Armenian Christmas Celebrations Reinforce Cultural Identity at Sts. Vartanantz Church Mourad School

Jan 17 2024

By: Momen Zellmi

In a heartwarming celebration of heritage and unity, the Sts. Vartanantz Church Mourad Armenian School in Providence, R.I., marked Armenian Christmas on January 6, 2024, with a vibrant array of spiritual and cultural activities. The day commenced with a Christmas Badarak and the Blessing of the Water ceremony. Notably, 7th grade students, clad in traditional Armenian attire, recited the Havadamk (Nicene Creed), a testament to the school’s commitment to preserving their cultural legacy.

The day’s highlight was the honor bestowed upon Matt Burke, recognized as the Godfather of the Holy Cross during the ceremony. The religious services were followed by a Christmas Hantes (recital) held in the Aramian and Fermanian Halls, which drew an enthusiastic crowd of approximately 180 guests, including students and their parents.

Emphasizing the significance of retaining Armenian identity and heritage, Co-Directors June Mangassarian and Lala Attarian underscored the role of education and community initiatives. They brought attention to the Sister School program with the “Nor Oughi” school in Armenia, an endeavor designed to foster connections between the students and their ancestral homeland.

The Mourad School Committee Chairman, Hagop Khatchadourian, spoke on the importance of nurturing future leaders and educators within the Armenian community, resonating with the proclamation of 2024 as the “Year of Human Resources Preparation” by His Holiness Catholicos Aram I. Khatchadourian also heralded the upcoming 90th anniversary of the Mourad Armenian School, marking a significant milestone in its history.

The event reached its crescendo with performances by the students, including melodious songs and a piano solo. Santa’s presence, distributing gifts donated by local organizations and individuals, added an even more festive air to the celebration. The event wrapped up with Rev. Fr. Kapriel Nazarian expressing appreciation for everyone’s involvement. The Ladies’ Guild and the Men’s Club prepared a veritable feast for the guests, with the day’s success owing much to the generous contributions from local businesses and community members.

EU Warns Azerbaijan over President Aliyev’s Claims and Statements on Armenian Territory

ATLAS NEWS
Jan 16 2024

By: OurWarsToday
EU Warns Azerbaijan Over Territory Claims:

The EU has issued several statements including warnings to Azerbaijan that diplomatic relations will be severely injured if President Aliyev carries out his proposed plan of taking control of eight Armenian villages, as well as plans to create an extraterritorial corridor to the Azerbaijani Nakhichevan exclave, an Azerbaijani claimed autonomous republic, to the west of Southern Armenia.

European Commission spokesperspn Peter Stano speaking to Armenpress said: “The European Union has spared no diplomatic efforts to help reach a mutually acceptable settlement of the conflict over the past few years… We have been in close contact with the Armenian and Azerbaijani leaderships, tirelessly reiterating our support for the sovereignty, territorial integrity of both countries and the resolution of issues exclusively by peaceful means. Our communication channels remain open… The EU has been using every opportunity to pass clear messages to Azerbaijan that any violation of Armenia’s territorial integrity would be unacceptable and will have severe consequences for our relations… We remain firm and steadfast in this stance… The President of the European Council Charles Michel, the High Representative /Vice-President Josep Borrell and the EU Special Representative Toivo Klaar continue their engagement for a sustainable and lasting peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan,”

Azerbaijan’s Justification and Intentions:

Azerbaijani leader Illham Aliyev made these threats in recent territorial claims where-in he said Armenia must give control of the villages which he calls as Azerbaijani instead of Armenian, as well as designate land between the exclave and Azerbaijan so as to create a corridor for goods supply. Additionally he seeks to prevent Armenian goods inspection on Nakhichevan cargo back and forth.

