AW: AUA embarks on capital expansion undertaking

YEREVAN—The American University of Armenia (AUA) has initiated groundbreaking efforts for the construction of the new Science and Engineering building and is now embracing a revised plan: the additional construction of the new Humanities and Social Sciences building and Arts building, along with an atrium that will connect all three buildings. The initial capital undertaking was expanded pursuant to magnanimous contributions by the Avedisian and Akian families earmarked for this ambitious endeavor. 

Expansion of the university’s physical space will enable AUA to appropriately respond to the growing demand for the excellent education it delivers and prevent the university from turning away highly-qualified students due to space restrictions. Possessing the qualifications for admission to competitive universities in other countries, many of these students who are turned away then leave Armenia to study abroad. With the University’s student population projected to significantly increase in the next five years, AUA is arduously involved in updating its curricula and preparing to introduce new degree programs in science, engineering, humanities, social sciences and the arts. 

In August 2023, AUA announced a $20 million gift from Pamela Wood Avedisian in honor of her late husband, Edward Avedisian, and his steadfast support for over 20 years as an AUA trustee, philanthropist and visionary. As part of this tremendous contribution, the new Edward and Pamela Avedisian Building will be dedicated to the humanities and social sciences, with the Paruyr Sevak Building to the arts program. “Edward was truly excited to see AUA grow and evolve over the past three decades and wanted us to contribute to that development. We both understood the need for expansion to further broaden the university’s offerings and fields of excellence,” said Pamela. 

Following this news, Zaven P. and his late wife Sonia Akian also announced their significant contribution of $9 million to name the new science and engineering building the Akian Family Building. Zaven expressed, “I had felt for a long time that AUA’s College of Science & Engineering needed physical expansion to facilitate the addition of new degree programs in other critical disciplines and state-of-the-art laboratories. I couldn’t ignore the financial need to make this a reality; I wanted to ensure that the college would be transformed into a fully-fledged quality STEM educational center in our homeland for generations to come.” 

Connecting all three new buildings and providing separate entrances will be an atrium called the Founders’ Atrium, which will also be used for various cultural, academic and other collaborative events. An important component will also be underground parking. 

Aligned with the academic disciplines to be housed in these buildings, the revised construction strategy reinforces the functionality of the two buildings to better meet the university’s growing enrollment numbers in the associated programs. 

The new buildings will include state-of-the-art classrooms, offices, science and engineering laboratories, conference rooms, auditoriums, art studios, music rooms and other functional spaces. Donors will also have the chance to leave their mark in the new buildings through various naming opportunities. A select group of steadfast supporters have already committed to naming facilities in the new buildings. In addition to the Akian and Avedisian families, these benefactors include Sarkis and Ruth Bedevian; Jack Munushian Charitable Trust, Gary R. Phillips and Zourab Bassmadjian, co-trustees; Paul and Kate Agbabian; Albert and Terry Bezjian; and Hagop and Iroula Manuelian. 

AUA initially launched its efforts for expansion through the Build a Better Future with AUA capital campaign solely for building a new science and engineering building. Now, with the revised construction strategy that includes the addition of two new buildings, along with the understanding that AUA plays a critical role in Armenia’s need to accelerate progress and innovation in science, technology and engineering as they relate to humanities, social sciences and the arts, the institution has set a goal of $50 million to successfully complete this ambitious undertaking. With over $30 million of the targeted amount raised from major and other donor funds, AUA continues to promote fundraising efforts to complete the capital campaign.

Initial planning for the new buildings’ construction is currently underway. The AUA Building Committee, chaired by President Emeritus Dr. Armen Der Kiureghian, has identified, interviewed and shortlisted architectural firms and selected Moore Ruble Yudell Architects & Planners for the project. Longtime friend and supporter of the university, Ronald Altoon, FAIA, LEED AP, president and CEO of Altoon Strategic consulting firm and former president of the American Institute of Architects, agreed to advise and provide guidance to the committee. At the same time, the university is appealing to the community, once again, to help raise the funds necessary to proceed with the planned expansion and to extend their support to ensure the sustained provision of the quality of education AUA aims to deliver in Armenia. 

For more information, visit https://babf.aua.am.

Founded in 1991, the American University of Armenia (AUA) is a private, independent university located in Yerevan, Armenia, affiliated with the University of California, and accredited by the WASC Senior College and University Commission in the United States. AUA provides local and international students with Western-style education through top-quality undergraduate, graduate, and certificate programs, promotes research and innovation, encourages civic engagement and community service, and fosters democratic values.


Cafesjian Center for the Arts announces “Seeking the House of the Deaf” educational program

YEREVAN—The Cafesjian Center for the Arts (CCA) has announced the launch of a new educational program: “Seeking the House of the Deaf.” 

The program is based on the exhibition, Sahak Poghosyan: Quinta del Sordo, on display at CCA  until April 28, 2024.

Sahak Poghosyan: Quinta del Sordo is a monumental project displayed at Eagle and Sasuntsi Davit Garden galleries of the Cafesjian Center for the Arts. It interweaves historical, conceptual, visual and artistic narratives․ The main goal of the educational program is to reveal these narratives.

In the first part of the program, participants will become acquainted with the exhibition. Then, the program will continue in the Creative Hall, where a presentation on Poghosyan’s Quinta del Sordo exhibition will be shown, drawing a connection between the works of old masters and contemporary works of art.

Summarizing the educational program, participants will engage in a discussion exploring the significance of artistic themes in the contemporary world.

The Cafesjian Center for the Arts continuously encourages participants to explore and express their passion for art.

This program is designed for participants ages 16 and up and is free with prior registration. 

For further information and registration, please call +374 10 54-19-32/34.

The Cafesjian Center for the Arts is dedicated to bringing the best of contemporary art to Armenia and presenting the best of Armenian culture to the world. Having celebrated its grand opening in November 2009, CCA continues to exhibit unique works of modern art, offers a wide variety of exhibitions and a diverse program of lectures, films, concerts and numerous educational initiatives for children and adults. Annual visitation of the Cafesjian Center for the Arts exceeds 1,000,000 people. The Cafesjian Center for the Arts is an institutional member of the International Council of Museums (ICOM).



