ECHR requests information from Azerbaijan on two captive Armenian servicemen

Save

Share

 12:24, 31 May 2023

YEREVAN, MAY 31, ARMENPRESS. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has made a decision based on Armenia’s application and requested Azerbaijan to provide information by June 6 whether the two Armenian servicemen kidnapped by Azeri troops are in Azeri custody as captives or any other status.

In the event of Azerbaijan confirming the detention of the two Armenian troops, the ECHR demanded Azerbaijan to provide information about their health and detention conditions, the Office of the Representative of Armenia for International Legal Affairs said in a statement.

Armenia requested on May 28 the ECHR to indicate interim measures to protect the fundamental rights of the two Armenian servicemembers.

Armenian Defense Minister, Kazakh ambassador and military attaché discuss cooperation

Save

Share

 12:34, 31 May 2023

YEREVAN, MAY 31, ARMENPRESS. Minister of Defense Suren Papikyan held a meeting on May 31 with the Ambassador of Kazakhstan to Armenia Bolat Imanbayev and the newly appointed military attaché of the Kazakh Embassy Colonel Yerulan Sapenov.

Papikyan congratulated the Colonel on his appointment , wishing him new successes in the responsible military-diplomatic mission, the defense ministry said in a readout.

The course of Armenian-Kazakh defense cooperation and directions for future expansion were also discussed.

A number of issues related to regional security were also discussed.

Selling Jerusalem: How secret land deals threaten the Armenian Quarter

May 31 2023

Alessandra Bajec
31 May, 2023

In-depth: Residents have voiced anger at the Armenian Patriarch for alleged land sales to Israeli investors in East Jerusalem, which they say could dramatically impact the historic character of the Armenian Quarter.

The reported involvement of Jerusalem’s Armenian Orthodox Church Patriarch, Archbishop Nourhan Manougian, in real estate deals in the Armenian Quarter has provoked outrage in the community and concerns about the erasure of its historic presence.

The deals, reportedly signed by the patriarch, involve the lease of a substantial number of Armenian properties to a Jewish Australian investor.

The land includes the Hadiqat Al-Baqar (The Cows’ Garden) and its surrounding properties, including the Qishla building in Bab al-Khalil (Jaffa Gate), located in the Armenian Quarter.

Reports first emerged of the deal in 2021, when a priest, Baret Yeretsian, the then director of the patriarchate’s real estate department, told Armenian media that land had reportedly been leased to businessman Danny Rubenstein for 99 years.

"It's a huge tract of land. By conceding it, they are erasing the Armenian presence historically, demographically, and culturally"

The priest said that the developer intended to build a luxury hotel in the sensitive area, located between the Armenian and Jewish Quarters, and that the land would then be returned to the Armenian patriarchate after the lease period ends.

In October of that year, 12 Armenian priests alleged that the deal was done illegally without ratification by the Synod and the General Assembly.

A year earlier, in 2020, reports that the Armenian patriarchate had struck an agreement with the Israeli Jerusalem municipality and the Jerusalem Development Authority to turn unused land into a parking lot, mainly for Jewish residents visiting the Western Wall, had raised suspicions about the scope of the deal.

Last month, these fears were heightened when the parking lot in the Armenian Quarter was taken over by a private company called Xana Capital. The land is thought to be part of the location for the purported hotel development.

The land deals have drawn strong criticism from the Armenian community. Three Armenian clubs in Jerusalem issued a statement last week demanding that the patriarch reveal the details of the contentious lease, revoke the disputed contract, and withdraw from all other promised deals regarding Armenian properties. Manougian has not yet issued a statement about how the sale will affect residents.

“It’s a huge tract of land. By conceding it, they are erasing the Armenian presence historically, demographically, and culturally,” Manuel Hassassian, the Palestinian Ambassador to Denmark, told The New Arab. As a Palestinian-Armenian diplomat, he has been acting as a consultant on the issue of leasing The Cows’ Garden estate.

