Journal of Society for Armenian Studies Releases Volume 28.1 on Theme of Performance

Opening pages of “A Pictorial Guide” showing children, including Tolegian Hughes' daughter at the center, at the door of Saints Joachim and Anne Armenian Apostolic Church, Palos Heights, Illinois. Photo courtesy of Lenore Tolegian Hughes

The Society for Armenian Studies announces the release of Volume 28, Issue 1 (Spring 2021) of the Journal of the Society for Armenian Studies, edited by Tamar M. Boyadjian (Michigan State University) and Rachel Goshgarian (Lafayette College) the Reviews and Reconsiderations Editor. This volume of the JSAS includes four articles, one film review, one museum review, the newly created Matenadaran Review of Books, seven book reviews, and one article in the newly created On Graduate Studies section.

The articles within this volume are centered around the theme of performance by examining the cultural and social engagements of Armenians, the positionalities of these performers, and how they produce change through the arts and humanities. Topics found within this issue include theater, film noir, music in the Armenian diaspora, liturgy and ritual, and the individual’s inner world.

The volume begins with Ayşe Kadıoğlu’s study of the departure of Eliza Binemeciyan, a prominent Armenian star of the theater, from Istanbul. Kadıoğlu’s article, “Leaving a Life Behind: Eliza Binemeciyan’s Encounter with ‘the Banality of Evil,'” details the decline of cosmopolitanism and the rise of nationalism and Turkification policies in Istanbul. By shifting the attention from Binemeciyan’s absence to her presence, Kadıoğlu highlights the impact that the actress had in creating and sustaining Istanbul’s theaters at the turn of the 20th century.

Eliza Binemeciyan, Rasit Riza and Onnik Binemeciyan in the play curum. Source: Hrant Dink Foundation Archive, Hagop Ayvaz Collection

FIG 1:

Kadıoğlu’s article is followed by Sylvia Angelique Alajaji exploring making music in the Armenian diaspora in the “The Soundscapes of Our Elsewheres,” a conversation with ethnomusicologist Lara Sarkissian. As a music composer, filmmaker, sound artist, and producer, Sarkissian delved into her Armenian experience and examined the ways in which it came to shape her art. Sarkissian discussed music and identity, “I don’t see this as visible or put out there, so why don’t I put this out there for my Iranian Armenian family and stories and see who that connects me to or who finds that also familiar to them.”

Kaveh Askari provided an in-depth study of crime films directed by Samuel Khachikian in “Samuel Khachikian and the Crime Thriller in Iran.” Askari discussed the mixed feelings brought on by the crime film genre in Tehran, Iran in the late 1950s and early 60s by dissecting Khachikian’s work. The small film community of midcentury Iran took part in constituting the global vernacular of film noir where one could according to Askari, “engage the promise of cinema, sometimes with playful enthusiasm about its possibilities and sometimes with a cynicism or anxiety about broken promises.”

FIG 2:

In following a deep dive into an artist’s work, Greg Levonian explores the many forms of home, which permeate William Saroyan’s works. In “William Saroyan’s Dream of Home,” Levonian looks through Saroyan’s works including, “Hello Out There,” “The Time of Your Life,” “The Beautiful People,” and “The Cave Dwellers” to showcase hope for the hopeless and adrift. By analyzing Saroyan’s depictions of home in his works, Levonian depicts hope to symbolize fresh beginnings and possibility – factors which make our existence worthwhile.

Samuel Khachikian

FIG 3:

Arto Vaun recounts visiting the The Parajanov Museum in Yerevan in, “A Museum, a World, a Poem: The Parajanov Museum as an Answer to Disorientation,” where Vaun embraces the artwork of Parajanov and draws deeper connections to his personal experiences and current affairs in Armenia. Sergei Parajanov’s inner world could be seen through his collages displayed in the museum – where his mind was free to roam past his immediate imprisonment and the rules of social realism dictated by the Soviet Union. The Parajanov Museum is one that is the most “soulful and sublime space” for Vaun, who depicts his countless visits to the colorful and full-of-life museum as a comforting space during difficult times. In finding meaning and reason within Parajanov’s art, Vaun adds, “Remember, before anything else, you are simply a human being! Don’t take yourself too seriously, and definitely don’t take others too seriously!” Vaun concludes his article by sharing a poem written at a young age on Parajanov’s “Self-Portrait with Haghpat in the Background, 1963”.