RFE/RL Armenian Service – 01/22/2024

                                        Monday, 


Pashinian Ready For More ‘Guarantees’ To Azerbaijan

        • Robert Zargarian
        • Naira Bulghadarian

Russia - Azeri President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol 
Pashinian are seen during a visit to the Catherine Palace in St. Petersburg, 
December 26, 2023.


Armenia is ready to formally pledge not to have any territorial claims to 
Azerbaijan in the future, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian said over the weekend.

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev demanded such guarantees in early December, 
saying that an Armenian-Azerbaijani peace treaty would not be enough to preclude 
another war between the two countries. Aliyev did not elaborate on the 
safeguards against Armenian “revanchism” that would satisfy him.

Pashinian was understood to express readiness to meet this demand if Baku 
recognizes Armenia’s territorial integrity through that treaty “without any 
reservations.”

“We expect from Azerbaijan guarantees that Azerbaijan does not want to leave 
grounds, between the lines, for future territorial claims to Armenia,” Pashinian 
told senior members of his party in southeastern Vayots Dzor province. “We want 
such guarantees. But I must also say we are ready to give [Azerbaijan] such 
guarantees.”

“This should be a mutual action. It cannot be unilateral for us or for them,” he 
said.

Pashinian made the remarks one day after declaring that Armenia must adopt a new 
constitution reflecting the “new geopolitical environment” in the region. That 
was widely construed as a further indication that he wants to get rid of a 
preamble to the current Armenian constitution enacted in 1995.

The preamble makes reference to a 1990 declaration of independence adopted by 
the republic’s first post-Communist parliament. The declaration in turn refers 
to a 1989 unification act adopted by the legislative bodies of Soviet Armenia 
and the then Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast. It also calls for international 
recognition of the 1915 genocide of Armenians “in Ottoman Turkey and Western 
Armenia.”

Five lawmakers representing the main opposition Hayastan alliance issued a joint 
statement on Friday night condemning Pashinian’s plans for the new constitution.

“Pashinian is trying to launch a new attack on one of the pillars of the Third 
Republic of Armenia, preparing the ground for meeting another of the nonstop 
Turkish-Azerbaijani demands,” they charged.

Armenia - Opposition deputy Kristine Vartanian speaks during the government's 
question-and-answer session in parliament, April 13, 2022.

“What regional changes have left Armenia needing a change of its constitution?” 
one of those lawmakers, Kristine Vartanian, said. “The biggest change is the 
establishment of Azerbaijani control over Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh). 
[Pashinian] is openly telling us that our constitution must also reflect this 
reality.”

Pashinian recognized Azerbaijani sovereignty over Karabakh months before Baku 
recaptured the region as a result of the September military offensive that 
forced its population to flee to Armenia. The Armenian opposition says the 
recognition paved the way for the assault.

Vartanian and other signatories of the statement were recently allowed by the 
Armenian Foreign Ministry to read Azerbaijani proposals regarding the peace 
treaty currently discussed by the two sides. They said afterwards that Baku is 
seeking the kind of agreement that would leave the door open to future 
territorial claims to Armenia.

Some Armenian officials have made the same claims. Foreign Minister Ararat 
Mirzoyan spoke on January 10 of “some regression” in the Azerbaijani position on 
the treaty.

Earlier this month, Aliyev renewed his demands for Armenia to open an 
extraterritorial corridor to Azerbaijan’s Nakhichevan exclave. He also demanded 
Armenian withdrawal from “eight Azerbaijani villages” and again dismissed 
Yerevan’s insistence on using the most recent Soviet maps to delimit the 
Armenian-Azerbaijani border.

Pashinian on January 13 said Aliyev’s demands amount to territorial claims to 
Armenia and accused Baku of undermining prospects for the signing of the peace 
accord. Still, a few days later, he expressed hope that Azerbaijan is committed 
to making peace with Armenia. He went on to make the latest overtures to Baku.




EU Cocerned About Azeri ‘Territorial Claims’ To Armenia


European Union foreign policy chief Josep Borrell, right, speaks with Belgium's 
Foreign Minister Hadja Lahbib during a meeting of EU foreign ministers in 
Brussels, .


The European Union on Monday expressed serious concern at what its foreign 
policy chief described as territorial claims to Armenia made by Azerbaijani 
President Ilham Aliyev.

“We agreed that Azerbaijan needs to return to substantive peace and 
normalization talks with Armenia,” Josep Borrell said after chairing a meeting 
of the foreign ministers of EU member states that discussed the 
Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict among other issues.

“The latest territorial claims by President Aliyev are very concerning, and any 
violation of Armenia’s territorial integrity would be unacceptable and will have 
severe consequences for our relations with Azerbaijan,” he told a news briefing 
in Brussels.

Earlier this month, Aliyev renewed his demands for Armenia to open an 
extraterritorial corridor to Azerbaijan’s Nakhichevan exclave. He also demanded 
Armenian withdrawal from “eight Azerbaijani villages” and again dismissed 
Yerevan’s insistence on using the most recent Soviet maps to delimit the 
Armenian-Azerbaijani border.

Borrell issued the same warning to Baku in November as the EU decided to deploy 
more observers to Armenia’s volatile border with Azerbaijan. The 27-nation bloc 
launched the monitoring mission in February 2023 with the stated aim of 
preventing or reducing ceasefire violations there.

Aliyev twice cancelled talks with Pashinian which the EU planned to host in 
October. Azerbaijan’s Foreign Minister Jeyhun Bayramov similarly withdrew from a 
meeting with his Armenian counterpart scheduled for November 20 in Washington. 
Baku accused the Western powers of pro-Armenian bias. It now wants to negotiate 
with Yerevan without third-party mediation.




Government Moves To Allow Minority Rule In Armenia

        • Ruzanna Stepanian

Armenia - Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian chairs a weekly cabinet meeting in 
Yerevan, February 9, 2023.


Armenia’s prime minister and their cabinet should no longer necessarily enjoy 
the backing of the parliamentary majority, according to constitutional reform 
proposed by the country’s Minsitry of Justice.

The current Armenian constitution requires the government to have a “stable 
majority” in the National Assembly, meaning that the prime minister has to be 
backed by most parliament deputies. It envisages a second round of voting in 
cases where up to three parties or blocs fail to form a majority government as a 
result of a general election.

