BAKU: Azerbaijan for peaceable resolution of NK conflict – Azeripres

Azerbaijan for peaceable resolution of Nagorno-Karabakh conflict – Azeri president

TREND Info, Azerbaijan
May 5 2006

Source: Trend
Author: S.Aliyev

05.05.2006

Azerbaijan wants to resolve the Azerbaijani-Armenian conflict over
Nagorno-Karabakh in a peaceable way and is sure that there are still
chances for it, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev stated in Baku on
May to the opening of the 9th summit of the ECO members-states.

The head of state sated that the patience of the Azerbaijani people
is limited. The Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict can be resolved only
within the framework of the international rule of law. “Armenian
occupants forces must leave the Azerbaijani lands and the Azerbaijani
ought to be repatriated to there native lands in order to restore
justice. Any agreement out of this agreement is impossible, as it is
a requirement of the international law,” Aliyev said. The territorial
integrity of Azerbaijan cannot be topic of talks. The President
voiced his gratitude to ECO countries for recognition of Azerbaijan’s
position.

The President stated that there are all terms among ECO member-states
for comprehensive development of economic relationships, whilst their
deepening requires the strengthening of necessary measures in
security of the region. “Azerbaijan takes an active part in the
process and will continue doing so. However, there are a number of
questions exciting concerns. First of all these are issues of
combating international terror, which also requires unification of
efforts of all countries,” the President underlined, noting that all
terror organizations should be viewed from one and the same point. He
reminded that Azerbaijan is a country which suffered from this
problem. The Armenian terror organizations organized over 30 terror
attacks on Azerbaijan, which resulted in death of over 2000 innocent
civilians. The ongoing conflict broken out by Armenia in respect to
Azerbaijan is the major obstacle in the regional, Aliyev underscored.

TBILISI: You have just won a free,week-long holiday to either Armeni

The Messenger, Georgia
May 5 2006

You have just won a free, week-long holiday to either Armenia or
Azerbaijan. Which country would you choose to visit?

“Neither of them! I would sell my ticket and buy a ticket to my dream
country – Brazil. I would like to visit this country very much
because the people seem cool and of course I love samba. As for
Armenia and Azerbaijan they are the two countries I like least of
all.”
Tiko, student, 23

“I would choose Azerbaijan. I have been to both of these countries
and would freely choose a week-long holiday in Baku rather than in
Yerevan. Due to favorable natural resources and the inflow of
capital, Baku has become the dream city of the Caucasus. Believe me
and take your rest there.”
Tiniko, office manager, 37

“Well, it would be super to win a free week’s holiday and if I had
such chance I would prefer to go to Armenia because I have lots of
Armenian friends and want to know what their motherland looks like.”
Lia, student, 18

“I do not really know. I was in both countries during Soviet times
but I am not sure which of them would be worth visiting nowadays. I
guess would just flip a coin.”
Nodar, unemployed, 57

“Because I am interested in taking a closer look at all the Caucasian
countries I do not know which one I would choose. I would definitely
try to visit both. If I had to pick one I guess I would have to ask
Mom to decide.”
Nino, manager, 26

“Each of these countries has their own interesting history and
culture. I like traveling and therefore I would divide my free,
week-long holiday and I would visit both countries.”
Lika, accountant, 29

“Oh, it would be really great to a win free, week-long holiday. But
to tell the truth if I had such a chance I would prefer to go
somewhere other than Armenia or Azerbaijan.”
Gigi, artist, 22

“If I had such a chance I would prefer to go to Azerbaijan because I
know that it is a very good country and that its capital Baku is very
beautiful. I would like to spend a week there.”
Nia, teacher, 45

“If I won a free week-long holiday either to Armenia or Azerbaijan
and I had to choose I would choose Azerbaijan because I have seen the
pictures of Baku and I liked it very much. It would be great to visit
such a beautiful city and even to spend a week there.”
Keti, accountant, 34

BAKU: Azerbaijan and Armenia accepted to CE for peaceful resolution

TREND, Azerbaijan
May 5 2006

Azerbaijan and Armenia accepted to CE for peaceful resolution of
Nagorno-Karabkh conflict

Source: Trend
Author: A. Mamedov

05.05.2006

Necessity in peaceful resolution of conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh is
one of the main reasons for acceptance of Azerbaijan and Armenia to
the CE, reportedly said Jean-Louis Loran, CE Director General for
political affairs.

