BAKU: N.Mammadov: “Co-chairs do not have any suggestions at present”

Today, Azerbaijan
March 25 2006

Novruz Mammadov: “Co-chairs do not have any suggestions to
conflicting sides at present”

25 March 2006 [09:59] – Today.Az

“The Minsk Group co-chairs usually exchange views on the negotiating
process over the settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, and
inform the conflicting sides about their conclusions only in the
meeting with either FM or with President,” the Head of the
President’s Office Department of International Relations, Novruz
Mammadov stated.

According to APA, after 20 March meeting in Washington, the co-chairs
have not initiated organizing meeting of the Foreign Ministers.

“It seems, there is nothing to inform about,” Mr.Mammadov said.

Commenting on American co-chair Steven Mann’s recent statement “2006
represents a chance to solve the conflict. It is desirable to reach a
peace agreement in this year,” Mr.Mamamdov said, “Of course, it would
be great if a peace agreement is reached, there is a good opportunity
for that. We also want to achieve this agreement. However,
Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity should be ensured, and the
conflict should be settled in compliance with international juridical
norms and principles. We know that it is impossible to solve the
conflict in a way that will satisfy both sides. Therefore, if our
proposals concerning the settlement are accepted, we would welcome
it. As coming to what Armenia thinks concerning this issue, it is
quite another matter,” Mammadov said.

Referring to the objective of Steven Mann’s visit to Baku last week,
Mammadov said, “The co-chair came to meet the President again,
familiarize with his stance, and express that the US is concerned in
settling of conflict as soon as possible,” he reported.

Russian co-chair Yuri Merzlyakov refusing to inform journalists about
the talks in Rambouillet, participation of another Russian diplomat
in Istanbul talks instead of him caused hearsays that the co-chair
will be substituted. Referring to these hearsays, Mammadov said that
Russia is responcible to substitute the co-chair.

“As coming to his refusing to give briefings, I shall remind you that
various statements were voiced before the talks in Rambouillet. So,
probably, Mr.Merzlyakov acts in a diplomatic way refusing to issue
unnecessary statements,” Mammadov said.

URL:

http://www.today.az/news/politics/24416.html

Kenya: Armenians in fresh dispute over company

Daily Nation , Kenya
March 25 2006

Armenians in fresh dispute over company

Story by NATION Correspondent
Publication Date: 3/26/2006
The case of the alleged mercenaries has taken another turn.

A Nairobi businessman has written to the Registrar of Societies
protesting that a company allegedly owned by the two Armenian men at
the centre of the mercenary saga is using a name identical to that
used by his firm.

In a letter to the Registar-General last Friday, lawyer Harith Sheth
complains that his clients are the registered shareholders of
Kensington Holdings Ltd.

It reads: “Arising from recent reports in the press our clients have
learnt with great surprise that there is yet another company being
called Kensington Holdings, apparently registered on January 8, 2005
… we demand an explanation from yourselves as to why a second
company was allowed to be registered with a name identical to that of
our client company. Our clients have nothing to do with the
controversy mentioned in the press. We therefore demand an apology
from yourselves for permitting a second company with an identical
name to our client company to be registered. We require you to either
strike off the second company or have its name changed to a different
name.”

Press reports have named the controversial brothers, Artur Margaryan
and Artur Sargasyan, as partners with Ms Winfred Wangui, the daughter
of prominent Narc activist Mary Wambui, as partners in a company
called Kensington Holdings Ltd.

Mr Sheth is representing Mr Karim Gulamhussein Bhanji and Mr Amirali
Gulamhussein Bhanji.

According to documents made available to the Sunday Nation,
Kensington Holdings was first registered in February 13, 2004 by a
Nairobi lawyer, Mr Mohammed Madhani, and his wife, Mrs Shemin
Madhani.

Mr Madhani explained that on May 19 the same year, he and his wife
resigned as directors and handed over their interests in the company
to Karim and Amirali Bhanji, who to date remain the shareholders and
directors.

The Registrar was duly notified of the change of ownership. According
to Mr Sheth, his clients have not sold the company or invited other
persons to be shareholders and directors.

