The provider

The provider
Jerusalem Post Online
DANIEL BEN-TALMar. 21, 2004

The tale of Rahamim Moshik Levy, a former Etzel militia warrior and
one of the capital’s few surviving kerosene distributors.

Veteran Jerusalemites fondly remember the city’s once-ubiquitous
kerosene distributors.

“There was a time when everybody knew me and I knew everybody,”
recalls Rahamim Moshik Levy, who delivered heating fuel from his horse
and cart for almost two decades.

In 1968, Levy got behind the steering wheel of a much-maligned,
German-made “Gogomobile” distribution van.

“It had an aluminum motor, two flimsy chains, and couldn’t pull a ton
of fuel up the steep Jerusalem hills – I was happier with the horse.”

A road accident in 1984 forced him into early retirement and now he is
wheelchair-bound, but Levy has no regrets.

“I wasn’t spoilt,” he under-states.

The second of eight siblings, he was born in 1927 in Nahlaot – then a
struggling neighborhood of impoverished immigrants from Persia, Allepo
in northern Syria and the Urfa district spanning the Syrian-Turkish
border.

“Life was very, very hard,” Levy relates. “People didn’t have big eyes
in those days – we were happy with what we had. I grew up in a small
ghetto: a tight community, surrounded by Arabs. We were scared to
cross the wadi into Sheikh Bader, where the Knesset and Givat Ram
campus are now. There used to be wheat fields where Sacher Park is
today – as children, we would pick the wheat until the Arabs chased us
away with rocks and dogs.”

His father Moshe (Musa) fled from Urfa to Israel by donkey back in
1916.

“The Turks were slaughtering Armenians by the hundreds of thousands,
and the Jews realized that they were next. Entire villages of Jews
left before the Turks could massacre them also.”

Levy Sr. sold blocks of Nablusi soap (traditional soap from olive oil,
water, elm ashes, and plaster still produced in Nablus).

“We maintained good relations with the Arabs before the War of
Independence.

I had many friends in the Old City, and often slept at Abu-Haled’s
house,” he says.

“When I was about 15, he took me to Id-el Adha prayers in the Al-Aksa
Mosque.

I was young and brave, and didn’t think about the danger. I dressed
like a young Muslim, stood when they stood, and knelt when they knelt
– nobody realized that I was a Jew!” While Hebrew was the children’s
mother tongue, the family spoke Arabic at home.

“We would read the Pessah Seder service in Hebrew, Aramaic and
Arabic,” he chuckles, then playfully recites the Ma Nishtana (Four
Questions) in Arabic.

“Our parents spoke to each other in Turkish when they didn’t want us
to understand.”

The pre-state Yishuv endured an economic crisis during the 1930s, and
the debt-shackled family business fell bankrupt in 1936. Aged 13, Levy
became a cobbler.

At the same time, he was also a street activist for the pre-state
Etzel militia.

“Our family hid a weapons slick of pistols and hand grenades under an
old hut in our courtyard, but I wasn’t involved in the hit-and-run
operations – my job was to post Herut banners around the city under
the cover of darkness,” he says.

Early one morning, the British police caught Levy by the Ritz Caf near
today’s Liberty Bell Gardens, and took him to their police station
near Jaffa Gate for interrogation. After he was released, his mother
begged him to leave Etzel and join the Hagana instead, so he bought a
blue shirt with red lace – it was a good disguise against the British.

Levy vividly recalls listening to the UN partition vote of November
29, 1947 on a crackling radio.

“It was Saturday night and my father was asleep, but I woke him to
tell him the news. Outside, there was spontaneous celebrating and hora
dancing – except for one rabbi, who warned everyone that the Arabs
were sharpening their swords.”

British rule was already crumbling by the time he was sent for a
two-week Hagana training camp in Tel Aviv.

“Every one of my school class answered the call to the flag. Many did
not return,” he recounts.

On their return, his convoy of armored buses found the road to
Jerusalem blocked by Arab militants, but took advantage of a heavy
rainstorm to break through to the capital.

“The city was under siege. The rain-swept streets were deserted, and
the British were confiscating weapons from Jews to give to the Arabs,”
he recalls.