The final full-length article includes, “Performing Ritual, Ritualizing Performance: Objects that Act” by graduate students Elena Gittleman (Bryn Mawr College) and Erin Piñon (Princeton University). Gittleman and Piñon comment on the role of performance in their work and provide a theoretical framework for understanding objects in ritual. In one-part Gittleman and Piñon examine Lenore Tolegian Hughes’s, “A Pictorial Guide to the Badarak or Divine Liturgy of the Armenian Church,” which serves to inform and guide children by providing clear liturgical cues. In continuing their discussion, Piñon and Gittleman show, “the necessity, but also the difficulties, of bridging art history with theology, linguistics, anthropology, and performance studies – fields once considered tangential, or even well beyond it.”

Sergei Parajanov, Self-Portrait with Haghpat in the Backqround, 1963. Published with the permission of the Paraianov Museum, Yerevan, Armenia

FIG 4:

Additionally Hayk Hambardzumyan, Head of Publishing of the Mesrop Mashtoc‘ Institute of Ancient Manuscripts shared the article, “The 2020 Publications of the Mesrop Maštoc‘ Institute of Ancient Manuscripts at the Matendaran in Yerevan, Armenia,” which provided a summary on books published in 2020 by the Institute. Books included in the summary and those from prior years could be read on the digital library section of the Matenadaran website.

In addition to these articles, Volume 28, Issue 1 also contains the following film review: Dana Sajdi’s review of Zeynep Dadak’s “Invisible to the Eye” (Ah Gözel İstanbul). Traditional book reviews included: Tara L. Andrews’ reviews of translations by Robert Bedrosian of various texts from Classical Armenian; Kate Franklin and Ani Honarchian’s review of David Zakarian’s “Women, Too, Were Blessed: The Portrayal of Women in Early Christian Texts”; Vigen Galstyan’s review of Tigran Amiryan’s “Firdus: The Memory of a Place”; Vazken Khatchig Davidian’s review of Gabriella Belli and Edith Devaney’s “Liberating the Artist or Controlling the Narrative? A Review of Arshile Gorky 1904–1948”; Joseph A. Kéchichian’s review of George A. Bournoutian’s “From the Kur to the Aras: A Military History of Russia’s Move into the South Caucasus and the First Russo-Iranian War, 1801–1813”; Sosy Mishoyan Dabbaghian’s review of Hagop Ayvaz’s “My Stage Friends” [in Armenian]; and Christopher Sheklian’s review of Lerna Ekmekçioğlu’s “Recovering Armenia: The Limits of Belonging in Post-Genocide Turkey.”

The journal concluded with final words from Bedross Der Matossian (University of Nebraska, Lincon) in the passage, “In Memoriam, Dr. George Bournoutian (1943–2021).” Der Matossian shared the loss of Professor George Bournoutian, one of the most prominent figures in the Society for Armenian Studies who had been a member since its inception. Bournoutian had played a key role in contributing to the development of modern Armenian history in the West. In speaking of Bournoutian’s legacy, Der Matossian described his scholarship as one that is essential for today and added, “Professor Bournoutian has departed but has left a major legacy, a legacy that future generations will cherish.”

Commenting on this issue Der Matossian, the President of the Society for Armenian Studies said: “The richness of this volume on performance is just breathtaking. It shows how JSAS has become one of the most important mediums for publishing first class articles in the field of Armenian Studies. This would not have taken place without the visionary approach of Tamar M. Boyadjian (Michigan State University) and Rachel Goshgarian (Lafayette College) the Reviews and Reconsiderations Editor. Their dedication and commitment to advancing the field of Armenian Studies is astounding.”

Tamar M. Boyadjian, Michigan State University, continues as the Editor-in-chief. The Reviews and Reconsiderations Editor was Rachel Goshgarian, Lafayette College. The Advisory Board consists of: Bedross Der Matossian, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Barlow Der Mugrdechian, California State University, Fresno; Sergio La Porta, California State University Fresno; Sharon Kinoshita, University of California, Santa Cruz; Jyotsna Singh, Michigan State University; and Alison Vacca, Columbia University.The Editorial Board consists of: Sebouh Aslanian, University of California; Stephan Astourian, University of California, Berkeley; Marie-Aude Baronian, Universiteit van Amsterdam; Houri Berberian, University of California, Irvine; Talar Chahinian, University of California, Irvine; Hratch Tchilingirian, University of Oxford; Myrna Douzjian, University of California, Berkeley; Shushan Karapetian, University of Southern California; David Kazanjian, University of Pennsylvania; Lilit Keshishyan, University of Southern California; Tsolin Nalbantian, Universiteit Leiden; Christina Maranci, Tufts University; Elyse Semerdjian, Whitman College; and Heghnar Watenpaugh, University of California, Davis.

