Interfax
March 17 2004

ACP net profit up 170% in 2003

Yerevan. (Interfax) – Net profit at the metallurgy company Armenian
Copper Program in 2003 amounted to 762.7 million dram, up 170% from
283.6 million dram in 2002, a source in the company told Interfax.

Sales revenue last year amounted to 7.25 billion dram, up from 6.04
billion dram in 2002, the source said.

Production of blister copper at the company fell from 8,500 tonnes in
2002 to 6,270 tonnes last year.

ZAO ACP was set up in 1997 based on the Alaverdi Mining and
Metallurgical Combine, which was liquidated in 1989. ACP charter
capital amounts to 3.1 billion dram. Liechtenstein registered Vallex
FM Establishment owns 53.7% of the company’s shares and Switzerland’s
Elecom – 46.3%.

The official exchange rate on March 16 was 562.3 dram to the dollar.

Baku Today, Azerbaijan
March 17 2004

Minsk group will present new proposals for Karabakh at meeting of FMs

Baku Today 17/03/2004 12:47

Azerbaijani and Armenian foreign ministers will meet in Prague by the
end of March according to Turan News Agency.

OSCE Minsk group chairmen are to present new proposals for peaceful
settlement of Nagorno Karabakh conflict between Armenia and
Azerbaijan, according to the 525th newspaper.

The timing of the meeting between Azerbaijani and Armenian presidents
is still to be arranged, said Trend News Agency.

PRESS RELEASE
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia
Contact: Information Desk
Tel: (374-1) 52-35-31
Email: [email protected]
Web:

MINISTER OSKANIAN ADDRESSES 60TH SESSION OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION

Minister Vartan Oskanian addressed the 60TH SESSION OF THE COMMISSION ON
HUMAN RIGHTS in GENEVA on 16 MARCH. On the occasion of this meeting,
foreign ministers from 70 countries addressed the Commission on global and
local human rights issues and concerns.

Less than a week after a terrorist attack resulted in massive deaths and
injuries in Spain, the Minister called for unity in implementing the ideas
that are shared in order to make possible democratic systems which breed
stability and protect the human rights of all mankind.

In his statement, Minister Oskanian reflected on the links between human
rights and development explaining that many of today¹s social and economic
ills can be resolved if human rights are accepted, absorbed, respected and
implemented as inarguable, inalienable, unalterable rights.

He spoke about Armenia’s commitment to the Human Rights agenda, Armenia’s
accmplishments over these 10 years, including the abolition of the death
penalty and the appointment of an ombudsman, and reforms in legislation. The
Minister cited the recent killing of an Armenian soldier in Budapest by an
Azerbaijani soldier as example of ethnic hatred. He explained that today’s
grievances in the region are the results of human rights abuses and called
on the international community to recognize the Karabakh population’s
inherent basic human right to self-determination.

Withiin the margins of the Commission Session, the Minister held a series of
important bilateral meetings. Below is the complete text of the statement.

STATEMENT BY THE MINISTER FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF ARMENIA
MR. VARTAN OSKANIAN

60TH SESSION OF THE COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
GENEVA, 15-16 MARCH 2004

Mr. Chairman, the first time I addressed this forum seven years ago, Armenia
was not yet a member of the Council of Europe, was not a member of this
Commission, and the responsibilities and obligations facing us appeared
overwhelming. Today, as I take stock of where we were and how far we¹ve
come, I am pleased to say that Armenia has had a role to play in the efforts
to promote, espouse, advocate, even celebrate human rights. The freedoms
enjoyed in many countries, the freedoms that make some societies the envy of
the world, are the right of each individual man, woman and child. As
societies and governments represented here, we gather to reaffirm our
commitments and to continue the search for ways to make those ideals real.

This 60th session is symbolic of all our hard-learned lessons. The struggle
to articulate, explain, codify, legislate, impose, ensure human rights in
each society has been both international and local. We wish to achieve
universal access to and guarantee of human rights for all the world¹s
citizens. Whether motivated by altruism or enlightened self-interest, we
want the same civil liberties for the old and new democracies, the big and
small powers, the developed and developing nations. As a new democracy, a
small country following the path to development, we know that what happens
inside countries – large and small — can have and has had, a huge effect on
the rest of the world.

While symbols should not be mistaken for substance, they should not be
dismissed as insubstantial, either. The gains that we have made are
testimony to the truism that what is right is also good. Many of today¹s
social ills, and the economic ones, too, will be well on their way to
disappearing if human rights are accepted, absorbed, respected and
implemented as inarguable, inalienable, unalterable rights.

This is why older democracies – having suffered first-hand the risks of
civil societies which do not extend human rights protections — are
determined to instill good governance mechanisms around the world. That is
why international organizations include the human dimension as a significant
component of their security concerns. That is why the terror of terrorism
has imposed discussions of the elimination of human rights violations as
solutions.

The driving force is not just philosophy and idealism but also politics and
pragmatism. Societies which respect the human rights of their own people are
more likely to respect the rights of their neighbors. Countries which
acknowledge that national aspirations can be given their just dues without
resorting to violence or aggression are the kinds of societies in which we
ourselves wish to live, and which we all want at our borders. Those among us
who can confront remembered wrongs without committing new ones will have
earned the right to call ourselves modern, inclusive, tolerant, neighborly.

That is what we want for our neighborhood.