On May 16, 1948 – the day after prime minister David Ben-Gurion
proclaimed Israel’s independence in Tel Aviv – Levy was dispatched to
guard food convoys to Neveh Ya’acov.

He later spent six months defending Kibbutz Ramat Rahel.

“We lived in trenches and couldn’t raise our heads because of
snipers. On Yom Kippur night 1948, they brought us this secret weapon,
the Davidka. We fired it at Mar Elias and Tzur Bacher… The noise
scared them so much that they ran away.”

Demobilized in 1949, Levy married his childhood sweetheart, Mazal, and
moved into a 3 m. x 2 m. room with no WC or running water. He soon
found a job as one of Jerusalem’s 35 kerosene distributors, riding its
familiar streets on a horse-drawn cart with wooden wheels.

“I would ring my bell, and people shouted their orders from their
windows. It was hard work carrying kerosene containers up staircases
for 12 hours, but I earned six lire a day.”

Levy had to provide for five children, and went back to making shoes
during the summer months.

“I never let them suffer like I did as a child.”

In 1952, he joined the Shalhevet fuel distribution cooperative, and
eventually upgraded to a rubber-tired cart, loading about 600 liters
daily at the kerosene depot near his horse’s stable behind the railway
station.

“Those were the happiest days of my life. I would ring my bell as I
rode past the Jordanian legionnaires on the Old City Walls by the
Mandelbaum Gate.”

He finished his career driving a small Dodge D-200 tanker after the
cooperative folded in 1982.

“Times move on and the market disappeared,” he shrugs.

For comments and feedback on this article email: [email protected]

This article can also be read at
;cid=1079844505460&p=1077423454793

Copyright 1995-2004 The Jerusalem Post –

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&amp
http://www.jpost.com/

BAKU: Armenian leader avoids meeting Azeri counterpart – minister

Armenian leader avoids meeting Azeri counterpart – minister

Azad Azarbaycan TV, Baku
20 Mar 04

[Presenter] The Azerbaijani and Armenian foreign ministers had an
informal meeting at an international conference in Bratislava,
Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Vilayat Quliyev said in an interview with
ATV on his return home last night.

Speaking about the details of the talks, Mr Quliyev said that the
Armenian side was to blame for the fact that the presidents of the two
countries failed to meet in Bratislava.

[Reporter over video of the conference] During the informal meeting
with Vilayat Quliyev in Bratislava, Armenian Foreign Minister Vardan
Oskanyan failed to substantiate his accusations against the Baku
government. Some time ago, Oskanyan described as groundless Mr
Quliyev’s statement that the talks on the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict
should start from scratch. He stressed the importance of the talks in
Paris and Key West and said that if need be, he could submit the
papers to the Azerbaijani foreign minister.

[Vilayat Quliyev, in office] I reminded him of his statement and told
him to show me the papers. He said that he would send them by fax on
his return to Yerevan. I asked whether the papers had been signed. He
said he did not have signed papers. I said – if there are no signed
papers, then what kind of agreement could we talk about?

[Reporter] The minister said the Bratislava conference was a good
opportunity for a meeting between the Azerbaijani and Armenian
presidents and pointed out that this did not happen precisely because
of the Armenian side.

[Vilayat Quliyev] The Armenian president first declared his intention
to go to Bratislava. His name was on the programme. But when
Azerbaijan also declared that it would be represented in Bratislava by
the president, the Armenian side immediately changed its mind. This
shows that the Armenian president is not ready for such a meeting or
avoids it.

[Reporter] Vilayat Quliyev also said that Vardan Oskanyan, who levels
new accusations against Baku in the Armenian press every day, looked
much milder at the meeting. Quote, such statements were not voiced at
our meeting and they could not be voiced because it is only Armenia
which is responsible for the conflict situation in the region, end
quote.

Return of occupied lands only solution to Karabakh – Azeri leader

Return of occupied lands only solution to Karabakh – Azeri leader

Arminfo
20 Mar 04

YEREVAN

The only solution to the Karabakh conflict is the return of all the
lands controlled by the Armenian side and Karabakh, after which the
sides can sit at a negotiating table, Azerbaijani President Ilham
Aliyev said in an interview with [Armenian] Noyan Tapan news agency,
Armenian Public TV has reported.