The mishandling of the real estate fiasco prompted both the Palestinian Authority (PA) and Jordan to suspend Manougian from his role as the Patriarch of the Armenian Church in Jerusalem on 11 May. In a joint statement, they said that the patriarch ignored demands from Armenian institutions to stop any actions that could affect the historical and legal status quo of these historical sites.

The PA and Jordan asserted that, through his dealings, Manougian, who is responsible for Christian properties in the occupied Palestinian territories and Jordan, violated international covenants protecting the status quo of occupied East Jerusalem and preserving the Armenian Quarter, as well as the religious character of the city.

The site is an integral part of the Old City of Jerusalem, part of the territories occupied by Israel since June 1967, and to which a number of UN resolutions apply. The Old City is also recognised as part of the endangered World Heritage list, based on several resolutions issued by UNESCO.

Christians, who represent a slender two percent of the Israeli population, face heightened uncertainty due to land deals of this nature, which could result in a significant loss of property and therefore threaten the Christian presence in Jerusalem.

The controversial move is feared to alter the nature of the Armenian Quarter, which holds cultural and historical significance, and further diminish the Christian presence in the Holy City. The disputed land makes up roughly 25% of the current Armenian Quarter, which itself is about 14% of the Old City.

When members of the community learned about the long-term lease two years ago, they began to mobilise locally to publicly denounce what the Armenian patriarch and his real estate manager had done. Solidarity groups abroad have also supported the Armenian struggle in Jerusalem.

"We're very angry, we feel that we've been fooled. The only way to stop this deal is to reverse the contract in order to protect the Armenian Quarter"

Based on recently leaked information from sources, the plot of land in the deal currently hosts the parking lot, a seminary, five private homes, several shops, and a restaurant named ‘Bourghoulji’.

In the last three weeks, Armenians in Jerusalem have escalated their actions to try to repeal the agreement after they found out that it includes more land than originally thought.

Since the announcement by the PA and Jordan to freeze recognition of the patriarch, every Friday some 200 to 250 residents are holding protests in the square of the Armenian convent compound to decry the patriarch’s involvement in property agreements with Israeli investors, urging a withdrawal of the signatures to lease the lands of The Cows’ Garden.

“We’re very angry, we feel that we’ve been fooled,” Hagop Djernazian, a young Armenian activist in Jerusalem, told TNA, speaking out against the patriarchate. “The only way to stop this deal is to reverse the contract in order to protect the Armenian Quarter.”

The activist warned that the loss of Armenian land would potentially push locals to move out of their homes and force the school and community centres to close or relocate.

“We are fighting for our existence,” Djernazian said, speaking on behalf of Jerusalem’s Armenians.

Earlier in May, Archbishop Manougian defrocked the Armenian church’s former real estate director amid growing discontent in the community at the role that Yeretsian allegedly played in organising long-term leases of church property to Israeli developers.

The defrocking of Yeretsian was ordered shortly before the Jordanian-Palestinian decision to suspend their recognition of Patriarch Manougian. In response, the dismissed priest addressed a letter to the patriarch reiterating that the sale agreement was signed by the archbishop himself who refused to present it to the Holy Synod meeting for approval.

“It’s going to be very difficult for the patriarch to continue to ignore this pressure,” Daoud Kuttab, a Palestinian journalist and media activist, told TNA. “The problem is how much the Armenian population will be affected”.

Efforts to obtain details of the leases and revoke the contracts are also being made at a state level.

After writing letters to the Armenian Patriarchate in vain, a Palestinian committee led by Ramzi Khoury, the Palestinian Supreme Presidential Committee for Church Affairs, along with a Jordanian delegation, made an official visit to Yerevan in December 2021, where they met the Supreme Patriarch of all Armenians and raised the case.

As a result, a trilateral committee representing the Armenian, Palestinian, and Jordanian governments was formed to work on the file. Last week, the committee held a meeting in Amman to discuss options in seeking access to the land lease contract and the penalty for its cancellation.