The table of contents for JSAS 28 (1) can be accessed online.

The Journal of the Society for Armenian Studies is a peer-reviewed journal and is published bi-annually by Brill. The Journal can be accessed online. If you are an SAS member, please contact SAS Executive Secretary Katarina Terzyan via email at [email protected] for either a print copy or online access to the volume. Copies of the latest volume, and back issues, are also available by contacting the SAS Executive Secretary, or can be ordered online.

Asbarez: Criminal Charges Filed Against Israeli Drone-Maker Suspected of Bombing Artsakh Target

A drone manufactured by Israel-based Aeronautics, which has been charged

Israeli drone-maker Aeronautics and three of its senior employees were charged on Wednesday with violating the law regulating defense exports in its dealing with one of its most prominent clients, reported Haaretz.

A gag order issued by the Rishon Letzion Magistrate’s Court prevents the publication of further details.

The firm has been under investigation for the past several years. In 2018 the Justice Ministry said prosecutors intended to press charges against its employees for aggravated fraud and violations of the defense export law.

In an unusual announcement in August 2017, the Defense Ministry said that it had suspended https://asbarez.com/israels-defense-ministry-suspends-drone-maker-deal-with-azerbaijan/ the marketing and export license for one of the firm’s attack drones to a significant customer in a foreign country. Police later launched an investigation into the matter.

That same month it was reported that the Defense Ministry’s Security Agency opened a probe into a complaint alleging that Aeronautics representatives demonstrated the use of a kamikaze drone in Azerbaijan by attacking a manned position in Artsakh.

The company denied the claim at the time and said that any operational use of the aircraft was only carried out by the buyer of the drone. Aeronautics Defense added that it never carries out demonstrations against live targets, as was the case in this instance.

Armenpress: Arman Akopian appointed Armenia’s Ambassador to Israel

Arman Akopian appointed Armenia’s Ambassador to Israel

Save

Share

 20:13, 28 December, 2021

YEREVAN, 28 DECEMBER, ARMENPRESS. By the decree of President Armen Sarkissian Arman Akopian is appointed as Ambassador of Armenia to Israel. As ARMENPRESS was informed from the President’s Office, the President signed his NH-412-A decree based on the Prime Minister’s proposal.

The residence of Arman Hakobyan will be in Tel Aviv.

Arman Akopian is expert in Oriental Studies, candidate of philological sciences. Author of Armenian textbook of Hebrew 'Modern Hebrew' (Yerevan, 2003), 'Classical Syriac' (Yerevan, 2005) , 'Introduction to Aramaic and Syriac Studies' (Yerevan, 2015). He is Fluent in English, French, Russian, Arabic, Hebrew, Portuguese, Latin. Since 2007 has a diplomatic degree of Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary.

Russia does not intend to return to “iron curtain”. Maria Zakharova

Save

Share

 21:41, 28 December, 2021

YEREVAN, 28 DECEMBER, ARMENPRESS. Russia does not intend to return to “iron curtain’ in the relations with the West, ARMENPRESS reports “RIA Novosti” writes, citing the announcement of the official representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia Federation Maria Zakharova.

Replying to the question if the Russian Federation will return to “iron curtain” in relations with the West, Zakharova answered. “We no”.

Tourism authorities eye potential markets as inbound figures show 50% lag against pre- pandemic year

Save

Share

 09:10, 29 December, 2021

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 29, ARMENPRESS. Tourism authorities in Armenia say the number of inbound tourists will pass 900,000 by yearend.

816,000 tourists visited Armenia in January-November 2021.

The First Vice Chairman of the Tourism Committee Artur Khachatryan told ARMENPRESS in an interview that while they are unhappy with the figures, the year 2021 was rather active for Armenia’s tourism sector.

“This year’s data isn’t finalized yet, but with November’s data we’ve had 816,000 inbound tourists. I think with December’s data we will pass the 900,000 threshold. If we compare it with the figures of the difficult period of 2020, we’ve had 50% growth. But comparing to the data of 2019 we are still 50% behind. We have things to do to reach the threshold of 2019 and move forward,” Khachatryan said.

Most tourists come from Russia, Iran, the United States, Germany, Georgia and France. Some other countries are considered as potential inbound tourism markets – the Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, Spain and Italy. Khachatryan says a marketing campaign is underway to promote tourism to Armenia in these countries. The promotion activities will continue in 2022.