Commenting on the murder of an Armenian officer in Hungary by an
Azerbaijani serviceman, Ilham Aliyev noted that he was surprised at
the fuss raised over the incident: “I cannot understand how a one-off
incident can be turned into an international scandal, while Azerbaijan
is keeping quiet about the killing of its servicemen on the
Armenian-Azerbaijani border.” Aliyev Jr said that Armenian snipers
killed 20 Azerbaijani servicemen on the border in 2003.

Georgian leader offers help in Karabakh settlement

Georgian leader offers help in Karabakh settlement

Arminfo
20 Mar 04

YEREVAN

The major problem in the South Caucasus is the Nagornyy Karabakh
conflict, Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili said in an interview
with [Armenian] Noyan Tapan news agency, Armenian Public TV has
reported.

Mikheil Saakashvili stressed that Georgia was ready to render any
possible assistance for the speediest settlement of the Karabakh
conflict. But only Armenia and Azerbaijan can resolve it once and for
all, Saakashvili said.

Natural dyes trigger renaissance for Oriental rugs in home decor

MONDAY March 22, 2004
Natural dyes trigger renaissance for Oriental rugs in home decor

By Glen Elsasser
Knight Ridder News Service

WASHINGTON — To the delight and enthusiasm of dealers, collectors
and many homeowners, Oriental rugs are beginning to reclaim their
status as the monarchs of home decoration, accompanied by a revival of
natural dyes and hand-spun wool.

Some see this as a way to dispel once and for all the so-called
Dark Ages of rugmaking. In the early part of the 20th century,
chemical dyes began to dominate and, in the opinion of many, to lower
the quality of hand-woven rugs.

The results were not always easy on the eyes of this ancient craft’s
aficionados.

And over the past 20 years, “prices for the very best pieces have
gone up while the market has softened for middle- and lower-end
examples,” said Wendel Swan, of Alexandria, Va., a collector who has
lectured at Washington’s Textile Museum and an official of the 10th
International Conference on Oriental Carpets. The conference, founded
in London in 1976, is dedicated to advancing the knowledge of carpets
and handmade textiles with sessions featuring scholarly lectures and
an exhibition.

“Thirty years ago,” Swan added, “you couldn’t buy a new rug with
the color or quality of wool of an antique.”

But all that has changed. In the 1970s, Harald Bohmer, a German
chemist who taught in Turkey for a number of years, rediscovered the
plants used for the ingredients of the old natural dyes, the staple of
rugmaking prior to 1860.

With the sponsorship of the School of Fine Arts in Istanbul, Bohmer
organized the Natural Dye Research and Development Project, a
profit-sharing cooperative known by the Turkish acronym DOBAG.

The first beneficiaries of DOBAG were villagers in western Turkey
who began using plant roots and insects again as sources of dyes in
what would usher in the modern renaissance in rug weaving.

“The designs were based on the patterns of their nomadic ancestors
from hundreds of years ago,” said Bill McDonnell, who operates a San
Francisco rug emporium called Return to Tradition.

The exclusive U.S. dealer for DOBAG, O’Donnell emphasized that
each rug has a spontaneity, carrying the initials of the weaver as
well as the symbol of the village where it originated. DOBAG carpets
come in all sizes and cost roughly $60 a square foot.

The DOBAG project produces about 1,600 rugs a year, O’Donnell
said, half of which go to the United States. “Perhaps one of the
weaker points of the project is that they can’t crank up their
production,” he said. “It’s a very pure form of cottage industry, and
rug buyers like that limited availability.”

Europeans, notably British and Germans, have been familiar players
since the 19th century in establishing workshops overseas that
produced handmade rugs for export that were simpatico with Western
homes. One of the most prominent of these firms was Ziegler & Co.,
which had headquarters in Manchester, England, and made highly
regarded rugs in Turkey and Iran using natural dyes and hand-spun wool
more than a century ago.

But among those leading the current revival is an American, George
Jevremovic, who along with his former wife established the
Philadelphia-based company Woven Legends in 1981.

“DOBAG was a catalyst, a stepping stone for us,” said Jevremovic,
who enlisted native Turkish weavers skilled at reproducing traditional
patterns.

Woven Legends has sought to encourage weavers to produce
one-of-a-kind pieces rather than reproduce centuries-old carpet gems.