Giving up the land has the potential not only to damage the diverse character of East Jerusalem but also to facilitate the expansion of the Jewish Israeli presence in the Old City, as the Armenian district is adjacent to the Jewish Quarter. Israel has long attempted to take over property in the Old City to weigh the demographics of the area in favour of Jewish Israelis.

This is why the PA and Jordan intervened in the matter, since the transfer of any land or properties in Jerusalem could grant Israel the prerogative to claim their ownership, which could, in turn, would modify the Old City’s demographic landscape.

"There is a constant effort by radical Jewish groups to obtain land and property in the Old City. This falls within the Judaisation (of Jerusalem) that's been going on for decades"

Hassassian, who was in charge of the Jerusalem file during the 2000 negotiations in Camp David, argued that any concession of Armenian church land would also “jeopardise” negotiations on a final status agreement regarding the city. Former Palestinian President Yasser Arafat refused to concede the Armenian Quarter to Israel in the Camp David negotiations.

Real estate transactions in the Armenian Quarter are part of Israel’s relentless expansionist occupation of the ancient city. If the Armenian district were to lose a quarter of its land, as is implied from the land sale deal, the Jewish makeup of the Old City would expand in a contiguous fashion from its own quarter to, and including, Bab al-Khalil (Jaffa Gate).

“There is a constant effort by radical Jewish groups to obtain land and property in the Old City. This falls within the Judaisation (of Jerusalem) that’s been going on for decades,” Kuttab said, noting that settler organisations are a driving force behind the many sale deals initiated by Israeli investors, which results in Jews taking over Palestinian properties.

Palestinian-Armenians in Jerusalem number between 2,000-3,000 in the Armenian Quarter. They are regularly harassed by far-right Israeli extremists in different ways, whether it is spitting, cursing, or pushing over Armenian clergy in the alleys of the Old City.

“We are increasing pressure, trying to corner the patriarch to rescind the lease contract and salvage the land so as to return it to the Armenian community,” reiterated Hassassian, who’s a member of the Armenian-Palestinian-Jordanian committee. “We are willing to cover the costs of the contractual penalty”.

The Palestinian negotiator anticipated that a committee of US lawyers is set to travel to Amman and then to Jerusalem next week to meet the trilateral committee as well as the Armenian patriarch.

Alessandra Bajec is a freelance journalist currently based in Tunis.

Overcoming the Challenges of Transitional Mobilization

May 31 2023

Tuesday, May 30, 2023 / BY: Suha Hassen;  Jonathan Pinckney

Nonviolent action can be a powerful way to bring about peaceful transitions from autocratic rule to democracy. But even when initially successful, movement leaders often face significant challenges, from frustrations that grievances are not addressed quickly enough to counterrevolutions aimed at restoring the authoritarian status quo. This report examines two recent transitions—the 2011 Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia and Armenia’s 2018 Velvet Revolution—and presents recommendations for improving the likelihood that change initiated through nonviolent action leads to robust and lasting democracy.

Political transitions that originate in nonviolent action campaigns are more likely to lead to democracy than transitions that originate through other means. Yet even political transitions that begin with this democratizing advantage face several challenges along the uncertain road to democracy. The organizers, activists, and political parties that unified to initiate the transition often face pressure to fragment into competing factions, a dynamic that can lead to outbreaks of violence. Previously independent civil society forces must decide whether and how to engage with the transitional government, which may deprive them of critical leadership and temper the transformative character of their demands. And actors across the political spectrum must balance retaining autonomy with accepting external support from foreign donors and aid organizations.

A growing literature and the examples of two recent cases, the 2011–2014 transition in Tunisia, the so-called Jasmine Revolution, and the 2018 transition in Armenia, the Velvet Revolution, serve to illustrate these challenges. While the details differ from case to case, an overarching finding is that the challenges, and hence their solutions, are embedded in the kinds of relationships activist movements develop internally and with civil society, the transitional government, and external actors. This schema provides a way for activists and supporters to understand better how to respond to and mitigate disruptions that could threaten the success of a transition, particularly preventing outbreaks of violence.