“I am sure that the fastest peaceful resolution of this conflict
enables the two countries shorten their way to integration with
European value system”,- he said in the course of his speech within
today’s forum “Armenia in CE, 5 years of membership” in Yerevan.

Loran said also South Caucasus shall become a part of today’s Europe,
providing that no hate or hostility continues under the all-European
‘roof’.

The Council of Europe has operated since 1949, includes 46 countries
of the world with total population over 800mln people. Armenia joined
the CE January 25, 2001, alongside Azerbaijan, Armenia-Novosti reports.

Greek American Membership Organizations’ 2006 Policy Statement onArm

Greek American Membership Organizations’ 2006 Policy Statement on Armenia

_ l?newsid=5023&lang=US_
( =5023&lang=US)

WASHINGTON, DC– American Hellenic Institute president Gene Rossides
announced today that the major Greek American membership organizations
endorsed the 2006 policy statement on Armenia. Prepared by the
American Hellenic Institute, it is part of the 2006 Greek American
Policy Statements. The major membership organizations are: the
Order of AHEPA, the Hellenic American National Council, the Cyprus
Federation of America, the Panepirotic Federation of America, the
Pan-Macedonian Association of America, the PanCretan Association
of America, the Pan-Pontian Federation of U.S.A. and Canada and the
American Hellenic Institute. The endorsed statement follows:

Armenia

We support the Armenian American community’s efforts to secure full
recognition, proper commemoration, and a just resolution of the
Armenian Genocide.

In 2006, the 91st anniversary of the Genocide, the Administration
should, for the sake of U.S. interests and American values, finally
bring an end to all forms of U.S. complicity in Turkey’s denial of
this crime against all humanity. The President, in his annual April
24th remarks, should properly recognize the Armenian Genocide as a
clear instance of genocide, as defined by the United Nations Genocide
Convention. In addition, the Administration should refrain from taking
punitive actions against diplomats, such as U.S. Ambassador to Armenia
John Evans, who have spoken truthfully about the Armenian Genocide.

The U.S. Congress should adopt legislation both recognizing the
Armenian Genocide and urging the American people to apply the lessons
of this tragedy to the cause of preventing future genocides.

Finally, Turkey must be pressured to acknowledge its genocidal crime
against the Armenian nation, to come to terms with this chapter in
its history, and, consistent with the Genocide Convention and other
relevant international legal instruments, to make full reparations
to the Armenian people.

We also support efforts to press Turkey to lift its illegal blockade
of Armenia and to end the mistreatment of the Armenian population
in Turkey.

We refer readers to Professor Peter Balakian’s recent book The Burning
Tigris, a remarkable history of the Armenian Genocide by the Young
Turk government in Turkey. Professor Balakian includes the details
of the humanitarian movement of leading American public citizens
and ordinary citizens to save the Armenians.

http://www.hellenicnews.com/readnews.htm
http://www.hellenicnews.com/readnews.html?newsid

Nagorno-Karabakh analyst on Vilnius conference:”evidently, they are

Nagorno-Karabakh analyst on Vilnius conference: “evidently, they are deluding themselves”

_
()
13:15 05/06/2006

“The forum on NATO’s Role in Defrosting Frozen Conflicts recently
held in Vilnius is a landmark event revealing a number of trends,”
Karabakh analyst David Babayan commented to a REGNUM reporter. First
of all, the Forum confirms the gravity of NATO’s plan to strengthen
its role in resolving conflicts in South Caucasus.

“We can only welcome participation of such an influential organization
in peaceful conflict settlement in this strategically important South
Caucasian region. However, the conference participants offer NATO
a ready approach, a preset settlement scenario. They behave quite
contradictory in this context,” David Babayan said. He reminded
that in the declaration adopted at the forum it is pointed out that
unsettled conflicts in Transdniestria, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and
Nagorno Karabakh corrupt general European well-being: “The existence
of unrecognized states is straightforwardly characterized in the
declaration as aggressive separatism. Meanwhile, another declaration
article proclaims that unsettled European conflicts may be settled
only based on principles of democratic pluralism and respect for human
rights, as well as with the assistance of peacekeeping missions. These
two theses conflict with each other. On the one hand, unrecognized
states are stigmatized as aggressively separatist, which excludes
every chance to recognize their self-determination. On the other
hand, principles of democratic pluralism and respect for human rights
are maintained. What is it really that hinders application of the
abovementioned democratic principles?” David Babayan questions.