Aliyev’s backing for these claims was that under Soviet Azerbaijan these areas were delineated to their nation, Soviet borders were redrawn between Armenia and Azerbaijan several times and neither side has accepted the various choices for decades. All eight villages claimed exist on or near the border, and one next to Nakhichevan. Aliyev said in a speech on January 10th: “As for the occupied Azerbaijani villages, there are enclave and non-enclave villages. The villages that are not enclave, the four villages should be returned to Azerbaijan without any preconditions. The villages that are enclave, a separate expert group should be established and this issue should be discussed. Azerbaijan believes that all enclaves should be returned. The roads leading to these enclaves should have the necessary conditions and the people living there should be accommodated in these enclaves… Azerbaijan is not going back anywhere. Neither from the positions of May 2021 nor from the positions of September 2022. Azerbaijan is not taking a step back because that border must be defined… Armenia continues to occupy Azerbaijan’s villages, and this is unacceptable. This issue will be clarified during the meeting of the commissions at the end of this month [January of 2023].”

Aliyev also announced new and planned Azerbaijani infrastructure and city building projects in the recently seized Artsakh/Nagorno-Karabakh region.

Background and Regional Conflict:

In recent years when Azerbaijan has made similar demands and claims for Armenian territory which is not met, it follows with an invasion that seizes the land by force utilizing its larger military force and population to brute strength attacks and hold frontlines that have steadily grown, such as the recent seizure of the enclave of Artsakh/Nagorno-Karabakh. Supply by Turkey and Israel to Azerbaijan of advanced military technology and armaments such as drones has enabled them to swiftly strike Armenian defenses and vehicles before sending in ground troops to overwhelm thinned out positions and then occupy them.

Armenia’s Energy Security Faces Frosty Relations With Russia – Analysis

Jan 17 2024

By IWPR

By Gayane Markosyan

Armenia’s strained relations with Russia, its traditional strategic ally, may have an impact beyond political and security alliance, affecting the country’s energy security as Moscow supplies most of Yerevan’s gas needs.

Armenia is officially considered a self-sufficient country in terms of its volume of electricity, generating up to 98 per cent of its needs in-country. Experts, however, warn that the reality is more complex.

“Our self-sufficiency depends on the countries from which we import the gas and the uranium that operate our thermal and nuclear power plants. And when our government officials speak about our self-sufficiency, why do they forget to say how we maintain it?” energy expert Armen Manvelyan told IWPR, noting that in fact over 70 per cent of Armenia’s electricity depended on Russia.

According to Armenia’s statistical committee, in 2021 thermal power produced 42.9 per cent of the country’s electricity, while 25.4 per cent was provided by nuclear plants with uranium imported from Russia. Internal resources produce about 31.6 per cent of Armenia’s electricity: 27.9 per cent from hydropower and 3.7 percent from solar power plants. 

In addition, Armenia imports natural gas and oil for most of its energy needs, predominantly from Russia. According to data from the Ministry of Territorial Administration, Russia supplies 87.5 per cent of Armenia’s gas needs via pipeline through Georgia, while Iran covers 12.5 per cent through a barter agreement under which it exports electricity in exchange.

Armenia also trades electricity with Georgia, though volumes are low since the countries’ networks are not synchronised. Energy interconnections with Azerbaijan and Turkey are inactive for political reasons.

In an interview on November 15, Iran’s newly appointed ambassador to Armenia, Mehdi Sobhani, hinted that Tehran might help Yerevan reduce its energy dependence on Russia. Since 2009 Armenia has provided Iran with electricity in return for natural gas supplies; the arrangement was due to end in 2026, but in August the two countries agreed to extend and expand it until at least 2030. Russia, however, could turn the tap off as gas giant Gazprom owns the pipeline bringing the gas from Iran to Armenia.

According to the Statistical Committee of Armenia, in 2021 natural gas accounted for 76.2 per cent of imported energy resources and oil products for 21.9 per cent.

Armen Manvelyan, an energy expert, noted that amid the strained relations with Russia in the wake of the situation in Nagorny Karabakh, this dependency was problematic. 