>From the Caspian to the Black Sea, the Caucasus, the South Caucasus, the
Northern Middle East is a cauldron of constant dynamic change, geopolitical
fermentation, domestic and sub regional threats, and multi-power interest
and competition. An uneven distribution of resources, mixed with a bumpy
path to regional development and cooperation makes good governance based on
a respect for individual rights even more critical for the interests of
governments and citizens alike. We know that this requires a determination
generated inside our societies. It necessitates intellectual and practical
conversions that go beyond our international commitments.

Towards this end, the comments, observations and even admonitions of various
countries and international organizations on our human rights
accomplishments and goals is acknowledged, and appreciated. We know that
this is a win-win struggle, where what is good for Armenia is also good for
the region. But we also know that preaching democracy is no substitute for
the sustained efforts essential to create a healthy society, which in turn
will guarantee the health of the state. We are ready to work with all those
who comprehend the natural process of maturation needed for these changes to
be authentic and deep-rooted, not cosmetic and short-lived.

In Armenia, where human rights has been on our collective agenda for just
one sixth of these 60 years, changes have already begun to take root. This
year, the death penalty was abolished. The inherent right to life is now
guaranteed for all our citizens. Just a few months ago, an ombudsman was
appointed to hear grievances and facilitate solutions.

Armenia¹s minority populations, although small in number, continue to enjoy
the government¹s attention and equal protections under the law.

Trafficking, an emergent global evil, is the object of an interagency plan
to eradicate the local conditions and mechanisms that enable this crime.

The National Plan of Action for Children was approved to coordinate
Armenia¹s obligations and programs for children – a vulnerable group whose
basic quality of life indicators are paradoxical, just like those of their
parents. Our kids are the victims of drastic and still incomplete economic
and social transitions. Their access to nutrition and medicine is sometimes
in jeopardy, but not to culture and education. This same dilemma is at the
root of our implementation of the Millennium Development Goals, which when
met, will go farther than any declaration to protect the basic rights of
each individual citizen.

Just as those goals are still not completely met, neither are programs to
grow an independent judiciary. The road plan is there, but we still have far
to travel. We are working with the Council of Europe on judicial and
electoral reforms. The same is true for a fully participatory transparent
legislative process. The existence of laws does not mean that their
implementation is full and comprehensive. Our laws on press freedoms
continue to be reformed in line with Council of Europe standards. We are
committed to arriving at improved legislation. But we also know that
legislatively facilitated press freedoms have still not resulted in an
intellectually and fiscally free and responsible press.

That we can even make these lists, and slowly cross off some of the items
listed there, is ample indication that we are fully engaged in one of
society¹s hardest tasks: to equally and broadly allocate the rights,
privileges, benefits of human civilization.

But, Mr. Chairman, the world is not there yet. Even as the world champions
human rights, we tolerate excessive human wrongs.

We tolerate atrocities, massacres, ethnic cleansing so long as they happen
in distant lands. We tolerate their memories and approve the deniers. We
tolerate historians who claim that there are circumstances in history that
justify ethnic cleansing and its logical progression, genocide. Armenians
have experienced these inexplicable human wrongs for a hundred years. We who
have suffered these crimes have declared that the best way, the only way to
restore faith and confidence is for perpetrators and victims to acknowledge
the past, and move on to the future. Ironically, it is we the victims who
have and who continue to make these unconditional offers. The perpetrators,
old and new, do not. We do so, moved by a need to restore relations between
peoples who have been and will continue to be neighbors. It is not for
history¹s sake alone that we insist on acknowledging the past, but for the
sake of the future. The political obstacles, the economic blockade that
exist today are left over from an unfinished and unreconciled past. We want
to move on to a collaborative and cooperative future. For that, our
neighbors must sit with us today, in the present, with a will to recover
that which the past has erased.

In our neighborhood, the past is not buried in history. Today¹s grievances
in our region are the consequences, expressions and manifestations of human
rights abuses, not their causes.

There were no refugees and no territorial issues when the people of Nagorno
Karabakh, legally, in accordance with the legislation of the time, followed
all necessary steps, to opt for self-determination. The state abrogated its
responsibility to provide safety and security for its population. Instead,
the response was military aggression.

It is very telling that a sovereign government responded to its people¹s
democratic calls for self-determination with military means. Moreover, the
violent, military response was not directed against the population of
Nagorno Karabakh alone, but also against Armenians in Sumgait and Baku,
miles away from the territory and population of Nagorno Karabakh.

This was ethnic cleansing — the first time that ‘solution’ was brought to
and utilized in the former Soviet space — even before it showed its head in
the Balkans. The Armenians who were driven out were the first refugees in
the former Soviet Union.

Despite Armenians’ continuous victimization, despite recent memories of
pogroms and deportations, despite the continuing fragile defensive,
protective position of Armenians in Nagorno Karabakh, Armenians continue to
express readiness to arrive at some compromise settlement. This is not
diplomatic talk. The Armenians of Nagorno Karabakh have held legitimate
elections, are building a civil society based on legislation which protects
human rights, and are preparing for the day when their own rights to
self-determination and a life of peace and dignity will be recognized.

Mr. Chairman,
Unfortunately, the past is not behind us. Earlier this month, in Budapest,
in a North Atlantic Cooperation Council training program, the concept of
cooperation was shockingly shaken by the murder of an Armenian soldier by an
Azerbaijani officer. This expression of ethnic hatred is more than
disturbing, as we continue to search for solutions that will allow us to
coexist in peace in this region.

That is why we continue to call on our neighbors to join us in searching for
ways to go forward. In a complex, problematic neighborhood, heavily burdened
with history, we know full well that human rights, when equally and
indiscriminately protected, will mean the ability to protect the safety,
security and dignity of entire populations, whole countries and regions. It
truly does start with each country, one person at a time.