The situation, according to Babayan, is rather paradoxical: politicians
are trying to “delude themselves and avoid taking decisions crucial
for the strengthening of democracy itself.” “Meanwhile, international
conflicts are a good test to measure democracy. It is how states
behave in the process of conflict settlement and how they approach
the settlement that indicates most clearly sincerity of the states’
adherence to democratic values. Otherwise, lofty democratic ideals
merely camouflage aggressive imperial striving,” analyst stressed. He
believes that the threat of such neo-imperial striving to democratic
communities could not be overemphasized. It is too often underestimated
due to the small size and relative weakness of states who adopt
such covert official ideology. “An analogy with medicine immediately
comes to mind. Generally speaking, the size of viruses is neglectable
compared to the size of organisms which they invade, but the former
are able to parasitize and paralyze the latter, even when these are
healthy and very large organisms,” David Babayan resumed.

http://www.regnum.ru/english/635569.html
www.regnum.ru/english/635569.html_

Saakashvili: “No single gram of Russia must be left in Georgia”

Saakashvili: “No single gram of Russia must be left in Georgia”

_ (h
ttp://)
13:28 05/04/2006

During his meeting with Kutaisi residents Georgian President Mikhail
Saakashvili addressed with a number of tough statements to Russia
and said that he had instructed the Georgian government to consider
the expediency of Georgia’s further membership in the CIS, reports
a REGNUM correspondent. He said that when flying by Tskhinvali
en route to Kutaisi, he got a “Welcome to the Russian Federation”
message from Megaphone, a Russian mobile operator that operates in
the unrecognized Republic of South Ossetia. Saakashvili called this
“a classical example of annexation.” He also spoke about the ban on
the import of Georgian food in Russia.

“They have put a ban of something we have been selling to Russia for
several decades, something Georgia is homeland to – Georgian wine. Let
alone other products. For example, Kutaisi exported big quantity of
greens to Russia – a business worth several hundreds of millions of
lari – now it has been fully closed, and several hundreds of thousands
of people have been left jobless and with smaller profits,” Sakashvili
said. He noted that the goal of this all is “to make Georgia starve”
and to make people rise against their authorities.

He said that some Russian official clearly said this a few days ago –
“I wonder why after all this the Georgian people is not going into the
streets and is not throwing down its government.” “Their goal is to
change the government that is the last chance for Georgia to restore
its territorial integrity by peace. I want us all to wake up, to sober
up and to realize what danger we are faced with,” Saakashvili said.

“Today we all, irrespective of our political faith, our views, our
origin, are faced with the danger of losing our country, our state,
our independence, our freedom and our future. It is time for all of
us to wake up, to stop petty disputes, intrigues and gossips and to
see what real threats we are facing.

The real threat is that we may lose our country. However, we will not
lose our country because we have already consolidated our state. Last
year we had a 9.5% economic growth – 3.5% more than Russia had – and
in January-March 2006 our preliminary economic growth was 12%-13% —
three times more than in Russia, a country who has oil and gas.” At
the same time, Saakashvili reminded that Russia has raised the fuel
price for Georgia, which has forced people to spend more on electricity
and heating.

“Nevertheless, each of us must understand that we will continue our
development, we will continue attracting investments, strengthening
our democracy, making Georgia a successful country. Our only answer to
those people will be a free, successful, rich country, where people
will be happy and united.” At the same time, Saakashvili noted that
Georgia wants “a very intensive dialogue” with Russia. “We have no
Russo-phobia or any other critical attitude toward s Russia. We want
friendship with Russia – but with Russia that respects our sovereignty,
that will not close the only Georgian church in the center of Moscow
and will not turn out its parish just because they speak Georgian
– with Russia that will not close Georgian Sunday schools in its
territory just because their pupils speak Georgian – with Russia that
will not create problems on the border.”