A reform “concept” submitted by the Ministry of Justice to Prime Minister Nikol 
Pashinian’s office earlier this month would the abolish this requirement and 
make it much easier for a political force winning the plurarity of votes to come 
to power. It claims that “stability can cause political and economic stagnation.”

The document obtained by RFE/RL’s Armenian Service on Monday proposes two ways 
of forming a minority government. One option is for the largely ceremonial 
president of the republic is to appoint the leader of the political force that 
won most votes but fell short of a parliamentarity majority as prime minister.

Alternatively, the parliament itself would pick the premier through a plurality 
voting system. A similar system is already in place in Yerevan. It enabled 
Pashinian’s Civil Contract party to install its top candidate as mayor following 
municipal elections held in September.

In what is widely considered a serious setback, Civil Contract fell well short 
of an absolute majority in the city council empowered to appoint the mayor. The 
ruling party capitalized on opposition contenders’ failure to quickly agree on a 
common mayoral candidate.

Armenian opposition groups refrained from commenting on this proposed 
arrangement, saying that they have not yet seen the Ministry of Justice 
document. At least some opposition figures are bound to say that Pashinian is 
simply trying to make sure that he can cling to power despite a serious decline 
in his popularity.

Pashinian said Armenia must have a new constitution when met with senior 
Ministry of Justice officials late last week. Commenting on the wisdom of such a 
change, he made no mention of domestic politics and cited instead the need to 
ensure country’s “external security” in the “new geopolitical environment” in 
the region.

Pashinian has repeatedly called for constitutional changes and made conflicting 
statements about them during his nearly six-year rule. Two years ago, he set up 
a new body tasked with coordinating the constitutional reform process. The body 
now headed by Justice Minister Grigor Minasian has still not drafted any 
constitutional amendments. It is not clear whether it approves of the document 
put forward by Minasian’s ministry.




Russian-Armenian Arms Supply Issues ‘Mostly Settled’

        • Shoghik Galstian

Russia - Military vehicles move toward Red Square to attend a Victory Day 
military parade in Moscow, May 9, 2023.


The Armenian Defense Ministry signaled on Monday significant progress in the 
implementation of multimillion-dollar defense contracts signed by Armenia and 
Russia after the 2020 war in Nagorno-Karabakh.

In a short statement to RFE/RL’s Armenian Service, the ministry said that 
“contentious issues” with Russian arms manufacturers have been “mostly settled.” 
Some of those issues remain unresolved, though, it added without giving any 
details.

The statement did not explicitly refer to the contracts for the delivery of 
Russian weapons worth $400 million, according to Armenian officials. The latter 
repeatedly complained last year that the Armenian military has still not 
received any of those weapons.

Two senior Armenian lawmakers revealed earlier this month that Russia has 
shipped the first batch of that military hardware. But they did not specify the 
types of weaponry commissioned and/or received by Yerevan.

Russia’s ambassador to Armenia, Sergei Kopyrkin, acknowledged late last month 
“issues” in the implementation of Russian-Armenian arms deals. He implied that 
Russian defense companies have not fulfilled their contractual obligations on 
time because of having to manufacture more weapons for the Russian military 
embroiled in the continuing war with Ukraine.

Russia has long been Armenia’s principal supplier of weapons and ammunition. The 
South Caucasus nation has acquired them at domestic Russian prices, set below 
international market-based levels, and even for free.

With no end in sight to the war in Ukraine and tensions between Moscow and 
Yerevan continuing to grow, the Armenian government is increasingly looking for 
other arms suppliers. Since September 2022 it has reportedly signed a number of 
defense contracts with India worth at least $400 million. In October 2023, it 
also signed two arms deals with France.



Reposted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2024 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

 

Zangezur Corridor Dispute Threatens Armenia-Azerbaijan Peace Talks

Jan 19 2024

  • Azerbaijan demands a corridor through Armenia to connect with Nakhchivan, which Armenia finds unacceptable, affecting the peace process.
  • The issue of demarcation and delimitation of borders remains unresolved, with Azerbaijani troops occupying some Armenian territories.
  • Armenia and Azerbaijan are at odds over who should mediate their talks, complicating efforts to reach a peace agreement.

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has called Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev's latest remarks about border delimitation/demarcation and transit links "totally unacceptable" and a "blow" to the peace process. 

"I promise a financial reward to anyone who finds the term 'Zangezur corridor' in the November 9 agreement," Pashinyan told a group of MPs on January 13. 

It was an ironic reference to the Azerbaijani side's contention, reiterated recently by Aliyev, that the provision on opening transit links in the Russian-brokered peace accord that ended the 2020 Second Karabakh War stipulates a seamless corridor through Armenia connecting mainland Azerbaijan and the Nakhchivan exclave, without Armenian border or customs checks. 

That idea is referred to in Azerbaijan as the "Zangezur corridor" and Baku has pushed for it with varying degrees of intensity since the 2020 ceasefire. Early last year it seemed to back down on the demand in the context of the peace talks. 

In early October, shortly after Azerbaijan's lightning offensive to seize the whole of Nagorno-Karabakh, the corridor project seemed to be off the table after ground was broken on an alternate route through Iran.  (Tehran, like Armenia, is vociferously opposed to the Zangezur corridor idea.)

The issue, which has long inspired Armenian fears of an Azerbaijani invasion, is now back on the agenda, as Aliyev said in a January 10 interview that if the corridor was not opened, "Armenia will remain in an eternal deadlock. … If the route I mentioned is not opened, we will not open our border with Armenia anywhere else. So they will do themselves more harm than good."

In October last year, the Armenian prime minister introduced an initiative called "Crossroads of Peace" aimed at regional cooperation. That proposal includes linkages between mainland Azerbaijan and Nakhchivan with Armenian border and customs checks. Azerbaijan has dismissed it out of hand as "PR." (According to the 9 November 2020 agreement that ended the Second Karabakh War, the route linking mainland Azerbaijan Nakhchivan is to be monitored by Russian border troops.)

Exclaves and villages

Elsewhere in his January 10 interview, Aliyev demanded the return of enclaves and border villages that have been under Armenian control since the First Karabakh War three decades ago. 