Mr. Chairman,

We wish to join in welcoming Justice Louise Arbour to her new position as
the new High Commissioner for Human Rights. We would have wished her good
luck even had this meeting taken place a week ago, and we do so, even more,
today. In the wake of the shocking, frightening, inexplainable horror that
hit Spain and the world just a few days ago, I must repeat that which we all
know: there is a way to beat the terrorism, to defeat those who are bent on
destroying a way of life. That way is to unite in implementing the ideas
which we all hold dear, in making possible the democratic systems which
breed stability, in protecting the human rights of all mankind so that we
never again need to protect ourselves from ourselves.

Thank you.

PRESS RELEASE
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia
Contact: Information Desk
Tel: (374-1) 52-35-31
Email: [email protected]
Web:

Minister Oskanian Meets with Irish Presidency of the EU, Discusses Caucasus
Inclusion in the EU Wider Europe Initiative

Within the margins of the 60th Session of the Commission on Human Rights in
Geneva on March 16, Minister of Foreign Affairs Vartan Oskanian met with
Brian Cowen, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ireland. Minister Oskanian
reiterated Armenia’s hope that during the Irish presidency of the European
Union, the EU would consider the inclusion of the Caucasus in the EU’s Wider
Europe New Neighborhood Initiative. The two agreed that such a symbolic move
would benefit relations within the Caucasus as well as between the Caucasus
and the EU.

The Minister also met with the foreign ministers of Switzerland, Estonia,
Luxembourg and the Deputy Foreign Minister of Italy. Minister Oskanian also
visited with UN Geneva Office General Director Sergei Orjonikidze.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 17, 2004
Contact: Linda Yepoyan

Phone: 610-408-0988
Email: [email protected]
URL:

Birthright Armenia: Journey of Self Discovery

While young adults are deciding how best to spend their summer,
Birthright Armenia is actively recruiting on both sides of the ocean for
an influx of young diasporans from around the globe, who are ready to
start a journey of self-discovery in Armenia. Birthright Armenia is an
ideal match for young diasporans, 18-32 years old, who seek personal and
professional enrichment through what promises to be a life changing
experience.

Birthright Armenia is proposing an innovative and forward thinking
concept that begins with young diasporans, who are traveling to Armenia
with one of the many established service oriented programs, including:
Armenian Assembly of America, Armenian Students Association-NY, Armenian
Volunteer Corps, Armenian Youth Federation, ACYOA, Canadian Youth
Mission to Armenia, Fund for Armenian Relief, Land and Culture
Organization, and Habitat for Humanity Armenia. For those who are
interested in extending their stay in Armenia beyond their program’s end
date – making their sojourn to Armenia a minimum of eight
weeks-Birthright Armenia is providing community service placement,
Eastern Armenian language instruction, weekly seminars, fun-filled
excursions, and homestay living arrangements with local Armenian
families. The bonus, in addition to these valuable offerings, is that
Birthright Armenia reimburses each participant who takes advantage of
the in-country extension the cost of their entire roundtrip airfare,
paid back upon successful completion of the program. Each of the
organizations in the list above enthusiastically embraces and supports
Birthright Armenia’s mission, objectives and program services, and is
hoping to increase their constituency base as a result of Birthright
Armenia’s incentives.

For a brief overview of each organization offering a youth oriented
program to Armenia for the summer of 2004, interested individuals can
visit Birthright Armenia’s Web site and click on “Program Offerings in
Armenia”. It is here that young adults are introduced to the multitude
of organizations, their missions, trip offerings, timeframes, program
costs and contact information for each, in one centralized spot.

“I have felt there was untapped potential in expanding the experiences
in Armenia in the journey to and connecting with the homeland. Instead
of creating a new organization from scratch, which is so often the case,
I decided to support the existing organizations, allowing them to
realize all the dreams they have for their programs and what they can
become”, says Birthright Armenia Founder, Edele Hovnanian. “For me, it
is critical for both the Diaspora and for Armenia to have our youth
fully connected to the homeland in a very positive way, so they can
develop into future leaders and have a positive impact on our community.
Given the millions of people we have in the Diaspora, and just a few
hundred young adults joining in on the programs annually, our goal is to
increase that number tenfold”, adds Hovnanian.

One of Birthright Armenia’s guiding principles is the belief that all
experiences in Armenia should encourage immersion into the native
population instead of viewing it from the outside. In addition to
encouraging homestays with Armenian families over hotel living,
Birthright Armenia is facilitating basic language fluency prior to and
during trips to ensure each participant gets the most out of their
experience and truly immerses themselves into the local flavor of the
country. The organization has supported the development of a computer
assisted Eastern Armenian language course, which will be available free
of charge on the Birthright Armenia Web site starting April 15, 2004.
For each Birthright Armenia participant, the learning begins
pre-departure with an interactive on-line tutorial, complete with
on-line testing capability focusing on speaking, reading and listening
skills. The program includes 10 on-line lessons, which cover pretests,
grammar, vocabulary, dialogues, reading exercises, and tests to gauge
progress.

For those interested in learning more about how to make a difference in
Armenia and build new relationships that last a lifetime, please visit
our Web site at The site describes what
programs and opportunities are available to young diasporans this
summer, as well as Birthright Armenia’s offerings, eligibility criteria,
and application materials.