Snap Judgement: Home is where the vote is

Jerusalem Post
March 25 2006

Snap Judgement: Home is where the vote is
By CALEV BEN-DAVID

Here’s an interesting trivia question: Name at least one other
country besides Israel that does not allow absentee balloting (voting
from abroad, except for diplomatic officials) in national elections?

Need a hint? It’s another relatively small nation (population three
million) with a large diaspora community and a storied history,
bordered by hostile states in a volatile part of the world.

The answer can be found lower down. But before we get there, let’s
talk about why absentee balloting is still a bad idea for this
country, despite a recent Jerusalem Post editorial arguing otherwise.

There are indeed, as the editorial pointed out, arguments to be made
to change a policy that has existed since the founding of the state.
In the global communications age it is no longer a daunting task to
conduct an absentee ballot vote; far bigger countries than Israel,
including the US, do so without major problems. It is also true that
“as with most other developed democracies, Israel has thousands of
loyal citizens legitimately abroad for various periods of time, in
the wake of their admirably productive work in a rapidly globalizing
world.”

And yes, while once allowing absentee ballots had the stigma of
legitimizing yerida (emigration from Israel), it can be reasonably
argued that “Israel has become sufficiently established, both
demographically and economically, to not fear that an absentee ballot
would be misinterpreted as a prize for leaving.”

However that doesn’t mitigate the fact that an estimated 600,000
Israelis – roughly 10 percent of the electorate – now make their home
more-or-less permanently abroad. I’m hardly comfortable with the
notion that these expatriate Israelis could be such a decisive factor
in elections that, for example, could determine the state’s permanent
borders, and I can imagine many other resident Israelis who feel the
same.

Personally, when I moved from the US to Israel 20 years ago, I made a
decision to stop voting in American elections. In this globalized
world, it is indeed increasingly common for people to have
citizenship in more than one country; my own children hold three
different passports.

But voting is not a right of citizenship, it’s a privilege. In many
democratic societies, voter registration is not automatic (although
in this one it is) and can be limited under certain conditions (such
as for convicted prisoners). It certainly seems to me a reasonable
proposition that if one holds citizenship in a certain nation, but
has no intention of making permanent residence there, choosing not to
take part in its elections is the proper decision.

Of course, it’s not always so easy to determine whether someone is
really intending to reside permanently abroad; many Israelis
themselves don’t honestly know the answer to that question, even
after years of living away from home. At least one way then, of
testing the civic commitment of expatriates, is by demanding they
return home at least once every few years to vote in a national
election. This is presumably why countries with large diaspora
communities, such as Armenia – the answer to the above question –
have no absentee ballot.

YET EVEN if one rejects this argument, there’s another good reason
why absentee balloting is specifically a bad idea for Israel. The
problem is connected to the Law of Return, which makes it easier for
foreign Jews to obtain Israeli citizenship than immigrants to most
other countries. The Israeli expatriate community already includes
many immigrants who, for various reasons, returned to their countries
of origin, some after living here for a relatively short period of
time. In recent years there has even been growing concern that some
of these short-term olim basically exploited the Law of Return simply
to obtain the assistance given to new immigrants, before they
returned home or moved on elsewhere. If absentee balloting were
approved, it’s possible that the right to vote would be similarly
abused by Jews abroad looking to influence the ideological direction
of Israel without any intention to actually live here on a permanent
basis.

Sound far-fetched? I don’t think so. I personally know many such
people in the American Jewish community, on both the Right and Left,
who would like nothing better than having the privilege of voting in
Israeli elections, without the inconvenience of actually having to
pay Israeli taxes, serve (or have their children serve) in the IDF,
learn Hebrew, or risk getting on the same roads as Israeli drivers.

Nor can I say I blame them. Especially since there have been some
serious proposals – in one case from no less than Natan Sharansky –
suggesting that some kind of system be set up that would allow world
Jewry to take part in Israeli elections.

Even the recent PR effort “IsraelVotes,” in which American college
students took part via the Web in mock Israeli elections, seems to
suggest that it might be OK to cast a ballot here without actually
being here. “This is a chance to leverage the Israeli elections, to
use them as a way of showing off Israel’s democracy,” said one of its
promoters.