“Armenia is not in the best energy situation right now,” he continued. “Yes, the nuclear power plant is working, thermal power plants are working, but their activities depend on the energy resources supplied from Russia. And if their prices increase, Armenia may face serious problems.”

While a spike in prices is not imminent, the widening rift between Yerevan and Moscow meant that it cannot be ruled out.

“Until now, the existing favourable tariffs were determined by the quality of political relations between the two countries,” Manvelyan said. “If you have good political relations, you get a good price. When you start to spoil your political relations, the situation may become dicey and prices may increase.”

Other experts are more optimistic.

“I think that the problems associated with the dependence on Russian gas are not as acute and existing issues can be mitigated by diversifying the country’s energy system, for example developing further nuclear and solar energy,” Avetisyan told IWPR, adding that supplies from Russia and Iran were mutually beneficial. 

“In the case of Iran, this is done within the Gas for Electricity scheme, while in case of Russia, we buy the gas, we do not receive it as a gift.”

Manvelyan noted that rates were certainly lower for Yerevan. 

“Armenia pays Russian gas at a low price, 175 dollars per 1,000 cubic metre while Azerbaijan sells gas to its ally Turkey at 290 dollars,” he said, adding that Armenia was short of options in terms of friendly neighbours and should hence “make every effort to ensure good relations with Russia”. 

“An increase in gas prices will trigger a chain reaction across the country’s economy as prices of our goods will increase, affecting our export opportunities because our products will become uncompetitive,” he concluded.

To increase its self-sufficiency, the Armenian government has embarked on a path to liberalise the energy market as a way to boost its electricity export capacity and diversify sources. 

“We support the government of Armenia in implementing reforms in the energy sector. We are working with the Armenian government in three main areas – liberalisation of the electricity market, diversification of energy supplies and development of interstate trade with Georgia,” said Abgar Budagyan, chief of party at Tetra Tech, which implements USAID’s energy programme in Armenia.

For Prime MInister Nikol Pashinyan, the gradual liberalisation of the electricity market which started in 2022 has opened up new opportunities and created favourable conditions for interstate trade. 

“We are developing production capacities, carrying out large-scale reconstruction of substations and power lines, and building Armenia-Iran and Armenia-Georgia high-voltage lines, which contribute to the formation of the North-South Electricity Corridor and create new opportunities for increasing exports, imports, transit or seasonal power exchange. Thus, Armenia can become a kind of regional electricity hub,” he said in June. 

The open market means that consumers can choose an electricity supplier, depending on the offered tariffs. It also means that the Electric Networks of Armenia (ENA) no longer has the monopoly over the electricity supply, although new suppliers still have to use ENA’s distribution network, meaning that the company remains the only guaranteed distributor.

“Since the introduction of the new market model, the Commission approved the licence for 14 suppliers and seven wholesalers are already operating,” Sergey Aghinyan, a member of the Public Services Regulatory Commission, told IWPR.

According to official statistics, in the first six months of 2023, 13.1 per cent of consumers chose new electricity suppliers, up from 5.3 per cent in the whole of 2022. The government forecast the share to reach 23 per cent in 2024. 

Experts and officials noted that the reform contributed to the development of interstate imports and exports.

“In 2022, Armenia exported 365 million kWh to Georgia; in 2012-2021 the amount remained constant at 242 million. This happened mainly because of market liberalisation,” Vardanyan said. Iran remained the main recipient of Armenia’s electricity, with 1178.3 million kWh of electricity supplied in 2022. 

But experts remain divided over the benefits of liberalisation. Avetisyan’s assessment one year on is positive as it is “an important process that provides opportunities for free competition for existing market players not only within the country, but also abroad”.

Manvelyan maintained that authorities should have strengthened state control rather than open the market.

“Energy is one of the few industries that should be very seriously controlled by the state, it is the only one in the position to build large systems and high-voltage networks,” he said. “If Armenia were a large country, we could also talk about the private sector, but this is not the case of our country.”