Birthright Armenia’s mission is to strengthen ties between the homeland
and diasporan youth by affording them an opportunity to be a part of
Armenia’s daily life and to contribute to Armenia’s development through
work, study and volunteer experiences, while developing life-long
personal ties and a renewed sense of Armenian identity.

# # #

CENN – MARCH 17, 2004 REGIONAL DAILY DIGEST
Table of Contents:
1. Announcements
1.1. Information-Theoretic Methods in Data Analysis
1.2. Invitation to Participate in the Web Discussion
1.3. The Russian Translation of the “NGO Strategy Conference: Making Our
Environment Work for Children’s Health”

2. Georgia
2.1. Georgians Demand Action to Save Their Homes from Oil Pipeline

3. Azerbaijan
3.1. Kazakhstan will Transport Gas Through Azerbaijan
3.2. Azerbaijan Expects Baku-Erzerum Gas Pipeline to Open in 2006
3.3. Baku Hopes for Rapid Adoption of Caspian Convention
3.4. Azerbaijan Participates in Berlin International Tourist Exhibition

4. Armenia
4.1. Armenia Looks for Alternative Energy Sources
4.2. EU Offers Armenia 100 Million Euros To Shut Down Nuclear Plant
4.3. Living in Yerevan Becomes Hazardous, NGO Says

1. ANNOUNCEMENTS
1.1. INFORMATION-THEORETIC METHODS IN DATA ANALYSIS
A 2-day Short course, May 26-27, 2004
Offered by Dr. David R. Anderson

This short course introduces a variety of general methods for data
analysis based on Kullback-Leibler Information. The sessions focus on
science hypotheses, models, and model selection methods such as AIC and
AICc.

After introducing important background material, methods are provided to
make formal statistical inference from more than a single model
(multimodel inference). The material is not deeply mathematical; the
emphasis is on science concepts and philosophy and a variety of examples
are provided.

The short course is based on the recent book, Burnham, K. P., and D. R.
Anderson. 2002 Model selection and multimodel inference. 2nd Ed.,
Springer-Verlag, New York, NY 488pp. The short course will be held in
Fort Collins, Colorado.

Additional details and registration form are provided at:

1.2. INVITATION TO PARTICIPATE IN THE WEB DISCUSSION
Dear Colleagues,

On March 18, 2004 from 18:00 to 20:00 Society `For Sustainable
Development’ with the technical support of the IREX Azerbaijan Branch
will hold electronic forum on `Education for Sustainable Development’
dedicated to the UN decade devoted to the Education for Sustainable
Development.

Forum will be held on the following address: http:

We invite you to participate in this web discussion

1.3. THE RUSSIAN TRANSLATION OF THE “NGO STRATEGY CONFERENCE: MAKING OUR
ENVIRONMENT WORK FOR CHILDREN’S HEALTH”
Dear Colleagues,

The Russian translation of the documents of “NGO strategy conference:
making our environment work for children’s health” (Brussels, December
2003, organized by European Public Health Alliance and European
ECO-Forum) is availble at

Click in the very bottom of this page at: “NGO Brussels Statement in
Russian” and “Final NGO Strategy Conference Report in Russian”.

Women in Europe for a Common Future
WECF
Email: [email protected]
Website:

German office:
Tel: +49-89-20232390 Fax: +49-89-20232391
Blumenstrasse 28, D – 80331 Munich
Germany

Dutch office:
Tel: +31-30-2310300 Fax: -2340878
Regulierenring 9, NL – 3981 LA Bunnik
The Netherlands

2. GEORGIA
2.1. GEORGIANS DEMAND ACTION TO SAVE THEIR HOMES FROM OIL PIPELINE

Official complaint to IFC reveals BTC negligence

Tbilisi, Georgia, March 16, 2004 — Residents of Rustavi, Georgia’s
third city, have today submitted an official complaint to the
International Finance Corporation (IFC) concerning the potentially
disastrous construction of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) oil pipeline
only 250 meters from a settlement of high-rise buildings.

[1] The residents are taking this step following a prolonged period of
uncertainty for them and their homes, a lack of information and response
from officials in Georgia and violent intimidation from the regional
police force.

In November 2003, the IFC, the World Bank’s private lending arm, agreed
to provide a USD 250 million loan to the controversial BP-led BTC
project. The residents’ complaint alleges that World Bank Group policies
and procedures have not been complied with on four counts. [2]

In January this year, people in Rustavi learned for the first time
exactly how close the pipeline would come to their homes when heavy
construction equipment and pipeline workers arrived without warning.
There was no mention of such proximity (180-250 meters) in the available
project documentation and maps. The BTC Company (BTC Co) indicates in
its project literature that there should be a 500-meter `security zone’
around the pipeline. It turns out that the pipeline will run along the
nearby Mtkvari river bank, a high level erosion zone, with potentially
destructive impacts on the most affected homes and the 700 families
living there.

Since learning of their plight, the Rustavi residents have sent letters
to and attempted to engage in dialogue with all the relevant parties –
the mayor of Rustavi, local representatives from BTC Co. and the IFC –
and have also taken their case to the Georgian parliament. Their appeals
have been either ignored or dismissed on the grounds that the pipeline
will comply with the highest western standards.

Merab Vacheishvili, one of the residents named in the complaint, said,
`We are told to shut up, stop wasting the company’s time and trust the
high standards of the project promoters. Yet local people have been kept
completely in the dark about this pipeline. How can we start trusting
now?’

Frustrated by officialdom, last month 400 residents took part in a
demonstration that interrupted the pipeline construction for one hour.
The demonstration, consisting mainly of women and children, was
violently broken up by the police. A police representative declared that
the orders had come directly from the government.