Most tourists from Russia and Iran are interested in visiting the historical-cultural sites in Armenia, as well as “gastro-tourism” and “adventure-tourism”, Khachatryan said.

Artur Khachatryan said that their committee is developing a new bill for parliament’s approval aimed at regulating the tourism sector. He said they developed the bill not only as a result of studying international experience, but also given Armenia’s obligations assumed before the Eurasian Economic Union and the European Union.

The law will enable to ensure the quality of services and will introduce a registration system of tourism entities and operations, as well as a voluntary qualification procedure for enabling a more stable and competitive arena. Supervisory mechanisms are also envisaged.

 

Interview by Anna Gziryan

COVID-19: Armenian CDC reports 88 new cases, 5 deaths

Save

Share

 11:18, 29 December, 2021

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 29, ARMENPRESS. 88 new cases of COVID-19 were recorded in the last 24 hours, bringing the total cumulative number of confirmed cases to 344,737, the Armenian National Center for Disease Control and Prevention reported.

Total recoveries – 331,152 (+125)

Tests administered – 2,553,654 (+ 6788)

Total death toll – 7961 (+5)

Active cases – 4123

Longtime United States senator, former Democratic leader Harry Reid dies at 82

Save

Share

 11:20, 29 December, 2021

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 29, ARMENPRESS. Harry Reid, a former United States Democratic Senate leader who spearheaded epic legislative battles through three decades in Congress, has died at the age of 82, CNN reported citing a statement from his wife Landra Reid.

"I am heartbroken to announce the passing of my husband, former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. He died peacefully this afternoon, surrounded by our family, following a courageous, four-year battle with pancreatic cancer," she said in a statement Tuesday.

Reid rose from humble beginnings in Searchlight, Nevada, to become the most powerful politician in Nevada history, capping off his political career as the Democratic leader in the Senate, including eight years in the majority.

United States President Joe Biden, who served with Reid in the Senate, called him one of "the all-time great Senate Majority Leaders in our history" in a statement Tuesday.

"He was my leader, my mentor, one of my dearest friends," Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, said in a statement Tuesday evening. "He's gone but he will walk by the sides of many of us in the Senate every single day."

Former United States President Barack Obama released a letter he had written to Reid before his death in lieu of a statement. "I wouldn't have been president had it not been for your encouragement and support, and I wouldn't have got most of what I got done without your skill and determination," Obama wrote.

Putin sends New Year felicitations to Sarkissian

Save

Share

 11:34, 29 December, 2021

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 29, ARMENPRESS. Russian President Vladimir Putin congratulated Armenian President Armen Sarkissian on New Year and Christmas holidays.

“The Armenian-Russian relations are based on the good traditions of friendship, cultural and spiritual closeness,” Putin said in a message addressed to Sarkissian.  “I am sure that next year our bilateral allied partnership and constructive cooperation in various areas will continue to develop for the benefit of our brotherly nations and strengthening of regional stability and security.”

President Putin also wished “robust health, good luck and happiness” to President Sarkissian and his family, and “peace and welfare” to the citizens of Armenia, the Armenian presidency said in a statement.

As Biden signs NDAA, Congressman Pallone vows accurate documenting of Azeri-Turkish war crimes in Artsakh

Save

Share

 11:57, 29 December, 2021

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 29, ARMENPRESS. The National Defense Authorization Act that United States President Joe Biden signed recently includes important provisions aimed at holding Azerbaijan and Turkey accountable for the war crimes they committed in Artsakh, United States Congressman Frank Pallone said on Twitter.

“The NDAA that President Biden signed yesterday includes important provisions aimed at holding Azerbaijan & Turkey accountable for the war crimes they committed in Artsakh. I will push to ensure the required reports are accurate in documenting these crimes,” Pallone said.

What awaits the Armenia-Azerbaijan relations in 2022? [Azerbaijani Opinion]

Dec 30 2021

 

By

 Dr. Vasif Huseynov

Notwithstanding occasional flare-ups and infrequent deadly clashes, the past year marked a remarkably peaceful and promising period in the post-Soviet history of the Armenia-Azerbaijan relations. Meeting three times via the mediation of third parties, the leaders of the two countries discussed the ways for normalization of their relations and gave important peace messages. The regional situation has passed a long path from the notorious August-2019 speech of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan in Karabakh where he, in a populist manner, shouted “Karabakh is Armenia, period”.