  • About the author: Gayane Markosyan is a Yerevan-based investigative journalist whose work focuses on gender, legal and economic issues.
  • Source: This publication was published by IWPR and prepared under the “Amplify, Verify, Engage (AVE) Project”implemented with the financial support of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Norway.
https://www.eurasiareview.com/17012024-armenias-energy-security-faces-frosty-relations-with-russia-analysis/

Sports: Carl Greaves trained Newark based when in the UK fighter, Armenian boxer and European welterweight champion David Avanesyan…

UK – Jan 17 2024

 By Rob Currell

Armenian boxer and European welterweight champion David Avanesyan who trains in Newark under Carl Greaves was back in the country for his latest fight.

Avanesyan fought former Olympian Serge Ambomo at The Eastside Roads in Birmingham where he won via a stoppage in the fourth round.

The two men had previously fought in 2017 when Avanesyan won on points over the Cameroonian boxer.

"He is currently fourth in the world with the WBC and he has to fight at least every 12 months or he would lose his ranking.

"We have been promised big names and big fights after the defeat against Terrance Crawford but another big fight has not happened.

"So we decided to fight Serge on a low profile, small hall fight and David got the victory.

https://www.newarkadvertiser.co.uk/sport/avanesyan-beats-former-olympian-in-birmingham-bout-9348916/

Opinion: Can BRICS be Armenia’s salvation?

Jan 17 2024

When economist Jim O’Neill, then working at Goldman Sachs Group Inc., coined the term BRIC in 2001 to draw attention to solid growth rates in Brazil, Russia, India, and China, few may have anticipated that two decades later, this term will be the buzz word shaping the global geopolitics. In 2010, BRIC became BRICS after South Africa joined the club, but even then, many were sceptical that a grouping of such diverse countries can play a meaningful role in global politics.

However, as China transformed itself into a global economic heavyweight, and Russia – West relations hit their lowest point since the end of the Cold War as the result of the Russia – Ukraine war, scholars, experts, and politicians started to actively discuss the emergence of a new, multipolar world order, viewing BRICS as one of its pillars.

The next milestone in the development of the BRICS was the 2023 summit in South Africa, when Argentina, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates were invited to become members of the group as from January 1, 2024. Subsequently, the newly elected President of Argentina, Javier Milei, withdrew the country from its planned entry into the BRICS, but other newcomers officially became members of the organization on January 1, 2024.

Iran's membership in BRICS brought the organization to Armenia's doorstep, making Yerevan a neighbour of BRICS. Currently, Armenia is in the painstaking process of re-assessing and re-evaluating its foreign policy after the defeat in the 2020 Nagorno Karabakh war, the military takeover of the self-proclaimed Nagorno Karabakh Republic by Azerbaijan in September 2023, and the forced displacement of all Armenians from the region. Some in Armenia hoped that after finishing with Nagorno Karabakh, Azerbaijan would sign a peace agreement with Armenia based on the recognition of mutual territorial integrity within the 1991 Soviet administrative borders, and on the restoration of communications accepting the sovereignty of states over the routes passing their territories. In December 2023, some high-level Armenian officials, including the Speaker of the National Assembly, stated “that the peace with Azerbaijan was never as close as now.” 

However, this positive mood changed significantly after President Aliyev's January 10, 2024, interview with local media outlets. President Aliyev clearly stated that Azerbaijan would not withdraw from at least 200 square km of Armenian territory, which it controls as a result pf incursions into Armenia in May and November 2021, and September 2022, and demanded passport and customs-free passage to connect Azerbaijan with Nakhijevan via Armenia, otherwise vowing to continue the blockade of Armenia. He rejected the possibility of establishing the institute of guarantors for the future Armenia – Azerbaijan agreement and Armenia's offer to accept the Soviet Union Armed Forces General Staff 1975 maps as a base for future delimitation and demarcation. He demanded that either maps of 1918-1920 or the early Soviet period (1930-1940s) should be used, adding that after the 1940s, several thousand square km of Azerbaijani lands were transferred to Soviet Armenia, and the fate of these territories should be discussed during the delimitation and demarcation process. On January 13, 2024, Prime Minister Pashinyan mentioned that Aliyev’s statements were a severe blow to the peace process.