Eleonora Digmelashvili, another resident, commented, “We have applied to
the IFC Ombudsman as a last resort. There needs to be an independent
expert analysis of BTC impacts on our homes as well as strong guarantees
for our and our children’s security. If there are no such guarantees
then the pipeline route must be changed or we should be resettled.”

Contacts:

Merabi Vacheishvili
Tel: + 995 24 17 34 58
E-mail: [email protected]

Eleonora Digmelashvili
Tel: + 995 93 91 77 05
E-mail: [email protected]

Notes for editors:

1) The official complaint to the IFC’s Compliance Advisor/Ombudsman is
available here:

2) The four World Bank Group policies and procedures cited in the
official complaint are:

o Procedures for public disclosure
o IFC Operational Policy 4.01 on environmental assessment
o World Bank Operational Policy 4.30 on involuntary resettlement
o Procedures for preparation of Resettlement Action Plan

Background information on the BTC project is available from the
Bankwatch website:

Greig Aitken
Media coordinator
CEE Bankwatch Network
Bratislavska 31
602 00 Brno
Czech Republic
Tel: +420-545 214 431, ext 19

3. AZERBAIJAN
3.1. KAZAKHSTAN WILL TRANSPORT GAS THROUGH AZERBAIJAN

Kazakhstan will export certain part of its gas through Azerbaijan, said
president Ilham Aliyev at a meeting yesterday, according to Turan News
Agency.

A gas transporting agreement between Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan was
reached during Aliyev’s Kazakhstan visit on March 1-2. The gas
transporting will be done via Baku-Tbilisi-Arzurum gas pipeline.

Kazakhstan produces 80 billion cubic meters of gas a year.

Kazakhstan may transport its oil with Azeri oil pipeline as well. An
agreement for an oil transfer is expected to be signed during a senior
Kazakh officials’ visit to Azerbaijan soon. According to initial talks
by the governments of the two countries Kazakh oil will be brought to
Azerbaijan with tankers. An off-shore pipeline might be built in case
the volume of oil delivery exceeds 20 million tons, according to
officials of Azerbaijan.
Baku Today, March 12, 2004

3.2. AZERBAIJAN EXPECTS BAKU-ERZERUM GAS PIPELINE TO OPEN IN 2006

Construction of the Baku-Erzerum gas pipeline will be completed by the
end of 2006, Azerbaijan President Ilkham Aliyev declared Friday at a
leadership meeting of Azerbaijan’s ruling party, Eni Azerbaijan,
Rosbalt. learned at the party press office.

The president said the line would make possible movement of Ajeri gas to
Turkey and then to Europe. Aliyev also said the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan
export oil pipeline would be in operation by the end of 2004. He said
additional countries were now seeking to be linked to the pipeline, the
press office said.

According to expert figures, Azerbaijan will be producing approximately
50 billion cubic meters of natural gas from its sector of the Caspian
Sea by early 2007. The republic itself will need about 20% of this
amount.
Rosbalt, March 15, 2004

3.3. BAKU HOPES FOR RAPID ADOPTION OF CASPIAN CONVENTION

Baku is seeking the soonest adoption of a convention on the legal status
of the Caspian Sea, said Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Vilayat Quliyev.

“We think that all of the convention’s provisions must be based on
international law and the states’ interests. We believe this will help
us come to an agreement,” Quliyev said at the opening of a Tuesday
session of the special working group responsible for determining the
Caspian’s status.

The Azerbaijan foreign minister said that his country, Russia, and
Kazakhstan have signed bilateral agreements, which provide a foundation
for reaching an agreement on the convention. “We hope that Iran and
Turkmenistan will join our position,” he said.

“Azerbaijan is opposed to militarizing the Caspian Sea and supports the
idea of turning it into a sea of friendship,” Quliyev said. He added
that improving regional security will contribute to resolving the status
issue.
Rosbalt, March 16, 2004

3.4. AZERBAIJAN PARTICIPATES IN BERLIN INTERNATIONAL TOURIST EXHIBITION

The `International Tourist Exhibition 2004 arranged by the World Tourist
Organization with the assistance of the German Ministry of Economy and
Labor and the International Exhibition Center’ gathered over 10 thousand
travel agencies from 178 countries in Berlin.

Each country has its separate exhibition section in the Berlin
international Exhibition Center covering 170 hectares area. The
Azerbaijan’s exposition assembled under the supervision of the Ministry
of Youth, Sports and Hotel `Grand Europa’ at the 50 square meters hall
¹5 and greets the visitors with the words Welcome to Azerbaijan’ on
entrance. The exposition includes models and pictures of Azerbaijan’s
ancient cultural monuments, as well as modern Hotel complexes combined
Western and Eastern architecture, photos of picturesque surroundings of
the country, samples of national clothes, carpets etc. The visitors show
interest in maps reflecting tourist opportunities, Great Silk Road,
related booklets and brochures and other promotional materials.

Head of the Azerbaijan delegation, Minister of Youth, Sports and Tourism
Abulfaz Garayev addressing the opening ceremony updated local a foreign
journalists on outlooks of tourism development in the country.