The Sochi summit of the leaders on November 26 formalized the peace efforts of the sides over the last year where Armenia and Azerbaijan basically recognized their international borders and launched the negotiations on their delimitation and demarcation. In late 2021, Prime Minister Pashinyan’s reference to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions of 1993 as the inevitable legal basis for the talks about the status of the Karabakh region confirmed that the relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan have entered a qualitatively new stage. It is important to recall that the four resolutions adopted by the UNSC amidst the first Karabakh war, the international community recognized Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity with Nagorno-Karabakh being part of it. Referring to the content of peace negotiations between Baku and Yerevan during the rule of his predecessors, Pashinyan said that Karabakh’s status can only be determined within the constitution of the Republic of Azerbaijan.

This, along with the positive accomplishments in the talks over the unblocking of regional transportation and communication channels in line with the trilateral [Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Russia] ceasefire accord of November 10, 2020, has created an important ground to believe that 2022 promises more peace and security to the South Caucasus. On this account, the following predictions for the Armenia-Azerbaijan relations can be suggested for the upcoming year.

First and foremost, the format of negotiations is expected to remain as it has been since the latest war: i.e., the major decisions are likely going to be made within the trilateral format of the Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia leaders. Since the end of the 44 Day War, Moscow appears to be both supporter and guarantor of the agreements over the most conflictual issues between Baku and Yerevan and does not seem interested in losing its critical role in this process in the foreseeable future.

Along with that, there might be contacts and meetings between the leaders of the two countries mediated by other actors, for instance, the European Union. The Brussels summit of Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev and Prime Minister Pashinyan on December 14 demonstrated the EU’s capability to bring the two parties to the negotiating table and encourage them towards negotiated solutions to the existing disputes on their agenda. However, although the European Council President Charles Michel succeeded to facilitate a direct meeting of Aliyev and Pashinyan without the mediation of third parties, the regular direct contacts and meetings between them will take some more time to become possible.

Secondly, Baku and Yerevan are expected to announce the establishment of working groups for the delimitation of the Armenia-Azerbaijan border next year. According to the results of the Sochi summit, an international commission of the two countries is expected to be founded with the participation of Russia. The progress towards this end would further stabilize the border between Azerbaijan and Armenia and as such prevent the reoccurrence of violent escalations of 2021. The fact that this process is fully supported by all three countries is significantly important and promising for regional peace and security.

Third, Baku and Yerevan are likely to remain on a good track also in the negotiations over unblocking of transportation and communications in the region. The results of the past year provide a favorable basis for this process. It is worth recalling that the leaders of the two countries agreed on the opening of a railway between the western regions of Azerbaijan and its Nakhchivan exclave through the southern Armenian territories at the Sochi summit, after a long period of tug-of war. They have already prepared a timeline and estimated the costs for the reconstruction of this railway. The sides have, nevertheless, yet to reach an agreement about the technical details of a highway along that path which Azerbaijan calls “Zangazur corridor” with a reference to the historical name of the southern Armenian region. We can expect a breakthrough in this direction for next year. In parallel, Armenia is going to get railway access to Iran and Russia via the Azerbaijani territories which will create some degree of interdependency between Armenia and Azerbaijan providing more incentives for peacebuilding in the region.

Fourth, the 3+3 regional cooperation initiative, standing for Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia plus Russia, Iran, Turkey and proposed after the 44 Day War, is expected to become an active platform for the discussions and solutions of regional problems in 2022. A summit of the participating countries is possible if all the parties remain interested in this format. Although Georgia is not likely to decide joining this platform next year due to the country’s strained relations with Russia, Tbilisi will have to find a way for engagement with this group if it becomes a real geopolitical force in the region. The 3+3 regional grouping has such a potential as the participating countries are either already in friendly relations with each other or willing to build such relations soon. The rapprochement between Baku and Tehran after the recent tensions in their relations and the progress in the normalization of the Turkey-Armenia relations will make a good contribution to the 3+3 initiative, as well. Hence, this initiative could even serve as a useful platform for the normalization of the Russia-Georgia relations helping the sides resolve their conflicts peacefully.

What is more, the developments of the past year and the prospects for the upcoming year reaffirm that the liberation of the occupied territories of Azerbaijan in the 44 Day War of 2020 has created a unique chance for peace not only in the South Caucasus but also amongst the countries neighboring the region. We hope that it will finally be possible for the region to restore peaceful co-existence after the long years of conflicts and violence. This historic chance for peace should not be taken for granted and needs to be protected against the destructive forces that threaten to undermine the post-war peace process.