“The idea was to go to the weavers who were very skilled at
traditional patterns and urge them to make personal statements about
themselves — their weddings, landscapes — and create a folk-life
carpet,” Jevremovic said.

“Probably two-thirds of what is done is an open-ended experiment.”

With the advent of the computer, other U.S. dealers have followed
Jevremovic’s example and have become directly involved in the
production ofcarpets in far-flung places such as China, Pakistan,
India and Nepal, where Tibetan refugees make unique hand-knotted
pieces in designs distinct from Middle East examples.

While natural dyes have become commonplace in contemporary
Oriental rugs, many of today’s handmade rugs and textiles often mix
synthetic with natural dyes. Armen Babaian, a third-generation dealer
in Milwaukee, said certain reds or blues come from natural dyes while
blacks are generally made from synthetics.

It was the cheap aniline dyes that transformed once
“fantastic-looking” Turkish rugs, for example, into a sorry sight,
according to Emmett Eiland, author of Oriental Rugs Today: A Guide to
the Best New Carpets from the East (Berkeley Hills Books, 216 pages,
$34.95). “The purple would fade and run to nothing, while the orange
would stay orange.”

Eiland also mentioned “the eccentric colors” that infused Chinese
rugmaking, especially in the 1920s and 1930s with the popularity of
the ArtDeco style. While such notable decorators and craftsmen as
Louis Comfort Tiffanywere genuinely enthusiastic about the more
traditional Chinese rugs, the Chinesesaw rugmaking essentially as a
moneymaking operation.

By the early 1960s, the classic designs of Persia, the Caucasus,
China and Afghanistan were being reproduced by expert weavers in India
and Pakistan.

“Salesmen from New York would show up with rugs of the same design
year after year, and it became boring,” Eiland said.

At the same time, the collecting and veneration of antique rugs
thrived not only in the museum world but also in domestic settings.

During the Cold War, the United States remained a storehouse of
antique rugs and a favorite haunt of foreign dealers and their agents
in search of bargains. The reason for this abundance of treasures:
Beginning in the late19th century, Gilded Age prosperity nurtured a
new taste for luxury among the increasingly cosmopolitan homemakers in
booming metropolises such as New York, Chicago, Philadelphia and
Boston.

But as the prices of antique pieces skyrocketed, wall-to-wall
carpeting or machine-made rugs in Oriental designs became the floor
coverings of choice.

Carpets lacking an antique pedigree often wound up being offered for
sale as “estate rugs” rather than simply “used rugs.” Today, consumers
confront the challenge of frequent “going out of business” sales,
often a ploy for selling off rugs of lesser quality.

But even as we move out of the Dark Ages into this Oriental
rugmaking renaissance, Jevremovic admitted that the new handmade rugs
may not appeal to everyone.

“A lot of our rugs go to people who are worldly and well-traveled,
often with an art background,” he said. “They have a special
presence. Some people may like them in a gallery or a museum but not
want to live with them.”

Copyright 2004, The Salt Lake Tribune.

Haigazian: English Speaking Union Leb. March 22

March 22, 2004
CONTACT : Loucia Isaac Seropian
Phone: 961-1-353010 Ext.: 365
Email: [email protected]

Haigazian University-Public Relations Office
PO Box: 11-1748Beirut, Lebanon

International Public Speaking Competition 2004- Lebanon

“A Borderless World” interpreted by nine young Lebanese University Students

The English- Speaking Union Lebanon branch (ESU (held its annual
International Public Speaking competition Saturday, March 20, at Haigazian
University-Auditorium, Hamra, Beirut-Lebanon. partaking in the event were
nine student contestants representing local universities in Lebanon and
aged between 18-20 in full-education.

The event was organized by the ESU Chairwoman Mrs. Mrs. Youmna Asseily and
attended by the Haigazian University president the Rev. Dr. Paul
Haidostian, the Dean of Arts and Sciences Dr. Arda Ekmekji and a
distinguished jury which included, H.E. British Ambassador, Mr. James Watt,
Dr. Nasser Saidi, former Deputy Central Bank Governor, Dr. Waleed Khoury
principal of Broumana high school, Mr. Tarek Muhmood HSBC representative
and Dr. Shereen Khairallah the Chairwoman of the English Department at
Haigazian University.