Pashinyan seemed to back the idea of an exchange of enclaves, with a "mutually agreed map" as part of the process, but said that if Azerbaijan demanded the return of eight villages, Armenia would "raise the issue of 32." 

That was a reference to several bits of former Soviet Armenian territory that have similarly been controlled by Azerbaijan since the first war, as well as to the territory inside Armenia, estimated to total about 215 square kilometers, that Azerbaijani troops have occupied following several incursions between May 2021 and September 2022. 

Armenia and several Western states have demanded the withdrawal of Azerbaijani troops from Armenian lands. But Baku has refused, citing the lack of demarcation of the borders as justification. 

And Aliyev said explicitly he had no intention of withdrawing them in his January 10 remarks. "We are not taking a step back because that border must be defined. However, our location, which is currently disputed by Armenia, does not include any settlement."

The delimitation and demarcation of state borders between Armenia and Azerbaijan, as well as the opening of transport links, remain the most contested issues between the two countries following Azerbaijan's takeover of Karabakh in September. The border commission working on the delimitation and demarcation issues held its latest meeting late last year and the next one, according to Aliyev, is to be held this month, with the question of the border villages in the Gazakh region of Azerbaijan being on the agenda.

Although the principles of a peace deal were said to be agreed upon in November, the sides seem to have dismissed each other's draft proposals for the peace agreement. 

Additionally, the sides disagree on who should mediate the talks. Yerevan opposes Moscow's mediation, while Baku has turned down EU or US-initiated talks in recent months. 

In December, the two countries managed to issue a joint statement and agree on a prisoner exchange, but they do not have a clear plan to continue the bilateral talks.

By Ani Avetisyan via Eurasianet.org

Armenia’s Constitutional Reform: A Genuine Effort or Political Maneuver?

Jan 20 2024

By: Hadeel Hashem

In a move that has sparked widespread skepticism, the government has announced the formation of an advisory committee to instigate a nationwide consultation on constitutional reform. This decision is viewed by many as a political maneuver, rather than a sincere effort towards change, given the history of numerous consultations, commissions, and studies already conducted on the topic.

Over the years, an array of ideas and recommendations for necessary reforms have been proposed, all of which are yet to be implemented. The Prime Minister’s recent announcement, therefore, seems untimely and unlikely to effect actual constitutional changes before the next election in 2025. This is due to the extensive processes required, including policy formulation, parliamentary study, and the necessity for a super-majority for passage.

Moreover, there are pressing matters in need of legal reform affecting constitutional rights, such as campaign-finance reform, a promise made by the current administration that remains unfulfilled. In light of this, the recommendation is not to start from scratch, but to focus on specific, non-controversial issues that can be addressed without a comprehensive overhaul.

Such low-hanging fruits include establishing term limits for prime ministers, setting fixed election dates, ensuring judiciary funding independence, and revising the process for appointing a police commissioner. All these are considered achievable goals that, if implemented, can bring about significant change without the need for a complete constitutional revamp.

CHRISTMAS GREETINGS TO THE ARMENIAN PATRIARCHATE

Jerusalem Patriarchate [of the Greek Orthodox Church]
Jan 20 2024

On Saturday morning, January 20, His Beatitude Patriarch Theophilos III led a delegation from the Jerusalem Orthodox Patriarchate to the Armenian Patriarchate, to exchange Christmas greetings. His Beatitude’s speech was as follow:

Your Beatitude, dear Archbishop Nourhan,
Your Eminences,
Your Graces,
Beloved Members of our Respective Brotherhoods,
Dear Fathers,

Christ is born!
Glorify him!

We greet you warmly, Your Beatitude, and the members of your Brotherhood, as you celebrate the Feast of the Nativity of the Divine Logos in the Church of the Nativity. This is a time of deep joy, and we recall the words of the hymnographer:

O Bethlehem, receive the Mother of God:
for she has come to you to give birth to the Light that never sets.
Let everything that has breath praise the Maker of all.
(From Mattins of the Forefeast of the Nativity)

As we keep the Christmas feast of joy, hope, and light in this time of darkness in our region and in our world, we must not refrain from appropriate rejoicing. For the Light that the darkness can never overcome has come into the world (cf. Jn 1:5), and this great feast renews our faith and trust in the God who comes to share our humanity in all its fullness.

Our spiritual mission that has been entrusted to us by Divine providence is to remain focussed always on this message of hope, especially when hope seems elusive. There is no doubt that at this present time in human history the human family is facing some of its greatest challenges, and our region is no exception. For we are under particular pressure here in the Holy Land, where so many innocent victims suffer and where so many are displaced from their homes and their lands. As we are fully aware, the Christian community is also confronted by the impact of the conflict, and there has never been a time when our shared commitment to our spiritual mission here has been more urgent.

Just as we are keeping the Christmas feast, which is the feast of God’s solidarity with us, we wish to take this opportunity to express our solidarity as well with you and your community in the face of the pressures you are bearing. The situation that you face is not simply an issue for the Armenian community alone; indeed it is an issue for the whole Christian community. We recall the words of Saint Paul, If one member suffers, all suffer together with it; if one member is honored, all rejoice together with it (1 Cor. 12:26). We are committed to remain united in our resolve to defend the integrity of the Christian character of Jerusalem and the Holy Land.

We assure you, Your Beatitude, of our firm support in your endeavours to protect the patrimony of the Armenian patriarchate. As Saint Paul encourages us, we are to bear one another’s burdens, and in this way…fulfill the law of Christ (Gal. 6:2). We are deeply concerned at the ongoing harassment that the Armenian community is experiencing in the matter of the Cow’s Garden, and we pray for a swift resolution to these problems and the restoration of normal life for the Armenian community.

On this occasion we would like to offer our congratulations for your newly ordained bishops, and we also wish to express once again our condolences at the recent passing away of the late Archbishop Aris, who was a faithful servant of the Armenian Church and of the Christian community of the Holy Land. May his memory be eternal.