Actually, I find something profoundly anti-democratic in the notion
of foreign citizens, Jewish or otherwise, even pretending to vote in
another nation’s elections. What’s more, if voting by itself were a
mark of true democracy, the Palestinian Authority, Iraq, Syria and
Iran would all be in far better shape today.

While there may well be a way to answer all these concerns and still
allow absentee balloting, it’s probably best to just continue with
the present voting policy. I don’t relish the thought, under any
circumstances, of heated arguments over disengagement or settlements
at polling stations in Brooklyn, Los Angeles or Amsterdam. If it
really means so much to Israelis living abroad, they’ll find the
airfare to come home to cast their ballots. To quote an old saying in
a different context, “All politics is local” – so let votes about
Israel’s future borders at least be cast within the present ones.

The writer is director of The Israel Project’s Jerusalem Media
Resource Center.

www.theisraelproject.org

Tree Planting of Unity started in Yerevan

Tree Planting of Unity started in Yerevan

ArmRadio.am
25.03.2006 13:16

The Tree planting of Unity to be held all over the territory of Armenia
continued today in Yerevan. About 300 thousand trees were planted in
Kanaker-Zeitun community of Yerevan.

President of the `Nig Aparan’ Patriotic Union, Prosecutor General Aghvan
Vardanyan, Mayor of Yerevan Yervand Zakharyan and Head of Community Arayik
Kotanjyan participated in the tree planting.

The tree planting started from the `Victory’ Park. A wreath of flowers was
laid at the memorial to the Unknown Soldier.

Conference on initial planning of `Joint target 07′ mil exercises

Conference on initial planning of the `Joint target ` 07′ military
exercises will be held in Yerevan

ArmRadio.am
25.03.2006 14:06

The `Best joint effort’ and `Joint partner’ military exercises held
under the NATO’s partnership for peace project have been united under
the `Joint bow’ name. The conferences on initial and general planning
of the exercises were held in Moldova. Two Staff Officers of the Armed
Forces of the Republic of Armenia participated in each of the
conferences.

Representatives of RA Armed Forces will participate also in the final
conference, the place of which has not been set so far.

Press Service of the Ministry of Defense informs that the exercises
will be held September 11-29 in Moldova.

The conference on initial planning of the `Joint target ` 07′ military
exercises will be held September 11-15 in Yerevan.

Regular misinformation of the Azeri media on cease-fire violation

Regular misinformation of the Azeri media on the violation of the cease-fire
regime

ArmRadio.am
25.03.2006 14:30

The information spread by Azerbaijani media, according to which fire
was opened this morning in the direction of Azeri positions from
Shihlar village in Aghdam region, does not correspond to reality; the
Armenian forces are maintaining the cease-fire regime.

Head of the Information Department of the NKR Defense Army Senor
Hasratyan informs that this morning fire was opened by Azeri Armed
Forces in the direction of the Armenian Defense Army at the Northern
part of the contact line. No victims were registered.

1 Million 157 Thousand For The Future of Armenia

1 MILLION 157 THOUSAND FOR THE FUTURE OF ARMENIA

Lragir.am
25 March 06

In 2006-2007 the Education Headed for Future program will be
implemented in Armenia, which will cost 1 million 157 thousand
dollars. The news agency ARKA informs that the agreement on the
program was signed on March 24 by the minister of education and
science Sergo Yeritsyan and the UNDP Resident Coordinator Consuelo
Vidal. After the signing of the agreement Sergo Yeristyan said the
program will be funded by the government of Norway, and the government
of Armenia will provide 55 thousand dollars. `The implementation of
the program will enable reforms in vocational secondary schools,
namely modernization, upgrading of educational standards,
scholarships,’ said Sergo Yeritsyan. The UN representative Consuelo
Vidal emphasized that for the implementation of the program a research
of the Armenian labor pool was conducted. She said today there are
about 27 vocational colleges in Armenia, four will be involved in the
program, one in Yerevan, others in the regions. He emphasized that the
main stress will be placed on upgrading the qualifications of young
people and help them find employment in the regions.