The actionable recommendations provided in this report emphasize excellent communication among the different actors, shared strategies for engagement among activist groups, and clarity in the roles external partners may play, all as means to improve the likelihood of achieving a robust and lasting post-transition democracy.

Among activists and civil society actors, the report recommends developing dense networks of communication, expanding tactical repertoires to include tactics that have lower risks of violent escalation, and pursuing contention through systematized, structured interactions that lower the stakes of any single political struggle. For the relationship between activists and transitional governments, the report recommends fostering a wide spectrum of civil society–government interactions, from confrontational to cooperative, to build the capacity of transitional governments to bring about political reforms while maintaining external accountability structures to ensure they will do so. Finally, for the relationship between civil society activists and international actors, the report emphasizes the importance of local autonomy and providing types of support (particularly training and convening) that allow local actors to be the primary drivers of transitional reforms.

Civic engagement and mobilization vary in political transitions that originate in nonviolent action, with ramifications for long-term peace and democracy. This report provides recommendations for resolving common challenges that arise during the transition period, drawing on insights from the 2011 Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia and the 2018 Velvet Revolution in Armenia. The report was funded through an interagency agreement between the United States Institute of Peace and the Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance Center at USAID.

Suha Hassen is a PhD candidate at George Mason University and a research analyst for the Nonviolent Action program at the United States Institute of Peace (USIP). Jonathan Pinckney is the director of applied research at the Horizons Project and a former senior researcher with the Nonviolent Action program at USIP.

The Wiretap: Spyware In Warfare

Forbes
May 31 2023

Spyware made by Israeli surveillance dealer NSO Group has turned up in some contentious situations in recent years, reportedly landing on the iPhones of associates of slain Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi and on devices of lawyers trying to get justice for the parents of murder victims in Mexico.

Now researchers say it’s been found on devices in the middle of a war between Armenia and Azerbaijan, who have spent decades fighting over the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region. Phones belonging to a number of former Armenian politicians and journalists were deemed to have been hacked by NSO’s tools, according to a group of nonprofits, including Access Now, CyberHUB-AM, Citizen Lab and Amnesty International. One victim — Anna Naghdalyan, then a spokesperson for Armenia’s foreign affairs agency — saw her phone hacked 27 times over a 10-month period from October 2020 to July 2021.

NSO said that it couldn’t comment on the specific allegations because it hadn’t received any forensic report from the researchers. It continues to claim to have high ethical standards.

What remains unclear is who ordered the hacks. Technical evidence provided no clues as to whether Armenia or Azerbaijan were responsible, according to victims and researchers who spoke with Forbes.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2023/05/30/the-wiretap-spyware-in-warfare/?sh=325ebe452405

Armenia and Azerbaijan Hold Continued Peace Talks

May 31 2023
Department of State

We are pleased to see that talks between Armenia and Azerbaijan have continued. As Secretary Blinken said, peace is achievable in the South Caucasus. We recently expressed appreciation for Prime Minister Pashinyan’s commitment to peace, and we welcome President Aliyev’s recent remarks on consideration of amnesty.

Armenia and Azerbaijan’s leaders will meet later this week in Chisinau with our European partners, and we hope that will be a productive step to resolving these issues at the negotiating table and not through violence. Aggressive rhetoric can only perpetuate the violence of the past; constructive dialogue-both public and private-can create peace, opportunity, and hope. The United States stands ready to support the efforts of both parties to conclude a durable and dignified peace agreement.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.