In this difficult season for the world and for our region, we must renew our resolve not to let anything distract us from our pastoral and spiritual mission to guard and protect the Holy Places and to serve and support the Christian presence here. Nothing is more important than this. We are to be vigilant for those who cause divisions among us and put obstacles in our way that are contrary to the Gospel (cf. Rom. 16:17). Let this be our special care so that we may always join our efforts and maintain our united front against those who wish to rend the multi-cultural, multi-ethnic, and multi-religious fabric of our society.

In this blessed season of the Prince of Peace, we renew our appeal for peace and for a humanitarian ceasefire so that the innocent victims of the present conflict may receive the essential help and care that they so desperately need. And we encourage the authorities of our region and of the world to do all in their power to bring a swift end to this conflict, prevent any escalation, and engage in a process of dialogue that will lead to lasting and robust peace and security for all our peoples.

As we keep this holy season, Your Beatitude, we pray that the Light that shines from the Holy Grotto of Bethlehem will illumine the darkness of this present time, and enlighten the hearts and minds of all to seek peace and pursue it (Ps. 34:14).

Christ is born!
Glorify him!

Armenia And Iran: A Vital Strategic Partnership – Analysis


Jan 21 224


“The Islamic Republic of Iran supports the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Armenia,” Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian said at a press conference on December 27, congratulating the Armenian people for the New Year and Christmas on behalf of the Iranian government and parliament.

“Iran has historical relations with neighboring Armenia, which continue to develop, deepen and reach a high level day by day. We held important talks with my Armenian colleague and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan about the necessity of establishing permanent peace in the South Caucasus and the role of Iran in that process, which can be a guarantee of stability and peace. We have a common opinion on various issues of cooperation”, added the Iranian Foreign Minister.

Thus, the strategic partnership between Iran and Armenia, which is becoming stronger every year, was once again highlighted. Although Iran is a Muslim Shiite country where the Sharia system is in force, and the Republic of Armenia is the only Christian country in the wider area of the Middle East, in the last three decades, a combination of specific historical and geopolitical circumstances has gradually created an important partnership that has a great impact on the geopolitical picture of Middle East and Caucasus.

Armenian-Iranian relations have a thousand-year history and they can be described by peculiar phrases that some analysts state: “one civilization, two nations”, “one civilization, two states” and “one civilization, two religions”. Contacts between Persia and ancient Armenia date back to the Median Empire and the 6th century BC. The territory of modern Armenia was part of Qajar Iran until 1828, when it was forcibly ceded to the neighboring Russian Empire as a result of Iran’s defeat in the Russo-Persian War of 1826–28 and the Turkmenchay Agreement. Until the collapse of the USSR in 1991, Armenia remained under Russian control.

Tehran and Yerevan have enjoyed cordial relations since Armenian independence. The 44-kilometer-long Armenian-Iranian border is one of the oldest in the world and a symbol of friendship between the two nations. Today, there are no territorial disputes between the two countries. The Armenian minority in Iran, one of the largest and oldest communities in the world, enjoys the official recognition of the Iranian state and is the strongest minority community in the country. It has between 120,000 and 150,000 members, mostly in the capital, Isfahan, and in the northwest of the country.

The Armenian community is the largest Christian community in Iran, ahead of the Assyrian. Armenians have two representatives in the Iranian parliament and are the only minority with official observer status in the Expediency Discernment Council (decides whether laws conform to Sharia law). Many of the oldest Armenian churches and monasteries are located inside Iran, such as the Monastery of St. Stepanos, Monastery of St. Thaddeus and Chapel of Dzordzor. All objects are under the protection of UNESCO. Parthian and Persian had a huge influence on the Armenian language, which included many Parthian and Persian expressions.

During the First Nagorno-Karabakh War in the early 1990s, Iranian President Akbar Rafsanjani led the peace initiative. Thanks to Iranian efforts, negotiations between the two sides were held in Tehran in May 1992, but despite the agreement, peace efforts failed when Armenian troops captured the city of Shusha and Lachin in the same month. Although Iran has consistently asserted Azerbaijan’s sovereignty over the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh, in practice it has discreetly supported Armenian secessionists. This led to the split between Iran and Azerbaijan and the alliance between Iran and Armenia. Tehran chose Armenia because of the fear of Azeri irredentism towards Iranian Azerbaijan and pan-Turkism, which are phenomena that are a threat to Iran.

In addition to the important Iran-Armenia gas pipeline that was completed in 2006, the two countries have also implemented other large projects, such as the construction of two hydroelectric plants on the Aras River. During 2014, Iranian and Armenian energy ministers agreed to build a new transmission line from Armenia to Iran in line with efforts to strengthen energy ties. In June 2015, both countries agreed to begin construction of a third transmission line. In January 2021, Iran and Armenia signed a Memorandum of Understanding to expand trade relations. Trade between the two countries in 2021 amounted to 471 million USD. Armenian trade with Iran is equal to Azerbaijan’s trade with Iran. Despite the bad relations between Tehran and Buku, Iranian-Azerbaijani trade has grown in recent years.

Economic cooperation between Yerevan and Tehran is not a matter of choice, but a matter of necessity in difficult times. Bilateral trade is important for both countries because of their security. Iran is under Western sanctions and Armenia is under a trade blockade by Turkey and Azerbaijan since gaining independence in 1991. The Azeri explanation for the blockade is a territorial dispute over Nagorno-Karabakh, while the Turkish blockade has no explanation other than the obvious hatred of the Armenian people, as demonstrated by the Turkish genocide of the Armenians in 1914-1918. The only open borders of Armenia are with Iran and Georgia. If they were closed, Armenia would be completely isolated from the rest of the world. The Turkish blockade forces Armenia to rely on the Iranian transport network. Since Armenia’s export economy relies on agriculture and manufacturing, trade corridors through Iran are crucial.

An important goal of Iranian-Armenian cooperation is to reduce Armenia’s energy dependence on Russia. The two countries agreed in August to extend an existing agreement under which Armenia supplies Iran with electricity in exchange for natural gas supplies. This arrangement has been in place since 2009 and was due to end in 2026, but will continue, in an improved form, until at least 2030. However, the deal can be disrupted by Russia if it chooses because of Armenia’s turn towards the West and Prime Minister Pashinyan’s efforts to establish a better relations with the USA and the EU.