As an example, Saakashvili told a story about his own family. “A
few days ago my grandmother, who is in a good shape but still
an old woman – went via Russia to an international conference on
allergology and immunology. They at the Moscow airport kept her for
over two hours. They rummaged in her things – she was probably like
a contrabandist — and then they interrogated her for two hours:
what allergology is and what immunology is. Don’t we in Russia
have allergology and immunology? Why are you going abroad? What
kind of professor she was, when she defended her thesis, where she
works, where she lives. In fact, they mocked at her. And this is a
president’s grandmother. But there are very many ordinary grandmothers
and grandfathers, ordinary people who are hurt because of senseless,
unclear, unreasoned, simply harmful policy.”

“I want us to react to this peacefully, calmly, but with dignity. We
want to continue our consultations with Russia, but, at the same time,
I want everybody to know that we must make certain decisions. In late
1991 Georgia became independent – most countries officially recognized
our independence then even though we had proclaimed it much earlier –
and like the Baltic states, Georgia refused to join the CIS. Later, in
1993, during the Abkhazian tragedy, the impoverished and humiliated
Georgia was forced to join the CIS. I think that even though it
was actually a humiliating act, we have got much profit from our
membership in the CIS. We have preserved our ties with the former
Soviet republics, with most of them we have very tight and very
friendly relations.

We have concluded bilateral agreements, we have established trade
networks, we have ensured free movement of people and personal ties. In
the last years this all has got much more active, and I am very glad
to see Azeris, Armenians, Kazakhs, Byelorussians, Ukrainians coming to
Georgia. It is also important that we have had long partnership with
Russia, our products have been in demand in Russia and this demand
has grown lately. This year Russia ordered twice as much Georgian
wine as a year before. But all this has been blocked by Russia. So,
we should sit down and calculate if it is expedient for us to stay
in the CIS any longer.”

“Today, I have instructed the Georgian government to thoroughly
examine and shortly — in several weeks, two months, at latest –
to report to me whether it is economically expedient for Georgia to
stay in the CIS any longer. If we can still get any profit from it,
we will stay. If, as I suspect, this organization can give us nothing
more but humiliation and insult, the Georgian people, together with
its parliament and government, must make a decision worthy of a nation
having dignity and standing firmly on its feet. At the same time,
we must consult on the issue with all our friends and partners,
including the CIS countries, and coordinate our policy with them.”

“We must learn to enter all markets. We will certainly come back to
the Russian market, but as long as the people who are choking us have
an illusion that they are our only way, they will go on squeezing
out our resources to keep us humiliated, infringed and economically
depressed. But as soon as they learn that Georgia has other markets,
that Georgia has actually European and world quality products, we will
have much more ways. We are not going to enter other markets through
the back entrance. We must know that Russia’s import wine market is
just half of what the US has and we perfectly know what sympathies
the US has for Georgia today. We must work. I must thank the Russian
government for its big publicity of our wine – for in the last two
weeks the Georgian wine has got as much publicity as it has not got
throughout its three millennium history. I was in Brussels a few days
ago. I walked in the streets and one man told me: I didn’t know you
have a wine. That ordinary man read about our wine in a newspaper. All
the world’s papers are giving this story, and no one doubts that our
wine was banned not because of pesticides – everybody knows why it
was banned. The Georgian wine is now called a drink of freedom.”

Saakashvili also said that the Georgian government has begun
subsidizing the national wine industry. “We have allocated money
for marketing and publicity in Eastern Europe and America – we
have allocated several millions US dollars for that and we will
allocate tens of millions more if we see that this business works
out.” “Yesterday the government decided — and I approved its decision
– to allocate a state credit and to bring a grape processing plant to
produce not only wine but also grape concentrate to be able to procure
the whole wine stuff already this year. My strict order – and I will
personally control its fulfillment – is that no peasant should lose
heart. We must plant grape instead of cutting it. But let’s learn
to give good production – not only wine. We must not cut our citrus
plants but must learn to process, pack, make juice and other products
of them. The most important thing is that we must learn to work better
and to advertise better. We must learn to do much in many spheres.”

