract party who was 
appointed as health minister right after the “Velvet Revolution” of April-May 
2018. Throughout his tenure he has been criticized not only by opposition groups 
but also some pro-government parliamentarians.

The criticism intensified after the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, which has 
hit Armenia hard. Torosian has repeatedly defended his and other government 
officials’ response to the unprecedented health crisis strongly condemned by the 
Armenian opposition.

It was not immediately clear whether Pashinian decided to replace the health 
minister because of the pandemic or as part of a cabinet reshuffle promised by 
him shortly after the Russian-brokered ceasefire that stopped the autumn war in 
Nagorno-Karabakh on November 10.

Six other Armenian ministers were sacked in late November and early December.


Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2021 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

 


Azerbaijani MP: “Israel can play a role during reconstruction process in Karabakh”

The Jewish Press
Jan 17 2021

        | The Jewish Press – JewishPress.com | Rachel Avraham | 4 Shevat 5781 – | JewishPress.com

As we speak, Russian President Vladimir Putin is meeting with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan to lay the grounds for a lasting settlement to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, after 44 days of war ended in a cease-fire agreement. In the eyes of Azerbaijani MP Azay Guliyev, who heads the Azerbaijani delegation to the OSCE PA and who serves as Vice President of the OSCE PA, the State of Israel can contribute “to the reconstruction process in Karabakh at this stage and be actively involved in this process.”

“First, we are incredibly pleased with the level of friendship and cooperation between Israel and Azerbaijan,” MP Guliyev proclaimed. “In recent years, cooperation between the two countries in the fields of energy, technology, agriculture, and military industry has developed significantly. This is not accidental, because Azerbaijan is one of the very few countries, and perhaps the first one, where the Jews live in the most comfortable, peaceful, and safe conditions, without any discrimination. I know that the Jews living in Israel also have a special respect for Azerbaijanis and appreciate all our positive steps and actions. I think that these friendly relations and cooperation should continue.”

        | The Jewish Press – JewishPress.com | Rachel Avraham | 4 Shevat 5781 – | JewishPress.com

“At this time, I am less optimistic about American and European involvement on the Karabakh issue,” MP Guliyev noted. “As for the European countries and the United States, I think that these countries should first express their strong opposition to the forces supporting occupation, aggression, and ethnic separatism, and emphasize at every opportunity that this is unacceptable. These countries must openly call on Armenia to refrain from revanchist tendencies and actions, not to interfere in the internal affairs of Azerbaijan, and to renounce the hateful rhetoric against Azerbaijanis. I think that giving such messages would be an extraordinarily strong signal for the former occupant country at this stage.”

According to him, the United States and Europe despite their past mistakes can still play a positive role in promoting peace between Azerbaijan and Armenia, in recognition of the new realities on the ground: “Armenia must face up to the fact that the only guarantee of its future development is directly connected with regional cooperation rather than baseless territorial claims against Azerbaijan.”

Regarding Russia, MP Guliyev stressed that they have been involved in implementing the peace agreement from the very beginning and that Azerbaijan expects them to implement every part of the agreement, “especially regarding the withdrawal of illegal armed groups from the area. These illegal armed groups pose a terrorist threat to us, and they must leave Azerbaijan under the agreement. Unfortunately, we do not see it yet.”

“On the contrary, terrorist groups, inspired by the inaction of Russian peacekeepers, dare to attack, and kill Azerbaijani soldiers,” he added. “It is true that such terrorists are adequately responded to and immediately neutralized. However, this work must be done by peacekeepers. On November 10, we agreed to allow Russian peacekeepers to come here to prevent additional bloodshed and for the Armenian militants to voluntarily leave our country, and therefore the peacekeepers must perform their duties properly. Of course, such a situation does not satisfy us, and it causes legitimate dissatisfaction in society.”