Armenians fear that the Russians could close their gas pipelines and that is why they want Iranian gas. Namely, the Iran-Armenia gas pipeline, which is intended to be used to reduce Armenia’s dependence on Russian gas, has been under the concession of the Russian gas giant Gazprom since 2015. Russia has the option of limiting the pipeline’s potential. Even during the design of the pipeline, Moscow insisted that its diameter be limited to 700 millimeters (down from the originally planned 1,420 millimeters) – to ensure that excessive amounts of Iranian gas are not resold to third countries. This technical modification limited the volume of the gas pipeline to 2.3 billion cubic meters per year. In the event that Western sanctions against Iran are lifted, Armenia would be a transit country through which Iranian oil and gas flow to Europe.

In order to facilitate trade, the key cross-border highway that passes through the southern Armenian province of Syunik is currently being reconstructed. In October, the Armenian government awarded a $215 million contract to two Iranian companies (Abad Rahan Pars Iranian International Group and Tunnel Sadd Ariana) to do the work. When the reconstruction is completed, the highway will allow driving from the Armenian village of Agarak, on the Iranian border, 32 kilometers further to the north of Armenia through mountainous terrain over 17 bridges and through two tunnels.

“Armenia can play a key role within the North-South road corridor. I hope that the project will be implemented quickly”, said the Iranian Minister of Transport and Urban Development, Mehrdad Bazrpash. Iran and Armenia also discussed the construction of a new border bridge. The existing bridge on the Armenian-Iranian border was built in 1995 over the Aras River.

Bazrpash highlighted Armenia’s potential to access foreign markets through infrastructure projects in Iran’s regions on the Caspian Sea. He highlighted the strategic position of Iran as a transit route to facilitate the movement of Armenian goods. Iran will soon start trading with Armenia, Russia and Belarus in the national currency, the Iranian rial. The two countries have developed tourism cooperation in both directions.

Just five days before Azerbaijani troops launched a military operation to end Armenian rule over Nagorno-Karabakh on September 19, 2023, the US acting assistant secretary of state, Yuri Kim, told the US Senate Foreign Policy Committee: “We will not tolerate any attack on the people of Nagorno-Karabakh.” Yet the Biden administration tolerated. After the Azerbaijani victory and the flight of 100 thousand Armenians, the State Department did nothing more than condemnation. The reason is that the United States is mostly concerned with the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. Azerbaijan’s lightning military action created a fait accompli. In addition, the geopolitical orientations of Azerbaijan and Armenia are different. Although Azerbaijan is an authoritarian non-democratic state, it is oriented pro-Western and pro-Israel, while Armenia, although a democratic state, is traditionally oriented pro-Russian and pro-Iranian. However, in recent years, since 2018, the pro-Western government of Nikola Pashinyan has started to turn towards the West and move away from Russia while maintaining good relations with Iran.

Iran was and remains a vocal supporter of the protection of Armenian minority rights in Azerbaijan. Iranians have condemned the flight of 100 thousand Armenians from Nagorno-Karabakh after the Azeri takeover of that region. “We believe that the rights of the people of Karabakh should be ensured. The rights of every person from Karabakh should be ensured. They must have the opportunity to exercise their rights. This is a reality that no one, including Azerbaijan, can ignore,” said Mehdi Sobhani, Iran’s ambassador to Armenia, in his recent interview. Although the ambassador did not reveal that Iran has any special policy towards Karabakh Armenians, the mere mention of Karabakh drew the ire of the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry. Despite the nice words, Iranian diplomacy did not save the Karabakh Armenians who were under the 9-month economic blockade of the Lachin Corridor, nor did the Iranian Armed Forces intervene when the Azerbaijani offensive began.

Azerbaijan’s victories in the war with the Armenians in 2020 and 2023 brought new challenges for Armenia and Iran. The most important challenge is the growing influence of Turkey in the South Caucasus, which poses a threat to both countries. The Erdogan administration is pursuing neo-Ottoman and pan-Turkish policies with the aim of creating a Greater Turkey in the form of political control. Such expansionist Turkish foreign policy seeks to gather under the control of Ankara Turkish states from Azerbaijan to Central Asian states such as Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan. That is why the Organization of Turkish States was founded in 2009.

Although for now official Baku and Ankara avoid mentioning the north of Iran inhabited mostly by Azeris (Iranian Azerbaijan), in their long-term plans there is a clear intention to make that territory part of the Turkic world. Azeris live in Iranian provinces (East Azerbaijan, Ardabil, Zanjan, West Azerbaijan) and in smaller numbers in other provinces: Kurdistan, Qazvin, Hamadan, Gilan, Markazi and Kermanshah. Iranian Azeris also form a significant minority in Tehran, Karaj and elsewhere. There are between 12 and 23 million of them in Iran and they make up 16% of the population, which is more than the population of Azerbaijan – 10 million.

Although they have not yet rebelled against Tehran, the Azeris may do so as they are not satisfied with their position. Baku often does not hide the support it provides to various terrorist groups inside Iran with the aim of destabilizing it. In this regard, ISIL’s terrorist attack on the Shah Cheragh Mosque in Shiraz in October 2022 with links to Baku should be mentioned.

Azerbaijani irredentism implies aggressive politics and military actions aimed at dismembering the internationally recognized territory of the Republic of Armenia after Azerbaijani formations took control of Nagorno-Karabakh. This leads to the so-called of the Azerbaijani Zangezur Corridor. The imagined corridor is a threat to both Armenia and Iran.

After the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War in 2020, the Azerbaijani army occupied large parts of its border with Iran. Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev then again started talking about the desire to establish a transport corridor from the main part of the Azerbaijani territory through the southern part of Armenia (Syunik province) to the Azerbaijani exclave of Nakhichevan. The corridor was designed to be exempt from Armenian sovereignty, without Armenian checkpoints, with the aim of connecting the “Turkish world”. It is a classic example of Erdogan’s neo-Ottoman politics. But Tehran proposed an alternative.

In early October, the Iranians started building a bridge that would allow faster transit between the main territory of Azerbaijan and Nakhichevan through Iranian territory, thus eliminating the need for a corridor through Armenia. The Zangezur Corridor would cut through Armenia and isolate Iran from Armenia, which would not benefit both countries. At the same time, it would be a blatant violation of the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Armenia. Such ideas are rejected by almost all foreign governments except Turkey.