A few minutes before the competition, Mrs. Asseily lined up the contestants
out side the auditorium premises, in a non-competitive atmosphere
introducing them to the previous years’ participants attending the 2004
competition in support of the ESU’s mission in a “family atmosphere.”

” A Borderless World” was this year’s Public -Speaking competition theme.
With much self-reliance, all contestants successfully managed to tackle
their topic using different perspectives. Coincidentally, all participants
were females. With no microphones installed or made available for any of
the contestants, a rule regulated by the ESU, the majority managed to
explore the theme and inspire the jury and the audience.

The sequence of thoughts, flow of information, clear voice projection,
attitude and presence exercised by the contestants showed their eagerness
to win the competition making their families and University even more proud.

Using English as a second Language, the “English skills” and the “English
standards used by the 9 participants left “positive impressions” on H.E.
Mr. James Watt. The British Ambassador was delighted to see the Lebanese
youth “incorporated in extra-curricular- academic activities promoted by
the English Speaking Union,” adding: ” I am very appreciative of being
appointed part of the jury for this specific event.”

Theoretically, according to the speeches addressed by the contestants, a
borderless world meant, “breaking mental barrier and walls.” However, one
young participant thought, ” The whole concept of this borderless world is
a ‘pure myth’ and argued accordingly. Another contestant debated and
discussed the importance of, ” building bridges through education, love and
a mutual respect.”

Very true to the theme, all participants pondered on the concept of
globalization. Explicitly, all contestants favored a “borderless world”,
which, for them, is in pure conjunction with the experience of
globalization. Their concern was to urge the audience to experiment and
decipher the venues of globalization in terms of economy and political
agendas.
Inevitably the participants shared mutual concerns regarding “Learning
corporate languages, involving the youth in major decisions and plans,
hiring qualified and skilled professionals in all domain mainly translators
and interpreters especially of supreme importance for the west.”

Virtually some implicitly deliberated, borderless or not, the foundation of
the world should be based on “cherishing human values, respecting the
other, accessing knowledge, technology, safe-guarding identities and
cultures in tune with the rapid developments undertaking the world at large.”

According to Youmna Aseily, the ESU Chairwoman, this activity, which
involves the youth of Lebanon “is aimed to give young people experience in
the fundamental skills of public speaking, to give
International Public Speaking Competition 2004- Lebanon

Students, from a variety of countries and backgrounds, a chance to meet,
exchange views and form friendships and to provide a focus for the learning
of effective English and communication skills among young people in
countries where English is not the first Language.”

Moreover, ” The first annual ESU public -Speaking event was held in 1981
where only three countries participated. Today, and with much content,
Asseily assures the number of countries around the world participating in
this events has exceeded 50 all in all.” Concluding she said, “In 2002 a
young Lebanese student came second in the competition attended by
participants from over 35 countries, two others from different countries
tied the knot.” she concluded.

The names of the two winners, Nayla Habr from Notre Dame University (NDU)
and Lauren Eid from Balamand University was announced by H.E. the British
Ambassador Mr. Watt. The two-winners will be traveling to participate in
the headquarters International Public Speaking Competition at Dartmouth
House in London, May 2004. The rest of the participants were given a
special gift souvenir by the ESU-Lebanon.

The International Public Speaking Competition is an annual event program
run by the English-Speaking Union and Sponsored by HSBC Holdings plc in
some 42 active countries in the World.

###
Loucia Isaac Seropian

Photo caption: Right Asseily, Khairallah, Habre, Eid, British Ambssador,
HSBC representative, Khalf, Khoury

END
Photo caption: Right Asseily, Khairallah, Habre, Eid, British Ambssador,
HSBC representative, Khalf, Khoury

Alleged Bomb Not Found

A1 Plus | 17:45:22 | 22-03-2004 | Politics |

ALLEGED BOMB NOT FOUND

Police station of Armenian capital’s Centre district received a call Monday
morning saying there in a bomb in Mashtots Avenue’s building No 48, the site
of Eurofootball and other offices.