What if the Armenia – Azerbaijan peace agreement is not be signed in the foreseeable future? In that case, Armenia needs quick actions to raise its capacities and capabilities to deter potential new Azerbaijani attacks. It is a challenging task, as the military takeover of Nagorno Karabakh has put the Southern part of Armenia (Vayots Dzor and Syunik regions) in an extremely vulnerable situation. They are sandwiched between Azerbaijan proper and Nakhijevan Autonomous Republic, while the narrowest part dividing the two is around 25 km, and the widest part is only 42 km. Deterring Azerbaijan, which has the full support of Turkey, cannot be based only on military power, and it should also include the development of cooperation with external powers who have an interest in keeping Armenia within its current borders. In this context, the membership of Iran into the BRICS, and the "arrival of BRICS" to Armenia's doorstep is another opportunity for Armenia.

Within Armenia's renewed efforts to diversify its foreign and economic policy, India, UAE, and Saudi Arabia are among the top destinations. They are now members of the BRICS; all have complicated relations with Turkey, and are not interested in seeing the additional expansion of Turkish influence into the South Caucasus. The same applies to Iran, a new BRICS member, which, in the last three years, has sent multiple signals to Azerbaijan and Turkey that it would not tolerate the establishment of an extraterritorial corridor via Armenia to connect Azerbaijan with Nachcivan and Turkey. Then we have Russia, which, due to the war in Ukraine, needs Azerbaijan and Turkey for diversification of logistics, circumventing Western sanctions, and other reasons, but simultaneously, is not interested in seeing more Turkish influence in the South Caucasus and Central Asia. China is not an active player in the South Caucasus yet, but Beijing also has no interest in seeing more Turkish influence in Central Asia, including through the mechanisms of the Organization of Turkic states, and China and Russia are also BRICS members. Egypt has its problems with Turkey, stemming from Turkish support to the Muslim Brotherhood and longtime nonrecognition of President el-Sisi government. The restoration of diplomatic ties in the Summer of 2023 did not solve all problems, as was indicated by the postponement of the July 27, 2023 el-Sisi visit to Turkey. So, Russia, China, India, Iran, UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt, albeit for different reasons, are not interested in seeing Turkish dominance over the South Caucasus, and they are all BRICS members.

Armenia should carefully look into ways to expand its cooperation with BRICS member states, first of all in the economic area, inviting BRICS investments into the infrastructure and other projects in Armenia. Armenia is in active discussions with Iran, India, and UAE to bring their investments into Armenia, and there is potential to have Chinese involvement through the Belt and Road Initiative. The possibility of receiving funding from the BRICS New Development Bank for various projects, which can be implemented by BRICS member companies, should be studied, too. As the first step, the Armenian government should establish an interagency task force to develop and present in Autumn 2024 a concept for Armenia – BRICS cooperation. Another step should be organizing an international expert conference in Armenia (preferably in the Syunik region) on Armenia- BRICS cooperation in June or September 2024. Meanwhile, as a preparatory action, a webinar on this topic with the participation of think tanks from Iran, India, Russia, China, UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt can be organized in April or May 2024. The participation of Georgian Think tanks in the webinar will add more value to the event.

After the loss of Nagorno Karabakh and continued policy of pressure and blackmail by Azerbaijan, Armenia faces tough years ahead. The establishment of multilateral cooperation with BRICS member countries and with the organization itself can be one of the effective ways to diversify Armenian foreign and economic policy, increase Armenian deterrence capacities and capabilities, and ensure stability and security in the South Caucasus.         