In the regional conflict and proxy war of Iran and Israel, besides Israel using Azerbaijan as an important ally, Iran uses Armenia. Iran wants to use its good relations with Armenia to harm Israel in certain ways on a regional level. In addition to the conflict with pro-Israel Azerbaijan, one of them is the Iranian air corridor through Armenia to Lebanon and Syria.

Iran’s intelligence service Quds Force (Jerusalem Force) conducts military-intelligence operations in Armenia with the aim of transporting weapons and military equipment and information warfare. After Iranian airlines were exposed in 2018 as arms and personnel carriers for the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and related organizations in Syria and Lebanon, the Armenian airline Flight Travel LLC was founded with the same intent. Iranian military commanders, weapons and equipment were often transported from Afghanistan and Pakistan via Armenia to Lebanon and Syria. Such activities are a thorn in Israel’s side.

There are also disagreements. The interests of Iran and Armenia diverge when it comes to the presence of extraregional actors in the South Caucasus, including negotiations between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the status of Nagorno-Karabakh and the thawing of their Cold War relations. Armenians are in favor and Iranians are against.

Iranian Foreign Minister Amir-Abdollahian was explicit on this issue when he recently stated: “The presence of foreigners in the region not only does not solve problems, but complicates the situation.” Yerevan wants the US and the EU to mediate in solving outstanding issues with Baku, while Tehran would like the problems to be solved exclusively by regional powers. In line with this regional principle, Iran welcomed the 2021 initiative to establish a 3+3 format for talks that would include the three South Caucasus states (Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia), and three neighboring regional powers – Iran, Russia and Turkey. Several meetings in the 3+2 format (Georgia never agreed to participate) have already taken place, the last on October 23 in Tehran, but little progress has been achieved.

Due to the rapprochement with the West, Armenians try to carry out their trade with Iranians as much as possible in exchange of goods – for example, “electricity for gas”. The West’s intention is to deny Iran cash. Despite the developed relations, Armenians do not buy weapons from Iranians. Armenians turned to India for weapons and military equipment. There is also no significant money laundering between the two countries. Armenia follows the path of Cyprus in suppressing such activities. Despite enormous pressure from Tehran, Armenia did not reject the Iranian dissidents. While Turkey returns Iranians to the Islamic Republic, Armenia has established itself as a safe haven for dissidents seeking salvation in Europe or America. In addition, all Western intelligence services are currently operating in Armenia, and most often they are focused on spying on Iran. They do this mostly freely without interfering with Armenian structures.

Security should form the basis for continued Iranian-Armenian relations in the future. The two countries could establish a joint military-political alliance that would have joint military forces consisting of parts of the Iranian and Armenian armies. The troops of the Iranian-Armenian alliance could jointly intervene if the security of a state was threatened. It is unlikely that Azerbaijan or Turkey would attack Iran, but a Turkish or Azerbaijani attack on Armenia should not be ruled out considering the increased appetites of Baku and Ankara and the inefficiency of the international community, especially in the Caucasus region.

In addition to external invasions, the Iranian-Armenian military-political alliance should conduct anti-terrorist operations against terrorist groups. Such operations could be managed by a joint supreme headquarters. The two countries should continue to improve economic cooperation through certain economic integration, thus laying a solid foundation for strengthening their own security. In any case, Armenian-Iranian relations should continue to deepen in the economic, military, scientific, cultural and sports fields.

Matija Šerić is a geopolitical analyst and journalist from Croatia and writes on foreign policy, history, economy, society, etc.

https://www.eurasiareview.com/21012024-armenia-and-iran-a-vital-strategic-partnership-analysis/

Garo Paylan: A Voice for Peace Amid Rising Armenian-Azerbaijani Tensions

Jan 20 2024

In an era where war cries often drown out the voices of peace, one man, Garo Paylan, an ethnic Armenian member of the Turkish parliament, stands resolute against the waves of hostility. Paylan has taken a bold stance, publicly criticizing the Turkish government’s war propaganda tied to the ongoing military operations by Azerbaijan against Armenia and Artsakh.

The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, a bone of contention between Armenia and Azerbaijan, has seen tensions rise to an alarming level. Despite global pleas for a ceasefire and peaceful resolution, the region is teetering on the brink of war. Paylan, representing the Peoples’ Democratic Party, has consistently voiced concerns over this escalation, accusing the ruling Justice and Development Party and the Nationalist Movement alliance in Turkey of promoting a militaristic stance.

Paylan argues that the governing parties in Turkey have been making hostile statements against Armenia instead of advocating for a ceasefire and negotiations. He believes that this war-centric approach will bring substantial harm to both Armenian and Azerbaijani people. Seventy-one Azerbaijani soldiers have reportedly been killed in recent days due to provocations by Armenia, underlining the escalating human cost of this conflict.

Paylan warns that the Turkish leadership’s militaristic policies are thrusting the nation and the region into a precarious situation. Advocates for peace, like himself, are being suppressed and sidelined. Despite the risks and the prevailing narrative, Paylan remains resolute in his mission to promote peace. He calls upon individuals and organizations to join in opposing war and striving to maintain peace, reflecting the belief that dialogue and understanding can triumph over hostility and violence.

https://bnnbreaking.com/politics/garo-paylan-a-voice-for-peace-amid-rising-armenian-azerbaijani-tensions/

Reviving Heritage: The ‘In the Mountains’ Festival in Armenia

Jan 20 2024

By: Momen Zellmi

In the picturesque setting of Tatev, Armenia, on June 24 and 25, the echoes of history and legends will come alive during the immersive festival ‘In the Mountains’. The festival, an initiative designed to boost cultural and gastronomic tourism in Syunik, is a vibrant celebration of the region’s history and legends. The event, meticulously crafted, offers a multitude of experiences, including theatrical performances, master classes, music, national dances, and games, along with a taste of traditional dishes.

Tours of historic old villages are also on the itinerary, allowing visitors to immerse themselves in the region’s cultural heritage. Among the highlights of the festival is the opportunity to experience the TaTever aerial tramway over the Vorotan gorge and the Tatev monastery complex from the 9th century. The latter, a spiritual haven accessible by the Wings of Tatev cable car, offers breathtaking views of the gorge. Notably, the TaTever aerial tramway holds the Guinness World Record for the longest passenger aerial tramway.