It became clear after an hour of searching conducted by the police that the
call was false.

http://www.a1plus.am

Canada Prelacy: Response to Canada Diocese communiqué

PRESS OFFICE
Armenian Prelacy of Canada
3401 Olivar Asselin
Montreal, Quebec H4J 1L5
514-856-1200 TEL
514-856-1805 FAX
e-mail: [email protected]

COMMUNIQUE

(IN RESPONSE TO A MISLEADING COMMUNIQUE)

It was with a deep sense of surprise and disappointment that we
read the communiqué which was recently put into circulation in the name of
the Diocese of the Armenian Church of Canada (Etchmiadzin). Through the
premeditated distortion of well-established historical facts, misinformation
and baised conclusions, this Communique attempts to create an atmosphere of
confusion and tension within the Armenian community as well as non-Armenian
circles.

We do not wish to engage in a senseless and harmful public
debate. Nevertheless for the sake of truth we wish to present the following
facts to our people:

A. Our community, which in fact represents the majority of Armenians in
Canada, has never been a part of the Diocese of the Armenian Church of
Canada (Etchmiadzin) either by way of churches, educational institutions or
other organizations.
B. Our community along with all of its aforementioned structures was
always an organic and integral part of the Prelacy of the Armenian Apostolic
Church of the Eastern United States and Canada (Cilicia).
C. “The Prelacy of the Eastern United States and Canada” had its
headquarters in New York. Beginning in 1997, a Canadian Vicarage together
with a Vice-Prelate was established in Montreal, which during the ensuing
years officially received Their Holinesses of Blessed Memory Vazken I and
Karekin I and His Holiness Karekin II Catholicoi of the Holy See
Etchmiadzin, as well as Their Holinesses of Blessed Memory Khoren I and
Karekin II and His Holiness Aram I, Catholicoi of the Holy See of Cilicia.
D. Considering that the “Prelacy of the Eastern United States and
Canada” was divided geographically between two different countries, certain
practical problems coupled with the ever-growing needs of the Armenians in
Canada, compelled the higher authorities of the Prelacy to separate Canada,
which was already endowed with its own By-laws and diocesan structures, from
the “Prelacy of the Eastern United States and Canada” and render it fully
autonomous. For the record with the same reasoning, an identical decision
was implemented in 1984 by the Diocese of the Armenian Church of the Eastern
United Staes and Canada (Etchmiadzin).
E. In 2002 the National Representative Assembly of the Canadian Prelacy
elected a Prelate according to its by-laws, giving to the Catholicossal
Vicar the title of Prelate.
F. Despite the fact that the election was legitimate and was the
natural consequence of internal administrative reorganization, His Holiness
Catholicos Aram I, motivated by the desire to enhance the cooperation
between our Prelacy and the Diocese, advised our Prelate-elect, not to use
his title, and continue to keep that of Catholicosal Vicar.
G. However, the good will shown by His Holiness, the Catholicosal Vicar,
as well as the Executive Council and all affiliated bodies and
organizations, unfortunately was not reciprocated in the same spirit by the
Primate and diocesan authorities.

Therefore, it is a plain fact that a new Prelacy was not established as the
Communique of Diocese and some circles attempt to portray in order to incite
provocation and misunderstanding in our community and in the Diaspora at
large. The fact is that this was simply an internal administrative
reorganization within an existing Prelacy and diocesan structures.

We do not wish to state anything further. We simply wanted to bring the
aforementioned facts to the attention of our community and those interested.
We are grieved by the spirit demonstrated by the Diocese and the misleading
conclusions of the Communique.

This is our statement and stand. We remain firmly committed to cooperation.
We will not respond to any further negative expressions directed at us.
Rather we will continue unswervingly to serve our people, the Armenian
Apostolic Church, our Fatherland, the Armenian Cause, Armenian education and
culture under the auspices of the Catholicosate of the Great House of
Cilica.