International Experts to Gather at Conference Addressing Key Armenian Issues

Jan 17 2024

By: Momen Zellmi

A pivotal two-day conference endorsed by His Holiness Catholicos Aram I is slated for January 19 and 20, 2024, at the Catholicosate of Cilicia in Antelias. The event, part of the ‘Analysis and Awareness Platform’ (AAP) initiative, plans to host experts from Armenia, Artsakh, the U.S., South America, France, Switzerland, and Lebanon to discuss several critical issues concerning Armenia and the region.

The conference will address a range of topics, including confronting Azerbaijan’s historical distortions, strategizing for the freedom of prisoners of war and kidnapped Artsakh political leaders, and rallying international support for the protection of Artsakh’s spiritual and cultural legacy. The event seeks to shed light on legal methods for the repatriation of Artsakh’s indigenous people and analyze the regional political dynamics.

Several notable experts will be gracing the conference with their presence. These include Prof. Ashod Melkonian, Prof. Rupen Safrasdian, Dr. Armen Maroukian, Dr. Vahram Palayan, Dr. Hrayr Balian, Dr. Khatchig Der Ghougasian, Tigran Yegavian, Dr. Vicken Cheterian, Dr. Nora Bayrakdarian, Mr. Shahan Kandaharian, and secretary Aharon Shekherdemian. Their collective expertise will enrich discussions and contribute to the formulation of strategies to address the issues at hand.

Amid the backdrop of the conference, Armenia is grappling with a host of other geopolitical issues. These include the plight of Armenians displaced from Nagorno-Karabakh in September 2023, the negotiation process with Azerbaijan, and the need to strengthen regional communications. The Armenian President has been in discussions with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Filippo Grandi, outlining the government’s efforts to address these problems. The President also attended the inauguration of the new Argentinian President Javier Milei, meeting with leaders of the local Armenian community.

Armenia’s focus on developing relations with the states of the Arab Gulf is highlighted by the recent meeting with the delegation from the United Arab Emirates. The country is also eyeing stronger ties with the European Union, as evidenced by the discussions surrounding the implementation of the CEPA. The Crossroads of Peace project, aimed at establishing connections between various Gulf and Sea regions via a single regional railway network, is another significant initiative by Armenia.

Azerbaijan revives demand for corridor through Armenia

eurasianet
Jan 17 2024
Ani Avetisyan Jan 17, 2024

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has called Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev's latest remarks about border delimitation/demarcation and transit links "totally unacceptable" and a "blow" to the peace process. 

"I promise a financial reward to anyone who finds the term 'Zangezur corridor' in the November 9 agreement," Pashinyan told a group of MPs on January 13. 

It was an ironic reference to the Azerbaijani side's contention, reiterated recently by Aliyev, that the provision on opening transit links in the Russian-brokered peace accord that ended the 2020 Second Karabakh War stipulates a seamless corridor through Armenia connecting mainland Azerbaijan and the Nakhchivan exclave, without Armenian border or customs checks. 

That idea is referred to in Azerbaijan as the "Zangezur corridor" and Baku has pushed for it with varying degrees of intensity since the 2020 ceasefire. Early last year it seemed to back down on the demand in the context of the peace talks. 

In early October, shortly after Azerbaijan's lightning offensive to seize the whole of Nagorno-Karabakh, the corridor project seemed to be off the table after ground was broken on an alternate route through Iran.  (Tehran, like Armenia, is vociferously opposed to the Zangezur corridor idea.)

The issue, which has long inspired Armenian fears of an Azerbaijani invasion, is now back on the agenda, as Aliyev said in a January 10 interview that if the corridor was not opened, "Armenia will remain in an eternal deadlock. … If the route I mentioned is not opened, we will not open our border with Armenia anywhere else. So they will do themselves more harm than good."

In October last year, the Armenian prime minister introduced an initiative called "Crossroads of Peace" aimed at regional cooperation. That proposal includes linkages between mainland Azerbaijan and Nakhchivan with Armenian border and customs checks. Azerbaijan has dismissed it out of hand as "PR." (According to the 9 November 2020 agreement that ended the Second Karabakh War, the route linking mainland Azerbaijan Nakhchivan is to be monitored by Russian border troops.)