Heads of delegations participating in the exhibition highly praised the
exposition of Azerbaijan and stated they intended to sign cooperation
agreements with Azerbaijan on tourists exchange.
AzerTag, March 15, 2004

3.5. KEEPING BTC TRANSPARENT

The Open Society Institute of Azerbaijan intends to launch a new grant
program for non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to monitor the
construction of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline.
CBN, March 17, 2004

4. ARMENIA
4.1. ARMENIA LOOKS FOR ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES

According to t he information of Vardan Khachatryan, the Minister of
Finance and Economy of Armenia, the construction of a gas pipeline
between Iran and Armenia may begin in 2004 and will take from one to two
years. Gas pipeline will become an alternative source of energy
resources for Armenia in line with the program of shutting down the
Armenian Nuclear Power Plant [NPP]. Some 1bn dollars are to be found in
order to replace the NPP’s capacity, he said. At present, only the
European Union has stated its readiness to allocate to this ends 100m
euros that will be transferred to a specially designated fund. On top of
that the EU will facilitate its search for international investors,
Khachatryan said. He did not rule out Russia’s participation in the
construction of the pipeline. The acting Russian deputy prime minister,
Boris Aleshin, stated Russia ‘s interest in that during his recent visit
to Yerevan. Khachatryan said that work is under way to build in Armenia
wind power and hydropower stations as substitutes for the NPP. It is
also planned to upgrade the Yerevan thermal power station with the
140m-dollar credit from the Japan Bank of International Cooperation. The
minister said that there is a strategic program to develop the Armenian
energy sector by 2020 and the program envisages a series of measures
aimed at shutting down the NPP.
Arminfo, March 15, 2004

4.2. EU OFFERS ARMENIA 100 MILLION EUROS TO SHUT DOWN NUCLEAR PLANT

The European Union renewed pleas to Armenia Monday to close a nuclear
power station in an earthquake-prone zone, saying it would provide 100
million euros (122 million dollars) in compensatory aid. The
Soviet-built Metzamor plant, 30 kilometers (18 miles) west of the
Armenian capital Yerevan, supplies 40 percent of the energy in the
former Soviet republic. It was commissioned in 1980 but closed
temporarily because of an earthquake in 1988. “Safety is very important
to us,” said Torben Holtze, head of the European Commission delegation
here. “The EU will give Armenia 100 million euros to create alternative
energy production when Armenia sets a date for the closure of the power
plant,” he told journalists.

But Armenian Finance Minister Vardan Khachatrian said his country would
need a billion dollars to compensate for losses if the nuclear plant
closes.

The question of closure was “a very painful question for us,” he said.
“We will not close the plant until we have alternative energy sources.”
He said construction of a gas pipeline between Iran and Armenia set to
begin this year would speed moves towards alternative energy.

The nuclear plant was closed down temporarily in 1988 because of an
earthquake at Spitak, but resumed operating in 1995 in order to help
stave off a national energy crisis.

The EU signed an accord with Armenia on closing the plant this year but
Armenia has failed to meet this deadline.

Officials here say the plant is capable of operating until 2018.

Gaguik Markossian, the plant’s director, said in December that
international credits and aid had allowed Armenia to make many safety
improvements at the plant, which includes two 440-megawatt reactors,
only one of which is in operation.

With electricity supplies reduced to three or four hours a day and
industry in crisis, one of the reactors was restarted in 1995. Since
then about 35 million dollars (28 million euros) have been spent on
various safety improvements.

The Institute for Applied Ecology in Austria says the Armenian plant,
along with similar units in Bulgaria, is among the most dangerous in
Europe.
AFP, March 15, 2004

4.3. LIVING IN YEREVAN BECOMES HAZARDOUS, NGO SAYS

On March 16, 2004 a coalition of 28 nature protection non-governmental
organizations, united in Yerevan Ecological Alliance, warned that living
in Armenia’s capital is becoming gradually hazardous, following mass
logging of trees in public parks and building the vacated areas with
cafes and other entertaining facilities.

Sona Ayvazian, one of the seven members of the Alliance’s board stated:
“We have neither forests, nor parks, the only green area in the capital
is the Botanic garden in which many species are drying up.” She called
on mass medias and public at large to raise their protesting voice
against the ongoing destruction of green areas. According to another
speaker, in early nineties trees were cut by people to warm their houses
due to the lack of other fuel, today forests are destroyed to make
money.
Armenpress, March 16, 2004

—
*******************************************
CENN INFO
Caucasus Environmental NGO Network (CENN)

Tel: ++995 32 92 39 46
Fax: ++995 32 92 39 47
E-mail: [email protected]
URL:

***********************************************************************
CENN is a moderated mailing list created by Caucasus Environmental
NGO Network (CENN) to maintain and encorage e-mail discussions on
environmental issues in the Caucasus region and abroad.
By sending the letter on address [email protected] all subscribers will
receive it. To unsubscribe, send the message <UNSUBSCRIBE CENN> to
[email protected] The message subject is irrelevant and can be left
blank.

For help, contact the list manager: [email protected]

Editorial policy: CENN both solicits and accepts submissions for
environmental information to the Caucasus Environmental NGO Network.
Although, CENN retains the right to edit all materials both for
content and length. The information provided through CENN does
not necessarily represent the opinion of SDC and CENN.

CENN, on behalf of the Caucasus Environmental NGOs, would like to
express gratitude to the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation
(SDC) for provision of financial support for regional environmental
networking program.

For more information about the program, please visit CENN web-page:

***********************************************************************

A1 Plus | 21:47:51 | 17-03-2004 | Politics |

URSULA SCHLEICHER HELD A PRESS CONFERENCE

Ursula Schleicher and Armen Rustamyan, Co-Chairs of European Union-Armenia
Parliamentary Cooperation Commission held a press conference Parliament.

Mrs Schleicher expressed joy over the unprecedented economic growth but
added that there are still poor in Armenia and Government had to elaborate
poverty reduction project.