###

Resettlement As True Guarantee Of Rebuilding The Motherland

RESETTLEMENT AS TRUE GUARANTEE OF REBUILDING THE MOTHERLAND

Azat Artsakh – Republic of Nagorno Karabakh (NKR)
22-03-2004

“The settlement of Nagorni Karabakh territories of strategic
importance is a national problem therefore the world-spread Armenians
are interested in the regulation of the problem,” said the chairman of
the public organization “The Promised Land” Vahram Gevorgian. Since
2003 the organization has directed its activities towards the
implementation of the settlement of Artsakh. In 2003with the
assistance of Armenian benefactors from America the school building
was built and furnished in the historical village Tsar 20 km from the
region Karvachar (now Shahoumian). The school of Tsar started
operating from October 23, 2003. Presently nine families live in the
village. “The construction of the school means the revival of the
village. The building of the school was necessary as many families
refused to settle here for the absence of school. I hope after the
opening of the school the flow of settlers will grow,” mentioned V!
ahram Gevorgian. In historical Tsar there were three churches. One of
them was ruined by the Azerbaijanis, and the stones were used to build
an Azerbaijani school. The other two churches were turned into
cattle-sheds. “The PromisedLand” intends to reconstruct the churches
and found a scientific research center in the Azerbaijani school built
on the Armenian khachcars. A film about Tsar was shot which was shown
in a number of foreign countries, an as a result the funding of school
building. In the military village Araler the school building was ready
on September 8, 2003 but it was opened later, on March 1, 2004. The
school was built and furnished again by foreign benefactors. The
school has27 pupils. Before the children of the officers had to go to
school in the village Arakel of Hadrout region situated 15 km
far. Presently a small hospital is being built in Araler, which will
be for both the soldiers settling the village and the other
settlers. In the! village Knaravan of the region Shahoumian it is
planned to bu! ild a school, the village administration building, a
club and a surgery in 2004. Twelve housed have been built in Knaravan,
this year this number will grow. The nursery school was built in
Yeghegnut, which will start operating in one or two months. “There is
a big project for the resettlement of the village of Arevshat. For six
years already the settlers have been living in hard social
conditions. In 2004 it is planned to build the building of the village
administration, a surgery, 8 houses,” mentioned V. Gevorgian adding
many new settlers left the village because of the indifference of
competent bodies. Unfortunately, the same situation was in
Tsamdzor. The settlement of the village was carried out by the public
organization “France-Karabakh” and because of the indifference of the
competent body emigration started from this strategic
settlement. According to V. Gevorgian, to stop the emigration from the
village there is a project to repair th! e school building, etc. “We
have also a program of economic development for the mentioned
settlements. Settlement does not only mean building. First of all the
social problems of the settlers should be solved: the problem of work
and employment, etc. According to the agreement with benefactors, a
sheep-breeding center will be opened in the village, we have farming
projects, etc.,” mentioned the head of the organization, and added
that in some villages cultural projects will be brought into being as
well. In the village Ijevanatun the “Old Inn” used to operate before
providing the trade with Iran. The building was passed to the
organization for ten years, and it is planned to open a center of
historical and cultural research on the liberation territories. “We
have the plan of repairing the school building of the village
Arakel. The school was built by the organization “France-Karabakh” in
1994. In 2004 we ! must implement the construction of the nursery
schoolin Talis! h and the settlement of the village Akn,” said the
head of the organization “The Promised Land” Vahan Gevorgian.

NVARD OHANJANIAN.
22-03-2004

Discussions Continue

DISCUSSIONS CONTINUE

Azat Artsakh – Republic of Nagorno Karabakh (NKR)
22-03-2004

Presently the question of introducing the 12-year educational system
is discussed. According to the Minister of Education of NKR Armen
Sarghissian,the introduction of this system in Armenia and NKR is
still a question to be discussed, trying to find out its advantages
and disadvantages. In Armenia a number of documents have been drawn
up, in particular, “The Main Principles of the Conceptual State
Secondary Education System”. According to Armen Sarghissian, the
advantage of the 12-year secondary education is that in the upper
classes the pupils will have the opportunity of specialization, and
thus favourable conditions will be provided for the pupils who will
want to proceed with higher education. This system will also bring
about problems. The children will goto school at the age of
6. Therefore much work has to be done for establishing primary
education institutions. The teachers with necessary specialization
will change to the nursery schools. In the! end the minister added
that especially in the education system reforms must be done with
special care as it is a conservative system in the positive sense of
the word, a mechanism created in the course of years and rapid changes
will cause failure. Because the reform will be effective in the case
of correct planning and funding. If anything is done with faults, the
reform, even the best idea will fail.

LILIT ASRIAN.
22-03-2004