Exclaves and villages

Elsewhere in his January 10 interview, Aliyev demanded the return of enclaves and border villages that have been under Armenian control since the First Karabakh War three decades ago. 

Pashinyan seemed to back the idea of an exchange of enclaves, with a "mutually agreed map" as part of the process, but said that if Azerbaijan demanded the return of eight villages, Armenia would "raise the issue of 32." 

That was a reference to several bits of former Soviet Armenian territory that have similarly been controlled by Azerbaijan since the first war, as well as to the territory inside Armenia, estimated to total about 215 square kilometers, that Azerbaijani troops have occupied following several incursions between May 2021 and September 2022. 

Armenia and several Western states have demanded the withdrawal of Azerbaijani troops from Armenian lands. But Baku has refused, citing the lack of demarcation of the borders as justification. 

And Aliyev said explicitly he had no intention of withdrawing them in his January 10 remarks. "We are not taking a step back because that border must be defined. However, our location, which is currently disputed by Armenia, does not include any settlement."

The delimitation and demarcation of state borders between Armenia and Azerbaijan, as well as the opening of transport links, remain the most contested issues between the two countries following Azerbaijan's takeover of Karabakh in September. The border commission working on the delimitation and demarcation issues held its latest meeting late last year and the next one, according to Aliyev, is to be held this month, with the question of the border villages in the Gazakh region of Azerbaijan being on the agenda.

Although the principles of a peace deal were said to be agreed upon in November, the sides seem to have dismissed each other's draft proposals for the peace agreement. 

Additionally, the sides disagree on who should mediate the talks. Yerevan opposes Moscow's mediation, while Baku has turned down EU or US-initiated talks in recent months. 

In December, the two countries managed to issue a joint statement and agree on a prisoner exchange, but they do not have a clear plan to continue the bilateral talks.


Armenian President meets with IAEA Director General in Davos

 13:38,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 17, ARMENPRESS. President of Armenia Vahagn Khachaturyan has met with Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Raphael Grossi during the World Economic Forum in Davos.

During the meeting President Khachaturyan emphasized the importance of the long and productive cooperation between the Armenian government and the IAEA, which is of significant importance for ensuring Armenia’s energy security, Khachaturyan’s office said in a readout.

Ideas were exchanged about further development of the atomic energy, as a green energy sector, in Armenia. Grossi said that Armenia can always expect support from the IAEA.

An agreement was reached to continue close cooperation especially as part of expert consultations and comprehensive assistance provision.

President Khachaturyan meets with IMF Managing Director in Davos

 13:46,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 17, ARMENPRESS. President Vahagn Khachaturyan has met with Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Kristalina Georgieva on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos.

The President highly appreciated the productive cooperation between the IMF and Armenia and expressed certainty that the partnership will continue.

Georgieva highlighted the impressive financial figures in Armenia of the recent period and emphasized that establishment of sustainable, final peace in the region will open broader possibilities and directions for economic growth.

The President of Armenia and the IMF Managing Director also discussed the present-day challenges and their impact on global economic development and progress.

Davos 2024: Armenian President, UN High Commissioner for Refugees discuss Nagorno- Karabakh

 14:08,

YEREVAN, JANUARY 17, ARMENPRESS. President of Armenia Vahagn Khachaturyan has met with United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos.

Both sides praised the effective cooperation of over 30 years between Armenia and the UNHCR, Khachaturyan’s Office said in a readout.

Khachaturyan and Grandi discussed the humanitarian and social problems facing the forcibly displaced persons of Nagorno-Karabakh and the steps aimed at resolving the issues.

Grandi inquired about the social protection and accommodation conditions, as well as other humanitarian issues, of more than 100,000 forcibly displaced persons of Nagorno-Karabakh. In this context the President presented in detail the Armenian government’s rapid response programs and actions aimed at resolving both the primary and complex problems of the forcibly displaced persons.

An agreement was reached to continue close cooperation to resolve the existing issues.