For Azerbaijan, one of their greatest tasks after restoring their territorial integrity is to rebuild the infrastructure that was destroyed: “To this end, there is a need to take appropriate measures to ensure peaceful coexistence between Azerbaijanis and Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh.” After all, a region cannot fully economically recover from the trauma of conflict, unless there is a full cessation of all hostilities.

“It is true that the Armenian leadership committed numerous crimes against our people over the last 30 years,” MP Guliyev stressed. “They massacred peaceful Azerbaijani civilians in Khojaly, destroyed all our occupied cities and villages, destroyed or altered Azerbaijani historical monuments as well as perpetrated environmental terror in and around Nagorno Karabakh. Of course, it is not easy to forget all of them and forgive those perpetrators. However, we must be able to look into the future, so that our children and grandchildren can have a better tomorrow than what we experienced in our lifetimes.”

In this sense, MP Guliyev would like to emphasize and stress his high appreciation for the statement issued by Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, “Our citizens of Armenian descent living in Nagorno-Karabakh can enjoy all the opportunities, rights and freedoms provided by Azerbaijan’s constitution.” According to him, “This means that Azerbaijan, as a state, fully guarantees the security, economic and social welfare of Armenians wishing to live here. This is an especially important political will for living together in peace. Thus, any Armenian who is willing to obey and respect the Azerbaijani constitution can live beside us. In this case, I am convinced of the potential to establish a long-lasting peace in the region.”

“We all know that the long-running wars and hostilities in Europe ended with the realization of the fact that peace, coexistence, and respect for neighbors are inevitable,” he concluded. “Europe should share this experience with Armenia and encourage it to establish normal relations with its neighbors, rather than remaining passive as the French parliament issued one-sided and provocative declarations that hinder the chances for a peaceful co-existence of two nations in South Caucuses.”

New report reveals organized hate speech and animosity towards Armenians in Azerbaijan

Public Radio of Armenia
Jan 17 2021
New report reveals organized hate speech and animosity towards Armenians in Azerbaijan – Public Radio of Armenia

The Human Rights Defenders of Armenia and the Republic of Artsakh have published a joint ad hoc public report on Organized Hate Speech and Animosity towards Ethnic Armenians in Azerbaijan.

“President of Azerbaijan and other authorities speak of the entire Armenian people and population of Armenia with open threats of ethnic cleansing and genocide,” Armenia’s Human Rights Defender Arman Tatoyan says.

“They openly insult the dignity of the Armenian people, incite hostility, they do it to humiliate the personal dignity of every Armenian in the world, every person living in Armenia,” teh Ombudman says.

The monitoring of the staff of the Human Rights Defender of Armenia confirms that this is a policy of deep state hatred and enmity towards Armenians. It is institutional in nature and is based on ethnicity and, in some cases, religious affiliation.

New report reveals organized hate speech and animosity towards Armenians in Azerbaijan – Public Radio of Armenia

The Ombudsman draws attention to the fact that the Presidents of Turkey and Azerbaijan often compare the war of September-November 2020 with the Armenian Genocide in the Ottoman Empire and the massacres of Armenians in Baku. In particulate, he reminds of the praise for the organizers and perpetrators of those atrocities, including members of the Caucasus Islamic Army, in the speeches of December 10 (during the military parade in Baku).

Another issue the Human Rights Defender points to is that during this war, the Azerbaijani Armed Forces use the same words and expressions as the President of Azerbaijan when torturing Armenian soldiers and civilians, beheading them alive, mutilating the bodies of the victims and committing other atrocities.

Moreover, he says, the expressions of the President of Azerbaijan and other public figures became slogans inspiring atrocities against Armenians in this war (for example, “Azerbaijani soldiers chase them like dogs”, “Armenia is a worthless country … it is an artificial state created on the ancient lands of Azerbaijan,” “Azerbaijan is coming to end Armenian weddings,” etc.).

“In other words, the real causes of these war crimes are obvious. Moreover, the Azerbaijani military are proud of the atrocities, well aware that they will only be encouraged and praised for it in their own country,” ARman Tatoyan says.