Under the leadership of Sisian Boghossian, the Tourism Committee of the Republic of Armenia has been instrumental in organizing the festival, underlining its role in attracting tourism to Armenia in four main directions: adventure, culture, gastronomy, and nature. The festival’s potential to boost tourism and provide socio-economic benefits to the community has also been highlighted by Ani Davtyan, the project manager. The festival is supported by the Tourism Committee of the Ministry of Economy of Armenia and organized by Tatev Revival Foundation, Ruben Vardanyan Foundation, Impulse Management Company, and TaTever aerial tramway.

Unique features of the festival include an interactive performance titled ‘History of Syunik. travel through time’, a crafts fair, and musical performances. A dedicated children’s entertainment zone ensures the event is family-friendly, while the ‘Medieval dinner with the noble Orbelian family’ offers an intriguing gastronomic experience. These initiatives are part of the ‘Tatev Revival’ Foundation’s focus on restoring the Tatev Monastery and developing the region. As such, the festival is more than just a celebration; it’s a testament to Armenia’s commitment to preserving and promoting its rich cultural heritage.

Jerusalem: Armenian Christians fight controversial land deal

BBC. UK
Jan 21 2024

While Christmas may be a distant memory for many, the Armenians of Jerusalem only just held their annual celebration on 19 January.

This year, the holiday was overshadowed by the war in Gaza and the ongoing threat to the survival of the community from a deeply controversial real estate deal.

Many spent the day in an unconventional fashion, joining a sit-in at a tent in their church car park, which is part of a large plot at risk in the Armenian Quarter of the walled Old City.

"This illegal, treacherous land deal actually brought us all together," says Setrag Balian, a ceramicist turned activist.

Armenians date their presence in the holy city back to the 4th Century. Many of the 2,000-strong community live inside the large, cobble-stoned compound of St James Convent.

In the past, they have often been divided by political differences and family fights and there have been rifts between Jerusalemite Armenians and their Church leaders who act as employers and landlords for many.

Yet for two months, local Armenians and priests have all been staying in a large, improvised tent here, around-the-clock, to try to block the development going ahead. They eat here and work shifts as guards behind a makeshift barricade decorated with Armenian flags.

Together, they say, they have seen off attacks by contractors with bulldozers, armed settlers and masked thugs.

  • Controversial land sale angers Jerusalem Armenians
  • Jerusalem Christians say attacks on the rise

"Everything was put in danger with this deal," Setrag says. "Whoever wants to take away our rights and endanger our presence and our lives here, we will stand up against them and defend our rights till the end."

Last April, facts began to emerge about a 2021 contract secretly signed between the Armenian Patriarch and a Jewish Australian-Israeli developer. It gave a newly-created firm, Xana Gardens, a 98-year lease to build and operate a luxury hotel in an area known as the Cow's Garden.

The deal covered a plot of 11,500 sq m, abutting the ramparts of the south-western corner of the Old City, with an option to take over an even bigger area.

It includes the car park, some church buildings and the homes of five Armenian families, accounting for about 25% of the Armenian Quarter.

Located on Mount Zion, it has huge religious significance and is incredibly valuable real estate but an annual fee of just $300,000 (£237,000) was to be paid by the developer.

"For that amount you could barely rent yourself a couple of falafel shops in the Old City," commented one Armenian using the car park, who asked for his name not to be used.

Amid heated protests by locals and a decision by Jordan and the Palestinian Authority to withdraw their recognition of the patriarch over his role in the deal, pressure grew on the Church to cancel the contract.

Meanwhile, an international team of Armenian lawyers came to investigate and give advice.

The patriarch claimed he had been tricked by a trusted priest who was later defrocked. He finally announced a formal move to cancel the deal in October.

At that point, tensions between Armenians and representatives of the developer – whose workers had forcibly taken over the car park – began turning into direct confrontations.

When Israeli bulldozers arrived at the contested site to try to begin demolition, Armenians rushed to block it. The next month, there were claims of intimidation as the developer arrived with several armed men.

Further attempted incursions came after the protest tent was set up. The most violent was last month when masked men came to the car park beating people with sticks and using tear gas. A priest, Father Diran Hagopian, broadcast events on Facebook Live.

"They were shouting, 'you should go out from this land'," he later told the BBC. "One of their leaders was shouting: 'You can break their legs, you can even kill them, but they should leave.'"

The apparent involvement of known Jewish settlers in attacks alongside other evidence has increased long-held suspicions that a powerful settler organisation is involved in the attempted land takeover.

Ever since Israel captured the Old City and its holy sites from Jordan in the 1967 Middle East War, Jewish investors in Israel and overseas have sought to buy properties to try to cement Israeli control over occupied East Jerusalem.

Palestinians want this part of the city as the capital of their hoped-for future state. Jewish Israelis view the whole of the city as their eternal, undivided capital.

Researchers at the Israeli non-profit organisation Ir Amim, which is focused on the Israel-Palestinian conflict and supports the diversity of Jerusalem, are worried about developments in the Armenian Quarter.

"This is close to sensitive places," says Aviv Tatarksy. "Creating a settlement in this area is part of very far-reaching aims of settler organisations who basically want to Judaise completely the Old City, with their eyes on the Temple Mount or al-Aqsa Mosque."

The settlements built in occupied territory are seen as illegal under international law, although Israel disagrees.

The BBC has contacted the developer behind Xana Gardens several times but not heard back.

The now-defrocked American priest who coordinated the deal, Baret Yeretsian , was surrounded by a mob of angry young Armenians shouting "traitor" as he exited St James Convent last year, assisted by Israeli police, before moving to Southern California.

He has since denied to journalists that the developer has any political or ideological agenda, describing such accusations as "propaganda" based on his Jewish identity.

The Armenian Church has now begun proceedings through the Israeli courts to challenge the validity of the contract for the Cows' Garden.

As locals gathered around a brightly lit Christmas tree in their makeshift tent last week, they remained resolute but were aware that their legal fight could easily take years.

Whether incursions can be stopped in the meantime remains to be seen.