As to provision of speech freedom and pluralism in electronic Mass Media,
Mrs Schleicher informed that the delegation had met Grigor Amalyan. He had
introduced Schleicher the licensing order and explained that broadcasting
can be granted only through tender.

We asked if European Union has key factors to send a group of experts to
check whether there are free frequencies in the Armenian field since
Armenian Communication Minister and Amalyan insist there aren’t any whereas
the specialists confirm the contrary. “Armenia is a CE member and CE has
legal methods to solve such problems. You’d better address it for that
purpose”, Mrs Schleicher answered.

By the way, at the end of the 6th sitting of European Union-Armenia
Parliamentary Cooperation Commission parties approved a statement, which
consisted of rather gentle phrasings, for instance the clause on press
freedom says. “An attention is paid to the vital role of free press to
provide democracy development in Armenia and underlines necessity of
pluralism of electronic Mass Media”.

—

Kaiser Arbitration May Be Unenforceable, Says Unfair Business Competition
Case Finalized Today
To: State and City Desk

Contact: Carmen Balber of Election Watchdog, 310-392-0522, ext. 324; web:

LOS ANGELES, March 17 /U.S. Newswire/ — The son of a Kaiser Permanente
patient who died under Kaiser’s care filed final papers with the court today
in a groundbreaking suit which requires Kaiser to disclose to patients that
its arbitration provisions may be unenforceable. Kaiser routinely funnels
aggrieved patients and survivors into binding arbitration and denies them
access to the courtroom. Chant Yedalian’s case, brought under the unfair
business competition law and finalized today, restricts the ability of the
HMO to continue forcing arbitration on patients as a way to limit their
liability.
Yedalian went to law school following his mother’s death to find a way to
prevent others from suffering as his mother did. Now, Kaiser has contributed
$100,000 to a ballot initiative which would gut the unfair business
competition law, which Yedalian used to force Kaiser’s disclosure.

“Kaiser broke California law by forcing patients into secret arbitration
proceedings without fully and properly disclosing that they had given up
their rights. Today’s filing closes the door on the HMO’s illegal actions.
The unfair business competition law was the only tool I had to hold Kaiser
accountable for its deception. With today’s resolution of the case, Kaiser
should take back the donation it made to the anti- patient initiative and
stop its efforts to restrict patients’ rights,” said Yedalian.

Mandatory arbitration is a private proceeding in which there is no public
record or judicial appeal, and arbitrators are often biased in favor of the
HMO. Kaiser failed to follow state law requiring the HMO to disclose to
enrollees that they were giving up their right to go to court in case of a
dispute. Because of this failure, a court found that the HMO’s arbitration
provision was not enforceable. Yedalian’s suit forced Kaiser to disclose to
patients considering a medical malpractice claim that they may not be bound
to arbitration. After the document filed today is signed by the court, the
action will be dismissed and the court will retain jurisdiction over the
case to ensure that the settlement is enforced and Kaiser informs patients
of their rights.

Yedalian’s mother, Zevart, died in 1998 at the age of 53. She died from
breast cancer after Kaiser denied her a bone marrow transplant that could
have saved her life. His only avenue to ensure that other Kaiser patients
are not secretly deprived of their day in court through hidden mandatory
arbitration agreements was the state’s unfair business competition law.
Under the initiative to gut the law, currently circulating for the November
ballot, Yedalian’s case could never have been brought.

Yedalian joined over 60 public interest groups last week who have asked that
Kaiser and other corporate donors withdraw their support of the
anti-consumer initiative. (Read their letter at
Read the
initiative at .

“Kaiser should not be using premium dollars to fight against patient rights
and HMO accountability,” said Carmen Balber, a consumer advocate with
Election Watchdog. “This ballot initiative is an attempt by big business to
eliminate responsibility when they mislead, abuse and cheat consumers.”

The unfair business competition law was “the only vehicle we had to
vindicate the public’s constitutional right to trial by jury,” said
Yedalian.

Insurance, HMO and auto companies are bankrolling the initiative which would
eliminate the right of public interest organizations to bring cases on
behalf of Californians to prevent injury or harm to the environment,
workers, consumers or the public health, instead only allowing cases brought
by the government or after the damage has been done. Further, the
legislature would never be allowed to amend the law.

The big business initiative is in part a response to successful suits
brought by the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights and other
organizations under the Unfair Business Competition Law against HMOs that
put profits before patients and insurance companies that low-balled claims
in the wake of the Northridge earthquake.

—

Election Watchdog is a political action committee sponsored by Consumer
Watchdog, a nonprofit public benefit corporation organized in California.
Election Watchdog was organized to protect consumers’ interests in the
ballot initiative process and does not take positions on candidate
elections. Consumer Watchdog is the advocacy and campaign affiliate of the
Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights (FTCR). Learn more at