EU to Become Engaged in South Caucasus

EU TO BECOME ENGAGED IN SOUTH CAUCASUS

Lragir.am
25 March 06

Apparently, the EU is going to enhance its efforts in the Karabakh
conflict zone. The report of the International Crisis Group, which
upholds deeper engagement of the EU in the settlement of the South
Caucasian conflicts, is not accidental. The head of the General
Department of Information under NKR President Alexander Grigoryan
believes that as long as the OSCE Minsk Group deals with the
settlement, the efforts of all the other organizations will not be
effective. `The EU is deeply interested in having stability in its
adjacent territories to be able to use the resources of these
territories, particularly, the Azerbaijani oil and gas. I think the EU
can work out a program of assistance to the reconstruction of the
post-conflict territories.

Most probably, in the counseling report a buffer zone is concerned,
which is not inhabited. It might be related to possible tensions
caused by the nuclear program of Iran. Although, I think, tensions in
the region are probable.

Of course, with this state of things, when Russian forces are
stationed in Georgia and Armenia, the U.S. mobile forces may be
deployed in Azerbaijan, and for the EU, which is not present in the
region, it will not be easy to take action against rising
tensions. Therefore, I think, in the nearest future the engagement of
the EU will be indirect and will be confined to counseling reports
without any pressure,’ said Alexander Grigoryan.

The head of the Political Department of the NKR Ministry of Foreign
Affairs Irina Beglaryan said the Ministry of Foreign Affairs shares
the intention of the international community to prevent fully-fledged
wars near the borders of Europe. `In this context we endorse every
effort to establish peace and stability in the South Caucasus and to
settle the Karabakh conflict.

The aspiration of the European organizations is clear: to become more
deeply engaged in the settlement of the South Caucasian conflicts to
guarantee their own security. However, the mechanisms offered in the
report of the International Crisis Group are not applicable, for they
do not reflect the essence of the Karabakh conflict,’ said Irina
Beglaryan. As a positive aspect of the report the foreign ministry
official points out the engagement of the unrecognized countries of
the South Caucasus in the EU integration processes, as well as
parliamentary dialogue.

As to the participation of the EU Special Representative in the talks
under the auspices of the OSCE Minsk Group, it will, on the one hand,
bring a fresh breath into the talks, and on the other hand, will
decentralize efforts.

`At the same time, I would like to state that no format of the
mediators will compensate for the absence of NKR, directly involved in
the conflict, in the talks,’ said Irina Beglaryan.

Refugees Are on PACE Agenda

REFUGEES ARE ON PACE AGENDA

Lragir.am
25 March 06

The Azerbaijani news agency Trend informs that the PACE Spring Session
will discuss the question of adopting a declaration on the refugees
and displaced persons in Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan. The draft
document was worked out by the Latvian reporter of the Committee on
Migration, Refugees and Population Boris Silevic. It is stated in the
report that the problem of refugees and displaced persons in the South
Caucasus hampers economic, social and political development of the
countries of the region, creates problems for the health care
system. Reporter Silevic emphasizes the importance of continuing
European assistance to refugees and displaced persons, as well as
increasing international assistance to guarantee the future of the
refugees and displaced persons in Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. The
draft report states that presently the bulk of the refugees and
displaced persons in the South Caucasus are people who were forced to
leave their homes in the course of the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict
over Nagorno Karabakh. The document points out that the return of
refugees and the displaced persons is impossible without the
settlement of the conflict over Nagorno Karabakh.

Oskanyan Should Have Issued a Note

OSKANYAN SHOULD HAVE ISSUED A NOTE

Lragir.am
25 March 06

The reaction to the U.S. Secretariat report on the strategy of
struggle against drugs is acquiring new forms. On March 24 the leader
of the National Unity Artashes Geghamyan again raised this issue. He
said that instead of assuming the role of a translator and explaining
that the report was translated with mistakes, he should have issued a
protest note to the United States, for ` the mentioning of Armenian
government officials is a blow to the national dignity.’ According to
Geghamyan, however, something different happened. Putting together the
American report, the information of the Russian border guards about
the prevention of transit of drugs on the Iran-Armenia border and the
silence of tax and customs services, Geghamyan concludes, `If all this
information was bottled up, logically government officials are
engaged, who can make this silent. And we know who is almighty.’

Another oppositionist, Victor Dallakyan said the parliamentary
majority was reluctant to set up a provisional committee on the
legitimacy of constitutional referendum in 2005, and concluded that
`they are engaged in electoral fraud.’