Reverting to the problem of Tbilisi-Moscow relations, Saakashvili
said that he knows “those people.” “Even if we kneel, kiss their feet,
swear to be loyal to them for ever, they still won’t give us a single
gram of humanity. This is their psychology, their complexes – they
want you to be either their slave or their enemy. Georgia will not
be anybody’s slave. Georgia must not be anybody’s enemy, and we will
develop good relations with everybody. The Baltic states, Poland,
Hungary – all of them have passed this way. But our way is twice as
hard to pass – because we must pass it and reach Sukhumi. We must pass
i t in such a way that nobody can send us messages from Tskhinvali
saying ‘ Welcome to Russia.’ We must pass it so as no gram of Russia
be left in the territory of Georgia.”

“This is the task of not only ethnic Georgians, but the common task of
our Armenians, our Azeris, our Ossetians, our Abkhazians, our Kurds,
our Russians, our Ukrainians. If we take only ethnic Georgians, we
are few, if we take everybody who was born in Georgia, we are over
6 millions worldwide – this is already a force. This is already a
big force – those who are in the country and those who are outside
it.” Saakashvili also said that Georgia must be ready for “anything”
and warned that “there will still be provocations.” At the same time,
he noted that the Georgian authorities have “specific documentary
information on who is plotting what provocations.”

www.regnum.ru/english/633435.html_
www.regnum.ru/english/633435.html

BAKU: Azeri and Armenian FMs meet in Strasburg to talk of futuremee

TREND Information, Azerbaijan
May 5 2006

Azeri and Armenian FMs meet in Strasburg to talk of future meeting
of presidents

Source: Trend
Author: A.Mamedov

05.05.2006

Today Vardan Oskanyan, Armenian Foreign Minister, said in Yerevan,
quoting ‘in two weeks Azeri and Armenian FMs are meeting in Strasburg
within session of CE’s Ministers Committee and talk of future meeting
of president of the two countries”.

Mediamax agency reports, Oskanyan said date and location of future
meeting were still uncertain.

Armenian FM called journalists not to seek for ‘strings attached’ in
the fact of last time’s individual visits of Minsk Group cochairmen
to the region. Oskanyan assured that was conditioned by lack of
convergence in arbitrators’ schedules.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

A look at key U.S. oil suppliers

A look at key U.S. oil suppliers

By Associated Press
May 6, 2006

The nuclear standoff with Iran and insurgencies in Iraq and Africa
have rattled world energy markets. But the threat to supply extends
far beyond these hotspots.

The United States depends on resources from a number of overseas
markets, which threaten to become more of a risk.

Those suppliers also include:

â~@¢ Russia, whose brief energy conflict with Ukraine last winter
severely hit the European Union. Moscow, which is flexing its energy
muscle for geopolitical leverage, accounts for more than 10 percent
of the world’s daily oil output and a fifth of its natural gas.

President Vladimir Putin’s drive to reassert state influence over
the nation’s oil and gas sectors has spooked consumer nations.

â~@¢ Saudi Arabia, the world’s No. 1 oil producer and a key U.S.

supplier. It has been singled out as a target by Osama bin Laden, and
the country remains on alert after foiling an al-Qaida-linked attack on
its vast Abqaiq oil processing plant in February. That attack prompted
Kuwait to express concern about the security of its own oil facilities.

An additional threat to oil installations is the potential for
insurgency fomented by Tehran among the Saudi Shiite minority –
and those in neighboring oil-producing nations.

â~@¢ Venezuela and Bolivia, where moves by populist leaders to impose
more state control over the gas or oil sectors, gives them growing
leverage to use energy as a political tool. Bolivia, which recently
called out the army to enforce its claims, has South America’s
second-largest natural gas reserves after Venezuela.

Venezuela, whose President Hugo Chavez has threatened to blow up his
country’s oil fields in case of U.S. attack, is the fourth-largest
supplier of crude to the United States – for now. Chavez is
increasingly selling to China and Cuba, and his oil minister has
threatened to stop supplying America.

â~@¢ The Caspian Sea region, which has estimated oil reserves between
17 billion and 44 billion barrels and is potentially a key transit
point for oil to the West. But it is rife with ethnic conflicts in
Chechnya, Georgia and the autonomous enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh.

Energy nationalism is also a factor – with Turkmenistan recently
declaring its on-land gas and oil fields off-limits to foreign
companies. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization, a regional alliance
led by China and Russia, last year called on the United States to
set a date for withdrawing forces from the region.