Azat Artsakh – Republic of Nagorno Karabakh (NKR)
12-03-2004

THE DANGEROUS MARSH OF KARABAKH

Soon it will be ten years since bloodshed was stopped in Karabakh but
the conflict remains unsettled. The month of February of this year
“dragged” the quest for peace from the deadlock to a real marsh. The
situation with the conflict has never been so disorderly. Today
everybody knows that the delay in the process of negotiations was not
related to the presidential elections in Armenia and Azerbaijan, and
Heidar Aliev’s retreat from power. It is obviously the consistent
crisis: Baku and Yerevan suffer from maximalism and are not willing
for compromises, and Stepanakert does not participate in negotiations
yet. The new president of Azerbaijan Heidar Aliev has realized that
he has no power to admit the loss of Karabakh (his father was almost
going to take that step), and therefore prefers not continuing (on
the acquired basis) the negotiations with Robert Kocharian started
three years ago in Key West and Paris. Foreign minister of Azerbaijan
even proposed starting the negotiations from “zero” but nobody knows
where this zero is. Robert Kocharian does not agree to give up what
has been achieved. But if they propose starting negotiations from
zero Robert Kocharian suggested starting them with Nagorni Karabakh.
Baku appeared in a controversial situation. If they formerly
emphasized that Azerbaijan’s patience is not limitless, and they
would liberate the territories occupied by Armenians at any cost
(even by violating all their obligations of settling the conflict in
a peaceful way) today they are of the opinion that time works for
them and there is no need to hurry. It is known that the parties and
the international organizations have always been absolutely for a
rapid peaceful settlement. Baku also reminds regularly that the life
of the Azerbaijani refugees in tents is unbearable any more. And
suddenly such slowness. Moreover, I. Aliev is categorically against
compromises, which even his father did not dare to make. Perhaps he
has discovered another “possibility” of regulation, that of
unilateral dictate. Formerly they blamed Robert Kocharian for not
being concessive and tolerable, for the syndrome of the winner.
Whereas today, I. Aliev has gone further ahead of Armenians assuming
the bearing of a virtual winner in the economic and military
competition. We may only welcome the fact that he has been supporting
peaceful settlement of the conflict more often, yielding only to the
announcements of the defence minister about revenge by force. We
shall ascribe these zigzags to the fact that the head of state
adjusts to his role in hard conditions, and come back to the hard
fate of the Karabakh settlement. Despite the disorderly situation,
one thing is clear: Baku and Yerevan cannot impose on each other
their favourable variants of solution neither in respect to the cause
of the conflict (the status of Nagorni Karabakh) or elimination of
the consequences (occupation of territories outside the border of
NK), nor the methods of problem settlement (package or false stage by
stage variant). The approaches of the parties in many respects were
very different in the past too but they have never been that
polarized. The doubts concerning the effectiveness of the meeting of
the two presidents today are becoming clearer. It is high time to
reconsider the “lazy” process of negotiations for Nagorni Karabakh
but never to start from “zero”. It is necessary to return to the
stable mechanism of regular negotiations between the accredited
delegations of all the parties within the framework of international
mediation, with an open agenda to achieve agreements in any question
(no matter if those are insignificant in the beginning). A true
alternative to the deadlock in the negotiations is the ancient saying
“Slow and steady wins the race”; it will be favourable for all the
parties. Patiently proceeding “from the simple to the complicated” is
more effective than any attempt at solving the problems immediately.
If seeking for the settlement is to go on within the framework of the
OSCE (otherwise there are a lot of candidates) there is no more exact
calculation than the resolutions of the December 6, 1994 summit of
Budapest. Those were passed by consensus, on the highest level, and
what is more, not before the peak of military actions (as the
Helsinki resolution of March 1992) but after the cease-fire. It is
more substantial than the other processes for the mechanism of the
negotiations. The later created forms of relationships (meetings of
presidents, missions of the co-chairmen) were some additional forms
never brought into being outside the mandate of Budapest. This was
the result of inconsistency of the parties and the departure of the
co-chairmen from the OSCE resolutions under the pressure of the
parties. By the way the Budapest summit had set an aim to conduct
negotiations without delay and open the Minsk consultation. The OSCE
and the co-chairmen could have revealed more clearly to what extent
the parties needed international mediation in conflict settlement.
How can the parties demand activity and new suggestions from the
mediators if they do not hurry at all (some quietly, others
announcing to the world). The efforts of the parties for finding
peace should not be weaker than those of the mediators. There are
already many ideas on resumption of the negotiation process, there is
also a variety of new suggestions. But this will have meaning only in
case of more serious approach to the problem by the parties which
have brought the long-lasting deadlock situation to a dangerous
marsh.

VLADIMIR KAZIMIROV

Azat Artsakh – Republic of Nagorno Karabakh (NKR)
12-03-2004

YMCA IN ARTSAKH

By the invitation of the public organization “Youth Center” the
delegation of the Young Men’s Christian Association arrived in
Stepanakert on March 8. The delegation was headed by the vice
secretary chief of the European alliance of YMCA Mihal Shumanchek.
Among the delegates were the secretary on development of the YMCA
European alliance Vardan Hambardzoumian, the chairman of the Armenian
national union of YMCA Artur Ghazarian, secretary of programs Marat
Mouradian, director of the office Ghazaros Bardakchian. According to
the chairman of the organization “Youth Center” Lousine Grigorian, in
2002-2003 several members of the center visited Armenia, Georgia and
Russia and, took part in the training held by the Council of Europe
on democracy and conflicts where they came in touch with members of
the YMCA. In autumn several YMCA members visited Stepanakert and once
again met with the members of the Youth Center. On March 8 of the
current year the YMCA delegation arrived in Stepanakert to assist to
the young people of Artsakh in establishing the organization here.
The first YMCA in Armenia was established in 1908, in the city Adana
in West Armenia, the members of which fell victim to the genocide
organized by Turkey. In Armenia the movement was revived in 1992 due
to a group of young people in cooperation with the organization Care
International. In 1994 it was registered as a public organization.
According to Lusineh Grigorian, probably by the end of 2004 the
Artsakh organization of YMCA will start operating in Artsakh.

CHRISTINE KHANUMIAN