Problem won’t be resolved without Baku-Stepanakert dialogue, says Speaker of Parliament

 15:04, 1 June 2023

YEREVAN, JUNE 1, ARMENPRESS. Speaker of Parliament Alen Simonyan has said that direct dialogue between Nagorno Karabakh and Azerbaijan would also be highly important for Azerbaijan because if the dialogue fails to take place the problem won’t be resolved.

Asked whether the formation of an international mechanism for dialogue between Stepanakert and Baku is a principled matter for Armenia, given the fact that Azerbaijan doesn’t agree to it, Simonyan said: “We must reach a point where Azerbaijan starts to speak about it because otherwise there won’t be a beneficial situation for Azerbaijan itself, there will be a big gap which it won’t be able to fill for years, decades. If Azerbaijan doesn’t sit down and speak with the Armenian population living in Artsakh, that wound will someday [open].”

He added that international pressure and the international factor have big role. The Speaker said Armenia has success in this direction.

The problem won’t be resolved without dialogue between Baku and Stepanakert, Speaker Simonyan said.

“The other option is genocide, which we won’t allow. The Azerbaijani authorities should think that this issue is far more important for them than for us,” he concluded.

Speaking about a possible peace treaty, Simonyan called for guarantees to be in place for implementation of the terms of the agreement. As an example he mentioned the 9 November 2020 trilateral statement, which Azerbaijan is regularly violating while Russia – who is supposed to guarantee its implementation – fails to give proper response.

Speaker of Parliament presents Armenia’s red lines in talks with Azerbaijan

 15:15, 1 June 2023

YEREVAN, JUNE 1, ARMENPRESS. Armenian Speaker of Parliament Alen Simonyan has ruled out signing a peace treaty with Azerbaijan that would envisage Armenia’s sovereign territory to be less than 29,800 square kilometers. He also ruled out providing Azerbaijan with any corridor through territory of Armenia.

“We rule out signing a peace treaty with a territory less than 29,800 square kilometers. We have voiced the number of 29,800 square kilometers, the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia has drawn a red line from the National Assembly rostrum, and we brought the 29,800 square kilometers into the agenda. I can say the same about the corridor, we have numerously said that there won’t be a corridor, there can’t be such thing, we have excluded that narrative and drawn a red line for us,” Simonyan said at a press briefing.

Asked whether Armenia considers any specific international actor as guarantor for a peace treaty, Simonyan said that all centers that hosted the talks have expressed readiness to be guarantors.

“What we will get is another matter,” Simonyan said, adding that the possible guarantors should fulfill their functions. He said that he is not satisfied with the 9 November 2020 statement.  “I am not satisfied with the 9 November statement, and I am sure the people of Armenia are also not satisfied with it in terms of both the statements and actions of our partners,” Simonyan said.

PM Pashinyan arrives in Ankara for Erdogan’s inauguration

June 3 2023

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan arrived in Turkey on a working visit.

The Prime Minister is accompanied by the Vice President of the National Assembly of Armenia, the Special Representative of Armenia for the normalization process between Armenia and Turkey Ruben Rubinyan.

The Special Representative of Turkey for the normalization of Armenian-Turkish relations of the Turkish side, Ambassador Serdar Kilic, met the Armenian PM at Ankara’s Esenboga Airport.

Prime Minister Pashinyan will attend the inauguration ceremony of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Turkish Press: Armenian prime minister to attend Turkish president’s swearing-in ceremony

Yeni Safak, Turkey
June 3 2023
Armenian prime minister to attend Turkish president's swearing-in ceremony

Armenia's Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan will be attending the swearing-in ceremony of newly reelected Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Saturday, an announcement by Yerevan said.

"Armenia has received an offer to take part in the inauguration ceremony of Turkish President (Recep) Tayyip Erdogan. On June 3, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan will travel to Ankara to attend the inauguration," said a statement on Friday by the country's cabinet of ministers press service.

Erdogan won Sunday's presidential runoff election with 52.18% of the vote, while opposition candidate Kemal Kilicdaroglu received 47.82%, according to final results released by the country's Supreme Election Council.