â~@¢ The East China Sea, where conflicting claims to rich underwater
gas reserves have added to historical rivalries between Japan and
China.

In the first three months of this year, the Japanese military said it
had scrambled fighter jets 107 times to intercept suspected Chinese
spy planes – most of them over the East China Sea – compared to 13
times in all of 2005.

Copyright 2006, The Albuquerque Tribune. All Rights Reserved.

–Boundary_(ID_p2Kghtz5o4Djw++B2H0KMQ)- –

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

PM’s ‘genocide’ comment sparks row with Turkey

PM’S ‘GENOCIDE’ COMMENT SPARKS ROW WITH TURKEY

Ottawa Citizen
Saturday, May 06, 2006

OTTAWA — Turkey has recalled its ambassador to Canada as the country
plots an official response to Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s recent
acknowledgement of the 1915 Armenian genocide — one of the most
disputed and politically fraught events of the 20th century.

Harper’s three-paragraph statement April 19 to mark the “sombre
anniversary” — the first time that Canada has made such a statement
— barely caught the attention of most Canadians, but it ignited a
furor in Ankara that appears set to boil over.

An official at the Turkish Embassy in Ottawa told CanWest News
Service that Aydemir Erman has not been formally withdrawn from
Canada over the prime minister’s comments, but he has been “called
back” to Turkey to discuss with government officials what steps will
be taken to express displeasure with the remarks.

Those options include the formal withdrawal of Turkey’s top diplomat
in Canada, a threat Turkey has made with Canada and other countries
in the past.

“The ambassador is now travelling to Turkey because our authorities
have asked him to join them for consultations and, indeed, it is
related to what’s been happening here in the last week or so here in
Canada with the prime minister’s declaration,” said Yoney Tezel, a
counsellor with the embassy.

Ottawa’s official position that 1.5 million Armenians were killed in
a “genocide” adds Canada to a group of about 25 other countries,
including France, Russia, Poland and Argentina.

“For us, this is a serious matter,” Tezel said. “The Armenian claims
are a direct attack on our identity, on Turkey’s history. We feel
it’s unfair. That’s why when these claims find some recognition we
always consider that something negative.”

Harper’s statement, delivered on the 91st anniversary of the
bloodbath, noted that both the Senate and the House of Commons have
adopted motions acknowledging that a genocide took place.

“My party and I supported those resolutions and continue to recognize
them today,” he said.

On April 25, Turkey’s Foreign Ministry issued a statement accusing
Harper of exhibiting a “gravely prejudiced attitude.”

“Such statements … are not only counter-productive to the
atmosphere of dialogue we wish to build between Turkey and Armenia,
but also adversely affect the relations between Turkey and Canada,”
the Turkish government said.

A Turkish newspaper, Hurriyet, reported after Harper’s statement that
Canadian companies would be barred from bidding on contracts related
to the construction of a major nuclear power plan.

Arif Babikian, executive director of the Armenian National Committee
of Canada, said Turkey has reacted similarly in the past.

“In 2002, when the Senate passed a resolution, they also threatened
and blackmailed Canada that they are going to cut the relationship
and boycott Canadian companies and nothing happened,” he said. “They
did the same thing in 2004 when the House of Commons passed a
resolution. Now they are using the same tactics.”

[email protected]

Ilham Aliyev: nothing new can be proposed on the Nagorno-Karabakhiss

Ilham Aliyev: nothing new can be proposed on the Nagorno-Karabakh issue
settlement

_
()
11:37 05/06/2006

“All possible ways of Nagorno-Karabakh conflict settlement have already
been considered,” President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev stated on May
5 in Baku, Trend News Agency informs.

According to Aliyev, “at present, the Co-Chairs are intensively
consulting each other and considering various conflict resolution
options. And it’s possible that some novelties will appear.”

“I don’t believe that any new proposal may be put forward to solve
the issue. Some of the proposals which are being discussed could
be adjusted. I do not rule that out. If that is the case, it could
facilitate resolving theissue,”
Ilham Aliyev added.

According to the Azerbaijani President, his country’s position remains
unchanged. “We advocate application of international legal norms,
and a single standard should be used in this case,” Ilham Aliyev added.

http://www.regnum.ru/english/635647.html
www.regnum.ru/english/635647.html_